Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 19 | 05 | 24 |
| Approved Not made | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Rejected | 04 | 04 | 08 |
| Total | 25 | 09 | 34 |
| Lowest Income: | $18,487 | Highest Income: | $181,739 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $1,564,941 | 24 | $65,206 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 00 | 06 | 04 | 03 | 03 | 08 | 24 |
| Percentage of Loans | 0% | 25% | 16.67% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 33.33% | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 24 | 100% |
| Total | 24 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 24 | $701,487 |
| Total | 24 | $701,487 |
| Lowest | 4% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 4% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | 24 | 4% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 24 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 24 |
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 01 | $1,650 |
| Hearing | 01 | $5,180 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $12,197 |
| Daily living | 02 | $9,299 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 18 | $672,628 |
| Computers and related | 01 | $533 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 24 | $701,487 |
| Number Loans in default | 06 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $65,630 |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 2 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 774 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 516 |
| C. Total Served | 1290 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1290 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 76 | $78,882 |
| Hearing | 846 | $343,986 |
| Speech communication | 240 | $207,361 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 94 | $99,742 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 34 | $39,889 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 1290 | $769,860 |
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Vision Loss Technology |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 489 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 326 |
| C. Total Served | 815 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 815 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 1629 | $173,025 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 1629 | $173,025 |
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
WisLoan provided the financing for a retired couple this past year to obtain an accessible van and trailer. The couple create and sell craft items to supplement their retirement income. The accessible van and trailer will allow them to continue this employment activity. "We want to thank you again for everything you did to help us get our new van. We thought this would be at least a six-month process, but you pushed it through in a very short time, and the down payment assistance amount was absolutely incredible. It was life changing, and there aren't enough words to express our appreciation. We absolutely love the van, and we were able to get a trailer to haul our crafts to area shows this fall. I've attached a couple of photos for you. Thanks again... "
A consumer with progressive hearing and vision loss was having difficulty with distance communication for connecting with her family and medical providers. This individual was limited in her transportation options and her spouse was dealing with ongoing medical issues. All of these factors were impacted by her lack of telecommunications access. Through the iCanConnect program and WisTech she was able to receive devices and the training to access telecommunications. The devices included a computer, tablet, and smartphone. She was reluctant to use the smartphone or keep it powered on for fear it would drain the battery. After additional training she began to send a text message to her son every day. She is now confident on using her smartphone and accessing the technology she needs.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 2,129 | 2,129 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 2,129 | 2,129 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 2,129 | 2,129 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 00 | 2,129 | 2,129 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 2,129 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 2,129 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 543 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,433 |
| C. Total | 2,976 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,976 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 02 | $520 | $0 | $520 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 75 | $93,679 | $33,415 | $60,264 |
| Daily Living | 1,143 | $20,713 | $5,603 | $15,110 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $830 | $0 | $830 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 09 | $121,350 | $34,900 | $86,450 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | $2,820 | $900 | $1,920 |
| Total | 1,231 | $239,912 | $74,818 | $165,094 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 18 | $8,447 | $0 | $8,447 |
| Hearing | 86 | $35,710 | $0 | $35,710 |
| Speech Communication | 122 | $163,694 | $0 | $163,694 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 15 | $1,139 | $0 | $1,139 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 6,614 | $449,064 | $1,691 | $447,373 |
| Daily Living | 691 | $88,403 | $380 | $88,023 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 28 | $44,326 | $0 | $44,326 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 17 | $2,790 | $0 | $2,790 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 09 | $8,379 | $0 | $8,379 |
| Total | 7,600 | $801,952 | $2,071 | $799,881 |
A local nursing home/assisted living facility recently experienced a fire. While all residents evacuated safely, several had to leave their mobility devices behind. A community member familiar with the WisTech program partner, Independent Living Resources, contacted the agency for help. In response, the agency donated ten walkers and several walker bags to the residents, ensuring they regained access to the assistive technology they needed.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 08 | 00 | 855 | 863 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 05 | 951 | 959 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 914 | 916 |
| 4. Subtotal | 13 | 05 | 2,720 | 2,738 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 13 | 05 | 2,720 | 2,738 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 238 | 238 |
| 8. Total | 13 | 05 | 2,958 | 2,976 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 91.95% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 2,707 | 90.96% |
| Satisfied | 27 | 0.91% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.13% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 238 | 8% |
| Total Surveyed | 2,976 | |
| Response rate % | 92% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 421 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 119 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 413 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 18 |
| Total | 971 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 265 | 359 | 624 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 23 | 106 | 129 |
| Representative of Education | 103 | 43 | 146 |
| Representative of Employment | 02 | 01 | 03 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 17 | 11 | 28 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 08 | 26 | 34 |
| Representatives of Technology | 03 | 04 | 07 |
| Total | 421 | 550 | 971 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 76 | 07 | 83 |
| Hearing | 91 | 31 | 122 |
| Speech Communication | 86 | 30 | 116 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 27 | 05 | 32 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 81 | 468 | 549 |
| Daily Living | 157 | 121 | 278 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 24 | 72 | 96 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 07 | 02 | 09 |
| Computers and Related | 64 | 22 | 86 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 35 | 20 | 55 |
| Total | 648 | 778 | 1,426 |
A consumer worked with our program partner, Options for Independent Living, to borrow an adapted kayak. At 89 years of age, she had been kayaking for two years enjoying a small lake just outside her back door. This meaningful hobby allows her to remain active and engaged. Recently, she began to feel unsteady using her kayak and reached out to try the adapted version. She shared, “I was thrilled to get exercise, be outside, and do something to keep my mind and brain active!” During the loan, she hoped her neighbors would see her out on the lake!
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 46 | 10 | 212 | 268 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 01 | 70 | 75 |
| Subtotal | 50 | 11 | 282 | 343 |
| Have not made a decision | 61 | 00 | 17 | 78 |
| Subtotal | 111 | 11 | 299 | 421 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 111 | 11 | 299 | 421 |
| Performance on this measure | 45.05% | 100% | 94.31% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 08 | 03 | 353 | 364 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 34 | 02 | 94 | 130 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 03 | 00 | 53 | 56 |
| 4. Subtotal | 45 | 05 | 500 | 550 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 45 | 05 | 500 | 550 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 45 | 05 | 500 | 550 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 755 | 77.75% |
| Satisfied | 191 | 19.67% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 20 | 2.06% |
| Not at all satisfied | 05 | 0.51% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 971 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 78 |
| Hearing | 101 |
| Speech Communication | 20 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 33 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 84 |
| Daily Living | 170 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 21 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 02 |
| Computers and Related | 94 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 53 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 656 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 511 | 29 | 540 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 92 | 195 | 287 |
| Representatives of Education | 08 | 09 | 17 |
| Representatives of Employment | 05 | 01 | 06 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 08 | 04 | 12 |
| Representative of Community Living | 32 | 22 | 54 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 656 | 260 | 916 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 75 |
| Service Provider | 159 |
| Vendor | 10 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 01 |
| Total | 245 |
Access to Independence, a WisTech program partner, assisted a local teacher with a device demonstration. The teacher experienced hearing loss that impacted their ability to communicate with students in the classroom. WisTech recently added a pair of caption glasses to their device inventory. The teacher was able to work with program staff to trial the glasses. Once the teacher decided the glasses would meet his needs in the classroom, he worked with his vocational rehabilitation counselor to secure funding to purchase the glasses. This device demonstration allowed the teacher to maintain employment.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 38 | 70 | 428 | 536 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 03 | 26 | 31 |
| Subtotal | 40 | 73 | 454 | 567 |
| Have not made a decision | 06 | 02 | 81 | 89 |
| Subtotal | 46 | 75 | 535 | 656 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 46 | 75 | 535 | 656 |
| Performance on this measure | 86.96% | 97.33% | 84.86% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 821 | 89.63% |
| Satisfied | 85 | 9.28% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.11% |
| Nonrespondent | 09 | 0.98% |
| Total | 916 | |
| Response rate % | 99.02% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 16 | 03 | 3,337 | 3,356 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 37 | 07 | 1,045 | 1,089 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 00 | 967 | 972 |
| 4. Subtotal | 58 | 10 | 5,349 | 5,417 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 58 | 10 | 5,349 | 5,417 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 238 | 238 |
| 8. Total | 58 | 10 | 5,587 | 5,655 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 91.38% | 100% | 78.43% | 78.6% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 84 | 80 | 640 | 804 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 06 | 04 | 96 | 106 |
| Subtotal | 90 | 84 | 736 | 910 |
| Have not made a decision | 67 | 02 | 98 | 167 |
| Subtotal | 157 | 86 | 834 | 1,077 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 157 | 86 | 834 | 1,077 |
| Performance on this measure | 57.32% | 97.67% | 88.25% | 84.49% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.56% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 96.47% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 1,524 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 358 |
| Representatives of Education | 1,031 |
| Representatives of Employment | 610 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 760 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 891 |
| Representatives of Technology | 31 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 5,205 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3,224 | 1,715 | 266 | 5,205 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 649 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 22 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 4,154 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 358 |
| Transition | 22 |
| Total | 5,205 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
WisTech hosts webinars throughout the year to provide free, statewide education about assistive technology. This year, three webinars focused on assistive technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and assistive technology service delivery. Attendees learned about general AI use, ethical considerations around digital autonomy, and incorporating AI with digital literacy training. All webinars are fully accessible with sign language interpretation, captioning, and are uploaded to the WisTech YouTube channel for on-demand access.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Independence First, a WisTech Program partner, hosted a "Fidget March Madness" event to create awareness about the benefits of using fidgets for anxiety management. The event started with 32 fidgets - 16 commercial and 16 3D printed. Participants were encouraged to try all options, leading to numerous referrals to vendors who sell fidgets, and 3D printing plans. Participants included staff, consumers, and several high school groups. Several participants discovered fidgets they liked and returned with friends and family members, encouraging them to try their favorites. High school students started lively discussions, comparing the merits of various options and exchanging reasons why they chose their preferred fidget.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
WisTech delivered two impactful ICT trainings this year. First, staff presented a pre-conference workshop on shelter accessibility at the Governor's Conference on Emergency Management and Homeland Security, attended by public health workers and staff from the Red Cross. Specific information presented included assistive technology devices related to emergency response and preparedness. This included instructions on how to access WisTech’s short term device loan inventory using the AT4ALL website. The second impactful ICT training was conducted for the Division of Workforce Development. WisTech staff provided an in-depth session on assistive technology and artificial intelligence, focusing on how evolving technologies affect accessibility and employment services for people with disabilities.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 232 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 126 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 358 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
| Education | 01% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 00% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 02% |
| Community Living | 96% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 01% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Division of Vocational Rehabilitation invited WisTech to serve on a workgroup to review the Tech Specs for assistive technology. These Tech Specs are used by vocational rehab staff, consumers, and providers to ensure high-quality assistive technology services are available for clients as they pursue employment goals. This work involved an in-depth review of current policies and procedures, followed by detailed input on updates and improvements. This technical assistance opportunity enabled WisTech to offer un-biased guidance on how AT services funded by DVR should be delivered.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Society’s Assets, a WisTech program partner, took part in area CCOT team meetings. CCOTs hold quarterly meetings dedicated to addressing issues around youth transition from high school to adulthood. At these meetings, staff provide input on accessibility and assistive technology. One specific example was a recent quarterly meeting where the accessibility of virtual transition fairs was addressed. This included the importance of captions, clear language, easy to find links, and plain language materials. Emphasis was also place on considering families who do not have access to devices or internet at home to attend.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. indiGO, a WisTech program partner, hosts a weekly radio show on WOJB, a local station out of Hayward, Wisconsin. The WOJB radio station is owned and managed by the Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Public Broadcasting Corporation. The majority of staff and board are Native Americans. The radio show focuses on assistive technology and independent living services for people with disabilities. WOJB reaches over 9 counties in northern Wisconsin, an area that includes several reservations. The radio spot offers a unique opportunity to reach a broad audience of individuals who otherwise may not be familiar with assistive technology and the services available.
2. Access to Independence, a WisTech program partner, hosted the second annual Adaptive Gaming Expo in the Madison, Wisconsin area. This free event is held each year to promote awareness and access to gaming for people with disabilities. The event includes exhibitors, keynote speakers, and hands-on accessible gaming zone. Society’s Assets, another WisTech program partner, joined the event with a booth to highlight additional adaptive gaming device setup options.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 7,990 | 4,654 | 12,644 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 4,426 | 3,303 | 7,729 |
| Representative of Education | 140 | 64 | 204 |
| Representative of Employment | 91 | 10 | 101 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 311 | 142 | 453 |
| Representative of Community Living | 2,411 | 1,927 | 4,338 |
| Representative of Technology | 73 | 11 | 84 |
| Unable to Categorize | 04 | 01 | 05 |
| Total | 15,446 | 10,112 | 25,558 |
WisTech implements the AT Act program using a hybrid model, directly conducting program activities from our office and through subcontracts and program partners. Requests for information and assistance come from all 72 Wisconsin counties showing WisTech’s broad reach. Approximately 90% of referrals come from individuals with disabilities or their family members. The requests are split roughly 60% for AT devices and services and 40% for AT policies and funding. This year saw increased requests for used equipment, largely due to distribution efforts by two partners, Independence First and Options for Independent Living. Increased collaboration within our Bureau at the Department of Health Services has also increased awareness of WisTech among individuals with disabilities and their families.
Requests for information and assistance come from diverse sources, reflecting positively on outreach efforts conducted by WisTech staff and program partners. One WisTech partner started a concentrated outreach effort to private businesses within their service delivery area raising awareness among human resource staff and employers about assistive technology accommodations. Collaboration between WisTech and Aging and Disability Centers has increased brand awareness leading to additional requests for information and assistance in all areas, especially for WisLoan, Wisconsin’s alternative finance program.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 2 |
|---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Staff from the WisTech program and the Office for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing have been asked to assist the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (DOC) on accommodations for incarcerated individuals who have a hearing loss. This relationship was initiated following a US Department of Justice settlement directing the DOC to provide adequate accommodations. This work was initiated in the fourth quarter of the reporting year and will be ongoing.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The results of the collaboration to date include a thorough review of the DOJ settlement and a direct staff contact person available to interact with incarcerated individuals regarding accommodation needs, An onsite visit was conducted by WisTech and ODHH staff at one of the 36 correctional facilities. Future plans include an in-depth training for the ADA coordinators, a survey about accommodations for the ADA coordinators, and development of standardized assistive technology solutions resource for statewide use.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Other: ADA and incarceration;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Training; Technical Assistance;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The Division of Public Health selected the Statewide Assistive Technology Program Coordinator to represent Wisconsin at the Roundtable on Strengthening Health through Outdoor Recreation meeting in Washington DC. The other Wisconsin representative was the Director of Outdoor Recreation. The event was hosted by the National Governor's Association and Wisconsin was one of 13 states in attendance. National speakers shared information and insights around access to recreation and the connection to public health. Each speaker segment was followed by in-depth discussions by attendees who were able to share information from their states and learn about initiatives from other participants. WisTech's role was to emphasize accessibility for people with disabilities and assistive technology opportunities around health and outdoor recreation.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
A comprehensive report from the Division of Public Health and the Office for Outdoor Recreation was compiled and shared with the Governor's office. The opportunity for WisTech and the Office of Outdoor Recreation to attend this event together will serve as a starting point for future collaborations. One key takeway was greater awareness by the Office of Outdoor Recreation around accessibility for people with disabilities. Emphasis will also be placed on building recreational access into various state plans such as the State Plan for Assistive Technology and other similar plans can build upon this initial collaboration.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Technical Assistance;
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
|---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
WisTech developed and launched assistive technology (AT) coursework for providers in Wisconsin to become WisTech AT certified and ATP (assistive technology professional) verified. These certifications build and recognize the experience and knowledge needed to provide high-quality, consumer-driven, and comprehensive AT services. The WisTech AT certification is for providers expanding their knowledge in AT, assessments, and service delivery. The WisTech AT certification course consists of 12 weekly learning modules that include discussion posts, self-knowledge checks, AT product reviews, and a final case study report. The WisTech Verified ATP certification is for providers who hold the ATP international certification from RESNA. The WisTech ATP verification course consists of three learning modules and a self-knowledge check.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
The content development for the WisTech certifications incorporates Best Practices for AT Assessments and Best Practices for AT Vendors. Providers enrolled in the courses must agree to adhere to Best Practices when providing AT services. Funders using WisTech Certified Providers can be assured of adherence to Best Practice standards.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||