Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 90 | 08 | 98 |
| Approved Not made | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Rejected | 78 | 09 | 87 |
| Total | 172 | 17 | 189 |
| Lowest Income: | $5,400 | Highest Income: | $298,910 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $7,645,568 | 98 | $78,016 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 15 | 12 | 07 | 07 | 15 | 42 | 98 |
| Percentage of Loans | 15.31% | 12.24% | 7.14% | 7.14% | 15.31% | 42.86% | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 98 | 100% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 98 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 98 | $1,616,470 |
| Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 98 | $1,616,470 |
| Lowest | 3% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 8.5% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 442 | 98 | 4.51020408163265% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 29 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 65 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 02 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 02 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 98 |
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 18 | $60,294 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 10 | $41,236 |
| Daily living | 25 | $48,812 |
| Environmental adaptations | 06 | $54,011 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 44 | $1,395,892 |
| Computers and related | 08 | $11,225 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 01 | $5,000 |
| Total | 112 | $1,616,470 |
| Number Loans in default | 06 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $5,714 |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 62 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 3 |
| C. Total Served | 65 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 65 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 48 | $41,177 |
| Hearing | 21 | $5,565 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 4 | $295 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 51 | $39,289 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 124 | $86,326 |
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 69 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 5 |
| C. Total Served | 74 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 74 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 30 | $1,111 | $0 | $1,111 |
| Hearing | 5 | $120 | $0 | $120 |
| Speech communication | 1 | $29 | $0 | $29 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 315 | $3,188 | $0 | $3,188 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 2 | $40 | $0 | $40 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 11 | $270 | $0 | $270 |
| Total | 364 | $4,758 | $0 | $4,758 |
"Janette" came to WATAP’s state financing partner, Northwest Access Fund, for a loan to install a steering knob and electronic left foot accelerator in a car she would share with her mother. Previously, she was relying on ride share services to get to work, medical appointments, and run errands, which was costing her more than $550 per month. After an initial application had been denied, Access Fund staff worked with Janette to build her budget and address cashflow issues which had resulted in bounced payments. With this work completed, the Fund was able to approve $3,300 in financing with a 10-month term. Janette ended up going with a shorter term so that she could pay off the loan more quickly, knowing she would still be saving $200 per month in transportation expenses even with a higher loan amount. With her finances more secure, Janette was compelled to complete her training as a Certified Rehabilitation Specialist and acquire her first driver's license. She now has increased mobility and can save toward her life goals.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 07 | 98 | 110 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 23 | 11 | 85 | 119 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 4. Subtotal | 28 | 18 | 187 | 233 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
| 6. Subtotal | 29 | 18 | 190 | 237 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 29 | 18 | 190 | 237 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 96.55% | 100% | 98.42% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 231 | 97.47% |
| Satisfied | 06 | 2.53% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 237 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,162 |
| C. Total | 2,162 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,162 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 05 | $16,700 | $900 | $15,800 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 1,619 | $812,210 | $0 | $812,210 |
| Daily Living | 3,618 | $457,191 | $0 | $457,191 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 137 | $16,977 | $0 | $16,977 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 5,379 | $1,303,078 | $900 | $1,302,178 |
“Ted” has a degenerative condition that cause back and neck pain and spasms. He has worked with our WATAP’s device reuse partner, Bridge Disability Ministries’ Meyer Medical Equipment Center to explore what options might be available to help his mobility. He tried and was provided a cane initially, which worked for a while, and then a 4-wheeled walker, which for a time worked wonderfully, but as he fell more and more frequently and safety became more of an issue, he returned to the Medical Equipment Center to find another solution. The trained volunteers at the Center matched Ted with a reclining wheelchair which not only helped him with his mobility, but also relieved his back spasms and pain. Since receiving the wheelchair, Ted reports he has enjoyed going to the cinema with his partner, meeting with friends, and just be mentally present at doctor's appointments. All this “without pain and the fear of falling ruling my quality of life.”
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 1,207 | 1,207 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 890 | 891 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 64 | 64 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 2,161 | 2,162 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 2,161 | 2,162 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 01 | 2,161 | 2,162 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 1,873 | 86.63% |
| Satisfied | 173 | 8% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 96 | 4.44% |
| Not at all satisfied | 19 | 0.88% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.05% |
| Total Surveyed | 2,162 | |
| Response rate % | 99.95% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 370 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 01 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 00 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 02 |
| Total | 373 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 349 | 00 | 349 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Representative of Education | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representative of Employment | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 12 | 03 | 15 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 370 | 03 | 373 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 21 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 143 | 00 | 143 |
| Hearing | 29 | 00 | 29 |
| Speech Communication | 09 | 00 | 09 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 09 | 00 | 09 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Daily Living | 103 | 00 | 103 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 229 | 02 | 231 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 73 | 03 | 76 |
| Total | 597 | 05 | 602 |
“Hamnet” has a genetic disorder that includes global developmental delay. In particular, Hamnet had difficulty with fine motor abilities like selecting icons on an AAC device or holding a pencil, due to his limited ability to hold his hand and arm steady and secure at the various joints, including at the shoulder, elbow, and/or wrist. His school occupational therapist would sometimes employ a section of a pool noodle to lock his wrist, but someone often still had to help support his elbow for him to grasp a pencil and move it. When he was using his AAC device, it was very challenging in supporting his arm while not steering or affecting his icon selections. So his Speech-Language Pathologist suggested that he try Guided Hands, a device that uses a sliding system and a multipurpose utensil holder to promote guided hand movements and gross motor skills, as a solution to give him more control while providing support. Hament’s team was able to borrow the device from WATAP and in the 3 weeks they had it, it showed great promise. The team was able to acquire Guided Hands for him, and they are now using the device to build his fine motor skills and muscles needed to use his communication device and hold and use objects.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 05 | 55 | 178 | 238 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 02 | 23 | 26 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 57 | 201 | 264 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 08 | 00 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 65 | 201 | 272 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 07 | 91 | 98 |
| Total | 06 | 72 | 292 | 370 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 87.69% | 100% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 266 | 71.31% |
| Satisfied | 06 | 1.61% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.54% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 99 | 26.54% |
| Total Surveyed | 373 | |
| Response rate % | 73.46% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 58 |
| Hearing | 21 |
| Speech Communication | 14 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 10 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 17 |
| Daily Living | 175 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 58 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 29 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 18 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 400 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 249 | 00 | 249 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 41 | 25 | 66 |
| Representatives of Education | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Representatives of Employment | 16 | 03 | 19 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 59 | 26 | 85 |
| Representative of Community Living | 29 | 00 | 29 |
| Representative of Technology | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Total | 400 | 54 | 454 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 16 |
| Service Provider | 44 |
| Vendor | 44 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 104 |
Edith is 94 years old and strives to live independently in a retirement community. Edith came to WATAP to explore the use of smart home devices to enhance her independence and safety. She was able to see several options but liked the functionality and size of the Amazon Echo Dots. As Edith was a client of our iCanConnect program, she qualified for receiving a couple of Echo dots to place around her home. She had one placed in her garage because she wanted a way to call for help if she was out in the front yard and fell. Unfortunately, not long after we provided the Echos, she did take a fall. She was able to use the Echo to call her neighbor, who was then able to come to her and call 911. Although she ended up breaking her shoulder, she was so grateful to be able to get help so quickly and the Echo worked as she hoped it would. She will be using an emergency assist service so she can call emergency response directly from the Echos, should she need to in the future.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 00 | 17 | 381 | 398 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
| Subtotal | 00 | 18 | 382 | 400 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 00 | 18 | 382 | 400 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 00 | 18 | 382 | 400 |
| Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 445 | 98.02% |
| Satisfied | 09 | 1.98% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 454 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 08 | 1,305 | 1,318 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 24 | 12 | 975 | 1,011 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 69 | 69 |
| 4. Subtotal | 29 | 20 | 2,349 | 2,398 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
| 6. Subtotal | 30 | 20 | 2,352 | 2,402 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 30 | 20 | 2,352 | 2,402 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 96.67% | 100% | 96.94% | 96.96% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 05 | 72 | 559 | 636 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 03 | 24 | 28 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 75 | 583 | 664 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 08 | 00 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 83 | 583 | 672 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 07 | 91 | 98 |
| Total | 06 | 90 | 674 | 770 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 90.36% | 100% | 98.81% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 96.26% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 96.90% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 210 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
| Representatives of Education | 40 |
| Representatives of Employment | 15 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 197 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 84 |
| Representatives of Technology | 41 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 587 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 587 | 00 | 00 | 587 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 526 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 41 |
| Transition | 20 |
| Total | 587 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP’s Assistive Technology Demonstration Room, was renovated and re-opened to the public in early 2025. This remodel has allowed us to provide opportunities for training and education for clinical staff on rehabilitation medicine and occupational and physical therapy teams, students in those disciplines as well as those in special education and disability studies, and staff in supported employment and aging services agencies. This year we provided 16 class lectures and workshops for 361 participants where participants learned about and had opportunities for hands-on experiences with assistive technology that may benefit their clients, practice, and/or career paths. We highlighted the importance of AT selection, best practices and resources around 3D printed AT, and what materials can be used for the fabrication of low-cost solutions.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP provided a session on AT for transition for 20 students attending the State’s Center for Independence summer workshop. This session covered AT related to transition including: reading, writing, notetaking, task management, computer access, and independent living with 3D printed tools. Live demonstrations of some of the AT were provided during the training. The students explored AT tools that can increase a student’s independence and performance in school and as they transition to post-secondary education, employment and community living. They were also provided resources on how to access AT services to support decision making and those that can assist with transition related issues.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
As part of an agreement with the City of Seattle Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) for technical assistance and training around digital accessibility especially in response to the Department of Justice’s 2024 Digital Accessibility ruling, WATAP provided a series of 3 trainings to 41 participants. The first of these training was an overview of the DOJ’s 2024 Digital Accessibility ruling to the FAS Digital Accessibility Workgroup members and FAS administrators. Participants will use the information provided to improve and implement policies and practices to ensure accessibility of FAS resources available on and downloaded from websites and social media sites by the deadline of April 2026. A second training on document accessibility was provided to the Workgroup members and FAS staff in non-technical roles. This training highlighted the significance of making digital content accessible to people with disabilities and the essential steps for crafting content that everyone can access. The final training reiterated some the high level concepts provided in the second training and added more detailed steps for checking documents for accessibility in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, and PDF. This third training utilized accessibility checklists and sample documents developed by WATAP for participants to use in their work.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 32 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 09 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 41 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
| Education | 05% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 10% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 05% |
| Community Living | 50% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 30% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The City of Seattle Finance and Administrative Services (FAS) contracted with WATAP for technical assistance and training around digital accessibility especially in response to the Department of Justice’s 2024 Digital Accessibility ruling. A FAS Digital Accessibility Workgroup was formed that included WATAP and those responsible for digital content within FAS units. The Workgroup meets monthly for administration updates and to check in on work progress among the various FAS units. The Workgroup is reviewing all current web assets and applications, flagging any content that needs to be offered online. WATAP is providing accessibility testing of these assets, identifying those assets that require remediation to be made accessible. WATAP also drafted a FAS Digital Accessibility Compliance Plan, which FAS will use for guidance and link to appropriate policies, procedures, and resources to ensure accessibility for all current and future content.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP continues its partnership with the Center for Inclusive Design and Innovation Georgia Institute of Technology on a collaborative project funded by NIDILRR, “Accommodation Expert Support System for Aging Well” or Aging Well for short. The project is creating an online accommodation assessment system that service providers can use when conducting community living evaluations with older adults, who are aging into or with a disability, and their families to promote aging in place and independence. The project draws on both research and practice—and considering existing recommendation tools—and aims to create a user-friendly system for seniors, their families, caregivers, and support networks, as well as clinical professionals. During this past year, the project has finalized a demo and WATAP and Georgia Tech will be presenting this at the 2026 ATIA Conference in Orlando, Florida.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. WATAP participated in the Seattle Design Festival Block Party August 15-17, 2025, for a third year in a row. Our exhibit, "Empowered by Feedback: Inclusivity at the Zoo," featured an Empower Station intended to help people using electric mobility devices more easily power up and enjoy public spaces, as well as space for individuals and families to relax and recharge. This year’s exhibit was a collaborative effort between ourselves, the Northwest Universal Design Council, Woodland Park Zoo, Carli Hoki Design, and Age Friendly Seattle. Our concept provided a comfortable bench surrounded by bright and colorful panels depicting zoo animals, with a portable solar generator and space for those using mobility devices, to stop and top up their batteries, located nearby. We also provided the opportunity for festivalgoers to try various assistive technology devices that promote rest, relaxation, and recreation. We had 708 individuals visit the exhibit and festivalgoers had an overwhelmingly positive response to the concept. Several shared insightful feedback for making it even more inclusive, for example, highlighting that it could also help folks using oxygen tanks. Most importantly this event allows WATAP to interact and educate members of the general public about the uses and benefits of assistive technology and universal design.
2.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 853 | 261 | 1,114 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 404 | 125 | 529 |
| Representative of Education | 98 | 61 | 159 |
| Representative of Employment | 122 | 40 | 162 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 200 | 114 | 314 |
| Representative of Community Living | 136 | 172 | 308 |
| Representative of Technology | 88 | 39 | 127 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 1,901 | 812 | 2,713 |
By percentage, most individuals learn about WATAP either as a result of our own in-person and virtual outreach (~29%), or coming as referrals through community partners and their programs (~44%). One example of on-going outreach that has resulted in increased referrals is our Assistive Technology Providers Network, which promotes more meaningful professional networking, enhances collaboration among the network members and community partners, and promotes cross dissemination of information and resources. Referrals through our Providers Network has resulted in more meaningful referrals over the years from health care practitioners, educators, rehabilitation counselors especially for our device demonstration and device lending programs.
We receive a significant portion of referrals through our in-person outreach (23%) and other outreach including webinars (6%). Self referrals account for 20% with the next largest portions of our referrals coming from our relationships with our employment/ vocational rehabilitation agencies (estimated at 16%), through our state financing partners at the Northwest Access Fund and iCanConnect WA (12%), through relationships with regional health care providers (8%), and through Community Living Connects (estimated at 6%) which WATAP is a part of and includes agencies supporting independent living, aging and adult services, veterans, and caregivers. Remaining referrals (estimated at about 5%) come from education, other entities, and friends and family, and with the remaining 4% of our referrals as not known.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 1 |
|---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
For a third year in a row, WATAP has supported the Washington State Department of Services for the Blind (DSB) Independent Living Services (ILS) program, which provides services to ~1000 Washington State residents annually who are losing vision or blind. ILS utilizes a statewide network of service providers, who have experienced teachers who assist clients through teaching and building competency in daily living skills. ILS provides smart phones, tablets, and digital assistants through a long-term loan program to clients, but the service providers’ teachers continue to benefit from learning more about the features and potential of these devices. This year, WATAP developed a curriculum to provide train-the-trainer sessions focusing on iOS accessibility features related to blind and vision loss and more specifically on VoiceOver. The teachers could use this curriculum to train their own clients to learn and build new skills. WATAP also provided demonstrations and facilitated discussion of AI apps and other technology, such as the Meta Glasses. This training also promoted the sharing of knowledge, resources, tips, and instructions between WATAP staff and participants.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Through this partnership, WATAP supports the professional development needs through annual statewide and comprehensive training for ILS providers’ teachers to increase effective implementation of the long-term loan program to meet independent living outcomes of their clients. As the teachers become more confident in using the technology, they are more likely to match the functional needs of their clients with these technologies and provide the necessary technical support to increase the successful use by the clients as well. This partnership is increasing a cross referral of clients to both WATAP and ILS services that would be mutually beneficial to support building and mastering independent living skills. Since on-going professional development is necessary for current staff and to support training new staff, this training will be provided by WATAP to ILS providers’ teachers annually going forward.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Training;
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public/State Agency | $18,267 | Device Loan | True |
| Public/State Agency | $2,477 | Demonstration | True |
| Private | $3,000 | Training | True |
| Private | $390 | Device Loan | True |
| Private | $158,635 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $5,550 | Training | True |
| Public/State Agency | $87,166 | Technical Assistance | True |
| Amount: $275,485 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||