National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Back to state program information page

Utah 2025

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:

Utah Assistive Technology Program

State AT Program Title:

State AT Program URL

https://idrpp.usu.edu/uatp/

Mailing Address:

6855 Old Main Hill

City:

Logan

State:

Utah

Zip Code:

84322

Program Email:

bora.lee@usu.edu

Phone:

800-524-5152

TTY:

435-797-2355

Lead Agency

Agency Name:

Utah State University

Mailing Address:

Old Main Hill

City:

Logan

State:

Utah

Zip Code:

84322

Program URL:

https://www.usu.edu

Implementing Entity

Does your Lead Agency contract with an Implementing Entity to carry out the Statewide AT Program on its behalf? (Check if Yes)

Name of Implementing Agency:

Mailing Address:

City

State:

Zip Code:

Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):

Lee, Bora

Title:

Director

Phone:

435-797-6572

E-mail:

bora.lee@usu.edu

Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):

Lee, Bora

Title:

Director

Phone:

435-797-6572

E-mail:

bora.lee@usu.edu

Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:

Title:

Phone:

E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):

O'Crowley, Dan

Title:

AT Coordinator, Lead

Phone:

435-797-0699

E-mail:

dan.ocrowley@usu.edu

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):

Gill, Cindy

Title:

Grant & Contract Officer II & Subaward Team Lead

Phone:

435-797-1411

E-mail:

cindy.gill@usu.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing?

Yes

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program?

Yes

Loan Applications
	Metro RUCC 1-3	Non-Metro RUCC 4-9	Total
	Area of Residence		Total
Approved Loan made	26	03	29
Approved Not made	00	00	00
Rejected	00	00	00
Total	26	03	29

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income:	$14,400	Highest Income:	$233,988

Average Income
Sum of Incomes	Loans Made	Average Annual Income
$2,364,272	29	$81,527

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
	$15,000 or Less	$15,001- $30,000	$30,001- $45,000	$45,001- $60,000	$60,001- $75,000	$75,001 or More	Total
	Income Ranges						Total
Number of Loans	01	01	05	06	03	13	29
Percentage of Loans	3.45%	3.45%	17.24%	20.69%	10.34%	44.83%	100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan	Number of Loans	Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans	00	0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee	00	0%
With interest buy-down only	03	10.34%
With loan guarantee only	00	0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee	26	89.66%
Total	29	100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan	Number of Loans	Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans	00	$0
Partnership Loans	29	$219,990
Total	29	$219,990

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest	4%
Highest	5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates	Number of Loans Made	Average Interest Rate
112	29	3.86206896551724%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate	Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0%	00
2.1% to 4.0%	27
4.1% to 6.0%	02
6.1% to 8.0%	00
8.1% - 10.0%	00
10.1%-12.0%	00
12.1%-14.0%	00
14.1% +	00
Total	29

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT	Number of Devices Financed	Dollar Value of Loans
Vision	02	$7,550
Hearing	52	$146,880
Speech communication	00	$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental	00	$0
Mobility, seating and positioning	00	$0
Daily living	00	$0
Environmental adaptations	00	$0
Vehicle modification and transportation	02	$65,560
Computers and related	00	$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure	00	$0
Total	56	$219,990

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default	00
Net loss for loans in default	$0

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan?

Activity 1

How would you describe this state financing activity?

Last resort - Activity

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of Residence	Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)	74
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)	18
C. Total Served	92

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure	0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures	92

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / Service	Number of Devices Funded	Value of AT Provided
Vision	31	$6,063
Hearing	2	$850
Speech communication	5	$2,025
Learning, cognition, and developmental	0	$0
Mobility, seating and positioning	23	$7,373
Daily living	25	$6,997
Environmental adaptations	4	$1,625
Vehicle modification and transportation	2	$482
Computers and related	0	$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure	0	$0
Total	92	$25,415

C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan?

Activity 1

How would you describe this state financing activity?

AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program

2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served

County of Residence	Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)	86
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)	10
C. Total Served	96

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure	0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures	96

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / Service	Number Provided	Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price	Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold	Savings to Consumers
Vision	2	$600	$20	$580
Hearing	0	$0	$0	$0
Speech communication	5	$1,080	$55	$1,025
Learning, cognition, and developmental	9	$12,100	$2,410	$9,690
Mobility, seating and positioning	29	$9,300	$365	$8,935
Daily living	74	$7,030	$923	$6,107
Environmental adaptations	7	$17,100	$2,705	$14,395
Vehicle modification and transportation	0	$0	$0	$0
Computers and related	0	$0	$0	$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure	6	$9,300	$390	$8,910
Total	132	$56,510	$6,868	$49,642

D. Anecdote

Logan UATP fabricated a custom solution to help Logan City make its public pool accessible. The city had encountered compatibility issues between its gutter system and a pool lift they had purchased. UATP designed and built a durable custom base, allowing the lift to function safely and effectively. This solution enabled the city to meet accessibility requirements and ensured community members with mobility limitations could better participate in aquatic activities.

Brandon Griffin using the recently installed Logan Aquatic Center pool lift

Impact Area Education Employment Community Living

UATP provided financial assistance to restore critical mobility for Antony Melo. Living with multiple health and age-related conditions, Melo relies on a mobility scooter as his primary means of transportation. Through Active Re-entry, he has access to funding assistance for his mobility devices, but only every four years. When the scooter’s batteries began failing in the third year, without additional funding to replace the batteries, he faced increasing challenges accessing medical appointments and daily necessities, even getting stranded on some occasions. UATP helped Melo secure grant funding to purchase high-quality replacement batteries, and installed them, ensuring reliable transportation and renewed independence. This support preserved his autonomy and allowed him to maintain his health and quality of life within his community.

Impact Area Education Employment Community Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	15	47	111	173
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	08	04	26	38
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	02	02	04
4. Subtotal	23	53	139	215
5. None of the above	00	00	02	02
6. Subtotal	23	53	141	217
7. Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
8. Total	23	53	141	217
9. Performance on this measure	100%	100%	98.58%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	216	99.54%
Satisfied	01	0.46%
Satisfied somewhat	00	0%
Not at all satisfied	00	0%
Nonrespondent	00	0%
Total Surveyed	217
Response rate %	100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

Did your approved State Plan for this reporting period included conducting any device reuse activities?

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity	Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange	00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan	583
C. Total	583

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients.	00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures	583

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device	Total Estimated Current Purchase Price	Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged	Savings to Consumers
Vision	$0	$0	$0
Hearing	$0	$0	$0
Speech Communication	$0	$0	$0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	$0	$0	$0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	$0	$0	$0
Daily Living	$0	$0	$0
Environmental Adaptations	$0	$0	$0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation	$0	$0	$0
Computers and Related	$0	$0	$0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	$0	$0	$0
Total	$0	$0	$0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device	Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired	Total Estimated Current Purchase Price	Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold	Savings to Consumers
Vision	01	$300	$45	$255
Hearing	00	$0	$0	$0
Speech Communication	02	$210	$70	$140
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	08	$1,390	$135	$1,255
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	485	$284,027	$38,800	$245,227
Daily Living	59	$5,662	$1,630	$4,032
Environmental Adaptations	25	$23,230	$2,507	$20,723
Vehicle Modification & Transportation	06	$4,770	$150	$4,620
Computers and Related	00	$0	$0	$0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	08	$8,900	$1,655	$7,245
Total	594	$328,489	$44,992	$283,497

D. Anecdote

During a Southern Utah mobile clinic visit in Blanding, UT, UATP assisted Joyce Pherson in realigning and repairing the controller to her Quickie Edge power wheelchair. The device’s misaligned controller was causing collisions and progressive damage. After replacing missing mounting screws, adjusting the positioning to be more ergonomic, and undergoing function verification testing, Pherson regained full mobility and confidence in her wheelchair, ensuring her safety and participation in daily activities.

Wes Smith helping repair Joyce Pherson’s wheelchair controller.

Impact Area Education Employment Community Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	18	04	402	424
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	03	04	46	53
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	00	56	56
4. Subtotal	21	08	504	533
5. None of the above	00	01	36	37
6. Subtotal	21	09	540	570
7. Nonrespondent	01	00	12	13
8. Total	22	09	552	583
9. Performance on this measure	95.45%	88.89%	91.3%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	574	98.46%
Satisfied	03	0.51%
Satisfied somewhat	00	0%
Not at all satisfied	00	0%
Nonrespondent	06	1.03%
Total Surveyed	583
Response rate %	98.97%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

Did your approved State Plan for this reporting period included conducting Short-Term Device Loans?

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan	Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation)	281
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding	16
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation	211
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity	02
Total	510

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity	Number of Device Borrowers
Type of Individual or Entity	Desicion-making	All other Purposes	Total
Individuals with Disabilities	137	116	253
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives	90	92	182
Representative of Education	21	06	27
Representative of Employment	03	00	03
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	18	12	30
Representatives of Community Living	05	01	06
Representatives of Technology	07	02	09
Total	281	229	510

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days	27

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device	Number of Devices
Type of AT Device	Desicion-making	All other Purposes	Total
Vision	00	00	00
Hearing	02	00	02
Speech Communication	14	02	16
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	10	04	14
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	238	204	442
Daily Living	17	27	44
Environmental Adaptations	00	02	02
Vehicle Modification and Transportation	01	00	01
Computers and Related	02	00	02
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	37	03	40
Total	321	242	563

E. Anecdote

UATP loaned out an off-roading power wheelchair—able to handle grass, dirt, snow, and ice—to Melinda Thorton last fall. The wheelchair, which she nicknamed ‘The Beast,’ allowed her to use hiking trails for the first time is 15 years, which her everyday wheelchairs had difficulty navigating. While her wheelchairs gave Thornton independence, it was ‘The Beast’ that created access to safely explore the outdoors she loved with her adventurous dog. AT for recreation and leisure has a significant impact on users’ happiness, independence, and quality of life.

Melinda Thornton using the off-roading wheelchair on a trail.

Impact Area Education Employment Community Living

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	40	07	188	235
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	01	00	16	17
Subtotal	41	07	204	252
Have not made a decision	15	00	14	29
Subtotal	56	07	218	281
Nonrespondent	00	00	00	00
Total	56	07	218	281
Performance on this measure	73.21%	100%	93.58%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	11	03	122	136
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	02	01	06	09
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	01	72	73
4. Subtotal	13	05	200	218
5. None of the above	00	00	02	02
6. Subtotal	13	05	202	220
7. Nonrespondent	02	00	07	09
8. Total	15	05	209	229
9. Performance on this measure	100%	100%	99.01%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	495	97.06%
Satisfied	12	2.35%
Satisfied somewhat	02	0.39%
Not at all satisfied	00	0%
Nonrespondent	01	0.2%
Total Surveyed	510
Response rate %	99.8%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service	Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision	208
Hearing	06
Speech Communication	33
Learning, Cognition and Developmental	36
Mobility, Seating and Positioning	177
Daily Living	130
Environmental Adaptations	52
Vehicle Modification and Transportation	03
Computers and Related	51
Recreation, Sports and Leisure	84
Total # of Device Demonstrations	780

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant	Decision-Makers	Other Participants	Total
Individuals with Disabilities	711	278	989
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives	34	120	154
Representatives of Education	25	51	76
Representatives of Employment	02	09	11
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation	04	23	27
Representative of Community Living	03	20	23
Representative of Technology	01	60	61
Total	780	561	1,341

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity	Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program)	292
Service Provider	58
Vendor	551
Repair Service	02
Others	34
Total	937

D. Anecdote

UATP Logan facilitated a demonstration of the Zeen walker for George, an individual with Cerebral Palsy who had used a wheelchair for nearly three decades. The device was the “first real success” in walking again, according to his wife Lenore. It has also increased his functional mobility. UATP was able to connect George with alternative options when therapies, walkers with harnesses, and weight-supporting treadmills didn’t work for his needs.

Impact Area Education Employment Community Living

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	74	25	623	722
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	01	00	03	04
Subtotal	75	25	626	726
Have not made a decision	12	02	38	52
Subtotal	87	27	664	778
Nonrespondent	00	00	02	02
Total	87	27	666	780
Performance on this measure	86.21%	92.59%	93.99%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services	Number of Customers	Percent
Highly satisfied	1,223	91.2%
Satisfied	111	8.28%
Satisfied somewhat	02	0.15%
Not at all satisfied	03	0.22%
Nonrespondent	02	0.15%
Total	1,341
Response rate %	99.85%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.	44	54	635	733
2. AT was only available through the AT program.	13	09	78	100
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.	00	03	130	133
4. Subtotal	57	66	843	966
5. None of the above	00	01	40	41
6. Subtotal	57	67	883	1,007
7. Nonrespondent	03	00	19	22
8. Total	60	67	902	1,029
9. Performance on this measure	98.28%	94.03%	79.66%	81.67%
ACL Performance Measure				85%
Met/Not Met				Not Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response	Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed			Total
Response	Education	Employment	Community Living	Total
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs	114	32	811	957
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs	02	00	19	21
Subtotal	116	32	830	978
Have not made a decision	27	02	52	81
Subtotal	143	34	882	1,059
Nonrespondent	00	00	02	02
Total	143	34	884	1,061
Performance on this measure	81.12%	94.12%	93.89%	92.18%
ACL Performance Measure				90%
Met/Not Met				Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services	Percent	ACL Target	Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied	99.74%	95%	Met
Response Rate	99.66%	90%	Met

Educational/Training Activities

A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Educational/Training Activities by Participant Type
Type of Participant	Number
Individuals with Disabilities	1,044
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives	31
Representatives of Education	60
Representatives of Employment	39
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	291
Representatives of Community Living	25
Representatives of Technology	00
Unable to Categorize	45
TOTAL	1,535

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro	Non Metro	Unknown	TOTAL
1,363	132	40	1,535

B. Educational/Training Activity Topics

Educational/Training Activities by Topic
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities	Participants
AT Products/Services	395
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice	00
Combination of any/all of the above	975
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access	37
Transition	128
Total	1,535

C. Description of Educational/Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:

UATP Logan provided training to the Logan City Fire Department and Utah State University Facilities team on safely evacuating individuals using large power wheelchairs during emergencies. The training included testing out the power wheelchair ‘stretcher’ on stairs to simulate real scenarios. Elevators on the USU campus have gone down twice in the last six months with a wheelchair user not on the first floor, making this training a vital learning experience for emergency teams.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

2-4 transition students complete internships at UATP's fabrication facility each semester, increasing their problem solving skills, attention to detail, confidence with tools, and applied math experiences, preparing them with skills to pursue most any field of their interest.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

UATP trained an individual who is deaf to use the Sorenson sign language interpretation app on their cell phone so they can answer and make phone calls while away from the home. Previously they only used the Sorenson TV camera method. This is especially helpful as they are the caretaker for the other members of their family.

D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received	Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies	02
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented	35
No known outcome at this time	00
Nonrespondent	00
Total	37
Performance Measure Percentage	100%
ACL Target Percentage	70%
Met/Not Met	Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education	11%
Employment	00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation	49%
Community Living	40%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT)	00%
Total	100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

A public pool in Utah had a shallow pool with a roll-in ramp and a deeper pool with no access for individuals with disabilities. The pool had purchased a pool lift but unfortunately discovered the mounting system for the pool lift was incompatible with the gutter system. UATP developed an interface between the pool edge and the lift base, allowing it to be installed. Not only were the citizens and pool managers happy but also led to including UATP in some future planning and development projects to advise on ADA compliance.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. UATP Logan continues to engage university students and community members through 'Demo Days’, introducing them to AT and its real-world applications. As a result, attendees have started bringing their friends who would most benefit from UATP’s services. Additionally, an increased number of alumni have reached out from the field as they remember the lab and its services. ‘Demo Days’ have had a lasting effect in the community and have allowed for UATP to reach more people.

2. UATP Vernal attended the Annual Unity Fair organized by the interfaith coalition in Vernal and showcased various assistive technologies, including ‘Biscuit,’ the Joy For All robotic companion pet. The demonstration drew strong engagement, particularly among children with sensory processing differences. Their parents and caregivers noted immediate calming and positive effects, leading to meaningful conversations with attendees about the benefits of AT for all ages. The event successfully raised awareness and connected families with UATP’s services and resources.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients	AT Device/ Service	AT Funding	Total
Individuals with Disabilities	153	354	507
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives	78	166	244
Representative of Education	72	42	114
Representative of Employment	02	00	02
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation	121	39	160
Representative of Community Living	72	86	158
Representative of Technology	00	00	00
Unable to Categorize	00	00	00
Total	498	687	1,185

Referral Types:

One of the most effective strategies was the UATP mobile clinic, which allowed staff to meet people where they are, especially in rural, frontier, and underserved communities. By bringing AT demonstrations, device loans, and practical information directly to individuals and families, the mobile clinic created meaningful, face-to-face connections that often led to new referrals and ongoing follow-up. As more people experienced these services firsthand, referrals through word of mouth naturally increased. Consumers and family members who benefited from AT shared their experiences with others, reflecting growing trust in and recognition of the state AT program. UATP also expanded outreach and training for educators, rehabilitation counselors, aging service providers, and allied health professionals, which further increased referrals from these service networks. In addition, UATP raised visibility through its annual Assistive Technology Awareness event, which brought together community members, service organizations, and partners for hands-on demonstrations, resource sharing, and assistive technology exploration. These events created valuable opportunities to connect people to local supports, highlight the impact of assistive technology, and strengthen community partnerships. Together, these efforts expanded the reach of the state AT program and increased public awareness of available AT resources and services statewide.

Referral Sources:

UATP receives Information and Assistance referrals from a wide range of entities and practitioners across Utah, reflecting the program’s statewide reach and cross-sector partnerships. The largest share of referrals, estimated at approximately 35–40%, come directly from individuals with disabilities and family members, often through word of mouth following participation in mobile clinic visits, community events, or prior AT services. These referrals span both urban and rural areas, including frontier communities. Approximately 25–30% of referrals come from service providers, including educators, rehabilitation counselors, aging service providers, allied health professionals, and staff from community-based organizations. These referrals occur statewide and are supported through ongoing outreach, trainings, and collaborative partnerships. An estimated 15–20% of referrals originate from partner agencies, including Centers for Independent Living (CILs), Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs), including the Utah Center for Assistive Technology (UCAT). These partnerships provide broad geographic coverage and support individuals across employment, education, independent living, and aging services. The remaining 5–10% of referrals come from community outreach and public awareness efforts, such as Assistive Technology Awareness events, presentations, media outreach, and mobile clinic engagements. Together, these referral sources demonstrate strong statewide coverage and highlight opportunities to continue strengthening partnerships across disability, aging, education, health, and workforce systems.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Outreach was conducted with the State Education Agency *

Why was outreach not conducted? *

Outreach was not conducted with the State Education Agency during this reporting period because current coordination efforts remain focused at the individual level, supporting students with disabilities, their families, and educators. Utah already has assistive technology (AT) specialists embedded within each school district who are supported through the Department of Workforce Services (Utah Assistive Technology Teams). UATP’s current approach is to complement and support UATT by providing reso

Outreach was conducted with the Vocational Rehabilitation Agency *

Yes

Was collaboration implemented? *

Yes

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

UATP has established a strong partnership with the Utah Department of Workforce Services (DWS) Vocational Rehabilitation (VR), including the Utah Center for Assistive Technology (UCAT). UCAT operates within DWS VR as the state’s assistive technology resource, providing device demonstrations, evaluations, short-term loans, customization, and technical support. Through this partnership, UATP coordinates on device demonstrations, device reuse, and device loans, strengthening information sharing and expanding access to assistive technology (AT) devices and services for individuals with disabilities.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative?

UATP increased consumer access to assistive technology (AT) by expanding opportunities for device demonstrations, short-term loans, and device reuse. Referrals between programs improved, reducing duplication of services and helping consumers access the most appropriate AT resources more efficiently. As a result, consumers and professionals gained clearer pathways to AT services across employment, education, and community settings.

2.a Please include URL for initiative if available

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Employment, Transportation, Community Participation and Integration, Recreation/Leisure,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan, Demo, Training,

Outreach was conducted with the Aging Agency *

Yes

Was collaboration implemented? *

Yes

Outreach was conducted in collaboration with the Five County Area Agency on Aging to increase awareness and utilization of assistive technology (AT) for older adults in Southern Utah. UATP also participated in AAA–hosted conferences and community events, offered AT demonstrations and consultation, and provided educational resources to case managers and caregivers. This partnership benefited older adults and caregivers statewide, particularly those in rural and frontier regions in Southern Utah, by improving awareness of available AT services and strengthening referral pathways. Activities were supported by UATP operational funding and additional leveraged funding, including resources from the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, to enhance service capacity and outreach efforts.

The partnership increased access to AT by connecting more individuals to UATP services and establishing a stronger referral pipeline between AAAs and UATP. Awareness of AT expanded meaningfully as Five County AAA shared UATP resources and integrated information into community outreach and case management. UATP’s presence in rural communities increased, resulting in stronger engagement and more timely access to device support. Lessons learned include the importance of maintaining frequent communication and early planning for event scheduling. Although UATP does not receive direct funding through the AAA, the partnership has demonstrated value and justified continued collaboration. With sustained effort and the potential to secure additional external funding, this initiative is expected to continue and further expand outreach in rural and frontier communities. For replication, we recommend leveraging trusted local aging organizations to connect with underserved populations and to support future resource development.

2.a Please include URL for initiative if available

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education, Recreation/Leisure, Health, Aging, Aging and Disability Network/No Wrong Door, Veterans,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan, Demo, Reuse, State Financing, Training, Information & Assistance, Public Awareness,

Outreach was conducted with the Medicaid Agency *

Why was outreach not conducted? *

Outreach efforts were not conducted during this reporting period due to significant challenges in coordinating with the Medicaid agency. Identifying the appropriate points of contact and securing alignment took longer than anticipated.

Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source	Amount	Use of Funds	Data Reported
Federal	$5,518	Technical Assistance	True
Private	$6,666	Device Loan	True
Private	$2,180	Reuse	True
State Appropriations	$5,816	Device Loan	True
Private	$15,407	Reuse	True
Private	$66,667	Reuse	True
State Appropriations	$11,632	Demonstration	True
Private	$9,999	Demonstration	True
Private	$1,833	Training	True
State Appropriations	$93,055	Reuse	True
Private	$200	State Financing	True
Private	$31,036	Reuse	True
State Appropriations	$5,816	Public Awareness, I&A	True
Public/State Agency	$35,369	State Financing	True
Public/State Agency	$4,000	Public Awareness, I&A	True
	Amount: $295,194

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.

B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award

All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report.

The status of these funds at the end of the FY25 (September 30, 2025) is as follows: (Check one) We did not utilize this funding. (Do not complete this section.)
We expended all or some of this funding (Complete the section below)

Please report the total amount expended (drawn down and liquidated) from FY22 through FY25:

$80,000.00

Please check all position types that were supported with these funds over the period of FY22-25. This can be a direct employee or contractual position.

Please describe the activities of the above FTE and how such activities advance public health.

The Public Health Worker Grant has played a crucial role in supporting UATP by enabling specialized roles and activities that enhance accessibility and independence for individuals with disabilities. The activities supported include: 1. Assistive Technology Specialist: Customizes and repairs devices to ensure they are functional and tailored to individual users. This specialist also delivers training to individuals, families, and health professionals on using assistive technologies (AT). 2. Information and Assistance Specialist: Provides one-on-one consultations to help individuals navigate available resources and services related to AT. This role involves developing and maintaining a comprehensive database of community resources and offering follow-up support to ensure individuals successfully access and utilize these resources. 3. Outreach and Awareness Specialist: Promotes UATP services through community events, workshops, and digital campaigns to raise awareness about assistive technology. This specialist engages with underserved populations, including those in rural and minority communities, to address specific accessibility needs. 4. Technology Expert: Introduces and supports mobile device use, particularly for virtual doctor visits. 5. Program Manager: Oversees the activities funded by the Public Health Worker grant and ensures that these activities align with the goals of the Assistive Technology Act.

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).