Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 137 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 16 |
| C. Total Served | 153 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 153 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 119 | $9,288 | $0 | $9,288 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 44 | $2,200 | $396 | $1,804 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 108 | $8,425 | $1,026 | $7,399 |
| Total | 271 | $19,913 | $1,422 | $18,491 |
In November 2024, SCATP conducted its 6th annual Adapted Toy Workshop, a two-day hands-on AT fabrication initiative that increased access to affordable, customized assistive technology for children with disabilities. In partnership with a local high school innovation center’s 3D printing and design program (R2I2), families, service providers, and educators received instruction on toy adaptation, while students supported fabrication stations and produced two types of 3D-printed switches used to operate the toys. Through this initiative, 90 toys were adapted, resulting in an estimated cost savings of $6,252 and expanded access to play-based assistive technology. In April 2025, SCATP hosted its 3rd annual Adapted Book Workshop, a two-day AT fabrication activity focused on inclusive literacy access. Participants learned to create flexible adapted book kits designed for use by children with a range of disabilities, addressing limitations of traditional single-disability adaptations. SCATP staff provided hands-on instruction using two children’s books selected for tactile adaptation potential and alignment with a state museum’s Accessibility Morning program and a vendor’s literacy planner. The workshop resulted in 44 adapted book kits, generating an estimated cost savings of $1,804 while increasing participant capacity to fabricate inclusive assistive technology solutions.
In March 2025, during the 33rd annual Assistive Technology Expo, SCATP launched its first annual Makers Space within the vendor hall to expand hands-on access to assistive technology fabrication. SCATP partnered with a local high school innovation center’s 3D printing and design program (R2I2), along with volunteer support and sponsorship from BlueCross BlueShield of South Carolina, to deliver this interactive experience. The 2025 Makers Space focused on PVC-based fabrication, enabling participants to create 101 customized assistive technology devices, including tablet holders, eye-gaze frame boards, and a sentence-making tool. This initiative increased participant capacity to design and fabricate low-cost, functional AT solutions that support communication, access, and independence.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 22 | 00 | 00 | 22 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 131 | 00 | 00 | 131 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 153 | 00 | 00 | 153 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 153 | 00 | 00 | 153 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 153 | 00 | 00 | 153 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | NaN% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 153 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 153 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 03 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 136 |
| C. Total | 139 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 06 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 133 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
6 clients were excluded from the performance measure due to involvement of school under IDEA, nursing home under Medicaid, and being a VR client. These entities are obligated to provide AT.
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 02 | $4,241 | $0 | $4,241 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $20,000 | $6,000 | $14,000 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 03 | $24,241 | $6,000 | $18,241 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 03 | $3,236 | $0 | $3,236 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 04 | $2,778 | $0 | $2,778 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 04 | $560 | $0 | $560 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 189 | $190,923 | $0 | $190,923 |
| Daily Living | 70 | $8,327 | $0 | $8,327 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 01 | $1,100 | $0 | $1,100 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | $5,185 | $0 | $5,185 |
| Total | 273 | $212,109 | $0 | $212,109 |
A family caregiver contacted the South Carolina Assistive Technology Program (SCATP) seeking immediate assistance for her 83-year-old grandmother, who had low vision, was hard of hearing, and used a wheelchair. Through SCATP’s Assistive Technology Reuse program, the caregiver received gently used durable medical equipment—including a bath seat, bedside commode, and wheelchair—at no cost. Access to these devices addressed an immediate unmet need, improved safety and daily functioning, and avoided hundreds of dollars in out-of-pocket expenses not covered by private insurance. In addition to device provision, SCATP staff delivered individualized assistance by answering questions and connecting the caregiver to additional borrowing and reuse options as needs evolved. Following the grandmother’s passing, the caregiver returned the equipment to SCATP so it could be redistributed, extending the useful life of the devices and supporting program sustainability. This experience demonstrates how SCATP’s Reuse services increase access to assistive technology, generate cost savings, promote efficient use of resources, and support families who might otherwise lack access to essential assistive devices.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 00 | 88 | 93 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 00 | 19 | 23 |
| 4. Subtotal | 09 | 00 | 111 | 120 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 13 | 13 |
| 6. Subtotal | 09 | 00 | 124 | 133 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 09 | 00 | 124 | 133 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 89.52% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 136 | 97.84% |
| Satisfied | 03 | 2.16% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 139 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 116 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 05 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 04 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 04 |
| Total | 129 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 31 | 02 | 33 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 51 | 06 | 57 |
| Representative of Education | 18 | 01 | 19 |
| Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 13 | 03 | 16 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 03 | 01 | 04 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 116 | 13 | 129 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 32 | 02 | 34 |
| Hearing | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Speech Communication | 71 | 06 | 77 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 15 | 01 | 16 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 | 02 | 08 |
| Daily Living | 17 | 22 | 39 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 | 02 | 03 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Computers and Related | 13 | 00 | 13 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | 01 | 05 |
| Total | 160 | 36 | 196 |
Christian is a 15-year-old student who was referred to the South Carolina Assistive Technology Program (SCATP) during a re-evaluation of his augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) needs by his educational services team. Through SCATP’s device demonstration and loan programs, Christian was able to trial multiple AAC devices and access methods, including eye-gaze technology, to identify the most effective communication solution. Christian and his family also expanded their knowledge of AAC devices and switch options through SCATP loaner program, webinars, and Expo events. As a result of SCATP’s individualized support, Christian is now using his personal AAC device more effectively with both eye-gaze and switch access. Most recently, SCATP’s loan program enabled the family to borrow a floor stand mount essential for effective use of the device during speech therapy sessions. The family continues to rely on SCATP’s device loan services and reports increased confidence and success in supporting Christian’s communication needs.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 53 | 01 | 36 | 90 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 00 | 05 | 07 |
| Subtotal | 55 | 01 | 41 | 97 |
| Have not made a decision | 15 | 00 | 04 | 19 |
| Subtotal | 70 | 01 | 45 | 116 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 70 | 01 | 45 | 116 |
| Performance on this measure | 78.57% | 100% | 91.11% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 00 | 00 | 02 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 01 | 04 | 10 |
| 4. Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 05 | 13 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 05 | 13 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 07 | 01 | 05 | 13 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 118 | 91.47% |
| Satisfied | 09 | 6.98% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.78% |
| Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.78% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 129 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 35 |
| Hearing | 04 |
| Speech Communication | 145 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 18 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
| Daily Living | 07 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 05 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 30 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 244 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 193 | 03 | 196 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 04 | 158 | 162 |
| Representatives of Education | 03 | 65 | 68 |
| Representatives of Employment | 02 | 12 | 14 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 30 | 187 | 217 |
| Representative of Community Living | 11 | 136 | 147 |
| Representative of Technology | 01 | 21 | 22 |
| Total | 244 | 582 | 826 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 197 |
| Service Provider | 59 |
| Vendor | 237 |
| Repair Service | 05 |
| Others | 06 |
| Total | 504 |
Laura, a resident of NHC Mauldin Retirement and Assisted Living, experienced increasing difficulty communicating with her family due to challenges associated with her Parkinson’s COPA diagnosis. To address this unmet need, Laura’s daughter contacted the South Carolina Assistive Technology Program (SCATP) seeking guidance. Through SCATP’s device demonstration services, the Program Director provided an in-person demonstration of multiple communication applications that support text-based and speech-generating communication. This hands-on experience enabled Laura to compare options, actively participate in decision-making, and identify the application that best met her functional communication needs. Following the demonstration, SCATP provided individualized assistance to increase access to assistive technology, working with Laura’s daughter to explore device acquisition options. With SCATP’s guidance, the family successfully applied to the Amplify Life program through the South Carolina Equipment Distribution Program (SCEDP). As a result, Laura received an iPad equipped with her selected communication application at no cost. This outcome reflects the effectiveness of SCATP’s device demonstration services in supporting informed decision-making, access to appropriate technology, and successful acquisition, resulting in improved communication, increased social connection, and enhanced participation in daily life.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 110 | 07 | 95 | 212 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 110 | 07 | 96 | 213 |
| Have not made a decision | 09 | 06 | 16 | 31 |
| Subtotal | 119 | 13 | 112 | 244 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 119 | 13 | 112 | 244 |
| Performance on this measure | 92.44% | 53.85% | 85.71% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 814 | 98.55% |
| Satisfied | 12 | 1.45% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 826 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 27 | 00 | 89 | 116 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 133 | 00 | 04 | 137 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 09 | 01 | 23 | 33 |
| 4. Subtotal | 169 | 01 | 116 | 286 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 13 | 13 |
| 6. Subtotal | 169 | 01 | 129 | 299 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 169 | 01 | 129 | 299 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 94.67% | 0% | 72.09% | 84.62% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 163 | 08 | 131 | 302 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 00 | 06 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 165 | 08 | 137 | 310 |
| Have not made a decision | 24 | 06 | 20 | 50 |
| Subtotal | 189 | 14 | 157 | 360 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 189 | 14 | 157 | 360 |
| Performance on this measure | 87.3% | 57.14% | 87.26% | 86.11% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.84% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 100% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 260 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 282 |
| Representatives of Education | 880 |
| Representatives of Employment | 252 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 448 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 286 |
| Representatives of Technology | 39 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 2,447 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2,068 | 374 | 05 | 2,447 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 1,657 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 100 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 641 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 43 |
| Transition | 06 |
| Total | 2,447 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
The SC Assistive Technology Program collaborated with the State Department of Education’s (SCDOE) Assistive Technology staff member to host the 7th annual Assistive Technology Leadership Conference (ATLC). The SCATP program director collaborated with a national level speaker from the Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST), a national nonprofit organization that specializes in applied special technologies and universal design for learning. This training day consisted of three 1-hour presentations, and 3 breakout group discussions with real-time collaboration. There were nearly 80 in attendance for the morning session from representing multiple counties and school districts in SC. The sessions targeted specifically the federal guidance on Assistive Technology issued in January of 2024 and accessibility. The session speakers shared aspects of implementing assistive technology and valuable resources for school district assistive technology teams working with individuals with developmental disabilities, learning disabilities, and physical disabilities. The attendance for those who attended the full day of educational activities was 63 participants who increased their knowledge of assistive technology and accessibility because of attending this training event.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
An SCATP team member is an active member of the interagency team for the state's Youth Transition Forum (YLF) assisting in organizing and planning the training and educational activities for the multi-day event and conducts one of the training sessions for AT in employment. For the event held during this reporting, the SCATP Program Director presented an interactive session at YLF assisting 20 attendees to understand AT as it relates to independence and employment goals.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A presentation on accessibility was made available and advertised statewide to all attendees at the state’s AT Expo in March of 2025. SCATP partnered with the SC State Department of Education (SCDOE) to put on the education session entitled: The Americans with Disabilities Act Updated Digital Requirements. The session addressed the fact that many people access services, activities and programs provided by state and local governments digitally through websites, and more importantly the digital content they are accessing must be accessible to all. In this presentation, the discussion focused on the updated ADA digital requirements. The 39 Attendees were able to view examples of accessible vs. inaccessible digital content and explore resources available to facilitate accessible digital content.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 40 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 03 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 43 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
| Education | 54% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 01% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 09% |
| Community Living | 31% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 05% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The SCATP program director is an active serving on the state’s interagency Tech First Team in a leadership role. During this reporting period, the team was able to get the state of SC to pass a resolution making SC a Tech First state. While the initiative, at first only included the words “enabling technology”, under the education and leadership guidance from the SCATP program director, “assistive technology” wording and definitions were added to the resolution, which was passed and fully adopted by both the senate and house representatives in April 2025. In addition to those key definitions, other key elements of the resolution include: 1.Recognizing technology as a critical part of service delivery for individuals with disabilities. 2.Encouraging collaboration across state agencies, providers, and technology developers. 3.Promoting training and education for providers, families, and individuals to increase tech literacy and adoption. 4.Supporting workforce development thro
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Two SCATP team members are active members of the South Carolina Endeavors for Transition Resources and Interagency Collaboration (SCENTRIC) team meeting monthly. The mission of SCENTRIC is to ensure students with disabilities in South Carolina are prepared for independent living and employment by focusing on providing resources, addressing the needs of interagency teams, and building capacity through collaboration. The SCATP program director serves as member of the Leadership Team for SCENTRIC and leads the Outreach and Training subcommittee. The program director also, attended the national 2025 Capacity Building Institute (CBI), hosted by the Collaborative's National Technical Assistance Center on Transition (NTACT:C) as part of a delegation of SC transition leadership team. Another SCATP staff member has served as a subcommittee member for different subcommittees for SCENTRIC during this reporting period.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The South Carolina Assistive Technology Expo is a long-standing, highly anticipated public awareness initiative that has served South Carolinians for over three decades. Now in its 33rd year, the Expo increases statewide knowledge of assistive technology and access to related services by providing individuals with disabilities, family members, caregivers, and professionals the opportunity to explore emerging technologies, evidence-based solutions, and practical applications that support independence and community participation. In 2025, the Expo featured 12 educational training sessions addressing current assistive technology issues, service delivery, and real-world integration. A total of 870 individuals attended, and 95% of participants reported increased awareness of assistive technology issues and available resources, demonstrating the Expo’s sustained impact in expanding access to information, strengthening service connections, and supporting informed decision-making.
2. During the reporting period, SCATP program staff implemented targeted community outreach through exhibits and participation in state-level events and conferences to expand awareness of assistive technology and SCATP services. These direct, face-to-face public awareness activities reached more than 1,800 South Carolinians and resulted in the distribution of over 2,700 assistive technology informational materials, including brochures and flyers. As a direct outcome of these efforts, SCATP experienced increased demand for services, reflected in higher referral rates, growth in listserv membership, and increased participation in training and educational opportunities statewide.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 149 | 75 | 224 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 158 | 56 | 214 |
| Representative of Education | 186 | 27 | 213 |
| Representative of Employment | 07 | 01 | 08 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 187 | 63 | 250 |
| Representative of Community Living | 131 | 29 | 160 |
| Representative of Technology | 51 | 05 | 56 |
| Unable to Categorize | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Total | 870 | 256 | 1,126 |
SCATP is a resource for the SC Department of Education, Hospitals, clinics, and residential healthcare facilities, Centers for Independent Living (CILs), and the SC Department on Aging as we provide several outreach opportunities and continuing educational hours for these professionals such as our monthly assistive technology webinar series; yearly adapted toy and book workshops; statewide AT Expo; and AT Leadership Conference offered in partnership with the SC State Department of Education. SCATP has also been a resource providing assistance to the SC Department of Disabilities and Special Needs (DDSN), now known as the SC Department of Behavior Health and Developmental Disabilities (BHDD-OIDD), and has partnered with BHDD-OIDD to bring an 2-part workshop series on AT for communication to 4 BHDD-OIDD regions in the state which increased the number of referrals and AT awareness. 18% of our referrals come from health care agencies, 15% of our referrals come from education agencies, and 8% come from CIL(s). Over 12% of our referrals come from our state AT website and online outreach, such as our listserv that has over 6800 subscribers.
SCATP is a resource for families, educators, health care professionals, staff of Centers for Independent Living (CILs), staff of the SC Department on Aging, and staff of the SC Department of Behavior Health and Developmental Disabilities (BHDD-OIDD) as we provide several outreach opportunities and continuing educational hours for these professionals such as our monthly assistive technology webinar series; yearly adapted toy and book workshops; statewide AT Expo; and AT Leadership Conference offered in partnership with the SC State Department of Education. SCATP has BHDD-OIDD to provide customized training specific to their needs to increase staff knowledge and awareness of AT for communication. This has increased our number of referrals by those providers. 65% of our referrals come from providers; 20% of our referrals come from public awareness and other community outreach activities; and 14% of our referrals come from past AT Program consumers.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $41,556 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Public/State Agency | $13,500 | Training | True |
| Amount: $55,056 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||