Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 81 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
| C. Total Served | 81 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 81 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 69 | $39,485 |
| Speech communication | 3 | $2,359 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 1 | $699 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 9 | $7,231 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 82 | $49,774 |
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
Consumer is a 95-year-old client who lives independently. Consumer originally received an amplified telephone from our Adaptive Telephone Loan Program (ATEL). Consumer learned about an upcoming training on Smart Phones at his local Senior Center and decided to attend. Consumer attended an ATEL presentation on Challenges and Solutions of Older Adults and Technology. At this presentation, consumer learned that iPhone accessibility for seniors includes features like Assistive Access, which simplifies the home screen with larger buttons and limited apps, and general accessibility settings such as magnification, Voice Control, and simplified touch gestures. These features can help consumer remain more independent. Consumer has a hearing loss so he is eligible for the ATEL program. As part of the program, consumer is attending ATEL's monthly Technology Training sessions at East Providence Senior Center. Consumer reports to love the phone and its features.
A home visit was conducted with a 93-year-old man who had previously received an amplified phone from Adaptive Telephone Loan Program (ATEL). He contacted ATEL to report that he was having more difficulty hearing on it. Given his advanced age it would have been easy to conclude that the issue was increased hearing loss. The home visit allowed ATEL to test the phone. It was determined that indeed even with the volume set to max, it sounded a bit muted. It is plausible that the speaker in the headset had degraded over the years. The Equipment was replaced with the same model phone (brand new) and the consumer reported he could hear better on it. It was noted that even though he could hear better he was still struggling with some communication. ATEL provided the consumer with information about a caption phone that does not require he have an internet connection. Consumer reached out to ATEL inquiring on a demonstration of a captioning phone. By doing a home visit ATEL was able to observe firsthand that the phone was no longer operating as it should. It also allowed for a conversation with the consumer to make him aware of other options should the replacement phone prove to be not enough to aid in communication and independence.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 79 | 81 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 79 | 81 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 79 | 81 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 02 | 79 | 81 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 80 | 98.77% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 1.23% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 81 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 06 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 43 |
| C. Total | 49 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 49 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 04 | $7,050 | $0 | $7,050 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 02 | $100 | $0 | $100 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 06 | $7,150 | $0 | $7,150 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 09 | $2,010 | $0 | $2,010 |
| Speech Communication | 03 | $2,700 | $0 | $2,700 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 28 | $2,729 | $0 | $2,729 |
| Daily Living | 13 | $1,073 | $0 | $1,073 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 11 | $1,290 | $0 | $1,290 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 02 | $173 | $0 | $173 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 66 | $9,975 | $0 | $9,975 |
Ocean State Center for Independent Living (OSCIL) received a generous donation from a community member—an adjustable platform rising bed in excellent condition. Thanks to the efforts of our Assistive Technology Access Partnership (ATAP) staff, the bed quickly found a new home with an OSCIL consumer in need. The recipient is an 81-year-old woman living independently in Warwick. She faces several medical challenges, including COPD, spinal stenosis, severe arthritis, hypertension, and macular degeneration. Her previous electric bed, which helped her breathe more easily by elevating her upper body, had stopped working the year before. Since then, she had been sleeping propped up with six pillows just to breathe comfortably at night. OSCIL staff coordinated the delivery of the donated bed to her home. The impact was immediate and profound.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 36 | 36 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 12 | 12 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 48 | 48 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 48 | 48 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 00 | 49 | 49 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 97.96% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 48 | 97.96% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 2.04% |
| Total Surveyed | 49 | |
| Response rate % | 97.96% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 92 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 03 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 09 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 06 |
| Total | 110 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 52 | 08 | 60 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Representative of Education | 30 | 06 | 36 |
| Representative of Employment | 02 | 01 | 03 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 01 | 02 | 03 |
| Representatives of Technology | 01 | 01 | 02 |
| Total | 92 | 18 | 110 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 21 | 01 | 22 |
| Hearing | 19 | 07 | 26 |
| Speech Communication | 15 | 06 | 21 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 17 | 03 | 20 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 | 03 | 12 |
| Daily Living | 12 | 03 | 15 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 04 | 04 | 08 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 62 | 04 | 66 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | 01 | 05 |
| Total | 163 | 32 | 195 |
Consumer contacted ATAP partner needing assistance working with a deaf student. Consumer is a teacher at a local school. This teacher works with deaf and hard of hearing students in public schools. She contacted ATAP because one of her students had a project which involved taking care of an infant simulator doll. These dolls are designed to behave like real babies by crying, burping, and requiring 'feeding' and diapering, to try to deter teen pregnancy. Since the student is deaf, she needed to find a way to be able to be notified that the baby is crying to participate with her fellow classmates. This proved to be difficult as the student cannot hear when/if the baby is crying. She contacted ATAP inquiring if there was any type of Assistive Technology that could help. ATAP partners met to brainstorm possible Assistive Technology solutions. Different strategies and AT equipment such as various alerting devices were discussed. Student borrowed three devices from the AT Loan Library. It was recommended she borrow an Apple Watch, Flashing Baby Monitors and a Shake-a-Wake Alarm with Bed Shaker and Baby Sound Transmitter. Student used the accessibility feature on her watch to vibrate when it hears a baby cry; however, the vibration wasn’t enough to wake her at night. Then she used a baby monitor that flashes a light to indicate the baby is crying; however, the flash was not on This AT Equipment allowed the student to recognize when her baby was crying by a flash. The student was so happy that she would be able to participate in the class like her peers. The Assistive Technology equipment that was loaned to the student for this project was an easy mid tech solution that worked out very well. She was able to fully participate and complete the class with her peers.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 48 | 00 | 18 | 66 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 01 | 04 | 09 |
| Subtotal | 52 | 01 | 22 | 75 |
| Have not made a decision | 13 | 00 | 03 | 16 |
| Subtotal | 65 | 01 | 25 | 91 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| Total | 66 | 01 | 25 | 92 |
| Performance on this measure | 80% | 100% | 88% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 00 | 03 | 08 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 4. Subtotal | 06 | 01 | 08 | 15 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| 6. Subtotal | 06 | 02 | 08 | 16 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
| 8. Total | 07 | 02 | 09 | 18 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 50% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 98 | 89.09% |
| Satisfied | 11 | 10% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.91% |
| Total Surveyed | 110 | |
| Response rate % | 99.09% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 08 |
| Hearing | 11 |
| Speech Communication | 08 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 09 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 14 |
| Daily Living | 07 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 06 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 10 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 73 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 39 | 16 | 55 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 06 | 04 | 10 |
| Representatives of Education | 24 | 25 | 49 |
| Representatives of Employment | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| Representative of Community Living | 02 | 03 | 05 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 73 | 50 | 123 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 29 |
| Service Provider | 06 |
| Vendor | 09 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 02 |
| Total | 46 |
A consumer contact ATAP partner agency TechAccess to request a demonstration of different AT tools to help support her elementary school-aged son's reading and math development. The demonstration was scheduled and during the session, the Scanning Pen and the ArthimeType Math Keyboard were demonstrated. This keyboard helps to simplify the process of typing math. The hardware keyboard conveniently locates the numbers, operations, common math letters and symbols in one plug-and-play device that works alongside students own computer. Both the parents and the student were impressed by the equipment and felt like this could be a good solution for some help with his learning difficulties. Following the demonstration, the parents requested a more comprehensive assistive technology(AT) evaluation to be conducted at her son’s school. The ArthimeType keyboard is a newly acquired device at TechACCESS, purchased after one of the clinicians discovered it at the annual ATIA conference.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 23 | 01 | 25 | 49 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 01 | 05 | 07 |
| Subtotal | 24 | 02 | 30 | 56 |
| Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 12 | 13 |
| Subtotal | 25 | 02 | 42 | 69 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
| Total | 26 | 02 | 45 | 73 |
| Performance on this measure | 92.31% | 100% | 66.67% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 113 | 91.87% |
| Satisfied | 08 | 6.5% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 1.63% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 123 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 02 | 118 | 125 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 01 | 01 | 03 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 16 | 16 |
| 4. Subtotal | 06 | 03 | 135 | 144 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| 6. Subtotal | 06 | 04 | 135 | 145 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
| 8. Total | 07 | 04 | 137 | 148 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 75% | 87.5% | 87.67% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 71 | 01 | 43 | 115 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 05 | 02 | 09 | 16 |
| Subtotal | 76 | 03 | 52 | 131 |
| Have not made a decision | 14 | 00 | 15 | 29 |
| Subtotal | 90 | 03 | 67 | 160 |
| Nonrespondent | 02 | 00 | 03 | 05 |
| Total | 92 | 03 | 70 | 165 |
| Performance on this measure | 83.52% | 100% | 74.29% | 79.88% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.17% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 99.45% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 716 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
| Representatives of Education | 117 |
| Representatives of Employment | 00 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 00 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 00 |
| Representatives of Technology | 03 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 836 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 614 | 221 | 01 | 836 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 715 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 11 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 109 |
| Transition | 01 |
| Total | 836 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Rhode Island ATAP collaborated on a training with the Rhode Island Governors Commission on Disabilities. This training was presented by RI ATAP and RI Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired. The training was in the form of a webinar and it focused on consumers who are Blind and Visually Impaired and/or Deaf and Hard of Hearing who want to learn more about how Assistive Technology is utilized in the Workplace. Topics for this training included: Benefits of AT in the Workplace, The ADA and Reasonable Accommodations, Review of the Job Accommodation Network, Workplace Accommodations for deaf and hard of hearing, Assistive Listening Devices, Captioning, CART, Video Remote Interpreting, Telecommunication, Relay Services, Captioning Telephones, Workplace Alerting and Community Resources. The webinar was widely attended and circulated. It remains on the Governors Commission Website as a resource. This was the first collaboration of its kind with the Governors Commission and Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired and because of the success, we certainly plan to continue to collaborate on future projects.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
One impactful training related to Transition that was held focused on Accessible Reading Materials. This training was presented by TechACCESS, an ATAP partner, and provided to a few local school districts. This session was developed to explore tools and strategies to ensure that all students, including those with print disabilities, can access curriculum content effectively. As part of this training, TechACCESS demonstrated and showcased several of their accessible kits housed within the Rhode Island Materials Access Center (RIMAC) at TechACCESS. The training highlighted the range of adaptive tools and technologies available to support inclusive learning for all ages and abilities. The kits are available for distribution to school districts through the RIMAC Library. This type of training is impactful because besides the information presented and the kits available, the training itself is presented to Teachers including Special Educators, OT's, and Speech Therapist's. It reaches a wide variety of professionals who work with students with disabilities in Transition.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Rhode Island's Cyber-Seniors Program along with one of RI ATAP's partners, the Adaptive Telephone Loan Program ATEL have been offering one-on-one intergenerational technology training throughout the state to help bridge the digital divide that many older adults experience effecting communication. Together, they have collaborated on a new project and hosted a series of 8 workshops which will last 1-2 hours at limited locations around the state. These workshops feature group learning focused on building a new skills with their smartphone or tablets (Apple or Android), followed by individualized mentoring to coach consumer as they practice new communication skills. Some of the topics covered at these workshops are: Workshop 1: Accessibility Features (font size, visual tweaks, captioning, sound amplification, visual or vibration alerts, ringtones, sound notifications) Workshop 2: Camera (taking and sending pictures, videos, selfies; scanning QR codes; using camera for magnification) Workshop 3: Virtual assistants (use of Siri or Hey Google to send text, search the web, make a phone call, ask about the weather, etc.) Workshop 4: As requested by participants APPS (for example, downloading and using apps, social media). These workshops have been invaluable in helping to promote using Assistive Technology like smartphones to better communicate.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 107 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 02 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 109 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
| Education | 35% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 00% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 65% |
| Community Living | 00% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
One of ATAP's partner agencies, Ocean State Center for Independent Living (OSCIL) provided technical assistance to four Rehabilitation Organizations in various parts of the state. The purpose was to educate staff and provide technical assistance on various Assistive Technology devices and services to better improve services to their consumers. Topics reviewed with staff at each facility include: AT devices for mobility, Daily living, Communication, Home safety, and Health monitoring. Examples discussed range from physical aids like wheelchairs and grab bars to digital tools such as voice-activated lights, hearing aids, screen readers, and personal emergency alert systems. These technologies help individuals perform daily tasks with greater independence, safety, and quality of life. Community resources for devices and services were also provided to the staff at each facility.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
One of ATAP's partner agencies, West Bay Collaborative provided technical assistance to a particular school district. The school was looking for help identifying solutions for students who have significant ADD, ADHD, and various distraction issues. Some of these students and young adults require some noise cancelling equipment and distraction of quiet or music during their school day to help with productivity and work process. West Bay Collaborative met with staff and made some recommendations such as Air Bone Conduction Headphones. These particular headphones are equipped with Al features that can be great for students that need some alternate noise and music while eliminating distraction and maintaining attention to tasks. The school and district were provided with some Technical Assistance and information on resources and devices.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. One of ATAP's Partner agencies, TechACCESS held an Open House on November 6, 2024. At this event, TechACCESS showcased their assistive technology and services to the community. The event had over 40 attendees. Participants joined actively in lively discussions about TechACCESS services. One attendee remarked, “I am so glad you did this event; I had no idea of all the great things you are doing here.” A former client and presently a service community member added, “Thanks for all you did for me and continue to do for our community.” “What amazing things you do. TechACCESS is helping many who otherwise miss out on the helpful things you offer to give their lives a second chance at learning, healing, a sense of independence, and communication.” This event serves as a way to get the message out to the community about Assistive Technology and the services available.
2. The ATAP partners hosted our first Assistive Technology Awareness Expo. The event was held on March 20, 2025, at the Radisson Hotel in Warwick. This inaugural event provided attendees with the opportunity to explore a wide range of assistive technology products and services aimed at enhancing independence and quality of life for individuals with disabilities, and fostered networking among members of the assistive technology community, enabling attendees to share experiences and learn about the latest innovations in the field. ATAP Partner, TechACCESS staff facilitated hands-on activities in a Maker Space, allowing participants to create their own "Assistive Technology tools". We had over 130 attendees at the event and 23 vendor tables set up. The vendor tables were loaded with equipment for participants to try out. Some of the vendors include: T-Mobile Accessibility, Crick Software, PRC-Saltillo, Hamilton Relay, Talking Books, Mobility Recyclers, Tobi Dynavox, VoiceItt by the Babel Group, Easter Seals, RI Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Lift & Care Systems, RI Governors Commission on Disabilities, Insight, Sherlock Center, Mobius Mobility, New England Low Vision, and HipMe. This was a very successful event and is helping RI to gear up for the 2025 New England AT Conference scheduled for November.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 301 | 100 | 401 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 82 | 31 | 113 |
| Representative of Education | 74 | 02 | 76 |
| Representative of Employment | 25 | 06 | 31 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 10 | 04 | 14 |
| Representative of Community Living | 19 | 19 | 38 |
| Representative of Technology | 02 | 03 | 05 |
| Unable to Categorize | 01 | 01 | 02 |
| Total | 514 | 166 | 680 |
Rhode Island ATAP seeks to assist as many individuals as possible. We are committed to reaching as many individuals as we can. We do this through many different ways. One of the ways we are outreaching to the community is through social media. All four of the partners have an excellent social media presence on many different platforms. Many referrals are received this way and it is also a great platform to provide information to the public on issues, new devices, training opportunities, and all things AT related. Another strategy we use to get referrals is through Statewide Collaboration efforts. For example, ATAP has collaborated with Rhode Island's Cyber Senior Program. Cyber Seniors is a program for older adults seeking help with AT. Cyber Seniors has trained volunteers able to assist with any tech help. Additionally, an individual can book a private 45 minute tech session. There has been an increase in referrals from this partnership and we plan on continuing to expand the relationship. ATAP also has a strong relationship with the RI Department of Education (RIDE). ATAP partners work closely with RIDE to make sure all Rhode Island students have access to the best and most useful AT available. We partner with RIDE to provide training to Administrators, teachers, counselors, speech therapists, special educators, and teacher's assistants. Many referrals come from RIDE and the local school departments. Finally, unique to our program is that one of our ATAP partners is the Independent Living Center for the state (OSCIL). This allows for the easy back and fourth for referrals. OSCIL refers individuals to ATAP and we refer individuals to OSCIL. We are lucky to have such a great collaboration with our Independent Living Center in Rhode Island.
Rhode Island's ATAP program receives referrals from all over the state. Rhode Island is unique because we are so small of a state, the ATAP program is very well known. Additionally, because of the size of the state, ATAP can go statewide and attend many different events to promote our mission. We attend events at our local Senior Centers, Libraries, Health Fairs, transition fairs, and various conferences. We have relationships with our local colleges. Through the work ATAP has done with two local colleges, we have created a great relationship which has resulted in a increase in referrals. Also, members from both colleges sit on our Advisory Board. ATAP partners also receive referrals from our Resident service coordinators, the United Way 211, Health Care Providers, and various Community Action Agencies.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
|---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
RI's ATAP in collaboration with RI Office of Rehabilitation Services is working together to ensure all forms, documents, and website material are fully accessible and remediated. We have hired a company to train identified staff on document remediation. The goal is to have every form accessible for all disabilities. This is a long term project that will improve service delivery to all individuals with disabilities who are accessing RI Office of Rehabilitation Services and RI Services for Blind and Visually Impaired .
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
ATAP and ORS have just begun to remediate forms and develop a procedure.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||