Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
| Total Surveyed | 00 | |
| Response rate % | NaN% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 47 |
| C. Total | 47 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 47 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 | $1,317 | $0 | $1,317 |
| Daily Living | 01 | $269 | $0 | $269 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 45 | $19,350 | $0 | $19,350 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 47 | $20,936 | $0 | $20,936 |
Project START's computer refurbishment program continues to be an integral part of education, employment and community living as all individuals with disabilities are eligible. Donated laptops, Chromebooks and PCs are wiped clean, and the latest operating system and virus protection are installed during the refurbishment process. This allows students to complete assignments, clients to gain employment and community members to be involved in a virtual setting that they otherwise would not have the opportunity to do. In addition, after a fall the simple act of taking a bath had become fearful and frustrating for a client. A refurbished and sanitized padded tub transfer bench was donated and was more than a piece of medical equipment to the client. It was safety and dignity, returning a small but vital piece of her independence.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 41 | 00 | 00 | 41 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 00 | 01 | 05 |
| 4. Subtotal | 45 | 00 | 02 | 47 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 45 | 00 | 02 | 47 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 45 | 00 | 02 | 47 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 33 | 70.21% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 14 | 29.79% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 47 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 70 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 02 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 13 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 08 |
| Total | 93 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 50 | 11 | 61 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 09 | 03 | 12 |
| Representative of Education | 09 | 09 | 18 |
| Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 70 | 23 | 93 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 08 | 05 | 13 |
| Hearing | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Speech Communication | 20 | 05 | 25 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 10 | 01 | 11 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 24 | 12 | 36 |
| Daily Living | 13 | 02 | 15 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 09 | 00 | 09 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 85 | 25 | 110 |
A middle school student presented with bilateral hearing loss. He currently uses both a cochlear implant and hearing aids, but he was beginning to prep for academic competitions in both engineering and robotics. He already uses a Roger pen that works in many scenarios, but he is a little embarrassed by the use of this pen. The academic competitions were set to take place as a team competition in a very large open concrete room, and the acoustics were not going to be sufficient to allow the child to hear and understand his teammates to compete. He was loaned an iPad mini with Ava close captioning system. They were able to take the AT device to competition and have a system in place where the child could receive the information from his teammates, and they went on to place in the top five in both Engineering and Robotics!
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 14 | 00 | 48 | 62 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 00 | 00 | 04 |
| Subtotal | 18 | 00 | 48 | 66 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
| Subtotal | 21 | 00 | 48 | 69 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| Total | 22 | 00 | 48 | 70 |
| Performance on this measure | 85.71% | NaN% | 100% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 00 | 03 | 07 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 01 | 07 | 12 |
| 4. Subtotal | 08 | 01 | 11 | 20 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
| 6. Subtotal | 09 | 01 | 12 | 22 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 8. Total | 09 | 01 | 13 | 23 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 88.89% | 100% | 91.67% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 84 | 90.32% |
| Satisfied | 09 | 9.68% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 93 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 08 |
| Hearing | 01 |
| Speech Communication | 101 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 10 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 45 |
| Daily Living | 08 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 70 |
| Computers and Related | 08 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 252 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 193 | 55 | 248 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 58 | 34 | 92 |
| Representatives of Education | 00 | 32 | 32 |
| Representatives of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representative of Community Living | 01 | 22 | 23 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 252 | 143 | 395 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 142 |
| Service Provider | 06 |
| Vendor | 03 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 17 |
| Total | 168 |
The Activator Pro is a brand-new refreshable Braille display that uses active touch technology to create a more natural use of the display. Each pin is equipped with a sensor that allows the device to keep up with were the user is reading. As they user finishes one line of text, the device automatically displays the next line. No more scrolling down to access each line. The Pro is also the very first to offer split screen or multiple simultaneous device use. The user can choose how many of the cells they want to use for each output. The Activator will sense which one they are reading and allow for navigation and input onto that device. Toggling between devices is not required. Cheryl Saucier from Mountain View Low Vision Services brought the very first Activator Pro in the US to TKMC on Thursday for us to see, try and to use for and evaluation. Currently there are two of these devices in the US with a third being shipped. There were a few features we were working through with the individual from the demo. His word for the device is EPIC! It was really surprising to see how well it could move between devices and lines of text. For this individual it will be a huge benefit for him to be able to work at a more efficient rate. As with everything we work with, this is not a device for everyone, but it is a very impressive device. I had no clue we would be able to secure access to the first one in the US. There is a possibility that this was the first evaluation in the US completed with the device. At that time, it had only been in here a few weeks and shown at professional events.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 113 | 46 | 81 | 240 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 06 | 00 | 00 | 06 |
| Subtotal | 119 | 46 | 81 | 246 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 00 | 02 | 05 |
| Subtotal | 122 | 46 | 83 | 251 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Total | 122 | 46 | 84 | 252 |
| Performance on this measure | 97.54% | 100% | 96.43% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 84 | 21.27% |
| Satisfied | 298 | 75.44% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 10 | 2.53% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 03 | 0.76% |
| Total | 395 | |
| Response rate % | 99.24% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 00 | 04 | 08 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 41 | 00 | 01 | 42 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 01 | 08 | 17 |
| 4. Subtotal | 53 | 01 | 13 | 67 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
| 6. Subtotal | 54 | 01 | 14 | 69 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 8. Total | 54 | 01 | 15 | 70 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 83.33% | 0% | 35.71% | 72.46% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 127 | 46 | 129 | 302 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 00 | 00 | 10 |
| Subtotal | 137 | 46 | 129 | 312 |
| Have not made a decision | 06 | 00 | 02 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 143 | 46 | 131 | 320 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
| Total | 144 | 46 | 132 | 322 |
| Performance on this measure | 95.8% | 100% | 97.73% | 97.2% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 95.49% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 99.44% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 153 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
| Representatives of Education | 49 |
| Representatives of Employment | 105 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 26 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 14 |
| Representatives of Technology | 36 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 383 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 152 | 231 | 00 | 383 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 125 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 67 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 141 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 03 |
| Transition | 47 |
| Total | 383 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Assistive Technology staff participated in an environmental control unit training with the founder of ImproveAbility who has been doing consumer ECU for over 10 years. Home automation and creating a system that works for the client were the main topics, and we delved deep into the many options available on the market. We also discussed the best way to evaluate the exact needs of the clients from the most basic of systems to the more in-depth systems. AT and Project START staff feel well equipped to address the needs of Mississippians with disabilities to allow them to live more independently in their homes.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
"Planning with a Purpose- Transition Conference for Families, Educators and Professionals" was hosted on Mississippi State University's campus. T.K. Martin Center's ((Project START subcontractor) director opened the conference and shared MIoD's (MS Institute on Disabilities) mission highlighting services and supports available through its four centers as well as how the Tech Act Grant Program can assist with assistive technology acquisition. A.C.C.E.S.S. (MS's only federally approved Comprehensive Transition Post-Secondary program) spoke on specialized college services for supporting the transition from high school to college with a focus on MSU's inclusive programs for students with autism and intellectual or developmental disabilities. MDRS VR director spoke on how to prepare students with disabilities for employment and independence. Disability Rights of MS shared practical strategies for navigating the transition from high school to adulthood, including goal setting, resources and advocacy tips for families and students. MS Division of Medicaid explained their services and helped families understand eligibility, applications and supports. A special needs planning attorney also shared strategies on benefits eligibility, special needs trusts and planning tools that secure long-term stability for individuals with disabilities.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A Recite Me representative held a Zoom training with Project START and MDRS Office of Communication staff to show the difference between the current accessibility tools used on the MDRS website (Userway) and the formerly used accessibility tools (Recite ME) used on the Project START stand-alone site. After polling some visually impaired advisory council members to look at sites using the different software, it was brought to my attention that the current MDRS tools aren't very user friendly, and this concerned me. It's not very compatible with most screen readers so I wanted to bring in the webhosts of our parent agency to become more informed.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 03 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 03 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
| Education | 70% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 00% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 08% |
| Community Living | 13% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 09% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The program coordinator at TKMC helped a dialysis coordinator find a way for a deaf patient to receive needed feedback regarding alarms on the machines. The use of an Apple watch with a custom sound recognition was discussed in detail.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
A meeting with the disability resource center on the Mississippi State University campus was held to discuss assistive technology available, how to get referrals for evaluations and concerns regarding the technology. Of special note is the discussion regarding how some types of technology that can be used as AT have an AI component that could compromise academic integrity.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Project START exhibited at MSDB (MS Deaf Blind School) for their "College Day" Fair where students with hearing and visual impairments received information from disability organizations that could assist them in their future endeavors. Students in grades 7-12 attended the event. Assistive devices were displayed, and information was dispersed on our services. We had a student ASL interpreter at our booth to ensure we could effectively communicate with the hearing-impaired individuals.
2. Project START hosted its 6th annual AT Conference, Technology Tools for Today: Assistive Technology for Everyone, where presenters shared their experiences with using AT to increase independence in their everyday lives. Many vendors were on site to demo and share information on their products and devices.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 184 | 02 | 186 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 19 | 01 | 20 |
| Representative of Education | 26 | 00 | 26 |
| Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representative of Community Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representative of Technology | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 235 | 03 | 238 |
Program director is part of a SPOTT (Specialized Planning and Options to Transition) team that meets every other week with representatives from Department of Mental Health and other disability advocacy groups that come together to assist Mississippians with disabilities receive services they may need in all aspects of care. Although this is often related to finding placements for individuals in homes or mental health facilities it often brings about referrals to the state AT program for assistive technology needs. We were able to loan DME to an individual who was being transitioned out of a mental health facility to the care of family members.
Referrals are made from representatives on the SPOTT team such as MS State Hospital, Department of Mental Health, Open Doors Homeless Coalition, Department of Child Protective Services, Medicaid, Mental Health Centers, etc.
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 1 |
|---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The Arc of Mississippi, in partnership with Project START at The Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation, continues the effort to keep people receiving services in residential and other programs or who may be in isolated situations, connected with their families and friends.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The Executive Director of the Arc of MS states, "our world of support was forever changed due to the impact of Covid 19 for the people we support. We were unable to personally ride by and check on individuals, due to the dangers of face-to-face interactions. Many of whom lost contact with families and other outside supporters because of the difficulties with quarantining in place, like the government was requiring. Because of our partnership with project START and our “Staying Connected” project, the Arc was able to share connected iPads with regional centers and community partners and some individuals to “stay connected” with their loved ones. To date, we would estimate, several hundred interactions that would not have taken place, have in fact happened because of this partnership. Participants have connected with family, friends and providers of service using these devices. We continue to be proud of this service and in this post-covid era the skills learned are still being used today. One of the participants from Westpoint MS said, “without calling you, I would not have anyone to talk to outside of my house. Thank you, project START, for making this happen for me.” One of the highlights continues to be project "Success", a crisis intervention project of Boswell regional center in Magee MS. Boswell was a recipient of two devices and they continue to use them today for their clients who are in their program for short periods of time- to get their behaviors under control. They are able to stay connected with their families and caregivers back in the programs that they came from. The devices have been used to send pictures and videos throughout their stay, in an effort to stay connected with the program/families that they will be returning to." He also stated, "we, here at The Arc of Mississippi, continue to be proud of our involvement with person’s who experience disability daily and of our continued partnership with project START and their leadership in serving people statewide who have a disability."
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan;
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||