National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Project START
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.mdrs.ms.gov/assistive-technology/project-start (www.mdrs.ms.gov)
Mailing Address:
1281 Highway 51 North
City:
Madison
State:
MS
Zip Code:
39110
Program Email:
jtucker@mdrs.ms.gov
Phone:
601-853-5248
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation Services
Mailing Address:
PO Box 1698
City:
Jackson
State:
MS
Zip Code:
39215
Program URL:
www.mdrs.ms.gov

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Tucker, Jamie
Title:
Director
Phone:
601-853-5248
E-mail:
jtucker@mdrs.ms.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Taylor, Billy
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
601-853-5200
E-mail:
btaylor@mdrs.ms.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Tucker, Jamie
Title:
Project START Director
Phone:
601-853-5248
E-mail:
jtucker@mdrs.ms.gov

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Taylor, Billy
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
601-853-5200
E-mail:
btaylor@mdrs.ms.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 47
C. Total 47

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 47

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 01 $1,317 $0 $1,317
Daily Living 01 $269 $0 $269
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 45 $19,350 $0 $19,350
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 47 $20,936 $0 $20,936

D. Anecdote

Project START's computer refurbishment program continues to be an integral part of education, employment and community living as all individuals with disabilities are eligible. Donated laptops, Chromebooks and PCs are wiped clean, and the latest operating system and virus protection are installed during the refurbishment process. This allows students to complete assignments, clients to gain employment and community members to be involved in a virtual setting that they otherwise would not have the opportunity to do. In addition, after a fall the simple act of taking a bath had become fearful and frustrating for a client. A refurbished and sanitized padded tub transfer bench was donated and was more than a piece of medical equipment to the client. It was safety and dignity, returning a small but vital piece of her independence.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 01 01
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 41 00 00 41
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 04 00 01 05
4. Subtotal 45 00 02 47
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 45 00 02 47
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 45 00 02 47
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 33 70.21%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 14 29.79%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 47
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 70
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 02
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 13
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 08
Total 93

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 50 11 61
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 09 03 12
Representative of Education 09 09 18
Representative of Employment 01 00 01
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 01 00 01
Representatives of Community Living 00 00 00
Representatives of Technology 00 00 00
Total 70 23 93

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 08 05 13
Hearing 01 00 01
Speech Communication 20 05 25
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 10 01 11
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 24 12 36
Daily Living 13 02 15
Environmental Adaptations 00 00 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 09 00 09
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 00 00
Total 85 25 110

E. Anecdote

A middle school student presented with bilateral hearing loss. He currently uses both a cochlear implant and hearing aids, but he was beginning to prep for academic competitions in both engineering and robotics. He already uses a Roger pen that works in many scenarios, but he is a little embarrassed by the use of this pen. The academic competitions were set to take place as a team competition in a very large open concrete room, and the acoustics were not going to be sufficient to allow the child to hear and understand his teammates to compete. He was loaned an iPad mini with Ava close captioning system. They were able to take the AT device to competition and have a system in place where the child could receive the information from his teammates, and they went on to place in the top five in both Engineering and Robotics!

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 14 00 48 62
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 04 00 00 04
Subtotal 18 00 48 66
Have not made a decision 03 00 00 03
Subtotal 21 00 48 69
Nonrespondent 01 00 00 01
Total 22 00 48 70
Performance on this measure 85.71% NaN% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 00 03 07
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 01 01
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 04 01 07 12
4. Subtotal 08 01 11 20
5. None of the above 01 00 01 02
6. Subtotal 09 01 12 22
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
8. Total 09 01 13 23
9. Performance on this measure 88.89% 100% 91.67%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 84 90.32%
Satisfied 09 9.68%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 93
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 08
Hearing 01
Speech Communication 101
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 10
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 45
Daily Living 08
Environmental Adaptations 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 70
Computers and Related 08
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01
Total # of Device Demonstrations 252

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 193 55 248
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 58 34 92
Representatives of Education 00 32 32
Representatives of Employment 00 00 00
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 00 00 00
Representative of Community Living 01 22 23
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Total 252 143 395

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 142
Service Provider 06
Vendor 03
Repair Service 00
Others 17
Total 168

D. Anecdote

The Activator Pro is a brand-new refreshable Braille display that uses active touch technology to create a more natural use of the display. Each pin is equipped with a sensor that allows the device to keep up with were the user is reading. As they user finishes one line of text, the device automatically displays the next line. No more scrolling down to access each line. The Pro is also the very first to offer split screen or multiple simultaneous device use. The user can choose how many of the cells they want to use for each output. The Activator will sense which one they are reading and allow for navigation and input onto that device. Toggling between devices is not required. Cheryl Saucier from Mountain View Low Vision Services brought the very first Activator Pro in the US to TKMC on Thursday for us to see, try and to use for and evaluation. Currently there are two of these devices in the US with a third being shipped. There were a few features we were working through with the individual from the demo. His word for the device is EPIC! It was really surprising to see how well it could move between devices and lines of text. For this individual it will be a huge benefit for him to be able to work at a more efficient rate. As with everything we work with, this is not a device for everyone, but it is a very impressive device. I had no clue we would be able to secure access to the first one in the US. There is a possibility that this was the first evaluation in the US completed with the device. At that time, it had only been in here a few weeks and shown at professional events.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 113 46 81 240
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 06 00 00 06
Subtotal 119 46 81 246
Have not made a decision 03 00 02 05
Subtotal 122 46 83 251
Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
Total 122 46 84 252
Performance on this measure 97.54% 100% 96.43%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 84 21.27%
Satisfied 298 75.44%
Satisfied somewhat 10 2.53%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 03 0.76%
Total 395
Response rate % 99.24%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 00 04 08
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 41 00 01 42
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 08 01 08 17
4. Subtotal 53 01 13 67
5. None of the above 01 00 01 02
6. Subtotal 54 01 14 69
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
8. Total 54 01 15 70
9. Performance on this measure 83.33% 0% 35.71% 72.46%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 127 46 129 302
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 10 00 00 10
Subtotal 137 46 129 312
Have not made a decision 06 00 02 08
Subtotal 143 46 131 320
Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
Total 144 46 132 322
Performance on this measure 95.8% 100% 97.73% 97.2%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 95.49% 95% Met
Response Rate 99.44% 90% Met

Educational/Training Activities

A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Educational/Training Activities by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 153
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 00
Representatives of Education 49
Representatives of Employment 105
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 26
Representatives of Community Living 14
Representatives of Technology 36
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 383

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
152 231 00 383

B. Educational/Training Activity Topics

Educational/Training Activities by Topic
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities Participants
AT Products/Services 125
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 67
Combination of any/all of the above 141
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 03
Transition 47
Total 383

C. Description of Educational/Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Assistive Technology staff participated in an environmental control unit training with the founder of ImproveAbility who has been doing consumer ECU for over 10 years. Home automation and creating a system that works for the client were the main topics, and we delved deep into the many options available on the market. We also discussed the best way to evaluate the exact needs of the clients from the most basic of systems to the more in-depth systems. AT and Project START staff feel well equipped to address the needs of Mississippians with disabilities to allow them to live more independently in their homes.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

"Planning with a Purpose- Transition Conference for Families, Educators and Professionals" was hosted on Mississippi State University's campus. T.K. Martin Center's ((Project START subcontractor) director opened the conference and shared MIoD's (MS Institute on Disabilities) mission highlighting services and supports available through its four centers as well as how the Tech Act Grant Program can assist with assistive technology acquisition. A.C.C.E.S.S. (MS's only federally approved Comprehensive Transition Post-Secondary program) spoke on specialized college services for supporting the transition from high school to college with a focus on MSU's inclusive programs for students with autism and intellectual or developmental disabilities. MDRS VR director spoke on how to prepare students with disabilities for employment and independence. Disability Rights of MS shared practical strategies for navigating the transition from high school to adulthood, including goal setting, resources and advocacy tips for families and students. MS Division of Medicaid explained their services and helped families understand eligibility, applications and supports. A special needs planning attorney also shared strategies on benefits eligibility, special needs trusts and planning tools that secure long-term stability for individuals with disabilities.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

A Recite Me representative held a Zoom training with Project START and MDRS Office of Communication staff to show the difference between the current accessibility tools used on the MDRS website (Userway) and the formerly used accessibility tools (Recite ME) used on the Project START stand-alone site. After polling some visually impaired advisory council members to look at sites using the different software, it was brought to my attention that the current MDRS tools aren't very user friendly, and this concerned me. It's not very compatible with most screen readers so I wanted to bring in the webhosts of our parent agency to become more informed.

D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 03
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 03
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 70%
Employment 00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 08%
Community Living 13%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 09%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The program coordinator at TKMC helped a dialysis coordinator find a way for a deaf patient to receive needed feedback regarding alarms on the machines. The use of an Apple watch with a custom sound recognition was discussed in detail.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

A meeting with the disability resource center on the Mississippi State University campus was held to discuss assistive technology available, how to get referrals for evaluations and concerns regarding the technology. Of special note is the discussion regarding how some types of technology that can be used as AT have an AI component that could compromise academic integrity.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. Project START exhibited at MSDB (MS Deaf Blind School) for their "College Day" Fair where students with hearing and visual impairments received information from disability organizations that could assist them in their future endeavors. Students in grades 7-12 attended the event. Assistive devices were displayed, and information was dispersed on our services. We had a student ASL interpreter at our booth to ensure we could effectively communicate with the hearing-impaired individuals.

2. Project START hosted its 6th annual AT Conference, Technology Tools for Today: Assistive Technology for Everyone, where presenters shared their experiences with using AT to increase independence in their everyday lives. Many vendors were on site to demo and share information on their products and devices.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 184 02 186
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 19 01 20
Representative of Education 26 00 26
Representative of Employment 01 00 01
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 02 00 02
Representative of Community Living 01 00 01
Representative of Technology 02 00 02
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 235 03 238

Referral Types:

Program director is part of a SPOTT (Specialized Planning and Options to Transition) team that meets every other week with representatives from Department of Mental Health and other disability advocacy groups that come together to assist Mississippians with disabilities receive services they may need in all aspects of care. Although this is often related to finding placements for individuals in homes or mental health facilities it often brings about referrals to the state AT program for assistive technology needs. We were able to loan DME to an individual who was being transitioned out of a mental health facility to the care of family members.

Referral Sources:

Referrals are made from representatives on the SPOTT team such as MS State Hospital, Department of Mental Health, Open Doors Homeless Coalition, Department of Child Protective Services, Medicaid, Mental Health Centers, etc.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Yes
No
We are slowly but surely building relationships with SPED directors in schools and districts. Our sub-contractor TKMC has contracts with multiple schools and has been involved with schools all year. They’ve attempted to have regular training geared specifically towards teachers, but the sign up is always low and teachers are prevented from coming due to the availability of substitute teachers. SPED directors are being contacted to see if they could do the trainings on staff development days.

Yes
No
Project START is housed under MS Department of Rehabilitation Services and Vocational Rehabilitation. We've always worked closely with rehabilitation counselors, but there is no official collaboration with VR. We speak at district and regional meetings to keep VR up to date on the latest technology and consistently receive referrals. However, a collaboration hasn’t been formally created to increase the funding for device demonstration, loan, reuse.

Yes
No
While Project START has contacts with the Department of Human Services there is no contractual collaboration in place. Individuals in home and community-based services are informed through various outlets (including Office of Special Disability Programs) regarding AT assistance for different functional limitations. We strive to assist in facilitation of aging in place to help provide independence although no formal collaboration has been established.

No
After a preliminary "information and assistance" type discussion was made in 2024 with staff at the Medicaid office nothing substantial has come to fruition as of now. The Office of Special Disabilities Programs (OSDP) with the Department of Rehabilitation Services works with Medicaid, and referrals frequently come in for AT that is not covered under Medicaid. We continue to support Mississippians with disabilities by “filling in the gap” who are waiting on permanent accommodations.

Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Arc of Mississippi, in partnership with Project START at The Mississippi Department of Rehabilitation, continues the effort to keep people receiving services in residential and other programs or who may be in isolated situations, connected with their families and friends.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The Executive Director of the Arc of MS states, "our world of support was forever changed due to the impact of Covid 19 for the people we support. We were unable to personally ride by and check on individuals, due to the dangers of face-to-face interactions. Many of whom lost contact with families and other outside supporters because of the difficulties with quarantining in place, like the government was requiring. Because of our partnership with project START and our “Staying Connected” project, the Arc was able to share connected iPads with regional centers and community partners and some individuals to “stay connected” with their loved ones. To date, we would estimate, several hundred interactions that would not have taken place, have in fact happened because of this partnership. Participants have connected with family, friends and providers of service using these devices. We continue to be proud of this service and in this post-covid era the skills learned are still being used today. One of the participants from Westpoint MS said, “without calling you, I would not have anyone to talk to outside of my house. Thank you, project START, for making this happen for me.” One of the highlights continues to be project "Success", a crisis intervention project of Boswell regional center in Magee MS. Boswell was a recipient of two devices and they continue to use them today for their clients who are in their program for short periods of time- to get their behaviors under control. They are able to stay connected with their families and caregivers back in the programs that they came from. The devices have been used to send pictures and videos throughout their stay, in an effort to stay connected with the program/families that they will be returning to." He also stated, "we, here at The Arc of Mississippi, continue to be proud of our involvement with person’s who experience disability daily and of our continued partnership with project START and their leadership in serving people statewide who have a disability."

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Community Participation and Integration; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY24 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.