Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 32 | 00 | 32 |
| Approved Not made | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Rejected | 15 | 00 | 15 |
| Total | 51 | 00 | 51 |
| Lowest Income: | $3,999 | Highest Income: | $289,647 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $2,422,024 | 32 | $75,688 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 05 | 05 | 04 | 04 | 02 | 12 | 32 |
| Percentage of Loans | 15.62% | 15.62% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 6.25% | 37.5% | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 19 | 59.38% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 11 | 34.38% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 02 | 6.25% |
| Total | 32 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 19 | $58,916 |
| Partnership Loans | 13 | $479,809 |
| Total | 32 | $538,725 |
| Lowest | 0% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 5% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 62 | 32 | 1.9375% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 19 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 13 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 32 |
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 13 | $42,078 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $80,849 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 13 | $411,984 |
| Computers and related | 02 | $3,814 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 32 | $538,725 |
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
Single Father With Paralysis Needing a Modified Vehicle A 50-year-old single father paralyzed from the waist down needed a fully modified vehicle so he could return to work, care for his son, and re-engage in his community. A state agency referred him to AFP for financing after he identified the vehicle he needed. AFP staff helped him apply for a low-interest loan, which removed the financial barrier to accessing costly vehicle modifications. The modification process took many months to complete, leaving him without reliable transportation during that time. Once the vehicle was finally ready, AFP assisted him in securing the loan needed to move forward. With the modified van, he can now run both of his small businesses, transport his son to school and medical appointments, and reconnect with family life. As he shared, “This equipment will give me the freedom to operate both of my businesses to their fullest potential. As a single dad I will have the ability to drive my son to school or the doctor’s. I can make it to my grandchild’s ball game. I can have a huge part of my life back.”
Child With Congenital Disorder Needing Safe Transportation An 8-year-old girl with congenital disorders of glycosylation is non-verbal, cannot stand independently, and uses a wheelchair. As she grew, her parents struggled to transfer her safely into their car. AFP staff assisted the family in obtaining a financial loan to purchase a modified van, addressing their financial and physical barriers to safe transport. Now they can roll her into the van without lifting, making medical visits, school activities, and daily travel safer and less stressful, greatly improving the family’s quality of life. ________________________________________
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 03 | 21 | 24 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 01 | 03 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 05 | 24 | 29 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 05 | 24 | 29 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 06 | 26 | 32 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 83.33% | 92.31% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 26 | 81.25% |
| Satisfied | 03 | 9.38% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 03 | 9.38% |
| Total Surveyed | 32 | |
| Response rate % | 90.63% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 35 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,248 |
| C. Total | 2,283 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,283 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 05 | $160 | $0 | $160 |
| Daily Living | 30 | $2,325 | $0 | $2,325 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 35 | $2,485 | $0 | $2,485 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 05 | $6,173 | $0 | $6,173 |
| Hearing | 03 | $454 | $0 | $454 |
| Speech Communication | 04 | $1,035 | $0 | $1,035 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 05 | $240 | $0 | $240 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 729 | $1,317,028 | $0 | $1,317,028 |
| Daily Living | 1,590 | $1,973,127 | $53 | $1,973,074 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 08 | $2,645 | $0 | $2,645 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 41 | $12,305 | $0 | $12,305 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | $250 | $0 | $250 |
| Total | 2,387 | $3,313,257 | $53 | $3,313,204 |
A mother requested a pediatric walker for her two-year-old daughter, “Sarah,” who needed to begin walking practice to be ready for preschool. Insurance delays would have taken months, limiting her developmental progress. Following a referral from Early Intervention, REquipment provided a refurbished Kaye W1-2BR walker within a week. With daily practice, Sarah quickly gained mobility and confidence. By fall, she entered preschool able to explore her classroom and participate fully with peers. The device improved her physical development, independence, and access to early education.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 13 | 2,244 | 2,260 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 06 | 07 |
| 4. Subtotal | 03 | 14 | 2,259 | 2,276 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 07 | 07 |
| 6. Subtotal | 03 | 14 | 2,266 | 2,283 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 03 | 14 | 2,266 | 2,283 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.69% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 2,147 | 94.04% |
| Satisfied | 135 | 5.91% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.04% |
| Total Surveyed | 2,283 | |
| Response rate % | 99.96% |
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 269 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 36 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 45 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 80 |
| Total | 430 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 42 | 41 | 83 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 62 | 32 | 94 |
| Representative of Education | 52 | 07 | 59 |
| Representative of Employment | 01 | 04 | 05 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 40 | 09 | 49 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 21 | 19 | 40 |
| Representatives of Technology | 51 | 49 | 100 |
| Total | 269 | 161 | 430 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 35 | 70 | 105 |
| Hearing | 23 | 21 | 44 |
| Speech Communication | 49 | 26 | 75 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 53 | 46 | 99 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 10 | 12 | 22 |
| Daily Living | 87 | 95 | 182 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 31 | 48 | 79 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 130 | 100 | 230 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | 15 | 19 |
| Total | 422 | 433 | 855 |
Portable Ramps Reconnect Old Friends A local resident wanted to host a long-time friend who uses a wheelchair, but his home had several entry steps and a raised back porch. He needed portable ramps, yet commercial rentals required long contracts he couldn’t afford for a single weekend. He contacted ATRC Pittsfield, and staff reviewed his home layout and arranged a short-term loan of three portable ramps from the device inventory. They also provided guidance on safe setup and use. With the ramps installed, his friend was able to enter the home and spend the weekend with the family—something that hadn’t been possible in more than ten years. The device loan eliminated financial and physical barriers and restored meaningful social connection. By improving access to his home, the ramps supported full participation in community and family life and strengthened an important long-term relationship.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 99 | 10 | 78 | 187 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 30 | 05 | 25 | 60 |
| Subtotal | 129 | 15 | 103 | 247 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 01 | 04 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 132 | 16 | 107 | 255 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
| Total | 133 | 16 | 120 | 269 |
| Performance on this measure | 97.73% | 93.75% | 96.26% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 25 | 07 | 39 | 71 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 10 | 07 | 45 | 62 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
| 4. Subtotal | 35 | 14 | 89 | 138 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 05 | 06 |
| 6. Subtotal | 35 | 15 | 94 | 144 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 02 | 13 | 17 |
| 8. Total | 37 | 17 | 107 | 161 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 93.33% | 94.68% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 348 | 80.93% |
| Satisfied | 40 | 9.3% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 14 | 3.26% |
| Not at all satisfied | 04 | 0.93% |
| Nonrespondent | 24 | 5.58% |
| Total Surveyed | 430 | |
| Response rate % | 94.42% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 31 |
| Hearing | 17 |
| Speech Communication | 16 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 18 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 |
| Daily Living | 23 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 11 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 45 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 20 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 189 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 66 | 19 | 85 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 28 | 43 | 71 |
| Representatives of Education | 39 | 15 | 54 |
| Representatives of Employment | 08 | 10 | 18 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 19 | 57 | 76 |
| Representative of Community Living | 16 | 19 | 35 |
| Representative of Technology | 13 | 01 | 14 |
| Total | 189 | 164 | 353 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 46 |
| Service Provider | 18 |
| Vendor | 68 |
| Repair Service | 01 |
| Others | 04 |
| Total | 137 |
On 1/10/25, ATRC Worcester hosted an on-site demonstration session for a group of six high school seniors with disabilities who wanted to learn about assistive technology that could support them after graduation. ATRC staff demonstrated and also compared and contrasted the features of communication aids, note-taking tools, organizational apps, and mobility-related supports. Students often face barriers such as limited exposure to AT, confusion about what devices they can access after leaving K–12 services, and uncertainty about how AT fits into college, employment, or independent living. ATRC staff also explained loan program procedures, shared resources, and helped the students identify tools that aligned with their future plans. The visit improved the students’ understanding of available supports and increased their readiness for adult life. With clearer expectations and knowledge of AT resources, they are more likely to access accommodations in higher education, perform job tasks more independently, and participate fully in community settings.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 49 | 20 | 71 | 140 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 07 | 06 | 19 | 32 |
| Subtotal | 56 | 26 | 90 | 172 |
| Have not made a decision | 06 | 03 | 08 | 17 |
| Subtotal | 62 | 29 | 98 | 189 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 62 | 29 | 98 | 189 |
| Performance on this measure | 90.32% | 89.66% | 91.84% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 261 | 73.94% |
| Satisfied | 79 | 22.38% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 13 | 3.68% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 353 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 28 | 23 | 2,304 | 2,355 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 10 | 09 | 55 | 74 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 13 | 14 |
| 4. Subtotal | 38 | 33 | 2,372 | 2,443 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 12 | 13 |
| 6. Subtotal | 38 | 34 | 2,384 | 2,456 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 03 | 15 | 20 |
| 8. Total | 40 | 37 | 2,399 | 2,476 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 91.43% | 98.87% | 98.78% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 148 | 30 | 149 | 327 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 37 | 11 | 44 | 92 |
| Subtotal | 185 | 41 | 193 | 419 |
| Have not made a decision | 09 | 04 | 12 | 25 |
| Subtotal | 194 | 45 | 205 | 444 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
| Total | 195 | 45 | 218 | 458 |
| Performance on this measure | 95.36% | 91.11% | 94.15% | 94.37% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 98.99% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 99.10% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 172 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 38 |
| Representatives of Education | 215 |
| Representatives of Employment | 36 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 64 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 68 |
| Representatives of Technology | 40 |
| Unable to Categorize | 55 |
| TOTAL | 688 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 688 | 00 | 00 | 688 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 194 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 313 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 181 |
| Transition | 00 |
| Total | 688 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Building AT Awareness among Future Rehabilitation Professionals Throughout the year, ATRC Pittsfield provided technical assistance to American International College (AIC) to help integrate assistive technology concepts into the school’s rehabilitation sciences curriculum. Faculty recognized a need to better prepare students for real-world applications of AT in therapy and rehabilitation contexts—a gap that ATRC’s expertise could fill. ATRC Pittsfield staff collaborated with instructors to design and deliver multiple guest lectures, hands-on demonstrations, and study sessions focused on identifying appropriate AT solutions for different disability categories. Topics included the role of AT in functional independence, device selection and funding sources, and case studies illustrating how technology supports employment and community living outcomes. Students participated in live device demonstrations and had opportunities to practice identifying AT solutions for hypothetical clients. Over the course of the year, feedback indicated that students developed greater confidence in discussing and recommending assistive technology as part of their professional practice. Impact: This partnership addressed a critical knowledge barrier within rehabilitation education and built capacity among emerging professionals who will serve people with disabilities throughout Massachusetts. By supporting AIC’s curriculum development, ATRC Pittsfield contributed to a stronger, more informed workforce—one that will promote employment access and community integration through AT awareness and application.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Accessible PDFs: Expanding Digital Access Through Hands-On Training During the period under review, the State AT Act Program funded a six-session webinar series on ICT accessibility covering a wide range of topics. One of the most popular and best-attended sessions focused on creating Accessible PDFs, a need consistently identified by educators, service providers, and community organizations across Massachusetts. Many consumers who use screen readers, magnifiers, or cognitive accessibility tools continue to face barriers when PDFs are untagged, poorly structured, or incompatible with assistive technology. At the same time, professionals report that they want to make their documents accessible but lack practical, step-by-step instruction. To address this need, the Assistive Technology Regional Center (ATRC) operated by Easterseals MA, in partnership with the Carroll Center for the Blind, delivered an interactive webinar on how to create accessible PDFs. Expert presenters demonstrated essential techniques—tagging structure, setting reading order, using headings, adding alt text, and formatting tables and forms—while also showing in real time how inaccessible PDFs behave with commonly used assistive technologies. The Statewide AT Program and its ATRC helped remove several recurring barriers: limited access to accessibility training, confusion about compliance requirements, and the cost of professional instruction. By offering this session free of charge and grounded in current WCAG, ADA, and Section 508 standards, the program ensured that staff from schools, nonprofits, and local governments could build the skills they need to produce accessible digital documents. Participants reported that the training gave them the knowledge and confidence to make their materials usable by people with disabilities. As a result, it increased the likelihood that students, employees, and community members who rely on assistive technology will receive documents they can read, navigate, and complete independently. This Accessible PDFs session illustrates how the Statewide AT Program strengthens digital inclusion by providing targeted training, addressing barriers, and equipping organizations with practical skills that directly improve access for individuals with disabilities across the Commonwealth.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 21 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 30 |
| No known outcome at this time | 46 |
| Nonrespondent | 84 |
| Total | 181 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 28.2% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Not Met |
During FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program did not meet the ACL performance standard for the IT/Telecommunications Educational and Training Activities measure. A total of 181 individuals registered for and participated in ICT trainings; however, 84 participants did not complete the required post-event survey. As a result, and based on the ACL-defined calculation methodology, the Program achieved a performance measure percentage of 28.2 percent, which falls below the ACL target of 70 percent. Overall participation in educational activities during FY25 declined modestly compared to the prior fiscal year. This reduction is attributable, in part, to the absence of a large-scale statewide event such as the Assistive Technology Training and Expo that was held in FY24. In addition, survey response rates for IT and telecommunications trainings declined significantly. While follow-up efforts were made to solicit post-training feedback from participants, these efforts did not yield s
| Education | 72% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 09% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 09% |
| Community Living | 10% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
A large disability-employment nonprofit requested technical assistance to improve staff competency in selecting and using AT that supports job seekers with disabilities. ATRC Boston staff met several times with the organization’s supportive technology team, demonstrating devices such as text-to-speech tools, ergonomic equipment, magnification apps, and communication supports. The nonprofit faced barriers including inconsistent AT knowledge among staff and uncertainty about which tools best match diverse employment needs. ATRC staff helped evaluate device options and identify practical tools for common workplace tasks. This assistance strengthened the organization’s ability to support workers with disabilities, leading to improved job readiness, accommodation planning, and sustained employment outcomes.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
A Council on Aging director sought help developing an ongoing assistive technology education program for older adults. ATRC Worcester staff explained key AT categories—communication, home safety, medication management, mobility supports—and walked through loan procedures and evaluation resources. The COA faced barriers including limited AT knowledge and uncertainty about how to maintain an updated information program for its members. ATRC staff provided technical guidance, resource lists, and strategies for staying informed about emerging AT. This support helped the COA build a sustainable community program that expands older adults’ access to devices that support independence, safety, and participation in community living.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. At the regional 55+ Health and Wellness Fair, ATRC Worcester conducted a high-impact public awareness activity that reached 200 older adults and caregivers seeking assistive technology to support safe, independent aging. Many attendees needed tools such as utensil grips for arthritis, medication management systems, and digital magnifiers for low vision but lacked information about available options or assumed AT would be costly or difficult to obtain. ATRC Worcester staff addressed these barriers by providing hands-on demonstrations and explaining how each device can support daily routines, home safety, and continued participation in community life. Staff also described how consumers can borrow devices, schedule demonstrations, and receive training through the State AT Act Program operated by Easterseals MA. By offering clear guidance and emphasizing low- and no-cost access points, ATRC Worcester helped participants overcome both knowledge and financial barriers. As a result, attendees left with greater confidence in identifying appropriate AT and connecting themselves or loved ones to tools that promote independence and sustained engagement in their homes and communities.
2. ATRC Pittsfield, operated by UCP of Western MA, implemented a coordinated public awareness initiative in partnership with Hearthway Berkshire Housing, reaching 300 low-income residents—including older adults and individuals with disabilities—who needed assistive technology to address mobility, communication, sensory, and daily-living challenges. Many residents were unfamiliar with AT or believed it was unaffordable, creating both informational and economic barriers to independence. ATRC Pittsfield staff worked closely with Hearthway residential managers to conduct on-site presentations across Berkshire County, demonstrating adaptive utensils, mobility and transfer supports, low-cost communication devices, and environmental aids that could immediately assist with daily tasks. Staff also shared accessible materials outlining the AT Act Program’s device loan, reuse, and training services. This collaboration strengthened referral pathways and increased Hearthway staff capacity to connect residents to AT resources. As awareness grew, more residents requested device loans and demonstrations, resulting in improved independence, safer home environments, and greater participation in community life throughout western Massachusetts.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 111 | 44 | 155 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 70 | 25 | 95 |
| Representative of Education | 69 | 05 | 74 |
| Representative of Employment | 03 | 00 | 03 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 35 | 06 | 41 |
| Representative of Community Living | 46 | 13 | 59 |
| Representative of Technology | 10 | 01 | 11 |
| Unable to Categorize | 03 | 02 | 05 |
| Total | 347 | 96 | 443 |
Unlike FY24, during FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program did not undertake additional activities using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding, and no Assistive Technology Training and Expo was held during the fiscal year. As a result, referral levels did not experience the same growth associated with one-time ARPA-funded initiatives in prior years. Nevertheless, several ongoing initiatives continued to support awareness of and engagement with the State AT Act Program. In particular, the rebranding and continued operation of the AT-DME Reuse Program remained an important source of referrals. In addition, the Assistive Technology Regional Centers (ATRCs) continued to carry out extensive Information and Assistance activities across the Commonwealth. Through direct engagement with individuals, families, service providers, and partner organizations, the ATRCs provided guidance on assistive technology options, program eligibility, and pathways to services, further strengthening connections to the State AT Act Program. The enhanced visibility of the reuse program, coupled with its broader range of assistive technology devices and the ongoing Information and Assistance activities of the ATRCs, continued to connect individuals with the State AT Act Program and its services. In addition, MassAbility supported outreach efforts by featuring information about the State AT Act Program in its regular publication, Commissioner’s Communications, and other communication channels. These internal and external vehicles helped reinforce awareness of the program among partner agencies, providers, and stakeholders across the Commonwealth. Overall, while no new large-scale outreach initiatives were launched in FY25, the combination of sustained AT-DME reuse activities, ongoing Information and Assistance services delivered by the ATRCs, and continued communications through MassAbility helped maintain steady referral activity. Referral types and sources remained largely consistent with prior years. --- Rebranding and Continued Operation of the State Reuse Program The rebranding and centralization of the State Reuse Program, implemented in earlier fiscal years, continued to yield benefits in FY25. By incorporating a wider range of assistive technology devices alongside durable medical equipment, the program remained well positioned to meet the needs of individuals seeking affordable AT solutions. The ATRCs played a key role in supporting the reuse program by providing Information and Assistance to individuals exploring reuse options, facilitating referrals, and helping consumers navigate available AT resources. Although no new statewide awareness campaign was launched during FY25, prior outreach efforts, established partnerships, and ongoing ATRC engagement continued to generate referrals. Healthcare providers, educators, rehabilitation counselors, and community-based organizations remained familiar with the reuse program and its connection to the State AT Act Program, contributing to a steady flow of referrals.
In FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program continued to receive referrals from a broad and diverse range of sources, reflecting statewide reach and strong, sustained partnerships. Many of these referrals were supported by the ongoing Information and Assistance activities of the ATRCs, which served as trusted regional points of contact for assistive technology information and services. Sister State Agencies Referrals continued to be received from sister state agencies, including the Massachusetts Office on Disability, the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind, the Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and the Department of Developmental Services. These agencies collectively remained a significant source of referrals and ensured statewide access for individuals with a wide range of disabilities. Non-State Organizations Non-state organizations continued to play an important role in referring individuals to the program. Advocacy organizations, Independent Living Centers, senior centers, and Area Agencies on Aging remained consistent referral sources, representing urban, suburban, and rural communities across the Commonwealth. Healthcare and Individual Practitioners Hospitals, healthcare institutions, and individual healthcare practitioners continued to refer individuals to the program in FY25. These referrals reflected both metropolitan and smaller community-based healthcare settings, helping to maintain statewide coverage. Educators, Case Workers, and Rehabilitation Counselors Educators, case workers, and rehabilitation counselors also continued to refer individuals with disabilities to the State AT Act Program. Their referrals supported access to assistive technology in educational, vocational, and rehabilitation contexts throughout the state.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Appropriations | $1,343,807 | Reuse | True |
| State Appropriations | $1,067,484 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Amount: $2,411,291 |
During FY25, leveraged funding supported AT-DME Reuse activities only. All reuse-related activities supported by leveraged funding were reported in the Reuse section of the APR.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
No unique data issues to report.