National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Massachusetts State AT Act Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massability-assistive-technology-services
Mailing Address:
40 Broad Street, 9th Floor
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02109
Program Email:
Phone:
617-204-3826
TTY:
617-204-3815

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
MassAbility
Mailing Address:
40 Broad Street, 9th Floor
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02109
Program URL:
https://www.mass.gov/info-details/massability-assistive-technology-services

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@mass.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@mass.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Wolf, Toni
Title:
Commissioner
Phone:
617-204-3600
E-mail:
toni.wolf@mass.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 32 00 32
Approved Not made 04 00 04
Rejected 15 00 15
Total 51 00 51

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $3,999 Highest Income: $289,647

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$2,422,024 32 $75,688

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 05 05 04 04 02 12 32
Percentage of Loans 15.62% 15.62% 12.5% 12.5% 6.25% 37.5% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 19 59.38%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 11 34.38%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 02 6.25%
Total 32 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 19 $58,916
Partnership Loans 13 $479,809
Total 32 $538,725

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 0%
Highest 5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
62 32 1.9375%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 19
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 13
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 32

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 13 $42,078
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 04 $80,849
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 13 $411,984
Computers and related 02 $3,814
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 32 $538,725

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 00
Net loss for loans in default $0

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Single Father With Paralysis Needing a Modified Vehicle A 50-year-old single father paralyzed from the waist down needed a fully modified vehicle so he could return to work, care for his son, and re-engage in his community. A state agency referred him to AFP for financing after he identified the vehicle he needed. AFP staff helped him apply for a low-interest loan, which removed the financial barrier to accessing costly vehicle modifications. The modification process took many months to complete, leaving him without reliable transportation during that time. Once the vehicle was finally ready, AFP assisted him in securing the loan needed to move forward. With the modified van, he can now run both of his small businesses, transport his son to school and medical appointments, and reconnect with family life. As he shared, “This equipment will give me the freedom to operate both of my businesses to their fullest potential. As a single dad I will have the ability to drive my son to school or the doctor’s. I can make it to my grandchild’s ball game. I can have a huge part of my life back.”

Impact Area

Child With Congenital Disorder Needing Safe Transportation An 8-year-old girl with congenital disorders of glycosylation is non-verbal, cannot stand independently, and uses a wheelchair. As she grew, her parents struggled to transfer her safely into their car. AFP staff assisted the family in obtaining a financial loan to purchase a modified van, addressing their financial and physical barriers to safe transport. Now they can roll her into the van without lifting, making medical visits, school activities, and daily travel safer and less stressful, greatly improving the family’s quality of life. ________________________________________

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 03 21 24
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 02 01 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 00 05 24 29
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 05 24 29
7. Nonrespondent 00 01 02 03
8. Total 00 06 26 32
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 83.33% 92.31%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 26 81.25%
Satisfied 03 9.38%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 03 9.38%
Total Surveyed 32
Response rate % 90.63%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 35
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 2,248
C. Total 2,283

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 2,283

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 05 $160 $0 $160
Daily Living 30 $2,325 $0 $2,325
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 35 $2,485 $0 $2,485

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 05 $6,173 $0 $6,173
Hearing 03 $454 $0 $454
Speech Communication 04 $1,035 $0 $1,035
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 05 $240 $0 $240
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 729 $1,317,028 $0 $1,317,028
Daily Living 1,590 $1,973,127 $53 $1,973,074
Environmental Adaptations 08 $2,645 $0 $2,645
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 41 $12,305 $0 $12,305
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02 $250 $0 $250
Total 2,387 $3,313,257 $53 $3,313,204

D. Anecdote

A mother requested a pediatric walker for her two-year-old daughter, “Sarah,” who needed to begin walking practice to be ready for preschool. Insurance delays would have taken months, limiting her developmental progress. Following a referral from Early Intervention, REquipment provided a refurbished Kaye W1-2BR walker within a week. With daily practice, Sarah quickly gained mobility and confidence. By fall, she entered preschool able to explore her classroom and participate fully with peers. The device improved her physical development, independence, and access to early education.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 03 13 2,244 2,260
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 09 09
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 06 07
4. Subtotal 03 14 2,259 2,276
5. None of the above 00 00 07 07
6. Subtotal 03 14 2,266 2,283
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 03 14 2,266 2,283
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.69%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 2,147 94.04%
Satisfied 135 5.91%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 01 0.04%
Total Surveyed 2,283
Response rate % 99.96%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 269
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 36
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 45
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 80
Total 430

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 42 41 83
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 62 32 94
Representative of Education 52 07 59
Representative of Employment 01 04 05
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 40 09 49
Representatives of Community Living 21 19 40
Representatives of Technology 51 49 100
Total 269 161 430

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 35 70 105
Hearing 23 21 44
Speech Communication 49 26 75
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 53 46 99
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 10 12 22
Daily Living 87 95 182
Environmental Adaptations 31 48 79
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 130 100 230
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 04 15 19
Total 422 433 855

E. Anecdote

Portable Ramps Reconnect Old Friends A local resident wanted to host a long-time friend who uses a wheelchair, but his home had several entry steps and a raised back porch. He needed portable ramps, yet commercial rentals required long contracts he couldn’t afford for a single weekend. He contacted ATRC Pittsfield, and staff reviewed his home layout and arranged a short-term loan of three portable ramps from the device inventory. They also provided guidance on safe setup and use. With the ramps installed, his friend was able to enter the home and spend the weekend with the family—something that hadn’t been possible in more than ten years. The device loan eliminated financial and physical barriers and restored meaningful social connection. By improving access to his home, the ramps supported full participation in community and family life and strengthened an important long-term relationship.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 99 10 78 187
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 30 05 25 60
Subtotal 129 15 103 247
Have not made a decision 03 01 04 08
Subtotal 132 16 107 255
Nonrespondent 01 00 13 14
Total 133 16 120 269
Performance on this measure 97.73% 93.75% 96.26%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 25 07 39 71
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 10 07 45 62
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 05 05
4. Subtotal 35 14 89 138
5. None of the above 00 01 05 06
6. Subtotal 35 15 94 144
7. Nonrespondent 02 02 13 17
8. Total 37 17 107 161
9. Performance on this measure 100% 93.33% 94.68%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 348 80.93%
Satisfied 40 9.3%
Satisfied somewhat 14 3.26%
Not at all satisfied 04 0.93%
Nonrespondent 24 5.58%
Total Surveyed 430
Response rate % 94.42%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 31
Hearing 17
Speech Communication 16
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 18
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 08
Daily Living 23
Environmental Adaptations 11
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 45
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 20
Total # of Device Demonstrations 189

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 66 19 85
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 28 43 71
Representatives of Education 39 15 54
Representatives of Employment 08 10 18
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 19 57 76
Representative of Community Living 16 19 35
Representative of Technology 13 01 14
Total 189 164 353

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 46
Service Provider 18
Vendor 68
Repair Service 01
Others 04
Total 137

D. Anecdote

On 1/10/25, ATRC Worcester hosted an on-site demonstration session for a group of six high school seniors with disabilities who wanted to learn about assistive technology that could support them after graduation. ATRC staff demonstrated and also compared and contrasted the features of communication aids, note-taking tools, organizational apps, and mobility-related supports. Students often face barriers such as limited exposure to AT, confusion about what devices they can access after leaving K–12 services, and uncertainty about how AT fits into college, employment, or independent living. ATRC staff also explained loan program procedures, shared resources, and helped the students identify tools that aligned with their future plans. The visit improved the students’ understanding of available supports and increased their readiness for adult life. With clearer expectations and knowledge of AT resources, they are more likely to access accommodations in higher education, perform job tasks more independently, and participate fully in community settings.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 49 20 71 140
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 07 06 19 32
Subtotal 56 26 90 172
Have not made a decision 06 03 08 17
Subtotal 62 29 98 189
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 62 29 98 189
Performance on this measure 90.32% 89.66% 91.84%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 261 73.94%
Satisfied 79 22.38%
Satisfied somewhat 13 3.68%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 353
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 28 23 2,304 2,355
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 10 09 55 74
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 13 14
4. Subtotal 38 33 2,372 2,443
5. None of the above 00 01 12 13
6. Subtotal 38 34 2,384 2,456
7. Nonrespondent 02 03 15 20
8. Total 40 37 2,399 2,476
9. Performance on this measure 100% 91.43% 98.87% 98.78%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 148 30 149 327
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 37 11 44 92
Subtotal 185 41 193 419
Have not made a decision 09 04 12 25
Subtotal 194 45 205 444
Nonrespondent 01 00 13 14
Total 195 45 218 458
Performance on this measure 95.36% 91.11% 94.15% 94.37%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 98.99% 95% Met
Response Rate 99.10% 90% Met

Educational/Training Activities

A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Educational/Training Activities by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 172
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 38
Representatives of Education 215
Representatives of Employment 36
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 64
Representatives of Community Living 68
Representatives of Technology 40
Unable to Categorize 55
TOTAL 688

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
688 00 00 688

B. Educational/Training Activity Topics

Educational/Training Activities by Topic
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities Participants
AT Products/Services 194
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 313
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 181
Transition 00
Total 688

C. Description of Educational/Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Building AT Awareness among Future Rehabilitation Professionals Throughout the year, ATRC Pittsfield provided technical assistance to American International College (AIC) to help integrate assistive technology concepts into the school’s rehabilitation sciences curriculum. Faculty recognized a need to better prepare students for real-world applications of AT in therapy and rehabilitation contexts—a gap that ATRC’s expertise could fill. ATRC Pittsfield staff collaborated with instructors to design and deliver multiple guest lectures, hands-on demonstrations, and study sessions focused on identifying appropriate AT solutions for different disability categories. Topics included the role of AT in functional independence, device selection and funding sources, and case studies illustrating how technology supports employment and community living outcomes. Students participated in live device demonstrations and had opportunities to practice identifying AT solutions for hypothetical clients. Over the course of the year, feedback indicated that students developed greater confidence in discussing and recommending assistive technology as part of their professional practice. Impact: This partnership addressed a critical knowledge barrier within rehabilitation education and built capacity among emerging professionals who will serve people with disabilities throughout Massachusetts. By supporting AIC’s curriculum development, ATRC Pittsfield contributed to a stronger, more informed workforce—one that will promote employment access and community integration through AT awareness and application.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Accessible PDFs: Expanding Digital Access Through Hands-On Training During the period under review, the State AT Act Program funded a six-session webinar series on ICT accessibility covering a wide range of topics. One of the most popular and best-attended sessions focused on creating Accessible PDFs, a need consistently identified by educators, service providers, and community organizations across Massachusetts. Many consumers who use screen readers, magnifiers, or cognitive accessibility tools continue to face barriers when PDFs are untagged, poorly structured, or incompatible with assistive technology. At the same time, professionals report that they want to make their documents accessible but lack practical, step-by-step instruction. To address this need, the Assistive Technology Regional Center (ATRC) operated by Easterseals MA, in partnership with the Carroll Center for the Blind, delivered an interactive webinar on how to create accessible PDFs. Expert presenters demonstrated essential techniques—tagging structure, setting reading order, using headings, adding alt text, and formatting tables and forms—while also showing in real time how inaccessible PDFs behave with commonly used assistive technologies. The Statewide AT Program and its ATRC helped remove several recurring barriers: limited access to accessibility training, confusion about compliance requirements, and the cost of professional instruction. By offering this session free of charge and grounded in current WCAG, ADA, and Section 508 standards, the program ensured that staff from schools, nonprofits, and local governments could build the skills they need to produce accessible digital documents. Participants reported that the training gave them the knowledge and confidence to make their materials usable by people with disabilities. As a result, it increased the likelihood that students, employees, and community members who rely on assistive technology will receive documents they can read, navigate, and complete independently. This Accessible PDFs session illustrates how the Statewide AT Program strengthens digital inclusion by providing targeted training, addressing barriers, and equipping organizations with practical skills that directly improve access for individuals with disabilities across the Commonwealth.

D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 21
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 30
No known outcome at this time 46
Nonrespondent 84
Total 181
Performance Measure Percentage 28.2%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

During FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program did not meet the ACL performance standard for the IT/Telecommunications Educational and Training Activities measure. A total of 181 individuals registered for and participated in ICT trainings; however, 84 participants did not complete the required post-event survey. As a result, and based on the ACL-defined calculation methodology, the Program achieved a performance measure percentage of 28.2 percent, which falls below the ACL target of 70 percent. Overall participation in educational activities during FY25 declined modestly compared to the prior fiscal year. This reduction is attributable, in part, to the absence of a large-scale statewide event such as the Assistive Technology Training and Expo that was held in FY24. In addition, survey response rates for IT and telecommunications trainings declined significantly. While follow-up efforts were made to solicit post-training feedback from participants, these efforts did not yield s

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 72%
Employment 09%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 09%
Community Living 10%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

A large disability-employment nonprofit requested technical assistance to improve staff competency in selecting and using AT that supports job seekers with disabilities. ATRC Boston staff met several times with the organization’s supportive technology team, demonstrating devices such as text-to-speech tools, ergonomic equipment, magnification apps, and communication supports. The nonprofit faced barriers including inconsistent AT knowledge among staff and uncertainty about which tools best match diverse employment needs. ATRC staff helped evaluate device options and identify practical tools for common workplace tasks. This assistance strengthened the organization’s ability to support workers with disabilities, leading to improved job readiness, accommodation planning, and sustained employment outcomes.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

A Council on Aging director sought help developing an ongoing assistive technology education program for older adults. ATRC Worcester staff explained key AT categories—communication, home safety, medication management, mobility supports—and walked through loan procedures and evaluation resources. The COA faced barriers including limited AT knowledge and uncertainty about how to maintain an updated information program for its members. ATRC staff provided technical guidance, resource lists, and strategies for staying informed about emerging AT. This support helped the COA build a sustainable community program that expands older adults’ access to devices that support independence, safety, and participation in community living.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. At the regional 55+ Health and Wellness Fair, ATRC Worcester conducted a high-impact public awareness activity that reached 200 older adults and caregivers seeking assistive technology to support safe, independent aging. Many attendees needed tools such as utensil grips for arthritis, medication management systems, and digital magnifiers for low vision but lacked information about available options or assumed AT would be costly or difficult to obtain. ATRC Worcester staff addressed these barriers by providing hands-on demonstrations and explaining how each device can support daily routines, home safety, and continued participation in community life. Staff also described how consumers can borrow devices, schedule demonstrations, and receive training through the State AT Act Program operated by Easterseals MA. By offering clear guidance and emphasizing low- and no-cost access points, ATRC Worcester helped participants overcome both knowledge and financial barriers. As a result, attendees left with greater confidence in identifying appropriate AT and connecting themselves or loved ones to tools that promote independence and sustained engagement in their homes and communities.

2. ATRC Pittsfield, operated by UCP of Western MA, implemented a coordinated public awareness initiative in partnership with Hearthway Berkshire Housing, reaching 300 low-income residents—including older adults and individuals with disabilities—who needed assistive technology to address mobility, communication, sensory, and daily-living challenges. Many residents were unfamiliar with AT or believed it was unaffordable, creating both informational and economic barriers to independence. ATRC Pittsfield staff worked closely with Hearthway residential managers to conduct on-site presentations across Berkshire County, demonstrating adaptive utensils, mobility and transfer supports, low-cost communication devices, and environmental aids that could immediately assist with daily tasks. Staff also shared accessible materials outlining the AT Act Program’s device loan, reuse, and training services. This collaboration strengthened referral pathways and increased Hearthway staff capacity to connect residents to AT resources. As awareness grew, more residents requested device loans and demonstrations, resulting in improved independence, safer home environments, and greater participation in community life throughout western Massachusetts.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 111 44 155
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 70 25 95
Representative of Education 69 05 74
Representative of Employment 03 00 03
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 35 06 41
Representative of Community Living 46 13 59
Representative of Technology 10 01 11
Unable to Categorize 03 02 05
Total 347 96 443

Referral Types:

Unlike FY24, during FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program did not undertake additional activities using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding, and no Assistive Technology Training and Expo was held during the fiscal year. As a result, referral levels did not experience the same growth associated with one-time ARPA-funded initiatives in prior years. Nevertheless, several ongoing initiatives continued to support awareness of and engagement with the State AT Act Program. In particular, the rebranding and continued operation of the AT-DME Reuse Program remained an important source of referrals. In addition, the Assistive Technology Regional Centers (ATRCs) continued to carry out extensive Information and Assistance activities across the Commonwealth. Through direct engagement with individuals, families, service providers, and partner organizations, the ATRCs provided guidance on assistive technology options, program eligibility, and pathways to services, further strengthening connections to the State AT Act Program. The enhanced visibility of the reuse program, coupled with its broader range of assistive technology devices and the ongoing Information and Assistance activities of the ATRCs, continued to connect individuals with the State AT Act Program and its services. In addition, MassAbility supported outreach efforts by featuring information about the State AT Act Program in its regular publication, Commissioner’s Communications, and other communication channels. These internal and external vehicles helped reinforce awareness of the program among partner agencies, providers, and stakeholders across the Commonwealth. Overall, while no new large-scale outreach initiatives were launched in FY25, the combination of sustained AT-DME reuse activities, ongoing Information and Assistance services delivered by the ATRCs, and continued communications through MassAbility helped maintain steady referral activity. Referral types and sources remained largely consistent with prior years. --- Rebranding and Continued Operation of the State Reuse Program The rebranding and centralization of the State Reuse Program, implemented in earlier fiscal years, continued to yield benefits in FY25. By incorporating a wider range of assistive technology devices alongside durable medical equipment, the program remained well positioned to meet the needs of individuals seeking affordable AT solutions. The ATRCs played a key role in supporting the reuse program by providing Information and Assistance to individuals exploring reuse options, facilitating referrals, and helping consumers navigate available AT resources. Although no new statewide awareness campaign was launched during FY25, prior outreach efforts, established partnerships, and ongoing ATRC engagement continued to generate referrals. Healthcare providers, educators, rehabilitation counselors, and community-based organizations remained familiar with the reuse program and its connection to the State AT Act Program, contributing to a steady flow of referrals.

Referral Sources:

In FY25, the Massachusetts State AT Act Program continued to receive referrals from a broad and diverse range of sources, reflecting statewide reach and strong, sustained partnerships. Many of these referrals were supported by the ongoing Information and Assistance activities of the ATRCs, which served as trusted regional points of contact for assistive technology information and services. Sister State Agencies Referrals continued to be received from sister state agencies, including the Massachusetts Office on Disability, the Massachusetts Commission for the Blind, the Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, and the Department of Developmental Services. These agencies collectively remained a significant source of referrals and ensured statewide access for individuals with a wide range of disabilities. Non-State Organizations Non-state organizations continued to play an important role in referring individuals to the program. Advocacy organizations, Independent Living Centers, senior centers, and Area Agencies on Aging remained consistent referral sources, representing urban, suburban, and rural communities across the Commonwealth. Healthcare and Individual Practitioners Hospitals, healthcare institutions, and individual healthcare practitioners continued to refer individuals to the program in FY25. These referrals reflected both metropolitan and smaller community-based healthcare settings, helping to maintain statewide coverage. Educators, Case Workers, and Rehabilitation Counselors Educators, case workers, and rehabilitation counselors also continued to refer individuals with disabilities to the State AT Act Program. Their referrals supported access to assistive technology in educational, vocational, and rehabilitation contexts throughout the state.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Yes
Yes
During FY25, the State AT Act Program conducted outreach to the State Education Agency to maintain visibility of assistive technology resources and reinforce awareness of AT services available to students with disabilities, educators, and related service providers. While no formal or jointly funded initiative was implemented during the reporting period, outreach activities included ongoing communication and information sharing regarding device demonstration, device loan, and reuse services offered through the State AT Act Program. The primary collaborating organizations were the State AT Act Program and the State Education Agency. The State AT Act Program served as the source of information, technical expertise, and referrals related to assistive technology, while the State Education Agency supported dissemination of information through existing education networks and stakeholder channels. Individuals served or benefited included students with disabilities, families, educators, and school-based service providers seeking information about assistive technology options. Funding used to support these efforts consisted of existing State AT Act Program resources and staff time. No additional or braided funding was utilized.
Although FY25 outreach did not result in a formal collaborative initiative, continued engagement helped sustain awareness of assistive technology within the education system. Access to AT was supported through referrals to existing demonstration, loan, and reuse services, and awareness of AT resources was maintained among education stakeholders.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education, Transition (school to work or congregate care to community),

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Training,

Yes
Yes
In FY25, outreach was conducted with the Vocational Rehabilitation Agency to maintain coordination and promote awareness of State AT Act Program services that support employment and vocational outcomes. While no formal collaboration or jointly funded initiative was implemented during the reporting period, MassAbility supported the State AT Act Program by promoting its services internally and to provider partners connected to the vocational rehabilitation system. The major collaborating organizations were the State AT Act Program and the Vocational Rehabilitation Agency within MassAbility. The State AT Act Program provided information on assistive technology demonstrations, loans, and reuse services, while the Vocational Rehabilitation Agency assisted with dissemination through internal communications and partner networks. Individuals served or benefited included vocational rehabilitation counselors, providers, and individuals with disabilities pursuing employment or training. Funding consisted of existing State AT Act Program resources and staff time, with no additional funding leveraged.
Outreach efforts helped sustain awareness of assistive technology as a tool to support employment-related goals. While access to AT did not change as a result of a new collaborative initiative, individuals continued to be referred to existing AT services through established channels. The reach of the State AT Act Program was maintained within the vocational rehabilitation system, and planning discussions initiated during FY25 laid the groundwork for future collaboration. In particular, coordination with MassAbility’s Learning and Engagement Unit is underway to support potential training activities in FY26. A key lesson learned was the value of internal agency champions and communication platforms in extending program reach. Provided funding and resources are available, collaborative training efforts are expected to continue. For replication, states should align AT outreach with workforce development priorities and staff training structures within vocational rehabilitation agencies.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Employment, Community Participation and Integration, Information and Communication Technology/Remote Connectivity,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Training,

Yes
Yes
During FY25, the State AT Act Program conducted outreach with the Aging Agency to maintain communication and explore opportunities to support older adults through assistive technology. Outreach activities focused on information sharing and relationship maintenance rather than implementation of a formal joint initiative. The primary collaborating organizations were the State AT Act Program and the Aging Agency, including entities within the Aging and Disability Network. The State AT Act Program provided information about AT demonstrations, loans, and reuse services, while the Aging Agency served as a conduit for future outreach and collaboration discussions. Individuals who stand to benefit include older adults, caregivers, and service providers seeking solutions to support independence and aging in place. Funding used for outreach consisted of existing State AT Act Program resources, with no additional funding applied.
While FY25 outreach did not result in measurable changes to AT access through a formal initiative, ongoing communication supported continued awareness of assistive technology within the aging services network. The reach of the State AT Act Program was sustained by remaining engaged in discussions aligned with aging and disability services. A key lesson learned was that consistent dialogue is essential to identifying shared priorities and timing for future collaboration. Conversations initiated or continued during FY25 are expected to inform more structured outreach or training activities in future years, contingent on available funding and capacity. For replication, other programs may benefit from maintaining active engagement with aging agencies even when immediate collaboration is not feasible.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Health, Aging, Aging and Disability Network/No Wrong Door,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Training, Information & Assistance,

Yes
Yes
n FY25, outreach was conducted with the state Medicaid agency, MassHealth, to strengthen coordination and identify potential areas for future collaboration related to assistive technology. A significant development during the reporting period was the appointment of a new MassHealth representative to the State AT Act Program Advisory Council. The major collaborating organizations were the State AT Act Program and MassHealth. The State AT Act Program provided expertise on assistive technology services and systems, while MassHealth’s participation on the Advisory Council facilitated information exchange and relationship building. Individuals served or benefited include Medicaid beneficiaries who may benefit from increased awareness or access to assistive technology through future coordinated efforts. Funding for these activities consisted of existing State AT Act Program resources and did not involve new or braided funding.
The addition of a Medicaid representative to the Advisory Council increased opportunities for dialogue and mutual understanding between the State AT Act Program and MassHealth. While no immediate changes to AT access or funding occurred during FY25, awareness of the State AT Act Program within the Medicaid agency increased. The reach of the State AT Act Program was strengthened through formal representation in Medicaid-related discussions, creating a foundation for future collaboration. A key lesson learned was the importance of advisory council participation as a mechanism for sustained coordination. Provided funding and resources are available, discussions are expected to continue into future fiscal years. For replication, states may consider engaging Medicaid agencies through advisory roles as an effective first step toward deeper collaboration.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Health,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Information & Assistance,

Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities 0

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
State Appropriations$1,343,807ReuseTrue
State Appropriations$1,067,484Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Amount: $2,411,291

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.

During FY25, leveraged funding supported AT-DME Reuse activities only. All reuse-related activities supported by leveraged funding were reported in the Reuse section of the APR.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

No unique data issues to report.

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY24 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.