Back to state program information page
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 32 | 03 | 35 |
| Approved Not made | 25 | 11 | 36 |
| Rejected | 15 | 24 | 39 |
| Total | 72 | 38 | 110 |
| Lowest Income: | $12,084 | Highest Income: | $490,999 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $3,764,956 | 35 | $107,570 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 02 | 06 | 03 | 03 | 01 | 20 | 35 |
| Percentage of Loans | 5.71% | 17.14% | 8.57% | 8.57% | 2.86% | 57.14% | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 09 | 25.71% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 26 | 74.29% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 35 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 35 | $1,217,286 |
| Total | 35 | $1,217,286 |
| Lowest | 3% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 7.74% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 166 | 35 | 4.74028571428571% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 17 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 07 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 11 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 35 |
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 02 | $5,954 |
| Hearing | 03 | $7,448 |
| Speech communication | 01 | $3,776 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $2,384 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 02 | $9,654 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 25 | $1,186,022 |
| Computers and related | 01 | $2,048 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 35 | $1,217,286 |
| Number Loans in default | 03 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $62,099 |
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 2 |
|---|
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 144 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 3 |
| C. Total Served | 147 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 147 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 20 | $405 | $0 | $405 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 1 | $50 | $0 | $50 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 33 | $395 | $0 | $395 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 4 | $95 | $0 | $95 |
| Daily living | 290 | $3,895 | $0 | $3,895 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 34 | $345 | $0 | $345 |
| Total | 382 | $5,185 | $0 | $5,185 |
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Cooperative Buying Program |
|---|
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 196 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
| C. Total Served | 196 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 77 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 119 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 120 | $96,198 | $85,550 | $10,648 |
| Hearing | 3 | $809 | $744 | $65 |
| Speech communication | 841 | $109,740 | $95,236 | $14,504 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 371 | $58,731 | $53,671 | $5,060 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 85 | $1,849 | $1,661 | $188 |
| Environmental adaptations | 36 | $13,969 | $12,612 | $1,357 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 16 | $3,273 | $2,980 | $293 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 82 | $12,721 | $11,756 | $965 |
| Total | 1554 | $297,290 | $264,210 | $33,080 |
In April 2025, Lisa reached out to MDTAP's fabrication coordinator to request help developing a 3D custom-fabricated guitar pick. Lisa shared "I am so grateful to have been put in touch with Nora and MDTAP, where she created an adaptive guitar pick holder for me. It was wonderful to have input on the project to be sure it gave the assistance I needed, and after a few prototypes, she nailed it! I have an incomplete spinal cord injury from an Air Force accident, classical Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a rare genetic condition causing severe joint hypermobility issues), rheumatoid arthritis and many more problems from injuries and surgeries affecting my hands and fingers, so grasping a regular pick was not possible. This custom device allowed me to comfortably use one for the first time! MDTAP is an amazing program, offering innovative solutions to those with physical challenges where off-the-shelf adaptive devices aren't available. Huge thanks to them for their creativity, determination and life-changing assistance!"
In March 2025, Laura, a kindergarten teacher at a local school, reached out to the 3D printing fabrication program to request assistance for a student who was experiencing difficulty zipping his jacket. Ensuring the correct sizing, MDTAP printed and sent a custom zipper pull in a the student's preferred color. Laura reached back out to the program to share, "Today I put the zipper pull on the coat of a kindergarten student. He was so excited to be able to pull up his zipper himself. His mom told me he often wears 2 shirts to stay warm because he doesn't want to stick out and ask someone to pull up the zipper!"
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 09 | 81 | 77 | 167 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 00 | 51 | 57 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 01 | 20 | 22 |
| 4. Subtotal | 16 | 82 | 148 | 246 |
| 5. None of the above | 20 | 02 | 33 | 55 |
| 6. Subtotal | 36 | 84 | 181 | 301 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 36 | 84 | 181 | 301 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 44.44% | 97.62% | 81.77% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 337 | 89.15% |
| Satisfied | 34 | 8.99% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 1.06% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 03 | 0.79% |
| Total Surveyed | 378 | |
| Response rate % | 99.21% |
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 01 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 83 |
| C. Total | 84 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 84 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 01 | $60 | $0 | $60 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 01 | $60 | $0 | $60 |
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 78 | $42,334 | $0 | $42,334 |
| Hearing | 03 | $315 | $0 | $315 |
| Speech Communication | 12 | $94,424 | $0 | $94,424 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 08 | $927 | $0 | $927 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 | $158 | $0 | $158 |
| Daily Living | 103 | $1,497 | $0 | $1,497 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 11 | $5,022 | $0 | $5,022 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 12 | $1,748 | $0 | $1,748 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 228 | $146,425 | $0 | $146,425 |
During the summer of 2025, the AT Reuse Coordinator with MDTAP connected with Metro Speech Therapy, a company that provides speech therapy services to children and adults. Out of this connection, an SLP working at Metro Speech Therapy offered to set up an AT donation box in the therapy office lobby. This would provide patients an opportunity to easily donate out-of-date AAC devices, from low tech to high tech. Since August 2025, there have been two (2) iPads added to the box for donation. We're hopeful that this donation box will continue to serve as an easy, centralized location for giving away unwanted equipment. As this model proves effective, MDTAP intends to connect with other speech organizations across the state to replicate.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 02 | 68 | 75 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 02 | 05 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 70 | 80 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 6. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 74 | 84 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 08 | 02 | 74 | 84 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 94.59% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 84 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 84 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
During FY25, the AT Reuse Coordinator, an FTE with TAP, took on the added responsibility of covering a 16-week parental leave absence for our AT Clinician. This effectively redirected her from primarily reuse work to facilitating the majority of MDTAP's AT consultations, demonstrations, device loans, and AT Library tours. This re-focus impacted the number of reuse clients served (less outreach to viable candidates & programs), as well as reduced her time collaborating with organizations and agencies to solicit donations into the program. Additionally, during FY24, the reuse program was the recipient of a substantial donation of Blind/low vision equipment from a vendor going out of business. At the time, that large donation resulted in more devices being immediately donated back out to consumers. We did not receive any similar donation in FY2025, which subsequently also reduced the number of reuse recipients.
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 200 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 02 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 07 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 06 |
| Total | 215 |
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 110 | 03 | 113 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 33 | 01 | 34 |
| Representative of Education | 19 | 05 | 24 |
| Representative of Employment | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 25 | 01 | 26 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 06 | 05 | 11 |
| Representatives of Technology | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Total | 200 | 15 | 215 |
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 128 | 07 | 135 |
| Hearing | 40 | 02 | 42 |
| Speech Communication | 61 | 02 | 63 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 13 | 00 | 13 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Daily Living | 48 | 23 | 71 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 25 | 08 | 33 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 38 | 05 | 43 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 20 | 06 | 26 |
| Total | 377 | 53 | 430 |
Angela, an Occupational therapy student with upper extremity (UE) injuries (shoulder girdle fracture) experienced limited mobility with her right UE functionality, impacting her ability to type on the keyboard for school and clinicals. She was typing one-handed but was looking for assistance using dictation software. Angela visited the AT Library to learn how to enable her computer to allow dictating messages. However, she was still concerned about using dictation in class including the noise levels in the classroom and accuracy of the dictated messages. After exploring solutions with our AT Clinician, MDTAP loaned the Steno Microphone to plug into her computer, which muffles the voice into the microphone, so surrounding classmates don't hear it. When she first borrowed it, she discovered that she was getting no signal, making it non-functional for her needs. MDTAP contacted the Steno Microphone manufacturer asking why the mic wouldn't it work on Angela’s computer even though it was working on MDTAP's computer. The answer was that new computers have integrated 1 3.5 mm jack for headphones OR a microphone. The computer wasn't recognizing the microphone as a "microphone" but rather as headphones. MDTAP purchased an Aux jack Splitter to bifurcate the original single 3.5 mm jack into two separate 3.5 mm jacks. When Angela plugged the mic in this time, she was able to successfully dictate a message as the computer recognized the microphone appropriately. Eventually, Angela was able to speak with her Fieldwork Coordinator for her occupational therapy placement to allow the microphone as a reasonable accommodation and she got her own and has been using it successfully.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 17 | 15 | 121 | 153 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 02 | 18 | 22 |
| Subtotal | 19 | 17 | 139 | 175 |
| Have not made a decision | 07 | 02 | 09 | 18 |
| Subtotal | 26 | 19 | 148 | 193 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 07 | 07 |
| Total | 26 | 19 | 155 | 200 |
| Performance on this measure | 73.08% | 89.47% | 93.92% | |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 04 | 07 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 01 | 03 | 06 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 4. Subtotal | 05 | 01 | 09 | 15 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 05 | 01 | 09 | 15 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 05 | 01 | 09 | 15 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 196 | 91.16% |
| Satisfied | 18 | 8.37% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.47% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 215 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 79 |
| Hearing | 17 |
| Speech Communication | 44 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 08 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 |
| Daily Living | 26 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 13 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 196 |
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 104 | 08 | 112 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 38 | 11 | 49 |
| Representatives of Education | 16 | 01 | 17 |
| Representatives of Employment | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 28 | 05 | 33 |
| Representative of Community Living | 08 | 06 | 14 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 196 | 31 | 227 |
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
| Service Provider | 02 |
| Vendor | 02 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 02 |
| Total | 06 |
MDTAP was contacted by a service coordinator and direct service professional, seeking communication and sensory engagement ideas for a young man receiving integrated community services. MDTAP staff met with Charles and his team to demonstrate a variety of AAC options. Because Charles had used a TouchChat in school, we started with re-introducing him to this high-tech, dynamic display, 12-cell AAC option. However, it was immediately clear that Charles was not interacting with the device with intention. After further exploration, we found that he was especially responsive to tactile communication switches, with fewer choices. We provided guidance and recommendations on how to establish functional communication training and recommended mands using Talking Brix during the AT demonstration. This successful interaction and subsequent device loan resulted in Charles being able to tell his DSP, for the first time in his adult-services program, when he was hungry, needed to use the bathroom, and answer yes/no questions.
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 21 | 07 | 129 | 157 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 01 | 11 | 13 |
| Subtotal | 22 | 08 | 140 | 170 |
| Have not made a decision | 05 | 02 | 13 | 20 |
| Subtotal | 27 | 10 | 153 | 190 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
| Total | 27 | 10 | 159 | 196 |
| Performance on this measure | 81.48% | 80% | 88.05% | |
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 211 | 92.95% |
| Satisfied | 15 | 6.61% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.44% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 227 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 17 | 83 | 149 | 249 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 11 | 01 | 56 | 68 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 01 | 22 | 24 |
| 4. Subtotal | 29 | 85 | 227 | 341 |
| 5. None of the above | 20 | 02 | 37 | 59 |
| 6. Subtotal | 49 | 87 | 264 | 400 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 49 | 87 | 264 | 400 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 57.14% | 96.55% | 77.65% | 79.25% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 38 | 22 | 250 | 310 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 03 | 29 | 35 |
| Subtotal | 41 | 25 | 279 | 345 |
| Have not made a decision | 12 | 04 | 22 | 38 |
| Subtotal | 53 | 29 | 301 | 383 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 13 | 13 |
| Total | 53 | 29 | 314 | 396 |
| Performance on this measure | 77.36% | 86.21% | 90.88% | 88.69% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.33% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 99.67% | 90% | Met |
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 158 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 37 |
| Representatives of Education | 193 |
| Representatives of Employment | 102 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 105 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 37 |
| Representatives of Technology | 145 |
| Unable to Categorize | 333 |
| TOTAL | 1,110 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 777 | 231 | 102 | 1,110 |
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 186 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 98 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 11 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 784 |
| Transition | 31 |
| Total | 1,110 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
MDTAP conducted a training on "How to create accessible e-learning modules" for state government learning spaces. 66 people were in attendance. This training has led to multiple consultations with ICT staff on implementing accessibility practices when creating new training content for either in-agency or Workday Learning. As a direct result of this training, we anticipate more sharing of this resource and enforcement of accessibility compliance within the Maryland Department of Budget and Management (DBM) for any content uploaded to Workday Learning.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
MDTAP staff hosted a training on AT For Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. This session focused on a topic we had not previously covered, emphasizing AT solutions to improve behavioral outcomes for people with disabilities. The content covered a variety of AT as it pertains to characteristics of EBDs, and provided possible solutions for a variety of needs. 49 people registered with 13 attendees; however all registrants received a copy of the slides and the recording of the session. After this session, staff was contacted by two families seeking consultations and demonstrations of AT options. These subsequently resulted in AT device loans.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
MDTAP provided a training on evaluating and ensuring accessibility in digital procurements, to the Maryland Department of Transportation. Eleven (11) people were in attendance, ranging from leadership to procurement officers. MDOT staff learned about a new process to implement when conducting agency procurements requiring they perform a cursory accessibility check of a product before purchasing, to ensure the product meets Maryland standards. Further, agency staff learned about the ADA Title II Rulemaking, its impact on their agency, and the steps they should start taking to comply. With this high impact training, MDOT leadership noted they would begin implementing checks and best practices with the development of new materials (documents and apps) for accessibility.
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 116 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 168 |
| No known outcome at this time | 439 |
| Nonrespondent | 61 |
| Total | 784 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 36.2% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Not Met |
| Education | 06% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 24% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
| Community Living | 19% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 51% |
| Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
MDTAP coordinated with the Maryland Statewide EEO Office to determine what guidance was provided to state ADA Coordinators regarding access to and implementation of AT in the workplace. After initial conversations with EEO leadership, we created, presented, and distributed a survey to all state ADA Coordinators to determine how we might collaborate with the EEO Office on ways to build systematic change around the understanding and accessing of AT amongst ADA coordinators. Final results of the survey were presented to the EEO Office, and planning for a 3-part online education module is now in development, to be available in FY26 for all state ADA coordinators. The plan further includes the following objectives that will result in a streamlined process for accessing and implementing AT solutions in state employment: 1. We create a 3-part online training covering: AT Fundamentals (Create a foundational module covering common categories of AT for various disabilities, how to identify po
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Families were sharing with State Agency Transition Collaborative (SATC) members that they felt overwhelmed by the transition process, and were requesting a tool that would tell them what to do at each age of their youth. IN the state of Maryland, transition services begin at age 14 or 9th grade, whichever comes first. In partnership with agencies involved in the SATC, including Department of Disabilities AT Program, Division of Rehabilitation Services, MSDE, and more, the group created a visual roadmap (age band) to help families. On the back page , the group included a section for families to enter their local contact for each agency that they may be applying for as their youth moves through the transition process. In July, as MDTAP was involved in reviewing this roadmap, we included specific markers around AT considerations and linkage to the "AT in Transition" checklist, to encourage greater use of the checklist in planning for AT needs post-school. By ensuring more direct partner
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. MDTAP staff presented a session at the Maryland Youth Leadership Forum (YLF) hosted by Independence Now, a Center for Independent Living in Maryland. The YLF aims to support youth with disabilities across the state, noting its mission of "Maryland Youth Leadership Forum Delegates build leadership skills and prepare for future employment, higher education, and independent living." This one hour presentation explained the adaptive gaming systems for the Nintendo Switch and the Microsoft Xbox One. Additionally, the presenter explained MDTAP services and shared information on the DSCI Service year option, a new state-facilitated employment-track established at the cabinet-level and utilized to support skill development in youth not attending college. The YLF attendees (transition-age youth with disabilities) had the opportunity to try out adapted gaming systems and ask questions about AT, accessibility, and assistive technology services at the end of the presentation.
2. MDTAP staff presented on "Hearing Assistive Technology Services & Resources" to 68 attendees at the MD State Department of Education State Steering Committee conference for Deaf & Hard of Hearing Students. Attendees were administrators and staff across the state who serve students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Staff reviewed statewide resources, services, a variety of assistive technology solutions as applicable in the classroom, and hosted an in-depth discussion of Hearing AT available in the AT Lending Library. This presentation led to further discussions and device loans to educators seeking greater supports for their students with hearing loss.
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 220 | 50 | 270 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 97 | 30 | 127 |
| Representative of Education | 53 | 136 | 189 |
| Representative of Employment | 17 | 206 | 223 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 41 | 15 | 56 |
| Representative of Community Living | 69 | 67 | 136 |
| Representative of Technology | 11 | 04 | 15 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 03 | 03 |
| Total | 508 | 511 | 1,019 |
During FY25, MDTAP focused greater outreach to education partners (including the SEA and LEAs) and employment partners (particularly outreach to other state agencies). As a result, we saw a larger source of referrals to the AT program coming from schools and state agencies. This outreach included direct involvement with school transition teams at the LEA level, and outreach to state ADA coordinators and HR staff across executive-level agencies as we evaluated ways in which to best support new and long-term state employees with disabilities.
MDTAP coordinates with a variety of referring partners throughout the year. Some of the largest referral sources come from community partners, including the Maryland Development Disabilities Administration (DDA) and their many provider agencies. Through this work and continued presentations to the agencies, CCS , and regional staff meetings, we've substantially increased the number of referrals coming from provider agencies seeking consultations, demonstrations, and device loans for clients. We've also provided intensive case management for those who've been denied AT services & supports within their Medicaid waiver requests.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
|---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
MDOD, specifically the IT Accessibility staff within MDTAP, became an operations partner with the Department of Service and Civic Innovation which runs the Maryland Service Year program. This program is intended to offer Maryland high school graduates a way to build relevant job skills and encourage hiring in the state. Participants will earn the federal 508 Trusted Tester certification and an IT Accessibility apprenticeship credential from the US Dept of Labor. MDOD is hosting two Service Year members in this position; they are expected to complete the program June 2026. There are 4 other participants in this curriculum.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
MDOD created the curriculum for this new Digital Accessibility Track within the Service Year for IT Accessibility. Further details on the curriculum and training can be provided by the Statewide IT Accessibility Initiative team members - Stephen Polacek (stephen.polacek@maryland.gov) and Dan Doggett (dan.doggett@maryland.gov).
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Employment
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The Maryland AT Program, IT Accessibility staff, developed an online Plain Language module in collaboration with the Plain Language Initiative workgroup in response to the Governor's Executive Order on Plain Language issued last year. The training aims to inform state employees about the importance of using plain language and provides instruction on how to implement it effectively.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
The final training module can be found on the internal state learning hub, Workday. For details on the module and content, questions can be directed to Dan Doggett, dan.doggett@maryland.gov.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal | $700,000 | State Financing | True |
| Amount: $700,000 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||