National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Back to state program information page
Kansas 2025
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 11 | 17 | 28 |
| Approved Not made | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Rejected | 07 | 04 | 11 |
| Total | 18 | 22 | 40 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $13,740 | Highest Income: | $246,000 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $1,399,980 | 28 | $49,999 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 03 | 02 | 07 | 05 | 08 | 03 | 28 |
| Percentage of Loans | 10.71% | 7.14% | 25% | 17.86% | 28.57% | 10.71% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 28 | 100% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 28 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 28 | $429,410 |
| Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 28 | $429,410 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 5.5% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 5.5% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 154 | 28 | 5.5% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 28 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 28 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 01 | $3,361 |
| Hearing | 03 | $13,250 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $13,909 |
| Daily living | 04 | $34,023 |
| Environmental adaptations | 01 | $9,024 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 14 | $354,212 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 01 | $1,631 |
| Total | 28 | $429,410 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 06 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $23,008 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 2 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Last resort - Activity |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 189 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 496 |
| C. Total Served | 685 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 685 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 73 | $73,990 |
| Hearing | 76 | $33,147 |
| Speech communication | 66 | $111,882 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 64 | $33,679 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 129 | $51,768 |
| Daily living | 220 | $44,633 |
| Environmental adaptations | 22 | $51,713 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 5 | $13,400 |
| Computers and related | 30 | $38,369 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 3 | $5,442 |
| Total | 688 | $458,023 |
Activity 2
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 116 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 111 |
| C. Total Served | 227 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 227 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 68 | $37,154 |
| Hearing | 84 | $34,373 |
| Speech communication | 34 | $20,291 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 63 | $38,715 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 1 | $279 |
| Daily living | 3 | $1,805 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 253 | $132,617 |
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
D. Anecdote
Kara is a determined young woman with both hearing and vision impairments, and staying connected to others has always mattered to her. But her old phone couldn’t connect to her cochlear implant, and the screen didn’t magnify enough, making daily tasks—especially at work—difficult. Her mother, who shares the same genetic condition and had experience with Assistive Technology for Kansans (ATK) and the Telecommunications Access Program (TAP), encouraged Kara to seek support. Through TAP, Kara received the 16e iPhone, designed specifically for people with hearing and vision loss—and it changed everything. With strong amplification and magnification features, the 16e has helped Kara thrive both at home and on the job. She works full-time at Walmart, recently earned Employee of the Month, and uses the phone’s features daily to communicate with coworkers when walkie-talkies aren’t available. “The phone works wonders,” Kara says. “It helps me so much at work and at home. Staying in touch is easier—and fun!” The 16e’s compatibility with her hearing aids and its powerful sound amplification allow her to hear clearly in the busy store environment. With her mother’s guidance, TAP’s support, and accessible technology, Kara isn’t just staying connected—she’s thriving.
Jonathan Warren, a 44-year-old resident of Wichita, Kansas, lives independently despite significant challenges. A year ago, Jonathan underwent surgery that resulted in the loss of his mobility, and he now relies entirely on a wheelchair. He also has low vision, making it difficult for him to see clearly. Jonathan’s case manager at Arrowhead, the day services program he attends, reached out to Assistive Technology for Kansans (ATK) Staff to explore whether an Alexa device could help support his daily living needs. After completing a demonstration, ATK Staff confirmed that an Alexa would be an excellent tool to enhance Jonathan’s independence at home. The Alexa device quickly became a game-changer. Jonathan could now answer phone calls hands-free—something that had been difficult when he couldn’t physically reach his phone in time. During a home visit, ATK Staff also identified additional ways to make his home more accessible and fully voice-controlled. ATK Staff provided his case manager with a plan that included smart light bulbs, a Ring doorbell with a camera, a keyless door handle, a smart thermostat, and smart plug-ins for added convenience. With support from his case manager and ATK Staff, Jonathan secured full funding for all recommended items through Sunflower Health Plans. ATK Staff worked directly with him to set up each device, and he was thrilled to discover how easily he could control his lights, TV, thermostat, and even answer his door—using only his voice. Jonathan shared that these simple additions have made an enormous difference. With accessible smart-home technology in place, he regained the ability to manage many daily tasks independently—restoring confidence, comfort, and a renewed sense of control in his own home.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 75 | 30 | 582 | 687 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 02 | 13 | 17 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 01 | 18 | 24 |
| 4. Subtotal | 82 | 33 | 613 | 728 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 02 | 48 | 51 |
| 6. Subtotal | 83 | 35 | 661 | 779 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 12 | 08 | 141 | 161 |
| 8. Total | 95 | 43 | 802 | 940 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 86.32% | 76.74% | 76.43% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 682 | 72.55% |
| Satisfied | 140 | 14.89% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 17 | 1.81% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 101 | 10.74% |
| Total Surveyed | 940 | |
| Response rate % | 89.26% |
G. Notes:
This year, Assistive Technology transitioned to a new database. As a result, data measures for this year were impacted. We have proactively trained our staff and collaborated closely with our database developers to refine and update the system, ensuring the most accurate and reliable data collection moving into FY 2026.
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 608 |
| C. Total | 608 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 608 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 01 | $1,000 | $0 | $1,000 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 469 | $420,238 | $0 | $420,238 |
| Daily Living | 185 | $60,939 | $0 | $60,939 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $700 | $0 | $700 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 | $1,950 | $0 | $1,950 |
| Total | 659 | $484,827 | $0 | $484,827 |
D. Anecdote
In the spring, a school Occupational Therapist contacted ATK Staff about a student, Braxtyn New, who dreamed of joining the high school track team but needed a specialized racing wheelchair to participate. Knowing how important this opportunity was, ATK Staff began searching immediately. They secured an Eliminator OSR Racing Wheelchair by TOP END, confirmed the fit with the OT, and later delivered it to the school. The school soon posted photos of students practicing—and there was Braxtyn, proudly racing alongside his peers. At a track meet, ATK Staff met him along with his support staff member, Ms. Vicky. When asked what the racing wheelchair meant to him, Braxtyn said: “It gave me independence at being myself.” “It is the first time to ever be part of a team!” “I have made new friends.” “I get to cheer on other kids.” Ms. Vicky shared that Braxtyn’s teammates fully include him, often bringing him along to cheer during field events. She has seen him grow stronger physically and mentally, with improved attendance and better grades. Motivated and determined, Braxtyn now sets weekly goals for the 100-meter and 400-meter dash—driven by one big dream: He wants to go to State.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 28 | 13 | 433 | 474 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 11 | 12 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 09 | 11 |
| 4. Subtotal | 30 | 14 | 453 | 497 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 6. Subtotal | 30 | 14 | 457 | 501 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 107 | 107 |
| 8. Total | 30 | 14 | 564 | 608 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 80.32% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 409 | 67.27% |
| Satisfied | 182 | 29.93% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 15 | 2.47% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 02 | 0.33% |
| Total Surveyed | 608 | |
| Response rate % | 99.67% |
G. Notes:
This year we switched databases. We utilized two databases to report this years data. As a result we lost performance data. All lost data was entered as non-respondent. We have resolved these data errors and will have better data to report next year.
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 191 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 00 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 227 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 52 |
| Total | 470 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 49 | 56 | 105 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 27 | 18 | 45 |
| Representative of Education | 65 | 134 | 199 |
| Representative of Employment | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 36 | 43 | 79 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 07 | 12 | 19 |
| Representatives of Technology | 07 | 12 | 19 |
| Total | 191 | 279 | 470 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 06 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 30 | 23 | 53 |
| Hearing | 09 | 45 | 54 |
| Speech Communication | 47 | 30 | 77 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 45 | 124 | 169 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 32 | 24 | 56 |
| Daily Living | 14 | 15 | 29 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 02 | 05 | 07 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 10 | 06 | 16 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | 07 | 09 |
| Total | 191 | 279 | 470 |
E. Anecdote
On October 29th, Adolfo celebrated his 4th birthday—a milestone that reflects not only another year of life, but the incredible progress he continues to make. Born prematurely, Adolfo lives with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, motor and visual impairments, and is nonverbal. Yet despite these challenges, he consistently exceeds expectations with every new skill he learns. ATK staff began working with Adolfo in 2023, partnering closely with his physical therapist to identify equipment that could improve his daily routines. Early on, the focus was on securing a supportive bath chair and a gait trainer. With insurance support, Adolfo received the essential equipment he needed to safely participate in these activities. As services continued, his speech-language pathologist (SLP) reached out about exploring an Eye Gaze communication device. Because of Adolfo’s fine motor limitations, options like tablets or switches weren’t practical. ATK staff loaned an Eye Gaze device to him and worked through calibration challenges caused by his glasses and the room’s lighting. Turning off the lights made a dramatic difference. Once calibrated, Adolfo played a game where he could “pie” characters on the screen—and his joyful laughter made it clear he was ready for this next step. After six weeks of consistent Eye Gaze use, it became evident that this technology is the key to helping Adolfo express himself more fully. His SLP is now preparing the documentation needed to pursue funding for his own device so he can continue developing his communication skills. Adolfo’s journey is a powerful example of resilience and the life-changing impact of adaptive technology. ATK staff celebrate each milestone with him and look forward to many more successes ahead.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 108 | 08 | 28 | 144 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 00 | 08 | 18 |
| Subtotal | 118 | 08 | 36 | 162 |
| Have not made a decision | 04 | 10 | 09 | 23 |
| Subtotal | 122 | 18 | 45 | 185 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
| Total | 122 | 18 | 51 | 191 |
| Performance on this measure | 96.72% | 44.44% | 80% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 174 | 28 | 77 | 279 |
| 8. Total | 174 | 28 | 77 | 279 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 363 | 77.23% |
| Satisfied | 101 | 21.49% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.43% |
| Not at all satisfied | 03 | 0.64% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.21% |
| Total Surveyed | 470 | |
| Response rate % | 99.79% |
I. Notes:
This year, we transitioned to a new database system and used two databases to report our data. As a result, some performance data was lost and certain data points are slightly inaccurate. All missing data was recorded as non-respondent for acquisition performance measures. These issues have since been resolved, and we expect to have more accurate data to report next year. We have addressed these errors for this upcoming fiscal year.
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 98 |
| Hearing | 62 |
| Speech Communication | 63 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 52 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 49 |
| Daily Living | 57 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 04 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
| Computers and Related | 31 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 421 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 245 | 69 | 314 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 62 | 69 | 131 |
| Representatives of Education | 55 | 17 | 72 |
| Representatives of Employment | 01 | 01 | 02 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 24 | 21 | 45 |
| Representative of Community Living | 17 | 26 | 43 |
| Representative of Technology | 17 | 26 | 43 |
| Total | 421 | 229 | 650 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 27 |
| Service Provider | 01 |
| Vendor | 34 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 41 |
| Total | 103 |
D. Anecdote
Ezra is a 5-year-old boy who was diagnosed with autism about a year ago. ATK staff discussed AAC options and demonstrated several different communication devices to Ezra and his mother. Ezra had been using the TouchChat app, but his mother wanted to explore other options to ensure that solution best met his needs. ATK staff demonstration TD Snap, ProxTalker, and TouchChat. Ezra showed little interest in TD Snap and the ProxTalker—it quickly became clear that he preferred the TouchChat system he already knew. Arden was unsure how to navigate the next steps to secure funding, so ATK staff guided her through the process, including how to communicate with service providers and what information to share to ensure she reached the right people. We also coordinated with Ezra’s SLP to make sure everyone supporting him was on the same page. With the right tools and support in place, Ezra now uses his communication device to express himself more clearly. He can ask for his favorite snack—Fruit Loops—and tell his mom who he wants to spend time with. Watching Ezra gain the ability to share his wants and needs more independently has been incredibly rewarding.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 66 | 26 | 197 | 289 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 03 | 23 | 27 |
| Subtotal | 67 | 29 | 220 | 316 |
| Have not made a decision | 07 | 49 | 49 | 105 |
| Subtotal | 74 | 78 | 269 | 421 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 74 | 78 | 269 | 421 |
| Performance on this measure | 90.54% | 37.18% | 81.78% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 502 | 77.23% |
| Satisfied | 135 | 20.77% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 11 | 1.69% |
| Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.15% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.15% |
| Total | 650 | |
| Response rate % | 99.85% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 103 | 43 | 1,015 | 1,161 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 03 | 24 | 29 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 07 | 01 | 27 | 35 |
| 4. Subtotal | 112 | 47 | 1,066 | 1,225 |
| 5. None of the above | 01 | 02 | 52 | 55 |
| 6. Subtotal | 113 | 49 | 1,118 | 1,280 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 186 | 36 | 325 | 547 |
| 8. Total | 299 | 85 | 1,443 | 1,827 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 44.12% | 61.33% | 73.38% | 68.83% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 174 | 34 | 225 | 433 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 11 | 03 | 31 | 45 |
| Subtotal | 185 | 37 | 256 | 478 |
| Have not made a decision | 11 | 59 | 58 | 128 |
| Subtotal | 196 | 96 | 314 | 606 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
| Total | 196 | 96 | 320 | 612 |
| Performance on this measure | 94.39% | 38.54% | 81.53% | 78.88% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
Overall Satisfaction Rating
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 98.09% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 96.06% | 90% | Met |
Educational/Training Activities
A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 186 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 333 |
| Representatives of Education | 62 |
| Representatives of Employment | 10 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 303 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 49 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 |
| Unable to Categorize | 18 |
| TOTAL | 961 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 634 | 325 | 02 | 961 |
B. Educational/Training Activity Topics
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 902 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 04 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 52 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 02 |
| Transition | 01 |
| Total | 961 |
C. Description of Educational/Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Assistive Technology for Kansans (ATK) was invited by the state’s Brain Injury Association to present at their annual conference on how assistive technology can support individuals with acquired and traumatic brain injuries. ATK delivered a session focused on enhancing executive function skills using built-in accessibility features available on both Android and Apple devices. The presentation emphasized practical strategies for leveraging technology that already exists in a patient’s environment to improve organization, memory, task initiation, and overall daily functioning. Following the presentation, participants had the opportunity to engage in hands-on exploration of a variety of assistive technology tools through an interactive booth. This allowed attendees to apply concepts from the session and experience firsthand how accessible technology can support individuals with brain injuries.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Assistive Technology for Kansans hosted a full-day Early Intervention–focused training presented by Michelle Lange, OTR/L, ATP/SMS, centered on positioning, seating, and mobility for very young children. The course addressed how to determine when a child requires positioning intervention, evaluate whether current seating meets their needs, and consider alternative options such as adaptive seating systems, stationary standers, and lying systems. Mobility content emphasized providing on-time mobility through augmented power mobility solutions—including adapted ride-on toys—and assessing and developing readiness for eventual power wheelchair use. A key emphasis of the training was supporting smooth and successful transitions across developmental stages and service systems. The training was offered twice in different regions of the state, with a combined total of 130 participants in attendance.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Everyone must be able to access information, training materials, and online resources, regardless of disability. Ensuring accessibility is essential for equal participation, effective learning, and independent use of digital materials. Assistive Technology for Kansans staff provided an in-person training for 14 assistive technology and education professionals on how to add alternative text to images and PDFs. Upon completion, participants were able to successfully add alt text to their own images and documents, strengthening the accessibility of the materials they create and share.
D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 02 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 02 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
This year, Assistive Technology transitioned to a new database. As a result, data measures for this year were impacted. We have proactively trained our staff and collaborated closely with our database developers to refine and update the system, ensuring the most accurate and reliable data collection moving into FY 2026.
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 00% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 20% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 50% |
| Community Living | 30% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Assistive Technology for Kansans collaborated with Kansas Medicaid through both in-person and virtual meetings to strengthen understanding of assistive technology and improve access for Kansans. We first provided an in-person training for eight individuals from the Medicaid Clinical team on low-, mid-, and high-tech AAC devices, including hands-on exploration and guidance on when each device is appropriate. We also shared research on the need for ongoing support after a speech-generating device is acquired. A virtual meeting with Medicaid medical directors followed, where we discussed ATK’s role in helping individuals obtain medically necessary assistive technology and shared examples of its impact. Additionally, we provided information on other states’ Medicaid requirements for speech-generating devices to help Kansas streamline its own processes.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Assistive Technology for Kansans (ATK) was invited to participate in a Think Tank event to share expertise on assistive technology access, services, emerging trends, and existing gaps. The event brought together approximately 40 participants, including representatives from state agencies, assistive technology consumers, private companies such as Uber, service providers, researchers, state representatives, and Kansas broadband stakeholders. During the Think Tank, ATK provided valuable data to a state representative to help inform policy and systems change, emphasizing consumers’ rights to choose their own assistive technology and the critical role consumer choice plays in reducing device abandonment.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Assistive Technology for Kansans implemented a statewide assistive technology awareness effort that included an in-person Assistive Technology Fair and three virtual Assistive Technology Chats, supported by a grant focused on advancing Kansas as a Technology First state. The AT Fair engaged 40 attendees, and each virtual AT Chat averaged 35 participants, expanding access through both in-person and virtual formats. These events highlighted assistive technology solutions for medication management, memory, mental health, vision, hearing, employment, smart home, and activities of daily living, while increasing public awareness of assistive technology programs and services among consumers, providers, state agencies, and other key stakeholders across Kansas.
2. This year, Assistive Technology for Kansans strengthened public awareness efforts by expanding our social media outreach through targeted updates to our YouTube channel. These educational videos highlight assistive technology devices, available programs and services, and address common myths and facts related to the birth-to-three population. Since their release, the videos have received over 2,000 views, increasing community awareness and access to accurate information for families, caregivers, and professionals across the state.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 842 | 61 | 903 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 397 | 34 | 431 |
| Representative of Education | 65 | 46 | 111 |
| Representative of Employment | 32 | 00 | 32 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 83 | 13 | 96 |
| Representative of Community Living | 129 | 14 | 143 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Unable to Categorize | 13 | 00 | 13 |
| Total | 1,561 | 168 | 1,729 |
Referral Types:
This year, Assistive Technology for Kansans partnered with State of the States on a $1 million grant through the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services (KDADS) to support Kansas in becoming a Technology First state. This collaboration served as a key outreach strategy and significantly increased awareness of ATK among service providers and the general public. As a result, ATK observed increased engagement and referral activity from Centers for Independent Living, Community Developmental Disabilities Organizations, and advocacy groups, as well as growing interest from other service providers across the state. While numeric referral data and impact measures are still being finalized due to the six-month grant period, early trends and stakeholder feedback indicate that this partnership positively influenced referral volume and diversity.
Referral Sources:
Assistive Technology for Kansans (ATK) collaborates with 14 Centers for Independent Living across the state, which account for approximately 25% of referrals, while educators contribute about 20% through their ongoing relationship with ATK. Other partners—including Kansas Rehabilitation Services, Birth to Three, Aging and Disability Rights Centers, and the Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing—each provide roughly 5% of referrals, with the remaining referrals coming from word of mouth and ATK outreach efforts.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
Overview of State Improvement Activities
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
Additional And Leveraged Funds
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public/State Agency | $23,354 | Technical Assistance | True |
| Federal | $30,000 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $100,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Federal | $149,293 | Demonstration | True |
| Federal | $24,000 | Device Loan | True |
| Federal | $50,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
| Public/State Agency | $207,533 | Demonstration | True |
| Public/State Agency | $43,060 | Device Loan | True |
| Public/State Agency | $50,000 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $62,329 | Demonstration | True |
| Federal | $29,200 | Reuse | True |
| Federal | $210,000 | State Financing | True |
| Federal | $67,846 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $153,389 | Training | True |
| Public/State Agency | $314,210 | Reuse | True |
| Federal | $3,809 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $508,717 | Device Loan | True |
| Public/State Agency | $246,852 | State Financing | True |
| Amount: $2,273,592 |
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||