National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Back to state program information page
District of Columbia 2025
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $0 | Highest Income: | $0 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $0 | 00 | $0 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Percentage of Loans | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 00 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 0% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 0% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 00 | 00 | 0% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 00 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
D. Anecdote
n/a
n/a
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
| Total Surveyed | 00 | |
| Response rate % | NaN% |
G. Notes:
There were no financial loans during this reporting period.
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 183 |
| C. Total | 183 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 183 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 01 | $2,563 | $0 | $2,563 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | $50 | $0 | $50 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 201 | $19,494 | $0 | $19,494 |
| Daily Living | 43 | $2,192 | $0 | $2,192 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 246 | $24,299 | $0 | $24,299 |
D. Anecdote
DC Shares was contacted by the family of an individual with limited mobility who was recovering from surgery. The individual's doctor recommended a shower chair ($65) and a knee scooter ($287), but their insurance did not cover the equipment. DC Shares provided the client with a knee scooter and a shower chair at no cost. The retail value of the equipment is $352. The shower chair helped the client reduce the risk of falls. The knee scooter increased the client's mobility around their home and neighborhood. DC Shares saved the client $352.00, improved their mobility, and reduced the risk of falls.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 25 | 25 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 06 | 148 | 154 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 06 | 177 | 183 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 06 | 177 | 183 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 06 | 177 | 183 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 182 | 99.45% |
| Satisfied | 01 | 0.55% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 183 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
In FY25, DC Shares saved low-income DC residents with disabilities and seniors $25,946.00 by providing donated incontinence supplies.
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 21 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 02 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 00 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 03 |
| Total | 26 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 09 | 01 | 10 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Representative of Education | 04 | 02 | 06 |
| Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 06 | 00 | 06 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Total | 21 | 05 | 26 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 28 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 04 | 01 | 05 |
| Hearing | 05 | 01 | 06 |
| Speech Communication | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Daily Living | 07 | 00 | 07 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 16 | 05 | 21 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 42 | 07 | 49 |
E. Anecdote
A consumer with hemiparesis (arm and leg weakness on one side of the body) borrowed a Bluetooth miniature keyboard. She wanted to determine if the keyboard would help her type faster with one hand. She wants to improve her typing speed for future employment.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 06 | 01 | 13 | 20 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 13 | 21 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 07 | 01 | 13 | 21 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 07 | 01 | 13 | 21 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 00 | 02 | 04 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 4. Subtotal | 02 | 00 | 03 | 05 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 02 | 00 | 03 | 05 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 02 | 00 | 03 | 05 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 100% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 22 | 84.62% |
| Satisfied | 04 | 15.38% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 26 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 11 |
| Hearing | 06 |
| Speech Communication | 04 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 04 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
| Daily Living | 25 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 01 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 03 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 54 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 42 | 00 | 42 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representatives of Education | 05 | 00 | 05 |
| Representatives of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Representative of Community Living | 03 | 00 | 03 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 54 | 00 | 54 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
| Service Provider | 00 |
| Vendor | 07 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 07 |
D. Anecdote
The A.T. Specialist demonstrated Bluetooth personal amplifiers (BeHear Proxy and BeHear Smarto amplifiers) to a consumer with hearing impairment. The amplifiers were connected to her iPhone, but were insufficient due to her severe hearing loss. Nevertheless, she was informed about the built-in hearing accessibility features on her iPhone. The following accessibility features were enabled on her iPhone and demonstrated: Live Captions, LED Flash alerts, and vibration alerts. She said the captions would be beneficial during in-person and telephone conversations, and the flashing light alerts and vibration alerts would be helpful to notify her of incoming calls.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 06 | 05 | 43 | 54 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 05 | 43 | 54 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 06 | 05 | 43 | 54 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 06 | 05 | 43 | 54 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 45 | 83.33% |
| Satisfied | 09 | 16.67% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 54 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 25 | 25 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 06 | 150 | 158 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
| 4. Subtotal | 02 | 06 | 180 | 188 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 02 | 06 | 180 | 188 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 02 | 06 | 180 | 188 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 97.22% | 97.34% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 12 | 06 | 56 | 74 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 13 | 06 | 56 | 75 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Subtotal | 13 | 06 | 56 | 75 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 13 | 06 | 56 | 75 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Satisfaction Rating
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 100% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 100% | 90% | Met |
Educational/Training Activities
A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 42 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 |
| Representatives of Education | 75 |
| Representatives of Employment | 01 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 00 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 30 |
| Representatives of Technology | 04 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 152 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 152 | 00 | 00 | 152 |
B. Educational/Training Activity Topics
| Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 30 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 02 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 110 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 05 |
| Transition | 05 |
| Total | 152 |
C. Description of Educational/Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
The AT Specialist provided a high-impact training for 73 DC Public School occupational therapists during their quarterly professional development day. The training delivered critical, impactful knowledge about keyboarding instruction and assessment for students of varying abilities. The training offered active learning methods with simulations, discussions, collaborative engagement, and real-world scenarios. A simulation of an online keyboarding performance tool with built-in assistive technology features was provided. Evidence-based information and standards were provided. Additionally, various adaptive keyboards and pointer devices were available to the participants for hands-on access.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
In October 2024, the A.T. Specialist conducted an A.T. post-secondary transition training. The virtual workshop was hosted at George Washington University in honor of National Disability Employment Awareness Month. The training was titled AT at Work. It reviewed the Americans with Disabilities Act, three categories of reasonable accommodations, and services and resources offered by the DC Assistive Technology Program. In addition, assistive technology was featured that can assist individuals with disabilities in the workplace.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
On September 26, 2025, DCATP hosted a high-impact training teaching individuals how to create accessible Microsoft Word Documents. The title of the training was Accessibility Basics for Microsoft Word. The instructor was a senior accessibility trainer from an accessibility consulting organization. Five people attended the training. The training was interactive. Users were taught how to make existing documents accessible in Microsoft Word and convert them into accessible PDFs. They learned how to create an accessible Word document from a blank page. The information will enable participants to create accessible Microsoft Word and PDF documents for individuals with impaired vision and those who use screen readers. The participants can also use the information to train their staff and colleagues.
D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 04 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 01 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 05 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 30% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 00% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
| Community Living | 70% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The A.T. Specialist provided technical assistance for the Lt. Joseph P. Kennedy Institute of Catholic Charities known as The Kennedy School. The Kennedy School is a private, non-profit that functions as a special education program. The school received technical assistance from October 29, 2024, through November 27, 2024, via multiple in-person and email contacts. Initially, the AT Specialist provided updated information reported in the DC Municipal Regulations and Register documenting the school's responsibility for providing any needed technology required for the student’s education. Next, this A.T. Specialist assisted with developing an A.T. device funding/procurement strategy plan. This was requested to help minimize the upfront funding cost that can cause cash flow challenges for the school during various quarters of the school year. The proposed strategies were developed to foster increased fiscal management and help the school achieve its mission of education while providing need
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
On 11/13/24, the DCATP Program Manager attended the DDS Tech Summit Planning team meeting to provide technical assistance for the Mayor's Disability Tech Summit on December 5th and 6th 2024. The event was switched to a virtual event. The planning team was scheduled to meet weekly, unless indicated otherwise. The DCATP Program Manager provided advice related to assistive technology, Zoom technology, and concerns related to individuals with disabilities. In this meeting, the DCATP Program Manager: 1. Sent a four-minute DCATP overview video to the DDS meeting coordinator that will play during program intermissions along with other agency videos; 2. Recommended that presenters use the computer they used during the technology check-in to ensure their devices have the latest Zoom updates with a working microphone and video camera; 3. Sent the event flyer to clients, stakeholders, and interested individuals. Volunteers from the planning team will manage presentation slides and chat room quest
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The A.T. Specialist and Outreach Specialist attended the Mayor’s 26th Annual Senior Holiday Celebration at the DC Stadium Amory on December 11, 2024. The Department of Aging and Community Living hosted the event. Hundreds of seniors attended the event. Approximately 80 people visited the DC Assistive Technology Program (DCATP) table and received information about program services. Additionally, 49 participants signed up for possible services and resources offered by the DCATP. Low-tech and high-tech portable magnifiers were demonstrated at the event. DCATP staff networked with other vendors. Some organizations requested presentations for their staff and potential collaborations with DCATP.
2. On June 16, 2025, DCATP collaborated with the staff at Paul Lawrence Dunbar Apartments to conduct a "Cane and Walker Clinic" for DC seniors and individuals with disabilities to reduce their risk of falls at home and in the community. During this community outreach event, DCATP staff and volunteers measured residents for canes and walkers, completed program forms, and provided 22 seniors with canes, front-wheel walkers, and new cane and walker tips. Several other residents requested additional items from DC Shares. A few others expressed interest in visiting the Assistive Technology Resource Center to learn about devices to help individuals with visual and hearing impairments increase their function. Flyers about DCATP services and DC Shares promotional items were provided to the attendees.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 190 | 16 | 206 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 84 | 06 | 90 |
| Representative of Education | 09 | 02 | 11 |
| Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 22 | 03 | 25 |
| Representative of Community Living | 19 | 03 | 22 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 325 | 31 | 356 |
Referral Types:
DCATP collaborates with various community partners throughout the year to conduct training sessions and outreach events. These community partners provide many DCATP referrals. They refer clients for resources, training, device demonstrations, and device loans from our lending library. Some of our partners include the DC Public Libraries (DCPL), DC Public Schools (DCPS), the Department of Aging and Community Living (DACL), the DC Center for Independent Living (DC CIL), the Department on Disability Services (DDS), and local universities. DACL invites DCATP to various annual events where DCATP staff provide consumers and service providers with information sheets about our programs and services. These events generate calls and emails from consumers requesting DCATP services or a virtual or in-person presentation. Many of our representatives of Technology and Allied Health are the DCPL Center for Accessibility staff and therapists at DC Public Schools, Charter Schools, and local hospitals. They learn about DCATP via outreach events at DDS and the DCATP webpage. Representatives of Community Living are usually direct service providers, case managers, social workers, and staff from home health agencies. They learn about DCATP via DACL, DC Center for Independent Living (DCCIL), DCPL, DDS outreach events, our organization’s newsletter, and our social media. Individuals with disabilities and their family members are usually referred to DCATP by the DCPL Center for Accessibility, DC CIL, DDS, University Legal Services staff, the DCATP webpage, or social media.
Referral Sources:
Most DCATP referral sources are local to the Washington, DC Area. DCATP is listed as a resource on various organizations’ websites, including the DC CIL, the DC Department of Behavioral Health, AT3, CATADA, and ASHA. DCATP receives referrals from them. During FY 25, DCATP provided 352 referrals/assistance for 356 consumers. The information and assistance referrals were from the following sources: 1% DC CIL; 8% Department of Aging; 0.6% Protection and Advocacy; 8% Family, friends, and other individual advocates; 1% Other Disability and Advocacy Entities; 0.3% Educational Entities; 19% Healthcare Entities; 0.3% Insurance Entities; 1% Other Protection and Advocacy Entity; 20% DCATP website, social media, or online outreach; 13% Other website, social media, or online outreach (not from DCATP); 0.9% Print Materials; 3% In-person outreach; 11% Other awareness outreach initiative; 6% Past consumers; 5% Self-referrals; and 2% Unknown.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
| Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 0 |
|---|
Overview of State Improvement Activities
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
Additional And Leveraged Funds
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public/State Agency | $800 | Training | True |
| Federal | $10,000 | Training | True |
| Amount: $10,800 |
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplemental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the number of positions within the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document below the cumulative status of these funds, FY22 through FY25, as a final closeout report. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||