National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Tennessee 2024

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Tennessee Technology Access Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.tn.gov/humanservices/ds/ttap.html
Mailing Address:
505 Deaderick St., James K. Polk Building, 15th Floor
City:
Nashville
State:
TN
Zip Code:
37243
Program Email:
TN.TTAP@tn.gov
Phone:
615-313-5183
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Tennessee Department of Human Services
Mailing Address:
505 Deaderick St., James K. Polk Building
City:
Nashville
State:
TN
Zip Code:
37243
Program URL:
http://tn.gov/humanservices

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Kimberly Lilley
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
615-532-4103
E-mail:
kim.lilley@tn.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Kevin Wright
Title:
Assistant Commissioner, Div of Rehab Services
Phone:
615-741-3599
E-mail:
kevin.r.wright@tn.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Kimberly Lilley
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
615-532-4103
E-mail:
kim.lilley@tn.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 752
C. Total 752

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 752

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 134 $87,140 $0 $87,140
Hearing 03 $1,299 $0 $1,299
Speech Communication 15 $848 $0 $848
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 81 $8,454 $0 $8,454
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 265 $131,525 $0 $131,525
Daily Living 411 $92,544 $0 $92,544
Environmental Adaptations 09 $564 $0 $564
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 251 $31,464 $0 $31,464
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 48 $3,824 $0 $3,824
Total 1,217 $357,662 $0 $357,662

D. Anecdote

One grassroots method TTAP uses to acquire items for the reutilization program and connect with those in need involves personal connections on neighborhood social media and through Buy Nothing Facebook groups. The TTAP Executive Director often connects with those in her local neighborhood group to offer resources and reutilized equipment. An individual in the neighborhood posted about Jimmy, an unhoused gentleman in desperate need of a new wheelchair. The TTAP Executive Director was tagged in the post by someone she had not even met as a possible resource to assist. She connected with the original poster to gather details about the need and possible ways to reach Jimmy as he had no phone or specific location. She and others watched for him over the next couple of weeks to pass along a wheelchair, but he was not seen in usual locations. Two weeks passed and she saw a post in a But Nothing group offering durable medical equipment on the opposite side of town on a Sunday afternoon. When she shared about TTAP''s reuse program and offered to pick up the items if not needed directly by someone else, it was requested she go ahead and pick up the items. With the quick unplanned drive across town and back, she pulled into a gas station when the gas light came on. While pumping gas, she notices a man sitting in a wheelchair at the edge of the parking lot. The rear wheels had no tires. A front caster was missing, and the overall condition of the chair was unsteady. After pumping gas, she approached the gentleman providing her first name and asked if he would share his. His name was Jimmy! It turned out to be the exact person she had been seeking. After a conversation and offer of a wheelchair, she made a quick trip to the storage unit and returned with a new wheelchair for Jimmy,

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 119 24 539 682
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 07 05 25 37
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 05 21 27
4. Subtotal 127 34 585 746
5. None of the above 02 00 04 06
6. Subtotal 129 34 589 752
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 129 34 589 752
9. Performance on this measure 98.45% 100% 99.32%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 741 98.54%
Satisfied 10 1.33%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 01 0.13%
Total Surveyed 752
Response rate % 99.87%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 126
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 12
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 23
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 02
Total 163

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 112 30 142
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 01 05 06
Representative of Education 03 01 04
Representative of Employment 00 00 00
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 08 01 09
Representatives of Community Living 02 00 02
Representatives of Technology 00 00 00
Total 126 37 163

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 65 14 79
Hearing 10 00 10
Speech Communication 19 01 20
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 02 00 02
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 06 09 15
Daily Living 22 03 25
Environmental Adaptations 00 00 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 01 01
Computers and Related 34 11 45
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 39 11 50
Total 197 50 247

E. Anecdote

The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center met with Ms. M, a 95-year-old woman in Southeast TN who is hard of hearing. She wanted to try out a device to alert her to various sounds at her home to help maintain her safety and independence. She borrowed a Clarity AlertMaster from the AT center. The Alertmaster flashes a table lamp when someone rings her doorbell or when her alarm goes off. In addition to flashing a light, the AlertMaster vibrates a shaker that can be placed under a seat cushion or a pillow. During the loan period, these visual and tactile alerts helped her know when someone was at her door or when she needed to wake up. She determined by borrowing this system that it would allow her to maintain independence and improve safety in her home, with options to expand to additional alerts and notifications.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 13 11 86 110
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 02 02 11 15
Subtotal 15 13 97 125
Have not made a decision 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 15 13 98 126
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 15 13 98 126
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 98.98%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 01 16 22
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 02 01 07 10
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 02 01 01 04
4. Subtotal 09 03 24 36
5. None of the above 00 00 01 01
6. Subtotal 09 03 25 37
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 09 03 25 37
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 96%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 147 90.18%
Satisfied 10 6.13%
Satisfied somewhat 05 3.07%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.61%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 163
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 403
Hearing 16
Speech Communication 36
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 23
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 06
Daily Living 33
Environmental Adaptations 05
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 50
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 04
Total # of Device Demonstrations 576

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 561 07 568
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 08 200 208
Representatives of Education 04 26 30
Representatives of Employment 01 00 01
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 00 08 08
Representative of Community Living 02 03 05
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Total 576 244 820

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 64
Service Provider 76
Vendor 141
Repair Service 00
Others 12
Total 293

D. Anecdote

A 74-year-old man residing in Southeast TN sustain a stroke, limiting his speech to one-word phrases. As he was then living in an assisted living facility, the speech language pathologist contacted the TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center serving that area to schedule a demonstration of various types of Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) technology that would allow him to express his wants, needs, and other relevant information more effectively. One of the AT Professionals demonstrated various technologies to him, including a GoTalk and several communication apps on an iPad. Through the demonstration, the individual successfully selected a solution he found to be most helpful to meet his communication needs. The AT Professional subsequently provided additional training and a loaner iPad with the chosen app and until his funding source could purchase it for him.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 50 28 440 518
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 01 01 22 24
Subtotal 51 29 462 542
Have not made a decision 04 05 24 33
Subtotal 55 34 486 575
Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
Total 55 34 487 576
Performance on this measure 92.73% 85.29% 94.87%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 714 87.07%
Satisfied 74 9.02%
Satisfied somewhat 29 3.54%
Not at all satisfied 03 0.37%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 820
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 124 25 555 704
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 09 06 32 47
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 03 06 22 31
4. Subtotal 136 37 609 782
5. None of the above 02 00 05 07
6. Subtotal 138 37 614 789
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 138 37 614 789
9. Performance on this measure 96.38% 83.78% 95.6% 95.18%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 63 39 526 628
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 03 33 39
Subtotal 66 42 559 667
Have not made a decision 04 05 25 34
Subtotal 70 47 584 701
Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
Total 70 47 585 702
Performance on this measure 94.29% 89.36% 95.56% 95.01%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 97.81% 95% Met
Response Rate 99.94% 90% Met

Educational/Training Activities

A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Educational/Training Activities by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 260
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 41
Representatives of Education 231
Representatives of Employment 01
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 35
Representatives of Community Living 07
Representatives of Technology 02
Unable to Categorize 78
TOTAL 655

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
564 64 27 655

B. Educational/Training Activity Topics

Educational/Training Activities by Topic
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities Participants
AT Products/Services 414
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 65
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 03
Transition 173
Total 655

C. Description of Educational/Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:

A Tennessee Technology Access Program’s partner assistive technology (AT) center hosted the 9th annual ChatterCamp. During this week-long program is designed for children who are non-verbal and rely on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices to communicate, the AT Professional work on intensive yet fun training opportunities with the participants. Many of the students usually receive limited AAC training, often just a few minutes each week. They are often the only users of these devices in their schools, which can be isolating. However, every participant at ChatterCamp uses an AAC device. This creates an environment where peer interaction and modeling combine to foster significant progress. The camp focuses on helping children make strides toward becoming effective communicators engaged in meaningful conversations as well and expressing their wants, needs, and thoughts. Every step these children take towards effective communication help them prepare to become an agent for their own care while enhancing independence and socialization later in the future. Twenty students participated in ChatterCamp this year. The theme of the camp was "Being a De”Talk”tive," where participants searched for clues and solved puzzles while learning how to use their devices. The AT professionals provided the training in a fun and creative manner leading to more effective use of their devices as the week progressed. The week proved to be an enriching experience for both the children and their families, marking another successful chapter in the camp’s history.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center staff conducted a training at the annual Tennessee Association for Assistive Technology (TAAT) conference. The session “Where to Go from Here: Assistive Technology for Transition” conducted by the AT Professionals addressed audience members such as educators, allied health professionals, families, and individuals with disabilities. The goals of the training were as follows: • Discover post-secondary transition resources • Identify three (3) devices that can be used in an educational or workplace setting • Recognize three (3) applications that can be utilized in an educational or workplace setting The training format included a PowerPoint, question and answer, and group discussions, and the exploration of features and benefits of a variety of assistive technologies relevant to transition. AT relevant to physical, vision, hearing, cognitive, and communication challenges were included in the opportunity. The session provided the participants with knowledge of devices and resources to implement a smooth transition into a post-secondary education or workplace setting.

Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center’s AT Services team conducted an introduction ICT training session for the staff at the Disability Resource Center (DRC) in Knoxville. To establish a foundation for learning, the training began with a general introduction of AT services offered by the AT center to highlight how these resources could be integrated into DRC's operations for improving service delivery for individuals with disabilities. A transition was made to training on core content related to the critical need for accessible media. The AT center team introduced a variety of free tools and resources, which included: • Color contrast checkers to ensure readability for individuals with visual impairments • Reading level analysis tools to improve the accessibility of text content • A demonstration on how to use the accessibility checker built into Microsoft Office to identify and address potential accessibility issues in documents. Key Resources Shared During ICT Training: 5. Accessible Forms: • Adobe's Guide on Creating Accessible Forms: A detailed how-to guide for using Dreamweaver to create accessible forms. • Accessify Quick Form Builder: Combines a form builder and element generator for creating accessible forms quickly. 6. Accessible PDFs: • Adobe's Best Practices for Accessible PDFs: A guide on how to ensure PDFs are accessible to all users. • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Instructions: Step-by-step instructions for creating accessible PDFs. 7. Accessible Tables: • Accessify Table Builder: A tool that simplifies the creation of accessible tables using a guided wizard. 8. Using Plain Language: • PlainLanguage.gov: A resource offering guidelines, examples, and a checklist for writing in plain language. • National Institutes of Health Plain Language Training: Free online training on how to use plain language in documents. 5. Microsoft Accessibility Checker: The training also covered how to use the Microsoft Accessibility Checker to evaluate and improve the accessibility of documents created in Microsoft Office programs. The checker provides recommendations for enhancing accessibility, such as ensuring proper use of headings, alternative text for images, and checking contrast ratios. • Microsoft Support: Accessibility Checker: A comprehensive guide to improving document accessibility using the built-in accessibility tools in Microsoft Office. The ICT training equipped the DRC staff to create accessible content and ensure that their communication materials are inclusive to all individuals. This training exemplifies how technology and knowledge sharing can help bridge accessibility gaps and enhance the effectiveness of services for people with disabilities.

D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 03
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 03
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 49%
Employment 09%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 04%
Community Living 18%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 20%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) and partner assistive technology centers strive to reach new areas related to assistive technology and accessibility. The Miss Tennessee Volunteer pageant is a statewide non-profit organization that is a service-oriented scholarship program designed to empower young women through education and opportunity. The annual pageant is held at Carl Perkins Civic Center in Jackson, TN, where the organization is based. The pageant system includes several categories, including the Iris Princess division for participants 6-10 years old. Participation in this division includes a variety of activities such as a choreographed dance routine and an evening gown competition. The recent pageant included a 10-year-old with Dandy Walker syndrome, which causes visual impairment and hearing impairment. This prompted the pageant coordinator to reach out to the partner AT center for technical assistance related to accessibility of the pageant activities. The AT center’s

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) centers conduct a variety of technical assistance activities in the communities they serve. The AT center in West TN was contacted by Disability Connection Midsouth for assistance in their efforts related to transition. The Disability Connection Midsouth connects individuals with disabilities and their families to training, resources, support, advocacy, and transition services. They support individuals within the community as well as individuals transitioning to employment status within their organization. Collaboration between the organizations allowed the AT center to offer technical assistance regarding accessibility for software used within the organization. Some of the challenges became apparent when the transition to employment at the organization for individuals with vision loss. The AT center’s Certified Assistive Technology Instructional Specialist (CATIS) met with the CEO of the organization and

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. A Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center participated as exhibitors at the Upper Cumberland 2023 Senior and Caregiver Expo in Cookeville, TN. The AT Specialists engaged with approximately 375 individuals including senior citizens, family members, caregivers, and organizations serving senior citizens across Tennessee. Attendees were eager to explore low-tech solutions to make daily life easier at home, such as aluminum reachers and jar openers. A range of low to high tech AT devices displayed at the exhibitor table included but were not limited to a high-contrast large key keyboard, a steady spoon to assist with tremors, an ergonomic computer mouse, a trackball, a sock aid, a Braille device, OrCam MyEye, and Nara 5. Several participants expressed how the AT center's services could benefit themselves or their loved ones. Many also shared personal stories about how assistive devices had already made a positive difference in their lives, whether temporarily or long-term. One notable interaction involved a woman seeking assistance for her uncle who is deaf and had received a Telecommunications Devices Access Programs (TDAP) phone with captions but was unsure how to set it up. Contact information was provided to allow the AT center to follow up with the individual to provide the necessary assistance with the device. Additionally, attendees received handouts providing detailed information about the TTAP program and the range of services offered by the AT center. The event served aa valuable opportunity to raise awareness about assistive technology and connect individuals with the resources available to help improve their daily lives.

2. TTAP conducted the annual Resource Ability Assistive Technology Access Fair in October of 2023 in an effort to enhance exposure to assistive technology to consumers, Vocational Rehabilitation staff, employers, educators, and other members of the community. The event consisted of keynote speaker Sam Seavey of The Blind Life. As an individual with a visual impairment, he shared from his personal experience as well as professional expertise in the world of assistive technology. Sam's background includes collaboration with large corporations regarding accessibility, the establishment of The Blind Life YouTube channel and podcast, and direct services to individuals with vision loss. The approximately 300 participant at the event then had the opportunity to engage with over 25 assistive technology and related services exhibitors. Exhibitors addressed the range of assistive technology areas, including communication, vision, hearing, mobility, and more.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 831 77 908
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 163 46 209
Representative of Education 64 05 69
Representative of Employment 35 02 37
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 43 19 62
Representative of Community Living 22 08 30
Representative of Technology 03 01 04
Unable to Categorize 01 00 01
Total 1,162 158 1,320

Referral Types:

During the reporting period, more individuals have reported connecting with TTAP resources as a result of the state AT website or other AT website in previous years. TTAP has worked to update basic contact on the state website and continues to share the info with partners and organizations to include when applicable with their customers. TTAP has worked with partner AT centers to increase references to their own websites and encourages links to information via their social media resources to help drive more referrals and access to information. The continued networking with local organizations within their respective communities and fostering relationships in another aspect of building referrals. The largest connection for referrals remains previous program participants, a testament to the services provided.

Referral Sources:

Through the most recent reporting period, a significant increase in the I&A referrals occurred as a result of in-person outreach activities. The number increased by over 700% compared to the number of referrals generated through this means in the prior year. While it is not the largest overall resource for referrals, the marked increase indicates the return to more in-person events post-COVID has increased awareness about TTAP programs and it a vital avenue to pursue directly and through partner AT centers. Overall, AT program customer and self-referrals remain the highest source of referrals to TTAP I&A services. This is highly attributed to the customers who have received services directly or for members of their family sharing the information about TTAP.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Yes
Yes
The TN Department of Education (DOE) has a separate grant related to assistive technology known as the AT Project that is operated through a contractor (TN Educational Cooperative) not associated with TTAP and its contractors. During the past year, the grant manager at the TN DOE has changed twice and the lead at the contracted agency has changed. Communication has occurred regarding collaboration and partnership activities, with the initial focus area of interest related to transition. A TTAP contractor collaboratively presented with the TN Educational Cooperative as part of the Transition TN Academies held across the state over the summer. Information regarding TTAP services is provided when the contractor completes presentations. The DOE AT Project focuses primarily on capacity building rather than direct AT demonstrations or assessments. The AT Project does include a loan library. However, the loan library works directly with schools. The DOE AT Project provides information related to TTAP to assist in direct demos or loans for use outside of the school system, working directly with families when contacted.
No additional funding has been provided, as the work completed by the TN DOE contractor was provided directly to the contractor. Efforts continue to be made regarding the partnership, particularly as the direction of their project has settled regarding leadership. Some challenges have occurred in the collaboration with the changing project leadership and the naming of the project. The naming of their grant project, the AT Project, was initially called the TN AT Project. This in combination with their loan program led to confusion across the state and beyond with TTAP based on the name. Information sharing, opportunities to co-present, and participation at area conferences targeting educators are enhancing the partnership and distinguishing the differences between the programs while sharing how they work together. Collaborative efforts will continue with the TN DOE AT Project as the grant continues over the next couple of years, with increased effort to enhance partnership activities through conversations at an agency level and with the assistance of the DHS Public Information & Legislative Office to enhance the opportunities.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education, Employment, Transition (school to work or congregate care to community),

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan, Demo, Reuse, Training, Information & Assistance, Public Awareness,

Yes
Yes
TTAP and the assistive technology (AT) services provided by Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) are tightly aligned for collaboration as both programs fall under the TN Department of Human Services – Divisional of Rehabilitation Services. The TTAP Executive Director additional help manage the VR AT services contract. Funding does not crossover between VR and TTAP services, but the closeness of programs does benefit customers with the access to AT devices and a breadth of expertise.
This ongoing relationship provides greater access to AT through the libraries of partners along with a wide array of expertise available from the providers spread across the state. With the statewide VR AT provider also being a TTAP partner center, the number of staff available to provide services is greater due to the funding available from both sources. This benefits both programs. The connection between the programs facilitates more streamlined access to loans and reutilized equipment to support VR customers while they are in training, waiting on equipment, or acquiring AT that does not fall under the parameters of VR purchases when it is available. No change is anticipated in the role between VR and TTAP.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education, Employment, Transition (school to work or congregate care to community),

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan, Demo, Reuse, Training, Information & Assistance,

Yes
Yes
During this reporting period, the creation of a new department occurred designed to serve the aging and disability communities. The departments formerly known as the TN Department of Developmental Disabilities and the TN Commission on Aging & Disability have joined as a new agency known at the TN Department of Disability & Aging (DDA). As this is a new arrangement that was still settling with official implementation beginning July of 2024, connections are established but specific initiatives are not in place.
The TTAP Executive Director presented about AT and services at the annual Enabling Technology Summit coordinated by DIDD, prior to the official transition to the combined agency. The TTAP Executive Director co-chairs the Technology & Innovation Workgroup on the Employment 1st taskforce, which is coordinated through DDA. An Enabling Technology (ET) program was established under DIDD before becoming DDA and expanding to serve the aging population. With the overlap of AT and ET, the specific path of future collaboration is not yet known as the new agency refines its service delivery. TTAP has historically assisted individuals served under DDA for activities such as reutilization, often contacted directly through providers serving their customers and will continue to do so.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Employment, Health, Aging,

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan, Demo, Reuse, Training, Information & Assistance, Public Awareness,

No
TennCare is the Medicaid implementing agency. Contacts and relationships have been established with many of the providers of the services for Medicaid recipients. TTAP has conducted with outreach to those who may work Medicaid recipients to increase awareness of services, such as participation in Adult Protective Services, Childcare, and Child Support educational opportunities, participation in the Statewide Coordinated Community Response (CCR), and other projects with the TN Department of Healt

Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities 2

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The TTAP Executive Director collaborates with the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. The TTAP Executive Director attends lab sections of the designated course to share about different types of toy adaptations and the important role access to toys plays in the lives of individuals with disabilities. The access to adapted toys helps children improve motor skills, facilitates opportunities for choice making, fosters opportunities for interactions with peers, serves as a method to help with language and communication development, and develop skills for potential long term use of switch-adapted assistive technology to control other aspects of their environment. These sessions serve as the introduction to the lab activities and instructions by the professor on the process of making a switch and adapting toys. The students learn technical engineering skills such as soldering and technical writing skills through their accompanying reports. Funding to cover the supplies and adapted toys is provided through the university.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

As a result of this collaboration, the custom switches and toys are donated to TTAP. The items are used to expand items available in the demo, loan and reutilization programs. More than 80 switches and 80 toys were donated during the reporting time period. The students participating gained knowledge about disabilities and the various applications in engineering that can be explored to enhance lives of individuals with disabilities. This offers a new perspective as they continue their education and future careers, with the hope accessibility and inclusive design will be integrated in their work. Stemming from the series of labs, over 5 students who remained local over the summer volunteered as interns assisting with the local AT center partner with toy and other AT activities. This is a recurring event each semester, with the number of toys and switches received varying each semester based on the number of students and lab sections offered.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Recreation / Leisure;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse;

A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center serving Southeast TN began a collaborative partnership with McCallie School, a private boarding school in their area. Several student volunteers and adult chaperones worked with AT Professional and staff us twice per week. No additional TTAP funds were necessary for the initiative. The volunteer hours benefited the AT center with completed tasks.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The students helped with many smaller projects at the center that staff simply had not had time to address. They fixed several video magnifiers that were in for repair, repaired a table in their loan library, and helped get many of our DIY video magnifiers setup to be available for distribution. This collaboration increased the availability of AT available in the loan and reutilization programs. The additional items repaired or completed extended the reach of AT to additional individuals in need of the equipment. Incorporating students and teachers into these activities raised awareness about disabilities and AT, which in turn may bring more resources and equipment into the AT center through community connections. The plan is to continue the relationship with the school for future projects which may involve different students.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Community Participation and Integration; Aging;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Reuse;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

The ARPA funds received an extension. The contracted position to fill this role was delayed and some unexpected time off was encountered. Additional activities occurred after September 30, 2024, and will continue until funds are expended.

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY24 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.