Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 752 |
C. Total | 752 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 752 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 134 | $87,140 | $0 | $87,140 |
Hearing | 03 | $1,299 | $0 | $1,299 |
Speech Communication | 15 | $848 | $0 | $848 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 81 | $8,454 | $0 | $8,454 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 265 | $131,525 | $0 | $131,525 |
Daily Living | 411 | $92,544 | $0 | $92,544 |
Environmental Adaptations | 09 | $564 | $0 | $564 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 251 | $31,464 | $0 | $31,464 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 48 | $3,824 | $0 | $3,824 |
Total | 1,217 | $357,662 | $0 | $357,662 |
One grassroots method TTAP uses to acquire items for the reutilization program and connect with those in need involves personal connections on neighborhood social media and through Buy Nothing Facebook groups. The TTAP Executive Director often connects with those in her local neighborhood group to offer resources and reutilized equipment. An individual in the neighborhood posted about Jimmy, an unhoused gentleman in desperate need of a new wheelchair. The TTAP Executive Director was tagged in the post by someone she had not even met as a possible resource to assist. She connected with the original poster to gather details about the need and possible ways to reach Jimmy as he had no phone or specific location. She and others watched for him over the next couple of weeks to pass along a wheelchair, but he was not seen in usual locations. Two weeks passed and she saw a post in a But Nothing group offering durable medical equipment on the opposite side of town on a Sunday afternoon. When she shared about TTAP''s reuse program and offered to pick up the items if not needed directly by someone else, it was requested she go ahead and pick up the items. With the quick unplanned drive across town and back, she pulled into a gas station when the gas light came on. While pumping gas, she notices a man sitting in a wheelchair at the edge of the parking lot. The rear wheels had no tires. A front caster was missing, and the overall condition of the chair was unsteady. After pumping gas, she approached the gentleman providing her first name and asked if he would share his. His name was Jimmy! It turned out to be the exact person she had been seeking. After a conversation and offer of a wheelchair, she made a quick trip to the storage unit and returned with a new wheelchair for Jimmy,
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 119 | 24 | 539 | 682 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 07 | 05 | 25 | 37 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 05 | 21 | 27 |
4. Subtotal | 127 | 34 | 585 | 746 |
5. None of the above | 02 | 00 | 04 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 129 | 34 | 589 | 752 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 129 | 34 | 589 | 752 |
9. Performance on this measure | 98.45% | 100% | 99.32% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 741 | 98.54% |
Satisfied | 10 | 1.33% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.13% |
Total Surveyed | 752 | |
Response rate % | 99.87% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 126 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 12 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 23 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 02 |
Total | 163 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 112 | 30 | 142 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 01 | 05 | 06 |
Representative of Education | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 08 | 01 | 09 |
Representatives of Community Living | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 126 | 37 | 163 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 65 | 14 | 79 |
Hearing | 10 | 00 | 10 |
Speech Communication | 19 | 01 | 20 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 | 09 | 15 |
Daily Living | 22 | 03 | 25 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Computers and Related | 34 | 11 | 45 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 39 | 11 | 50 |
Total | 197 | 50 | 247 |
The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center met with Ms. M, a 95-year-old woman in Southeast TN who is hard of hearing. She wanted to try out a device to alert her to various sounds at her home to help maintain her safety and independence. She borrowed a Clarity AlertMaster from the AT center. The Alertmaster flashes a table lamp when someone rings her doorbell or when her alarm goes off. In addition to flashing a light, the AlertMaster vibrates a shaker that can be placed under a seat cushion or a pillow. During the loan period, these visual and tactile alerts helped her know when someone was at her door or when she needed to wake up. She determined by borrowing this system that it would allow her to maintain independence and improve safety in her home, with options to expand to additional alerts and notifications.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 13 | 11 | 86 | 110 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 02 | 11 | 15 |
Subtotal | 15 | 13 | 97 | 125 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 15 | 13 | 98 | 126 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 15 | 13 | 98 | 126 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 98.98% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 01 | 16 | 22 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 01 | 07 | 10 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 01 | 01 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 09 | 03 | 24 | 36 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 09 | 03 | 25 | 37 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 09 | 03 | 25 | 37 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 96% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 147 | 90.18% |
Satisfied | 10 | 6.13% |
Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 3.07% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.61% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 163 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 403 |
Hearing | 16 |
Speech Communication | 36 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 23 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 |
Daily Living | 33 |
Environmental Adaptations | 05 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 50 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 576 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 561 | 07 | 568 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 08 | 200 | 208 |
Representatives of Education | 04 | 26 | 30 |
Representatives of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00 | 08 | 08 |
Representative of Community Living | 02 | 03 | 05 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 576 | 244 | 820 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 64 |
Service Provider | 76 |
Vendor | 141 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 12 |
Total | 293 |
A 74-year-old man residing in Southeast TN sustain a stroke, limiting his speech to one-word phrases. As he was then living in an assisted living facility, the speech language pathologist contacted the TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center serving that area to schedule a demonstration of various types of Alternative and Augmentative Communication (AAC) technology that would allow him to express his wants, needs, and other relevant information more effectively. One of the AT Professionals demonstrated various technologies to him, including a GoTalk and several communication apps on an iPad. Through the demonstration, the individual successfully selected a solution he found to be most helpful to meet his communication needs. The AT Professional subsequently provided additional training and a loaner iPad with the chosen app and until his funding source could purchase it for him.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 50 | 28 | 440 | 518 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 01 | 22 | 24 |
Subtotal | 51 | 29 | 462 | 542 |
Have not made a decision | 04 | 05 | 24 | 33 |
Subtotal | 55 | 34 | 486 | 575 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 55 | 34 | 487 | 576 |
Performance on this measure | 92.73% | 85.29% | 94.87% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 714 | 87.07% |
Satisfied | 74 | 9.02% |
Satisfied somewhat | 29 | 3.54% |
Not at all satisfied | 03 | 0.37% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 820 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 124 | 25 | 555 | 704 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 09 | 06 | 32 | 47 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 03 | 06 | 22 | 31 |
4. Subtotal | 136 | 37 | 609 | 782 |
5. None of the above | 02 | 00 | 05 | 07 |
6. Subtotal | 138 | 37 | 614 | 789 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 138 | 37 | 614 | 789 |
9. Performance on this measure | 96.38% | 83.78% | 95.6% | 95.18% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 63 | 39 | 526 | 628 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 03 | 33 | 39 |
Subtotal | 66 | 42 | 559 | 667 |
Have not made a decision | 04 | 05 | 25 | 34 |
Subtotal | 70 | 47 | 584 | 701 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 70 | 47 | 585 | 702 |
Performance on this measure | 94.29% | 89.36% | 95.56% | 95.01% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 97.81% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.94% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 260 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 41 |
Representatives of Education | 231 |
Representatives of Employment | 01 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 35 |
Representatives of Community Living | 07 |
Representatives of Technology | 02 |
Unable to Categorize | 78 |
TOTAL | 655 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
564 | 64 | 27 | 655 |
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 414 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 65 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 03 |
Transition | 173 |
Total | 655 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
A Tennessee Technology Access Program’s partner assistive technology (AT) center hosted the 9th annual ChatterCamp. During this week-long program is designed for children who are non-verbal and rely on Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices to communicate, the AT Professional work on intensive yet fun training opportunities with the participants. Many of the students usually receive limited AAC training, often just a few minutes each week. They are often the only users of these devices in their schools, which can be isolating. However, every participant at ChatterCamp uses an AAC device. This creates an environment where peer interaction and modeling combine to foster significant progress. The camp focuses on helping children make strides toward becoming effective communicators engaged in meaningful conversations as well and expressing their wants, needs, and thoughts. Every step these children take towards effective communication help them prepare to become an agent for their own care while enhancing independence and socialization later in the future. Twenty students participated in ChatterCamp this year. The theme of the camp was "Being a De”Talk”tive," where participants searched for clues and solved puzzles while learning how to use their devices. The AT professionals provided the training in a fun and creative manner leading to more effective use of their devices as the week progressed. The week proved to be an enriching experience for both the children and their families, marking another successful chapter in the camp’s history.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center staff conducted a training at the annual Tennessee Association for Assistive Technology (TAAT) conference. The session “Where to Go from Here: Assistive Technology for Transition” conducted by the AT Professionals addressed audience members such as educators, allied health professionals, families, and individuals with disabilities. The goals of the training were as follows: • Discover post-secondary transition resources • Identify three (3) devices that can be used in an educational or workplace setting • Recognize three (3) applications that can be utilized in an educational or workplace setting The training format included a PowerPoint, question and answer, and group discussions, and the exploration of features and benefits of a variety of assistive technologies relevant to transition. AT relevant to physical, vision, hearing, cognitive, and communication challenges were included in the opportunity. The session provided the participants with knowledge of devices and resources to implement a smooth transition into a post-secondary education or workplace setting.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center’s AT Services team conducted an introduction ICT training session for the staff at the Disability Resource Center (DRC) in Knoxville. To establish a foundation for learning, the training began with a general introduction of AT services offered by the AT center to highlight how these resources could be integrated into DRC's operations for improving service delivery for individuals with disabilities. A transition was made to training on core content related to the critical need for accessible media. The AT center team introduced a variety of free tools and resources, which included: • Color contrast checkers to ensure readability for individuals with visual impairments • Reading level analysis tools to improve the accessibility of text content • A demonstration on how to use the accessibility checker built into Microsoft Office to identify and address potential accessibility issues in documents. Key Resources Shared During ICT Training: 5. Accessible Forms: • Adobe's Guide on Creating Accessible Forms: A detailed how-to guide for using Dreamweaver to create accessible forms. • Accessify Quick Form Builder: Combines a form builder and element generator for creating accessible forms quickly. 6. Accessible PDFs: • Adobe's Best Practices for Accessible PDFs: A guide on how to ensure PDFs are accessible to all users. • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Instructions: Step-by-step instructions for creating accessible PDFs. 7. Accessible Tables: • Accessify Table Builder: A tool that simplifies the creation of accessible tables using a guided wizard. 8. Using Plain Language: • PlainLanguage.gov: A resource offering guidelines, examples, and a checklist for writing in plain language. • National Institutes of Health Plain Language Training: Free online training on how to use plain language in documents. 5. Microsoft Accessibility Checker: The training also covered how to use the Microsoft Accessibility Checker to evaluate and improve the accessibility of documents created in Microsoft Office programs. The checker provides recommendations for enhancing accessibility, such as ensuring proper use of headings, alternative text for images, and checking contrast ratios. • Microsoft Support: Accessibility Checker: A comprehensive guide to improving document accessibility using the built-in accessibility tools in Microsoft Office. The ICT training equipped the DRC staff to create accessible content and ensure that their communication materials are inclusive to all individuals. This training exemplifies how technology and knowledge sharing can help bridge accessibility gaps and enhance the effectiveness of services for people with disabilities.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 03 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 03 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 49% |
---|---|
Employment | 09% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 04% |
Community Living | 18% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 20% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) and partner assistive technology centers strive to reach new areas related to assistive technology and accessibility. The Miss Tennessee Volunteer pageant is a statewide non-profit organization that is a service-oriented scholarship program designed to empower young women through education and opportunity. The annual pageant is held at Carl Perkins Civic Center in Jackson, TN, where the organization is based. The pageant system includes several categories, including the Iris Princess division for participants 6-10 years old. Participation in this division includes a variety of activities such as a choreographed dance routine and an evening gown competition. The recent pageant included a 10-year-old with Dandy Walker syndrome, which causes visual impairment and hearing impairment. This prompted the pageant coordinator to reach out to the partner AT center for technical assistance related to accessibility of the pageant activities. The AT center’s
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) centers conduct a variety of technical assistance activities in the communities they serve. The AT center in West TN was contacted by Disability Connection Midsouth for assistance in their efforts related to transition. The Disability Connection Midsouth connects individuals with disabilities and their families to training, resources, support, advocacy, and transition services. They support individuals within the community as well as individuals transitioning to employment status within their organization. Collaboration between the organizations allowed the AT center to offer technical assistance regarding accessibility for software used within the organization. Some of the challenges became apparent when the transition to employment at the organization for individuals with vision loss. The AT center’s Certified Assistive Technology Instructional Specialist (CATIS) met with the CEO of the organization and
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. A Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center participated as exhibitors at the Upper Cumberland 2023 Senior and Caregiver Expo in Cookeville, TN. The AT Specialists engaged with approximately 375 individuals including senior citizens, family members, caregivers, and organizations serving senior citizens across Tennessee. Attendees were eager to explore low-tech solutions to make daily life easier at home, such as aluminum reachers and jar openers. A range of low to high tech AT devices displayed at the exhibitor table included but were not limited to a high-contrast large key keyboard, a steady spoon to assist with tremors, an ergonomic computer mouse, a trackball, a sock aid, a Braille device, OrCam MyEye, and Nara 5. Several participants expressed how the AT center's services could benefit themselves or their loved ones. Many also shared personal stories about how assistive devices had already made a positive difference in their lives, whether temporarily or long-term. One notable interaction involved a woman seeking assistance for her uncle who is deaf and had received a Telecommunications Devices Access Programs (TDAP) phone with captions but was unsure how to set it up. Contact information was provided to allow the AT center to follow up with the individual to provide the necessary assistance with the device. Additionally, attendees received handouts providing detailed information about the TTAP program and the range of services offered by the AT center. The event served aa valuable opportunity to raise awareness about assistive technology and connect individuals with the resources available to help improve their daily lives.
2. TTAP conducted the annual Resource Ability Assistive Technology Access Fair in October of 2023 in an effort to enhance exposure to assistive technology to consumers, Vocational Rehabilitation staff, employers, educators, and other members of the community. The event consisted of keynote speaker Sam Seavey of The Blind Life. As an individual with a visual impairment, he shared from his personal experience as well as professional expertise in the world of assistive technology. Sam's background includes collaboration with large corporations regarding accessibility, the establishment of The Blind Life YouTube channel and podcast, and direct services to individuals with vision loss. The approximately 300 participant at the event then had the opportunity to engage with over 25 assistive technology and related services exhibitors. Exhibitors addressed the range of assistive technology areas, including communication, vision, hearing, mobility, and more.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 831 | 77 | 908 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 163 | 46 | 209 |
Representative of Education | 64 | 05 | 69 |
Representative of Employment | 35 | 02 | 37 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 43 | 19 | 62 |
Representative of Community Living | 22 | 08 | 30 |
Representative of Technology | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 1,162 | 158 | 1,320 |
During the reporting period, more individuals have reported connecting with TTAP resources as a result of the state AT website or other AT website in previous years. TTAP has worked to update basic contact on the state website and continues to share the info with partners and organizations to include when applicable with their customers. TTAP has worked with partner AT centers to increase references to their own websites and encourages links to information via their social media resources to help drive more referrals and access to information. The continued networking with local organizations within their respective communities and fostering relationships in another aspect of building referrals. The largest connection for referrals remains previous program participants, a testament to the services provided.
Through the most recent reporting period, a significant increase in the I&A referrals occurred as a result of in-person outreach activities. The number increased by over 700% compared to the number of referrals generated through this means in the prior year. While it is not the largest overall resource for referrals, the marked increase indicates the return to more in-person events post-COVID has increased awareness about TTAP programs and it a vital avenue to pursue directly and through partner AT centers. Overall, AT program customer and self-referrals remain the highest source of referrals to TTAP I&A services. This is highly attributed to the customers who have received services directly or for members of their family sharing the information about TTAP.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The TTAP Executive Director collaborates with the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. The TTAP Executive Director attends lab sections of the designated course to share about different types of toy adaptations and the important role access to toys plays in the lives of individuals with disabilities. The access to adapted toys helps children improve motor skills, facilitates opportunities for choice making, fosters opportunities for interactions with peers, serves as a method to help with language and communication development, and develop skills for potential long term use of switch-adapted assistive technology to control other aspects of their environment. These sessions serve as the introduction to the lab activities and instructions by the professor on the process of making a switch and adapting toys. The students learn technical engineering skills such as soldering and technical writing skills through their accompanying reports. Funding to cover the supplies and adapted toys is provided through the university.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
As a result of this collaboration, the custom switches and toys are donated to TTAP. The items are used to expand items available in the demo, loan and reutilization programs. More than 80 switches and 80 toys were donated during the reporting time period. The students participating gained knowledge about disabilities and the various applications in engineering that can be explored to enhance lives of individuals with disabilities. This offers a new perspective as they continue their education and future careers, with the hope accessibility and inclusive design will be integrated in their work. Stemming from the series of labs, over 5 students who remained local over the summer volunteered as interns assisting with the local AT center partner with toy and other AT activities. This is a recurring event each semester, with the number of toys and switches received varying each semester based on the number of students and lab sections offered.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Recreation / Leisure;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The TN Technology Access Program (TTAP) partner assistive technology (AT) center serving Southeast TN began a collaborative partnership with McCallie School, a private boarding school in their area. Several student volunteers and adult chaperones worked with AT Professional and staff us twice per week. No additional TTAP funds were necessary for the initiative. The volunteer hours benefited the AT center with completed tasks.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The students helped with many smaller projects at the center that staff simply had not had time to address. They fixed several video magnifiers that were in for repair, repaired a table in their loan library, and helped get many of our DIY video magnifiers setup to be available for distribution. This collaboration increased the availability of AT available in the loan and reutilization programs. The additional items repaired or completed extended the reach of AT to additional individuals in need of the equipment. Incorporating students and teachers into these activities raised awareness about disabilities and AT, which in turn may bring more resources and equipment into the AT center through community connections. The plan is to continue the relationship with the school for future projects which may involve different students.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Reuse;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The ARPA funds received an extension. The contracted position to fill this role was delayed and some unexpected time off was encountered. Additional activities occurred after September 30, 2024, and will continue until funds are expended.