Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Weber, Carol
Title:
Assistive Technology Branch Manager
Phone:
502-764-2709
E-mail:
carols.weber@ky.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Weber, Carol
Title:
Assistive Technology Branch Manager
Phone:
502-764-2709
E-mail:
carols.weber@ky.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:
Certifying Representative
Name (last, first):
McNabb, Cora
Title:
Executive Director, Office of Vocational Rehab.
Phone:
800.372.7172
E-mail:
Cora.McNabb@ky.gov
State Financing
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing?
Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program?
Yes
Loan Applications
Area of Residence
Total
Metro RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made
03
60
63
Approved Not made
01
02
03
Rejected
03
14
17
Total
07
76
83
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income:
$11,502
Highest Income:
$110,400
Average Income
Sum of Incomes
Loans Made
Average Annual Income
$3,171,150
63
$50,336
Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges
Total
$15,000 or Less
$15,001- $30,000
$30,001- $45,000
$45,001- $60,000
$60,001- $75,000
$75,001 or More
Number of Loans
02
12
12
10
07
20
63
Percentage of Loans
3.17%
19.05%
19.05%
15.87%
11.11%
31.75%
100%
3. Loan Type
Loan Type
Type of Loan
Number of Loans
Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans
63
100%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee
00
0%
With interest buy-down only
00
0%
With loan guarantee only
00
0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee
00
0%
Total
63
100%
Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan
Number of Loans
Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans
63
$312,933
Partnership Loans
00
$0
Total
63
$312,933
4. Interest Rates
Interest Rates
Lowest
0%
Highest
0%
Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates
Number of Loans Made
Average Interest Rate
00
63
0%
Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate
Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0%
63
2.1% to 4.0%
00
4.1% to 6.0%
00
6.1% to 8.0%
00
8.1% - 10.0%
00
10.1%-12.0%
00
12.1%-14.0%
00
14.1% +
00
Total
63
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT
Number of Devices Financed
Dollar Value of Loans
Vision
00
$0
Hearing
60
$300,042
Speech communication
00
$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental
00
$0
Mobility, seating and positioning
00
$0
Daily living
02
$6,097
Environmental adaptations
01
$6,794
Vehicle modification and transportation
00
$0
Computers and related
00
$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure
00
$0
Total
63
$312,933
6. Defaults
Defaults
Number Loans in default
00
Net loss for loans in default
$0
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan?
2
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?
Other: Makerspace Program
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
County of Residence
Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)
0
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)
20
C. Total Served
20
Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure
0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures
20
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service
Number of Devices Funded
Value of AT Provided
Vision
0
$0
Hearing
0
$0
Speech communication
0
$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental
0
$0
Mobility, seating and positioning
0
$0
Daily living
20
$121
Environmental adaptations
0
$0
Vehicle modification and transportation
0
$0
Computers and related
0
$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure
0
$0
Total
20
$121
Activity 2
How would you describe this state financing activity?
Other: Statewide Hearing Aid Reuse Program
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
County of Residence
Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)
3
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)
0
C. Total Served
3
Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure
0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures
3
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service
Number of Devices Funded
Value of AT Provided
Vision
0
$0
Hearing
3
$559
Speech communication
0
$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental
0
$0
Mobility, seating and positioning
0
$0
Daily living
0
$0
Environmental adaptations
0
$0
Vehicle modification and transportation
0
$0
Computers and related
0
$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure
0
$0
Total
3
$559
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan?
0
D. Anecdote
Joan is a 76-year-old individual who needed hearing aids. Insurance provided no coverage for the hearing aids. Joan was needing the hearing aids to hear conversations clearly and was wanting to no longer have to ask individuals to repeat themselves or agreeing to things that she did not understand. Originally, she was offered a program that offered a loan but upon reviewing the program, Joan did not like the terms and conditions. After a change in hearing aid vendors, many pointed questions and correspondence with us, she applied for the hearing aid with us. While Joan was still a bit skeptical of the program, she talked with other participants and felt comfortable in her financing decision. Joan has had her hearing aids about seven months and is enjoying participating in life again without the stressors that her hearing loss caused.
E. Performance Measures
Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.
00
01
22
23
2. AT was only available through the AT program.
00
00
00
00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.
00
00
00
00
4. Subtotal
00
01
22
23
5. None of the above
00
00
00
00
6. Subtotal
00
01
22
23
7. Nonrespondent
01
32
30
63
8. Total
01
33
52
86
9. Performance on this measure
0%
3.03%
42.31%
F. Customer Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services
Number of Customers
Percent
Highly satisfied
03
3.49%
Satisfied
20
23.26%
Satisfied somewhat
00
0%
Not at all satisfied
00
0%
Nonrespondent
63
73.26%
Total Surveyed
86
Response rate %
26.74%
G. Notes:
For the loans, satisfaction surveys were sent anonymously to recipients in multiple states. It is not possible to know which ones are relevant specific to Kentucky. This will be changed for future reporting years.
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
Activity
Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange
01
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan
1,018
C. Total
1,019
Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients.
00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures
1,019
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
Device Exchange
Type of AT Device
Number of Devices Exchanged
Total Estimated Current Purchase Price
Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged
Savings to Consumers
Vision
00
$0
$0
$0
Hearing
00
$0
$0
$0
Speech Communication
00
$0
$0
$0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental
00
$0
$0
$0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning
00
$0
$0
$0
Daily Living
00
$0
$0
$0
Environmental Adaptations
00
$0
$0
$0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation
01
$1,330
$0
$1,330
Computers and Related
00
$0
$0
$0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure
00
$0
$0
$0
Total
01
$1,330
$0
$1,330
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device
Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired
Total Estimated Current Purchase Price
Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold
Savings to Consumers
Vision
05
$5,650
$0
$5,650
Hearing
05
$345
$0
$345
Speech Communication
04
$600
$0
$600
Learning, Cognition and Developmental
06
$837
$0
$837
Mobility, Seating and Positioning
858
$648,249
$0
$648,249
Daily Living
982
$109,951
$224
$109,727
Environmental Adaptations
14
$1,798
$0
$1,798
Vehicle Modification & Transportation
00
$0
$0
$0
Computers and Related
05
$1,577
$0
$1,577
Recreation, Sports and Leisure
15
$1,340
$0
$1,340
Total
1,894
$770,347
$224
$770,123
D. Anecdote
In April 2023, we were able assist a therapist with Woodford County Schools in obtaining a pediatric wheelchair for a student. The child’s family home was destroyed by a fire, and they lost all of their possessions, including the child’s wheelchair. Not long after the fire, the therapist reached out to us for a pediatric wheelchair with a 10”-12” seat. As, it often happens around here, one was donated by a family whose child had outgrown it, very soon after her request. The chair was a perfect fit for the child and now she is able to participate in activities at school while waiting for a replacement chair.
E. Performance Measures
Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.
31
03
955
989
2. AT was only available through the AT program.
02
01
11
14
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.
00
01
13
14
4. Subtotal
33
05
979
1,017
5. None of the above
00
00
02
02
6. Subtotal
33
05
981
1,019
7. Nonrespondent
00
00
00
00
8. Total
33
05
981
1,019
9. Performance on this measure
100%
100%
99.8%
F. Customer Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services
Number of Customers
Percent
Highly satisfied
1,017
99.8%
Satisfied
02
0.2%
Satisfied somewhat
00
0%
Not at all satisfied
00
0%
Nonrespondent
00
0%
Total Surveyed
1,019
Response rate %
100%
G. Notes:
Our Assistive Technology Resource Center in Louisville, KY, closed on 9/30/2023. We were unable to replace the Center until 7/1/2024. While we did work with other agencies, such as Supplies Over Seas (SOS) to ensure resources were available to individuals with disabilities, we were unable to provide them at the same level.
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan
Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation)
531
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding
28
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation
212
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity
28
Total
799
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity
Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making
All other Purposes
Total
Individuals with Disabilities
25
56
81
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives
266
122
388
Representative of Education
37
16
53
Representative of Employment
02
03
05
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation
193
58
251
Representatives of Community Living
05
09
14
Representatives of Technology
03
04
07
Total
531
268
799
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days
30
D. Types of Devices Loaned
Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device
Number of Devices
Desicion-making
All other Purposes
Total
Vision
20
11
31
Hearing
02
13
15
Speech Communication
127
17
144
Learning, Cognition and Developmental
28
08
36
Mobility, Seating and Positioning
180
139
319
Daily Living
64
96
160
Environmental Adaptations
05
00
05
Vehicle Modification and Transportation
04
01
05
Computers and Related
46
31
77
Recreation, Sports and Leisure
385
150
535
Total
861
466
1,327
E. Anecdote
The Easterseals Redwood ATRC was visited by a woman whose mother was having difficulty reading printed materials due to deteriorating vision. She reported that her mother did not want to have other individuals read her mail to her and she was frustrated that she couldn't read recipes that she would like to cook. We showed the woman how to use the Lyriq and she thought that this might be a solution for her mother's needs so she borrowed it for 30 days to ensure that it would work for her. After the end of the 30 days, it was confirmed that the Lyriq was a good solution for her mother and they were connected with a vision AT vendor and the Lion's Club to secure funding for the device.
F. Access Performance Measures
Access Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs
69
00
318
387
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs
57
00
69
126
Subtotal
126
00
387
513
Have not made a decision
06
00
12
18
Subtotal
132
00
399
531
Nonrespondent
00
00
00
00
Total
132
00
399
531
Performance on this measure
95.45%
NaN%
96.99%
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
Acquisition Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.
28
02
198
228
2. AT was only available through the AT program.
04
01
30
35
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.
02
01
02
05
4. Subtotal
34
04
230
268
5. None of the above
00
00
00
00
6. Subtotal
34
04
230
268
7. Nonrespondent
00
00
00
00
8. Total
34
04
230
268
9. Performance on this measure
100%
100%
100%
H. Customer Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services
Number of Customers
Percent
Highly satisfied
789
98.75%
Satisfied
09
1.13%
Satisfied somewhat
01
0.13%
Not at all satisfied
00
0%
Nonrespondent
00
0%
Total Surveyed
799
Response rate %
100%
I. Notes:
The Assistive Technology Resource Center that closed in Louisville did a significant number of loans to Kentucky Early Intervention System (KEIS) families. The KATS Network was able to provide these services through other centers, but there is still a decrease overall in loans made. Often times, KEIS loans are made for a short period for a child whose skills grow. The loan is returned and the next level device is borrowed. In this way, while coded as a short-term intervention, the parents are essentially making the decision that the loaned device which met needs at the start of the loan no longer meets the needs by the end of the loan period and borrowing a different device. Essentially, due to a skills gain by the child, the parent and professional are continuously upgrading the equipment borrowed.
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
Type of AT Device / Service
Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision
00
Hearing
00
Speech Communication
14
Learning, Cognition and Developmental
02
Mobility, Seating and Positioning
05
Daily Living
02
Environmental Adaptations
00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation
00
Computers and Related
02
Recreation, Sports and Leisure
01
Total # of Device Demonstrations
26
B. Types of Participants
Type of Participant
Decision-Makers
Other Participants
Total
Individuals with Disabilities
02
20
22
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives
16
21
37
Representatives of Education
00
00
00
Representatives of Employment
00
00
00
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
08
19
27
Representative of Community Living
00
01
01
Representative of Technology
00
07
07
Total
26
68
94
C. Number of Referrals
Referrals
Type of Entity
Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program)
04
Service Provider
08
Vendor
10
Repair Service
00
Others
00
Total
22
D. Anecdote
Wendell Foster SLP/ATP conducted an AAC evaluation for a 6-year old child from Christian County. Trialed several dynamic display devices. The PRiO device had advanced vocabulary, which was not a suitable option. Trialed I-110 with TD Snap. Mom liked that the grid sizes would grow and follow the child as her abilities progressed. She liked the feature of hiding buttons and the ability to personalize with real pictures to make the device relatable. She liked the word find feature to locate the paths of vocabulary, and the layout of the buttons on the Motor Plan 30 page set. Trialed NovaChat 10. Mom was shown the vocabulary options for the MyQuickChat 12, MultiChat 15, WordPower 25 and WordPower 42. Mom felt the MyQuickChat 12 would be too basic and the MultiChat would not provide as a robust vocabulary for the near future. Mom liked the keyguard and agreed that the MultiChat 15 and WordPower 25 would be good starting points for a one-month trial.
E. Performance Measures
Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs
04
00
09
13
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs
01
00
02
03
Subtotal
05
00
11
16
Have not made a decision
00
00
10
10
Subtotal
05
00
21
26
Nonrespondent
00
00
00
00
Total
05
00
21
26
Performance on this measure
100%
NaN%
52.38%
F. Customer Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services
Number of Customers
Percent
Highly satisfied
87
92.55%
Satisfied
00
0%
Satisfied somewhat
00
0%
Not at all satisfied
00
0%
Nonrespondent
07
7.45%
Total
94
Response rate %
92.55%
G. Notes:
The Assistive Technology Resource Center in Louisville, KY, closed in September of 2023. This center did a significant number of demonstrations in the past. In the previous fiscal year, the closed center had done 82 demonstrations.
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
Acquisition Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program.
59
06
1,175
1,240
2. AT was only available through the AT program.
06
02
41
49
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long.
02
02
15
19
4. Subtotal
67
10
1,231
1,308
5. None of the above
00
00
02
02
6. Subtotal
67
10
1,233
1,310
7. Nonrespondent
01
32
30
63
8. Total
68
42
1,263
1,373
9. Performance on this measure
95.59%
19.05%
96.28%
93.88%
ACL Performance Measure
85%
Met/Not Met
Met
Overall Access Performance Measure
Access Performance Measures
Response
Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed
Total
Education
Employment
Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs
73
00
327
400
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs
58
00
71
129
Subtotal
131
00
398
529
Have not made a decision
06
00
22
28
Subtotal
137
00
420
557
Nonrespondent
00
00
00
00
Total
137
00
420
557
Performance on this measure
95.62%
NaN%
94.76%
94.97%
ACL Performance Measure
90%
Met/Not Met
Met
Overall Satisfaction Rating
Customer Rating of Services
Percent
ACL Target
Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied
99.95%
95%
Met
Response Rate
96.50%
90%
Met
Educational/Training Activities
A. Educational/Training Activity Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
Educational/Training Activities by Participant Type
Type of Participant
Number
Individuals with Disabilities
35
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives
01
Representatives of Education
66
Representatives of Employment
263
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation
282
Representatives of Community Living
08
Representatives of Technology
189
Unable to Categorize
554
TOTAL
1,398
Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro
Non Metro
Unknown
TOTAL
563
202
633
1,398
B. Educational/Training Activity Topics
Educational/Training Activities by Topic
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities
Participants
AT Products/Services
422
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice
72
Combination of any/all of the above
286
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access
581
Transition
37
Total
1,398
C. Description of Educational/Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
The Wendell Foster Assistive Technology Resource Center provides quarterly virtual trainings to early intervention providers. Various topics are covered each quarter covering types of AT available for younger children and how to access AT through the Kentucky Early Intervention System.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
During our annual assistive technology conference, a Special Education Consultant for the Greater Louisville Education Cooperative, in Louisville, Kentucky, provided training on utilizing the principles of universal design for learning, differentiated learning, and assistive technology in the classroom. Resources regarding assistive technology considerations for transition were provided including the ATWizard website and Assistive Technology Consideration Guide.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Kentucky hosts the Governor's Conference on Leadership, Equality, Accessibility, Diversity (LEAD) each year. The KyLEAD Conference is a professional development opportunity that has attracted management, legal, HR, administrative and other diversity professionals from the public and private sector. The KATS Network provided a virtual training to 541 individuals on making digital resources accessible. KATS Network has been contacted for technical assistance in this area by the Commonwealth Office of Technology as they work to meet the Department of Justice Final Rule on Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
D. IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activity Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received
Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies
00
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented
00
No known outcome at this time
581
Nonrespondent
00
Total
581
Performance Measure Percentage
0%
ACL Target Percentage
70%
Met/Not Met
Not Met
E. Notes:
The majority of the IT/Telecommunications trainings were through the virtual Governor's LEAD Conference. We were unable to survey attendees on the outcome/result.
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education
14%
Employment
19%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
00%
Community Living
67%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT)
00%
Total
100%
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Kentucky Department of Libraries and Archives requested technical assistance on making government services accessible to individuals with disabilities. After a training, several libraries across the state requested technical assistance on evaluating their websites for accessibility and making the necessary changes to allow people with disabilities to access library services.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The KATS Network was part of the reestablishment of the Regional Interagency Transition Team through the Northern Kentucky Cooperative for Educational Services. This Transition Team is responsible for creating a seamless system of support for persons with disabilities to move successfully through school into community living, recreation, continuing education, and employment. The KATS Network assisted in identifying priorities of the Transition Team, one of which was ensuring persons with disabilities had access to their assistive technology after high school. Currently, the KATS Network is participating in monthly meetings to continue to develop transition services.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight
the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types
of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide
those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. While KATS Network has had a funding guide for many years, the Coordinating Center significantly updated the funding guide. During this time period, the KATS Network had 3737 downloads of the new funding guide. Additionally, information was added about the Appalachian Assistive Technology Loan Fund. KATS had 799 hits on the landing page for the loans. The hits on the webpage have risen slowly, but steadily over the year.
2. In October, the KATS Network Coordinating Center and the Easterseals Redwood ATRC participated in the Northern Kentucky Transition Fair. This was the result of connecting with the teachers who were a part of the NKY Transition Roadtrip. We provided information for teachers, parents, transition specialists, job coaches, and more about the assistive technologies we have available for trial in our ATRC and the services provided by the KATS Network. The Transition Fair had a good turn out and we were able to share information with many individuals. Due to this networking event, the KATS Network Coordinating Center was asked to provide technical assistance to the Regional Interagency Transition Team around transitioning assistive technology as students exit school.
Information And Assistance
Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients
AT Device/ Service
AT Funding
Total
Individuals with Disabilities
459
139
598
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives
621
69
690
Representative of Education
54
07
61
Representative of Employment
20
03
23
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation
292
42
334
Representative of Community Living
115
14
129
Representative of Technology
19
02
21
Unable to Categorize
128
04
132
Total
1,708
280
1,988
Referral Types:
People learn about the KATS Network primarily through our online presence. About half of our I& A requests come from people who learn about us through our website. The KATS Network continues to update the website. In the 2024 fiscal year, KATS Network had 53,728 unique visitors to our home page. This year we have significantly upgraded the section on digital accessibility resources. Since adding these webpages in May, views have risen from 23 views in May to reach a total of 2084 views in this fiscal year. The KATS Network’s social media presence increased significantly and positively promoted our services. We have continued to maintain a strong social media presence averaging 1-2 posts per week. We gained 74 followers on our Facebook page and 30 on our Instagram this year. We have also continued to receive frequent I &A messages through Facebook Messenger averaging 2-3 messages per month. Our Assistive Technology Resource Center in Hazard, KY, has been in operation for two years now. As a result, the KATS Network has seen an increase in referrals from the Appalachian regions of Kentucky, primarily from healthcare workers. Some of the greatest needs in this area have been ramps and reuse items.
Referral Sources:
Our partnership with the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation, including the computer loan program, has resulted in several referrals from this agency. While we do work closely with the OVR assistive technology specialists, as more vocational rehabilitation counselors become aware of the KATS Network, we are receiving more direct referrals from them for individuals who may not qualify for OVR services. Thirteen percent of our information and assistance referrals come from social workers and healthcare workers. One of the reasons this has increased is participating in a disability fair at Frazier Rehabilitation Hospital. This was a good way to get information to healthcare workers who then refer patients to the KATS Network. Participation in this fair has also resulted in an upcoming training for their therapists on the use of assistive technology with their patients. Some unique referral sources included the ALS Association, Helen Keller National Center, St Vincent DePaul, and KY Protection and Advocacy.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
Yes
No
KATS Network reached out to the Department of Education in Kentucky. They are very interested in working with KATS to provide and track assistive technology usage for shared devices in the state. However, due to changes in Dept of Ed., we need to identify a new contact. We have also reached out to a local educational cooperative. They are interested in collaborating and we are currently working with them to determine how we can best work together. We have also connected with the Regional Interag
Yes
Yes
KATS Network initiated a computer loan program at the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation's (OVR) McDowell Center. Computers are provided for students to learn screen reading and other technology. The computers were initially obtained from a local community and technical college. One Center (Appalachian Center for Assistive Technology - ACAT) is currently working with OVR to provide pre-employment transition services to high school students with disabilities.
So far, we have loaned computers on 13 separate occasions to allow individuals with disabilities, primarily vision impairments, to prepare for considering employment. In the past, these students could only access the technology during class times, increasing training time and decreasing efficacy. This initiative will continue, but we will need to seek additional funding for the purchase of computers or seek additional computer donations. The ACAT Assistive Technology Resource Center provides Pre-Employment Services to high school students at Perry County High School and Hazard High School. This year, they have provided services to 39 students with disabilities. The income from the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation allows them to continue work with their high school service learning programs and their makerspace activities.
NA
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education, Employment, Community Participation and Integration,
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan, Information & Assistance,
Yes
No
Our newest Assistive Technology Resource Center is a Center for Independent Living and is well connected to the Department of Aging and Independent Living. They are working to strengthen their partnership in the area of assistive technology. This is an ongoing project to improve collaboration in this area.
Yes
No
Multiple points of contact have been made, but we have had a difficult time reaching someone in the Medicaid office who is open to working with the KATS Network. We will continue to work on finding contacts. The current state regulations require that Medicaid purchase new equipment. We are working to find a way to let Medicaid recipients know they can return the equipment to KATS when they are finished using it.
Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities
1
A. Coordination/Collaboration
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The KATS Network continues to collaborate with the University of Kentucky, King's Daughters Medical Center, Vocational Rehabilitation, and our ATRC in Hazard to develop an ATRC for Eastern Kentucky. At this point, the University of Kentucky has purchased King's Daughters and there continues to be strong interest in starting an ATRC funded through the hospital and embedded in the health care clinic. This will be a fully-functioning ATRC, but managed as a satellite of the ATRC in Hazard (ACAT - Appalachian Center for Assistive Technology). This is a long-term project that continues to progress.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
No measurable results at this time. Project still in its early stages.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; Information & Assistance;
Overview of State Improvement Activities
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting?
00
Additional And Leveraged Funds
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report?
Yes
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
Fund Source
Amount
Use of Funds
Data Reported
Public/State Agency
$8,583
Public Awareness, I&A
True
Amount: $8,583
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding
to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public
health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below.
Please report the amount expended (drawn down and liquidated) in this reporting period, FY24:
|
$57,082.00
Please report the number of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions this funding supported by type. This can be a direct employee FTE or contractual FTE.
Type of FTE Position
FTE Positions (0.01 to 9.99)
Assistive Technology Specialist
0.00
Information and Assistance Specialist
0.00
Outreach and Awareness Specialist
0.09
Training Specialist
0.00
Health Care Professional (includes PT, OT, SLP)
0.09
Accessibility Expert
0.00
Policy Expert
0.00
Technology Expert (Digital Divide, Mobile Tech)
0.03
Program Manager
0.00
Other positions needed to advance public health and prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVid-19 (describe with narrative field required)
0.12
Please describe the activities of the above FTE and how such activities advance public health.
The activities have been two-fold. First, we have been working on completing technical assistance with training and development of resources to allow for Public Health agencies to provide accessible digital materials. We have posted resources in a accessible ICT section on our website and continue to update the information. So far, we have had 2084 visits to this portion of our site. Second, we surveyed public health agencies and people with disabilities about access to and utilization of preventative care services, especially vaccines, such as the COVID vaccine, and examine the differences in service provision between urban and rural health departments. The results of the survey indicated that public health agencies need to do a better job with improving physical accessibility, communication about available services, and enhancing the scheduling of appointments, especially with regard to individuals with disabilities. We are planning to use the results of the study to apply for additional grant money to provide disability training to public health agencies.
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
This FY24 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.