Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 13 | 04 | 17 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Rejected | 47 | 42 | 89 |
Total | 60 | 46 | 106 |
Lowest Income: | $11,208 | Highest Income: | $69,384 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$492,132 | 17 | $28,949 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 05 | 05 | 04 | 02 | 01 | 00 | 17 |
Percentage of Loans | 29.41% | 29.41% | 23.53% | 11.76% | 5.88% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 17 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 17 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 17 | $55,153 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 17 | $55,153 |
Lowest | 0% |
---|---|
Highest | 10% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
94 | 17 | 5.52941176470588% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 04 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 03 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 08 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 02 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 17 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 05 | $10,831 |
Daily living | 02 | $1,868 |
Environmental adaptations | 04 | $12,982 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 05 | $28,296 |
Computers and related | 01 | $1,176 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 17 | $55,153 |
Number Loans in default | 02 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $2,673 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
A loan for a modified vehicle was requested through Able Up Iowa to be used for an individual with a brain injury. There was a custom gas tank on the vehicle which caused the dollar amount to vary from a typical request. This loan was partially forgivable as the family is participating in the Empowerment Program offered by Able Up Iowa, this program provides a partial amount of the original loan to be forgiven as long as the applicant participates by working with a financial coach. Participation in this program allowed the family to access a modified vehicle for transportation and community connection. As staff followed up, the borrowers daughter responded: “(Mom) is coming along really well! Her goals this month will be to increase eye focus and tracking! She has shown tons of improvement seeming to be more aware and able to use more of her facial expressions. She’s showing more signs of consciousness overall and I can tell when she stretches she’s gaining more strength!! She can even bend her legs a tad while coughing slightly lifting her knees! Well… until next time!”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 17 | 17 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 17 | 17 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 17 | 17 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 17 | 17 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 12 | 70.59% |
Satisfied | 02 | 11.76% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 03 | 17.65% |
Total Surveyed | 17 | |
Response rate % | 82.35% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 01 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 270 |
C. Total | 271 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 271 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 | $500 | $100 | $400 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 01 | $500 | $100 | $400 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 04 | $16,000 | $500 | $15,500 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 136 | $149,540 | $5,760 | $143,780 |
Daily Living | 77 | $77,800 | $3,605 | $74,195 |
Environmental Adaptations | 117 | $53,830 | $5,910 | $47,920 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 03 | $120 | $30 | $90 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $4,000 | $125 | $3,875 |
Total | 338 | $301,290 | $15,930 | $285,360 |
Joshua, a young man who experienced a spinal cord injury as a result of a vehicle accident, was provided with a manual wheelchair upon leaving rehabilitation which was funded through his private insurance. Upon returning home to his rural farm, Joshua found that the manual wheelchair was not enough to navigate the rough terrain of the gravel, dirt, and rough concrete landscape of his farm. Joshua sought funding for a power wheelchair but his insurance would not fund a second mobility device. Joshua accessed a power wheelchair from Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Durable Medical Equipment Loan Program. Joshua, his parents, and others in his network were so grateful for this addition to his independence that they shared kind words stating, "Thank you so much for your time and the chance to use this device. It is a life changer!". Joshua is now able to participate actively as an employee of a cattle operation and as a family employee on his father's row-crop operation.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 03 | 180 | 186 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 05 | 61 | 71 |
4. Subtotal | 09 | 08 | 254 | 271 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 09 | 08 | 254 | 271 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 09 | 08 | 254 | 271 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 260 | 95.94% |
Satisfied | 11 | 4.06% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 271 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 193 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 07 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 00 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 17 |
Total | 217 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 80 | 06 | 86 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 17 | 00 | 17 |
Representative of Education | 08 | 02 | 10 |
Representative of Employment | 18 | 02 | 20 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 29 | 01 | 30 |
Representatives of Community Living | 13 | 02 | 15 |
Representatives of Technology | 28 | 11 | 39 |
Total | 193 | 24 | 217 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 46 | 12 | 58 |
Hearing | 43 | 06 | 49 |
Speech Communication | 12 | 03 | 15 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 320 | 18 | 338 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 10 | 01 | 11 |
Daily Living | 206 | 47 | 253 |
Environmental Adaptations | 18 | 02 | 20 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 07 | 02 | 09 |
Computers and Related | 177 | 21 | 198 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 66 | 01 | 67 |
Total | 905 | 113 | 1,018 |
Margo experienced a stroke in 2021 and wanted to gain independence when eating. Margo’s left side was impacted resulting in minimal dexterity in the left hand. Margo met with an AT team member and borrowed several devices from the lending library including a Stress-Less Drink Holder, Stickybowl, Plate Guards, and a Non-slip Place Mat. After an opportunity to borrow the devices for a 30-day trial, Margo and her family were optimistic. After a follow-up by a team member, the following response was received by Margo, "Thank you for checking in. I am using all of it and found the plate guards, drink holder, and sticky mat very helpful. I wish I would have had them a long time ago."
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 80 | 11 | 97 | 188 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Subtotal | 80 | 11 | 99 | 190 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
Subtotal | 81 | 11 | 101 | 193 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 81 | 11 | 101 | 193 |
Performance on this measure | 98.77% | 100% | 98.02% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 01 | 05 | 08 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 07 | 01 | 02 | 10 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 09 | 02 | 09 | 20 |
5. None of the above | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
6. Subtotal | 12 | 02 | 10 | 24 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 12 | 02 | 10 | 24 |
9. Performance on this measure | 75% | 100% | 90% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 197 | 90.78% |
Satisfied | 18 | 8.29% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.92% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 217 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 14 |
Hearing | 05 |
Speech Communication | 13 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 70 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 |
Daily Living | 61 |
Environmental Adaptations | 16 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 08 |
Computers and Related | 51 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 12 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 259 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 193 | 24 | 217 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 22 | 89 | 111 |
Representatives of Education | 11 | 24 | 35 |
Representatives of Employment | 06 | 14 | 20 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 18 | 55 | 73 |
Representative of Community Living | 09 | 56 | 65 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 259 | 262 | 521 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 09 |
Service Provider | 01 |
Vendor | 375 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 07 |
Total | 392 |
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program partnered with The Des Moines Performing Arts theatres to offer a demonstration of various sensory devices including noise-canceling headphones, sensory weighted lap pads, sensory fidgets, and noise amplification devices for attendees who experience the theatre setting in different ways than other guests. Over 20 demonstrations occurred, offering attendees more knowledge about the impact of Assistive Technology, time to compare and contrast devices, and information on how to access devices from the Lending Library at Easterseals Iowa.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 27 | 20 | 178 | 225 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 04 | 11 | 18 |
Subtotal | 30 | 24 | 189 | 243 |
Have not made a decision | 02 | 09 | 05 | 16 |
Subtotal | 32 | 33 | 194 | 259 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 32 | 33 | 194 | 259 |
Performance on this measure | 93.75% | 72.73% | 97.42% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 446 | 85.6% |
Satisfied | 65 | 12.48% |
Satisfied somewhat | 10 | 1.92% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 521 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 04 | 202 | 211 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 08 | 01 | 15 | 24 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 05 | 63 | 73 |
4. Subtotal | 18 | 10 | 280 | 308 |
5. None of the above | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
6. Subtotal | 21 | 10 | 281 | 312 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 21 | 10 | 281 | 312 |
9. Performance on this measure | 61.9% | 50% | 77.22% | 75.32% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 107 | 31 | 275 | 413 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 04 | 13 | 20 |
Subtotal | 110 | 35 | 288 | 433 |
Have not made a decision | 03 | 09 | 07 | 19 |
Subtotal | 113 | 44 | 295 | 452 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 113 | 44 | 295 | 452 |
Performance on this measure | 97.35% | 79.55% | 97.63% | 95.8% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 98.83% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.71% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 420 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 10 |
Representatives of Education | 119 |
Representatives of Employment | 344 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 439 |
Representatives of Community Living | 250 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 51 |
TOTAL | 1,633 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
984 | 329 | 320 | 1,633 |
Primary Topic of Educational/Training Activities | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,272 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 66 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 248 |
Transition | 47 |
Total | 1,633 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance educational/training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program presented to the Iowa Association of Realtors to an audience of over 100 attendees. This presentation focused on overcoming the barriers to accessible, affordable, and available housing for individuals with disabilities and older persons. This opportunity also offered an overview of digital accessibility, housing accessibility features, and realtors' access to Lending Library devices for potential home buyers.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program collaborated with the Iowa Developmental Disabilities Council with the 2024 Annual Make Your Mark Conference. This event is developed for Iowans with disabilities, direct care support professionals, parents and family members, and other disability advocates together to increase civic engagement, advocacy, and leadership skills. The ESI Assistive Technology Program held a vendor booth demonstrating, discussing, and supporting attendees with any assistive technology questions. Small sensory kits were developed and loaned to attendees who requested additional sensory support during sessions. A sensory room designed as a quiet space with sensory outlets for attendees was also coordinated and staffed by the ESI Assistive Technology team members. The conference successfully supported Iowans of transition age and their team, to recognize the need for assistive technology better and identify ways to access tools in the future.
Briefly describe one educational/training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program team members revised modules of a pre-existing ICT Course and enhanced the modules by breaking the material into six modules with accessible and applicable content. The Digital Access for Everyone Course is a two-hour, in entirety, introductory course covering the top five items to support attendees in creating accessible content. Each module can be accomplished in as little as fifteen minutes and includes a survey, quiz, and certificate of completion. To best implement the content, ESI Assistive Technology Program team members have developed two-hour in-person training sessions to enhance the experience. These modules supported over 200 individuals in the fiscal year.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Educational/Training Activities Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 248 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 248 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 05% |
---|---|
Employment | 15% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 50% |
Community Living | 25% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 05% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program Leadership served on the Iowa Digital Accessibility Plan Advisory Committee. This opportunity allowed us to ensure that the State Plan included individuals with disabilities, older Iowans, and the utilization of assistive technology to address the broadband gaps in Iowa. This participation led to Easterseals Iowa submitting a proposal to serve as the sub-contractor for the implementation of Iowa's Digital Accessibility Plan.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Through the BluePrint for Change Federal Employment Grant, Easterseals Iowa provided Technical Assistance to update the Employment First Manual to include assistive technology. This Manual will be utilized with persons of transition age, as well as other Iowans seeking employment.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program partnered with Special Olympics Iowa Summer Games to offer a sensory room with various devices and spaces to provide a break from the games. This space served as a resource for many individuals and, as individuals in need received the sensory input desired, their support team was able to connect with ESI Assistive Technology team members to learn additional details about the program and services.
2. The Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff implemented a partnership with the Des Moines Public Library to provide a selection of assistive technology devices to individuals who access those library services. The devices are featured in the Library of Things that are available for check-out similar to books. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program details are shared with visitors to the library and features in the newsletters are released to the public. The Library of Things is available to anyone over 18 years of age to borrow and includes a detailed description of the use of the devices.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 744 | 101 | 845 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 874 | 90 | 964 |
Representative of Education | 92 | 07 | 99 |
Representative of Employment | 272 | 00 | 272 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 348 | 17 | 365 |
Representative of Community Living | 473 | 48 | 521 |
Representative of Technology | 14 | 00 | 14 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 2,818 | 263 | 3,081 |
The Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program generates an annual outreach plan divided between each team member for individual outreach to various statewide organizations and agencies. This outreach results in a rise in referrals from specific populations or agencies. One such outreach resulted in engagement with the Des Moines Aging Consortium, an educational group for professionals working with seniors in the community. An additional outreach task was to engage with EveryStep Iowa, providing care services and visiting nursing services across Iowa with special care to provide referral information in rural areas. Additional attention was given to developing the outreach plan to focus on organizations that engage with underserved populations including aging Iowans and persons living in rural areas.
The Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program referral sources dominantly resulted from Health Care entities (57%). These sources included individuals seeking to find durable medical equipment, ramps, assistive technology, enabling technology, and other supports that individuals with new diagnoses or surgery found need of. This demonstrated that the ESI Assistive Technology Program outreach to hospitals and healthcare entities was successful, including ongoing MailChimp electronic newsletters providing updates and reminders of the program. The next highest referral source was AT Program customers (29%) demonstrating the quality service individuals receive in engaging with the additional AT services as they return with any information and referral service needs. The final source, at 14%, was in-person outreach this also demonstrates the benefit of the outreach efforts each team member produces.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Additional Coordination/Collaboration activities | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program implemented grant funding from the American Rescue Program Act (ARPA) to pilot a project providing short-term modular aluminum ramps. Applicants will receive support to install a modular ramp that meets their specific needs for up to one year unless funding for a permanent structure is identified or the need no longer exists. Easterseals Iowa remains the owner of the ramps and upon return, they will be recycled and provided to other Iowans in need. Easterseals Iowa collaborated with Habitat for Humanity for the assessment and installation of the ramps.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
As a result of this project, five ramps were installed. Additional applications were received. Many lessons have been learned including various gaps in support in rural communities such as funding for home modifications. Easterseals Iowa team members learned individuals in Iowa experience barriers to paying the monthly limited fee. The fee is necessary for program sustainability and therefore cannot be covered by a scholarship. The intent of the program is the installation of ramps for temporary purposes but on all occasions, additional concerns were identified and addressed prior to the installation of the ramp. For example, some doors were too narrow for accessibility, home clutter blocked an accessible route, and other needs resulted in a substantial amount of unexpected case management and coordination. We will evaluate the project through 2025 to determine sustainability. The coordination with Habitat for Humanity was a gainful partnership to make this pilot project possible.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Housing / Home Automation; Community Participation and Integration; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Reuse;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program collaborated with the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) to train volunteers to demonstrate assistive technology to their peers. The RSVP volunteers are trained on how to demonstrate assistive technology that is provided in a kit of devices to their peers of older Iowans. Each kit contains over 30 low-technology devices that are commonly requested by older Iowans. The RSVP is managed by the Iowa Department of Aging and no additional funding was obtained to implement this initiative, but an MOU, partnership, and agreement are in place.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
As an outcome, two kits were created and volunteers were trained to provide a demonstration of the devices in these kits. Lessons learned from this project include the need for ongoing training and support to the volunteers due to the importance of fidelity and safety in demonstrating assistive technology. This initiative was recently launched in Northwest Iowa, 4 hours from Easterseals Iowa state offices in Des Moines. Attention was given to selecting partnerships to support the locations in Iowa that are a greater distance from Des Moines and underserved in Iowa.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Public Awareness;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
Easterseals Iowa engaged with FEMA Region 7 VAL-Mass Care team, as a result of the devastation of multiple natural disasters including tornadoes and flooding in the state of Iowa. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program Director supported improvements to the temporary housing options offered to Iowans impacted. FEMA Federal staff visited the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program on two separate occasions to engage and learn about services. The FEMA Region 7 featured the collaborative efforts in their quarterly newsletter (https://www.fema.gov/about/organization/region-7).
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
As a result of the support provided, individuals with disabilities were considered to ensure access to the temporary housing options available. Technical Assistance was provided to FEMA during the response which led to FEMA recognizing at both the state and federal levels that there was not representation of the State Disaster Recovery Team to address the needs of Iowans with disabilities and older Iowans. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program is now part of the Iowa Homeland Security Advisory Board that oversees Iowa's response to disaster relief.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The State of Iowa is embarking on the development of a Community Hub Mode that promotes the health and well-being of Iowans. Unfortunately, the HUB was not inclusive of individuals with disabilities and older individuals. The website and related documents were not accessible. As a result, Easterseals Iowa now serves on the HUB's Diversity Equity and Inclusion Advisory Task Force. Additionally, Easterseals Iowa is a subcontractor through the HUB's proposal with USA Aging to ensure assistive technology is a part of a Community Care Hub (CCH) Model.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Additionally, Easterseals Iowa is a subcontractor through the HUB's proposal with USA Aging to ensure assistive technology is a part of a Community Care Hub (CCH) Model. At this time Easterseals Iowa is written into the USA Aging Grant as a subcontractor with efforts to be wrapped up by September 30, 2025. Final policies and procedures are part of the funding that Easterseals Iowa receives through the subcontract.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $43,328 | Public Awareness, I&A | False |
Federal | $38,000 | Device Loan | True |
Federal | $15,000 | Demonstration | True |
Amount: $96,328 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$43,328 as a cumulative was added to account for the Public Health Workforce dollars in section A, although this was reported and described in section B.