National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Wisconsin 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
WisTech Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/wistech/index.htm
Mailing Address:
1 W. Wilson St., Room 551, PO Box 2659
City:
Madison
State:
Wisconsin
Zip Code:
53703
Program Email:
DHSWistech@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Phone:
608-514-2513
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources
Mailing Address:
1 W. Wilson St., Room 551, PO Box 2659
City:
Madison
State:
Wisconsin
Zip Code:
53703
Program URL:
https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/dph/badr.htm

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Plummer, Laura
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
608-514-2513
E-mail:
laura.plummer1@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Plummer, Laura
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
608-514-2513
E-mail:
laura.plummer1@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Sobczyk, Lisa
Title:
Social Services Supervisor
Phone:
608-266-9354
E-mail:
lisa.sobczyk@dhs.wisconsin.gov

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Molke, Carrie
Title:
Bureau Director
Phone:
608-267-5267
E-mail:
Carrie.Molke@dhs.wisconsin.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 11 09 20
Approved Not made 03 02 05
Rejected 01 00 01
Total 15 11 26

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $11,352 Highest Income: $98,900

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$1,001,163 20 $50,058

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 05 07 03 01 01 03 20
Percentage of Loans 25% 35% 15% 5% 5% 15% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 20 100%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 20 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 20 $253,777
Total 20 $253,777

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4%
Highest 4%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
80 20 4%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 20
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 20

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 01 $5,040
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 03 $4,000
Daily living 01 $3,900
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 10 $240,837
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 15 $253,777

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 07
Net loss for loans in default $48,896

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)1496
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)998
C. Total Served2494

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures2494

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 2888$222,644
Hearing 2076$473,781
Speech communication609$189,607
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning105$39,582
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 51$22,180
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total5729$947,794



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Direct consumer testimonial: "I would like to comment on the WisLoan program at Independence First. The program was really great. I am disabled and was in need of a lift chair. Because of the program, I was able to get a loan to buy my chair. My loan was set up with the payment taken automatically, which makes it really easy on me. The staff made the loan application process effortless and simple to understand. I am so thankful for this opportunity and I love my lift chair. It makes my life so much better! I would highly recommend this program."

Impact Area

A consumer working with the iCanConnect (ICC) program was able to successfully use the program to acquire technology that supports to her independence and ability to communicate. This consumer has a combined hearing and vision loss and also uses a wheelchair. Her disabilities prevent her from socializing and accessing the community as much as she would like. She had expressed interest in a smartphone, but her family discouraged her, believing she didn’t have the skills to use it. This consumer had an assessment through the ICC program and during the assessment she picked up skills with an iPhone rather quickly. Through the ICC program she received an iPhone, a Braille display, and a stand for the iPhone. The stand allowed her to position the phone to see friends when making video calls and attending meetings. The ICC program provided the training she needed for making phone calls, sending text messages, using Voice Over (screen reading), and using the device with the Braille display. The sounds from her iPhone, including the screen reader, go directly into her hearing aids. With the ICC funded equipment and device training, this consumer is now able to regularly text her family and friends and participate in remote meetings with others who are DeafBlind. All of this can be done without needing to leave her apartment. This consumer is thrilled to have shown her family what she is cable of doing and loves interacting with people throughout the day.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 2,514 2,514
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 2,514 2,514
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 2,514 2,514
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 2,514 2,514
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 20 0.8%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 2,494 99.2%
Total Surveyed 2,514
Response rate % 0.8%

G. Notes:

Satisfaction is not tracked specifically within our telecommunication programsx.

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 207
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 3,352
C. Total 3,559

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 3,559

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 18 $1,280 $0 $1,280
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 97 $97,500 $2,950 $94,550
Daily Living 183 $5,283 $0 $5,283
Environmental Adaptations 09 $300 $0 $300
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $100,000 $53,000 $47,000
Computers and Related 01 $100 $0 $100
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 $100 $0 $100
Total 310 $204,563 $55,950 $148,613

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 33 $6,165 $100 $6,065
Hearing 105 $53,161 $240 $52,921
Speech Communication 266 $159,826 $0 $159,826
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 04 $155 $0 $155
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 2,881 $986,239 $0 $986,239
Daily Living 553 $48,957 $10 $48,947
Environmental Adaptations 47 $3,917 $0 $3,917
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 02 $80 $0 $80
Computers and Related 15 $3,070 $0 $3,070
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 20 $1,353 $80 $1,273
Total 3,926 $1,262,923 $430 $1,262,493

D. Anecdote

Options for Independent Living, a WisTech subcontractor, serves numerous counties and a staff member encountered an accessibility concern as they traveled in their service area. A staff member was driving past a home and happened to notice a family attempting to push someone up a homemade ramp that was created by 2x4 lumber. The staff member stopped and approached the family with an offer to provide a safer ramp option through their reuse program. They shared information about ramp safety both for the person who uses the wheelchair and for the family caregivers. The following day the family went to Options and picked up a portable ramp for use at their home. During that conversation, the family mentioned that rubber on the wheelchair wheels was disintegrating. Options was also able to provide a wheelchair for this individual to use through the reuse program.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 3,074 3,074
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 3,074 3,074
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 3,074 3,074
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 485 485
8. Total 00 00 3,559 3,559
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% 86.37%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 239 6.72%
Satisfied 2,835 79.66%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 485 13.63%
Total Surveyed 3,559
Response rate % 86.37%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 594
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 126
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 448
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 18
Total 1,186

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 364 427 791
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 38 114 152
Representative of Education 144 11 155
Representative of Employment 05 02 07
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 19 06 25
Representatives of Community Living 14 28 42
Representatives of Technology 10 04 14
Total 594 592 1,186

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 76 14 90
Hearing 160 43 203
Speech Communication 137 07 144
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 16 06 22
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 90 429 519
Daily Living 151 197 348
Environmental Adaptations 35 94 129
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 04 06 10
Computers and Related 83 18 101
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 68 43 111
Total 820 857 1,677

E. Anecdote

A WisTech consumer who has ALS contacted their local Independent Living Center, Options for Independent Living, for assistive technology to assist with eating. WisTech added an Obi robotic feeding device to the loan and demonstration inventory this year. This device will be available to any of our subcontractors but is currently being shared by two primary programs. This consumer and her husband had the opportunity to borrow the device and decided that it would meet their needs. Consumer quote: “For me, it was great. I have ALS, and I have limited mobility remaining in my arms. For most meals my husband, who is my caregiver, must feed me. I pre-programmed the robotic feeding arm to always feed me at the right height. Since I control the robotic arms motion, I could eat as slowly or as fast as I chose. My legs still work well, so I can push the controllers with my feet. My ALS is slow moving, so I should be able to use the Obi in this manner for many years.” This device gave my husband the opportunity to prepare my food and then get a plate for himself and sit down and enjoy his food without having to attend to me all the time. I know this will not work well for all people, but for me it is the next best thing to having my arms back! I have begun working with both Obi and my insurance company, to determine the best way to secure this device for my future.”

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 84 13 287 384
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 19 07 95 121
Subtotal 103 20 382 505
Have not made a decision 63 00 26 89
Subtotal 166 20 408 594
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 166 20 408 594
Performance on this measure 62.05% 100% 93.63%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 08 09 311 328
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 06 141 148
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 03 02 111 116
4. Subtotal 12 17 563 592
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 12 17 563 592
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 12 17 563 592
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 922 77.74%
Satisfied 221 18.63%
Satisfied somewhat 34 2.87%
Not at all satisfied 09 0.76%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 1,186
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 54
Hearing 144
Speech Communication 08
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 38
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 110
Daily Living 176
Environmental Adaptations 47
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 01
Computers and Related 106
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 65
Total # of Device Demonstrations 749

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 619 635 1,254
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 93 400 493
Representatives of Education 07 18 25
Representatives of Employment 01 11 12
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 12 15 27
Representative of Community Living 17 52 69
Representative of Technology 00 07 07
Total 749 1,138 1,887

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 387
Service Provider 107
Vendor 25
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 519

D. Anecdote

One of the WisTech subcontractors, Independence First, worked with an individual who has a spinal cord injury. This individual recently immigrated to the United States and was planning to become employed as a language interpreter. This work will take place at his home and they had secured funding through a grant to support any accommodation needs. This individual and a representative from the granting program visited the WisTech program’s loan and demonstration center to try out solutions in a variety of areas. This individual tried out devices in the hearing, daily living, and computer access categories. As this individual tried a device and made a decision that it would work for them, the funder went online and made the purchase. The devices purchased included a bone conduction headset, a computer stand, and a trackball mouse. They also tried out some solutions for carrying the computer but made the decision that these alternatives would not work as well as what they are currently doing.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 29 48 403 480
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 02 11 64 77
Subtotal 31 59 467 557
Have not made a decision 07 10 174 191
Subtotal 38 69 641 748
Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
Total 38 69 642 749
Performance on this measure 81.58% 85.51% 72.74%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,021 54.11%
Satisfied 79 4.19%
Satisfied somewhat 15 0.79%
Not at all satisfied 03 0.16%
Nonrespondent 769 40.75%
Total 1,887
Response rate % 59.25%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 08 09 2,825 2,842
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 06 3,215 3,222
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 03 02 111 116
4. Subtotal 12 17 6,151 6,180
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 12 17 6,151 6,180
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 485 485
8. Total 12 17 6,636 6,665
9. Performance on this measure 75% 88.24% 91.02% 90.98%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 113 61 690 864
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 21 18 159 198
Subtotal 134 79 849 1,062
Have not made a decision 70 10 200 280
Subtotal 204 89 1,049 1,342
Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
Total 204 89 1,050 1,343
Performance on this measure 65.69% 88.76% 80.86% 79.08%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 98.87% 95% Met
Response Rate 59.02% 90% Not Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 1,142
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 259
Representatives of Education 190
Representatives of Employment 175
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 814
Representatives of Community Living 571
Representatives of Technology 146
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 3,297

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,821 1,233 243 3,297

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 413
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 99
Combination of any/all of the above 2,522
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 163
Transition 100
Total 3,297

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Options for Independent Living, a WisTech subcontractor, serves several rural communities and has been conducting in-depth technology trainings to reduce social isolation through the use of smartphones and tablets. The training consists of a five-week curriculum covering how to operate a smart phone (charging, button navigation, etc.), setting up the accessibility features, selecting apps, and using distance communication tools such as Zoom and Facetime. A final component is an app sharing session where participants can share their favorite uses of the smartphone to reduce social isolation. The program has found that limiting the training to twelve participants allows for ample individualized assistance. Their most recent training class took place on Washington Island in Door County, Wisconsin. Washington Island is only accessible via ferry service which creates a geographic barrier to social connectivity. Bringing this training to the residents of Washington Island has had led to a significant reduction to social isolation among its residents which is demonstrated by their own creation of a Cookies, Coffee, and Conversation group. While this curriculum is modeled after a grant the program received during the pandemic the outcomes were so positive that it has been expanded beyond the original grant. In addition to gaining technology skills, the participants have noted a reduction in social isolation.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

WisTech hosted a webinar training on the use of native iOS smartphone applications to support transition. This training was made available statewide through Zoom and is also archived on the WisTech YouTube channel. More than 70 service providers were able to learn how native apps and functions on iOS devices can facilitate transition for high school students to post-secondary education, community living, and employment. Attendees consisted of vocational rehabilitation counselors, educators, therapists, and independent living center staff.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

WisTech staff from the Department of Health Services conducted a comprehensive training on document and information accessibility to statewide staff from the Aging and Disability Resources Centers (ADRCs), including the Tribal ADRCs. Approximately 110 staff members attended this training, and they will be incorporating the information learned to ensure that the information that is provided to Wisconsin residents is fully accessible.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 158
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 05
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 163
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 01%
Employment 00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 01%
Community Living 97%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 01%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Options for Independent Living, a WisTech subcontractor, has been focusing on increased accessibility for recreation both in their service area and throughout Wisconsin. There has been technical assistance with municipal parks and recreation programs, curling clubs, and the hosting of sled hockey and ice-skating events. Statewide TA is provided by their staff member who serves on the Disability Advisory Council for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The work on this council impacts Wisconsin resident’s access to state parks and trails. Through this advocacy, several Wisconsin state parks have purchased Actiontrack chairs and are making them available for daily visitors to use.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

WisTech staff from the Department of Health Services provided technical assistance internally on the development of new informational materials for enrollment in long term care programs. This TA included in-depth education on document accessibility, ongoing review of informational material content, and remediation of documents to ensure full access for individuals enrolling in long-term care programs in Wisconsin. Wisconsin residents seek out long-term care services to remain independent in their own homes or to transition from an institutional setting back to their own residence.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. WisTech partnered with Wisconsin’s AgrAbility program to exhibit at the annual Farm Technology Days. This statewide event averages an attendance of over 40,000 individuals. Our shared exhibit space allowed us to highlight assistive technology and resources for farmers, their families, and others connected to the agricultural industry. Over the course of three days the staff at this event logged over 450 in-depth conversations and responses to assistive technology.

2. Center for Independent Living for Western Wisconsin, CILWW, a WisTech subcontractor, took a new approach to public awareness during federal fiscal year 2023. This agency participated as a vendor at the local farmer’s market from June through October. The staff were able to educate the community in Western Wisconsin about WisTech, WisLoan, and assistive technology resources in general. Each week they brought different pieces of assistive technology to have on display. The feedback from our community has been great, many individuals we talked to were excited to have such a great resource.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 10,531 8,155 18,686
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 9,177 7,565 16,742
Representative of Education 109 14 123
Representative of Employment 61 04 65
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 231 35 266
Representative of Community Living 7,048 6,609 13,657
Representative of Technology 34 10 44
Unable to Categorize 06 00 06
Total 27,197 22,392 49,589

Referral Types:

WisTech operates using a hybrid model of conducting program activities from our office directly and through subcontracts and program partners. The types of individuals requesting information and assistance is broad and reaches every county within our state. The Independent Living Center network reaches people with disabilities, their families, and community service providers from the grassroots level. Several of our program partners, including the ALS Association reach population specific audiences. An additional type of referral comes from our collaboration with the statewide telecommunication programs which include the Telecommunications Equipment Purchase Program (TEPP), the Telecommunications Assistance Program (TAP), and the iCanConnect program. The telecom programs specifically drive referrals to our loan and demo programs to provide the opportunity to try out devices and decide if it will meet their needs or not.

Referral Sources:

WisTech continues to receive a significant number of referrals for information and assistance and for this reporting year these requests have more than doubled. Our partnership with the Aging and Disability Resource Centers continues to demonstrate the demand for information and assistance in the area of assistive technology. We are able to gather information from each ADRC which reflects the number of I&A requests related to AT broken out by county. We have begun tracking the requests from the Independent Living Centers by county as well. This can guide us as we conduct targeted outreach to underserved areas.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 2

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

WisTech has begun a collaboration with the Division of Medicaid Services (DMS) within the Department of Health Services and the Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs). Wisconsin has received American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to address the barriers to remaining independent and to delay enrollment into Medicaid funded long-term care programs. The Independent Living Supports Pilot (ILSP) program was launched in early September 2023 and sixteen counties are participating in the pilot. Individuals with disabilities or health conditions who meet the program income requirements can be eligible for up to $7,200 to offset the costs of services, modifications, or assistive technology needed to remain independent, thus delaying their enrollment in long-term care services. Services can address things such as personal or home care, moving costs, and transportation. Assistive technology or home modifications can include ramps, barrier free showers, stair glides, mobility devices, and other solutions to address the needs of people with disabilities and their caregivers. WisTech is supporting this program through assistive technology, home modification, and vehicle modification consultations with the participants. The research component of this pilot program will guide future long-term care programming in Wisconsin. WisTech will continue support of this program throughout FFY24 and will be able to share outcomes and further details in the next annual progress report.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The Independent Living Supports Pilot (ILSP) program will be available to Wisconsin residents who have a disability or a health condition and meet program income limits through March of 2025. The program will include a research component to determine the cost savings and effectiveness of delaying enrollment in long-term care programs. WisTech anticipates an increased awareness for our program throughout the pilot counties along with ongoing collaboration between our Independent Living Centers and the Aging and Disability Resource Centers.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Housing / Home Automation; Transportation; Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Information & Assistance; Technical Assistance;

A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

Midstate Independent Living (MILC), a WisTech subcontractor, received two wheelchairs as a donation from a consumer. These wheelchairs were in “ok” condition but not up to the standard that the agency was comfortable with for consumer donations. MILC collaborated with a local Humane Association to provide these wheelchairs for desensitization training for animals. They have introduced these donated wheelchairs as part of their routine training, so animals are comfortable which wheelchairs. The area where this Humane Association is located has a higher population of veterans, including those with disabilities and PTSD. This collaboration recently was highlighted on the local television news.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

This initiative has the potential to be replicated by other WisTech subcontractors throughout Wisconsin.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Veterans;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Reuse; Training;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Federal$20,953Technical AssistanceTrue
Amount: $20,953

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:17:07 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.