Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 97 | 11 | 108 |
Approved Not made | 10 | 01 | 11 |
Rejected | 45 | 05 | 50 |
Total | 152 | 17 | 169 |
Lowest Income: | $5,004 | Highest Income: | $327,288 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$7,883,487 | 108 | $72,995 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 16 | 17 | 18 | 12 | 09 | 36 | 108 |
Percentage of Loans | 14.81% | 15.74% | 16.67% | 11.11% | 8.33% | 33.33% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 108 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 108 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 108 | $1,476,515 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 108 | $1,476,515 |
Lowest | 5% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
540 | 108 | 5% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 108 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 108 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 03 | $3,467 |
Hearing | 33 | $98,321 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 11 | $18,670 |
Daily living | 26 | $69,952 |
Environmental adaptations | 01 | $7,060 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 43 | $1,271,764 |
Computers and related | 09 | $7,281 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 126 | $1,476,515 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 2 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Individual Development Accounts |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 4 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
C. Total Served | 4 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 4 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 7 | $666 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 1 | $2,638 |
Daily living | 18 | $3,592 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 2 | $1,000 |
Computers and related | 12 | $3,626 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 4 | $280 |
Total | 44 | $11,802 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 61 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 2 |
C. Total Served | 63 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 63 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 31 | $30,539 |
Hearing | 11 | $2,166 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 3 | $102 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 45 | $40,611 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 90 | $73,418 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
“Mary” lives in a senior living community in Seattle, WA. In June 2023, Mary took out her fifth assistive technology loan from WATAP’s state financing partner, Northwest Access Fund, to purchase a 4-wheeled scooter to replace a 3-wheeled scooter that no longer fit her needs. In the past, she has used loans to purchase other assistive technology including a lift recliner and a wheelchair. Northwest Access Fund’s financing works well for Mary, as the affordable monthly payment works with her limited monthly income. The technology she has purchased makes a significant difference in her ability to live independently, allowing her to go to the store and doctors’ appointments, and to socialize with friends and family. The loans Mary has taken out have helped to build her credit, from a score in the mid-400s in 2019 when she first applied to Northwest Access Fund to over 600 in 2023. Northwest Access Fund has also supported Mary in accessing available resources, such as energy subsidies, that have put money back into her monthly budget and allowed her to start saving $50 monthly. She often refers members in her community to Northwest Access Fund—including her roommate Teddy, who recently received financing for a powerchair—as she says that the Northwest Access Fund is the only way so many of her friends could acquire the mobility equipment that they need.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 09 | 80 | 91 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 69 | 71 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 13 | 13 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 11 | 162 | 175 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 02 | 11 | 162 | 175 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 02 | 11 | 162 | 175 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 158 | 90.29% |
Satisfied | 16 | 9.14% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.57% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 175 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,833 |
C. Total | 2,833 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,833 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 08 | $18,388 | $1,600 | $16,788 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 2,067 | $2,709,734 | $0 | $2,709,734 |
Daily Living | 2,273 | $406,827 | $0 | $406,827 |
Environmental Adaptations | 118 | $6,561 | $0 | $6,561 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 4,466 | $3,141,510 | $1,600 | $3,139,910 |
Makayla came to WATAP’s device reuse partner, Bridge Disability Ministries’ Meyer Medical Equipment Center, looking for a pediatric gait trainer for her four-year-old daughter, Brooklyn. One of the local medical centers helps to support the Equipment Center with pediatric equipment drives and as a result, they have a large selection of pediatric equipment including bath and shower chairs, standers, activity chairs, strollers, pediatric wheelchairs, tilt-in-space chairs, as well as replacement parts and accessories. One of the center’s volunteers, Trish, is a physical therapist who specializes in working with children and helps make sure children, like Brooklyn, receive appropriate equipment from the wide variety, range of sizes, and makes and models available for children. Brooklyn was provided an appropriate gait trainer, which was a great financial and emotional relief for Makayla. She was grateful to Meyer Medical Equipment Center for having exactly what her daughter needed, stating “if you need equipment, they are the place to go.”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 1,686 | 1,686 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 825 | 825 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 322 | 322 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 2,833 | 2,833 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 2,833 | 2,833 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 2,833 | 2,833 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,637 | 93.08% |
Satisfied | 85 | 3% |
Satisfied somewhat | 45 | 1.59% |
Not at all satisfied | 31 | 1.09% |
Nonrespondent | 35 | 1.24% |
Total Surveyed | 2,833 | |
Response rate % | 98.76% |
Our durable medical and daily living device reuse partner discontinued using their former inventory control system on January 1, 2023 and temporarily transitioned to a manual process to record details of each piece of equipment provided and to track inventory. Coupled with volunteer and staff turnover and shortage, the data from January 1-September 30, 2023 was likely an under count in terms of number of individuals served, equipment provided, and associated data. They are confident that their data for FY2024 will be accurate.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 428 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 06 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 02 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 01 |
Total | 437 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 362 | 06 | 368 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 11 | 00 | 11 |
Representative of Education | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representative of Employment | 10 | 01 | 11 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 42 | 02 | 44 |
Representatives of Community Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representatives of Technology | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Total | 428 | 09 | 437 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 21 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 106 | 03 | 109 |
Hearing | 38 | 01 | 39 |
Speech Communication | 11 | 00 | 11 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 19 | 01 | 20 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 07 | 00 | 07 |
Daily Living | 146 | 00 | 146 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 176 | 03 | 179 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 53 | 02 | 55 |
Total | 556 | 10 | 566 |
WATAP has a partnership with Timberland Regional Library System, which serves 5 counties in largely rural southwest WA at 34 branch locations. The partnership provides a collection of assistive technology available for borrowing through the online library catalog, which are then delivered to a local library branch for pick up. The devices in the collection are easy-to-use, readily available from retailers, and help support independent living. This program reaches seniors in rural communities who commonly do not self-identify as having a disability. Users of the program provide data and comments on postcards to WATAP. This past year, many users reported that by borrowing and trying the device, they were able to find something they needed, with several reporting that they later purchased the device. “Edgar” tried an extended shoehorn and stated he had no idea something like it existed. He was able to buy one from an online retailer. Another user, “Kara,” borrowed Max TV glasses and found that the device worked very well for her and she also purchased the device online. A simple rubber jar opener included in the collection was rated as the best tool “Chris” had ever used for opening jars! Overwhelmingly, users were grateful that the partnership was making the items available in their library system for people to try.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 22 | 41 | 153 | 216 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 02 | 02 | 05 |
Subtotal | 23 | 43 | 155 | 221 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Subtotal | 23 | 44 | 155 | 222 |
Nonrespondent | 04 | 08 | 194 | 206 |
Total | 27 | 52 | 349 | 428 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 97.73% | 68.33% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 03 | 00 | 03 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 00 | 00 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 03 | 00 | 05 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 03 | 03 | 00 | 06 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 02 | 00 | 03 |
8. Total | 04 | 05 | 00 | 09 |
9. Performance on this measure | 66.67% | 100% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 248 | 56.75% |
Satisfied | 08 | 1.83% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.23% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 180 | 41.19% |
Total Surveyed | 437 | |
Response rate % | 58.81% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 35 |
Hearing | 39 |
Speech Communication | 36 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 52 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 45 |
Daily Living | 64 |
Environmental Adaptations | 17 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 107 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 30 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 425 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 350 | 01 | 351 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 23 | 67 | 90 |
Representatives of Education | 00 | 07 | 07 |
Representatives of Employment | 30 | 32 | 62 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 21 | 00 | 21 |
Representative of Community Living | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Total | 425 | 111 | 536 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
Service Provider | 03 |
Vendor | 63 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 66 |
WATAP participated in the Seattle Design Festival Block Party, where our installation featured a bathroom concept that showcased universal design concepts and examples of assistive technology that could be used for self-care and bathing. “Silvia” and “Jim” stopped by and were pleased to see an installation that featured universal design and accessibility and had an in-depth conversation with one of WATAP’s staff who was volunteering at the event. Silvia and Jim are both older adults who were looking for ways to continue living in their home and had not thought about some of the devices available for them to try. They tried long-handled sponges, a long-handled shoehorn, and a sock aid, but they were most interested in the portable grab bars. They had mounted grab bars in their own bathroom but when they were traveling and staying at hotels or with friends or family members, they often found themselves wishing they had grab bars in those places too. The WATAP staff person demonstrated how to safely use the bars, explaining the limitations and other measures to consider when using portable grab bars. But even with these considerations in mind, the couple were surprised at how well they worked even on the relatively rough installation walls. Silvia later wrote that they had purchased the grab bars online and had already used them on several different occasions. The couple were pleased that the bars worked really well for their traveling needs. They had never thought they would find such a valuable tool while visiting the festival.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 07 | 241 | 94 | 342 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 75 | 05 | 81 |
Subtotal | 08 | 316 | 99 | 423 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Subtotal | 08 | 316 | 101 | 425 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 08 | 316 | 101 | 425 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 98.02% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 382 | 71.27% |
Satisfied | 148 | 27.61% |
Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 1.12% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 536 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 12 | 1,766 | 1,780 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 02 | 894 | 898 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 335 | 335 |
4. Subtotal | 04 | 14 | 2,995 | 3,013 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 14 | 2,995 | 3,014 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 02 | 00 | 03 |
8. Total | 06 | 16 | 2,995 | 3,017 |
9. Performance on this measure | 80% | 100% | 88.81% | 88.85% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 29 | 282 | 247 | 558 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 77 | 07 | 86 |
Subtotal | 31 | 359 | 254 | 644 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Subtotal | 31 | 360 | 256 | 647 |
Nonrespondent | 04 | 08 | 194 | 206 |
Total | 35 | 368 | 450 | 853 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 99.72% | 77.44% | 89.57% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 97.77% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 94.60% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 147 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 59 |
Representatives of Education | 09 |
Representatives of Employment | 158 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 77 |
Representatives of Community Living | 45 |
Representatives of Technology | 155 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 650 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
634 | 16 | 00 | 650 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 170 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 337 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 81 |
Transition | 62 |
Total | 650 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP continues to support the professional development for Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) case managers, employment specialists, and community rehabilitation providers through a series of training opportunities. We provided 17 trainings, 9 in-person and 8 via webinar to 234 participants. The series topics were (1) An Introduction to AT; (2) AT for Safety and Independent Living; (3) Low Tech Solutions for Employment; (4) AT for Learning Disabilities; (5) Ergonomics and Computer Access; (6) AT for Aging Workers; and (7) AT for Sensory Loss. Consistent with preceding years, WATAP’s trainings for DVR were designed to build competencies, promote the consideration of and proper matching of AT, and explore case studies and best practices around topics that have been identified by past participants as needed to better serve DVR clients. All participants are surveyed post training and we continue to address training topic requests and other AT needs from the field.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP participated in the Youth Leadership and Transition Forum, a cooperative project of the state Governor’s Committee on Disability Issues and Employment (GCDE), with support from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, the Department of Services for the Blind, and other community partners, including WATAP. Additionally, WATAP provided training at 2 other regional Workshops on Transition for school to work and supported employment participants. Forum and workshop participants not only had the opportunity to explore AT options that can benefit and maintain and/or increase their independence and performance in school but could also meet their changing needs as they transition to post-secondary education, employment and community living. Participants discussed AT services that can be accessed to support decision making as well as resources that could help them with transition related issues.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
WATAP was invited by the City of Seattle to provide on-line training to city employees responsible for developing and posting online content as part of their day-long recognition of the Global Accessibility Awareness Day on May 18, 2023. Our training was provided to 81 participants and the topic was a step-by-step guide and best practices for creating accessible Microsoft Word documents. Participants are using the information gained from this training to improve and implement policies and practices within various city departments to ensure accessibility of citywide resources available on and downloaded from websites and social media sites.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 81 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 81 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 05% |
---|---|
Employment | 15% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 20% |
Community Living | 50% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 10% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
WATAP Staff continue to work with various departments in the City of Seattle and King County to support and promote accessible information and communication technology. Staff provided one-on-one consultation to city personnel around correcting accessibility problems on website and addressing electronic document accessibility. WATAP hopes to provide on-going training to support city and county staff to develop policies and procedures that will help departments to address, problem-solve, and correct web and electronic document accessibility issues within their current and future staffing.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP partnered with AARP Washington, NW Universal Design Council, and Age Friendly Seattle, in planning, designing, and hosting a series of Age-Friendly Housing Forums: “Where Will Seattle's Older Adults Live?” The November 2 kick-off event featured two WATAP staff and one of our Advisory Council members in a panel discussion on how age-friendly home design and assistive technology can help people extend the years they can live safely and comfortably in their homes. Attendees also had the opportunity to visit WATAP’s resource table and experience daily living aids and smart home technology to support independent living. Subsequent forums took place on January 23, March 6, and April 14 and although WATAP had less of a role in these later discussions, participants’ efforts are creating housing environments and resources where seniors who are using AT will certainly benefit.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. WATAP participated in the Seattle Design Festival Block Party August 18-20, 2023, partnering with the Northwest Universal Design Council, Jensen Hughes, and Age Friendly Seattle on an installation, titled “How can design drive inclusivity in our homes and neighborhoods.” Our installation featured a bathroom concept that showcased universal design aspects and examples of assistive technology that could be used for self-care and bathing. We had 647 individuals interact with the installation over the weekend, and about 115 having more in-depth conversations around universal design and assistive technology with the installation volunteers. This event allows us to interact and educate more members of the general public about the uses and benefits of assistive technology.
2. WATAP neared completion of a 5-year project funded by King County Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy providing assistive technology services and resources to low-income seniors and unpaid caregivers in rural and tribal communities in King County. We partnered with senior centers located within rural communities to connect with the community to promote healthy independent living, and as a means for us to showcase assistive technology and talk about the potential impact in the daily lives of seniors. WATAP partnered in 12 community events at these senior centers, where we also offered opportunities for training and device demonstrations. WATAP reached over 193 seniors, their caregivers, and their health care provider through tabling and outreach presentations; training workshops focusing on AT to support gardening, medication management, communication, home safety and emergency preparedness, independent living and self-care, hearing, and vision, and low-tech solutions; and device demonstrations and device loans in connection with these events as well.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 617 | 164 | 781 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 399 | 93 | 492 |
Representative of Education | 85 | 36 | 121 |
Representative of Employment | 197 | 27 | 224 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 137 | 18 | 155 |
Representative of Community Living | 198 | 111 | 309 |
Representative of Technology | 23 | 12 | 35 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 1,656 | 461 | 2,117 |
Many individuals (~63%) learn about WATAP through community partners and their programs but also as a result of our own outreach (~22%), both in-person and virtual, and through our training and technical assistance efforts provided across the state. One example of on-going outreach that has resulted in increased referrals is through our King County project described under the public awareness section, which has resulted in an increase of rural seniors and their care givers accessing our programs. Another example is our Assistive Technology Providers Network, which promotes more meaningful professional networking, enhances collaboration among the network members and community partners, and promotes cross dissemination of information and resources. Referrals through our Providers Network has resulted in more meaningful referrals over the years from health care practitioners, educators, rehabilitation counselors especially for our device demonstration and device lending programs.
The largest portions of our referrals come through our relationships with our employment/ vocational rehabilitation agencies (estimated at 23%), through our state financing partners at the Northwest Access Fund and iCanConnect WA (20%), and through relationships with regional health care providers (14%). We also receive a significant portion of referrals through our in-person outreach (14%), other outreach including webinars (8%) and through Community Living Connects (estimated at 7%) which WATAP is a part of and includes agencies supporting independent living, aging and adult services, veterans, and caregivers. Remaining referrals (estimated at about 8%) come from education, WA AgrAbility, friends and family, and with the remaining 5% of our referrals as not known.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
In March of 2023, WATAP began supporting the Washington State Department of Services for the Blind (DSB) Independent Living Services (ILS) program, which provides services to over 1500 Washington State residents annually who are losing vision or blind. ILS utilizes a statewide network of providers, who have experienced teachers who assist clients in teaching and building competency in daily living skills. During the pandemic, ILS began providing smart phones, tablets, and digital assistants, such as Amazon Echo and Google Nest, through a long-term loan program to clients, but the providers’ teachers were often unfamiliar and/or inexperienced in the benefits and usages of these devices, which limited the success of the program. WATAP provided 2 full days of training on technology for the providers’ teachers Participants learned how to navigate smart phones using built in magnification, screen reading, and voice assistant tools for specific tasks such as phone calls, voice mail, text messages, email and notes. They also learned how to setup the Digital Assistants and use different features such as calling, routines, skills, calendaring, etc. Each participant had the use of their own devices so they could practice and learn in real time. There was much sharing of knowledge from WATAP staff and participants and at the end of the training, each participant received a document with extensive resources, tips and instructions discussed during the training.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Through this partnership, WATAP supports the professional development needs through annual statewide and comprehensive training for ILS providers’ teachers to increase effective implementation of the long-term loan program to meet independent living outcomes of their clients. As the teachers become more confident in using the technology, they are more likely to match the functional needs of their clients with these technologies and provide the necessary technical support to increase the successful use by the clients as well. This partnership is increasing a cross referral of clients to both WATAP and ILS services that would be mutually beneficial to support building and mastering independent living skills. Since on-going professional development is necessary for current staff and to support training new staff, this training will be provided by WATAP to ILS providers’ teachers annually going forward.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Training;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $73,286 | Technical Assistance | True |
Private | $148,463 | State Financing | True |
Federal | $19,711 | Demonstration | True |
Federal | $16,895 | State Financing | False |
Private | $910 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $9,335 | Demonstration | True |
Public/State Agency | $63,375 | Training | True |
Federal | $19,711 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $33,752 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $17,887 | Device Loan | True |
Amount: $403,325 |
We used funding from our Public Health Workforce Grant to research and develop a on-demand 3D printing last resort program to support independent living. We have launched on October 1, 2023 and will report data from this program in FY2024.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:16:27 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)