National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Utah 2023
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 32 | 09 | 41 |
| Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 32 | 09 | 41 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $24,768 | Highest Income: | $696,000 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $3,529,791 | 41 | $86,092 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 00 | 07 | 04 | 07 | 05 | 18 | 41 |
| Percentage of Loans | 0% | 17.07% | 9.76% | 17.07% | 12.2% | 43.9% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 06 | 14.63% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 35 | 85.37% |
| Total | 41 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 41 | $340,707 |
| Total | 41 | $340,707 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 3% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 6% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 163 | 41 | 3.97560975609756% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 19 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 22 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 41 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 70 | $186,782 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 02 | $74,965 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 04 | $78,960 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 76 | $340,707 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Last resort - Activity |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 76 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 25 |
| C. Total Served | 101 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 101 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 40 | $8,690 |
| Hearing | 3 | $486 |
| Speech communication | 10 | $5,005 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 12 | $4,368 |
| Daily living | 31 | $10,936 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 2 | $574 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 3 | $1,890 |
| Total | 101 | $31,949 |
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 1 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
| C. Total Served | 1 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 1 | $500 | $80 | $420 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 1 | $500 | $80 | $420 |
D. Anecdote
A woman who struggles with paralysis and escaping domestic violence received a life-changing grant from the Utah Assistive Technology Foundation. This grant provided her with a fall detection 2-way wrist voice alert system, offering independence and peace of mind without monthly fees. Grateful for the assistance, she now advocates for the transformative impact of assistive technology, sharing her story to raise awareness.
The Utah Assistive Technology Program (UATP) employs 3D printing to craft practical and affordable solutions for everyday challenges. The story began with Shawnie Christensen, who, due to her Muscular Dystrophy, faced difficulty in daily tasks due to low grip strength. Using a hanger as an improvised grabbing tool, she sought a more efficient solution. UATP stepped in, utilizing 3D printing to create a custom electric grabber tailored to Shawnie's needs. The grabber exceeded expectations, becoming an integral part of Shawnie's daily life until it eventually broke. Undeterred, the UATP lab team, led by Dan O'Crowley, went back to the drawing board, 3D-printing new and improved parts to enhance the device's functionality and durability. Recognizing the tool's value, UATP has shared directions for a DIY version, inviting others to experience the benefits contributing to the accessibility and independence of individuals facing similar challenges.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 15 | 07 | 108 | 130 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 04 | 07 | 12 |
| 4. Subtotal | 16 | 11 | 115 | 142 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 6. Subtotal | 16 | 11 | 116 | 143 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 16 | 11 | 116 | 143 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.14% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 143 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 143 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 481 |
| C. Total | 481 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 481 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 01 | $4,000 | $0 | $4,000 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 02 | $700 | $20 | $680 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $1,040 | $30 | $1,010 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 450 | $430,992 | $62,119 | $368,873 |
| Daily Living | 84 | $15,382 | $656 | $14,726 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 05 | $2,150 | $61 | $2,089 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 02 | $1,000 | $70 | $930 |
| Computers and Related | 02 | $435 | $175 | $260 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 06 | $300 | $118 | $182 |
| Total | 554 | $455,999 | $63,249 | $392,750 |
D. Anecdote
An impactful story unfolded with a consumer facing challenges in securing insurance approval for a much-needed chair. Expressing deep despair over her dependence on others, she visited our SLC shop to explore potential solutions. Fortunately, we had received a generous donation of an exceptional chair, prompting me to refurbish it specifically for her. Upon revealing the completed chair, she was moved to tears, overwhelmed with gratitude. Knowing that this refurbished chair would significantly enhance her independence, allowing her to run errands and manage bathroom trips without relying on family assistance, was immensely rewarding. Witnessing the tangible impact of our work on people's lives and well-being is a powerful reminder of the positive difference we can make.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 13 | 15 | 309 | 337 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 02 | 96 | 101 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 28 | 28 |
| 4. Subtotal | 16 | 17 | 433 | 466 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 15 | 15 |
| 6. Subtotal | 16 | 17 | 448 | 481 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 16 | 17 | 448 | 481 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 96.65% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 476 | 98.96% |
| Satisfied | 02 | 0.42% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.42% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.21% |
| Total Surveyed | 481 | |
| Response rate % | 99.79% |
G. Notes:
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 123 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 11 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 148 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 06 |
| Total | 288 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 68 | 102 | 170 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 35 | 38 | 73 |
| Representative of Education | 06 | 09 | 15 |
| Representative of Employment | 05 | 06 | 11 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 07 | 07 | 14 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representatives of Technology | 02 | 03 | 05 |
| Total | 123 | 165 | 288 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 33 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Hearing | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Speech Communication | 02 | 07 | 09 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 115 | 154 | 269 |
| Daily Living | 22 | 08 | 30 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 03 | 01 | 04 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 143 | 171 | 314 |
E. Anecdote
For events that take place at Salt Lake City’s Washington Square (City Hall campus), pedestrian access to 500 S is important. During the work week, that area becomes displaced parking for the employees and visitors who normally park in the “horseshoe” area. During events, that area is used for event set-up, food trucks, parking, or pedestrian access. Salt Lake City’s blocks are very large so we partnered with the UATP to provide mid-block temporary ramp access for people with disabilities, and older adults. We provided this during the Pride Festival and the Utah Arts Festival and the event organizers and attendees utilized the ramps throughout the event. The success of these temporary ramps showed that there is a need for a permanent solution, so in September 2023 a permanent ramp was installed along with permanent accessible parking spaces adjoining the ramp that were not there previously.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 16 | 03 | 91 | 110 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 11 | 12 |
| Subtotal | 16 | 04 | 102 | 122 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 16 | 04 | 103 | 123 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 16 | 04 | 103 | 123 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.03% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 21 | 01 | 96 | 118 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 06 | 11 | 19 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 00 | 27 | 28 |
| 4. Subtotal | 24 | 07 | 134 | 165 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 24 | 07 | 134 | 165 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 24 | 07 | 134 | 165 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 276 | 95.83% |
| Satisfied | 10 | 3.47% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.69% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 288 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 231 |
| Hearing | 17 |
| Speech Communication | 34 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 24 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 193 |
| Daily Living | 130 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 54 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 49 |
| Computers and Related | 30 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 766 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 694 | 45 | 739 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 54 | 373 | 427 |
| Representatives of Education | 05 | 76 | 81 |
| Representatives of Employment | 01 | 04 | 05 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 03 | 77 | 80 |
| Representative of Community Living | 09 | 46 | 55 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 320 | 320 |
| Total | 766 | 941 | 1,707 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 207 |
| Service Provider | 298 |
| Vendor | 539 |
| Repair Service | 14 |
| Others | 334 |
| Total | 1,392 |
D. Anecdote
We recently received a heartfelt request from the parents of a young individual eager to play Minecraft despite facing challenges due to limited fine motor skills. Despite watching others play on YouTube and observing her brother, the standard Xbox controller posed a barrier for her. Introducing her to the adapted Xbox controller specifically designed for such situations proved to be a game-changer. Making a small modification to one of the joysticks, we customized the controller to suit her needs. After trying it out, the parents were so impressed that they decided to purchase the adapted Xbox for her. Now, with the adapted controller in hand, she's joyfully engaged in playing Minecraft alongside her brother, turning a previously inaccessible activity into a shared source of enjoyment. Witnessing the transformative impact of assistive technology on her gaming experience is a testament to the positive outcomes that thoughtful adaptations can bring to individuals facing unique challenges.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 35 | 60 | 597 | 692 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 20 | 21 |
| Subtotal | 35 | 61 | 617 | 713 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 00 | 46 | 49 |
| Subtotal | 38 | 61 | 663 | 762 |
| Nonrespondent | 04 | 00 | 00 | 04 |
| Total | 42 | 61 | 663 | 766 |
| Performance on this measure | 83.33% | 100% | 93.06% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 1,595 | 93.44% |
| Satisfied | 103 | 6.03% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 09 | 0.53% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 1,707 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 49 | 23 | 513 | 585 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 08 | 107 | 120 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 04 | 62 | 68 |
| 4. Subtotal | 56 | 35 | 682 | 773 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 16 | 16 |
| 6. Subtotal | 56 | 35 | 698 | 789 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 56 | 35 | 698 | 789 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 96.43% | 88.57% | 88.83% | 89.35% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 51 | 63 | 688 | 802 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 02 | 31 | 33 |
| Subtotal | 51 | 65 | 719 | 835 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 00 | 47 | 50 |
| Subtotal | 54 | 65 | 766 | 885 |
| Nonrespondent | 04 | 00 | 00 | 04 |
| Total | 58 | 65 | 766 | 889 |
| Performance on this measure | 87.93% | 100% | 93.86% | 93.93% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Satisfaction Rating
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.50% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 99.96% | 90% | Met |
Training
A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 238 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 70 |
| Representatives of Education | 79 |
| Representatives of Employment | 07 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 50 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 98 |
| Representatives of Technology | 00 |
| Unable to Categorize | 63 |
| TOTAL | 605 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 487 | 04 | 114 | 605 |
B. Training Topics
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 241 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 128 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 195 |
| Transition | 41 |
| Total | 605 |
C. Description of Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Assistive technology is integral to improving the daily lives of individuals by addressing their unique needs and challenges. This encompasses various devices, from tools enhancing accessibility for individuals with disabilities to communication devices for those with speech impairments, mobility devices, and adaptive recreation devices. By providing targeted training across these categories, assistive technology empowers individuals to overcome barriers and fully participate in various facets of life. Its impact extends beyond specific transitional phases, fostering inclusivity and enhancing overall quality of life.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Logan coordinator has taken proactive steps to contribute to the skill development and social integration of transition students from the local school district. Through specialized training, the coordinator has equipped these students with practical knowledge in both hand tools and power tools, providing them with valuable hands-on skills. This training is particularly beneficial as it enhances their ability to engage in various vocational activities and empowers them to participate more actively in potential employment opportunities.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Older adults are proactively acquiring assistive technology tools to enhance their information access and communication capabilities. This involves mastering the use of smart devices and promoting independence within their homes. The emphasis is on empowering older individuals with the skills necessary to navigate digital platforms, access online information, and communicate effectively through different devices, including mobile phones. This initiative aims to foster digital literacy and autonomy, enabling older adults to integrate technology into their daily lives seamlessly.
D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 115 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 47 |
| No known outcome at this time | 32 |
| Nonrespondent | 01 |
| Total | 195 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 83.1% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 05% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 10% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
| Community Living | 80% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 05% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Utah Assistive Technology Program (UATP) is dedicated to offering responsive technical assistance to community members, professionals, and families of individuals with disabilities. This assistance takes the form of direct support through phone consultations and on-site training sessions, addressing the unique needs of those seeking guidance. UATP's commitment lies in promptly and effectively responding to inquiries and concerns related to assistive technology. By providing accessible expertise through phone consultations, they offer real-time assistance to individuals and professionals navigating the complexities of assistive technology solutions.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Utah Assistive Technology Program (UATP) plays a crucial role in facilitating employment training for young adults with disabilities, preparing them for postsecondary education and future careers. Through careful planning, UATP designs and implements tailored training programs that address the specific needs and goals of young adults with disabilities. This collaborative effort involves coordinating with educational institutions, service providers, and families to create an inclusive and supportive environment. The goal is to equip these individuals with the skills, resources, and assistive technologies necessary to enhance their capabilities and independence. By fostering partnerships and communication among all stakeholders, UATP strives to maximize the effectiveness of the training, promoting the successful transition of young adults with disabilities into postsecondary education and future careers.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. In FY23, UATP successfully engaged with 5,464,344 individuals through various channels, including newsletters, blogs, and social media.
2. In July, UATP actively contributed to the CARE Fair, a free health resource event. This initiative aimed to assist underserved communities in Salt Lake City lacking access to healthcare services. UATP played a crucial role in promoting its comprehensive range of services, including a mobility clinic where individuals could assess and address the functionality of their devices.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 247 | 00 | 247 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 121 | 50 | 171 |
| Representative of Education | 74 | 33 | 107 |
| Representative of Employment | 04 | 00 | 04 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 108 | 37 | 145 |
| Representative of Community Living | 20 | 00 | 20 |
| Representative of Technology | 50 | 00 | 50 |
| Unable to Categorize | 04 | 57 | 61 |
| Total | 628 | 177 | 805 |
Referral Types:
Word of mouth has played a crucial role in the success of the outreach efforts. Satisfied consumers have become ambassadors, sharing their positive experiences with others in their communities. This organic dissemination of information has contributed to a growing network of individuals seeking assistance through our program.
Referral Sources:
The diverse distribution of referrals highlights the program's success in reaching and serving individuals with disabilities and their families directly. The collaborative efforts with healthcare professionals, educational institutions, employers, and community living representatives are an asset to our program. A substantial portion, constituting 50% of total referrals, originates directly from individuals with disabilities and their family members. This highlights the program's effectiveness in reaching and resonating with its target audience. Having experienced the program's services, this group serves as influential advocates, contributing to a significant portion of the program's outreach.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
| Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
|---|
A. Coordination/Collaboration
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
In response to the challenges posed by the pandemic, UATP has proactively collaborated with aging communities, forming a particularly close partnership with Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs). UATP's engagement with Aging and Disability Resource Centers reflects a strategic alignment with the evolving needs of aging communities during the ongoing public health crisis. The collaboration extends beyond traditional assistive technology services, providing opportunities to educate older adults to be active in their communities. The partnership involves the provision of resources and information related to vaccines, emphasizing the importance of vaccination within aging populations. This initiative aligns with broader public health efforts to ensure that older adults and individuals with disabilities receive accurate and timely information about vaccination, fostering community well-being and resilience.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Explore opportunities for partnerships and collaborations with other organizations, agencies, or businesses that share similar goals. Collaborative efforts can enhance the reach and effectiveness of resource-sharing initiatives. Develop a sustainability plan that outlines how UATP will continue to share resources with the community beyond the funding period. This could involve exploring alternative funding sources, partnerships, or revenue-generating initiatives to support ongoing activities. It's important to note that the funding for this endeavor is set to conclude on December 31, 2023.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; State Financing; Training; Public Awareness;
Overview of State Improvement Activities
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
Additional And Leveraged Funds
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $20,000 | Demonstration | False |
| Federal | $11,294 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Public/State Agency | $15,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Private | $30,000 | Reuse | False |
| Private | $30,000 | Demonstration | False |
| Private | $3,750 | Demonstration | True |
| Federal | $100,798 | Demonstration | True |
| Federal | $40,319 | State Financing | True |
| Private | $3,750 | Device Loan | True |
| Federal | $43,421 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Private | $8,275 | Reuse | True |
| State Appropriations | $10,000 | Demonstration | True |
| Federal | $100,798 | Device Loan | True |
| State Appropriations | $25,000 | Training | True |
| Federal | $7,530 | Device Loan | True |
| Private | $16,167 | Reuse | True |
| Private | $11,667 | Public Awareness, I&A | False |
| State Appropriations | $50,000 | Reuse | True |
| Federal | $21,710 | Technical Assistance | True |
| Federal | $161,277 | Reuse | True |
| Federal | $151,973 | Training | True |
| Private | $30,789 | Reuse | True |
| State Appropriations | $9,350 | Technical Assistance | True |
| State Appropriations | $5,548 | Device Loan | True |
| State Appropriations | $9,350 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
| Amount: $917,766 |
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
We are currently in the process of customizing the mobile van that UATP acquired through a grant. Thus far, no activities have been carried out.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:15:33 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)