Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 27 | 08 | 35 |
Approved Not made | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Rejected | 15 | 10 | 25 |
Total | 45 | 19 | 64 |
Lowest Income: | $12,480 | Highest Income: | $244,246 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$2,082,582 | 35 | $59,502 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 04 | 09 | 02 | 06 | 06 | 08 | 35 |
Percentage of Loans | 11.43% | 25.71% | 5.71% | 17.14% | 17.14% | 22.86% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 35 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 35 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 35 | $453,240 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 35 | $453,240 |
Lowest | 5% |
---|---|
Highest | 9.25% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
179 | 35 | 5.12142857142857% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 34 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 01 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 35 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 06 | $27,491 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 06 | $18,239 |
Daily living | 11 | $22,047 |
Environmental adaptations | 04 | $68,317 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 09 | $315,590 |
Computers and related | 03 | $1,556 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 39 | $453,240 |
Number Loans in default | 01 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $2,015 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 3 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Last resort - Activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 22 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 1 |
C. Total Served | 23 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 23 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 25 | $1,035 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 25 | $1,035 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Social Isolation and Loneliness Project |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 1856 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 211 |
C. Total Served | 2067 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2067 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 6033 | $150,573 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 6033 | $150,573 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 61 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 11 |
C. Total Served | 72 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 72 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 97 | $16,294 |
Hearing | 250 | $37,243 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 347 | $53,537 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Cooperative Buying Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 245 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 17 |
C. Total Served | 262 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 262 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 155 | $32,174 | $11,873 | $20,301 |
Daily living | 215 | $24,834 | $8,380 | $16,454 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 370 | $57,008 | $20,253 | $36,755 |
Frank, accompanied by his two brothers, discovered the OSATP MarketPlace after a referral from the Salem Hospital for assistive technology devices following a recent stroke. During their visit to our storefront, they explored various options to enhance Frank's day-to-day life. After careful consideration, John, one of Frank's brothers, decided to purchase a leg lifter and a long-handled claw grabber. He expressed gratitude for the reasonable prices, which aligned with his tight budget. A few weeks later, Frank returned to share positive feedback. He reported that the leg lifter and long-handled claw grabber were proving highly beneficial. The leg lifter enabled him to independently get into his car, while the grabber assisted him at home by accommodating his reduced range of motion. Frank highlighted that these devices significantly improved his life, fostering greater independence. Impressed with the positive impact of the purchased items, Frank and his brothers have become repeat customers, regularly returning to explore new products that could further enhance Frank's day-to-day life.
Ms. T., a grandmother who typically spends most of her time at home with limited interaction with family and the community, encountered significant challenges of isolation and loneliness during the pandemic. Fortunately, she discovered the Social Isolation and Loneliness Project, a collaboration between the Oregon AT Program and State Unit on Agency, with the help of a Vietnamese advocate. Excited about the possibilities, Ms. T. learned that she could receive a tablet free of charge through this initiative, enabling her to connect virtually with her family through email and video calls. Despite being a newcomer to technology, Ms. T. sought assistance from the Oregon AT Program to explore the remote training services provided by the project. After participating in several training sessions, Ms. T. gained the skills necessary to independently engage in virtual calls with her family, use YouTube for entertainment, stay updated on news from her home country through the internet, and to stream religious studies. As Ms. T. became more familiar with the device, her connectivity improved, leading to a noticeable reduction in feelings of isolation and loneliness. During a recent training session, Ms. T expressed her gratitude for the Social Isolation and Loneliness Pilot Project, highlighting that without this opportunity, she wouldn't have been able to afford the device and assistance. The estimated savings for Ms. T. from this initiative amount to $3,300. Overall, the project has significantly enhanced Ms. T.'s quality of life by providing technological resources and support, addressing the challenges of isolation exacerbated by the pandemic.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 12 | 2,439 | 2,452 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 12 | 2,446 | 2,459 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 12 | 2,446 | 2,459 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 12 | 2,446 | 2,459 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,052 | 42.78% |
Satisfied | 1,404 | 57.1% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.12% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 2,459 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 07 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 88 |
C. Total | 95 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 95 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 | $11,774 | $535 | $11,239 |
Daily Living | 04 | $450 | $125 | $325 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 07 | $12,224 | $660 | $11,564 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 08 | $20,385 | $800 | $19,585 |
Hearing | 01 | $200 | $0 | $200 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $330 | $0 | $330 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $979 | $0 | $979 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 44 | $31,698 | $2,190 | $29,508 |
Daily Living | 15 | $2,346 | $360 | $1,986 |
Environmental Adaptations | 21 | $12,105 | $20 | $12,085 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $600 | $0 | $600 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 94 | $68,643 | $3,370 | $65,273 |
James, a gentleman with limited mobility, visited the AT Program based on a friend's recommendation. His goal was to find an affordable mobility scooter, and he had diligently explored various local stores without success. All the options he encountered were priced beyond his budget. James was pleased to discover that the AT Program had two mobility scooters available: a brand new one and a recently donated scooter in good condition. After receiving guided safety introduction training, James tried both scooters and was impressed with their maneuverability. His satisfaction reached new heights when he learned that the used scooter was priced at only $250. This made it significantly more affordable than any other option he had considered and fell within his financial means. James decided to purchase the used scooter on the spot, leaving with a newfound sense of freedom, as he can now actively and independently navigate his community.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 05 | 89 | 95 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 05 | 89 | 95 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 05 | 89 | 95 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 05 | 89 | 95 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 84 | 88.42% |
Satisfied | 11 | 11.58% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 95 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 113 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 37 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 03 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 00 |
Total | 153 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 75 | 27 | 102 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 33 | 13 | 46 |
Representative of Education | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representatives of Community Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 113 | 40 | 153 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 19 | 02 | 21 |
Hearing | 04 | 01 | 05 |
Speech Communication | 22 | 04 | 26 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 51 | 20 | 71 |
Daily Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Environmental Adaptations | 33 | 19 | 52 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 07 | 01 | 08 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 140 | 48 | 188 |
Judith, an active writer and athlete in Oregon, discovered the AT Program services online while searching for knee scooter rental options. Despite owning a knee scooter for home use, she encountered difficulties in transporting it from the upstairs area of her home to the garage for running errands, putting her at risk of injury. While visiting the AT Program, a specialist presented various knee scooter options for her to test. This hands-on experience allowed Judith to choose the one that best suited her needs. After selecting a knee scooter, she took it home and, after two months of use, returned to share her appreciation. Judith praised the convenience of the service, particularly highlighting how it eliminated the need to navigate stairs with the scooter, thereby significantly expediting her recovery process.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 09 | 14 | 90 | 113 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 09 | 14 | 90 | 113 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 09 | 14 | 90 | 113 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 09 | 14 | 90 | 113 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 02 | 36 | 40 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 02 | 36 | 40 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 02 | 02 | 36 | 40 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 02 | 02 | 36 | 40 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 123 | 80.39% |
Satisfied | 30 | 19.61% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 153 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 553 |
Hearing | 249 |
Speech Communication | 172 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 165 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 324 |
Daily Living | 549 |
Environmental Adaptations | 190 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 10 |
Computers and Related | 355 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 56 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 2,623 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 837 | 108 | 945 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 363 | 298 | 661 |
Representatives of Education | 157 | 212 | 369 |
Representatives of Employment | 378 | 425 | 803 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 577 | 25 | 602 |
Representative of Community Living | 280 | 237 | 517 |
Representative of Technology | 31 | 24 | 55 |
Total | 2,623 | 1,329 | 3,952 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 813 |
Service Provider | 219 |
Vendor | 4,254 |
Repair Service | 123 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 5,409 |
Ken, a retiree residing in rural southern Oregon, faced challenges using standard computer input devices due to arthritis and Parkinson's disease. His main computer activities, centered around email communication and staying connected with friends and family, became increasingly difficult. Seeking assistance, Ken reached out to the Oregon AT Program. Despite Ken's prior experience with ergonomic keyboards and mice, the program's demonstration introduced him to a variety of lesser-known input devices and software, including the latest programmable ergonomic keyboards and voice recognition software. The revelation of voice recognition technology proved transformative for Ken, enabling him to effortlessly manage his computer inputs and maintain meaningful connections with loved ones. Ken was impressed by the Oregon AT Program's extensive demonstration library and their comprehensive understanding of computer input devices. Expressing his admiration, he pledged to recommend the program to all his friends and family, highlighting the valuable assistance it provided in overcoming his challenges and enhancing his computer experience.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 440 | 829 | 1,354 | 2,623 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 440 | 829 | 1,354 | 2,623 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 440 | 829 | 1,354 | 2,623 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 440 | 829 | 1,354 | 2,623 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,209 | 30.59% |
Satisfied | 2,737 | 69.26% |
Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 0.15% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 3,952 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 19 | 2,564 | 2,587 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
4. Subtotal | 04 | 19 | 2,571 | 2,594 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 04 | 19 | 2,571 | 2,594 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 04 | 19 | 2,571 | 2,594 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.81% | 99.81% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 449 | 843 | 1,444 | 2,736 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 449 | 843 | 1,444 | 2,736 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 449 | 843 | 1,444 | 2,736 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 449 | 843 | 1,444 | 2,736 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.86% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 100% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 171 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 09 |
Representatives of Education | 21 |
Representatives of Employment | 62 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 29 |
Representatives of Community Living | 89 |
Representatives of Technology | 13 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 394 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
264 | 130 | 00 | 394 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 323 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 40 |
Transition | 31 |
Total | 394 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Through an exciting partnership with the State Unit on Aging, the Oregon AT Program has been implementing a Technology Pilot Project. This project aims to deliver a range of technology-related services, including computers, tablets, assistive technologies, and internet access, along with remote training services. The primary goal is to address social isolation and loneliness among seniors and individuals with disabilities throughout the state. Notably, there has been a positive response from Oregon’s Vietnamese communities, with an influx of referrals. Recognizing the preference for in-person assistance within this community, the Oregon AT Program, supported by a highly valued Vietnamese interpreter, has taken training sessions directly to the community. The training sessions held at the community's temple have garnered overwhelmingly positive feedback and appreciation from members of the Vietnamese community. This highlights the success of the project in making a meaningful impact on the lives of seniors and individuals with disabilities, emphasizing the importance of tailoring services to specific community needs.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Specialists from the Oregon AT Program were invited by Multnomah County to deliver a presentation titled "Partnering to Empower Consumer Independence." The session provided a concise overview of program services catering to Oregonians with disabilities. The audience was comprised of twenty-five case managers from across the county responsible for assisting individuals in transitioning from nursing and care facilities back to their homes. During the presentation, attendees were treated to a live, guided tour of the OSATP’s Device Lending Library. The format allowed for interactive engagement, with participants and the co-host posing questions and sharing insights during the tour. The primary focus was on enhancing the attendees' understanding of the available tools that their clients might utilize to promote independence at home or within the community. As a result of the session, participants gained valuable knowledge about the tools at their clients' disposal and acquired insights into the process of requesting live demonstrations within their county and statewide. Overall, the presentation successfully achieved its goal of informing and empowering case managers to better support individuals with disabilities in their journey toward increased independence.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A representative from the Oregon AT Program conducted a highly impactful ICT training at the Seaside Convention Center during the Vocational Rehabilitation In-Service. The focus of the training was to enable participants to maximize the accessibility of Smart Board systems. The session covered the comprehensive understanding and utilization of Smart Board components, including integration with employer-provided laptops. Trainees were also equipped with the knowledge to make reservations through Outlook 365 from any location using their computers. The training delved into the diverse needs of individuals with disabilities, emphasizing the importance of accessibility features such as captioning and remote interpretation. Given that every DHS office in the state is equipped with a Smart Board system, the training aimed to enhance staff efficiency and increase the utilization of the equipment compared to previous years. The anticipated outcome is a more adept and resourceful workforce, better equipped to serve clients with varying accessibility requirements.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 36 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 04 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 40 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 18% |
---|---|
Employment | 36% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 25% |
Community Living | 19% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 02% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
In late spring, several DHS offices in both Eastern and Southern Oregon underwent renovations and expansions. At two rural locations, shared conference room spaces were added to facilitate meetings for Vocational Rehabilitation and other DHS clients with larger support networks. These rooms also served for group orientation activities and as storage spaces for supplies. To ensure inclusivity for individuals with diverse abilities, including those with complex and unseen disabilities, a specialist from the Oregon AT Program was invited to tour these conference rooms and counselor offices. The purpose of the tour was to assess the accessibility of these spaces and provide recommendations for modifications. The specialist subsequently generated reports for each location, offering cost-efficient ideas to maximize usability and accommodate the widest range of people possible.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Joe, a recent high school graduate and member of an Oregon rural Tribe, is diving into college with a focus on mastering welding. Despite being deaf, he tackles communication challenges with innovation. Concerned about limitations imposed by wearing a welding mask, Joe was provided a smartwatch featuring haptic feedback. This technology ensures he receives alerts via SMS messages, prompting him to raise his mask and focus on instructional cues. Unlike high school, having a human interpreter everywhere is impractical. Instead, Joe uses a digital tablet with built-in captioning. The versatile case doubles as a stand, aiding him in comprehending speech through captions and lip-reading. For effective communication, Joe uses an app on his tablet and/or smartwatch to generate verbal responses. This blend of assistive technologies, including haptic feedback, captioning, and specialized apps, empowers Joe to actively participate in his coursework and ensures a successful college experience.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The Oregon AT Program maintains a strong focus on community engagement, a commitment that has gained even greater significance in the post-pandemic landscape. Following the success of a networking event in southern Oregon during the summer, the program was invited to participate in the senior center's 2nd annual Age Well Expo. Throughout the event, an AT specialist hosted an interactive technology exhibit aimed at educating over 275 attendees about the diverse array of services provided by the Statewide AT Program. The exhibit not only highlighted these services but also furnished valuable information on how individuals, regardless of their remote locations in Oregon, can effortlessly access services, information, and technology. This initiative underscores the program's unwavering dedication to reaching and assisting individuals across the entire state.
2. The Oregon AT Program actively implements services for the state's National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program, commonly referred to as iCanConnect. To heighten public awareness of iCanConnect-Oregon, our team employs various strategies to disseminate information about these services. In the current year, we expanded our outreach efforts to include radio advertising, building on our longstanding partnership with a local media company. Our initiative involved the creation of three 30-second commercials, featuring testimonials from iCanConnect consumers, complemented by three 15-second commercials. These advertisements were strategically distributed across both traditional radio waves and streaming platforms over a two-month period. The 30-second ads, aired on a single station, successfully reached an estimated audience of 2,246,400 listeners. Furthermore, the 15-second commercials, broadcast across seven stations, significantly extended our reach to approximately 7,247,200 listeners.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,256 | 459 | 1,715 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 531 | 424 | 955 |
Representative of Education | 307 | 156 | 463 |
Representative of Employment | 762 | 87 | 849 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 550 | 50 | 600 |
Representative of Community Living | 229 | 170 | 399 |
Representative of Technology | 70 | 10 | 80 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 3,705 | 1,356 | 5,061 |
Strengthening agency collaborations, returning to in-person outreach activities and maintaining employment related agency relationships has resulted in increased referrals throughout the year.
The majority of referrals, 75.72%, stem from successful Awareness & Outreach Initiatives, highlighting the importance of engaging the target audience. Program Area Entities/Providers and Disability & Advocacy Entities/Providers contribute 11.97% and 7.47% of referrals, respectively, showcasing the significance of partnerships and advocacy. This data underscores the success of varied strategies, from broad awareness campaigns to targeted efforts, informing future planning for optimized impact within each category.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
To reduce social isolation and loneliness, the Oregon AT Program continued their partnership with the State Unit on Aging and ADRC offices throughout Oregon, providing technology and related services to seniors and individuals with disabilities. This pilot project is being paid for by the federally funded ADRC COVID-19 Relief Grant from the Administration on Community Living (ACL), as well as funding from the American Rescue Plan (ARP).
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Qualified participants received over 5,142 technology related services including robotic pets, computers, tablets, assistive technologies, internet access, as well as remote and in-person training services. These Social Isolation and Loneliness projects allow participants to connect virtually with family, friends, their medical team, and other community events. Due to the success of these pilot projects, the Department of Human Services Long Term Services and Supports are in the early stages of developing a similar partnership project.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
State Financing; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Throughout their academic journey, students may have received AAC devices and necessary support. However, upon transitioning to higher education or community living, unless an AAC device was acquired specifically for them, they now find themselves without a communication tool.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
This initiative aims to address this gap by offering individuals the opportunity to trial AAC devices in their daily lives. Through guidance, it will also assist the individuals' parents and caregiving teams in learning how to provide adequate support, enabling these individuals to gain independence in the next phase of their lives.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Employment; Transportation; Community Participation and Integration; Health; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community);
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Technical Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
An OSATP Specialist is a member of the State Rehabilitation Council. The member is serving on the committee responsible for working with the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency to prepare and update their annual State Plan.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Updates to VR's State Plan strengthens the partnership between VR and the State AT Program, and specifically addresses the need to ensure assistive technology devices and services are considered at each stage of the VR process.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The National Center on Accessible Educational Materials for Learning (AEM Center) is a technical assistance center led by CAST and funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The Center’s goal is to increase the availability and use of AEM and accessible technologies by individuals with disabilities in early learning, K-12, higher education, and workforce development settings. Oregon, along with six other states, have been participating in a national AEM Cohort for the past three years.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
As a member of this Cohort, the Oregon AT Program serves on the Workforce Development Team. With the National Center’s expert assistance, each state in the AEM Cohort is working to develop a coordinated system for providing AEM and accessible technologies to strengthen transitions into and out of K-12 for students with disabilities who need accessible materials and technologies.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Education
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $31,895 | Training | True |
Federal | $135,596 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $30,000 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $128,625 | State Financing | True |
Amount: $326,116 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:13:22 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)