Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 69 | 71 | 140 |
Approved Not made | 14 | 09 | 23 |
Rejected | 53 | 62 | 115 |
Total | 136 | 142 | 278 |
Lowest Income: | $9,600 | Highest Income: | $348,036 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$7,160,141 | 140 | $51,144 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 11 | 35 | 35 | 20 | 11 | 28 | 140 |
Percentage of Loans | 7.86% | 25% | 25% | 14.29% | 7.86% | 20% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 88 | 62.86% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 20 | 14.29% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 32 | 22.86% |
Total | 140 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 88 | $425,569 |
Partnership Loans | 52 | $736,118 |
Total | 140 | $1,161,687 |
Lowest | 5% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
700 | 140 | 5% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 140 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 140 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $2,533 |
Hearing | 216 | $570,883 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $7,771 |
Daily living | 06 | $10,833 |
Environmental adaptations | 07 | $14,605 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 20 | $552,386 |
Computers and related | 03 | $1,694 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 02 | $982 |
Total | 260 | $1,161,687 |
Number Loans in default | 38 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $102,357 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Medicaid iPad |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 41 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 5 |
C. Total Served | 46 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 46 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 46 | $36,585 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 46 | $36,585 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 49 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 7 |
C. Total Served | 56 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 56 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 10 | $40 | $0 | $40 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 4 | $20 | $0 | $20 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 1 | $12 | $0 | $12 |
Daily living | 31 | $310 | $0 | $310 |
Environmental adaptations | 25 | $231 | $0 | $231 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 71 | $613 | $0 | $613 |
Calyssa, from Binger, was looking for an affordable loan to purchase a wheelchair-accessible vehicle. She struggled to get her daughter Sienna, who has cerebral palsy, in and out of her existing vehicle. The ABLE Tech Financial Loan Program helped Calyssa purchase a van that allows her to continue to take Sienna and her siblings to parks, school, and appointments safely. Calyssa said, “No one else would finance this vehicle at a reasonable rate. I am forever grateful for this life-changing program.” The ABLE Tech Financial Loan Program’s low, 5% interest rate can help to make needed assistive technology purchases affordable. To apply for a loan, go to the ABLE Tech Financial Loan webpage or visit the Oklahoma Assistive Technology Foundation’s (OkAT) website.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 27 | 89 | 119 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 06 | 91 | 99 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 06 | 33 | 181 | 220 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
6. Subtotal | 06 | 34 | 182 | 222 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 03 | 17 | 20 |
8. Total | 06 | 37 | 199 | 242 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 89.19% | 90.95% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 144 | 59.5% |
Satisfied | 78 | 32.23% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.83% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 18 | 7.44% |
Total Surveyed | 242 | |
Response rate % | 92.56% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 221 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 1,258 |
C. Total | 1,479 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,479 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 18 | $3,545 | $0 | $3,545 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $15,290 | $0 | $15,290 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $122 | $0 | $122 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 36 | $11,528 | $0 | $11,528 |
Daily Living | 241 | $9,608 | $0 | $9,608 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 01 | $80 | $0 | $80 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $31 | $0 | $31 |
Total | 300 | $40,204 | $0 | $40,204 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 17 | $722 | $0 | $722 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 565 | $244,525 | $0 | $244,525 |
Daily Living | 766 | $74,063 | $0 | $74,063 |
Environmental Adaptations | 63 | $8,824 | $0 | $8,824 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 1,411 | $328,134 | $0 | $328,134 |
As Briggs recovered from surgery to address his bilateral clubfoot relapse, he borrowed leg braces and a posterior pediatric walker from ABLE Tech's Device Reutilization Program. The devices increased not only his safety but his independence at home, school, and in his community. This program is offered in partnership with the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, Oklahoma's Medicaid Agency. Briggs is proud to demonstrate that he is able to be independent around the house, at school, and in the community now that he has the assistance of a walker to help him get around safely! Brigg's mom reports that ince receiving the walker, he has been able to return to school and is doing well.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 03 | 355 | 362 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 05 | 1,104 | 1,115 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 10 | 08 | 1,460 | 1,478 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 10 | 08 | 1,460 | 1,478 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
8. Total | 10 | 09 | 1,460 | 1,479 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 88.89% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,469 | 99.32% |
Satisfied | 06 | 0.41% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 04 | 0.27% |
Total Surveyed | 1,479 | |
Response rate % | 99.73% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 1,914 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 18 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 580 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 61 |
Total | 2,573 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 454 | 516 | 970 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 618 | 20 | 638 |
Representative of Education | 382 | 94 | 476 |
Representative of Employment | 09 | 00 | 09 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 446 | 18 | 464 |
Representatives of Community Living | 03 | 06 | 09 |
Representatives of Technology | 02 | 05 | 07 |
Total | 1,914 | 659 | 2,573 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 42 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 455 | 49 | 504 |
Hearing | 129 | 96 | 225 |
Speech Communication | 1,302 | 73 | 1,375 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 410 | 77 | 487 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 79 | 376 | 455 |
Daily Living | 60 | 83 | 143 |
Environmental Adaptations | 237 | 107 | 344 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 03 | 13 | 16 |
Computers and Related | 311 | 105 | 416 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 177 | 208 | 385 |
Total | 3,163 | 1,187 | 4,350 |
Tarik is a 42-year-old Department of Rehabilitation Services (DRS) client. He has hearing loss and wears a cochlear bone conduction hearing aid attached to a headband. Tarik spends thirty percent of his workday speaking with clients on the Interactive Voice Response computer program that allows humans to interact with a computer operated phone system using voice and other input. He tried regular Shokz bone conducting headphones, but the Bluetooth and audio were not good quality. With the collaborative efforts between the DRS Assistive Technology (AT) Unit and ABLE Tech, Tarik was able to borrow a Shokz OpenComm UC headset with an external microphone, a “Loop 100”, and USB adapter. The adapter ensures direct, dependable, and instant connection and offers access to more devices. Tarik was very pleased with the loan from ABLE Tech and knows this product will work in his place of employment. His goal is to provide the best client care with the use of this headset.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 1,020 | 49 | 601 | 1,670 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 133 | 01 | 47 | 181 |
Subtotal | 1,153 | 50 | 648 | 1,851 |
Have not made a decision | 02 | 00 | 01 | 03 |
Subtotal | 1,155 | 50 | 649 | 1,854 |
Nonrespondent | 32 | 07 | 21 | 60 |
Total | 1,187 | 57 | 670 | 1,914 |
Performance on this measure | 99.83% | 100% | 99.85% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 351 | 01 | 05 | 357 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 266 | 01 | 14 | 281 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 617 | 02 | 19 | 638 |
5. None of the above | 04 | 00 | 02 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 621 | 02 | 21 | 644 |
7. Nonrespondent | 10 | 00 | 05 | 15 |
8. Total | 631 | 02 | 26 | 659 |
9. Performance on this measure | 99.36% | 100% | 90.48% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,188 | 85.04% |
Satisfied | 287 | 11.15% |
Satisfied somewhat | 23 | 0.89% |
Not at all satisfied | 07 | 0.27% |
Nonrespondent | 68 | 2.64% |
Total Surveyed | 2,573 | |
Response rate % | 97.36% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 2,202 |
Hearing | 30 |
Speech Communication | 3,368 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 223 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 543 |
Daily Living | 524 |
Environmental Adaptations | 251 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 1,158 |
Computers and Related | 45 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 160 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 8,504 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 6,743 | 1,595 | 8,338 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 1,338 | 3,100 | 4,438 |
Representatives of Education | 68 | 127 | 195 |
Representatives of Employment | 03 | 21 | 24 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 342 | 1,047 | 1,389 |
Representative of Community Living | 08 | 37 | 45 |
Representative of Technology | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Total | 8,504 | 5,927 | 14,431 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 10 |
Service Provider | 20 |
Vendor | 132 |
Repair Service | 02 |
Others | 30 |
Total | 194 |
Sue, from Oklahoma County, was able to receive a demonstration of low vision equipment through ABLE Tech’s partner, New View Oklahoma. ABLE Tech partners with various organizations across the state to increase outreach and service to Oklahomans to trial and learn about assistive technology (AT). Sue received low vision support services through New View Oklahoma to increase skills and knowledge in hopes to regain her independence. Sue lives a very active lifestyle, enjoying quilting, reading, and attending church with friends. During her demonstration of wearable magnifying glasses, Sue jumped right in to implementing and utilizing the AT demonstrated with her. She says, “Using this device changes everything for me!” and says she can’t wait to be of more help to her quilting group using her new skills!
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 3,305 | 241 | 4,681 | 8,227 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 16 | 22 | 82 | 120 |
Subtotal | 3,321 | 263 | 4,763 | 8,347 |
Have not made a decision | 14 | 03 | 136 | 153 |
Subtotal | 3,335 | 266 | 4,899 | 8,500 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
Total | 3,336 | 266 | 4,902 | 8,504 |
Performance on this measure | 99.55% | 98.87% | 97.16% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 10,957 | 75.93% |
Satisfied | 3,289 | 22.79% |
Satisfied somewhat | 145 | 1% |
Not at all satisfied | 29 | 0.2% |
Nonrespondent | 11 | 0.08% |
Total | 14,431 | |
Response rate % | 99.92% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 358 | 31 | 449 | 838 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 274 | 12 | 1,209 | 1,495 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
4. Subtotal | 633 | 43 | 1,660 | 2,336 |
5. None of the above | 04 | 01 | 03 | 08 |
6. Subtotal | 637 | 44 | 1,663 | 2,344 |
7. Nonrespondent | 10 | 04 | 22 | 36 |
8. Total | 647 | 48 | 1,685 | 2,380 |
9. Performance on this measure | 99.22% | 89.58% | 98.69% | 98.65% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 4,325 | 290 | 5,282 | 9,897 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 149 | 23 | 129 | 301 |
Subtotal | 4,474 | 313 | 5,411 | 10,198 |
Have not made a decision | 16 | 03 | 137 | 156 |
Subtotal | 4,490 | 316 | 5,548 | 10,354 |
Nonrespondent | 33 | 07 | 24 | 64 |
Total | 4,523 | 323 | 5,572 | 10,418 |
Performance on this measure | 99.62% | 99.05% | 97.48% | 98.46% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 98.89% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.46% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 626 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 30 |
Representatives of Education | 1,296 |
Representatives of Employment | 23 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 691 |
Representatives of Community Living | 405 |
Representatives of Technology | 123 |
Unable to Categorize | 69 |
TOTAL | 3,263 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,493 | 557 | 1,213 | 3,263 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 605 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 172 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 1,542 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 222 |
Transition | 722 |
Total | 3,263 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
In FFY23 ABLE Tech staff began offering an Empowering Voices, Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) workshop on effective AAC evaluations. This course is designed for speech therapists, educators, and other professionals who work with individuals of all ages with communication difficulties. The course provides an overview of AAC and its importance in supporting individuals with communication challenges. Participants also received hands-on experience with speech communication assistive technology, allowing them to gain practical knowledge and experience in selecting and using AAC devices. In addition, the course provides information on funding options for AAC devices, including grants, insurance coverage, and other financial assistance programs. By the end of the course, participants have a better understanding of the importance of effective AAC evaluations and will have the skills and knowledge necessary to conduct their own evaluations. Empowering Voices trainer and content-developer, Averie Lucas, was nominated and recognized by the American Speech Language Hearing Association (ASHA) as an ASHA Innovator.The ASHA Innovator is a social media feature designed to recognize and spotlight the challenging and demanding work performed throughout the country by talented and innovative communications sciences and disorders (CSD) practitioners. The initiative is led by ASHA’s 2023 Board of Directors President Robert M. Augustine, PhD, CCC-SLP.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
After the release of the ABLE Tech course catalog containing self-paced e-learning courses on digital accessibility, ABLE Tech staff scheduled two trainings for individuals related to transition from the State Department of Education and the Department Rehabilitation Services to educate them on the course catalog and help them start to identify students who may benefit from these courses. The courses are intended to be used to help educators and those serving transition-aged students (Pre-Employment Transition Services or Pre-ETS) counselors create more accessible content but also to help train individuals, such as the students in transition, to become accessibility professionals or add these crucial skills to their resumes to make them more marketable professionals in the workforce.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
This year, ABLE Tech released its course catalog containing self-paced e-learning courses on digital accessibility. At the end of this fiscal year, there were 9 courses in the catalog, on topics ranging from introductions to assistive technology and digital accessibility to Microsoft PowerPoint accessibility. The goal of these courses is to help more Oklahomans learn asynchronously than could be trained via live events with the small staff at ABLE Tech. The courses also enhance the in-person trainings the Digital Accessibility Team provides. With the hire of an instructional designer using Public Health Workforce funds, ABLE Tech has the ability to design courses that encourage true behavior change, creating a potentially huge ripple effect across all of the environments learners are in. Below is some feedback ABLE Tech has received from anonymous surveys in the courses: • Describing Complex Images: "This course was jam-packed with a lot of useful information! I especially appreciate the practical examples." • It Depends: Different Issues, Different Solutions: "I thought this course was easy to navigate and found it to be very informative. I do know a little bit about AT and digital accessibility, but I learned several new things in this course that I will take with me into my professional environments." • Accessibility in Microsoft Word: "This course was extremely helpful! Practicing with the unformatted document was a wonderful learning tool. I learned aspects of Word that I was not familiar with (modifying headings and charts and creating table of contents). I may go through it again to practice more! Thank you so much!"
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 167 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 32 |
No known outcome at this time | 13 |
Nonrespondent | 10 |
Total | 222 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 89.6% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 82% |
---|---|
Employment | 01% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
Community Living | 06% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 11% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
ABLE Tech's Digital Accessibility Team performed an accessibility review of approximately 30 of Tulsa Community College’s (TCC) websites and web applications. Barriers were found on each site, and the team continues to support TCC as they make changes to these websites or ask vendors who own the websites to make these changes. This assessment effort exposed a large amount of accessibility barriers across the TCC digital presence, filled a gap they have in current staffing to perform accessibility reviews, and informed their need for a new position to manage and maintain digital accessibility.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Last fiscal year, ABLE Tech's Digital Accessibility Team presented a webinar for the Oklahoma Transition Institute (OTI) to help both organizers and speakers understand how to prepare a PowerPoint presentation that is accessible. This year, the Digital Accessibility Team was able to share the new courses on Microsoft PowerPoint Accessibility for both PC and Mac with the organizers of OTI in addition to offering them the webinar. This provided organizers and speakers with two means of learning about PowerPoint accessibility and led to continued success with the accessibility of the presentations.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Two members of ABLE Tech's Digital Accessibility team attended the Oklahoma Library Association (OLA) Conference, holding a booth that attracted a huge number of people. With over 500 attendees, this event turned out to be a very successful public awareness event that led to at least four follow-ups from individual libraries and an increase in requests to speak at various library-related events, such as a lunch and learn event for a very large Metropolitan Library System and next year’s OLA conference. This is an audience in great need of information related to both digital accessibility and assistive technology, and it will be an audience ABLE Tech continues to work with as much as possible.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 10,922 | 388 | 11,310 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 1,237 | 53 | 1,290 |
Representative of Education | 539 | 20 | 559 |
Representative of Employment | 191 | 01 | 192 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 1,690 | 136 | 1,826 |
Representative of Community Living | 570 | 09 | 579 |
Representative of Technology | 31 | 05 | 36 |
Unable to Categorize | 697 | 03 | 700 |
Total | 15,877 | 615 | 16,492 |
Increasing relationships with Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) looks to have increased referrals. Over the last couple of years, ABLE Tech went from collaborating with one AAA via a memorandum of agreement to collaborating with three AAAs via contracts. Collaborating with Oklahoma Human Services Developmental Disabilities Services to create Smart Home spaces has potentially been a catalyst for increased referrals from Other Disability Sources. Better data tracking practices have potentially led to capturing more referrals from Health Care Sources.
As a result of collaboration and coordination with two Home and Community Based Waiver programs in Oklahoma, ADvantage Waiver and Developmental Disability Services (DDS) Waiver, ABLE Tech has seen an increase in referrals for assistive technology training, exploration, demonstrations, and short-term loans. ABLE Tech has been able to provide an increase in Smart Home Demonstration training opportunities with measurable outcomes. ABLE Tech has received an increase in referrals for all program activities and has been able to provide referrals to qualifying individuals who are payor sources assisting Oklahomans with the acquisition of AT.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
In 2023, Oklahoma Developmental Disabilities Services (DDS) Home and Community-Based Waivers implemented the coverage of assistive technology, enabling devices, and remote services. In anticipation of this, Oklahoma ABLE Tech collaborated with DDS to provide additional training and exploration of assistive technology, enabling devices, and remote support services to DDS. Three Smart Home Demonstrations sites were created to provide in-depth training and exploration of AT options available to individuals to successfully stay or maintain independence in the home. This effort greatly expanded ABLE Tech’s demonstration and training efforts while providing additional support from and collaboration with DDS. This video shares more about the collaboration with DDS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V71-Gc4P41M
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The collaboration with DDS to create Smart Home Demonstration spaces gave ABLE Tech the funding needed to develop and expand resources for individuals in community / home environments. A main focus has been on highlighting smart devices that can be used as assistive technology. Prior to this funding, ABLE Tech did not have the technology and remote support devices to demonstrate. The collaboration and funding allowed ABLE Tech to not only increase demonstrations of AT but also create virtual resources to reach more individuals statewide. People can learn about this AT whether in person, through virtual tours, or through self-directed virtual tours.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Housing / Home Automation; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Training;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
ADvantage Waiver Paying for AT/Enabling Technology - ABLE Tech has spent the last year working closely with the Oklahoma Health Care Authority, ADvantage Waiver Program, to assist in the development of policy and practice regarding the provision of assistive technology and enabling devices through waiver funds. ABLE Tech was consulted at various levels to ensure providers and staff were trained and knowledgeable on the use, expected outcomes, and benefits of implementing assistive technology through the waiver program.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
The Oklahoma Health Care Authority Policies and Rules - Policy (317:35-17-3) was revised in 2023 to include the coverage of assistive technology and remote support services through Home and Community-Based waiver services. //oklahoma.gov/ohca/policies-and-rules/xpolicy/medical-assistance-for-adults-and-children-eligibility/advantage-waiver-services/advantage-program-services.html
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $25,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Private | $4,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $12,000 | Reuse | True |
Private | $63,344 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $3,000 | Reuse | True |
State Appropriations | $8,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Federal | $14,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $9,000 | Reuse | True |
Public/State Agency | $20,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $78,000 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $155,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Federal | $32,626 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $10,000 | Reuse | True |
Public/State Agency | $6,285 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $70,000 | Demonstration | True |
Public/State Agency | $24,158 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $22,260 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $125,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $5,021 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $45,748 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $20,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $8,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $175,000 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $235,000 | Reuse | True |
Federal | $6,092 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $90,000 | Demonstration | True |
Public/State Agency | $100,000 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $100,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $10,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Amount: $1,476,534 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N/A
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:12:53 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)