National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Ohio 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Assistive Technology of Ohio
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
atohio.engineering.osu.edu
Mailing Address:
1314 Kinnear Road Area 200
City:
Columbus
State:
OH
Zip Code:
43212
Program Email:
atohio@osu.edu
Phone:
800-784-3425
TTY:
614-292-3621

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
The Ohio State University College of Engineering
Mailing Address:
1971 Neil Avenue #278
City:
Columbus
State:
OH
Zip Code:
4210
Program URL:
engineering.osu.edu

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
William T. Darling
Title:
Director
Phone:
614-292-7721
E-mail:
darling.12@osu.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Marras, William
Title:
Principal Investigator
Phone:
614-292-6670
E-mail:
marras.1@osu.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
William Cole Willis
Title:
Sponsored Program Officer
Phone:
614-247-6080
E-mail:
willis.608@osu.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Lease-To-Own program

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)4
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)3
C. Total Served7

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures7

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 2$5,000
Hearing 0$0
Speech communication0$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 5$25,000
Mobility, seating and positioning0$0
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 0$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total7$30,000



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

We have 5 robots being used around the state by children with disabilities and children with cancer diagnoses. This continues to be an innovative way for children to be able to attend school if they are not physically able to do so.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 07 00 00 07
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 07 00 00 07
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 07 00 00 07
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 07 00 00 07
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 07 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 07
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 3,176
C. Total 3,176

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 3,176

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,142 $232,062 $0 $232,062
Daily Living 656 $31,400 $0 $31,400
Environmental Adaptations 1,303 $106,986 $0 $106,986
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 114 $23,682 $2,195 $21,487
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 $139 $0 $139
Total 3,216 $394,269 $2,195 $392,074

D. Anecdote

I told my friend about your program and she was able to get a computer through Ohio State as well. Now we are able to stay in touch with each other, even though we don't see each other very often!" - B.B. in Cleveland.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 15 07 3,145 3,167
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 00 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 00 01 02
4. Subtotal 17 07 3,148 3,172
5. None of the above 02 00 02 04
6. Subtotal 19 07 3,150 3,176
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 19 07 3,150 3,176
9. Performance on this measure 89.47% 100% 99.94%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 2,504 78.84%
Satisfied 267 8.41%
Satisfied somewhat 127 4%
Not at all satisfied 95 2.99%
Nonrespondent 183 5.76%
Total Surveyed 3,176
Response rate % 94.24%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 193
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 00
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 195
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 00
Total 388

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 171 00 171
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 03 195 198
Representative of Education 10 00 10
Representative of Employment 01 00 01
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 03 00 03
Representatives of Community Living 01 00 01
Representatives of Technology 04 00 04
Total 193 195 388

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 30 00 30
Hearing 03 00 03
Speech Communication 112 00 112
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 35 00 35
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 104 104
Daily Living 28 24 52
Environmental Adaptations 01 18 19
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 34 08 42
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 04 41 45
Total 247 195 442

E. Anecdote

“AT Ohio has been instrumental to the success of the AAC trials I run, particularly for caregiver education/training. The families’ ability to trial these devices within their home for at least a month prior to receiving their own device is so helpful in terms of building their knowledge and confidence. I can’t count how many families have lit up and been so grateful to know that there is a free resource available to support their AAC journey. As an SLP, I’m also grateful that AT Ohio keeps a robust inventory of AT and AAC equipment.”

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 53 05 47 105
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 11 00 15 26
Subtotal 64 05 62 131
Have not made a decision 33 03 24 60
Subtotal 97 08 86 191
Nonrespondent 02 00 00 02
Total 99 08 86 193
Performance on this measure 65.98% 62.5% 72.09%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 195 00 00 195
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 195 00 00 195
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 195 00 00 195
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 195 00 00 195
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% NaN%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 368 94.85%
Satisfied 14 3.61%
Satisfied somewhat 04 1.03%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 02 0.52%
Total Surveyed 388
Response rate % 99.48%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 00
Hearing 00
Speech Communication 00
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 41
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00
Daily Living 00
Environmental Adaptations 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 00
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Device Demonstrations 41

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 00 00 00
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 00 00 00
Representatives of Education 00 00 00
Representatives of Employment 00 00 00
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 41 00 41
Representative of Community Living 00 00 00
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Total 41 00 41

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 00
Service Provider 00
Vendor 00
Repair Service 00
Others 03
Total 03

D. Anecdote

We provided device demonstrations of our telepresesence robot program to physical therapy and speech pathology students from Wilmington College and The Ohio State University.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 41 00 00 41
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 41 00 00 41
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 41 00 00 41
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 41 00 00 41
Performance on this measure 100% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 41 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 41
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 217 07 3,145 3,369
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 00 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 00 01 02
4. Subtotal 219 07 3,148 3,374
5. None of the above 02 00 02 04
6. Subtotal 221 07 3,150 3,378
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 221 07 3,150 3,378
9. Performance on this measure 98.64% 100% 99.9% 99.82%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 94 05 47 146
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 11 00 15 26
Subtotal 105 05 62 172
Have not made a decision 33 03 24 60
Subtotal 138 08 86 232
Nonrespondent 02 00 00 02
Total 140 08 86 234
Performance on this measure 76.09% 62.5% 72.09% 74.14%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 93.41% 95% Not Met
Response Rate 94.88% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 10
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 48
Representatives of Education 00
Representatives of Employment 00
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 26
Representatives of Community Living 00
Representatives of Technology 00
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 84

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
52 32 00 84

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 58
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 00
Transition 26
Total 84

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

We are sponsors of ongoing trainings conducted by the Prentke Romich Company out of Wooster, Ohio. They hold period trainings in the 4H Center on the campus of The Ohio State University. These trainings are attended by people with disabilities and family members and caregivers of persons who have purchased or will be purchasing PRC devices with LAMP on them.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Our public policy direcdtor is part of Ohio's Technology First Initiative, helping state programs better utilize assistive technology and technology services to incrase the employment rate for Ohioans with disabilities.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 00
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 00
Performance Measure Percentage NaN%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 30%
Employment 15%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 15%
Community Living 40%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

We continue to partner with the ARC of Central Ohio on ways to incorporate assistive technology services into day habilitation progras for adults with developmental disabilities. We are helping design a program where assistive technology is maximized to help them be more productive and have a more enjoyable experience.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Our public policy director is part of Ohio's Technology First Initiative, helping state programs better utilize assistive technology and technology service to increase the employment rate for Ohioans with disabilities.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. We were able to reach 7,780 people with opened emails through Constant Contact, our marketing and communication service. This this service, we disseminate information about new equipment added to our library, information about upcoming trainings and other resources, or general updates about our agency.

2. Our website, atohio.org, had 902 visitors in FY 23.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 414 225 639
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 377 187 564
Representative of Education 128 40 168
Representative of Employment 110 32 142
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 88 44 132
Representative of Community Living 47 15 62
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Unable to Categorize 100 100 200
Total 1,264 643 1,907

Referral Types:

We continue to work with county boards of developmental disabilities. We are partnering with them to help establish lending library and mini-demonstration programs at the county level, which have helped increase our numbers both direcdtly and indirectly.

Referral Sources:

Our referrals are positively impacted by our partnership with the Nisonger Center at The Ohio State University. In particular, our partnership and sponsorship of the statewide TechSummit conference generates referals for us from disability professionals across the state

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

We collaborate with the Nisonger Center at Ohio State to put on a statewide training called TechSummit.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The presentations included smart homes, off the shelf technology, new and developing technologies, as well as innovative ways technology was accessed in other staets. The collaboration is ongoing and is primarily focused on those who work in the Ohio developmental disabilities system.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Health;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; State Financing; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 01

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

We were able to utlize Constant Contact, our website, and the Ohio Disability Blog to help spread the word about issues affecdtinv Ohioans with disabilities. Any time we added a new device to our lending library, we would send a notice to over 4000 disability professionals and people with disabilities across the state.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

We are developing an online training program for each state agency that touches the lives of people with disabilities in the state. We hope to further the state Technology First Initiative by making sure all relevant state employees are knowledgable about the ways technology can positively impact the lives of Ohioans with disabilities.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Education


Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
State Appropriations$26,000Device LoanTrue
Amount: $26,000

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:12:34 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.