National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

New York 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
NYS TRAID Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.justicecenter.ny.gov/traid-program
Mailing Address:
401 State Street
City:
Schenectady
State:
NY
Zip Code:
12305
Program Email:
Melinda.Dolezal@justicecenter.ny.gov
Phone:
518-549-0220
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs
Mailing Address:
161 Delaware Avenue
City:
Delmar
State:
NY
Zip Code:
12054
Program URL:
https://www.justicecenter.ny.gov

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Dolezal, Melinda
Title:
TRAID Director
Phone:
518-549-0220
E-mail:
Melinda.Dolezal@Justicecenter.ny.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Miranda, Denise M.
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
518-549-0200
E-mail:
Denise.Miranda@JusticeCenter.ny.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program

2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)34
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)0
C. Total Served34

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures34

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber ProvidedTotal Estimated
Current Retail
Purchase Price
Total Price for
Which Devices
Were Sold
Savings
to Consumers
Vision 0$0$0$0
Hearing 0$0$0$0
Speech communication 24$2,495$0$2,495
Learning, cognition, and developmental 32$1,271$0$1,271
Mobility, seating and positioning 0$0$0$0
Daily living 69$700$0$700
Environmental adaptations 0$0$0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0$0$0
Computers and related 1$3$0$3
Recreation, sports, and leisure 0$0$0$0
Total 126$4,469$0$4,469


D. Anecdote

A woman visited her local TRAID Center to find a solution for her trackball, which did not appear to be working. The staff worked with her and noted that she put a lot of pressure on the trackball, which meant that sometimes she bushed the back of the device against the edge of her laptop. Even though the laptop had a Dycem underneath it, this caused an accidental push of the reset button on the device. The staff realized the trackball was fine, but in order to avoid similar issues from happening in the future, they designed and 3D printed a custom button block for the device to promote her success in using the device moving forward.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 00 01 06
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 19 00 02 21
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 04 00 00 04
4. Subtotal 28 00 03 31
5. None of the above 03 00 00 03
6. Subtotal 31 00 03 34
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 31 00 03 34
9. Performance on this measure 90.32% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 31 91.18%
Satisfied 03 8.82%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 34
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 08
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 2,171
C. Total 2,179

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 2,179

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 03 $275 $0 $275
Daily Living 06 $235 $0 $235
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 09 $510 $0 $510

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 70 $18,913 $0 $18,913
Hearing 28 $14,756 $0 $14,756
Speech Communication 56 $36,306 $0 $36,306
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 33 $7,552 $0 $7,552
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,380 $467,471 $0 $467,471
Daily Living 1,663 $164,160 $0 $164,160
Environmental Adaptations 96 $35,037 $0 $35,037
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 02 $12,900 $0 $12,900
Computers and Related 101 $36,178 $0 $36,178
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 32 $4,510 $0 $4,510
Total 3,461 $797,783 $0 $797,783

D. Anecdote

A Care Manager for a local children's therapy organization called TRAID about a family she had just started working with. She was searching for various items for a family with three small children that recently moved to the area. The staff suggested she visit the center to see some items that were available, as the Care Manager was not sure what kinds of assistive technology might work. After viewing a few items, the Care Manager asked about an adaptive high chair, as she thought the family could benefit from using it. Since the device was still in good shape and part of the reuse inventory, TRAID was able support the family even further and donated it for the family to keep.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 36 05 1,348 1,389
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 05 01 268 274
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 55 09 254 318
4. Subtotal 96 15 1,870 1,981
5. None of the above 10 04 175 189
6. Subtotal 106 19 2,045 2,170
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 09 09
8. Total 106 19 2,054 2,179
9. Performance on this measure 90.57% 78.95% 91.04%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,860 85.36%
Satisfied 264 12.12%
Satisfied somewhat 03 0.14%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.05%
Nonrespondent 51 2.34%
Total Surveyed 2,179
Response rate % 97.66%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 2,912
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 110
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 746
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 40
Total 3,808

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 2,590 728 3,318
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 194 75 269
Representative of Education 69 30 99
Representative of Employment 04 02 06
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 32 35 67
Representatives of Community Living 18 23 41
Representatives of Technology 05 03 08
Total 2,912 896 3,808

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 60

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 41 36 77
Hearing 24 07 31
Speech Communication 374 90 464
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 122 76 198
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,836 579 2,415
Daily Living 1,396 452 1,848
Environmental Adaptations 55 43 98
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 02 07 09
Computers and Related 121 181 302
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 49 15 64
Total 4,020 1,486 5,506

E. Anecdote

TRAID staff were contacted by an Employment Specialist looking for a device that could assist a woman she was working with at her place of employment. The woman needed assistance with reading lists and labels in a kitchen where she worked. The staff suggested a C-Pen Reader that was available. The Employment Specialist was able to work with the woman to try this device. The C-Pen Reader worked well for the woman, and was very helpful in allowing her to be successful and independent at work.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 224 13 2,490 2,727
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 28 02 41 71
Subtotal 252 15 2,531 2,798
Have not made a decision 19 04 43 66
Subtotal 271 19 2,574 2,864
Nonrespondent 25 00 23 48
Total 296 19 2,597 2,912
Performance on this measure 92.99% 78.95% 98.33%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 35 05 370 410
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 10 01 128 139
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 26 08 173 207
4. Subtotal 71 14 671 756
5. None of the above 13 04 97 114
6. Subtotal 84 18 768 870
7. Nonrespondent 10 01 15 26
8. Total 94 19 783 896
9. Performance on this measure 84.52% 77.78% 87.37%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 3,528 92.65%
Satisfied 201 5.28%
Satisfied somewhat 11 0.29%
Not at all satisfied 02 0.05%
Nonrespondent 66 1.73%
Total Surveyed 3,808
Response rate % 98.27%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 57
Hearing 07
Speech Communication 299
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 112
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 397
Daily Living 221
Environmental Adaptations 12
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 02
Computers and Related 51
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 08
Total # of Device Demonstrations 1,166

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 933 43 976
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 127 301 428
Representatives of Education 37 248 285
Representatives of Employment 02 02 04
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 41 120 161
Representative of Community Living 19 36 55
Representative of Technology 07 14 21
Total 1,166 764 1,930

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 108
Service Provider 02
Vendor 117
Repair Service 00
Others 04
Total 231

D. Anecdote

TRAID staff worked with the family of a little boy and his Speech Language Pathologist to identify some communication devices he might respond to. His communication background and needs were obtained, and the staff demonstrated a few devices and apps including Touch Chat and LAMP. In addition to trialing the different systems, the family needed support to learn to program the device. Multichat 15, set in the bilingual setting, was initially set up as he may need an English and Spanish profile for school as his instruction in school is in English. The TRAID staff showed the child’s team how to implement the program. The child responded well to using the program, and the family borrowed a device with Touch Chat, so their child could begin to use it at home. The TRAID staff also set up an appointment for the family to explore Ablenet benefits, as this was identified when the staff were assessing the family's needs.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 300 11 646 957
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 12 00 60 72
Subtotal 312 11 706 1,029
Have not made a decision 36 02 71 109
Subtotal 348 13 777 1,138
Nonrespondent 19 00 09 28
Total 367 13 786 1,166
Performance on this measure 85.01% 84.62% 89.82%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,747 90.52%
Satisfied 168 8.7%
Satisfied somewhat 03 0.16%
Not at all satisfied 04 0.21%
Nonrespondent 08 0.41%
Total 1,930
Response rate % 99.59%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 76 10 1,719 1,805
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 34 02 398 434
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 85 17 427 529
4. Subtotal 195 29 2,544 2,768
5. None of the above 26 08 272 306
6. Subtotal 221 37 2,816 3,074
7. Nonrespondent 10 01 24 35
8. Total 231 38 2,840 3,109
9. Performance on this measure 49.77% 32.43% 74.94% 72.62%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 524 24 3,136 3,684
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 40 02 101 143
Subtotal 564 26 3,237 3,827
Have not made a decision 55 06 114 175
Subtotal 619 32 3,351 4,002
Nonrespondent 44 00 32 76
Total 663 32 3,383 4,078
Performance on this measure 88.4% 81.25% 96.34% 94.96%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.69% 95% Met
Response Rate 98.43% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 1,585
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 1,176
Representatives of Education 1,992
Representatives of Employment 17
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 785
Representatives of Community Living 364
Representatives of Technology 58
Unable to Categorize 918
TOTAL 6,895

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
6,621 274 00 6,895

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 4,439
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 206
Combination of any/all of the above 1,992
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 71
Transition 187
Total 6,895

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

A training about TRAID and Assistive Technology, focusing on Early Intervention, was given to a group of Special Education majors at a student led group meeting for the Council of Exceptional Children at SUNY Plattsburgh. Education about assistive technology, the NYS TRAID Program, the Adirondack Regional Technology Center, grant funding for the program, and how to permanently acquire AT was provided to participants. Some in attendance had experience with AT due to classroom placements, but all stated they learned more about AT from this training. Participants were also able to use and educate themselves about a sampling of Early Intervention AT at this training, including adapted toys with switches, Alternative Augmentative Communication (AAC) devices, sensory items, and more.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Staff provided the training “Planning for the Transition from Early Intervention to Committee on Preschool Special Education for Families” for families in Nassau and Suffolk County. The goal of the training was to help families and caregivers better understand the transition process for EI aged children. This workshop helped attendees understand the transition process, be an active member of the transition team, understand the difference between services in Early Intervention and Committee on Preschool Special Education, and to understand the purpose of an Individualized Education Program. The staff also focused on how assistive technology can help with the transition, and how TRAID can help with questions.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

TRAID staff conducted a guest lecture for a class in the Industrial and Engineering Department on Human/Computer Interaction at the University at Buffalo. The lecture reviewed accessibility requirements, considerations developers should be aware of, and information about user interfaces. The focus of the lecture was about users who are employed and require accessible interfaces in order to complete their jobs. About 50 representatives of education and technology were present for this in-person lecture.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 00
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 56
No known outcome at this time 15
Nonrespondent 00
Total 71
Performance Measure Percentage 78.9%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 26%
Employment 00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 30%
Community Living 44%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

TRAID staff were contacted by a Person-Centered Community Advocate for Behavioral Health in their region. The advocate oversaw a local senior center, and someone had raised concerns about potential barriers to accessibility in the building. The TRAID staff visited the center, where they assessed the ramp leading into the center, and speedbumps outside. Both were in compliance with ADA guidelines. TRAID staff assessed the inside of the center for accessibility concerns. The biggest concern with this center is that its inside an old high school, so not all newer accessibility best practices were present. The TRAID staff noted the height of the sinks in the bathroom were too low, which made wheelchair users unable to maneuver a chair to be able to wash their hands. The staff planned would work with local code enforcement to obtain their assistance on options for making the site more accessible.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

TRAID staff worked with the Mount Vernon School district to address assistive technology needs across the district. The staff evaluated how the school implements AT and ongoing supports for students. TRAID staff met with the Special Education Coordinators from each school in the district to ensure that they knew how Individualized Education Plans should be written, so there was consistency between them. TRAID staff suggested an implementation system for Alternative Augmentative Communication (AAC) devices in the district. This included plans to recommend AAC for some students earlier, funding for equipment, and more room to train staff on how to implement AAC. The goal of this initiative is to help educators support their students communicate, and ultimately transition into more independent settings.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. TRAID staff participated in an event with Spin Master Toys to discuss the importance of accessibility. Organized by representatives from Tech OWL, the Pennsylvania Assistive Technology Program, the event highlighted how Spin Master could offer toys with built in switches, so children of all abilities could play while being introduced to assistive technology and learning cause and effect. Staff then demonstrated how they use 3D printed components and rewiring to make certain toys more accessible. Spin Master provided several dozen toys at the event, which were then adapted to be switch operated. Staff from TRAID, Tech OWL, and Spin Master spent the rest of the day soldering and sewing, and at the end of the event the toys were donated to children in New York.

2. The SCION Project is in its second year and results are still being measured. By having TRAID as a partner agency, the DRCs have had access to various training topics related to assistive technology that they would not have had otherwise. This partnership has increased knowledge of assistive technology resources in New York. It has built connections to resources across the state and has been successful so far, due to frequent communication and monthly check-ins for DRCs and partner agency staff. This has resulted in loans and trainings tailored to the needs of the program and participants. This initiative builds upon the work of four rounds of federal Disability Employment Initiative (DEI) pilot funding and the Disability Program Navigator before that. TRAID plans to keep working with the Department of Labor as the initiative continues.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 249 68 317
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 1,179 654 1,833
Representative of Education 1,999 323 2,322
Representative of Employment 75 00 75
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 581 90 671
Representative of Community Living 297 222 519
Representative of Technology 328 559 887
Unable to Categorize 11 04 15
Total 4,719 1,920 6,639

Referral Types:

In FFY 2022 the TRAID Centers provided outreach at local fairs, disability focused events like walk and rolls, job fairs, community events, and even events like the food focused Spedie Fest in Binghamton New York. Two of the TRAID Centers changed locations this year, and as a result they held open-houses and sent out updates to agencies and organizations throughout their region. The Justice Center TRAID Director has also participated in several committees such as the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Interagency Training & Accessibility Assistance Workgroup, the ACCES-VR state Rehabilitation Council, the Equipment Loan Fund, and more. Each of these organizations has created opportunities for outreach at partner agencies across New York.

Referral Sources:

The majority of referrals come from state partners with whom TRAID has Memorandums of Understanding as well as their network of agencies. These include the State Education Department (ACCES-VR) and the Department of Health (Early Intervention and Money Follows the Person.) There are 62 counties in NY, and each is covered by one of the twelve TRAID Centers. These MOUs require at least quarterly contact with partners in each TRAID region, such as vocational rehabilitation counselors and Early Intervention Officials. This contact allows TRAID Centers and partner agencies to collaborate on outreach ideas, devices to purchase, and training opportunities. Other referrals to TRAID include disability and aging related agencies like the Offices for the Aging and local schools/the State Education Department.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Justice Center and the TRAID Centers continued to collaborate with staff from the Department of Labor on the New York Systems Change and Inclusive Opportunities Network (SCION.) SCION's goal is to improve education, training and employment opportunities and outcomes for youth and adults with disabilities. SCION has worked to hire and train 33 new Disability Resource Coordinators (DRCs) to assist job seekers with disabilities. This includes providing feedback and voiceover for recorded Disability Resource Coordinator (DRC) trainings, assistance in SCION office hours, and resource sharing. After partnering with SCION in the previous year, connections with TRAID have increased, along with loans and requests for trainings on assistive technology for employment. Additional trainings have included reasonable accommodations, accessibility, and an overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The end goal of SCION is to support at least 45,000 individuals seeking employment by the project’s completion in 2026.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The SCION Project is in its second year and results are still being measured. By having TRAID as a partner agency, the DRCs have had access to various training topics related to assistive technology that they would not have had otherwise. This partnership has increased knowledge of assistive technology resources in New York. It has built connections to resources across the state and has been successful so far, due to frequent communication and monthly check-ins for DRCs and partner agency staff. This has resulted in loans and trainings tailored to the needs of the program and participants. This initiative builds upon the work of four rounds of federal Disability Employment Initiative (DEI) pilot funding and the Disability Program Navigator before that. TRAID plans to keep working with the Department of Labor as the initiative continues.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community);

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Public/State Agency$150,000TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$80,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$189,000ReuseTrue
Public/State Agency$50,000State FinancingTrue
Public/State Agency$200,000DemonstrationTrue
Public/State Agency$235,000Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$100,000Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Amount: $1,004,000

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:11:35 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.