Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 1,657 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 00 |
C. Total | 1,657 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,657 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $1,500 | $0 | $1,500 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 4,298 | $1,017,734 | $340,078 | $677,656 |
Daily Living | 1,957 | $154,923 | $51,641 | $103,282 |
Environmental Adaptations | 1,809 | $603,921 | $201,307 | $402,614 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 150 | $16,445 | $16,445 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 100 | $4,379 | $1,212 | $3,167 |
Total | 8,315 | $1,798,902 | $610,683 | $1,188,219 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Provided a discount on a specialized Joerns bed. This bed can be lowered to 7 inches from the floor allowing the consumer to increase independence.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 566 | 566 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 620 | 620 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 471 | 471 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,657 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,657 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,657 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,260 | 76.04% |
Satisfied | 393 | 23.72% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.24% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 1,657 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 116 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 22 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 04 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 06 |
Total | 148 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 37 | 32 | 69 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 09 | 00 | 09 |
Representative of Education | 39 | 00 | 39 |
Representative of Employment | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representatives of Community Living | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Representatives of Technology | 20 | 00 | 20 |
Total | 116 | 32 | 148 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Hearing | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Speech Communication | 61 | 00 | 61 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 32 | 00 | 32 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Daily Living | 08 | 00 | 08 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 169 | 32 | 201 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 281 | 32 | 313 |
A student and their school team borrowed an iPad and AAC app from the TLC. The trial was so successful that they asked to extend the loan while they wait for insurance funding to purchase their own device. An elementary student borrowed a Liftware Level spoon to work on feeding herself lunch more independently. Her team reported that the trial is going very well. A college student with a physical disability borrowed a Keymecher touchpad to use while accessing his Surface tablet mounted above him while laying in bed. This worked very well and he will be purchasing.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 31 | 18 | 22 | 71 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 09 | 03 | 04 | 16 |
Subtotal | 40 | 21 | 26 | 87 |
Have not made a decision | 21 | 03 | 03 | 27 |
Subtotal | 61 | 24 | 29 | 114 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 01 | 00 | 02 |
Total | 62 | 25 | 29 | 116 |
Performance on this measure | 65.57% | 87.5% | 89.66% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 32 | 00 | 00 | 32 |
6. Subtotal | 32 | 00 | 00 | 32 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 32 | 00 | 00 | 32 |
9. Performance on this measure | 0% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 111 | 75% |
Satisfied | 37 | 25% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 148 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 126 |
Hearing | 12 |
Speech Communication | 271 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 305 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 24 |
Daily Living | 129 |
Environmental Adaptations | 45 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 376 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 25 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 1,313 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 516 | 00 | 516 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 169 | 206 | 375 |
Representatives of Education | 364 | 200 | 564 |
Representatives of Employment | 38 | 00 | 38 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 109 | 00 | 109 |
Representative of Community Living | 89 | 00 | 89 |
Representative of Technology | 28 | 00 | 28 |
Total | 1,313 | 406 | 1,719 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 353 |
Service Provider | 169 |
Vendor | 389 |
Repair Service | 07 |
Others | 05 |
Total | 923 |
Demonstrated a Chromebook to a woman with a visual impairment who wants to write a memoir. She was very excited about using Google Docs, Google Drive, built-in voice recognition, built-in text-to-speech, and built-in zoom features to enable her to type/dictate, see the text enlarged, or hear it read back. She was also very excited to be able to do Google searches on a larger screen (she only had a smartphone).
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 485 | 54 | 321 | 860 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 11 | 02 | 25 | 38 |
Subtotal | 496 | 56 | 346 | 898 |
Have not made a decision | 242 | 17 | 61 | 320 |
Subtotal | 738 | 73 | 407 | 1,218 |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 03 | 87 | 95 |
Total | 743 | 76 | 494 | 1,313 |
Performance on this measure | 66.76% | 73.68% | 70.04% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,054 | 61.31% |
Satisfied | 129 | 7.5% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.12% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 534 | 31.06% |
Total | 1,719 | |
Response rate % | 68.94% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 566 | 566 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 620 | 620 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 471 | 471 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,657 |
5. None of the above | 32 | 00 | 00 | 32 |
6. Subtotal | 32 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,689 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 32 | 00 | 1,657 | 1,689 |
9. Performance on this measure | 0% | NaN% | 71.58% | 70.22% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 516 | 72 | 343 | 931 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 20 | 05 | 29 | 54 |
Subtotal | 536 | 77 | 372 | 985 |
Have not made a decision | 263 | 20 | 64 | 347 |
Subtotal | 799 | 97 | 436 | 1,332 |
Nonrespondent | 06 | 04 | 87 | 97 |
Total | 805 | 101 | 523 | 1,429 |
Performance on this measure | 66.67% | 77% | 71.13% | 69.03% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.80% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 84.85% | 90% | Not Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 119 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 130 |
Representatives of Education | 252 |
Representatives of Employment | 90 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 82 |
Representatives of Community Living | 40 |
Representatives of Technology | 25 |
Unable to Categorize | 4,638 |
TOTAL | 5,376 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
00 | 00 | 5,376 | 5,376 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 4,795 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 92 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 231 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 137 |
Transition | 121 |
Total | 5,376 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
A 2-day PODD training was held with a national PODD trainer-49 attendees, attendees left energized and ready and willing to try PODD with their students. Training was well received
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Did workshops on transistion for SPAN Parent Advocacy Network, NJ Youth Transistion on how to transition students from school to work, or college
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Held webinars and live sessions on captions,, alt text, how to do audio description. In addition, worked with NJ Court system on how to make their website more accessible.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 137 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 137 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 50% |
---|---|
Employment | 20% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 08% |
Community Living | 20% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 02% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Collaborated with a virtual group of Johnson & Wales University students who discussed their creative assistive technology solutions for their partners with disabilities on the Maker Roundtable. Students collaborated in groups, sharing ideas, and collectively, the Maker Roundtable provided recommendations and methods to improve or enhance the usability of the devices they had created for individuals with disabilities.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Worked with a young man with a disability, and a transition coordinator, with information about AT and how to incorpoate AT in employment.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Led the charge with a variety of activities for AT awareness day. Posted over 50 posts on social media, twitter, Facebook, tiktok, with videos, updated tech, posts about services, how AT benefits, etc. also created a virtual Jeopardy game (via Zoom) with over 100 participants that was well received.
2. This year we super sized Annual Assistive Technology Statewide Conference to a 2 day event with over 125 attendees. The key focus area was AT & Mental Health. We had a nationally recognized keynote speaker(Hillary Goldthwait-Fowles, Ph.D. ATP) for the topic. In addition, we had Apple Education there presenting 2 sessions, along with many other presenters presenting on AT (K-12 education, Higher Education, Workplace and Community Living) the conference was well received for all that attended
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 88 | 00 | 88 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 116 | 00 | 116 |
Representative of Education | 86 | 00 | 86 |
Representative of Employment | 42 | 00 | 42 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 17 | 00 | 17 |
Representative of Community Living | 588 | 00 | 588 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 937 | 00 | 937 |
Attended multiple outreach events throughout the year and one major one is the Abilities Expo which is a 3-day event in Edison each year and has over 1000 attendees. After the event people reach out to us to learn more about our services, especially the loan library. We have partnered with Rutgers, NJAAW and other agencies on a variety of webinars that has helped with our outreach efforts and increased referral and information results. We have also added a "Tech Spotlight webinar series which has added interest in our program especially the loan program, people are interested in the technology after seeing the webinar.
About 70% of the referrals we receive are from OT, speech therapist, special education teachers, and parents, from school districts throughout NJ looking for information on what type of AT may be good for their student/child Others information request are coming from their caregivers, individuals with disabilities DDD agency and other agencies
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Partnered with NJAWW (NJ Advocates for Aging well) Developed and implemented a webinar series that covered a variety of AT topics The first 15-20 minutes were an overview of the AT covered. It included a demo of one software/device, (a strong emphasis on that this technology is not the only technology that meets the need and may not be ideal for everyone) and stress there may be multiple steps in set-up to get it work for the individual. The remainder of the time will be discussion based and brainstorming of ideas and best practices on ways to introduce and train individuals, caregivers, relatives, etc of the devices/software. Resources will be provided that will help with the training and set-up of devices at home and in community settings. In addition, had a table at the NJAAW conference where we demo and handed out resources about the program, more than 100 people attended
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The webinars were well attended and the attendees were actively engaged with the content. Many have followed up with additional questions about the webinars
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Veterans;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $35,000 | Training | True |
Amount: $35,000 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:11:02 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)