Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 1883 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 971 |
C. Total Served | 2854 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2854 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 641 | $43,502 | $0 | $43,502 |
Hearing | 36 | $1,050 | $0 | $1,050 |
Speech communication | 164 | $4,152 | $0 | $4,152 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 124 | $5,057 | $0 | $5,057 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 29 | $5,670 | $0 | $5,670 |
Daily living | 614 | $19,389 | $0 | $19,389 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 70 | $506 | $0 | $506 |
Computers and related | 603 | $11,002 | $0 | $11,002 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 573 | $6,064 | $0 | $6,064 |
Total | 2854 | $96,392 | $0 | $96,392 |
A woman who experienced a stroke wanted to paint and sell her paintings but needed one handed solutions for opening up her tubes of paint and an adapted easel to hold her paintings in place while she painted. Both of these devices were fabricated for her.
A hands free mounting solution for a cell hope phone holder was created for a woman to be attached to her wheelchair so that she could easily call for help or conduct Facetime calls using her voice
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 1,468 | 150 | 1,236 | 2,854 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 1,468 | 150 | 1,236 | 2,854 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 1,468 | 150 | 1,236 | 2,854 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 1,468 | 150 | 1,236 | 2,854 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,802 | 98.18% |
Satisfied | 40 | 1.4% |
Satisfied somewhat | 08 | 0.28% |
Not at all satisfied | 04 | 0.14% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 2,854 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 1,130 |
C. Total | 1,130 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,130 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $310 | $0 | $310 |
Hearing | 05 | $122 | $0 | $122 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 907 | $193,803 | $39,178 | $154,625 |
Daily Living | 382 | $58,882 | $13,025 | $45,857 |
Environmental Adaptations | 254 | $30,644 | $7,241 | $23,403 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $100 | $5 | $95 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 16 | $800 | $195 | $605 |
Total | 1,568 | $284,661 | $59,644 | $225,017 |
A 62 year old woman came to the REM and needed a power wheelchair for her 82 year old father who she was caring for and who did not have insurance or the resources to purchase a chair. She started to cry when she found out that she could purchase a reused chair for 10% of the cost of a new wheelchair saving her thousands of dollars.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 01 | 806 | 809 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 55 | 56 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
4. Subtotal | 03 | 01 | 870 | 874 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 110 | 111 |
6. Subtotal | 04 | 01 | 980 | 985 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 145 | 145 |
8. Total | 04 | 01 | 1,125 | 1,130 |
9. Performance on this measure | 75% | 100% | 77.33% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 802 | 70.97% |
Satisfied | 43 | 3.81% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.18% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 283 | 25.04% |
Total Surveyed | 1,130 | |
Response rate % | 74.96% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 142 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 45 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 248 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 22 |
Total | 457 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 15 | 06 | 21 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 32 | 151 | 183 |
Representative of Education | 45 | 48 | 93 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 44 | 05 | 49 |
Representatives of Community Living | 03 | 104 | 107 |
Representatives of Technology | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Total | 142 | 315 | 457 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 35 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 12 | 08 | 20 |
Hearing | 12 | 09 | 21 |
Speech Communication | 49 | 19 | 68 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 34 | 27 | 61 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | 353 | 353 |
Daily Living | 08 | 31 | 39 |
Environmental Adaptations | 14 | 03 | 17 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 04 | 04 |
Computers and Related | 82 | 60 | 142 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 11 | 260 | 271 |
Total | 222 | 774 | 996 |
Strafford Learning Center shared an example of a school principle was thrilled to borrow a $3,500 digital magnifier for a student who was legally blind and after trying this device several times with the student, the team decided that the device would not be appropriate for the student and thus saving the school district over $3,500 by not purchasing a device that would end up in the closet and never used.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 52 | 01 | 21 | 74 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 02 | 08 | 14 |
Subtotal | 56 | 03 | 29 | 88 |
Have not made a decision | 16 | 00 | 02 | 18 |
Subtotal | 72 | 03 | 31 | 106 |
Nonrespondent | 31 | 00 | 05 | 36 |
Total | 103 | 03 | 36 | 142 |
Performance on this measure | 77.78% | 100% | 93.55% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 24 | 00 | 15 | 39 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 12 | 00 | 50 | 62 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 25 | 00 | 77 | 102 |
4. Subtotal | 61 | 00 | 142 | 203 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
6. Subtotal | 61 | 00 | 151 | 212 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 103 | 103 |
8. Total | 61 | 00 | 254 | 315 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 71.21% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 384 | 84.03% |
Satisfied | 64 | 14% |
Satisfied somewhat | 08 | 1.75% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.22% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 457 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 02 |
Hearing | 34 |
Speech Communication | 02 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 05 |
Daily Living | 09 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 06 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 87 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 146 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 94 | 146 | 240 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 16 | 51 | 67 |
Representatives of Education | 11 | 25 | 36 |
Representatives of Employment | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 15 | 59 | 74 |
Representative of Community Living | 06 | 43 | 49 |
Representative of Technology | 03 | 16 | 19 |
Total | 146 | 341 | 487 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 05 |
Service Provider | 247 |
Vendor | 59 |
Repair Service | 14 |
Others | 18 |
Total | 343 |
A lady with an executive function impairment was struggling to be able to keep her job. We demonstrated 6 different assistive technology solutions to help her focus including noise cancelling headset, vibrating apple watch and how to use specific feature on an iPhone such as reminders and short cuts to prompt her when a specific task needed to be completed in a specific location.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 02 | 01 | 93 | 96 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
Subtotal | 02 | 01 | 98 | 101 |
Have not made a decision | 06 | 00 | 25 | 31 |
Subtotal | 08 | 01 | 123 | 132 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 14 | 14 |
Total | 08 | 01 | 137 | 146 |
Performance on this measure | 25% | 100% | 71.53% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 393 | 80.7% |
Satisfied | 35 | 7.19% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.82% |
Not at all satisfied | 03 | 0.62% |
Nonrespondent | 52 | 10.68% |
Total | 487 | |
Response rate % | 89.32% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 26 | 01 | 821 | 848 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 1,481 | 150 | 1,341 | 2,972 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 25 | 00 | 86 | 111 |
4. Subtotal | 1,532 | 151 | 2,248 | 3,931 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 119 | 120 |
6. Subtotal | 1,533 | 151 | 2,367 | 4,051 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 248 | 248 |
8. Total | 1,533 | 151 | 2,615 | 4,299 |
9. Performance on this measure | 98.3% | 100% | 85.59% | 90.74% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 54 | 02 | 114 | 170 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 02 | 13 | 19 |
Subtotal | 58 | 04 | 127 | 189 |
Have not made a decision | 22 | 00 | 27 | 49 |
Subtotal | 80 | 04 | 154 | 238 |
Nonrespondent | 31 | 00 | 19 | 50 |
Total | 111 | 04 | 173 | 288 |
Performance on this measure | 72.5% | 100% | 75.6% | 75% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.35% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 93.20% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 389 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 200 |
Representatives of Education | 691 |
Representatives of Employment | 214 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 341 |
Representatives of Community Living | 00 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,835 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,325 | 510 | 00 | 1,835 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,206 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 45 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 300 |
Transition | 284 |
Total | 1,835 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
ATinNH chaired the national assistive technology maker’s day at ATIA Conference that was attended by over 300 people. As a result, ATinNH help people to make a total of 380 devices were made in These devices included, independent, living aids, cellphone holders, book holders, scan and read stations, dice launchers, and devices for recreation and relaxation.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
At the Age of Champions to promote the elderly returning home, a workshop was given on how ordinary items can be used to create assistive technology. Several caregivers attended and were helping their parents transition from a rehab facility following a stroke home and learned how to make several solutions for their parents. In addition they were able to take home devices for one handed use and give to their parents following this workshop.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
QR codes are appearing every where. They are at restaurants, on instructional materials, on brochures, business card etc. However until now people who are blind would never know that there is a QR code and even if they did know, they would not know how to orient their cell phone camera to capture the code for access to important information and electronic documents and resources. ATinNH created a solution on how to make this accessible by conducting a hands-on ICT workshops for making QR code dot makers to place a tactile dot under each QR Code on every business card, brochure, handout etc. Over 300 individuals participated in the QR code DOT making workshops and took home with them a hand held tactile dot maker to make all of their business cards and marketing materials accessible with QR codes on them, accessible for the Blind. The person who is blind, put one finger on the dot and pull the camera on their phone back until voice over captures the QR code.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 300 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 300 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 30% |
---|---|
Employment | 00% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 40% |
Community Living | 30% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
We assisted the occupational therapy department in developing their own assistive technology, device, demo and loan program. This includes recommending approximately 200 different devices for them to have in their library; photographing the devices; and creating resource sheets for students, and Public during assisted technology outreach activities.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
We partnered with the Department of Education Office of Vocational Rehabilitation to partner with four community colleges to offer assistive technology training for high school students transitioning to post secondary education. We developed a one hour training module that includes hands on interaction with assistive technology to increase educational success at the Community College level.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. We had a large exhibit of assistive technology at the Age of Champions conference that was attended by over 400 individuals. As a result, we were invited to do three more public awareness events at senior centers.
2. We had a large exhibit at the Family Support Conference for individuals with developmental disabilities. This was attended by over 500 individuals. As a result of this training, we noticed an uptick in requests for device demonstrations and loans from individuals with disabilities and family members.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 66 | 00 | 66 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Representative of Education | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 41 | 00 | 41 |
Representative of Community Living | 11 | 00 | 11 |
Representative of Technology | 14 | 00 | 14 |
Unable to Categorize | 22 | 00 | 22 |
Total | 166 | 00 | 166 |
By participating in the Department of Education Assistive Technology Fair the number of referrals that came from school districts increased.
Our referrals come from our website and our extensive assistive technology partners throughout New Hampshire who provide device demo and device reuse services; as well as our public awareness events at state and local conferences.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
We collaborated with the Department of Education support project for teachers of the visually impaired. The purpose of this collaboration was to increase access to devices that teachers can borrow for students with vision impairments. The teachers created a wish list of devices that they wanted to have immediate access to for loans to students to make appropriate decisions. We purchased over $20,000 in new devices for loans using carryover funding from the Gibney Foundation and using the state portion of the ATinNH Federal Grant from ACL.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
These devices are being managed by this sub group of the DOE that supports teachers of the visually impaired so that they could use these devices for both demonstrations and loans. In addition, one teacher of the visually impaired is recording all outcome data related to all of these devices. This has been a successful partnership.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
We established a new partnership with Future In Sight, which is a nonprofit that provides vision rehabilitation services for NH people of all ages who are blind or visually impaired. We developed a plan to transfer all vision related equipment to them, so that they are able to use the equipment to conduct demonstrations and loans.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Our partnership with Future In Sight has been successful. What made this new partnership successful is new, energetic, highly motivated and enthusiastic staff who really want to increase access to assistive technology for individuals with vision loss.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Community Participation and Integration;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $42,000 | Training | True |
Amount: $42,000 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We had several meetings and developed a detailed plan to conduct technical assistance training and support for individuals experiencing social isolation. We signed a contract with NH Partners for Health- However we were not successful at this time to implement many of the activities we had outlined due to changes in staff.
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:10:44 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)