Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 35 | 02 | 37 |
Approved Not made | 31 | 04 | 35 |
Rejected | 45 | 09 | 54 |
Total | 111 | 15 | 126 |
Lowest Income: | $10,488 | Highest Income: | $240,011 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$2,788,514 | 37 | $75,365 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 03 | 01 | 10 | 03 | 03 | 17 | 37 |
Percentage of Loans | 8.11% | 2.7% | 27.03% | 8.11% | 8.11% | 45.95% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 04 | 10.81% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 33 | 89.19% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 37 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 37 | $1,337,695 |
Total | 37 | $1,337,695 |
Lowest | 3% |
---|---|
Highest | 8.99% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
127 | 37 | 3.43135135135135% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 34 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 01 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 02 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 37 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $3,500 |
Daily living | 01 | $1,637 |
Environmental adaptations | 03 | $35,900 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 30 | $1,294,558 |
Computers and related | 02 | $2,100 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 37 | $1,337,695 |
Number Loans in default | 06 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $44,909 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 2 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 6 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
C. Total Served | 6 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 6 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily living | 6 | $85 | $0 | $85 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 6 | $85 | $0 | $85 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Cooperative Buying Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 158 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 3 |
C. Total Served | 161 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 72 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 89 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Items covered under IDEA
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 276 | $89,023 | $81,985 | $7,038 |
Hearing | 1 | $259 | $199 | $60 |
Speech communication | 451 | $72,954 | $64,812 | $8,142 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 353 | $48,462 | $43,247 | $5,215 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily living | 48 | $10,219 | $9,146 | $1,073 |
Environmental adaptations | 35 | $8,620 | $7,777 | $843 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 32 | $3,018 | $2,738 | $280 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 113 | $12,578 | $11,544 | $1,034 |
Total | 1309 | $245,133 | $221,448 | $23,685 |
In December 2022, Kristin's adaptive shower chair was showing major signs of wear and tear and could not be fixed safely. To get a new one through medical assistance would take months, so how would Kristin take a shower during that time? With the help of AT Discount Sales and Services LLC the family was able to purchase a new chair in a timely manner. AT Discount Sales (the Maryland cooperative buying program) saved them $479.50, enabling Kristin to continue getting the safe complete hygiene care needed.
In August 2023, Ms. R applied to the AT Financial Loan Program, requesting $25,000 for the purchase of a non-adapted vehicle. Mr. R. had a diagnosis of Chronic Arthritis, and now faced a new transportation challenge with her job, as it had newly relocated to Columbia MD, from Beltsville MD. She had previously been utilizing Metro Access to get back and forth to work but with the relocation to Columbia, Metro Access wasn't an option anymore because it didn't service the Columbia area. Having experienced credit issues related to a job loss 4 years earlier (though now working at her current position for 3 years), she was unable to qualify for a traditional loan. Thus, she applied to the ATLP. In working with staff, the program was able to show a previous history of on time credit payments up until her job loss, and Ms. R verified her work with a credit repair company to address the remaining collections on her credit report. The ATLP Board approved her loan based on current employment income and previous credit history, and she was able to secure a 3% interest financial loan for a 2019 used Mazda, ensuring reliable transportation to work and helping her to re-establish good credit history.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 06 | 77 | 24 | 107 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 02 | 06 | 09 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 07 | 79 | 34 | 120 |
5. None of the above | 02 | 00 | 01 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 09 | 79 | 35 | 123 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
8. Total | 09 | 79 | 44 | 132 |
9. Performance on this measure | 77.78% | 100% | 77.27% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 167 | 81.86% |
Satisfied | 27 | 13.24% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.49% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 09 | 4.41% |
Total Surveyed | 204 | |
Response rate % | 95.59% |
In August FY23, MDTAP launched its 3D Printing Fabrication Program, as reflected in the new data set for AT fabrication in State Financing. In FY23, the AT Financial Loan Program received a grant from ACL to expand lending parameters for adapted (and non adapted) vehicle loans, reflecting an increase in vehicle loans in the ATLP portfolio.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 497 |
C. Total | 497 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 02 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 495 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Items obligated under IDEA
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 11 | $16,592 | $0 | $16,592 |
Hearing | 11 | $6,693 | $0 | $6,693 |
Speech Communication | 09 | $54,283 | $0 | $54,283 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 | $22,450 | $0 | $22,450 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 878 | $1,256,795 | $0 | $1,256,795 |
Daily Living | 02 | $148 | $0 | $148 |
Environmental Adaptations | 02 | $4,500 | $0 | $4,500 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 18 | $13,550 | $0 | $13,550 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | $10,300 | $0 | $10,300 |
Total | 953 | $1,385,311 | $0 | $1,385,311 |
In August 2023, a Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) reached out on behalf of Ms. H, who qualified as under-housed and was living at the Helping Up Mission for the next year. The SLP was working with Ms. H while living at the shelter and had noted that Ms. H needed a tablet to continue speech and language sessions virtually, since she was not able to attend in-person, or complete the assignments the SLP assigned between sessions. The SLP also noted that the tablet would help Ms. H with general communication skills as she built on her current work. Because a tablet would not be covered through MA, the SLP contacted the Maryland High-tech AT Reuse program to inquire if there were any used tablets available. Having just received a newly donated tablet in July, we provided the device free-of-charge. The SLP loaded a free communication app on the tablet and provided the device to Ms. H. She has since been able to continue her sessions and build on her communication capabilities.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 00 | 490 | 494 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 04 | 00 | 490 | 494 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 04 | 00 | 490 | 494 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
8. Total | 05 | 00 | 490 | 495 |
9. Performance on this measure | 80% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 494 | 99.4% |
Satisfied | 03 | 0.6% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 497 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 188 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 07 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 08 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 07 |
Total | 210 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 94 | 11 | 105 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 43 | 02 | 45 |
Representative of Education | 14 | 02 | 16 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 17 | 03 | 20 |
Representatives of Community Living | 14 | 02 | 16 |
Representatives of Technology | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Total | 188 | 22 | 210 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 113 | 03 | 116 |
Hearing | 17 | 02 | 19 |
Speech Communication | 89 | 04 | 93 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 11 | 01 | 12 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Daily Living | 52 | 06 | 58 |
Environmental Adaptations | 39 | 08 | 47 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Computers and Related | 52 | 09 | 61 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 20 | 02 | 22 |
Total | 397 | 35 | 432 |
MDTAP client, Waverly, suffered a brain injury (HIE) at birth, which resulted in many medical challenges and disabilities. She is now 18 months old and struggles greatly with her movement abilities due to cerebral palsy. This has been a huge frustration for her—she cannot play with many typical toys as she does not have the strength or dexterity to work them. MDTAP loaned Waverly a switch adapted Sloth and Peek-A-Boo Bear. “Having the ability to borrow switch toys has been so beneficial for her. She can now easily activate and play with her toys which brings her a lot of joy. It’s so nice to see her smile after she is able to push the button and watch her toy activate. We really appreciate being able to borrow these items, as raising a child like this takes an incredible toll on every aspect of your life—physical, emotional, mental, and financial—easing this burden in any way is greatly appreciated by our family, which is what these toys have provided, so thank you!”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 19 | 06 | 110 | 135 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
Subtotal | 20 | 06 | 113 | 139 |
Have not made a decision | 05 | 00 | 43 | 48 |
Subtotal | 25 | 06 | 156 | 187 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 25 | 06 | 157 | 188 |
Performance on this measure | 80% | 100% | 72.44% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 10 | 11 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 13 | 15 |
5. None of the above | 04 | 00 | 03 | 07 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 01 | 16 | 22 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 05 | 01 | 16 | 22 |
9. Performance on this measure | 20% | 100% | 81.25% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 161 | 76.67% |
Satisfied | 47 | 22.38% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.48% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.48% |
Total Surveyed | 210 | |
Response rate % | 99.52% |
MDTAP continued to offer expanded access to device loans by offering shipping as an option for loan recipients, including postage paid return labels for all devices mailed out. By shipping devices to consumers borrowing equipment, the program has observed that this is a highly desirable perk of the lending library and continues to receive requests for items to be shipped, as opposed to requiring in-person device pickups and returns.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 67 |
Hearing | 13 |
Speech Communication | 45 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 09 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 05 |
Daily Living | 24 |
Environmental Adaptations | 09 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 18 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 197 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 103 | 07 | 110 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 52 | 16 | 68 |
Representatives of Education | 08 | 00 | 08 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 15 | 00 | 15 |
Representative of Community Living | 15 | 01 | 16 |
Representative of Technology | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 197 | 24 | 221 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 15 |
Service Provider | 08 |
Vendor | 01 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 10 |
Total | 34 |
In September 2023, MDTAP's AT Clinician (who is also an OT) was contacted by Ms. A, a current student at Coppin State University. Ms. A has paraplegia and was in need of a number of AT supports, including a laptop for school, exploring adapted mice, and seeking ideas for a modified work/study space. Our AT Clinician was able to identify & provide a free donated laptop through our High-tech AT Reuse program, and then met with Ms. A in our AT Library to demonstrate a variety of workstation modifications, including the lift desk, and a variety of adapted mice to go along with her laptop. The wrap-around approach to our service delivery ensured she had a working laptop for school, a variety of computer mice to try out, and a better sense of modifications that could be made to her work space at home to accommodate her physical needs.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 31 | 10 | 109 | 150 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 01 | 05 | 08 |
Subtotal | 33 | 11 | 114 | 158 |
Have not made a decision | 03 | 01 | 35 | 39 |
Subtotal | 36 | 12 | 149 | 197 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 36 | 12 | 149 | 197 |
Performance on this measure | 91.67% | 91.67% | 76.51% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 180 | 81.45% |
Satisfied | 37 | 16.74% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 1.81% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 221 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 10 | 78 | 524 | 612 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 02 | 07 | 11 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
4. Subtotal | 12 | 80 | 537 | 629 |
5. None of the above | 06 | 00 | 04 | 10 |
6. Subtotal | 18 | 80 | 541 | 639 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 09 | 10 |
8. Total | 19 | 80 | 550 | 649 |
9. Performance on this measure | 63.16% | 100% | 96.55% | 95.99% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 50 | 16 | 219 | 285 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 01 | 08 | 12 |
Subtotal | 53 | 17 | 227 | 297 |
Have not made a decision | 08 | 01 | 78 | 87 |
Subtotal | 61 | 18 | 305 | 384 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 61 | 18 | 306 | 385 |
Performance on this measure | 86.89% | 94.44% | 74.43% | 77.34% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.47% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.12% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 344 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 70 |
Representatives of Education | 204 |
Representatives of Employment | 83 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 61 |
Representatives of Community Living | 102 |
Representatives of Technology | 112 |
Unable to Categorize | 381 |
TOTAL | 1,357 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
957 | 118 | 282 | 1,357 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 103 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 32 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 318 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 802 |
Transition | 102 |
Total | 1,357 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
In February 2023, MDTAP hosted a training session on AT for Symptoms of Long Covid. This training was co-hosted by MDTAP's AT Clinician and MDTAP's AT & Public Health Coordinator. The session delved into AT solutions to help combat symptoms of long-COVID. From brain fog to muscle weakness, TAP staff discussed long-covid as defined by the CDC, coverages of long-covid under ADA, and a variety of technology options including health monitoring, medication reminders, memory aids, notetaking devices, and more. Other topics in this session included TAP services, CDC recommendations, and other state programs that can provide additional supports and treatments. There were 36 attendees - each received a copy of the slidedeck with hyperlinks and an additional resource document highlighting a variety of AT solutions.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
In September 2023, MDTAP hosted a training "From Highschool to Beyond: Assistive Technology In the Transition Process." This intensive training was presented by the TAP Executive Director and covered topics including AT access through the IEP, funding options that would allow students to maintain access to the AT through the transition (APH funding), the MDTAP AT in Transition Checklist now incorporated into the statewide Transition Guide, ways to access AT through transition programs (DSS offices in higher education, vocational rehab, DDA/waiver services, and Department of Labor programs), as well as ways to access AT for students who would not be utilizing any post-school programs or services. The session covered the services through MDTAP and our reuse program, as well as access to telecommunications and iPads through the state telecommunications program. 79 attendees received training and a copy of the slidedeck with links to all resources explored during the session.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
The IT Access Initiative conducted a high-impact training for the new Governor’s communications staff in July. The training was titled “Social Media Accessibility Training” and was attended by a team of four people. The session covered how to write good alternate text, how to provide descriptions for complex images such as infographics, proper captioning and audio description for recorded videos, and a checklist of necessities for press releases. This training showed marked impact on the new Governor’s various social media feeds which have begun incorporating the needed accessibility practices, as well as the Executive Orders issued by the Governor's Office, so that all Marylanders receive the same helpful information. One team member noted, “Thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. It's apparent there are multiple facets of accessibility we've been missing out on that need to be addressed." The ITAI team will continue to follow up with Governor staff training as a refresher.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 151 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 146 |
No known outcome at this time | 215 |
Nonrespondent | 290 |
Total | 802 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 37% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
MDTAP continued to offer highly customized AT and ICT trainings in FY23, with a focus on new, emerging, and relevant topics. We also collaborated with our partner organizations to increase marketing of all events, leading to greater attendance numbers in our trainings.
Education | 57% |
---|---|
Employment | 00% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 43% |
Community Living | 00% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
In July, 2023, MDTAP’s AT & Public Health Coordinator collaborated with the Director of Emergency Preparedness and the Director of the Maryland Accessible Telecommunications Program to develop and present an in-person training for 911 operators on alternative means of contacting 911 used by people with disabilities. Our Public Health Coordinator provided training on Assistive Technology devices that people use to interface with 911, and alternative emergency alerting systems, including live demonstrations and offering hands-on experience with the equipment. This training was developed to impact internal policies and practices within the state and will be used as a national model for other states to replicate. There were 150 registered attendees, including the lieutenant governor and other state leadership representatives.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
In January 2023, MDTAP's ED joined the Maryland State Agency Transition Collaborative, meeting with other state agencies monthly to discuss relevant improvements to the state transition services for students moving from high school into post-high school services. Out of this collaboration, MDTAP created the Assistive Technology Transition Checklist, available on the TAP website and distributed at Transition Fairs; included the checklist and related AT services in the newly revised Maryland Transition Guide, available through MSDE to all LEAs. Additionally, this partnership and coordination has led to further invitations to meet with and present at the statewide transition steering committees, and he development of a comprehensive training focused on AT in the Transition process. This training been offered once broadly and once as a custom session for Maryland School for the Blind.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. MDTAP staff provided a presentation to the Maryland Department of Veterans Affairs, Veteran Readiness & Employment Team. The presentation focused on AT services & programs in the state, and highlighted various assistive technology solutions that can be implemented in the workplace. 22 Veterans Services Administrators and service providers attended, learning about TAP services, ways to access AT across the state, funding streams, libraries, and a deep dive into various workplace AT solutions to build confidence and competence in the workplace, regardless of disability. This presentation led to additional AT information being disseminated in the VA quarterly newsletter and direct constituent referrals for consultations, demo, and loan.
2. Two MDTAP staff provided presentations at the national ATIA conference. The topics included "AT to Combat Social Isolation" and "Establishing an AT Reuse Program." Both sessions were offered as hybrid (in person and online), well attended with approximately 150 attendees at each, garnered additional insight and inquiries, (including national award for one of our speakers - Joy Zabala award), and covered information specific to Maryland's AT services as well as national best practices.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 134 | 160 | 294 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 113 | 65 | 178 |
Representative of Education | 59 | 160 | 219 |
Representative of Employment | 17 | 163 | 180 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 43 | 20 | 63 |
Representative of Community Living | 76 | 41 | 117 |
Representative of Technology | 08 | 01 | 09 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 450 | 610 | 1,060 |
The Assistive Technology Financial Loan Program (ATLP) implemented new strategies in FY23 to increase awareness of AT funding, including establishing outreach partnerships with the 3 regional Centers for Independent Living across the state (Western MD, Southern Maryland, and the Eastern Shore). These partnerships included monthly data tracking from the CILs, development of customized materials for the regions and increased meetings, presentations, and social media posts regarding the AT Financial Loan Program. Additionally, the ATLP developed and published the Maryland Funding Adapted Vehicles Guide, and coordinated with all related vendors and assessment programs to ensure they had the guide and appropriate materials to refer consumers to the ATLP. This increased the number of direct I&A inquiries coming into the program.
We work closely with the state developmental disabilities administration (DDA) and have supported their launch of the Technology First State. As a result, we saw increased referrals from CCSs and provider agencies as it related to AT consultations, demonstrations, and loans. Our increased partnership & library development with all 7 CILs across the state also resulted in additional referrals for demonstrations & loans.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
In January 2023, MDTAP established a collaboration project with University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC) focused on 3D printing of assistive technology devices. MDTAP established a small 3D printing lab in its main office, and has worked with UMBC's 3D printing lab to create a catalog of frequently used AT devices & online request form that can be easily printed from our space. Through our partnership with UMBC, they have provided additional training to TAP staff on developing customized fabrication prints, and have supported staff with increased capacity and access to their printers & student services when needed. This collaboration has allowed us to officially launch our 3D fabrication program, printing devices free-of-charge for constituents.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
This initiative is newly launched and we continue to explore ways to expand the partnership with UMBC and their 3D printing program to build AT awareness amongst their students who currently create & print devices. Our intent is to continue offering this service, expanding our printing abilities (with the support of students who understand how to create customized prints) for people with custom device needs, and develop an AT awareness curriculum for new 3D printing students at UMBC.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
State Financing; Information & Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
MDTAP worked closely with the Maryland Department of Labor, the MD Department of Disabilities Director of Employment, and the National Federation of the Blind to conduct a consumer needs assessment regarding appropriate employment services & referrals for people with disabilities seeking services in all of Maryland's American Job Centers (AJC). Through this assessment, we identified key referral needs for consumers and collaborated on the creation on a mandatory AJC staff training focused on disability etiquette and appropriate services and recommendations. The training covers how to support someone with a disability at the AJC, when to incorporate AT as a part of the job search process, and how to make referrals beyond just sending someone to the vocational rehabilitation waitlist.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
The final version of the AJC training is currently under review by the leadership at the MD Department of Labor. Once final approval is issued, the training will be posted on the HUB (the Maryland state employee training portal) and made mandatory for all employees under Department of Labor's American Job Centers. The ultimate intent is to improve referrals for people with disabilities and increase instances where employees are served with accommodations as opposed to sending them directly to vocational rehabilitation. A copy of the standard training can be provided by Kristen Patterson, Disability and Youth Services Coordinator, kristen.patterson@maryland.gov.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Employment
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $54,435 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $10,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Amount: $64,435 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:07:34 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)