Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 16 | 05 | 21 |
Approved Not made | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Rejected | 13 | 03 | 16 |
Total | 31 | 08 | 39 |
Lowest Income: | $8,772 | Highest Income: | $55,440 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$424,520 | 21 | $20,215 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 09 | 09 | 02 | 01 | 00 | 00 | 21 |
Percentage of Loans | 42.86% | 42.86% | 9.52% | 4.76% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 21 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 21 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 21 | $60,948 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 21 | $60,948 |
Lowest | 0% |
---|---|
Highest | 8% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
82 | 21 | 3.9047619047619% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 07 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 02 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 08 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 04 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 21 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 02 | $5,765 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $10,206 |
Daily living | 02 | $4,414 |
Environmental adaptations | 06 | $9,295 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 07 | $31,268 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 21 | $60,948 |
Number Loans in default | 02 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $2,673 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
An individual reached out to Able Up Iowa, the state financing service, to replace a deck and stairs for their home causing inaccessibility to the home. The program was able to support the implementation of a replacement deck, platform, and ramp to not only replace the previous entrance but enhance the accessibility.
Able Up Iowa was able to support an Iowan with a mobility limitation due to disability by providing funding toward the purchase of a lift chair. This allows the individual to independently sit and stand up without the need for support, enhancing their safety and independence.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 19 | 21 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 19 | 21 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 19 | 21 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 02 | 19 | 21 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 13 | 61.9% |
Satisfied | 02 | 9.52% |
Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 23.81% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 4.76% |
Total Surveyed | 21 | |
Response rate % | 95.24% |
The one individual who was "nonrespondent" expressed that they were tired after signing other documentation.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 294 |
C. Total | 294 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 294 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 10 | $40,000 | $1,250 | $38,750 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 152 | $169,710 | $6,945 | $162,765 |
Daily Living | 144 | $149,153 | $6,680 | $142,473 |
Environmental Adaptations | 112 | $94,315 | $3,600 | $90,715 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $250 | $20 | $230 |
Total | 419 | $453,428 | $18,495 | $434,933 |
The Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program was awarded an ARPA grant to support Iowans with disabilities, with special considerations going to those on the Home and Community Based Services Waiver through Medicaid, in obtaining long-term loan access to smart-technology assistive technology for tasks of daily living. Jeffrey, an individual with vision loss and bilateral upper extremity amputation, received the ARPA grant support through ESI ATP. Program staff consulted with Jeffrey to narrow his needs for smart tech for daily living and identified that Jeffrey needed more independent access to his microwave and laptop. Jeffrey experienced difficulty touching buttons, seeing the correct time and power level on the microwave, and difficulties opening the microwave due to the style of the lever mechanism. Jeffrey experienced difficulty with the built-in microphone functions and keyboard on his laptop. Through in-person and phone consultation an Echo Dot and Panasonic Smart Microwave were identified along with a SpeechWare microphone and Low-Vision keyboard for his laptop needs.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 08 | 00 | 226 | 234 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 28 | 29 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 14 | 16 |
4. Subtotal | 10 | 01 | 268 | 279 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 14 | 15 |
6. Subtotal | 11 | 01 | 282 | 294 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 11 | 01 | 282 | 294 |
9. Performance on this measure | 90.91% | 100% | 95.04% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 267 | 90.82% |
Satisfied | 27 | 9.18% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 294 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 194 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 01 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 33 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 37 |
Total | 265 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 96 | 15 | 111 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 25 | 04 | 29 |
Representative of Education | 06 | 06 | 12 |
Representative of Employment | 16 | 03 | 19 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 25 | 05 | 30 |
Representatives of Community Living | 11 | 06 | 17 |
Representatives of Technology | 15 | 32 | 47 |
Total | 194 | 71 | 265 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 35 | 26 | 61 |
Hearing | 09 | 18 | 27 |
Speech Communication | 07 | 09 | 16 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 65 | 85 | 150 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 15 | 06 | 21 |
Daily Living | 95 | 134 | 229 |
Environmental Adaptations | 12 | 04 | 16 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 | 06 | 07 |
Computers and Related | 140 | 107 | 247 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 11 | 52 | 63 |
Total | 390 | 447 | 837 |
Amberlin was referred to the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program by Iowa Vocational Rehabilitation Services. Amberlin experienced a brain injury resulting in memory complications. Amberlin desired to identify Assistive Technology that would support their memory recall, organization, and business coordination. Amberlin borrowed an iPad, Samsung Galaxy watch, Apple Watch, and Air Tags. Additionally, they trialed a multitude of organization and calendar applications and determined that an Apple Watch was very helpful in finding the Air Tags attached to their purse, keys, and other items commonly misplaced. Amberlin also appreciated the ease of using an iPad to enlarge text or use Speech-to-Text functions for emails and social media posts for their business. An Apple Pencil was also identified as an appropriate assistive technology support, along with Amber-Light blocking glasses but were not borrowed. Amberlin continues to adjust her assistive technology needs but has found success and satisfaction for pursuing their employment goals.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 30 | 40 | 99 | 169 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 20 | 21 |
Subtotal | 30 | 41 | 119 | 190 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 30 | 41 | 120 | 191 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
Total | 30 | 41 | 123 | 194 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.17% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 04 | 18 | 25 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 06 | 24 | 36 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 07 | 07 |
4. Subtotal | 09 | 10 | 49 | 68 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 09 | 10 | 50 | 69 |
7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 00 | 00 | 02 |
8. Total | 11 | 10 | 50 | 71 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 98% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 206 | 77.74% |
Satisfied | 29 | 10.94% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.75% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 28 | 10.57% |
Total Surveyed | 265 | |
Response rate % | 89.43% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 19 |
Hearing | 04 |
Speech Communication | 04 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 30 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 |
Daily Living | 48 |
Environmental Adaptations | 11 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
Computers and Related | 83 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 09 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 218 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 149 | 172 | 321 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 13 | 67 | 80 |
Representatives of Education | 05 | 07 | 12 |
Representatives of Employment | 18 | 65 | 83 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 19 | 72 | 91 |
Representative of Community Living | 10 | 33 | 43 |
Representative of Technology | 04 | 37 | 41 |
Total | 218 | 453 | 671 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 14 |
Service Provider | 11 |
Vendor | 188 |
Repair Service | 04 |
Others | 16 |
Total | 233 |
Marold is an individual diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis who lives in a rural area of Iowa. He uses a power wheelchair to navigate around his home. After a recent relapse, he experiences a decline in the dexterity of his fingers and wrists along with tremors. This caused him to contact the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program for support when trying to lock and unlock his front door. He also reported difficulty operating light switches inside his home. ESI ATP team members demonstrated a variety of smart locks, Alexa and Echo smart-home hubs, smart bulbs, and smart switches that are hub-enabled. After demonstration and discussion, Marold was able to report that a finger-print sensor-enabled keypad and deadbolt would meet his needs for his door locks, and smart-switches with an Echo would be sufficient with the aid of a newer version of iPad. A referral was made for funding resources.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 14 | 40 | 137 | 191 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
Subtotal | 15 | 40 | 150 | 205 |
Have not made a decision | 02 | 03 | 08 | 13 |
Subtotal | 17 | 43 | 158 | 218 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 17 | 43 | 158 | 218 |
Performance on this measure | 88.24% | 93.02% | 94.94% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 570 | 84.95% |
Satisfied | 101 | 15.05% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 671 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 11 | 06 | 263 | 280 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 07 | 52 | 65 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 21 | 23 |
4. Subtotal | 19 | 13 | 336 | 368 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 15 | 16 |
6. Subtotal | 20 | 13 | 351 | 384 |
7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 00 | 00 | 02 |
8. Total | 22 | 13 | 351 | 386 |
9. Performance on this measure | 85% | 100% | 89.74% | 89.84% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 44 | 80 | 236 | 360 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 01 | 33 | 35 |
Subtotal | 45 | 81 | 269 | 395 |
Have not made a decision | 02 | 03 | 09 | 14 |
Subtotal | 47 | 84 | 278 | 409 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
Total | 47 | 84 | 281 | 412 |
Performance on this measure | 95.74% | 96.43% | 96.76% | 96.58% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.43% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 97.68% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 133 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 11 |
Representatives of Education | 77 |
Representatives of Employment | 250 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 485 |
Representatives of Community Living | 604 |
Representatives of Technology | 04 |
Unable to Categorize | 159 |
TOTAL | 1,723 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,504 | 201 | 18 | 1,723 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,657 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 23 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 42 |
Transition | 01 |
Total | 1,723 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program entered into an agreement with Hope Haven, a non-profit organization that provides opportunities for persons with disabilities. Hope Haven received ARPA funding to assist their clients with Smart-Technology and contacted ESI ATP for training and support. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program team members trained Hope Haven leadership within the Hope Haven organization on AT 101, Smart-Technology for daily living, Electronic Aids to Daily Living (EADLs), and end-user-centered consultation process. A high satisfaction was received along with a discussion on how the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program can support teh needs o Hope Haven consumers on an individual basis.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa worked with the Waukee Community School District APEX program. The APEX program supports juniors and seniors in high school to work directly with an organization or business to explore various career tracks through hands-on experiences. Easterseals worked with four APEX students who are entering various undergraduate engineering fields of study in the Fall of 2023. Easterseals team members worked with the students to provide training on how engineering design can and should include persons with disabilities. The students designed various devices for an individual with co-occurring vision loss and bilateral upper extremity amputation. Additionally, Easterseals team members provided an overview to the over 150 students enrolled regarding inclusion and equity for individuals with disabilities in any and all career choices.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program identified a need for a basic introduction and more easily accessed Information and Communication Technology training support. ESI ATP team members began the tedious venture to evaluate, refine, and create a fully inclusive and accessible mode of education for the general public to comprehend the impact and basic "how-to" for ICT. Module 1 of the new ICT course was made 'live' in September of 2023, which generates inclusivity and ease of access for ICT.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 01 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 41 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 42 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 05% |
---|---|
Employment | 15% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 50% |
Community Living | 25% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 05% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program provided technical assistance to Iowa State University Extension, 4-H, and Cultivating Hope Farms to revise their required 4-H forms to be more accessible. This included but was not limited to providing feedback on using PEC and visuals for students who are non-readers, along with providing in large font, other alternative formats, and at a sixth-grade reading level to accommodate both the children in the 4-H group but also recognizing that parents/guardians and 4-H Leaders can also include individuals with disabilities who may benefit from accessible forms and documents. Providing ideas on how to use fidgets and other sensory aides during the monthly 4-H meetings, along with ideas on assistive technology to assist with transitioning from one activity to the next.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program met with Drake University Rehabilitation Counseling Master’s Program, and Rehabilitation Services Administration Scholarship Advisory Board to discuss how the program could implement more assistive technology training in the curriculum. We reviewed the required courses and how AT could be included in various courses as there are not any options for additional elective courses in the required curriculum. Drake University is one of two RSA-funded programs in the state of Iowa. Easterseals Iowa presents on the Assistive Technology Center every semester in various classes and students are required to complete the online ICT course in one of the mandatory classes.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program hosted the first sensory room at the 2023 Make Your Mark conference hosted by the Iowa Developmental Disabilities Council (DD Council). This conference is geared toward Iowans with disabilities, with a focus on transition age, who desire to be more involved with advocacy, along with their parents, guardians, and team. Easterseals Iowa coordinated services to meet the needs of participants and offered a variety of sensory assistive technology tools for attendees to utilize while sitting in the two-daylong conference, to enhance an inclusive environment for all participants. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program also set up a sensory room to demonstrate various assistive technology devices, including fidgets and noise-reduction tools, to attendees. These tools were then offered to attendees for use within sessions.
2. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program implemented a structured outreach and awareness plan for over 350 entities across the state of Iowa. These entities consisted of organizations, county services, transitional services, refugee services, and other rural services that may touch the lives of individuals with disabilities. ESI ATP team members reached out through phone or email communication and offered brochures and other program supplies for the entity to keep on hand. An offer of an onsite meeting and presentation was also discussed with some entities resulting in a schedule of additional activities.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 661 | 156 | 817 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 401 | 155 | 556 |
Representative of Education | 57 | 24 | 81 |
Representative of Employment | 198 | 136 | 334 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 251 | 02 | 253 |
Representative of Community Living | 234 | 38 | 272 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 1,803 | 511 | 2,314 |
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program purposes to put the end-user or person with a disability or special need as the expert of an assistive technology service. ESI ATP collaborates with the Developmental Disabilities Council (DD Council), presents to support groups statewide, and encourages 'word-of-mouth' referrals. This was reflected in our data with 35% of our referrals being individuals with disabilities. The next highest group is guardians and authorized representatives at 24% of our referrals. We will continue to emphasize this as an ideal scenario and aim to increase the number of end-users receiving Information and Assistance.
Approximately 24% of our referrals came from past Assistive Technology Program clients and another 12% came from online resources including the AT website. This reinforces the reoccurrence of access to our services and a successful redirect to service delivery from our website. Recognizing this, we will enhance information availability to our consumers and ensure they are connected to our MailChimp E-Newsletter so they can obtain up-to-date information. Another 23% of our referrals come from technology services. This includes the referrals we receive from our collaboration with Able Gamers and being listed as a Demonstration/Loan site for many of the computer and related devices such as the GlassOuse hands-free mouse. This also includes Durable Medical Equipment vendors that are unable to meet the needs of their consumers. We recognized an increase in our referrals from non-metro referrals up to 33%, which demonstrates success in our outreach efforts to rural areas of Iowa.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa entered into a memorandum of understanding with Habitat for Humanity of North Central Iowa. The intent of this collaboration is to provide recyclable, modular ramps in the eight-county area served by Habitat for Humanity of North Central Iowa. Easterseals Iowa's engagement in this collaboration is through the reutilization/long-term loan program and Habitat for Humanity of North Central Iowa evaluates and installs the ramps. Habitat for Humanity of North Central Iowa secured funding for the ramps which are owned and distributed by Easterseals Iowa.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program has limited staff resources to cover the entire state and does not have the staff capacity to evaluate and install ramps. The awareness of this program and awareness of assistive technology, in general, is enhanced by connecting with a different non-profit that reaches individuals ESI is unable to reach. The partnership is successful as Habitat for Humanity is able to provide the labor and their offices are located within the eight-county radius, which is a minimum of two hours from ESI's headquarters. ESI ATP and Habitat for Humanity remain within the first year of this project, but intentions are to continue this collaboration and explore additional, replica collaborations with Habitat for Humanity locations statewide. Program eligibility and details are outlined by a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document that is provided online for borrowers. Habitat for Humanity of North Central Iowa (H4HNCI) can be contacted at (641) 424-8978 or programs@habitatnci.org.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Housing / Home Automation; Community Participation and Integration; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa team members were selected to serve on the advisory committees for three major outdoor and recreational projects. These projects include coordination with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Polk County Conservation, and Des Moines Public Parks.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Easterseals Iowa's role was to ensure a broad range of physical, sensory, and digital accessibility within multiple components of the projects.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
Easterseals Iowa participated in an invitation-only workgroup led by Iowa Medicaid Enterprise (IME) to establish new policies, procedures, and funding of Assistive Technology for a CMS redesign proposal. In this proposed policy to CMS, it was recommended that all HCBS Waiver programs include an annual funding amount for Assistive Technology as well as a fee structure for Iowa Medicaid Enterprise (IME) to pay for Assistive Technology evaluations.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Documents are not publically available at the current time due to delayed CMS approval.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Community Living
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The state of Iowa was funded to expand broadband access for underserved and marginalized populations. Easterseals Iowa serves on the Iowa Digital Equity Planning Committee assuring that Iowa's plan is accessible and inclusive for all Iowans.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
This plan remains in the planning stage of a multi-year implementation process. https://ocio.iowa.gov/broadband-grants
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $50,000 | Device Loan | True |
Amount: $50,000 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due to staff shortages, hiring full-time staff was not possible thus Relief-On-Call positions were filled to meet the needs of the program.
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:05:55 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)