National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Illinois 2023
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 01 | 00 | 01 |
| Approved Not made | 03 | 00 | 03 |
| Rejected | 16 | 02 | 18 |
| Total | 20 | 02 | 22 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $36,288 | Highest Income: | $36,288 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $36,288 | 01 | $36,288 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 00 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
| Percentage of Loans | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 01 | 100% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 01 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 01 | $30,000 |
| Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 01 | $30,000 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 5% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 5% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 05 | 01 | 5% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 01 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 01 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 01 | $30,000 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 01 | $30,000 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 4 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Tech Kitchen |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 25 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 6 |
| C. Total Served | 31 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 31 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 220 | $3,725 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 220 | $3,725 |
Activity 2
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Open Ended Loan (OEL) |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 495 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 66 |
| C. Total Served | 561 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 561 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 400 | $431,380 |
| Hearing | 9 | $3,445 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 2 | $178 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 4 | $1,791 |
| Daily living | 3 | $410 |
| Environmental adaptations | 26 | $5,576 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 2106 | $752,755 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 2550 | $1,195,535 |
Activity 3
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: ICC |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 389 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 145 |
| C. Total Served | 534 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 534 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 0 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 678 | $312,512 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 678 | $312,512 |
Activity 4
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Smart Home |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 31 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 13 |
| C. Total Served | 44 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 44 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 251 | $18,518 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
| Total | 251 | $18,518 |
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 61 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 10 |
| C. Total Served | 71 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 71 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 20 | $27 | $0 | $27 |
| Hearing | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 3 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily living | 70 | $476 | $0 | $476 |
| Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 9 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 4 | $20 | $0 | $20 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 5 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 111 | $523 | $0 | $523 |
D. Anecdote
Myshaun was born with a rare condition called Thrombocytopenia-absent radius (TAR) Syndrome. The absence of radial bones impacts his ability to use his hands safely and efficiently for activities of daily living. Myshaun was referred to the IATP Tech Kitchen program after visiting the IATP Demonstration Center and expressing his desire to become more independent in the kitchen as he starts college and looks forward to eventually living independently. The shortened length of Myshaun’s arms results in items held in his hands being close to his face. This proximity creates a dangerous situation in the kitchen, where sharp and hot tools are often used. Few adapted kitchen utensils are on the market to address this need. Unfortunately, extended kitchen tools are typically no longer than 16 inches, 6-12 inches short of what would allow safe access to a standard-height stove for Myshaun. Myshaun was also interested in learning about other tools that would make some tasks more accessible and developing alternative cooking techniques that would allow him to prepare his favorite foods. The Tech Kitchen worked with IATP Makers to design an adapted handle for a 16” spatula. With feedback from an IATP Occupational Therapist, Makers developed an angled loop handle that added about 14 inches of length and clipped directly onto the original utensil. Myshaun was successful in using the prototype handle at his first training. He was very excited to have a tool that allowed him to access the stove top safely and flip foods such as quesadillas, pancakes, and eggs. During this first training, Myshaun also found existing tools like the automatic jar opener, an adjustable height table, and a one-handed cutting board to be effective.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 561 | 186 | 750 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 02 | 110 | 118 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 22 | 22 |
| 4. Subtotal | 09 | 563 | 318 | 890 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 54 | 54 |
| 6. Subtotal | 09 | 563 | 372 | 944 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 298 | 298 |
| 8. Total | 09 | 563 | 670 | 1,242 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 47.46% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 856 | 68.92% |
| Satisfied | 75 | 6.04% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 0.48% |
| Not at all satisfied | 02 | 0.16% |
| Nonrespondent | 303 | 24.4% |
| Total Surveyed | 1,242 | |
| Response rate % | 75.6% |
G. Notes:
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 1,939 |
| C. Total | 1,939 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,939 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 161 | $284,306 | $0 | $284,306 |
| Hearing | 17 | $4,344 | $0 | $4,344 |
| Speech Communication | 26 | $103,440 | $0 | $103,440 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 14 | $15,035 | $0 | $15,035 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 902 | $286,572 | $0 | $286,572 |
| Daily Living | 820 | $98,468 | $0 | $98,468 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 54 | $27,156 | $0 | $27,156 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $20 | $0 | $20 |
| Computers and Related | 53 | $16,665 | $0 | $16,665 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 10 | $470 | $0 | $470 |
| Total | 2,058 | $836,476 | $0 | $836,476 |
D. Anecdote
Marla is a talented and dedicated artist. Born prematurely, Marla has been visually impaired since birth. She gradually lost all sight, including color and movement. Despite her sight loss, her remarkable tenacity and talent have allowed her to continue to create unique and beautiful works of art. It took Marla 2 ½ years to become proficient in braille and uses it daily. She has tried various methods of labeling including using orange transwrap and voice labelers, but nothing seemed to offer her the organization that she needed. A Braille label maker became available through the IATP Reuse Program and was provided to Marla for as long as it is useful to her. Marla said it was a life changer both for work and home. She uses the labels for all canned goods and spices in the kitchen. All shoes are labeled on the box and the 100 glazes that she uses for pottery are all neatly labeled. Marla said that she keeps the label maker on her desk at all times as she continues to find new items that need a label. The product has been a great asset and a safe and effective way to complete a task.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 08 | 01 | 1,579 | 1,588 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 01 | 82 | 89 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 03 | 01 | 258 | 262 |
| 4. Subtotal | 17 | 03 | 1,919 | 1,939 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 17 | 03 | 1,919 | 1,939 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 17 | 03 | 1,919 | 1,939 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 1,933 | 99.69% |
| Satisfied | 05 | 0.26% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.05% |
| Total Surveyed | 1,939 | |
| Response rate % | 99.95% |
G. Notes:
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 1,453 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 40 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 62 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 17 |
| Total | 1,572 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 138 | 16 | 154 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 286 | 46 | 332 |
| Representative of Education | 771 | 21 | 792 |
| Representative of Employment | 03 | 01 | 04 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 13 | 07 | 20 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 240 | 27 | 267 |
| Representatives of Technology | 02 | 01 | 03 |
| Total | 1,453 | 119 | 1,572 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 35 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 122 | 23 | 145 |
| Hearing | 56 | 15 | 71 |
| Speech Communication | 1,314 | 101 | 1,415 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 297 | 44 | 341 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 89 | 06 | 95 |
| Daily Living | 192 | 30 | 222 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Computers and Related | 101 | 35 | 136 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 | 03 | 10 |
| Total | 2,178 | 258 | 2,436 |
E. Anecdote
Larry is a retired gentleman with Parkinson’s disease and blindness. These conditions were affecting his quality of life, which, in turn, led to depression. Larry began working with Eve, an Occupational Therapist. Eve came into IATP searching for items that Larry could borrow to try for his daily living needs. After viewing available choices in the Demonstration Center, they were referred to IATP Device Loan. They borrowed a tilt switch and Powerlink from the Device Loan program to try in Larry’s home setting. They discovered Larry could use the tilt switch to play his favorite CDs by tilting his head. Being able to turn on his music independently has positively impacted Larry’s overall well-being.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 938 | 16 | 257 | 1,211 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 117 | 03 | 33 | 153 |
| Subtotal | 1,055 | 19 | 290 | 1,364 |
| Have not made a decision | 03 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
| Subtotal | 1,058 | 19 | 290 | 1,367 |
| Nonrespondent | 50 | 01 | 35 | 86 |
| Total | 1,108 | 20 | 325 | 1,453 |
| Performance on this measure | 99.72% | 100% | 100% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 20 | 10 | 47 | 77 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 01 | 12 | 18 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 04 | 00 | 04 | 08 |
| 4. Subtotal | 29 | 11 | 63 | 103 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 00 | 01 | 03 |
| 6. Subtotal | 31 | 11 | 64 | 106 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 03 | 09 | 13 |
| 8. Total | 32 | 14 | 73 | 119 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 93.55% | 100% | 98.44% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 1,541 | 98.03% |
| Satisfied | 18 | 1.15% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 0.38% |
| Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.06% |
| Nonrespondent | 06 | 0.38% |
| Total Surveyed | 1,572 | |
| Response rate % | 99.62% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 181 |
| Hearing | 27 |
| Speech Communication | 320 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 69 |
| Daily Living | 305 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 03 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 04 |
| Computers and Related | 35 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 19 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 983 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 715 | 159 | 874 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 145 | 353 | 498 |
| Representatives of Education | 102 | 399 | 501 |
| Representatives of Employment | 00 | 03 | 03 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 16 | 21 | 37 |
| Representative of Community Living | 04 | 06 | 10 |
| Representative of Technology | 01 | 16 | 17 |
| Total | 983 | 957 | 1,940 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 03 |
| Service Provider | 59 |
| Vendor | 324 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 386 |
D. Anecdote
Arlys learned about the Illinois Assistive Technology Program (IATP) when a representative from IATP presented to the assisted living facility where she resides. During the presentation, Arlys became aware of the programs and services provided by IATP at no cost to individuals with disabilities and health conditions in Illinois. Arlys later arranged a tour of the IATP Demonstration Center for herself, her granddaughter, Madison, and Madison’s friend, Jess, an Occupational Therapy student. Arlys thought it would be beneficial for the younger generation to learn about the assistive technology devices that are available and increase their awareness and understanding of how devices can help individuals with disabilities. In the Demonstration Center’s Smart Home kitchen, Arlys discovered tools that would increase her access to items in the cupboards, including adapted shelving options, and improve her ability to open bottles and jars unassisted. IATP staff were happy they were able to acquaint Madison and Jess with the different types of assistive technology that are available, and that Arlys was able to find something that would help her continue to be as independent as possible in her home.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 324 | 35 | 572 | 931 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 01 | 06 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 325 | 36 | 578 | 939 |
| Have not made a decision | 09 | 01 | 33 | 43 |
| Subtotal | 334 | 37 | 611 | 982 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Total | 334 | 37 | 612 | 983 |
| Performance on this measure | 97.31% | 97.3% | 94.44% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 1,801 | 92.84% |
| Satisfied | 131 | 6.75% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 06 | 0.31% |
| Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.05% |
| Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.05% |
| Total | 1,940 | |
| Response rate % | 99.95% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 31 | 572 | 1,812 | 2,415 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 17 | 04 | 204 | 225 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 07 | 01 | 284 | 292 |
| 4. Subtotal | 55 | 577 | 2,300 | 2,932 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 00 | 55 | 57 |
| 6. Subtotal | 57 | 577 | 2,355 | 2,989 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 03 | 307 | 311 |
| 8. Total | 58 | 580 | 2,662 | 3,300 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 84.21% | 99.83% | 75.99% | 80.32% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Not Met | |||
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 1,262 | 51 | 829 | 2,142 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 118 | 04 | 39 | 161 |
| Subtotal | 1,380 | 55 | 868 | 2,303 |
| Have not made a decision | 12 | 01 | 33 | 46 |
| Subtotal | 1,392 | 56 | 901 | 2,349 |
| Nonrespondent | 50 | 01 | 36 | 87 |
| Total | 1,442 | 57 | 937 | 2,436 |
| Performance on this measure | 99.14% | 98.21% | 96.23% | 98% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Satisfaction Rating
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.66% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 95.35% | 90% | Met |
Training
A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 345 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 50 |
| Representatives of Education | 234 |
| Representatives of Employment | 78 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 22 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 142 |
| Representatives of Technology | 34 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 905 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 791 | 114 | 00 | 905 |
B. Training Topics
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 487 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 13 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 40 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 285 |
| Transition | 80 |
| Total | 905 |
C. Description of Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
UIC nursing students were provided hands-on training on assistive technology (AT) devices in IATP’s Demonstration Center so that when they transition into different nursing positions, they are aware of AT and Durable Medical Equipment that is available to assist patients and their care givers stay healthy and reduce injuries. During the training, students were challenged to utilize clinical reasoning skills from information gained through the training and apply it during a part of the training that involved a simulated patient profile and they had to determine appropriate/beneficial AT options to address their needs.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Susy Woods, IATP’s Policy and Education Liaison was asked to conduct a training for families, educators and community providers titled “Why Sex Education is Crucial Part of the Transition Plan.” The training addressed the ongoing problem of sexual abuse on people with disabilities specifically in community residential settings and on college campuses. Statistical information and specific signs for educators, community providers and families need to look for were provided with an emphasis on individuals that are nonverbal. Examples of goals that could be written into the transition plan were provided along with other resource materials. might be written to address these issues.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
IATP conducted an Information Communication Technology (ICT) Accessibility training for the management, graphic design staff and support staff of the Illinois Department on Aging (IDoA) to ensure that the documents the agency was producing were accessibility. IDoA’s management was committed to having the graphic designers and numerous other key staff learn ICT Accessibility techniques to meet the state and federal laws. The designers were originally resistant, but management was committed to broadening their knowledge by requiring participation in future training.
D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 220 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 65 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 285 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 00% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 15% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 85% |
| Community Living | 00% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
IATP was asked to serve on the Advisory Committee of the Illinois Emergency Management Agency to help design and facilitate accessible services for AT/DME for individuals in the state affected by an emergency. IATP provided TA on state agencies responsibilities to ensuring full access to accessible services as well as provided information and support through its Reuse Program to help mitigate the needs of those that could be affected by a catastrophic event in the state.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
IATP was asked by University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) School of Nursing if it would partner with them and design a training curriculum for the nursing students entering their clinical semester. IATP’s CEO met with the program staff for the nursing program and outlined the deliverables through technical assistance IATP could offer and the subsequent training sessions that IATP would provide. A total of 14 Nursing Students who are planning on working in both hospital and in home health settings learned and had hands-on opportunities with AT and DME that will assist individuals with disabilities and other health conditions as they transition from a medical setting to be their homes.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. IATP marketed its Open House through print, radio and television streams which enticed approximately 300 visitors from around the state to attend the Open House held on April 19, 2023. IATP officially moved to its new location in late 2022. The new facility allowed for the expansion of established programs and the introduction of new programs. Guests were able to tour the 51,000-square-foot building from 2 pm to 7 pm. Tours were provided by Assistive Technology (AT) experts and supporting staff.
2. IATP conducted twelve, 10-minute radio interviews featuring each of required Core Services of the AT Act and the other contractual programs offered by IATP on the Sam Madonia Show, a local radio show. The radio show listening audience it roughly14,000 individuals in Springfield and surrounding communities. The increase in the number of visitors after each interview was significant and IATP is reaching out to other radio stations in the state to see if the interviews could be replicated for their listening audiences.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 1,180 | 03 | 1,183 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 462 | 05 | 467 |
| Representative of Education | 1,043 | 02 | 1,045 |
| Representative of Employment | 06 | 01 | 07 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 55 | 00 | 55 |
| Representative of Community Living | 228 | 01 | 229 |
| Representative of Technology | 16 | 00 | 16 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 2,990 | 12 | 3,002 |
Referral Types:
During Fiscal Year 2023, IATP utilized a variety of approaches to increase referrals to its AT Act and other contracted services it provides. One such approach was requesting our lead agency provide us with the opportunity of conducting Zoom trainings on the new expanded programs and services offered through our AT Act contract for the staff in each of their divisions. By having the opportunity to remind them of our programs and introduce their staff to the new programs, IATP noticed a considerable spike in referrals. In addition, IATP conducted Zoom training for all CILS, Community Care Provider and Area Agency on Aging Organizations statewide. IATP also collaborated with one of the local hospitals and conducted a hybrid demonstration with a few medical doctors in the building and the others were back in the hospital. The number of referrals of patients transitioning out of the hospital increased significantly after that AT demonstration. Another strategy IATP implemented was to produce targeted print materials that were circulated in a variety of ways through our partnerships with the state agencies and other providers organizations.
Referral Sources:
Most of the referrals for I&A support and services are from local providers, self-referrals, and health care providers statewide. IATP has added a Communications Program which is comprised of three staff, a Chief Communications Officer, a Marketing Designer and Marketing Specialist. This program has created accessible materials, social media and radio and print advertisements which has increased our visibility and led to an increase in direct referrals for assistance. The highest categories of referrals received are Individuals with disabilities, friends, and family 11%; Educational Providers 51% and Health Care Providers at 9%.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
| Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
|---|
A. Coordination/Collaboration
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
IATP’s CEO met the medical doctor responsible for all physicians’ training at a holiday event. As a result of the chance meeting IATP offered to collaborate with Memorial Medical Center and SIU to increase the knowledge and awareness of the doctors had of assistive technology and durable medical equipment through a virtual tour and demonstration. The demonstration was a hybrid of some doctors being in person and the others were linked virtually through telepresence. A total of 71 health providers participated in the tour and AT demonstration.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
The main objectives of the tour and AT/DME Demonstration were for acute therapy staff and doctors to have a general understanding of the value of AT and be familiar with IATP programs and services to share with patients and to refer patients in need of access to AT and durable medical equipment for short-and long-term use to address their acute needs and ensure greater success living in their homes. Both the AT Demonstration Center and the Reuse Program experienced significant increases in the number of referrals. A few doctors have begun contacting IATP directly when with their patient to see if there is some assistance the agency can provide the individual. IATP attributes this collaboration and the fact that we are closer to the medical district with greater involvement from therapists, doctors, and other medical staff.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; Training;
Overview of State Improvement Activities
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
|---|
B. State Improvements
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
As a result of the ICT training IATP staff conducted for IDoA management, graphic designers and support staff, IDoA committed to expanding their knowledge and implementation of approaches to create accessible materials.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
IDoA requested that IATP conduct at least two or more ICT trainings for 20+ staff in Springfield and Chicago during fiscal year 2024.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
Additional And Leveraged Funds
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public/State Agency | $400,000 | Reuse | True |
| Public/State Agency | $809,777 | Demonstration | True |
| Public/State Agency | $1,102,000 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $900,000 | Demonstration | True |
| Public/State Agency | $350,000 | Device Loan | True |
| Public/State Agency | $1,731,187 | State Financing | True |
| Public/State Agency | $300,000 | Demonstration | True |
| Amount: $5,592,964 |
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:04:59 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)