National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Idaho 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Idaho Assistive Technology Project
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
http://idahoat.org
Mailing Address:
1187 Alturas Dr
City:
Moscow
State:
ID
Zip Code:
83843
Program Email:
idahoat@uidaho.edu
Phone:
1-800-432-8324
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
University of Idaho
Mailing Address:
875 Perimeter Dr
City:
Moscow
State:
ID
Zip Code:
83844
Program URL:

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Carson, Janice
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
208-885-6104
E-mail:
janicec@uidaho.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Martonick, Sarah
Title:
Director, Office of Sponsored Programs
Phone:
208-885-2145
E-mail:
smartonick@uidaho.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Martonick, Sarah
Title:
Director, Office of Sponsored Programs
Phone:
208-885-2145
E-mail:
smartonick@uidaho.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 03 00 03
Approved Not made 02 00 02
Rejected 05 00 05
Total 10 00 10

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $11,844 Highest Income: $85,200

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$178,272 03 $59,424

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 01 00 00 00 00 02 03
Percentage of Loans 33.33% 0% 0% 0% 0% 66.67% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 01 33.33%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 02 66.67%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 03 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 01 $2,697
Partnership Loans 02 $7,400
Total 03 $10,097

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 5%
Highest 8.25%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
21 03 7%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 01
6.1% to 8.0% 01
8.1% - 10.0% 01
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 03

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 01 $2,697
Hearing 04 $7,400
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 00 $0
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 05 $10,097

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 00
Net loss for loans in default $0

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)8
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)2
C. Total Served10

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures10

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 7$7,183
Hearing 1$289
Speech communication1$17
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning0$0
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 11$9,223
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total20$16,712



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

The first loan through our new partnership with Northwest Access Fund was approved in August. The loan was for a 29-year-old blind consumer who wanted a Mantis Q40 Bluetooth braille display. He was referred to IATP by the Commission for the Blind. He says he is very tech savvy and will be able to pair the braille display with his screen reader or smartphone, allowing him to function easier in his daily life. He had no prior credit and was excited to begin building a credit history.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 01 11 12
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 00 01
4. Subtotal 00 02 11 13
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 02 11 13
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 02 11 13
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 13 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 13
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 53
C. Total 53

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 53

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 05 $12,585 $0 $12,585
Hearing 10 $1,182 $0 $1,182
Speech Communication 01 $55 $0 $55
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 01 $100 $0 $100
Environmental Adaptations 03 $350 $0 $350
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 46 $32,424 $0 $32,424
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 66 $46,696 $0 $46,696

D. Anecdote

IATP staff worked with Idaho Education Services for the Deaf/Blind to create an open loan for a ringing soccer ball. The ball was borrowed for a student with a vision impairment to use in adaptive PE. It will remain with the organization to be used by other students as needed.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 20 01 26 47
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 00 04 05
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 00 01
4. Subtotal 21 02 30 53
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 21 02 30 53
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 21 02 30 53
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 52 98.11%
Satisfied 01 1.89%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 53
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 300
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 28
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 43
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 43
Total 414

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 36 13 49
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 120 28 148
Representative of Education 66 43 109
Representative of Employment 02 00 02
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 67 27 94
Representatives of Community Living 06 02 08
Representatives of Technology 03 01 04
Total 300 114 414

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 14 07 21
Hearing 37 07 44
Speech Communication 86 37 123
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 81 29 110
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 01 03
Daily Living 13 09 22
Environmental Adaptations 33 15 48
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 165 61 226
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 08 09 17
Total 439 175 614

E. Anecdote

An iPad was lent to a student who struggles with handwriting math work. The iPad came with an App that converts handwriting to math equations. Using the app, the student could practice writing independently and get it to a legible enough appearance for the iPad to recognize and convert it onto a digitized math worksheet. He could then independently submit this material to his teacher, whereas previously, the work would not have been legible enough to submit without the help of a scribe.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 174 12 90 276
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 04 04 13 21
Subtotal 178 16 103 297
Have not made a decision 00 00 03 03
Subtotal 178 16 106 300
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 178 16 106 300
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 97.17%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 42 03 24 69
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 20 03 19 42
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 00 02 03
4. Subtotal 63 06 45 114
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 63 06 45 114
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 63 06 45 114
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 386 93.24%
Satisfied 17 4.11%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.24%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.24%
Nonrespondent 09 2.17%
Total Surveyed 414
Response rate % 97.83%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 14
Hearing 16
Speech Communication 27
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 13
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00
Daily Living 08
Environmental Adaptations 03
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 08
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Device Demonstrations 89

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 48 26 74
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 04 30 34
Representatives of Education 29 05 34
Representatives of Employment 00 00 00
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 07 14 21
Representative of Community Living 01 02 03
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Total 89 77 166

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 21
Service Provider 12
Vendor 95
Repair Service 00
Others 21
Total 149

D. Anecdote

IATP staff assisted in working with a vocational rehabilitation consumer by providing a demonstration. The consumer had the opportunity to test various assistive technology devices to help him with his work tasks. He identified the devices that would be most beneficial for him and is currently working with his VR counselor to obtain them for his work.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 36 08 44 88
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 36 08 44 88
Have not made a decision 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 36 08 45 89
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 36 08 45 89
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 97.78%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 164 98.8%
Satisfied 02 1.2%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 166
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 62 05 61 128
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 21 03 23 47
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 02 02 05
4. Subtotal 84 10 86 180
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 84 10 86 180
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 84 10 86 180
9. Performance on this measure 98.81% 80% 97.67% 97.22%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 210 20 134 364
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 04 04 13 21
Subtotal 214 24 147 385
Have not made a decision 00 00 04 04
Subtotal 214 24 151 389
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 214 24 151 389
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 97.35% 98.97%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.69% 95% Met
Response Rate 98.61% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 232
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 76
Representatives of Education 140
Representatives of Employment 12
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 146
Representatives of Community Living 51
Representatives of Technology 00
Unable to Categorize 47
TOTAL 704

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
569 135 00 704

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 249
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 266
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 10
Transition 179
Total 704

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Training to Occupational Therapy students and professionals: IATP staff presented training on communication access technologies to the Idaho OT Association conference and assistive technology to occupational therapy students at Idaho State University and the College of Southern Idaho. At the IOTA Conference, one of the attendees who was hard of hearing told us that was the first time she had experienced a presentation with real-time captioning, which allowed her to stay focused instead of tuning out because of exhaustion trying to guess the things she couldn’t understand.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Tools for Life is a post-secondary transition conference for youth with disabilities and all who support them. Attendees spend two days sharing information and resources. During the event, students learn skills to help them transition, including options for employment, assistive technology, post-secondary education, independent living, and self-advocacy. The 2023 event was held in Boise with a record-breaking 179 student attendees.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

The Idaho Disability Accessibility Consortium (IDAC), co-led by IATP staff, provides training from the novice to the subject matter expert level. One participant had just taken on a new job and was informed she would be responsible for website and digital content accessibility. She appreciated the TA sessions to fine-tune her skills and clarify her understanding.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 09
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 01
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 10
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 00%
Employment 00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 100%
Community Living 00%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

This year, the Communication Access Program, a collaboration with the Southwest Idaho Area Agency on Aging, provided technical assistance within long-term care facilities. This assistance resulted in the acquisition of a foot mouse and head switch for a nursing home resident with unintelligible speech and no use of hands or feet, training on using phone captioning for a hard-of-hearing resident who couldn’t benefit from amplification, a simplified interface phone for a resident with dementia, and a tablet and joystick mouse for a resident with tremor issues.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. On August 10-11, 2023, IATP staff had a booth at the Western Partnerships Conference on Human Services. Staff provided information on both innovative techniques for AT assessments and disability services. About 400 attendees visited our booth. Attendees included human service professionals, teachers, counselors, parents, and self-advocates. Over 100 brochures were given out to attendees interested in our services, and they left our table excited to see what types of technology were available.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 358 59 417
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 212 26 238
Representative of Education 405 01 406
Representative of Employment 73 02 75
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 150 33 183
Representative of Community Living 246 20 266
Representative of Technology 08 04 12
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 1,452 145 1,597

Referral Types:

Most of our I & A for AT Device/Service areas are up. We continue to increase our I&A in education due to our AT/secondary transition conference and statewide training on AAC for SLPs. Our education grant includes a dissemination coordinator who provides ongoing information to the LEAs statewide throughout the year. Additionally, we have begun doing short reels on Instagram to highlight some of our new equipment. We also have attended conferences to present and maintain a table. This often increases our I&A from representatives in community living. Our AT Funding area has dropped. We continued statewide face-to-face outreach; however, it was not as extensive. Overall, our total numbers in I&A increased by 8%.

Referral Sources:

Our referrals in employment have increased from 21 last year to 73 this year. This is due to the statewide training and TA for VR staff. We have a state member who will primarily be focused on AT and employment this next year. We hope to continue growing this area through our partnership with our VR program. We also increased our referrals for community living. A grant has driven this through an Area Agency on Aging, our iCanConnect program, and conferences. We hope to continue funding with our AAA next year.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

We provided AAC training in three locations across the state, primarily focusing on SLPs in private and K12 practice. Family members, education professionals, and preservice SLPs also attended the training. The partnerships included IATP and the Idaho Department of Education- Special Education division.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

Initial data indicates increased knowledge and operationalizing of new or finetuned skills for the SLPs. We will continue this work through our DOE grant funding with ongoing community practice opportunities for SLPs in Idaho. Additionally, the entire training is available in an accessible public-facing format and on an LMS for credit. It is critical to have AAC experts on staff or through contract to build these skills in a rural state.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Training;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Federal$8,602DemonstrationTrue
Public/State Agency$174,007TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$60,370Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$63,489Device LoanTrue
Federal$2,091Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Federal$4,243Device LoanTrue
Federal$16,712Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$59,018DemonstrationTrue
Public/State Agency$7,964Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Federal$10,715TrainingTrue
Amount: $407,211

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:04:27 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.