Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Approved Not made | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Rejected | 05 | 01 | 06 |
Total | 09 | 01 | 10 |
Lowest Income: | $42,200 | Highest Income: | $47,700 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$137,000 | 03 | $45,667 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 00 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
Percentage of Loans | 0% | 0% | 33.33% | 66.67% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 03 | 100% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 03 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 03 | $88,000 |
Total | 03 | $88,000 |
Lowest | 4% |
---|---|
Highest | 4% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
12 | 03 | 4% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 03 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 03 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 03 | $88,000 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 03 | $88,000 |
Number Loans in default | 01 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $21,000 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 4 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 2 |
C. Total Served | 6 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 6 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 2 | $3,215 |
Hearing | 4 | $1,889 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 7 | $4,831 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 13 | $9,935 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
The CT AT Act Program Assistive Technology Loan Program (ATLP) always works to find grants for individuals who apply for or express interest in our financial loans. Helping to find funding that does not have to be paid back is one way we assist individuals in acquiring Assistive Technology and reducing the amount needed for a loan. Sometimes we are able to find enough grant funding to allow the person to avoid borrowing funds from us completely. Although this may reduce the number of loans we provide, we believe this is in the best interest of the individual or family member. This past year we received an application from a parent with low income who would just not be able to afford a loan payment, no matter how low we would be able to make it. She was in need of a modified vehicle to be able to transport her growing son to school, doctor's appointments and the community. She was referred to several local grant programs which she applied for and was going to try to do fund raising. One of the grant programs worked to promote their fundraiser and committed to help cover the balance of the vehicle with their grant funds. The applicant connected with our program in March of 2023 and by August she had sufficient funding to purchase the van without having to incur the additional burden of even a low interest financial loan.
The CT AT Act Program is the certified agency in CT to provide the National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program services. This year we had the pleasure of assisting Pearl, a 95-year-old women, obtain new technology. Pearl is a returning consumer who previously received an iPad from our program. She enjoys connecting with friends and family and with her advanced age and significant hearing loss, we wanted to make communicating and connecting easier for her. Because she loves to sit outside during the summertime, a cordless amplified phone for in home was provided along with some training. It took her just a little bit of time to understand how the answering machine worked, and given the amplification she is able to hear on the phone with the little bit of hearing she has left. She was also provided with the Blindshell Classic Smartphone, an easy-to-use phone for individuals with vision and hearing loss. During her training she learned how to set the speed dial numbers for 5 close friends and family in case of emergencies and to make it easier for her to dial her most frequent numbers. This has been so helpful to her when she goes out into her community.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 06 | 08 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 07 | 09 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 07 | 09 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 02 | 07 | 09 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 07 | 77.78% |
Satisfied | 02 | 22.22% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 09 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
As mentioned in our anecdote for our ATLP, we work to find grant funding for all individuals who contact us for a financial loan. This past year we were able to assist individuals obtain a total of $74,537 in grant funding, along with $84,695 in state funding (primarily through state VR), for a total of $159,231 in cost savings to consumers. In our telecommunication distribution program although we only served 7 new consumers, we also provided services such as trainig or maintenance / troubleshooting on devices consumers received previously to 5 other individuals. We also had 8 individuals who were either not eligible, did not provide completed applicaitons or are still pending eligibility.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 438 |
C. Total | 438 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 438 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 05 | $2,694 | $190 | $2,504 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 03 | $25 | $0 | $25 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 328 | $210,226 | $39,943 | $170,283 |
Daily Living | 208 | $70,754 | $14,300 | $56,454 |
Environmental Adaptations | 07 | $2,099 | $85 | $2,014 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 06 | $383 | $0 | $383 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 46 | $8,280 | $1,974 | $6,306 |
Total | 603 | $294,461 | $56,492 | $237,969 |
The CT AT Act Partner agency, NEAT at Oak Hill received a Bank of America Grant for Youth with Disability allowing them to obtain devices give to consumers at no cost. Through this grant and in combination with their Adaptive Equipment Recycling program, NEAT at Oak Hill was able to assist a family who came to CT as a result of the war in Ukraine. The family was able to obtain an EVA Cardiac Walker at a significant cost savings. The attached photo is a thank you card the NEAT staff received from a staff person at an organization who was helping the family.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 01 | 421 | 426 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 02 | 05 | 03 | 10 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 06 | 06 | 425 | 437 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 07 | 06 | 425 | 438 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 07 | 06 | 425 | 438 |
9. Performance on this measure | 85.71% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 433 | 98.86% |
Satisfied | 05 | 1.14% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 438 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
The speech communication devices that were provided via Open Ended loan were very low cost items, such as accessories for a speech comm device and a talking book for AAC. As a result the total cost of in this category is low compared to typical items that fall into this category.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 299 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 17 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 45 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 11 |
Total | 372 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 53 | 13 | 66 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 04 | 02 | 06 |
Representative of Education | 150 | 38 | 188 |
Representative of Employment | 02 | 04 | 06 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 07 | 02 | 09 |
Representatives of Community Living | 80 | 10 | 90 |
Representatives of Technology | 03 | 04 | 07 |
Total | 299 | 73 | 372 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 09 | 02 | 11 |
Hearing | 07 | 06 | 13 |
Speech Communication | 537 | 41 | 578 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 109 | 08 | 117 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 | 05 | 11 |
Daily Living | 17 | 09 | 26 |
Environmental Adaptations | 25 | 17 | 42 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 109 | 28 | 137 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | 15 | 17 |
Total | 821 | 131 | 952 |
CT AT Act Program partner agency EASTCONN was asked to do a device loan of a mount for a student who uses a switch for his communication device. When traveling in his wheelchair, he had difficulty communicating on his talker because he needed his hands to push his manual wheelchair. The original attachment was cumbersome, making it a challenge for the student to access and use his communication device. His Physical Therapist and speech and language pathologist wanted him to be able to communicate while he is moving about the school. With the talker in auditory scanning mode, the student was able to scan through his choices by listening and hit the switch when his selection was heard. When the student discovered he could communicate using his new device, which using his wheelchair, he was ecstatic. He immediately propelled his wheelchair down the hall, saying hello to everyone he passed along the way.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 146 | 21 | 96 | 263 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 19 | 08 | 03 | 30 |
Subtotal | 165 | 29 | 99 | 293 |
Have not made a decision | 05 | 00 | 00 | 05 |
Subtotal | 170 | 29 | 99 | 298 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 171 | 29 | 99 | 299 |
Performance on this measure | 97.06% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 14 | 03 | 02 | 19 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 08 | 11 | 25 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 01 | 01 | 10 |
4. Subtotal | 28 | 12 | 14 | 54 |
5. None of the above | 05 | 00 | 00 | 05 |
6. Subtotal | 33 | 12 | 14 | 59 |
7. Nonrespondent | 13 | 00 | 01 | 14 |
8. Total | 46 | 12 | 15 | 73 |
9. Performance on this measure | 82.11% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 331 | 88.98% |
Satisfied | 29 | 7.8% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.27% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 11 | 2.96% |
Total Surveyed | 372 | |
Response rate % | 97.04% |
One of the CT AT Act partner agencies, SERC AT Corner, was closed for several months during this year while their organization relocated to a new space, moved in and re-established their AT Corner in their library. They also lost their primary staff person were not able to obtain or submit performance measures or satisfaction data, resulting in a higher number of nonrespondents for both.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 15 |
Hearing | 03 |
Speech Communication | 210 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 119 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 |
Daily Living | 61 |
Environmental Adaptations | 12 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 54 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 479 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 178 | 121 | 299 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 13 | 144 | 157 |
Representatives of Education | 236 | 610 | 846 |
Representatives of Employment | 06 | 10 | 16 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00 | 11 | 11 |
Representative of Community Living | 45 | 134 | 179 |
Representative of Technology | 01 | 07 | 08 |
Total | 479 | 1,037 | 1,516 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 09 |
Service Provider | 23 |
Vendor | 697 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 01 |
Total | 730 |
Jessica visited CT AT Act Partner agency ATECH for a demonstration of an OrCam Read, a portable scanning device that reads text aloud after simply pointing at text and clicking the button. Jessica used very high level magnification and has a CCTV at home, but it is not portable. She was looking for a portable device that incorporated speech output and that she could use with the very limited use of her left hand due to CP. During the demonstration, this device worked extremely well for Jessica to use to access text in the community, and she was able to use the device readily with one hand. An area of difficulty she expressed as a safety concern in the community was reading license plates when she orders an Uber, to ensure she would get into the right vehicle. The ATECH team decided to extend the AT Demo in the parking lot reading license plates with mixed but promising results. When Jessica's Uber arrived, she tried using the OrCam on the car’s plate. Jessica felt the device would meet her needs and is pursuing a loaner from the company to continue to test it out.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 317 | 26 | 103 | 446 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 09 | 03 | 08 | 20 |
Subtotal | 326 | 29 | 111 | 466 |
Have not made a decision | 04 | 00 | 09 | 13 |
Subtotal | 330 | 29 | 120 | 479 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 330 | 29 | 120 | 479 |
Performance on this measure | 98.79% | 100% | 92.5% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,266 | 83.51% |
Satisfied | 239 | 15.77% |
Satisfied somewhat | 08 | 0.53% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.07% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 0.13% |
Total | 1,516 | |
Response rate % | 99.87% |
One of the CT AT Act partner agencies, SERC AT Corner, was closed for several months during this year while their organization relocated to a new space, moved in and re-established their AT Corner in their library. As a result, numbers for AT demos from them were extremely low.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 18 | 06 | 429 | 453 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 08 | 13 | 15 | 36 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 01 | 02 | 11 |
4. Subtotal | 34 | 20 | 446 | 500 |
5. None of the above | 06 | 00 | 00 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 40 | 20 | 446 | 506 |
7. Nonrespondent | 13 | 00 | 01 | 14 |
8. Total | 53 | 20 | 447 | 520 |
9. Performance on this measure | 65% | 95% | 99.55% | 96.64% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 463 | 47 | 199 | 709 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 28 | 11 | 11 | 50 |
Subtotal | 491 | 58 | 210 | 759 |
Have not made a decision | 09 | 00 | 09 | 18 |
Subtotal | 500 | 58 | 219 | 777 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 501 | 58 | 219 | 778 |
Performance on this measure | 98.2% | 100% | 95.89% | 97.68% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.57% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.44% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 440 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 152 |
Representatives of Education | 1,029 |
Representatives of Employment | 81 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 46 |
Representatives of Community Living | 714 |
Representatives of Technology | 24 |
Unable to Categorize | 55 |
TOTAL | 2,541 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
2,126 | 392 | 23 | 2,541 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 2,013 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 190 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 264 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 53 |
Transition | 21 |
Total | 2,541 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
CT AT Act Program community AT Partner NEAT at Oak Hill received sponsorship from the MENTOR Network Charitable Foundation, allowing NEAT to launch a training to first responders and mandated reporters, at no cost to them, called "Communicating with People with Disabilities in Crisis Situations." This presentation was provided to attendees from the Dept of Developmental Services Abuse Investigation Division and the Division of Investigations. NEAT continues to offer this training to first responders across the state. Description: This presentation will continue to develop mandated reporters’ skills and confidence in engaging with children and adults with communication disabilities. This presentation will include a discussion of interaction and communication strategies to use during emergency situations related to certain disability characteristics (e.g., speech/language disorders, social language challenges, sensory challenges, etc.). Also included is a brief review of the prevalence of sexual assault and incarceration rates for individuals with developmental disabilities. Attendees will be educated on use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and provided with customized low-tech (printable) communication boards that could be utilized in real situations. Learning Objectives: Brief Introduction to Assistive Technology (AT) and Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC) Disabilities that may impact communication Prevalence of sexual assault and incarceration for people with developmental disabilities Implications during difficult or emergency situations Strategies for interacting with people with developmental and/or communication challenges
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
CT AT Act Program community partner agency EASTCONN provided training to the staff at the Transition Academy. This transition program serves students with disabilities 18 up to 22, providing education and training to help them transition to their adult life. The focus of this training was reviewing the use of features in Read & Write, a literacy program, to support students in reading materials including websites, applications, directions and in completing written tasks including job applications, online forms, letters, transition assessments, self-evaluations, and more. The use of speech-to-text was also included as well as features that assist with editing and revising written work. Participants were provided with a matrix of features explaining the parts of the reading and writing process each feature supports. The participants thought many of their Transition students would benefit from the text-to-speech and especially liked the bi-modal highlighting and the vocabulary list feature for students who need picture based support. Their intention was to introduce the software to their students and support their use of it.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
The CT AT Act Program continues to sponsor free ICT training across the state, via webinar with caption and with American Sign Language Interpreters upon request. Trainings are conducted by a contracted expert in the field, Dr. Lauren Tucker. Trainings are typically conducted as a two part series and participants are encouraged to commit to both sessions, which are recorded and shared with participants. Participants are also welcomed to attend the introduction to accessibility sessions as many times as they would like. We have had some individuals take the session up to 3 times. We intend to invite all past participants to a hands on, level two, ICT training next Spring. Participants of ICT trainings have been wide ranging, including many state employees from various agencies, including Library for the Blind, State Unit on Aging, Vocational Rehabilitation, Dept of Education, Dept of Developmental Services; along with nonprofit agencies, library staff, college and university staff, employers and individuals with disabilities and their family members. The feedback has been very positive and the training very well received.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 36 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 16 |
No known outcome at this time | 01 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 53 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 98.1% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 05% |
---|---|
Employment | 55% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 15% |
Community Living | 20% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 05% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
CT AT Act Program Director has played a significant role in the states Digital Equity Plan as a representative of the Dept of Aging and Disability Services. This 5 year plan is intended to help bring broadband connectivity and devices to identified populations in CT, which includes individuals with disabilities, aging adults, veterans, low income, and more. The Program Director has meet several times with the key team members who are writing CT's plan, has had input and influence on stakeholder surveys to ensure accessibility and participation from the above populations and agencies who serve these populations . Program Director has had the opportunity to participate in community forums and helped to shape the discussion as well as review and share feedback on the draft plan.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
CT AT Act Partner agency, CREC, provided TA to a school district throughout the year. This involved meeting with and training district administrator, PPT stakeholders, and related service staff on the AT consideration process and identified pros and cons. A new process was developed and was implemented with review sessions throughout the school year. Check-ins occurred and adjustments made. The impact of this TA will be positive for all students with disabilities in this district, who will now have an improved AT consideration process for them of them at every IEP as they progress through school and transition out of school.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The CT AT Act Program collaborated for the first time with the Dept of Developmental Services and the Developmental Disabilities Council to host the CT Assistive Technology Innovation conference in June of 2023. The focus of the conference was to introduce people with Intellectual Disabilities as well as all other disabilities, and their family members to Assistive Technology devices, services and programming in our state. Being one of the first in person AT conference in CT in some time, due to COVID, and because of the limited spacing at the hotel, we had to unfortunately turn attendees and exhibitors away. There was a total of 18 exhibitors, we had 5 exhibitor breakout demos and multiple breakout sessions focusing on AT for independence, remote support, AT for employment, tablet accessibility features, smart home technology and more. All of the CT AT Act Program partners participated either by having an exhibitor table or presenting. There were over 300 individuals in attendance. As a result of this success, we are planning a 2 day AT conference for Spring of 2024.
2. The CT AT Act Progrom partner, NEAT and Oak Hill hosted the 2023 Assistive Technology Summit / Open House at their location, welcoming the public to attend their first in person interactive event since the pandemic. Approximately 175 people gathered to try the various technology displayed, 15 AT Champions and a combination of 18 Oak Hill employees & students supported NEAT's 7 assistive technology specialists from adaptive gaming, smart home on wheels, low tech to high tech communication, switch access, bridging the digital divide and software applications to showcase making life more manageable regardless of age. Durable medical equipment was on display, presentations were on AT tools to make life easier and overview on AAC and real life stories from users. Some of those highlights of the day included: • Tours of the Smart Home on Wheels (SHOW) • A hands-on exploration of assistive technology and augmentative alternative communication • Presentations about technology and the unique ways it can impact and improve one’s quality of life • A special speaker session from Debbie S. who used her communication device to share her personal triumphs and struggles with assistive technology and how it enhances her independence • Adaptive Video Gaming was available for people to engage and discover all the possible solutions for better access for individuals with disabilities • Several students with disabilities participated in vocational experiences to support the preparation of this event but also to help with the lunch sale. • Our Adaptive Equipment Reuse team introduced their program to many new customers • The Bridging the Digital Divide program was available to provide on-the-spot consultation to aging adults who need access to technology to improve social connectedness, and so much more. Overall, the engagement from the community was exhilarating and demonstrated a continued need for education around the importance of technology and how it can transform people’s quality of life. Our goal is to include this as an annual event. Valerie E., an AT Summit attendee and an employee of the Greater Hartford Transit District, which provides ADA Paratransit for people with disabilities, thanked us in a follow up email for our event and wrote an article in their monthly newsletter about her experience at the event: https://www.hartfordtransit.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/STAR-Summer-2023-Newsletter.pdf Overall survey ratings were very strong, with 93% describing the AT Summit as “Extremely Valuable” or “Very Valuable.” Pictures available upon request.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 459 | 10 | 469 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 130 | 17 | 147 |
Representative of Education | 189 | 02 | 191 |
Representative of Employment | 138 | 07 | 145 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 54 | 07 | 61 |
Representative of Community Living | 381 | 08 | 389 |
Representative of Technology | 122 | 00 | 122 |
Unable to Categorize | 30 | 00 | 30 |
Total | 1,503 | 51 | 1,554 |
The CT Tech Act Project and AT partner agencies focused on a variety of outreach activities over the past year. To promote our State Financing services, our processing tech meet quarterly with the state Vocational Rehabilitation Agency for the Blind to identify and meet with individuals who might be eligible for our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program. The processing tech also participated in a variety of outreach opportunities to connect with aging adults and people with disabilities. The Program Director made a strategic decision to work closely with the State Library System for Accessible Books and the CT Libraries and Partners for Digital Equity. As a result of these efforts, the CT Tech Act Project was able to coordinate presentations to the CT Libraries and Partners for Digital Equity committee, presented on accessible programming for libraries, provided Bridging the Digital Divide overview and had the Digital Divide Coordinators present on Tablet Accessibility Features, coordinating an AT demo day with about 5 other AT partners for library staff to learn about Assistive Technology and how AT might assist their patrons. Our Digital Divide Coordinators also worked closely with libraries in their towns to raise awareness of AT. As a result of these activities, the CT Tech Act Project and AT partners received an increased number of referrals from libraries across the state, including the State Library System, and we are becoming a 'go to' resource for several libraries.. Additionally, through the “Communicating with People with Disabilities in Crisis Situations” for first responders and other mandated reporters training conducted by AT partner, NEAT, they created a natural platform for providing outreach on assistive technology awareness, which has led to subsequent service referrals. As participants learned about the impact that AT and AAC can have on reducing abuse and on supporting positive outcome for individuals with disabilities, they became eager to jump on board with providing access to AT/AAC. As a result, NEAT has received inquiries and interest for services such as evaluations, additional training, smart home demonstrations, access to used durable medical equipment, and support from the Bridging the Digital Divide program.
Referral sources for I&A from the CT Tech Act Project and AT partners varies broadly. We receive a great majority of our referrals (nearly 14%) directly from our various websites and electronic newsletters and e-blasts. In person outreach events continues to be one of the best ways to connect with the public and have them reach out for I&A (just over 12%). Many of the CT school systems work directly with the AT Act Program partner agencies, such as NEAT, CREC, SERC and EASTCONN, therefore a very high percentage (nearly 11%) of referrals come from the representatives of Education. Other disability related agencies and organizations tend to refer to the CT Tech Act Project and our AT partners at a high rate (nearly 10.5%)Working directly with the state Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) agency allows for a large amount of referrals (approximately 8.5%) to come from representatives of employment, either by VR counselors directly, employers, or consumers of VR. The breakdown of referral sources is as follows: Disability & Advocacy Entities / Providers 16% Program Area Entities / Providers: 34% Awareness & Outreach Initiatives: 30% Prior Customers: 17% Unknown: 3%
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
CT's AT Act Program utilized AT Public Health funds in collaboration with the State Unit on Aging who contributed $292,838 of their Public Health funds and $108,000 in ADRC Funds to help create our Bridging the Digital Divide program in CT. Digital Divide Coordinators at two AT Partner agencies serve adults with disabilities and individuals 60 and older, providing one on one or group training on the use of mobile technology and computer, including turning on built in accessibility features and ensuring users can utilize their devices to access the internet, reduce social isolation, participate in telehealth and more. Tablets and hot spots may be provided to individuals 60 and older. Training can also be offered to individuals who work for organizations that serve these populations to enhance their capacity, such as libraries, senior centers, centers for independent living and more. In addition to the 3 FTE Digital Divide Coordinators, the 5 Centers for Independent Living are also collaborating on this project, utilizing their public health workforce funds to have 5 Community Health Advocates who are assisting individuals with disabilities with mobile tech coaching, smart home technology and personal care attendants as needed. Our goal has been to cross refer to one another (DDCs to/from CHAs) so that each individual receives the appropriate support and services.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
n the first year services, beginning Oct. 2022, our DDCs have been contacted by and reached 254 individuals, with 130 fully completing service delivery. The primary reasons for connecting with a DDC include needing a device or needing training non their own device. 80 Individuals requested to be able to connect to internet, 66 for training on Accessibility features, 20 on telehealth and 14 needed connectivity. The vast majority of individuals served are adults between 50 - 89 years old, who are female and primarily below the federal poverty level. In this time period, DDCs also reached 45 entities in the state, in some cases they were able to conduct outreach activities to the entity's client based or they were able to provide direct training to the staff who work at the entity's location to help develop their capacity to support their clients.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $356,878 | Technical Assistance | False |
Federal | $64,116 | Technical Assistance | True |
Federal | $10,686 | Demonstration | True |
Federal | $71,376 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $16,029 | Device Loan | True |
Federal | $47,583 | Training | True |
Federal | $16,029 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $100,280 | State Financing | True |
Amount: $682,977 |
Leveraged Funds that were used for Public Health (Bridging the Digital Divide Program described below) were used to provide one on one services, supports and trainings to consumers which are not appropriately captured in the AT Act Data as there is no true place to indicate 1 on 1 training, such as what was provided. Public Awareness events and group trainings for this program were captured in AT Act data.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 14:02:49 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)