National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

American Samoa 2023

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
American Samoa Assistive Technology Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 4561
City:
Pago Pago
State:
American Samoa
Zip Code:
96799
Program Email:
nlpeau@gmail.com
Phone:
6846991371
TTY:
6846991376

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
American Samoa Office of Vocational Rehabilitation
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 4561
City:
Pago Pago
State:
American Samoa
Zip Code:
96799
Program URL:

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Peau Nathaniel
Title:
AT Specialist
Phone:
6846991371
E-mail:
nlpeau@gmail.com
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Delaney Tilo
Title:
VR Director
Phone:
6846991371
E-mail:
delaney.tilo@vgo.as.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Nathaniel Lelei Peau
Title:
AT Specialist
Phone:
(684)699-1371
E-mail:
nlpeau@gmail.com

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Delaney Tilo
Title:
Director
Phone:
6846991371
E-mail:
delaney.tilo@go.as.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 65
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 94
C. Total 159

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 159

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 08 $1,100 $0 $1,100
Hearing 05 $900 $0 $900
Speech Communication 12 $1,300 $0 $1,300
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 10 $1,800 $0 $1,800
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 04 $980 $0 $980
Daily Living 04 $1,200 $0 $1,200
Environmental Adaptations 05 $680 $0 $680
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $1,200 $0 $1,200
Computers and Related 73 $17,050 $0 $17,050
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 122 $26,210 $0 $26,210

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 23 $2,500 $0 $2,500
Hearing 06 $900 $0 $900
Speech Communication 10 $800 $0 $800
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 02 $420 $0 $420
Environmental Adaptations 01 $320 $0 $320
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 82 $16,200 $0 $16,200
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 124 $21,140 $0 $21,140

D. Anecdote

Assistive Devices has always and will always be a workforce equalizer for people with special needs. The special needs community always show their appreciation for the many demonstrations and the time spent in the community sharing about the many different types of AT devices are available to our special needs community.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 18 58 06 82
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 16 55 06 77
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 34 113 12 159
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 34 113 12 159
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 34 113 12 159
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 145 91.19%
Satisfied 08 5.03%
Satisfied somewhat 06 3.77%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 159
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 115
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 09
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 08
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 15
Total 147

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 98 18 116
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 06 08 14
Representative of Education 02 01 03
Representative of Employment 05 01 06
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 01 01 02
Representatives of Community Living 01 01 02
Representatives of Technology 02 02 04
Total 115 32 147

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 35 06 41
Hearing 16 05 21
Speech Communication 19 02 21
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 21 00 21
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 08 00 08
Daily Living 22 07 29
Environmental Adaptations 16 02 18
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 108 16 124
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 00 00
Total 245 38 283

E. Anecdote

As students with special needs become more independent they are entering the workforce with confidence knowing that there are AT devices out there that can help them be more efficient and independent. The AT program device loan program allows special needs individuals hands-on experience with devices therefore making decisions easier.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 35 75 05 115
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 35 75 05 115
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 35 75 05 115
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 35 75 05 115
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 08 15 05 28
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 02 02 04
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 08 17 07 32
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 08 17 07 32
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 08 17 07 32
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 123 83.67%
Satisfied 22 14.97%
Satisfied somewhat 02 1.36%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 147
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 48
Hearing 21
Speech Communication 14
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00
Daily Living 00
Environmental Adaptations 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 54
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Device Demonstrations 137

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 70 28 98
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 49 30 79
Representatives of Education 02 08 10
Representatives of Employment 02 10 12
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 02 08 10
Representative of Community Living 02 12 14
Representative of Technology 10 18 28
Total 137 114 251

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 14
Service Provider 11
Vendor 24
Repair Service 10
Others 00
Total 59

D. Anecdote

American Samoa AT Program device demonstrations are always an important part of educating the general public and also a chance for our clients to see new devices. Device Demonstrations are always a fun and hands-on way to engage with the special needs community.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 80 52 05 137
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 80 52 05 137
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 80 52 05 137
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 80 52 05 137
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 231 92.03%
Satisfied 20 7.97%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 251
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 26 73 11 110
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 16 57 08 81
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 42 130 19 191
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 42 130 19 191
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 42 130 19 191
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100% 100%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 115 127 10 252
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 115 127 10 252
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 115 127 10 252
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 115 127 10 252
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100% 100%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 98.56% 95% Met
Response Rate 100% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 148
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 25
Representatives of Education 04
Representatives of Employment 02
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 02
Representatives of Community Living 02
Representatives of Technology 10
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 193

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
48 145 00 193

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 102
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 39
Combination of any/all of the above 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 45
Transition 07
Total 193

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

American Samoa AT Program device demonstrations are always an important part of educating the general public and also a chance for our clients to see new devices.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

As AT devices are become more mainstream especially with transition clients, training activities are becoming more important.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

As the word is getting out that our AT Program has a training program the list of participants has slowly but surely increased over the years and with the help of The Helen Keller Program communication device trainings has become popular.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 41
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 04
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 45
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 25%
Employment 25%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 10%
Community Living 15%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 25%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Our collaboration with Helen Keller has given us the opportunity to work with more clients with communication needs. Because of these trainings more people are able to communicate with the outside world.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

This fiscal year has seen an increase of clients looking to get back into education. As such technical assistance has become an important part of their effort.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. Assistive Technology has a contract with the local radio station that allows us to reach more clients. With our new partnership with Helen Keller we have also ran newspaper ads monthly and that seems to have brought in more clients from rural areas.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 72 47 119
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 23 16 39
Representative of Education 08 08 16
Representative of Employment 12 12 24
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 02 02 04
Representative of Community Living 02 02 04
Representative of Technology 12 12 24
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 131 99 230

Referral Types:

All programs that we work with have been helpful with referring clients as all our programs interconnect. Programs such as SPED and Helen Keller has shown to be very active in referring clients.

Referral Sources:

Radio advertising has been our main method of getting the word out to the public. Working with other programs in our field has also shown to be very effective.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The American Samoa Assistive Technologies Program has been working closely with the Helen Keller National Center (HKNC) on The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program. The National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) supports local programs that distribute equipment to low-income individuals who are deaf-blind (have combined hearing and vision loss) to enable access to telephone, advanced communications, and information services. This support was mandated by the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA) and is provided by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The collaboration with Helen Keller and the NDBEDP has enabled the American Samoa AT program not only demo equipment but now purchase equipment with grant funding from the FCC. This collaboration/partnership has expanded our knowledge of AT equipment and made the availability and affordability of equipment possible. For more information about the NDBEDP, please visit http://icanconnect.org or http://www.fcc.gov/ndbedp.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Housing / Home Automation; Community Participation and Integration; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community); Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

State Financing; Technical Assistance;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Federal$9,045DemonstrationTrue
Amount: $9,045

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 13 2024 13:59:33 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY23 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.