National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Wisconsin 2022

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
WisTech Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/wistech/index.htm
Mailing Address:
1 W. Wilson St., Room 551, PO Box 2659
City:
Madison
State:
Wisconsin
Zip Code:
53703
Program Email:
DHSWistech@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Phone:
608-514-2513
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services - Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources
Mailing Address:
1 W. Wilson St., Room 551, PO Box 2659
City:
Madison
State:
Wisconsin
Zip Code:
53703
Program URL:
https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/dph/badr.htm

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Plummer, Laura
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
608-514-2513
E-mail:
laura.plummer1@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Plummer, Laura
Title:
Assistive Technology Program Coordinator
Phone:
608-514-2513
E-mail:
laura.plummer1@dhs.wisconsin.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Sobczyk, Lisa
Title:
Social Services Supervisor
Phone:
608-266-9354
E-mail:
lisa.sobczyk@dhs.wisconsin.gov

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Molke, Carrie
Title:
Bureau Director
Phone:
608-267-5267
E-mail:
Carrie.Molke@dhs.wisconsin.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 11 03 14
Approved Not made 01 00 01
Rejected 06 02 08
Total 18 05 23

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $11,685 Highest Income: $98,914

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$591,443 14 $42,246

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 03 03 02 05 00 01 14
Percentage of Loans 21.43% 21.43% 14.29% 35.71% 0% 7.14% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 14 100%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 14 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 14 $128,845
Total 14 $128,845

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4%
Highest 4%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
56 14 4%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 14
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 14

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 01 $3,500
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 02 $13,400
Daily living 04 $31,437
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 04 $77,700
Computers and related 03 $2,808
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 14 $128,845

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 03
Net loss for loans in default $4,151

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)800
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)746
C. Total Served1546

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures1546

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 50$26,312
Hearing 2535$545,926
Speech communication282$144,462
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning0$0
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 154$77,187
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total3021$793,887



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

WisLoan, Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) alternative financing program, assisted a consumer with obtaining a trailer hitch for his vehicle. This individual utilizes a wheelchair and transports it with a small trailer. His current vehicle did not have a trailer hitch which meant he had to rely upon others for transportation. The consumer applied for and received a WisLoan for the purchase and installation of a trailer hitch on his vehicle. He shared that this has greatly increased his ability to be independent with appointments and social activities. This individual was also able to accelerate his payments on the loan due to the low interest rate.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 01 00 1,559 1,560
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 01 00 1,559 1,560
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 01 00 1,559 1,560
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 01 00 1,559 1,560
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 180 11.54%
Satisfied 173 11.09%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 1,207 77.37%
Total Surveyed 1,560
Response rate % 22.63%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 34
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 905
C. Total 939

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 939

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 01 $199 $0 $199
Hearing 01 $150 $0 $150
Speech Communication 19 $31,300 $3,125 $28,175
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 13 $6,835 $990 $5,845
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 $4,500 $2,400 $2,100
Daily Living 01 $1,500 $0 $1,500
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 37 $44,484 $6,515 $37,969

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 557 $49,705 $0 $49,705
Hearing 87 $16,215 $0 $16,215
Speech Communication 05 $521 $0 $521
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 04 $161 $0 $161
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 467 $134,767 $13,945 $120,822
Daily Living 119 $12,519 $48 $12,471
Environmental Adaptations 17 $5,826 $0 $5,826
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 05 $3,893 $0 $3,893
Computers and Related 23 $3,348 $0 $3,348
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 03 $645 $0 $645
Total 1,287 $227,600 $13,993 $213,607

D. Anecdote

indiGO, a Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) subcontractor, received a walking stick that was donated from an indiGO board member who wanted someone else to benefit from the device. indiGO's staff was working with a Native American woman who had difficulty with accessing the outdoors due to her physical health limitations. She also experienced fear and worry about being outside, especially in the winter with snow and ice. Staff from indiGO provided a demonstration of the walking stick with a non-slip cane tip and was able to provide this device to her as a donation. The consumer reported that she felt safe walking with the walking stick and cane prong. She shared that her physical health has improved and she has less anxiety about going for walks outside.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 01 00 463 464
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 02 02 129 133
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 01 15 17
4. Subtotal 04 03 607 614
5. None of the above 00 00 01 01
6. Subtotal 04 03 608 615
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 324 324
8. Total 04 03 932 939
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 65.13%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 271 28.86%
Satisfied 342 36.42%
Satisfied somewhat 02 0.21%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 324 34.5%
Total Surveyed 939
Response rate % 65.5%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 470
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 112
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 484
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 11
Total 1,077

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 373 490 863
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 60 88 148
Representative of Education 10 04 14
Representative of Employment 01 01 02
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 11 08 19
Representatives of Community Living 10 14 24
Representatives of Technology 05 02 07
Total 470 607 1,077

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 71 10 81
Hearing 201 30 231
Speech Communication 10 00 10
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 16 04 20
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 110 394 504
Daily Living 177 238 415
Environmental Adaptations 32 108 140
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 08 06 14
Computers and Related 77 21 98
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 42 17 59
Total 744 828 1,572

E. Anecdote

A woman who was experiencing a decline in her ability to function independently due to tremors, reached out for assistive technology assistance with communication and daily living tasks. The woman’s primary physician addressed medication solutions for the tremors, but no additional options were available due to the complexity of her disabilities. Her speech was difficult for others to understand due to the tremors and she was hoping to identify some assistive technology to assist with communication. She and her spouse also identified some daily living tasks that she also needed help with. To address her communication needs, the woman borrowed two different voice amplifiers. She had identified that if she used a whisper that the tremors had less of an impact on communication. Working with the Center for Independent Living staff, the device loan of the voice amplifiers was not successful in meeting her needs. These results however provided the justification needed for her health insurance to cover deep brain stimulation for her tremors. To address some of the limitations she was having with her daily living activities, she then borrowed weighted silverware and a large water bottle. Both the weighted silverware and water bottle were assistive technology devices that meet her needs, so she decided to purchase the items. The consumer reports that her energy level is better with greater access to nutrition and hydration.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 17 24 245 286
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 01 05 140 146
Subtotal 18 29 385 432
Have not made a decision 03 05 30 38
Subtotal 21 34 415 470
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 21 34 415 470
Performance on this measure 85.71% 85.29% 92.77%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 04 247 255
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 03 02 314 319
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 03 26 29
4. Subtotal 07 09 587 603
5. None of the above 00 00 03 03
6. Subtotal 07 09 590 606
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
8. Total 07 09 591 607
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.49%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 754 70.01%
Satisfied 249 23.12%
Satisfied somewhat 50 4.64%
Not at all satisfied 10 0.93%
Nonrespondent 14 1.3%
Total Surveyed 1,077
Response rate % 98.7%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 48
Hearing 100
Speech Communication 17
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 21
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 92
Daily Living 161
Environmental Adaptations 62
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 05
Computers and Related 102
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 54
Total # of Device Demonstrations 662

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 521 573 1,094
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 111 371 482
Representatives of Education 04 07 11
Representatives of Employment 00 01 01
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 05 14 19
Representative of Community Living 17 56 73
Representative of Technology 04 09 13
Total 662 1,031 1,693

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 272
Service Provider 130
Vendor 51
Repair Service 01
Others 20
Total 474

D. Anecdote

A consumer with a learning disability had learned about a reading device that could assist with reading text or print-based information out loud. She felt it would be useful at work, so a demonstration of the requested device was arranged through her local Independent Living Center. This demonstration revealed that this device, as well as similar products, would not be able to accommodate her need for text-to-speech technology. The results of the demonstration provided justification to her vocational rehabilitation counselor that a more advanced type of assistive technology would be necessary to maintain employment. The vocational rehabilitation counselor appreciated the opportunity for the device demonstration since it assisted their agency with utilizing funds to support a solution that met the employment needs versus something that did not.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 28 60 407 495
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 02 06 65 73
Subtotal 30 66 472 568
Have not made a decision 04 04 86 94
Subtotal 34 70 558 662
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 34 70 558 662
Performance on this measure 88.24% 94.29% 84.59%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,301 76.85%
Satisfied 268 15.83%
Satisfied somewhat 77 4.55%
Not at all satisfied 37 2.19%
Nonrespondent 10 0.59%
Total 1,693
Response rate % 99.41%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 06 04 2,269 2,279
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 05 04 443 452
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 04 41 46
4. Subtotal 12 12 2,753 2,777
5. None of the above 00 00 04 04
6. Subtotal 12 12 2,757 2,781
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 325 325
8. Total 12 12 3,082 3,106
9. Performance on this measure 91.67% 66.67% 88.02% 87.95%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 45 84 652 781
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 11 205 219
Subtotal 48 95 857 1,000
Have not made a decision 07 09 116 132
Subtotal 55 104 973 1,132
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 55 104 973 1,132
Performance on this measure 87.27% 91.35% 88.08% 88.34%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 95.26% 95% Met
Response Rate 70.49% 90% Not Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 1,052
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 164
Representatives of Education 204
Representatives of Employment 152
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 897
Representatives of Community Living 707
Representatives of Technology 79
Unable to Categorize 44
TOTAL 3,299

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,853 1,114 332 3,299

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 398
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 92
Combination of any/all of the above 2,073
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 731
Transition 05
Total 3,299

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Three Occupational Therapy (OT) programs have incorporated an assistive technology (AT) training session within their academic curriculum. The OT students from Marquette University, St. Mary University, and the University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee all receive in-depth training from Independence First, a subcontractor for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech), on assistive technology. This training includes a review of AT solutions and a hands-on experience utilizing over 200 AT devices. This training impacts future OT providers and ensures that knowledge of AT devices and resources will be provided for any patients that they work with in the future. Graduates from the program generally work throughout the state (and beyond) in a variety of clinical settings.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) Association Patient Support Group based in the Milwaukee area received a virtual training from staff with Independence First, a subcontractor for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech). The focus of this training was to identify solutions and strategies that would benefit individuals with ALS who are planning to remain living at home or for those who are in transition from a hospital or rehabilitation stay. The AT solutions and strategies shared also have the potential for preventative placement in a long-term care facility.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech), part of the Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources within the Wisconsin Department of Health Services, conducted an Information and Communications Technology (ICT) training for the entire staff of the Division of Public Health (DPH). This opportunity to increase awareness and skillsets around accessible information will drastically improve access to public health information and services on a statewide basis. For example, the DPH is responsible for all of the education efforts around COVID-19 including testing, vaccines, and a new tele-health program that assists Wisconsin residents with anti-viral medications following a positive COVID-19 test result. The ICT training addressed how to create accessible documents in Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, and PDF. Division staff were also made aware of best practices around procurement and the inclusion contract language with external partners or vendors to ensure that sourcing for public health programs and services include accessibility language.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 692
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 23
No known outcome at this time 16
Nonrespondent 00
Total 731
Performance Measure Percentage 97.8%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 16%
Employment 00%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 01%
Community Living 82%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 01%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

A local medical equipment manufacturer contacted Independence First, subcontractor for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech), regarding their work with prototyping a manual wheelchair with a lift seat. Staff at Independence First were asked to demonstrate the prototype device to consumers and solicit feedback. The manufacturer will be utilizing this consumer feedback to modify their design and will continue to gather consumer input as their product development continues.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee is developing a smart phone/tablet application (app) to assist occupational therapists, consumers, and family members with identifying the barriers that impact discharge from a facility or managed care setting after acquiring a disability. The goal is that the app will guide the introduction and selection of assistive technology solutions specific to an individual patient. For example, the app may be used as part of discharge planning for a patient who has had a stroke, lives alone and is returning home. The app could address concerns for this patient in the areas of food preparation, eating, dressing, and other activities of daily living. The meeting included a review of the app by staff from Independence First, subcontractor for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech), using a consumer and family member point of view. Key feedback provided to the developers included utilizing plain language versus medical terminology.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. Midstate Independent Living Choices (MILC), a subcontractor for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech), hosted an adapted ice-skating event at a local ice arena in Stevens Point, Wisconsin. Participants had access to equipment such as adapted sleds, hockey sticks, walkers, and canes to try ice skating. The event included a significant amount of public awareness through conversations with people with disabilities, family members, and the community in general. MILC was able to increase awareness of their services and the WisTech short-term device loan and demonstration program. The local news channel was also available to provide media coverage.

2. Adaptive gaming and eSports are a rapidly developing area of assistive technology, both devices and services. Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) and the Center for Independent Living for Western Wisconsin (CILWW), a WisTech subcontractor, have been working to increase awareness about resources and options for accessible gaming. This includes involving a staff member from CILWW, who serves on statewide and national groups, as an expert on accessible gaming. This staff member’s online presence on listservs, streaming channels, and social media platforms has led to greater awareness for game developers and gamers themselves regarding inclusion for people with disabilities. WisTech built upon this interest in adaptive gaming by conducting a statewide, introductory webinar on this topic.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 2,276 447 2,723
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 1,107 155 1,262
Representative of Education 50 02 52
Representative of Employment 19 07 26
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 281 40 321
Representative of Community Living 19,300 52 19,352
Representative of Technology 14 01 15
Unable to Categorize 105 00 105
Total 23,152 704 23,856

Referral Types:

Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) has utilized some unique outreach methods to increase awareness and partnerships this past fiscal year. This includes the work that our subcontracted agencies (Centers for Independent Living) are doing with recreational access for people with disabilities. This also includes work with local, national, and international organizations along with businesses to expand involvement and ensure facility access plus provision of adapted recreational equipment. Examples include working with the 2022 Women’s World Ice Hockey organizers, the Hostel Shoppe for an adapted cycling awareness event, development of adaptive gaming expertise, and Manitowoc County for adapted trail development.

Referral Sources:

Overall referrals for Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) include people with disabilities, their family members or caregivers, long-term care providers, Aging and Disability Resource Centers, educators (K-12 and post-secondary), employers, technology vendors, and the general community. Information and assistance requests are handled by Department of Health Services staff, as well as staff from the Centers for Independent Living (CIL) and CIL network. Overwhelmingly, Information and assistance referrals are from people with disabilities or their family members; with 81% falling into these two categories. WisTech has experienced an increase in the number of contacts related to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) and digital accessibility which results in additional technical assistance and trainings being provided. Requests are both internal and external to the Department of Health Services.

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The collaborative project outlined for this report involves education and development of best practices for public education through video production and dissemination. Wisconsin’s Assistive Technology Program (WisTech) partnered with the Governor’s Committee for People with Disabilities (GCPD), the Office for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (ODHH), the Office of the Secretary for the Governor, and internal Information Technology (IT) staff within the Department of Health Services (DHS). Two major video projects occurred during this past funding year. WisTech’s technical assistance involvement for the video projects described below was critical to ensure that each video was fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, specifically anyone using assistive technology to access the final products. This assistance with accessibility included guidance on the use of both open and closed captions, script development, voice overs, video descriptions for visual content, and the use of plain language. The first video project, in collaboration with the GCPD, was used to document the statewide barriers to healthcare that individuals with disabilities faced during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals who were impacted were interviewed to share their experiences related to receiving care and provider access such as limited face-to-face appointments and inability to have an advocate or others along for medical appointments. This video targeted individuals with disabilities, family and/or caregivers, the medical or healthcare community, and legislators or policy makers. The funding utilized was internal to DHS and included the staff time from DHS and the IT department as well as members of the GCPD. Governor Tony Evers participated in this video project to stress the critical nature of these barriers and assurances of improvements around the issues raised. The second video project collaboration was in partnership with ODHH and the purpose of the video was to provide education and awareness for assistive technology solutions for people who are deaf and hard of hearing. This video targets individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, family members, service providers, and the community in general, by highlighting the options available to increase independence and improve community access. The funding utilized was internal to DHS and included the staff time from all WisTech, ODHH, and the IT department.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

The primary result of this collaboration would be difficult to measure quantitively since the outcome was the establishment of best practices for the distribution of public information through video production. Additionally, since the collaborative projects, the Governor’s Office has become fully aware of the need for full access in communications with Wisconsin’s citizens. Video production in general, from this point forward, will incorporate these accessibility features. DHS staff from the IT department gained Information and Communications Technology (ICT) knowledge, which will transfer to all future projects that they are involved with. The GCPD #Access4All video project raised and validated the concerns that members of the GCPD were able to identify during the COVID-19 pandemic surrounding equal access to healthcare. #Access4All Video Link. The ODHH Assistive Technology (AT) for Hearing Loss video project increased access to general knowledge about AT devices as well as the locations where this technology can be demonstrated or loaned through the WisTech Loan and Demonstration program. ODHH AT for Deaf and Hard of Hearing video link. These partnerships were successful due to the united desire to create and distribute accessible public information. This partnership highlighted the need to consider accessibility at the very beginning of a project. For example, several key accessibility requirements were not considered when initial drafts of the videos were created. This necessitated the need for several revisions to the videos, creating extra work for everyone involved. Moving forward, WisTech and ODHH have met to discuss the creation of additional videos to highlight other areas of assistive technology. A draft script for a Vision Loss AT video has been developed in collaboration with the Office for the Blind and Visually Impaired (OBVI), also part of the Department of Health Services.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Transportation; Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Public Awareness;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:38:26 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY22 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.