Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 33 | 10 | 43 |
Approved Not made | 04 | 01 | 05 |
Rejected | 05 | 04 | 09 |
Total | 42 | 15 | 57 |
Lowest Income: | $9,084 | Highest Income: | $140,268 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$2,257,502 | 43 | $52,500 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 06 | 08 | 05 | 09 | 08 | 07 | 43 |
Percentage of Loans | 13.95% | 18.6% | 11.63% | 20.93% | 18.6% | 16.28% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 43 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 43 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 43 | $400,979 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 43 | $400,979 |
Lowest | 5% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
215 | 43 | 5% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 43 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 43 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $4,330 |
Hearing | 09 | $36,339 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 11 | $25,356 |
Daily living | 06 | $22,245 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 12 | $286,605 |
Computers and related | 02 | $2,947 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 03 | $23,157 |
Total | 45 | $400,979 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $1,429 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 3 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Concierge Service |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 6 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
C. Total Served | 6 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 6 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 6 | $270 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 6 | $270 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Social Isolation and Loneliness Project |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 1563 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 286 |
C. Total Served | 1849 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1849 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | $0 |
Hearing | 0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 5320 | $309,627 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 5320 | $309,627 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 67 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 5 |
C. Total Served | 72 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 72 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 81 | $11,531 |
Hearing | 178 | $32,945 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 0 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 259 | $44,476 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Cooperative Buying Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 257 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 5 |
C. Total Served | 262 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 262 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 2 | $389 | $110 | $279 |
Hearing | 1 | $139 | $45 | $94 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 133 | $29,130 | $11,462 | $17,668 |
Daily living | 243 | $27,779 | $9,785 | $17,994 |
Environmental adaptations | 3 | $1,141 | $672 | $469 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 382 | $58,578 | $22,074 | $36,504 |
Steven is a senior who lives in rural Oregon and has not had much experience using technology. He has a flip phone and prior to working with the State AT Program, he would spend a little time on a computer at his local library. Then the library closed due to the pandemic and Steven was shut off from the world around him. When Steven learned about the possibility of receiving his own laptop through a Technology Pilot Program being administered through the State AT Program, he quickly signed up, acquired internet service in his home, and was so excited when the laptop arrived. Steven shares “Before the program I was able to access the internet at my local library for just an hour at a time, but that wasn’t enough time to take advantage of what a computer could do for me. Since receiving my own laptop, I message my doctor with questions and stay on top of upcoming appointments. I have re-engaged with hobbies; finding affordable fishing and hunting gear and organizing bus tickets so I can plan trips to new places. I am able to keep up on current political happenings through online research, and have even reconnected with old high school friends! It’s amazing the opportunities this laptop has provided.”
Earlier this year Julie and her husband visited the AT Program Marketplace to explore new manual wheelchairs. Her current chair was worn, and following a recent stroke it was uncomfortable and difficult to maneuver. The hospital had provided a list of local durable medical equipment providers and her husband “made the rounds.” During this exploration he visited the AT Program storefront and noticed the new manual wheelchairs were affordably priced and the used chairs were in better condition than the one she had. During this visit, Julie selected a new manual wheelchair with a seat width that accommodated her physically but was disappointed to find the chair was a little too tall. ATI staff quickly showed them how to adjust the height, allowing her to use the chair more independently. Julie and her husband expressed their appreciation for the individualized service they received.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 17 | 2,202 | 2,222 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 03 | 18 | 2,205 | 2,226 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 03 | 18 | 2,211 | 2,232 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 03 | 18 | 2,211 | 2,232 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.73% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 362 | 16.22% |
Satisfied | 1,869 | 83.74% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.04% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 2,232 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 84 |
C. Total | 84 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 84 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 10 | $11,769 | $1,025 | $10,744 |
Hearing | 01 | $200 | $0 | $200 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 06 | $2,295 | $0 | $2,295 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 52 | $80,086 | $1,447 | $78,639 |
Daily Living | 13 | $2,167 | $195 | $1,972 |
Environmental Adaptations | 11 | $5,255 | $575 | $4,680 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $48 | $25 | $23 |
Total | 94 | $101,820 | $3,267 | $98,553 |
Larry’s visit to the Oregon AT Program’s storefront came with a story. His brother recently experienced a stroke and now experiences vertigo, frequently forcing him to suddenly sit down on the floor to prevent falling. Once on the floor, his brother lacks the physical strength to stand back up, and Larry is not able to assist his brother unaided. Larry had previously utilized local emergency services to assist his brother but this was not a viable long-term solution. Larry went searching for an assistive device that would allow him to lift his brother back to his feet. Upon reading about patient lifts on the Oregon AT Program’s website, he decided to stop in and see if a patient lift was right for him. Larry selected a gently used patient lift donated by an individual whose family member had passed. He was pleased to see even on his fixed income he could afford the lift, as he was saving almost $2,000. Later that week, Larry called and thanked staff again, as he had successfully used the lift to help his brother stand.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 13 | 69 | 84 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 13 | 69 | 84 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 02 | 13 | 69 | 84 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 02 | 13 | 69 | 84 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 70 | 83.33% |
Satisfied | 14 | 16.67% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 84 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 104 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 20 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 00 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 00 |
Total | 124 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 59 | 06 | 65 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 21 | 05 | 26 |
Representative of Education | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representative of Employment | 16 | 08 | 24 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representatives of Community Living | 05 | 00 | 05 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 104 | 20 | 124 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 06 | 02 | 08 |
Hearing | 11 | 00 | 11 |
Speech Communication | 07 | 00 | 07 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 | 01 | 08 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 62 | 09 | 71 |
Daily Living | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Environmental Adaptations | 25 | 13 | 38 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 121 | 25 | 146 |
Angelique contacted the Oregon AT Program looking for a speech device to allow Ricky, her four-year old son, to communicate with his family, community, and pre-school peers. While exploring a variety of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices during a demonstration, a portable, AAC device, with pre-recorded messages showed the most promise to allow Ricky basic verbal communication. Angelique then borrowed the device to determine whether it would work in her son’s daily interactions, before making a purchasing decision. During the month, Ricky worked with his speech language therapist, and together they determined that this style of AAC device would be a great fit for Ricky’s communication needs.Angelique contacted the Oregon AT Program looking for a speech device to allow Ricky, her four-year old son, to communicate with his family, community, and pre-school peers. While exploring a variety of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices during a demonstration, a portable, AAC device, with pre-recorded messages showed the most promise to allow Ricky basic verbal communication. Angelique then borrowed the device to determine whether it would work in her son’s daily interactions, before making a purchasing decision. During the month, Ricky worked with his speech language therapist, and together they determined that this style of AAC device would be a great fit for Ricky’s communication needs.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 08 | 51 | 45 | 104 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 08 | 51 | 45 | 104 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 08 | 51 | 45 | 104 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 08 | 51 | 45 | 104 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 13 | 07 | 20 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 13 | 07 | 20 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 13 | 07 | 20 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 13 | 07 | 20 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 60 | 48.39% |
Satisfied | 64 | 51.61% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 124 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 73 |
Hearing | 32 |
Speech Communication | 14 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 14 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 189 |
Daily Living | 199 |
Environmental Adaptations | 47 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
Computers and Related | 93 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 08 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 670 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 485 | 20 | 505 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 165 | 49 | 214 |
Representatives of Education | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Representatives of Employment | 03 | 04 | 07 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 06 | 14 | 20 |
Representative of Community Living | 06 | 10 | 16 |
Representative of Technology | 02 | 05 | 07 |
Total | 670 | 102 | 772 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 432 |
Service Provider | 54 |
Vendor | 1,093 |
Repair Service | 94 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 1,673 |
James, a retiree, thoroughly enjoys reading military history. However, his ongoing vision loss makes reading challenging so he contacted the AT Program for a demonstration of low vision devices. James is not a fan of audiobooks, and while he was interested in any technology allowing him to continue his hobby, he was especially interested in exploring low-vision eyewear that uses virtual reality technology. His ophthalmologist had mentioned this device because he would be able to hold his book and read from his easy chair. However, given the price of this technology James wanted to be certain the device would work for him before investing almost $4,000. James learned to set up the device but when he tried to use it in his preferred easy chair the device was too sensitive to make reading enjoyable. Other devices were also not terribly satisfactory for reading print novels however, James was open to exploring accessible digital books which he could read on either his tablet or e-reader by adjusting the text size. While disappointed the eyewear device would not suit his needs, he was glad to have been spared the effort of buying one only to discover it would not work for him.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 07 | 146 | 516 | 669 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 07 | 146 | 517 | 670 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 07 | 146 | 517 | 670 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 07 | 146 | 517 | 670 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 480 | 62.18% |
Satisfied | 291 | 37.69% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.13% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 772 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 43 | 2,278 | 2,326 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 44 | 2,281 | 2,330 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 44 | 2,287 | 2,336 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 05 | 44 | 2,287 | 2,336 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.65% | 99.66% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 15 | 197 | 561 | 773 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 15 | 197 | 562 | 774 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 15 | 197 | 562 | 774 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 15 | 197 | 562 | 774 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.94% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 100% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 537 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 40 |
Representatives of Education | 66 |
Representatives of Employment | 40 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 40 |
Representatives of Community Living | 472 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,195 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
842 | 353 | 00 | 1,195 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,072 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 83 |
Transition | 40 |
Total | 1,195 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Through an exciting partnership with the State Unit on Aging, the Oregon AT Program is implementing a Technology Pilot Project. This Project seeks to reduce social isolation and loneliness of seniors and people with disabilities by providing technology-related services including computers, tablets, assistive technologies, internet access, as well as remote training services. The large number of referrals received from Oregon’s Vietnamese communities have been especially encouraging. Since many members of this community prefer in-person assistance, the team shifted gears, solicited support from a highly valued Vietnamese interpreter and brought the training sessions directly to these communities. Members of the Vietnamese community attending the first in-person training expressed overwhelmingly positive feedback and appreciation.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
More than forty people attended a virtual session hosted by Northwest Senior and Disability Services as part of their celebration of May’s Older American Month. This session covered daily living tools, a range of medical reminders and other smart technology to assist individuals transitioning to an assisted lifestyle while aging in place. The session prompted a lively discussion about the balance of privacy and support; how much privacy an individual must surrender so they feel supported yet independent. This experience will help participants make better informed and more effective assistive technology decisions.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
The Oregon AT Program provided ICT training to 18 members of the Transition Technical Assistance Network (TTAN), a state level organization that works with transitioning youth. This interactive webinar focused on making accessible source documents using Microsoft Office and converting the source documents into accessible PDFs and other forms of shared media.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 83 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 83 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 26% |
---|---|
Employment | 26% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 25% |
Community Living | 22% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 01% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Many counselors at Oregon Vocational Rehabilitation Services still work from home. With limited office contact, new counselors are often unaware of the services provided to Vocational Rehabilitation Services by ATI and the referral process for services. One counselor had several clients who could use assistive technology to accomplish tasks required in their dream jobs but who were not aware of what was available. In a series of emails, remote meetings, and phone calls, this counselor was able to set up demonstrations for his clients to explore their options. He could assist those ready to open these career doors in using the assistive technology referral services including detailed person-centered assessments and training . Through this experience this counselor learned this aspect of caring would make his caseload a bit easier to manage.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Mark is a case manager for Oregon’s Aging and People with Disabilities organization. His client is retiring and lives in a remote part of the Cascade mountains whose CCTV system has a uniquely integrated Optical Character Recognition. A flaw in the firmware of the user’s device caused the whole machine to crash. His equipment needed a special update to work with this area’s CCTV system. There was no available documentation so Mark reached out to the AT Program on behalf of his client for assistance. He brought the CCTV to the AT Program office to reinstall the firmware utilizing resources not available in the field. This complicated multi-step process required a special cable connecting the CCTV to a Windows-based PC, putting the PC into a special data transfer mode, and restarting the devices in a specific sequence. Mark relayed the gratitude of his client who relies on the CCTV daily, noting the expensive device would have become unusable without Oregon’s Statewide AT Program
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. This year the pandemic restrictions eased and the Oregon AT Program staff eagerly returned to in-person public awareness events to increase awareness about assistive technology devices and services. On one occasion, this networking led to an opportunity to host a table during a small community event to promote independent living through the use of assistive technology. Here, specialists connected with more than 125 individuals, demonstrating a variety of daily living aids, as well as technologies to assist individuals who experience difficulties with hearing, vision, and memory recall. In a follow up conversation, one attendee said that she was so excited to learn about adaptive eating utensils she contacted the distributor that very day.
2. The Oregon AT Program also returned to in-person presentations starting in May 2022 at the Forum on Aging in Rural Oregon. In one session, an AT specialist hosted a discussion and interactive technology exhibit informing attendees how to access a myriad of services, information, and technology even in rural Oregon locations far from urban resources. Attendees left with a wealth of new information to share with their clients to obtain needed affordable medical equipment and assistive technologies, how to recycle these items within their own communities to further reduce costs for others, how to obtain funding for items not otherwise affordable, and how to schedule appointments with the AT Program for more hands-on demonstrations with specific tools to ensure the maximum benefit from the investment.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,797 | 567 | 2,364 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 367 | 166 | 533 |
Representative of Education | 89 | 26 | 115 |
Representative of Employment | 76 | 12 | 88 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 133 | 43 | 176 |
Representative of Community Living | 203 | 84 | 287 |
Representative of Technology | 15 | 00 | 15 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 2,680 | 898 | 3,578 |
Strengthening agency collaborations, returning to in-person outreach activities and maintaining employment related agency relationships has resulted in increased referrals throughout the year.
Data collected throughout the year show the majority of referrals came from Disability & Advocacy Entities/Providers (37%), Program Area Entities/Providers (30%) and Awareness & Outreach Initiatives (22%).
The AT Program is not able to report comparative referral data because this is first year such data has been collected.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
To reduce social isolation and loneliness, the Oregon AT Program partnered with the State Unit on Aging and ADRC offices throughout Oregon to provide technology and related services to seniors and individuals with disabilities. This pilot project is being paid for by the federally funded ADRC COVID-19 Relief Grant from the Administration on Community Living (ACL), as well as funding from the American Rescue Plan (ARP). Throughout the year 447 Oregonians were referred to the Social Isolation and Loneliness project.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Qualified participants received over 1,270 technology related services including robotic pets, computers, tablets, assistive technologies, internet access, as well as remote and in-person training services. This project allows participants to connect virtually with family, friends, and their medical team. It also allows participants to access community events.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
State Financing; Training; Information & Assistance; Technical Assistance;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The Oregon AT Program is a SLATE (State Leaders of Assistive Technology in Education) member. The group meets monthly to provide opportunities for networking and professional development for state-level assistive technology programs in preschool and K-12 educational environments.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
In virtual meetings, SLATE members share innovative ideas, discuss issues common to state-level AT programs, and act as a professional learning community for members who have state and regional responsibilities to support AT programs in K-12 educational settings.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community);
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Technical Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
An OSATP Specialist is a member of the State Rehabilitation Council. The member is serving on the committee responsible for working with the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency to prepare and update their annual State Plan.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Updates to VR's State Plan strengthens the partnership between VR and the State AT Program, and specifically addresses the need to ensure assistive technology devices and services are considered at each stage of the VR process.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The National Center on Accessible Educational Materials for Learning (AEM Center) is a technical assistance center led by CAST and funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The Center’s goal is to increase the availability and use of AEM and accessible technologies by individuals with disabilities in early learning, K-12, higher education, and workforce development settings. Oregon, along with six other states, have been participating in a national AEM Cohort for the past two years.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
As a member of this Cohort, the Oregon AT Program serves on the Workforce Development Team. With the National Center’s expert assistance, each state in the AEM Cohort is working to develop a coordinated system for providing AEM and accessible technologies to strengthen transitions into and out of K-12 for students with disabilities who need accessible materials and technologies.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Education
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $129,446 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $21,203 | State Financing | True |
Public/State Agency | $293,849 | State Financing | True |
Amount: $444,498 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:35:28 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)