National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Oregon 2022

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Oregon Statewide Assistive Technology Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.accesstechnologiesinc.org
Mailing Address:
2225 Lancaster Drive NE
City:
Salem
State:
OR
Zip Code:
97305
Program Email:
info@accesstechnologiesinc.org
Phone:
503-361-1201
TTY:
503-370--4530

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
Mailing Address:
500 Summer Street NE E87
City:
Salem
State:
OR
Zip Code:
97301
Program URL:
www.oregon.gov/dhs

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Access Technologies, Inc.
Mailing Address:
2225 Lancaster Drive NE
City
Salem
State:
OR
Zip Code:
97305
Program URL:
www.accesstechnologiesinc.org

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Brooks, Laurie
Title:
President
Phone:
503-361-1201
E-mail:
info@accesstechnologiesinc.org
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Ozols, Keith
Title:
VR Director
Phone:
503-945-5679
E-mail:
keith.s.ozols@dhsoha.state.or.us
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Brooks, Laurie
Title:
President
Phone:
503-361-1201
E-mail:
info@accesstechnologiesinc.org

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Ozols, Keith
Title:
VR Director
Phone:
503-945-5679
E-mail:
keith.s.ozols@dhsoha.state.or.us

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 33 10 43
Approved Not made 04 01 05
Rejected 05 04 09
Total 42 15 57

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $9,084 Highest Income: $140,268

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$2,257,502 43 $52,500

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 06 08 05 09 08 07 43
Percentage of Loans 13.95% 18.6% 11.63% 20.93% 18.6% 16.28% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 43 100%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 43 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 43 $400,979
Partnership Loans 00 $0
Total 43 $400,979

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 5%
Highest 5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
215 43 5%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 43
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 43

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 02 $4,330
Hearing 09 $36,339
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 11 $25,356
Daily living 06 $22,245
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 12 $286,605
Computers and related 02 $2,947
Recreation, sports, and leisure 03 $23,157
Total 45 $400,979

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 00
Net loss for loans in default $1,429

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 3
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Other: Concierge Service

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)6
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)0
C. Total Served6

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures6

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 0$0
Hearing 0$0
Speech communication0$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning6$270
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 0$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total6$270

Activity 2
How would you describe this state financing activity?Other: Social Isolation and Loneliness Project

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)1563
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)286
C. Total Served1849

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures1849

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 0$0
Hearing 0$0
Speech communication0$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning0$0
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 5320$309,627
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total5320$309,627

Activity 3
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)67
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)5
C. Total Served72

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures72

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 81$11,531
Hearing 178$32,945
Speech communication0$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning0$0
Daily living 0$0
Environmental adaptations0$0
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0
Computers and related 0$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure0$0
Total259$44,476



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Cooperative Buying Program

2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)257
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)5
C. Total Served262

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures262

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber ProvidedTotal Estimated
Current Retail
Purchase Price
Total Price for
Which Devices
Were Sold
Savings
to Consumers
Vision 2$389$110$279
Hearing 1$139$45$94
Speech communication 0$0$0$0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 0$0$0$0
Mobility, seating and positioning 133$29,130$11,462$17,668
Daily living 243$27,779$9,785$17,994
Environmental adaptations 3$1,141$672$469
Vehicle modification and transportation 0$0$0$0
Computers and related 0$0$0$0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 0$0$0$0
Total 382$58,578$22,074$36,504


D. Anecdote

Steven is a senior who lives in rural Oregon and has not had much experience using technology. He has a flip phone and prior to working with the State AT Program, he would spend a little time on a computer at his local library. Then the library closed due to the pandemic and Steven was shut off from the world around him. When Steven learned about the possibility of receiving his own laptop through a Technology Pilot Program being administered through the State AT Program, he quickly signed up, acquired internet service in his home, and was so excited when the laptop arrived. Steven shares “Before the program I was able to access the internet at my local library for just an hour at a time, but that wasn’t enough time to take advantage of what a computer could do for me. Since receiving my own laptop, I message my doctor with questions and stay on top of upcoming appointments. I have re-engaged with hobbies; finding affordable fishing and hunting gear and organizing bus tickets so I can plan trips to new places. I am able to keep up on current political happenings through online research, and have even reconnected with old high school friends! It’s amazing the opportunities this laptop has provided.”

Older man, wearing glasses, using a laptop.
Impact Area

Earlier this year Julie and her husband visited the AT Program Marketplace to explore new manual wheelchairs. Her current chair was worn, and following a recent stroke it was uncomfortable and difficult to maneuver. The hospital had provided a list of local durable medical equipment providers and her husband “made the rounds.” During this exploration he visited the AT Program storefront and noticed the new manual wheelchairs were affordably priced and the used chairs were in better condition than the one she had. During this visit, Julie selected a new manual wheelchair with a seat width that accommodated her physically but was disappointed to find the chair was a little too tall. ATI staff quickly showed them how to adjust the height, allowing her to use the chair more independently. Julie and her husband expressed their appreciation for the individualized service they received.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 03 17 2,202 2,222
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 01 02
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 03 18 2,205 2,226
5. None of the above 00 00 06 06
6. Subtotal 03 18 2,211 2,232
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 03 18 2,211 2,232
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.73%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 362 16.22%
Satisfied 1,869 83.74%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.04%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 2,232
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 84
C. Total 84

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 84

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 10 $11,769 $1,025 $10,744
Hearing 01 $200 $0 $200
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 06 $2,295 $0 $2,295
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 52 $80,086 $1,447 $78,639
Daily Living 13 $2,167 $195 $1,972
Environmental Adaptations 11 $5,255 $575 $4,680
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 $48 $25 $23
Total 94 $101,820 $3,267 $98,553

D. Anecdote

Larry’s visit to the Oregon AT Program’s storefront came with a story. His brother recently experienced a stroke and now experiences vertigo, frequently forcing him to suddenly sit down on the floor to prevent falling. Once on the floor, his brother lacks the physical strength to stand back up, and Larry is not able to assist his brother unaided. Larry had previously utilized local emergency services to assist his brother but this was not a viable long-term solution. Larry went searching for an assistive device that would allow him to lift his brother back to his feet. Upon reading about patient lifts on the Oregon AT Program’s website, he decided to stop in and see if a patient lift was right for him. Larry selected a gently used patient lift donated by an individual whose family member had passed. He was pleased to see even on his fixed income he could afford the lift, as he was saving almost $2,000. Later that week, Larry called and thanked staff again, as he had successfully used the lift to help his brother stand.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 02 13 69 84
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 02 13 69 84
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 02 13 69 84
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 02 13 69 84
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 70 83.33%
Satisfied 14 16.67%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 84
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 104
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 20
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 00
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 00
Total 124

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 59 06 65
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 21 05 26
Representative of Education 02 00 02
Representative of Employment 16 08 24
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 01 00 01
Representatives of Community Living 05 00 05
Representatives of Technology 00 01 01
Total 104 20 124

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 06 02 08
Hearing 11 00 11
Speech Communication 07 00 07
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 07 01 08
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 62 09 71
Daily Living 00 00 00
Environmental Adaptations 25 13 38
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 03 00 03
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 00 00
Total 121 25 146

E. Anecdote

Angelique contacted the Oregon AT Program looking for a speech device to allow Ricky, her four-year old son, to communicate with his family, community, and pre-school peers. While exploring a variety of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices during a demonstration, a portable, AAC device, with pre-recorded messages showed the most promise to allow Ricky basic verbal communication. Angelique then borrowed the device to determine whether it would work in her son’s daily interactions, before making a purchasing decision. During the month, Ricky worked with his speech language therapist, and together they determined that this style of AAC device would be a great fit for Ricky’s communication needs.Angelique contacted the Oregon AT Program looking for a speech device to allow Ricky, her four-year old son, to communicate with his family, community, and pre-school peers. While exploring a variety of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) devices during a demonstration, a portable, AAC device, with pre-recorded messages showed the most promise to allow Ricky basic verbal communication. Angelique then borrowed the device to determine whether it would work in her son’s daily interactions, before making a purchasing decision. During the month, Ricky worked with his speech language therapist, and together they determined that this style of AAC device would be a great fit for Ricky’s communication needs.

Young child exploring an AAC device to use for his communication needs.
Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 08 51 45 104
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 08 51 45 104
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 08 51 45 104
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 08 51 45 104
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 13 07 20
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 13 07 20
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 13 07 20
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 13 07 20
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 60 48.39%
Satisfied 64 51.61%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 124
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 73
Hearing 32
Speech Communication 14
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 14
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 189
Daily Living 199
Environmental Adaptations 47
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 01
Computers and Related 93
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 08
Total # of Device Demonstrations 670

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 485 20 505
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 165 49 214
Representatives of Education 03 00 03
Representatives of Employment 03 04 07
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 06 14 20
Representative of Community Living 06 10 16
Representative of Technology 02 05 07
Total 670 102 772

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 432
Service Provider 54
Vendor 1,093
Repair Service 94
Others 00
Total 1,673

D. Anecdote

James, a retiree, thoroughly enjoys reading military history. However, his ongoing vision loss makes reading challenging so he contacted the AT Program for a demonstration of low vision devices. James is not a fan of audiobooks, and while he was interested in any technology allowing him to continue his hobby, he was especially interested in exploring low-vision eyewear that uses virtual reality technology. His ophthalmologist had mentioned this device because he would be able to hold his book and read from his easy chair. However, given the price of this technology James wanted to be certain the device would work for him before investing almost $4,000. James learned to set up the device but when he tried to use it in his preferred easy chair the device was too sensitive to make reading enjoyable. Other devices were also not terribly satisfactory for reading print novels however, James was open to exploring accessible digital books which he could read on either his tablet or e-reader by adjusting the text size. While disappointed the eyewear device would not suit his needs, he was glad to have been spared the effort of buying one only to discover it would not work for him.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 07 146 516 669
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 07 146 517 670
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 07 146 517 670
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 07 146 517 670
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 480 62.18%
Satisfied 291 37.69%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.13%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 772
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 43 2,278 2,326
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 01 02
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 05 44 2,281 2,330
5. None of the above 00 00 06 06
6. Subtotal 05 44 2,287 2,336
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 05 44 2,287 2,336
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.65% 99.66%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 15 197 561 773
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 15 197 562 774
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 15 197 562 774
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 15 197 562 774
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100% 100%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.94% 95% Met
Response Rate 100% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 537
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 40
Representatives of Education 66
Representatives of Employment 40
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 40
Representatives of Community Living 472
Representatives of Technology 00
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 1,195

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
842 353 00 1,195

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 1,072
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 83
Transition 40
Total 1,195

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Through an exciting partnership with the State Unit on Aging, the Oregon AT Program is implementing a Technology Pilot Project. This Project seeks to reduce social isolation and loneliness of seniors and people with disabilities by providing technology-related services including computers, tablets, assistive technologies, internet access, as well as remote training services. The large number of referrals received from Oregon’s Vietnamese communities have been especially encouraging. Since many members of this community prefer in-person assistance, the team shifted gears, solicited support from a highly valued Vietnamese interpreter and brought the training sessions directly to these communities. Members of the Vietnamese community attending the first in-person training expressed overwhelmingly positive feedback and appreciation.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

More than forty people attended a virtual session hosted by Northwest Senior and Disability Services as part of their celebration of May’s Older American Month. This session covered daily living tools, a range of medical reminders and other smart technology to assist individuals transitioning to an assisted lifestyle while aging in place. The session prompted a lively discussion about the balance of privacy and support; how much privacy an individual must surrender so they feel supported yet independent. This experience will help participants make better informed and more effective assistive technology decisions.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

The Oregon AT Program provided ICT training to 18 members of the Transition Technical Assistance Network (TTAN), a state level organization that works with transitioning youth. This interactive webinar focused on making accessible source documents using Microsoft Office and converting the source documents into accessible PDFs and other forms of shared media.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 83
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 83
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 26%
Employment 26%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 25%
Community Living 22%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 01%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Many counselors at Oregon Vocational Rehabilitation Services still work from home. With limited office contact, new counselors are often unaware of the services provided to Vocational Rehabilitation Services by ATI and the referral process for services. One counselor had several clients who could use assistive technology to accomplish tasks required in their dream jobs but who were not aware of what was available. In a series of emails, remote meetings, and phone calls, this counselor was able to set up demonstrations for his clients to explore their options. He could assist those ready to open these career doors in using the assistive technology referral services including detailed person-centered assessments and training . Through this experience this counselor learned this aspect of caring would make his caseload a bit easier to manage.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Mark is a case manager for Oregon’s Aging and People with Disabilities organization. His client is retiring and lives in a remote part of the Cascade mountains whose CCTV system has a uniquely integrated Optical Character Recognition. A flaw in the firmware of the user’s device caused the whole machine to crash. His equipment needed a special update to work with this area’s CCTV system. There was no available documentation so Mark reached out to the AT Program on behalf of his client for assistance. He brought the CCTV to the AT Program office to reinstall the firmware utilizing resources not available in the field. This complicated multi-step process required a special cable connecting the CCTV to a Windows-based PC, putting the PC into a special data transfer mode, and restarting the devices in a specific sequence. Mark relayed the gratitude of his client who relies on the CCTV daily, noting the expensive device would have become unusable without Oregon’s Statewide AT Program

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. This year the pandemic restrictions eased and the Oregon AT Program staff eagerly returned to in-person public awareness events to increase awareness about assistive technology devices and services. On one occasion, this networking led to an opportunity to host a table during a small community event to promote independent living through the use of assistive technology. Here, specialists connected with more than 125 individuals, demonstrating a variety of daily living aids, as well as technologies to assist individuals who experience difficulties with hearing, vision, and memory recall. In a follow up conversation, one attendee said that she was so excited to learn about adaptive eating utensils she contacted the distributor that very day.

2. The Oregon AT Program also returned to in-person presentations starting in May 2022 at the Forum on Aging in Rural Oregon. In one session, an AT specialist hosted a discussion and interactive technology exhibit informing attendees how to access a myriad of services, information, and technology even in rural Oregon locations far from urban resources. Attendees left with a wealth of new information to share with their clients to obtain needed affordable medical equipment and assistive technologies, how to recycle these items within their own communities to further reduce costs for others, how to obtain funding for items not otherwise affordable, and how to schedule appointments with the AT Program for more hands-on demonstrations with specific tools to ensure the maximum benefit from the investment.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 1,797 567 2,364
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 367 166 533
Representative of Education 89 26 115
Representative of Employment 76 12 88
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 133 43 176
Representative of Community Living 203 84 287
Representative of Technology 15 00 15
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 2,680 898 3,578

Referral Types:

Strengthening agency collaborations, returning to in-person outreach activities and maintaining employment related agency relationships has resulted in increased referrals throughout the year.

Referral Sources:

Data collected throughout the year show the majority of referrals came from Disability & Advocacy Entities/Providers (37%), Program Area Entities/Providers (30%) and Awareness & Outreach Initiatives (22%).

Notes:

The AT Program is not able to report comparative referral data because this is first year such data has been collected.

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 2

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

To reduce social isolation and loneliness, the Oregon AT Program partnered with the State Unit on Aging and ADRC offices throughout Oregon to provide technology and related services to seniors and individuals with disabilities. This pilot project is being paid for by the federally funded ADRC COVID-19 Relief Grant from the Administration on Community Living (ACL), as well as funding from the American Rescue Plan (ARP). Throughout the year 447 Oregonians were referred to the Social Isolation and Loneliness project.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

Qualified participants received over 1,270 technology related services including robotic pets, computers, tablets, assistive technologies, internet access, as well as remote and in-person training services. This project allows participants to connect virtually with family, friends, and their medical team. It also allows participants to access community events.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

State Financing; Training; Information & Assistance; Technical Assistance;

A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Oregon AT Program is a SLATE (State Leaders of Assistive Technology in Education) member. The group meets monthly to provide opportunities for networking and professional development for state-level assistive technology programs in preschool and K-12 educational environments.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

In virtual meetings, SLATE members share innovative ideas, discuss issues common to state-level AT programs, and act as a professional learning community for members who have state and regional responsibilities to support AT programs in K-12 educational settings.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community);

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Technical Assistance;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 02

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

An OSATP Specialist is a member of the State Rehabilitation Council. The member is serving on the committee responsible for working with the State Vocational Rehabilitation agency to prepare and update their annual State Plan.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

Updates to VR's State Plan strengthens the partnership between VR and the State AT Program, and specifically addresses the need to ensure assistive technology devices and services are considered at each stage of the VR process.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation


B.2 State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The National Center on Accessible Educational Materials for Learning (AEM Center) is a technical assistance center led by CAST and funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The Center’s goal is to increase the availability and use of AEM and accessible technologies by individuals with disabilities in early learning, K-12, higher education, and workforce development settings. Oregon, along with six other states, have been participating in a national AEM Cohort for the past two years.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

As a member of this Cohort, the Oregon AT Program serves on the Workforce Development Team. With the National Center’s expert assistance, each state in the AEM Cohort is working to develop a coordinated system for providing AEM and accessible technologies to strengthen transitions into and out of K-12 for students with disabilities who need accessible materials and technologies.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Education

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Federal$129,446State FinancingTrue
Public/State Agency$21,203State FinancingTrue
Public/State Agency$293,849State FinancingTrue
Amount: $444,498

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:35:28 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY22 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.