National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Indiana 2022
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 08 | 01 | 09 |
| Approved Not made | 02 | 00 | 02 |
| Rejected | 03 | 00 | 03 |
| Total | 13 | 01 | 14 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $5,400 | Highest Income: | $85,000 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $246,877 | 09 | $27,431 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 02 | 03 | 02 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 09 |
| Percentage of Loans | 22.22% | 33.33% | 22.22% | 11.11% | 0% | 11.11% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 09 | 100% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 09 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 09 | $116,013 |
| Total | 09 | $116,013 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 2.99% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 3.75% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 09 | 3.35777777777778% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 09 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 09 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 02 | $7,951 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 02 | $38,261 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 05 | $69,801 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 09 | $116,013 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
|---|
D. Anecdote
A woman called to inquire about an AFP loan for driver evaluation services and subsequent modification/training services. As a right-leg amputee, the woman needed a driver evaluation to help determine appropriate vehicle modifications. Once the driver evaluation is completed, her plan is to receive another AFP loan to pay for the necessary vehicle modifications and receive training services. INDATA worked with her and the bank to simplify her payment plan and will combine both loans into one payment.
A woman called INDATA to inquire about an AFP loan to purchase an Action Trackchair. The Action Trackchair is an outdoor wheelchair with treads for traversing rough terrain. The woman lives on a large property in southern Indiana and had been unable to access her property since having her right leg amputated. Her AFP loan was approved in December, and she was able to purchase the Trackchair and is now able to enjoy her property and the outdoors.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 08 | 09 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 08 | 09 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 08 | 09 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 01 | 08 | 09 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 09 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 09 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 00 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 259 |
| C. Total | 259 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 259 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 13 | $36,425 | $0 | $36,425 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | $988 | $0 | $988 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Computers and Related | 244 | $127,497 | $0 | $127,497 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 259 | $164,910 | $0 | $164,910 |
D. Anecdote
A woman with end-stage Renal Disease was referred to the INDATA reuse program by her medical provider. The woman desperately needed an internet-connected device to improve communication with her medical team and attend virtual support group meetings offered by her provider. An internet-capable laptop computer with a built-in microphone and camera was provided to her along with basic training on the device features and how to connect to WIFI. The woman was grateful for the assistance and pleased with the support provided.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 58 | 23 | 101 | 182 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 14 | 11 | 28 | 53 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 07 | 06 | 11 | 24 |
| 4. Subtotal | 79 | 40 | 140 | 259 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 79 | 40 | 140 | 259 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 79 | 40 | 140 | 259 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 243 | 93.82% |
| Satisfied | 13 | 5.02% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 1.16% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 259 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 360 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 28 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 55 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 178 |
| Total | 621 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Individuals with Disabilities | 114 | 25 | 139 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 92 | 55 | 147 |
| Representative of Education | 10 | 17 | 27 |
| Representative of Employment | 07 | 00 | 07 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 107 | 34 | 141 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| Representatives of Technology | 20 | 120 | 140 |
| Total | 360 | 261 | 621 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
| Vision | 209 | 40 | 249 |
| Hearing | 11 | 03 | 14 |
| Speech Communication | 69 | 15 | 84 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 56 | 44 | 100 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 37 | 00 | 37 |
| Daily Living | 103 | 07 | 110 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 27 | 05 | 32 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 328 | 144 | 472 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 18 | 03 | 21 |
| Total | 858 | 261 | 1,119 |
E. Anecdote
A First Steps speech-language pathologist called the INDATA lending library interested in borrowing an Accent 1400 communication device to trial with one of her clients. She wanted to use the device during speech sessions to assess the benefit of high-tech AAC support for her client to independently express their wants/needs and to develop communication skills. After borrowing the device, she expressed her appreciation and said the loaner “played an important role in determining the most appropriate speech system for her client.”
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 165 | 78 | 86 | 329 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 05 | 16 | 23 |
| Subtotal | 167 | 83 | 102 | 352 |
| Have not made a decision | 02 | 03 | 03 | 08 |
| Subtotal | 169 | 86 | 105 | 360 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 169 | 86 | 105 | 360 |
| Performance on this measure | 98.82% | 96.51% | 97.14% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 25 | 05 | 16 | 46 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 63 | 128 | 09 | 200 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 10 | 01 | 04 | 15 |
| 4. Subtotal | 98 | 134 | 29 | 261 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 98 | 134 | 29 | 261 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 98 | 134 | 29 | 261 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 598 | 96.3% |
| Satisfied | 20 | 3.22% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.48% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 621 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 51 |
| Hearing | 03 |
| Speech Communication | 07 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 04 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 |
| Daily Living | 12 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 06 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 76 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
| Total # of Device Demonstrations | 168 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 168 | 00 | 168 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 00 | 252 | 252 |
| Representatives of Education | 00 | 06 | 06 |
| Representatives of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Representative of Community Living | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 168 | 260 | 428 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 08 |
| Service Provider | 05 |
| Vendor | 02 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 02 |
| Total | 17 |
D. Anecdote
A gentleman with low vision contacted INDATA and requested assistance with public transportation. He was working downtown and having trouble reading bus numbers and street signs. A demo was set up and two solutions, a Ruby XLHD video magnifier and the Seeing AI app, were identified and implemented to help overcome these issues. These solutions helped improve his confidence and experience by allowing him to magnify and read street signs and maps while en route to and from work.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 31 | 10 | 125 | 166 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 31 | 10 | 126 | 167 |
| Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| Subtotal | 31 | 10 | 127 | 168 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 31 | 10 | 127 | 168 |
| Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.21% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 423 | 98.83% |
| Satisfied | 04 | 0.93% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.23% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 428 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 83 | 29 | 125 | 237 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 77 | 139 | 37 | 253 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 17 | 07 | 15 | 39 |
| 4. Subtotal | 177 | 175 | 177 | 529 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 177 | 175 | 177 | 529 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 177 | 175 | 177 | 529 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 90.4% | 96% | 91.53% | 92.63% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 196 | 88 | 211 | 495 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 05 | 17 | 24 |
| Subtotal | 198 | 93 | 228 | 519 |
| Have not made a decision | 02 | 03 | 04 | 09 |
| Subtotal | 200 | 96 | 232 | 528 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 200 | 96 | 232 | 528 |
| Performance on this measure | 99% | 96.88% | 98.28% | 98.3% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
| Met/Not Met | Met | |||
Overall Satisfaction Rating
| Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.47% | 95% | Met |
| Response Rate | 100% | 90% | Met |
Training
A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 82 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 75 |
| Representatives of Education | 97 |
| Representatives of Employment | 192 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 134 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 121 |
| Representatives of Technology | 109 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 |
| TOTAL | 810 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 679 | 131 | 00 | 810 |
B. Training Topics
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 00 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 546 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 75 |
| Transition | 189 |
| Total | 810 |
C. Description of Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
A full-day training focused on Assistive Technology and Social Isolation was held on November 4, 2021. Service providers, residential reps, parents, and professionals benefited from this training. Engaging and interactive sessions included Adverse effects of social isolation, barriers to tech adoption, AT and innovations to combat social isolations, programs and resources, etc.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
A full-day training focused on Assistive Technology and Transitioning from High School was held on April 21, 2022. Educators, parents, students, and professionals benefited from this training. Engaging and interactive sessions included Transitioning into Adult Life, AT for Notetaking and Capturing Information, AT for Reading, Writing and Arithmetic and a panel discussion focused on preparing for college by students and university disability service reps.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A Web Accessibility for Developers webinar was held in May 2022 and provided participants with an overview of disability, accessibility guidelines, and ICT law. Participants learned techniques for designing, developing, and testing accessible websites including basic content, structure, images, forms, tables, CSS, and ARIA.
D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 15 |
| Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 45 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 15 |
| Total | 75 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | 80% |
| ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met |
E. Notes:
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 50% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 50% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
| Community Living | 00% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
INDATA provided technical assistance to the Indianapolis Library with regard to its digital inclusion roadmap. INDATA's involvement focused on improving access to library services and materials for persons of all abilities. Site visits, online questionnaires, and staff discussions regarding disability, assistive technology, and accessibility were conducted and recommendations were made for implementation of accessible public workstations at each branch (25).
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The INDATA Project produces 3 popular and widely distributed podcasts (ATUpdate, ATFAQ and Accessibility Minute). The focus of the podcasts is to share industry news, information on accessibility topics and to answer people's assistive technology questions. These podcasts have a highly engaged audience, and our listenership comes from over 160 countries.
2. The INDATA Project produces a weekly TechTip Youtube video that provides awareness of the various assistive technology devices available today. Each video provides information on what the device is, how it works and where it can be found. The INDATA YouTube channel has over 4000 subscribers and a library of over 600 videos.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 154 | 178 | 332 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 156 | 120 | 276 |
| Representative of Education | 29 | 21 | 50 |
| Representative of Employment | 11 | 00 | 11 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 59 | 63 | 122 |
| Representative of Community Living | 13 | 00 | 13 |
| Representative of Technology | 08 | 01 | 09 |
| Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 430 | 383 | 813 |
Referral Types:
Increased referrals were strengthened through concerted efforts to improve relationships with AAAs, the Division of Aging, and Independent Living Centers.
Referral Sources:
A partnership with the Division of Aging and AAAs to provide smart speakers and tablets to seniors who were experiencing social isolation led to improved relationships and a greater number of referrals. Also, technical assistance activities with the Indianapolis Public Library (25 branches) on digital literacy services and digital inclusion initiatives have led to an improved understanding of available services and more referrals.
Notes:
Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes
Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities
| Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
|---|
A. Coordination/Collaboration
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
INDATA collaborated with the Indiana Arts Commission to ensure better access for persons with disabilities to IAC's programs, grants, and services. A few activities included building accessibility language into grant applications, providing information on best practices for disability-related accommodations, input into a state-wide accessibility survey for Arts organizations, etc.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Participation on this committee led to a greater understanding of how accessibility and assistive technology can play a vital role in improving the participation of persons with disabilities in all areas of the Arts. The inclusion of accessibility language in grant applications has improved accessibility practices at Arts events and input on the development of a state-wide accessibility survey should increase awareness around best practices for accessibility and greater inclusion in the Arts.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Recreation / Leisure;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;
A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
INDATA collaborated with the Indianapolis Public Library to improve access to services and materials for persons of all abilities by implementing assistive technology workstations in each branch (25 total). Activities during this project included branch site visits, staff conversations, online surveys, disability and assistive technology training, etc.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Outcomes of this collaboration include staff being better able to meet patron needs (ex. low vision, mobility, learning differences, etc.) and patrons benefiting from increased access to services and materials. A simple, intuitive referral mechanism is also being developed to improve the coordination of referrals between the library and INDATA's demo and lending library. Also, patron accessibility guides are being developed to improve public awareness around helpful tools, features, and apps for mobile devices.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;
Overview of State Improvement Activities
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
Additional And Leveraged Funds
| Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
|---|
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
|---|
For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:30:00 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)