Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 05 | 01 | 06 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 05 | 01 | 06 |
Lowest Income: | $13,100 | Highest Income: | $71,400 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$239,172 | 06 | $39,862 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 01 | 01 | 01 | 01 | 02 | 00 | 06 |
Percentage of Loans | 16.67% | 16.67% | 16.67% | 16.67% | 33.33% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 06 | 100% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 06 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 06 | $64,720 |
Total | 06 | $64,720 |
Lowest | 4% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
26 | 06 | 4.33333333333333% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 03 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 03 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 06 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $2,840 |
Hearing | 02 | $3,557 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $2,639 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 03 | $55,684 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 07 | $64,720 |
Number Loans in default | 02 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $11,978 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 16 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 0 |
C. Total Served | 16 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 16 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 13 | $16,921 |
Hearing | 8 | $1,754 |
Speech communication | 0 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | $0 |
Daily living | 1 | $170 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 12 | $9,899 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | $0 |
Total | 34 | $28,744 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
One of our AT Loan borrowers shared the following message with us, "Thanks to the Bureau of Rehabilitation Services for providing the funding towards all the necessary vehicle modifications and the Connecticut Tech Act Project for providing a low interest loan for an extended period. I was able to purchase a 2022 Chevy Traverse that is fully accessible. I am able to drive the vehicle directly from my wheelchair to maintain my independence and commute to work. I also received grants from many generous organizations that made the purchase of the vehicle affordable. Those organizations include the Travis Roy Foundation, Connecticut Community Trust Foundation, Bryon Riesch Paralysis Foundation, Amy's Angels, Independence Northwest, Be Perfect Foundation, and the Triumph Foundation. Thank you to everyone that made this dream a reality." His statement shows the collaboration and team approach we try to always pursue in helping our AT Loan Borrowers obtain the items they need at the lowest costs.
Two sisters, who had received services from our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program, previously, returned to our program as their vision had declined and they had updates to their cochlear implants and now had Bluetooth capabilities. With the help of our AT Partner, United Cerebral Palsy of Eastern CT’s AT evaluator, we were able to provide additional equipment including MacBook Pros and iPhone 13 Pro Max to help with the changes in both their eyesight and new implants. The larger screens and the built-in accessibility features of the devices help to reduce eye strain and headaches. To say that both girls were grateful for the technology is an understatement. One of the sisters stated about the technology and training they received, “It has “It has changed our lives in a way I couldn’t imagine.”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 01 | 14 | 18 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 04 | 01 | 16 | 21 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 04 | 01 | 16 | 21 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
8. Total | 04 | 01 | 17 | 22 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 94.12% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 15 | 68.18% |
Satisfied | 05 | 22.73% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 4.55% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 4.55% |
Total Surveyed | 22 | |
Response rate % | 95.45% |
CT state AT Act program staff was able to assist applicants in obtaining an additional $60,159 in grants and other funding.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 512 |
C. Total | 512 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 512 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 03 | $4,175 | $750 | $3,425 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 406 | $268,795 | $38,316 | $230,479 |
Daily Living | 214 | $69,716 | $10,159 | $59,557 |
Environmental Adaptations | 12 | $4,307 | $95 | $4,212 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $1,000 | $0 | $1,000 |
Computers and Related | 05 | $1,738 | $1,738 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 08 | $9,865 | $2,070 | $7,795 |
Total | 649 | $359,596 | $53,128 | $306,468 |
A Veteran who heard about CT State AT Act partner agency the NEAT Center at Oak Hill, through the American Legion, had been visiting throughout the year. And built a connection with the Customer Service Representative. He was often in communication about available inventory. On one of his visits, he obtained a tri-point cane. He was so grateful that he is able to receive equipment to fit his needs free of charge due to a generous grant to help support Veterans access to DME. At first, he was apprehensive disclosing he was a Veteran because he "did not want to receive any special treatment". In return he wanted to pay it forward and help others who come into the DME Reuse Program and left a monetary donation.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 506 | 507 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 03 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 510 | 512 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 510 | 512 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 01 | 510 | 512 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 501 | 97.85% |
Satisfied | 10 | 1.95% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.2% |
Total Surveyed | 512 | |
Response rate % | 99.8% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 290 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 33 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 28 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 35 |
Total | 386 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 55 | 21 | 76 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 04 | 02 | 06 |
Representative of Education | 174 | 70 | 244 |
Representative of Employment | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 05 | 00 | 05 |
Representatives of Community Living | 51 | 02 | 53 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 290 | 96 | 386 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 06 | 01 | 07 |
Hearing | 06 | 03 | 09 |
Speech Communication | 347 | 91 | 438 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 86 | 19 | 105 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 12 | 01 | 13 |
Daily Living | 15 | 09 | 24 |
Environmental Adaptations | 16 | 14 | 30 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 221 | 55 | 276 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Total | 712 | 193 | 905 |
A consumer with developmental disabilities and low vision has struggled with reading all her life. She was making great strides to be more independent and had begun using the ADA transportation to get around her community and to employment. The Program Director for the state AT Act program was contacted to see if there were any devices that could help her at work to read independently. She was connected to an AT Partner, Meriden ATECH, where she borrowed an OrCam Read to take to work to for reading signs in the community. She was provided training to learn how to use it and she liked the the device. After the loan, she felt the device worked for her so well, she requested funding from the Dept. of Developmental Services (DDS) to help her obtain her own OrCam Read device. This was a nice collaboration between several state and community agencies that led to consumer success and maximized funding for DDS.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 150 | 08 | 89 | 247 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 28 | 01 | 00 | 29 |
Subtotal | 178 | 09 | 89 | 276 |
Have not made a decision | 05 | 00 | 02 | 07 |
Subtotal | 183 | 09 | 91 | 283 |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 01 | 01 | 07 |
Total | 188 | 10 | 92 | 290 |
Performance on this measure | 97.27% | 100% | 97.8% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 38 | 01 | 02 | 41 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 09 | 01 | 09 | 19 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 15 | 00 | 01 | 16 |
4. Subtotal | 62 | 02 | 12 | 76 |
5. None of the above | 09 | 00 | 00 | 09 |
6. Subtotal | 71 | 02 | 12 | 85 |
7. Nonrespondent | 11 | 00 | 00 | 11 |
8. Total | 82 | 02 | 12 | 96 |
9. Performance on this measure | 87.32% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 319 | 82.64% |
Satisfied | 47 | 12.18% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.52% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 18 | 4.66% |
Total Surveyed | 386 | |
Response rate % | 95.34% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 15 |
Hearing | 02 |
Speech Communication | 125 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 124 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 02 |
Daily Living | 31 |
Environmental Adaptations | 20 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 63 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 05 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 387 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 128 | 152 | 280 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 13 | 147 | 160 |
Representatives of Education | 209 | 513 | 722 |
Representatives of Employment | 11 | 152 | 163 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 06 | 26 | 32 |
Representative of Community Living | 20 | 72 | 92 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Total | 387 | 1,064 | 1,451 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 09 |
Service Provider | 25 |
Vendor | 594 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 08 |
Total | 636 |
CT State AT Act partner agency, EASTCONN, worked with a student who has a learning disability with encoding challenges. Student was provided a demonstration of a Google extension called "Co:Writer Universal." In addition, a 'topic dictionary' was created in the extension which provided the words on the subject he was writing about in the word prediction window based on his phonemic spelling. After the demonstration, the student used the extension with an authentic writing assignment. He was able to write full sentences to answer questions with the words spelled correctly. After writing the sentences they were read aloud to him, and he was able to edit the sentences independently. When the student completed his assignment, he stated "My science teacher is going to be amazed at my full sentences and correct spelling!" The student stated that this tool will “definitely be helpful” for him when he is writing.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 249 | 24 | 94 | 367 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 02 | 00 | 12 |
Subtotal | 259 | 26 | 94 | 379 |
Have not made a decision | 07 | 00 | 01 | 08 |
Subtotal | 266 | 26 | 95 | 387 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 266 | 26 | 95 | 387 |
Performance on this measure | 97.37% | 100% | 98.95% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,226 | 84.49% |
Satisfied | 217 | 14.96% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.28% |
Not at all satisfied | 03 | 0.21% |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 0.07% |
Total | 1,451 | |
Response rate % | 99.93% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 42 | 02 | 522 | 566 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 09 | 02 | 14 | 25 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 16 | 00 | 02 | 18 |
4. Subtotal | 67 | 04 | 538 | 609 |
5. None of the above | 09 | 00 | 00 | 09 |
6. Subtotal | 76 | 04 | 538 | 618 |
7. Nonrespondent | 11 | 00 | 01 | 12 |
8. Total | 87 | 04 | 539 | 630 |
9. Performance on this measure | 67.11% | 100% | 99.44% | 95.48% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 399 | 32 | 183 | 614 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 38 | 03 | 00 | 41 |
Subtotal | 437 | 35 | 183 | 655 |
Have not made a decision | 12 | 00 | 03 | 15 |
Subtotal | 449 | 35 | 186 | 670 |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 01 | 01 | 07 |
Total | 454 | 36 | 187 | 677 |
Performance on this measure | 97.33% | 100% | 98.39% | 97.76% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.57% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.11% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 170 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 125 |
Representatives of Education | 1,354 |
Representatives of Employment | 89 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 207 |
Representatives of Community Living | 211 |
Representatives of Technology | 103 |
Unable to Categorize | 58 |
TOTAL | 2,317 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
2,109 | 204 | 04 | 2,317 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,595 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 58 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 611 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 25 |
Transition | 28 |
Total | 2,317 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
State AT Act partner agency, the NEAT Center, offered a webinar to 13 participants that included representatives of technology, allied health and education. Many clinicians turned to Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC) emulators or other mirroring software when services quickly shifted from in person to the virtual formats. As in person services working with students or adults resumed, AAC emulators continued to be very useful. They can be used to make changes to a device, create visuals, and provide staff training. Thankfully, many emulators are free! Participants learned which AAC emulators are available on Windows versus macOS devices, where to download the software, and the basics of how to use them. Software and apps that were reviewed and trained on included TD Snap, NuVoice (CoreScanner), Empower (Unity and LAMP WFL), Chat Editor (TouchChat), and Proloquo2Go
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
State AT Act partner agency, EASTCONN, provided training to the entire 6th grade team of educators in a public school on Read & Write for Google, to utilize with one targeted student (based on the results of the student's Assistive Technology evaluation). The positive impact of this training was that not only would the one individual student benefit from the educators learning how to use the software and provide any needed supports, but any 6th grade student who might benefit from the Google Chrome extension to assist with increasing independence with reading, writing, and organization will benefit from the knowledge the educators received by participating in this training. Additionally, the participants of this training can share what they've learned with their peer educators to support students in other grades as well, creating a wide ranging impact for students in that school district.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
State AT Act partner agency, the NEAT Center, offered a 2-part series of live webinars on "How to create accessible documents and PDFs" to 16 participants from various backgrounds including individuals with disabilities, allied health, representatives of education, community living, technology and employment. Attendees were eager to build their digital accessibility skills. Some unique feedback from the survey question "What did you like about this training?" included: - It made me more aware of accessibility needs and that the tasks needed to be done to make things accessible are complex. - It was incredibly thorough. Steve does a fantastic job of going through the process step by step. Everyone should be required to take an accessibility training from him! - Very tangible skills that are relevant to my job responsibilities. Taught by an individual with lived experience. Experience the actual tools during training. - Obtained new skill on how to create documents to the organization's constituents, as well as assist my son with skills that he will be able to utilize in the education and workplace setting. - Gave me exactly what I wanted to learn!
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 18 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 03 |
No known outcome at this time | 04 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 25 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 84% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 05% |
---|---|
Employment | 60% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 05% |
Community Living | 15% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 15% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
CT state Assistive Technology Act program has been providing guidance and technical assistance to the CT state Library system and the CT state Library & Partners Digital Equity Initiative by participating in monthly meetings and presenting at said meetings on how the CT AT Act Program programs and services can benefit libraries and their patrons. Emphasis placed on upcoming Digital Divide Coordinators who can assist in training library staff on how best to support their patrons who are aging or have disabilities. Part of this TA includes providing input on the 5 year state plan on Digital Equity. This high impact TA has the ability to impact libraries throughout the state, to help increase knowledge and skills of library staff and reach library patrons directly who may not otherwise be aware of the AT Act program.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
CT state Assistive Technology Act program has been actively involved in provide technical assistance to the CT state unit on aging as they pursue and purchase a virtual senior center platform to allow aging individuals wo receive senior services via virtual programming and through technology. The AT Act Program Director played a direct role in raising awareness of the accessibility needs of such a platform, reviewing and testing platforms and participating in demonstrations of platforms with the focus of accessibility to users with disabilities and who may be using adaptive software, apps or hardware.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Two CT state Assistive Technology Act partners, EASTCONN and CREC, oversee an Assistive Technology & Transition Community of Practice. The quarterly 3 hour meetings have been held virtually with participants that include Assistive Technology professionals, educators, representatives of the state Department of Education, and other specialists such as Speech and Language Professionals, Occupational and Physical therapists, special educators and others who are interested in the topics. Topics covered range from general Assistive Technology (AT) in the classroom, AT devices for specific disabilities and barriers, Augmentative Alternative Communication (AAC), AT for vocational settings, and to enhance student independence. Over 30 individuals participate in each quarterly session which are extremely interactive and include real student scenarios.
2. CT state Assistive Technology Act partner ATECH held an in person conference on July 18, 2022 "Navigating the Journey to Independence" that focused on how to increase independence for individuals with disabilities in CT through Assistive Technology. Several other AT Act partners presented individual sessions throughout the day on Smart Home technology, Assistive Technology for employment, ADA and reasonable accommodations, along with specifically helping individuals with development disabilities and those entities who serve them rethink services through remote monitoring technologies and other AT solutions. AT Act Program Director hosted a session on smartphone and tablet apps as AT. The conference had approximately 200 attendees and about 15 exhibitors.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 256 | 37 | 293 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 177 | 28 | 205 |
Representative of Education | 169 | 05 | 174 |
Representative of Employment | 114 | 00 | 114 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 55 | 04 | 59 |
Representative of Community Living | 2,418 | 25 | 2,443 |
Representative of Technology | 171 | 00 | 171 |
Unable to Categorize | 957 | 01 | 958 |
Total | 4,317 | 100 | 4,417 |
Due to the downturn in numbers of individuals applying for AT Loans our Processing Technician has begun to schedule Outreach Activities on a regular basis to generate interest in our programs and services. We expect this strategy to result in greater number of applications for alternative financing but also for other AT Act services. Additionally, AT Act Program Director has resumed in person Public Awareness Activities to generate awareness and increase the number of individuals and entities reaching out to us. One unique strategy are we’ve implemented is working closely with the CT State Library System, along with collaborating closely with our State Unit on Aging and Ombudsman’s office and the Centers for Independent Living.
Because of the relationship between the state AT Act program and our Vocational Rehabilitation agency, referrals for AT services have been historically from employment related agencies (82 out of 4411). However, as a result of previous grant establishment short term programs, such as the Reeves Foundation Grant we have seen a slight increase in referrals from health care facilities (26), as the state AT Act program partnered with 2 hospitals in CT. Additionally, due to our collaboration, through CARES Act funding, with our State Unit on Aging, the Centers for Independent Living and Area Agencies on Aging, we have seen an increase in referrals from community service and other disability agencies (219). Our community AT Partners each have their own niche for receiving referrals, many are primarily from educators and schools (148) as well as other state agencies. However, it seems the primary way individuals and entities learn of AT Act services is via our website and other entity website
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The CT state Assistive Technology Act program has been actively collaborating with the state Department of Developmental Services (DDS) on their Assistive Technology initiatives to serve and support their consumers with intellectual disabilities. This is completely funded by DDS with the AT Act Program Director's input, guidance and Technical Assistance.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
This is an ongoing collaboration with the AT Act Program Director working closely with DDS Assistive Technology point person to review initiatives, brainstorm and plan out how we can better work together for the betterment of DDS consumers and residents of our state. As a result of our collaborations, DDS is implementing several initiatives including the AT and Me program which will provide 200 backpacks of AT equipment and mainstream technology to DDS consumers who will be trained on how to use the equipment and then they will be required to train 2 other individuals, who will also receive backpacks of equipment.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Technical Assistance;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The CT state Assistive Technology Act Program Director has been actively collaborating with the CT state Library Systems to help impact their Digital Equity initiatives and programming. As part of this collaboration, the AT Act Program Director is participating in monthly planning meetings, has presented on how our programs and services can benefit the state libraries and their patrons. Activities thus far have included presentations and participation in the first Digital Equity Week kick off conference as well as monthly meetings with state library system and multiple local libraries. No AT Act funding has been used for this TA. Program Director has provided guidance and Technical Assistance.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Awareness of AT Act services and programs has been increased. Ground work has been laid for future direct partnerships and mutual programming. Local libraries have begun to reach out to the AT Act Program and our partner agencies for additional public awareness activities at their local libraries to reach their staff and patrons.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Training; Technical Assistance;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $54,465 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $11,833 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $26,489 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $35,500 | Demonstration | True |
Federal | $52,975 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $54,464 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $108,929 | Demonstration | True |
Federal | $35,317 | Training | True |
Federal | $10,000 | Reuse | True |
Federal | $26,487 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Federal | $117,156 | State Financing | True |
Federal | $35,317 | Demonstration | True |
Amount: $568,932 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:27:58 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)