Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 25 | 07 | 32 |
Approved Not made | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 28 | 08 | 36 |
Lowest Income: | $20,748 | Highest Income: | $39,228 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$674,263 | 32 | $21,071 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 09 | 14 | 05 | 04 | 00 | 00 | 32 |
Percentage of Loans | 28.12% | 43.75% | 15.62% | 12.5% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 32 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 32 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 32 | $195,137 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 32 | $195,137 |
Lowest | 0% |
---|---|
Highest | 8% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
72 | 32 | 2.25% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 22 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 03 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 07 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 32 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 02 | $3,800 |
Speech communication | 01 | $350 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 02 | $2,723 |
Daily living | 07 | $35,443 |
Environmental adaptations | 09 | $22,010 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 10 | $128,331 |
Computers and related | 01 | $2,480 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 32 | $195,137 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
Iowa Able Foundation / Able Up Iowa continues a partnership with the Habitat for Humanity affiliate that serves Black Hawk County. This partnership has resulted in two borrowers working with the affiliate for home modifications. This partnership benefits the homeowner, borrower and the two organizations to help Iowans live independently in their homes.
A borrower was referred to Able Up Iowa by a partnering organization and approved a loan for a ramp. The borrower called us to share when the ramp was installed and was so excited about being able to take his wheelchair out of his home so he could get around more. He was also very grateful and called at least four times to talk with the loan officer (while she was out on medical leave) so he could thank her personally.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 28 | 28 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 32 | 32 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 32 | 32 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 32 | 32 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 09 | 28.13% |
Satisfied | 10 | 31.25% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 13 | 40.63% |
Total Surveyed | 32 | |
Response rate % | 59.38% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 01 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 762 |
C. Total | 763 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 763 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 | $2,310 | $0 | $2,310 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 01 | $2,310 | $0 | $2,310 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 33 | $29,642 | $875 | $28,767 |
Hearing | 06 | $891 | $0 | $891 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 | $1,197 | $0 | $1,197 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 174 | $239,485 | $9,110 | $230,375 |
Daily Living | 376 | $165,928 | $7,100 | $158,828 |
Environmental Adaptations | 163 | $43,389 | $3,800 | $39,589 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 06 | $66 | $0 | $66 |
Computers and Related | 77 | $14,763 | $0 | $14,763 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 | $1,502 | $0 | $1,502 |
Total | 862 | $496,863 | $20,885 | $475,978 |
A Licenced Rehabilitation Practitioner contacted the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program Durable Medical Equipment Loan seeking a RAZ shower chair for a consumer, Murray, who would be released from an in-patient facility within a couple of days. A RAZ shower chair is not a style of chair that is donated very often, luckily one was donated and available for loan at the time of this request. This style of shower chair can range in cost from $1500 to $2000, brand new. The one-time fee from Easterseals is $50.00 to use, saving this individual $1450.00 or more. The practitioner provided the following quote, "this program is a valuable resource for durable medical equipment is a cost saving service for individuals living in Iowa."
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 501 | 501 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 40 | 178 | 218 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 19 | 25 | 44 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 59 | 704 | 763 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 59 | 704 | 763 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 59 | 704 | 763 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 473 | 61.99% |
Satisfied | 274 | 35.91% |
Satisfied somewhat | 16 | 2.1% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 763 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 110 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 00 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 14 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 16 |
Total | 140 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 34 | 00 | 34 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 12 | 00 | 12 |
Representative of Education | 16 | 00 | 16 |
Representative of Employment | 24 | 16 | 40 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 10 | 14 | 24 |
Representatives of Community Living | 13 | 00 | 13 |
Representatives of Technology | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 110 | 30 | 140 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 31 | 00 | 31 |
Hearing | 21 | 00 | 21 |
Speech Communication | 12 | 00 | 12 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 40 | 18 | 58 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 | 00 | 06 |
Daily Living | 76 | 28 | 104 |
Environmental Adaptations | 08 | 00 | 08 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 08 | 00 | 08 |
Computers and Related | 89 | 00 | 89 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 29 | 00 | 29 |
Total | 320 | 46 | 366 |
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program began a Lending Library pilot project with the Easterseals Iowa Brain Health Program. Brain Health supports the mental health and wellbeing of individuals in central Iowa through Crisis Stabilization, counseling, and wrap-around supports. The Brain Health team identified devices that would support clients during their counseling sessions including B-Calm Audio Sedation system, fidgets, weighted lap pad, and Vibes ear plugs. These devices are loaned to the counselors and utilized with the clients during counseling sessions. The counselors reported high satisfaction among clients and satisfaction in regard to the ease of access to the devices. A protocol for sanitation in between loans as well as a reporting structure was also a piece of this pilot project.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 10 | 11 | 39 | 60 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 09 | 05 | 24 | 38 |
Subtotal | 19 | 16 | 63 | 98 |
Have not made a decision | 02 | 01 | 07 | 10 |
Subtotal | 21 | 17 | 70 | 108 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 21 | 18 | 71 | 110 |
Performance on this measure | 90.48% | 94.12% | 90% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 07 | 14 | 25 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 07 | 15 | 27 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 07 | 15 | 27 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
8. Total | 05 | 08 | 17 | 30 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 91 | 65% |
Satisfied | 33 | 23.57% |
Satisfied somewhat | 14 | 10% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 1.43% |
Total Surveyed | 140 | |
Response rate % | 98.57% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 05 |
Hearing | 01 |
Speech Communication | 05 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 06 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 03 |
Daily Living | 43 |
Environmental Adaptations | 09 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 60 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 135 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 92 | 00 | 92 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 20 | 10 | 30 |
Representatives of Education | 07 | 02 | 09 |
Representatives of Employment | 03 | 05 | 08 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 11 | 04 | 15 |
Representative of Community Living | 01 | 15 | 16 |
Representative of Technology | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Total | 135 | 38 | 173 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 12 |
Service Provider | 05 |
Vendor | 35 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 02 |
Total | 54 |
Megan experiences high levels of anxiety and found this impedes her ability to remain organized at her university, as a freshman. Her father contacted the Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program on her behalf and scheduled an onsite demonstration. During this demonstration, Megan shared that she tends to misplace paper and notes very frequently and has attempted to keep notes in her phone which has proven successful but limited. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff demonstrated an iPad and note-taking apps which Megan was very excited as these notes could be shared between her phone and computer as well as an iPad. Megan purchased an iPad independently and reported continued success into the fall semester.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 07 | 04 | 110 | 121 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 09 | 00 | 10 |
Subtotal | 08 | 13 | 110 | 131 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 01 | 02 | 04 |
Subtotal | 09 | 14 | 112 | 135 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 09 | 14 | 112 | 135 |
Performance on this measure | 88.89% | 92.86% | 98.21% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 99 | 57.23% |
Satisfied | 65 | 37.57% |
Satisfied somewhat | 09 | 5.2% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 173 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 07 | 543 | 554 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 40 | 178 | 219 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 19 | 30 | 49 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 66 | 751 | 822 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 66 | 751 | 822 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
8. Total | 05 | 67 | 753 | 825 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 71.21% | 96.01% | 94.04% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 17 | 15 | 149 | 181 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 10 | 14 | 24 | 48 |
Subtotal | 27 | 29 | 173 | 229 |
Have not made a decision | 03 | 02 | 09 | 14 |
Subtotal | 30 | 31 | 182 | 243 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 30 | 32 | 183 | 245 |
Performance on this measure | 90% | 93.55% | 95.05% | 94.24% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 96.43% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 98.65% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 196 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 40 |
Representatives of Education | 64 |
Representatives of Employment | 161 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 430 |
Representatives of Community Living | 235 |
Representatives of Technology | 04 |
Unable to Categorize | 663 |
TOTAL | 1,793 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,445 | 348 | 00 | 1,793 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,699 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 91 |
Transition | 03 |
Total | 1,793 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff planned,coordinated, and hosted their first annual Assistive Technology Maker Workshop. This event brought Therese Willkomm as a guest lecturer. Attendees ranged from across the state of Iowa, in person, and from various countries, virtually. This event was a two-day workshop that purposed to speak on the benefits of low-tech AT and covered aids of daily living, employment, education, and sensory engagement. Over 50 attendees were present, virtually and in-person, and each attendee was able to create hands-on AT in minutes devices, virtual attendee kits were shipped in advance.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program team members provided training and support to the On Trac Health Project led by the University of Iowa Center for Disabilities and Development. Presentations, consultation, and engagement were provided to revise the Direct Support Professional and Assistive Technology portions of the previously developed curriculum from Oregon. Additional assistance was provided for accessible formatting.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff supported the inclusivity of a Sensory Friendly Event developed and presented by the Des Moines Performing Arts Center. Staff reviewed materials, provided detailed feedback, and supported education on the implementation process.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 11 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 70 |
No known outcome at this time | 10 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 91 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 89% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 21% |
---|---|
Employment | 00% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 07% |
Community Living | 72% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program presented on the Assistive Technology Center services and activities in a 4-part, national CEU-approved training in collaboration with CHP Community, NCHPAD, and Iowa Department of Public Health on the inclusion of people with disabilities in evidence-based practices for health and wellness, diabetes-prevention programming. Funding was provided from collaborators for the ESI ATP to purchase a wheelchair accessible scale to be housed in the AT Center and used for persons statewide in weight management. This opportunity is part of a continuum of coordination to enhance access of assistive technologies to better address the health and wellness disparity among individuals with disabilities, by the Iowa Department of Public Health.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff are working alongside other programs at Easterseals to coordinate with the Department of Human Services. This collaboration will support individuals with disabilities as they transition from Woodward Resource Center (a state-operated institution) as a result of the Department of Justice report, citing complaints and non-compliance with the Olmstead Act and ADA. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff met with the leadership team at Woodward to explore how Assistive Technology could be of assistance to the residents, including the 140 residents that are transitioning to Woodward from Glenwood Resource Center, after its closure.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff attended the Latino Resource Fair of Central Iowa in the summer of 2022. The Latino Resource Fair included community organizations, both disability and non-disability related, cultural meals, children's activities, a Covid-19 Vaccination Clinic, and bilingual tours of the Iowa State Capitol. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff arranged for an interpreter to be present to ensure communication and engagement with all attendees.
2. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff attended the Make Your Mark Conference as a vendor. This conference is designed for Iowans with disabilities who desire to enhance their advocacy skills at the local, state, and/or federal levels. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff purposed to host a table with various devices that could purpose to aid in self-advocacy as well as independence with various activities of daily living.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 535 | 118 | 653 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 451 | 99 | 550 |
Representative of Education | 47 | 09 | 56 |
Representative of Employment | 10 | 23 | 33 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 181 | 30 | 211 |
Representative of Community Living | 145 | 26 | 171 |
Representative of Technology | 10 | 02 | 12 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 1,380 | 308 | 1,688 |
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program piloted a demonstration kit project with an Area Agency on Aging in FY 21. With many positive results, this collaboration will expand to additional AAA across the state of Iowa with the goal of increasing the AAA referral type from its baseline of 2.86%.
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program works closely with the Rural Solutions Program which has long been proven to be a 'word-of-mouth' referral program. With the data obtained by tracking the percentage of referral sources, it is apparent that past customers are the highest referral source (32.86%). External entities such as website visitors (17.14%), AAA (2.86%), and other disability and website visitors (7.14%) being much lower. Our outreach efforts will focus on creating a sustainable relationship with organizations to ensure that referrals are more clearly directed to Assistive Technology Program due to staff having greater knowledge and awareness of the services and impact of the AT Program. The final category of referral type was unknown (22.86%), the ESI ATP will enhance staff knowledge of the proper processes to lower this number by inquiring and documenting more precise referral information.
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Center's successful pilot project of demonstration kits with Elderbridge Area Agency on Aging provided motivation for project implementation to all six Area Agencies on Aging across the state of Iowa. Each Area Agency on Aging has, in their possession, a kit of 25 types of Assistive Technology that staff is trained by Easterseals Iowa team members on demonstrating and trialing with their consumers, as well as sanitation of the devices.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Access to Assistive Technology is now in the hands of more direct support professionals across the state of Iowa. These DSPs have a long-standing relationship with the consumers and are now equipped to provide demonstration and support implementation of AT in the consumer's environment. Easterseals Iowa continues to communicate with each AAA, including reminders for data submission and continued satisfaction assessment with consumers, and training for AAA staff. This initiative does not have an end date and the current plan is to assess on an annual basis and determine if devices, within each kit, require replacement or if the kits require enhancement of additional devices.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Community Participation and Integration; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program has enhanced its coordination and collaboration with state Area Educational Agencies. A prior existing relationship with Great Prairie AEA continued into its second year of device loan, as this AEA maintains a kit of devices that they demonstrate to students throughout the year. Relationships with AEAs were enhanced as Easterseals Iowa ATP implemented a pilot project with Heartland AEA with two Permobil Explorer Minis that will be maintained by the AEA Physical Therapists.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program worked to implement the two Permobil Explorer Minis into Heartland AEA by purchasing the devices and coordinating their delivery. These devices will remain the property of Easterseals ATP but will reside at Heartland AEA. Heartland AEA staff developed a protocol for loaning these devices including instructional handouts, sanitation process, delivery and pick-up process, and staff education. Permobil Explorer Minis were implemented in February of 2022 and resulted in two demonstrations during the 2022 school year. High satisfaction has been a result for the end-users, families, staff at the AEA, and staff at Eastersals Iowa.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Recreation / Leisure; Transition(school to work or congregate care to community);
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Demonstration;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program established a committee of key stakeholders regarding AAC. Per the committee's feedback, an online survey, an in-person survey, and a focus group were conducted with persons that use AAC, their family and guardians, and professionals related to AAC. At this time, there has not been a specific policy change but this committee has developed and approved an action plan which will be shared with the director of Iowa Medicaid Enterprise in 2023.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Key factors identified through this process included the lack of funding for AAC, lack of awareness for AAC, and limited opportunities for recreation and social engagement for those that utilize AAC.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Community Living
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff participated in Iowa Medicaid Listening sessions and followed up with IME Director for an onsite tour. Discussion on gaps in funding for DME as well as exploration of more robust collaborative effort.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program staff and Iowa Medicaid Enterprise, in conjunction with managed care organizations developed strategies for a statewide committee to explore the durable medical equipment needs of Iowans. Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program implemented a change to Reutilization applications which included gathering data on the number of consumers served that currently are eligible for Medicaid services. Finally, Easterseals Iowa Assistive Technology Program began collaborative efforts with other tech act programs, including Oklahoma AT program, to brainstorm and bring information to the Iowa Medicaid Enterprise for replication of appropriate projects.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Community Living
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Federal | $15,000 | Reuse | True |
Federal | $100,000 | Reuse | True |
Amount: $115,000 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:30:16 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)