Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 06 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 52 |
C. Total | 58 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 58 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 06 | $250 | $0 | $250 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 06 | $250 | $0 | $250 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 05 | $277 | $0 | $277 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 25 | $5,267 | $0 | $5,267 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 02 | $341 | $0 | $341 |
Daily Living | 04 | $2,396 | $0 | $2,396 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 16 | $34,408 | $0 | $34,408 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 52 | $42,689 | $0 | $42,689 |
Developmental Disability Resource Center became an evaluation entity for Early Intervention in the state of Colorado in early 2022. In an effort to expand their evaluation sites and access to appropriate equipment and seating for those evaluation rooms, they acquired a long term loan of a Chairries seat from CIDE. They plan to use this sturdy, toddler-sized chair in combination with a small table for play-based assessments and anticipate that it will get a lot of use and be used by 4-5 children per day and make a big difference in their ability to evaluate children.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 52 | 00 | 00 | 52 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 52 | 00 | 06 | 58 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 52 | 00 | 06 | 58 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 52 | 00 | 06 | 58 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 55 | 94.83% |
Satisfied | 03 | 5.17% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 58 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
We posted our newly developed AT Exchange site late summer so we only have 3 months of data.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 1,049 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 40 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 198 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 39 |
Total | 1,326 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 29 | 08 | 37 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 44 | 05 | 49 |
Representative of Education | 972 | 97 | 1,069 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 127 | 127 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 04 | 13 | 17 |
Representatives of Community Living | 00 | 19 | 19 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 08 | 08 |
Total | 1,049 | 277 | 1,326 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 42 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 18 | 05 | 23 |
Hearing | 14 | 03 | 17 |
Speech Communication | 386 | 126 | 512 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 477 | 120 | 597 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 46 | 19 | 65 |
Daily Living | 61 | 17 | 78 |
Environmental Adaptations | 21 | 08 | 29 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 25 | 06 | 31 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | 11 | 12 |
Total | 1,049 | 315 | 1,364 |
Graham is a 24 year old young man with severe autism and profound speech and language disorders with very limited means of communication with the people around him causing frustration and frequent and frightening self-injurious behaviors. A caged hockey helmet, arm protection and mitts kept Graham safe from hurting himself. Working with one of our speech language pathologist, Graham was able to borrow a Touch Chat communication device and trial it at home. His family and caregivers learned how to use the device and work with him on a daily basis in a natural setting. Graham was able to learn how to use the device without prompting and revealed his ability to use a dynamic display, locate preferred foods, drinks, people and activities, and comment on his emotions. Because of the loan of the Touch Chat device, and the ability to trial the device to ensure it was the best solution before purchase, Graham’s parents are now better able to enjoy him and he no longer depends on his hockey helmet to keep himself safe as he is able to communicate his wants and needs to those around him.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 235 | 00 | 22 | 257 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 579 | 00 | 28 | 607 |
Subtotal | 814 | 00 | 50 | 864 |
Have not made a decision | 185 | 00 | 00 | 185 |
Subtotal | 999 | 00 | 50 | 1,049 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 999 | 00 | 50 | 1,049 |
Performance on this measure | 81.48% | NaN% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 224 | 00 | 04 | 228 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 25 | 00 | 16 | 41 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 06 | 01 | 08 |
4. Subtotal | 250 | 06 | 21 | 277 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 250 | 06 | 21 | 277 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 250 | 06 | 21 | 277 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,029 | 77.6% |
Satisfied | 281 | 21.19% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 16 | 1.21% |
Total Surveyed | 1,326 | |
Response rate % | 98.79% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 03 |
Hearing | 18 |
Speech Communication | 77 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 03 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 182 |
Daily Living | 01 |
Environmental Adaptations | 03 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 18 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total # of Device Demonstrations | 307 |
Type of Participant | Decision-Makers | Other Participants | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 201 | 106 | 307 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 101 | 55 | 156 |
Representatives of Education | 02 | 15 | 17 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 03 | 29 | 32 |
Representative of Community Living | 00 | 10 | 10 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 307 | 216 | 523 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 79 |
Service Provider | 85 |
Vendor | 91 |
Repair Service | 73 |
Others | 02 |
Total | 330 |
F. K. is a 3 year old with Cerebral Palsy born at 25 weeks with Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and suffered from multiple brain bleeds. He could not explore his environment in an upright position. Now that his brain bleeds have stabilized, and his vision is improving, he is making progress with his motor skills. He is a curious child who is very motivated to explore his environment and loves moving around. He was given a device demonstration of The Gait Trainer. His family was so excited to try this device as it allowed him to stand on his own and gave him a new found independence and a new view of the world. After the trial, he was able to order his own Gait Trainer and they are now anxiously awaiting it's arrival.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 20 | 19 | 191 | 230 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 03 | 03 | 71 | 77 |
Subtotal | 23 | 22 | 262 | 307 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 23 | 22 | 262 | 307 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 23 | 22 | 262 | 307 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 460 | 87.95% |
Satisfied | 63 | 12.05% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 523 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 224 | 00 | 10 | 234 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 77 | 00 | 16 | 93 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 06 | 01 | 08 |
4. Subtotal | 302 | 06 | 27 | 335 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 302 | 06 | 27 | 335 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 302 | 06 | 27 | 335 |
9. Performance on this measure | 99.67% | 0% | 96.3% | 97.61% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 255 | 19 | 213 | 487 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 582 | 03 | 99 | 684 |
Subtotal | 837 | 22 | 312 | 1,171 |
Have not made a decision | 185 | 00 | 00 | 185 |
Subtotal | 1,022 | 22 | 312 | 1,356 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 1,022 | 22 | 312 | 1,356 |
Performance on this measure | 81.9% | 100% | 100% | 86.36% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 100% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.16% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 60 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 57 |
Representatives of Education | 1,804 |
Representatives of Employment | 95 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 361 |
Representatives of Community Living | 1,075 |
Representatives of Technology | 143 |
Unable to Categorize | 20 |
TOTAL | 3,615 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
3,181 | 434 | 00 | 3,615 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 2,301 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 1,140 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 34 |
Transition | 140 |
Total | 3,615 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
Clinicians from the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado were invited to speak at the Special Care Clinic Educational Series meeting which serves as an educational event for the many physicians and clinicians within the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus System. The presentation provided an overview of the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado and the Center for Inclusion and Design and Engineering (CIDE). The presentation provided information about assistive technology, device demonstrations, device loans, the AT exchange and AT Funding programs. The presentation was attended by over 100 clinical staff including residents, from the different hospitals on campus and was recorded and placed on their internal educational drive for those who could not attend. Resources and links were offered as well as an update on available assistive technology. Following the presentation, numerous inquiries for our services were received in the following weeks.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Transition Leadership Institute - "Help! My student is a 12th grander and can't read! - Technology to access grade level and career text!" - Print disabilities are not quite the barrier they used to be, even just a few years ago. Advances in hardware and more importantly machine learning and artificial intelligence have leveled the playing field considerably. CIDE staff provided an interactive demonstration of the options available for reading printed and electronic text. The session was designed for individuals who work with students with print disabilities, especially those transitioning to employment settings; those who wanted to learn more about the assistive technologies built into the devices they already own; and those who had a keen interest in new technologies and how they may be implemented to support individuals with disabilities. Attendees walked away with a toolbox of options to support reading in the classroom and beyond.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
After providing an accessibility audit of Jefferson County Public Health Departments COVID-19 webpages, training was provided to the web content team and web development team to improve access by creating accessible PDF documents and marketing materials that were hosted on the domain. We continue to receive requests and provide technical assistance to the web content team members.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 34 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 34 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
We started using a new tracking system with monthly reminders for staff to complete, so our numbers have increased along with providing additional trainings.
Education | 40% |
---|---|
Employment | 10% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 00% |
Community Living | 50% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 00% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
MarkIT Mobile Voting User Testing and Accessibility Review. CIDE was engaged to analyze the mobile voting app and create a user test plan, pilot the test plan with typical users, and conduct usability & assistive technology testing. Testing occured on three cohorts including individuals with cognitive disabilities, physical disabilities, and older adults. The assistive technology testing resulted in the firing of the original app development team due to the number of issues the developers couldn't fix and the hiring of a new team.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
One of the Colorado Community Centered Boards (CCB) approached our Tech for Tykes program and asked us to join one of their team meetings to discuss transition to Part B services. Several members of their team had questions about the transition process for AT as children age out of the Part C services. We joined their team meeting and presented to providers, service coordinators, and CCB managers on the process of what happens with AT during the transition process depending on the funding source and how to document the features of the AT that the child is benefiting from without naming a specific device in the transition report.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. NRRTS (National Registry of Rehabilitation Technology Suppliers) Directions article highlights the increasing need for wheeled mobility for those affected by Ehler’s Danlos Syndrome, a hypermobility disorder that has been on the rise in the recent years, especially during the COVID pandemic. The article discusses a case study of a young woman who was evaluated and assessed at our clinic for a manual wheelchair with a power assist device. Her equipment was successfully funded and she has been able to use her new mobility device with great success resulting in increased independence with mobility-related activities of daily living, energy conservation, improvement in function, strength, endurance and overall quality of life. The article was shared through a therapy trade magazine reaching approximately 10,000 industry professionals in all 50 states, Canada and Puerto Rico. This article has resulted in identifying CIDE as a leader in providing successful assistive technology solutions for individuals with Ehler’s Danlos Syndrome and increased our overall referrals to our clinic.
2. The Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering proudly hosted the 2022 Conference for Assistive Technology and Education (CATE). This 2-day, virtual conference event registered 237 participants from 30 different states and 4 countries. The schedule featured 2 workshops and 20 breakout sessions presented by nationally recognized leaders in the field including Therese Willkomm, Janet Sturm, Kelly Fonner, Donna McNear, Chris Bugaj, Beth Poss, Mo Buti, and Sarah Gregory, among others. The virtual platform supported over 3,000 messages between participants, 23 post-event Meet-Ups, 87 Discussion Topics, and 94 Community Board Posts. In a post-event survey, 94% of respondents indicated their participation would positively impact the achievement of individuals with disabilities.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 14,560 | 3,120 | 17,680 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 9,360 | 4,420 | 13,780 |
Representative of Education | 16,900 | 3,640 | 20,540 |
Representative of Employment | 2,340 | 520 | 2,860 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 10,400 | 1,820 | 12,220 |
Representative of Community Living | 6,240 | 2,340 | 8,580 |
Representative of Technology | 260 | 00 | 260 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 60,060 | 15,860 | 75,920 |
Continued collaborations with our community partners provides for the majority of our referrals. As we continue to expand our services and train new providers our numbers continue to grow. Also, through our multiple advisory groups, we learn of barriers to services and acquisition of equipment and become a resource for those in need. Our early intervention providers and pre-school/day care programs referrals have increased through our Preschool Development Grant and Project Include programs.
Our state-wide community partners and collaborators continue to be our primary source of referrals. We work with 19 Community Centered Boards(10% of referrals) with 63 AT Consultants in our Tech for Tykes program; 72 school districts (25% of referrals) with 102 team coordinators and 409 SWAAAC members in our school AT program; Colorado Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, Deaf/Blind Denver metro area (2% of the referrals); Division of Vocational Rehabilitation 5 metro offices (10% of referrals); 128 Medical Professionals (50% of referrals) and 4 Equipment Vendors (3% of the referrals)..
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 2 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
The Colorado Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and DeafBlind's collaboration with The Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering (CIDE) has greatly helped expand its Communications Technology Program (CTP) through their assessments, installation, and training of deaf and hard of hearing consumers in need of specialized phone devices, notification systems, etc.. The Commission provides the referrals and CIDE provides the demonstration/assessment, assists in the installation if necessary, and provides the on-site training.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Through our training and support, CTP consumers are able to confidently communicate with the community at large. We see an increase in our numbers annually and the consumer satisfaction and appreciation of the family is always high. This program has expanded our reach into the deaf and hard of hearing community and working with the Commission has provided opportunities to trial various forms of communication access much needed by the community. This collaboration has been ongoing for over the past 20 years and appears to be a great fit for both parties to increase their services.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
CIDE has partnered with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Office of Disability, Accessibility and Inclusion to support faculty in their efforts to accommodate student’s access to their curriculum; and students in their needs for accessibility, and assistive technology. The MOU calls for on-going technical assistance to be provided to the students, access to our clinical services, and training when requested.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
This collaboration has resulted in more students getting previously unavailable services they need, access to appropriate assistive technology, and increased access to the curriculum with better overall results and success in their education. The key to the success of this collaboration has been the continued communication between programs to address the student's needs as they arise instead of waiting until they become a problem. As other students have become aware of the program and it’s achievements, student participation has increased, with more students requesting assistance.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Health;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Demonstration; Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 02 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
CIDE has worked with the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management on the inclusion of assistive technology in the planning, response, and recovery stages of an emergency. Through our trainings we have seen an increase in the type and amount of assistive technology being provided at the mass care shelters and disaster assistance center. We have also seen a large increase in requests for information about specific assistive technology solutions from emergency managers and planners from across the state.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
We have developed an information fact sheet and checklist to assist individuals in documenting their assistive technologies to reduce the confusion in replacing equipment and assist with their rapid replacement. https://www.ucdenver.edu/docs/librariesprovider38/ep-documents/at-and-dme-equipment-list-final.pdf?sfvrsn=6399d2ba_2
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Community Living
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
The Colorado Assistive Technology Act Program team has worked closely with the Colorado Department of Early Childhood on a new program, Project Include which began in 2021.This project expands on a previous program, Inclusion and Universal Design. It supports the more than 4000 licensed Colorado family child care homes, child care centers, and preschools in Colorado. The program has provided training, technical assistance, and equipment to assist providers in creating more inclusive environments for children with delays and disabilities through access to assistive technology, training and technical assistance.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Currently over 400 programs have requested support. Over 110 have completed a 90 minute online training on Inclusion and Universal Design which includes numerous low tech examples for their programs. Over forty videos have been produced and posted on our website which explain adapted technologies and how to utilize them with children. These videos have been viewed more then 1000 times. The program has created 4 different adapted materials kits that are provided in short term loans to programs. The project web site is located at https://www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/center-for-inclusive-design-and-engineering/community-engagement/project-include and has numerous resources for providers. Contact Maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu for more information.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Education
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $88,420 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $24,675 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $312,101 | Device Loan | True |
Private | $280 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $45,849 | Training | True |
Private | $3,750 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $106,753 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $160,000 | Device Loan | True |
Private | $87,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $536,000 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $20,246 | Training | True |
Private | $20,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $89,000 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $104,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $26,199 | Device Loan | True |
Private | $8,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Private | $20,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $11,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $57,057 | Technical Assistance | True |
Private | $7,500 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $58,949 | Technical Assistance | True |
Private | $280 | Training | True |
Public/State Agency | $119,639 | Technical Assistance | True |
Amount: $1,906,698 |
B. Public Health Workforce Grant Award |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Section 4 AT Act grantees were awarded $80,000.00 in supplimental Public Health Workforce grant funding to increase the full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff withing the disability and aging network for public health professionals. Please document the status of these funds below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:27:42 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)