National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Colorado 2022

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Assistive Technology Program of Colorado
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/cide
Mailing Address:
1201 5th St., Suite 240
City:
Denver
State:
Colorado
Zip Code:
80204
Program Email:
cide@ucdenver.edu
Phone:
3033151280
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering
Mailing Address:
1201 5th St., Suite 240
City:
Denver
State:
CO
Zip Code:
80204
Program URL:
www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/cide

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Melonis, Maureen
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
303-315-1283
E-mail:
maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Melonis, Maureen
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
303-315-1283
E-mail:
maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Beems, Julia
Title:
Outreach Coordinator
Phone:
3033151284
E-mail:
julia.beems@ucdenver.edu

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Bocco, Jeanne
Title:
Senior Postaward Accountant
Phone:
303-724-1157
E-mail:
Alougbavi.Bocco@cuanschutz.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 0


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 06
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 52
C. Total 58

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients. 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 58

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 06 $250 $0 $250
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 06 $250 $0 $250

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 05 $277 $0 $277
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 25 $5,267 $0 $5,267
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 $341 $0 $341
Daily Living 04 $2,396 $0 $2,396
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 16 $34,408 $0 $34,408
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 52 $42,689 $0 $42,689

D. Anecdote

Developmental Disability Resource Center became an evaluation entity for Early Intervention in the state of Colorado in early 2022. In an effort to expand their evaluation sites and access to appropriate equipment and seating for those evaluation rooms, they acquired a long term loan of a Chairries seat from CIDE. They plan to use this sturdy, toddler-sized chair in combination with a small table for play-based assessments and anticipate that it will get a lot of use and be used by 4-5 children per day and make a big difference in their ability to evaluate children.

Toddler boy in red striped jumpsuit sitting in wooden toddler sized chair.
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 06 06
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 52 00 00 52
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 52 00 06 58
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 52 00 06 58
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 52 00 06 58
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 55 94.83%
Satisfied 03 5.17%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 58
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

We posted our newly developed AT Exchange site late summer so we only have 3 months of data.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 1,049
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 40
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 198
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 39
Total 1,326

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 29 08 37
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 44 05 49
Representative of Education 972 97 1,069
Representative of Employment 00 127 127
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 04 13 17
Representatives of Community Living 00 19 19
Representatives of Technology 00 08 08
Total 1,049 277 1,326

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 42

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 18 05 23
Hearing 14 03 17
Speech Communication 386 126 512
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 477 120 597
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 46 19 65
Daily Living 61 17 78
Environmental Adaptations 21 08 29
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 25 06 31
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 11 12
Total 1,049 315 1,364

E. Anecdote

Graham is a 24 year old young man with severe autism and profound speech and language disorders with very limited means of communication with the people around him causing frustration and frequent and frightening self-injurious behaviors. A caged hockey helmet, arm protection and mitts kept Graham safe from hurting himself. Working with one of our speech language pathologist, Graham was able to borrow a Touch Chat communication device and trial it at home. His family and caregivers learned how to use the device and work with him on a daily basis in a natural setting. Graham was able to learn how to use the device without prompting and revealed his ability to use a dynamic display, locate preferred foods, drinks, people and activities, and comment on his emotions. Because of the loan of the Touch Chat device, and the ability to trial the device to ensure it was the best solution before purchase, Graham’s parents are now better able to enjoy him and he no longer depends on his hockey helmet to keep himself safe as he is able to communicate his wants and needs to those around him.

Young adult male with curly hair in hockey mask with cage, thick layers of protective equipment and padded hand mitts. Young adult male with curly dark hair with big smile holding communication device
Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 235 00 22 257
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 579 00 28 607
Subtotal 814 00 50 864
Have not made a decision 185 00 00 185
Subtotal 999 00 50 1,049
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 999 00 50 1,049
Performance on this measure 81.48% NaN% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 224 00 04 228
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 25 00 16 41
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 06 01 08
4. Subtotal 250 06 21 277
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 250 06 21 277
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 250 06 21 277
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,029 77.6%
Satisfied 281 21.19%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 16 1.21%
Total Surveyed 1,326
Response rate % 98.79%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 03
Hearing 18
Speech Communication 77
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 03
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 182
Daily Living 01
Environmental Adaptations 03
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 18
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02
Total # of Device Demonstrations 307

B. Types of Participants

Type of Participant Decision-Makers Other Participants Total
Individuals with Disabilities 201 106 307
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 101 55 156
Representatives of Education 02 15 17
Representatives of Employment 00 01 01
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 03 29 32
Representative of Community Living 00 10 10
Representative of Technology 00 00 00
Total 307 216 523

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 79
Service Provider 85
Vendor 91
Repair Service 73
Others 02
Total 330

D. Anecdote

F. K. is a 3 year old with Cerebral Palsy born at 25 weeks with Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) and suffered from multiple brain bleeds. He could not explore his environment in an upright position. Now that his brain bleeds have stabilized, and his vision is improving, he is making progress with his motor skills. He is a curious child who is very motivated to explore his environment and loves moving around. He was given a device demonstration of The Gait Trainer. His family was so excited to try this device as it allowed him to stand on his own and gave him a new found independence and a new view of the world. After the trial, he was able to order his own Gait Trainer and they are now anxiously awaiting it's arrival.

Small boy smiling, standing in blue Gait Trainer
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 20 19 191 230
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 03 71 77
Subtotal 23 22 262 307
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 23 22 262 307
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 23 22 262 307
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 460 87.95%
Satisfied 63 12.05%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 523
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 224 00 10 234
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 77 00 16 93
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 06 01 08
4. Subtotal 302 06 27 335
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 302 06 27 335
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 302 06 27 335
9. Performance on this measure 99.67% 0% 96.3% 97.61%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 255 19 213 487
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 582 03 99 684
Subtotal 837 22 312 1,171
Have not made a decision 185 00 00 185
Subtotal 1,022 22 312 1,356
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 1,022 22 312 1,356
Performance on this measure 81.9% 100% 100% 86.36%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 100% 95% Met
Response Rate 99.16% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 60
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 57
Representatives of Education 1,804
Representatives of Employment 95
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 361
Representatives of Community Living 1,075
Representatives of Technology 143
Unable to Categorize 20
TOTAL 3,615

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
3,181 434 00 3,615

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 2,301
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 1,140
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 34
Transition 140
Total 3,615

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

Clinicians from the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado were invited to speak at the Special Care Clinic Educational Series meeting which serves as an educational event for the many physicians and clinicians within the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus System. The presentation provided an overview of the Assistive Technology Program of Colorado and the Center for Inclusion and Design and Engineering (CIDE). The presentation provided information about assistive technology, device demonstrations, device loans, the AT exchange and AT Funding programs. The presentation was attended by over 100 clinical staff including residents, from the different hospitals on campus and was recorded and placed on their internal educational drive for those who could not attend. Resources and links were offered as well as an update on available assistive technology. Following the presentation, numerous inquiries for our services were received in the following weeks.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Transition Leadership Institute - "Help! My student is a 12th grander and can't read! - Technology to access grade level and career text!" - Print disabilities are not quite the barrier they used to be, even just a few years ago. Advances in hardware and more importantly machine learning and artificial intelligence have leveled the playing field considerably. CIDE staff provided an interactive demonstration of the options available for reading printed and electronic text. The session was designed for individuals who work with students with print disabilities, especially those transitioning to employment settings; those who wanted to learn more about the assistive technologies built into the devices they already own; and those who had a keen interest in new technologies and how they may be implemented to support individuals with disabilities. Attendees walked away with a toolbox of options to support reading in the classroom and beyond.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

After providing an accessibility audit of Jefferson County Public Health Departments COVID-19 webpages, training was provided to the web content team and web development team to improve access by creating accessible PDF documents and marketing materials that were hosted on the domain. We continue to receive requests and provide technical assistance to the web content team members.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 00
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 34
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 34
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

We started using a new tracking system with monthly reminders for staff to complete, so our numbers have increased along with providing additional trainings.

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 40%
Employment 10%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 00%
Community Living 50%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 00%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

MarkIT Mobile Voting User Testing and Accessibility Review. CIDE was engaged to analyze the mobile voting app and create a user test plan, pilot the test plan with typical users, and conduct usability & assistive technology testing. Testing occured on three cohorts including individuals with cognitive disabilities, physical disabilities, and older adults. The assistive technology testing resulted in the firing of the original app development team due to the number of issues the developers couldn't fix and the hiring of a new team.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

One of the Colorado Community Centered Boards (CCB) approached our Tech for Tykes program and asked us to join one of their team meetings to discuss transition to Part B services. Several members of their team had questions about the transition process for AT as children age out of the Part C services. We joined their team meeting and presented to providers, service coordinators, and CCB managers on the process of what happens with AT during the transition process depending on the funding source and how to document the features of the AT that the child is benefiting from without naming a specific device in the transition report.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. NRRTS (National Registry of Rehabilitation Technology Suppliers) Directions article highlights the increasing need for wheeled mobility for those affected by Ehler’s Danlos Syndrome, a hypermobility disorder that has been on the rise in the recent years, especially during the COVID pandemic. The article discusses a case study of a young woman who was evaluated and assessed at our clinic for a manual wheelchair with a power assist device. Her equipment was successfully funded and she has been able to use her new mobility device with great success resulting in increased independence with mobility-related activities of daily living, energy conservation, improvement in function, strength, endurance and overall quality of life. The article was shared through a therapy trade magazine reaching approximately 10,000 industry professionals in all 50 states, Canada and Puerto Rico. This article has resulted in identifying CIDE as a leader in providing successful assistive technology solutions for individuals with Ehler’s Danlos Syndrome and increased our overall referrals to our clinic.

2. The Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering proudly hosted the 2022 Conference for Assistive Technology and Education (CATE). This 2-day, virtual conference event registered 237 participants from 30 different states and 4 countries. The schedule featured 2 workshops and 20 breakout sessions presented by nationally recognized leaders in the field including Therese Willkomm, Janet Sturm, Kelly Fonner, Donna McNear, Chris Bugaj, Beth Poss, Mo Buti, and Sarah Gregory, among others. The virtual platform supported over 3,000 messages between participants, 23 post-event Meet-Ups, 87 Discussion Topics, and 94 Community Board Posts. In a post-event survey, 94% of respondents indicated their participation would positively impact the achievement of individuals with disabilities.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 14,560 3,120 17,680
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 9,360 4,420 13,780
Representative of Education 16,900 3,640 20,540
Representative of Employment 2,340 520 2,860
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 10,400 1,820 12,220
Representative of Community Living 6,240 2,340 8,580
Representative of Technology 260 00 260
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 60,060 15,860 75,920

Referral Types:

Continued collaborations with our community partners provides for the majority of our referrals. As we continue to expand our services and train new providers our numbers continue to grow. Also, through our multiple advisory groups, we learn of barriers to services and acquisition of equipment and become a resource for those in need. Our early intervention providers and pre-school/day care programs referrals have increased through our Preschool Development Grant and Project Include programs.

Referral Sources:

Our state-wide community partners and collaborators continue to be our primary source of referrals. We work with 19 Community Centered Boards(10% of referrals) with 63 AT Consultants in our Tech for Tykes program; 72 school districts (25% of referrals) with 102 team coordinators and 409 SWAAAC members in our school AT program; Colorado Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, Deaf/Blind Denver metro area (2% of the referrals); Division of Vocational Rehabilitation 5 metro offices (10% of referrals); 128 Medical Professionals (50% of referrals) and 4 Equipment Vendors (3% of the referrals)..

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 2

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

The Colorado Commission for the Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and DeafBlind's collaboration with The Center for Inclusive Design and Engineering (CIDE) has greatly helped expand its Communications Technology Program (CTP) through their assessments, installation, and training of deaf and hard of hearing consumers in need of specialized phone devices, notification systems, etc.. The Commission provides the referrals and CIDE provides the demonstration/assessment, assists in the installation if necessary, and provides the on-site training.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

Through our training and support, CTP consumers are able to confidently communicate with the community at large. We see an increase in our numbers annually and the consumer satisfaction and appreciation of the family is always high. This program has expanded our reach into the deaf and hard of hearing community and working with the Commission has provided opportunities to trial various forms of communication access much needed by the community. This collaboration has been ongoing for over the past 20 years and appears to be a great fit for both parties to increase their services.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Veterans; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Demonstration; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;

A.2 Coordination/Collaboration (Entry 2)

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

CIDE has partnered with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus Office of Disability, Accessibility and Inclusion to support faculty in their efforts to accommodate student’s access to their curriculum; and students in their needs for accessibility, and assistive technology. The MOU calls for on-going technical assistance to be provided to the students, access to our clinical services, and training when requested.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

This collaboration has resulted in more students getting previously unavailable services they need, access to appropriate assistive technology, and increased access to the curriculum with better overall results and success in their education. The key to the success of this collaboration has been the continued communication between programs to address the student's needs as they arise instead of waiting until they become a problem. As other students have become aware of the program and it’s achievements, student participation has increased, with more students requesting assistance.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Education; Employment; Community Participation and Integration; Health;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Demonstration; Training; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 02

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

CIDE has worked with the Colorado Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management on the inclusion of assistive technology in the planning, response, and recovery stages of an emergency. Through our trainings we have seen an increase in the type and amount of assistive technology being provided at the mass care shelters and disaster assistance center. We have also seen a large increase in requests for information about specific assistive technology solutions from emergency managers and planners from across the state.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

We have developed an information fact sheet and checklist to assist individuals in documenting their assistive technologies to reduce the confusion in replacing equipment and assist with their rapid replacement. https://www.ucdenver.edu/docs/librariesprovider38/ep-documents/at-and-dme-equipment-list-final.pdf?sfvrsn=6399d2ba_2


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Community Living


B.2 State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The Colorado Assistive Technology Act Program team has worked closely with the Colorado Department of Early Childhood on a new program, Project Include which began in 2021.This project expands on a previous program, Inclusion and Universal Design. It supports the more than 4000 licensed Colorado family child care homes, child care centers, and preschools in Colorado. The program has provided training, technical assistance, and equipment to assist providers in creating more inclusive environments for children with delays and disabilities through access to assistive technology, training and technical assistance.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

Currently over 400 programs have requested support. Over 110 have completed a 90 minute online training on Inclusion and Universal Design which includes numerous low tech examples for their programs. Over forty videos have been produced and posted on our website which explain adapted technologies and how to utilize them with children. These videos have been viewed more then 1000 times. The program has created 4 different adapted materials kits that are provided in short term loans to programs. The project web site is located at https://www1.ucdenver.edu/centers/center-for-inclusive-design-and-engineering/community-engagement/project-include and has numerous resources for providers. Contact Maureen.melonis@ucdenver.edu for more information.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Education

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Public/State Agency$88,420TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$24,675Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$312,101Device LoanTrue
Private$280TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$45,849TrainingTrue
Private$3,750Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$106,753Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$160,000Device LoanTrue
Private$87,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$536,000TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$20,246TrainingTrue
Private$20,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$89,000TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$104,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$26,199Device LoanTrue
Private$8,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$20,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$11,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$57,057Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$7,500Technical AssistanceTrue
Public/State Agency$58,949Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$280TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$119,639Technical AssistanceTrue
Amount: $1,906,698

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Tue Feb 14 2023 16:27:42 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY22 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.