Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Telecommunications equipment distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 1 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 1 |
C. Total Served | 2 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded | Value of AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | 0.00 |
Hearing | 0 | 0.00 |
Speech communication | 0 | 0.00 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | 0.00 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 0 | 0.00 |
Daily living | 2 | 988.00 |
Environmental adaptations | 0 | 0.00 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 0 | 0.00 |
Computers and related | 0 | 0.00 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 0 | 0.00 |
Total | 2 | 988.00 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 1 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 25 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 4 |
C. Total Served | 29 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 0 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 29 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Hearing | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Speech communication | 3 | 390 | 0.00 | 390.00 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 3 | 168 | 3.00 | 165.00 |
Daily living | 8 | 1279 | 10.00 | 1269.00 |
Environmental adaptations | 8 | 988 | 33.00 | 955.00 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 2 | 2373 | 8.00 | 2365.00 |
Computers and related | 3 | 1859 | 162.00 | 1697.00 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 2 | 348 | 9.00 | 339.00 |
Total | 29 | 7405 | 225.00 | 7180.00 |
Gabriela (not her real name) is a very active and fiercely independent senior citizen with spinal chord injury (SCI). She uses a power chair and drives her van using adapted vehicle controls. However, her mobility was restricted by the fact that she could not operate the vehicle’s beeper remote independently due to the her limited hand control. She contacted the van’s dealer and the shop where the adaptive equipment is installed and she was amazed to find that, even for such an expensive adapted van, there was no remote control alternative other than the pocket sized regular beeper with the small inaccessible recessed buttons. She contacted PRATP looking for an alternative control system that she could use to access her van and, if possible, to also control her building’s automatic door opener which was also inaccessible to her. Through PRATP's AT fabrication initiative, an integrated radio-frequency (RF) control system was created. This adapted remote control had large buttons that where distributed and spaced according to Gabriela’s hand function and allowed her to control her buildings door opener and her van’s functions: lock/unlock, right/left door open/close, deploy/stow ramp and trunk open/close. The control was mounted on the armrest of Gabriela’s chair and she operates it with the side of her knuckle. Gabriela now feels completely independent as she can go in and out of her building and into her vehicle as she pleases.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 15 | 16 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 07 | 09 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 01 | 28 | 31 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 02 | 01 | 28 | 31 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 02 | 01 | 28 | 31 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 31 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 31 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 07 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 196 |
C. Total | 203 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 203 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $750 | $0 | $750 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 | $3,430 | $0 | $3,430 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 01 | $450 | $0 | $450 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 11 | $4,630 | $0 | $4,630 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 06 | $9,477 | $0 | $9,477 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 16 | $20,978 | $0 | $20,978 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 | $3,460 | $0 | $3,460 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 195 | $139,826 | $0 | $139,826 |
Daily Living | 20 | $6,478 | $0 | $6,478 |
Environmental Adaptations | 05 | $3,023 | $0 | $3,023 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 04 | $896 | $0 | $896 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 | $145 | $0 | $145 |
Total | 255 | $184,283 | $0 | $184,283 |
Jose (not his real name) is a 58-year-old man with limited mobility. His mother contacted PRATP to find alternatives for the acquisition of a power wheelchair that would allow Jose to move around independently. Due to the nature and severity of his condition, Jose needed a wheelchair that would address his particular characteristics and needs. However, the family could not afford such a device, so they requested PRATP’s help. An AT assessment on positioning and mobility was carried out to identify the necessary size and postural requirements for the needed wheelchair. Then, through PRATP’s Reuse Program, a suitable power wheelchair was identified, but it required some changes to match Jose’s needs. Size adjustments and postural modifications were made to the wheelchair to meet the characteristics identified during the assessment. Now, Jose has regained his mobility with a customized-reused power wheelchair that he and his family could not otherwise afford.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 01 | 122 | 127 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 20 | 20 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 10 | 00 | 40 | 50 |
4. Subtotal | 14 | 01 | 182 | 197 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 15 | 01 | 184 | 200 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
8. Total | 15 | 01 | 187 | 203 |
9. Performance on this measure | 93.33% | 100% | 97.33% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 183 | 90.15% |
Satisfied | 07 | 3.45% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 13 | 6.4% |
Total Surveyed | 203 | |
Response rate % | 93.6% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 25 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 00 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 13 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 08 |
Total | 46 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 20 | 11 | 31 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representative of Education | 01 | 06 | 07 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 02 | 02 | 04 |
Representatives of Community Living | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 25 | 21 | 46 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Hearing | 03 | 10 | 13 |
Speech Communication | 13 | 05 | 18 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 | 01 | 03 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 | 10 | 16 |
Daily Living | 06 | 10 | 16 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Computers and Related | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Total | 32 | 40 | 72 |
Fernando (not his real name) is an 8-year-old boy with a degenerative disorder that caused him to lose both speech and mobility. He can only perform slight movements of his head and, occasionally, one of his arms. Therefore, it is almost impossible for Fernando to call his mother when she is not in the same room, to control electronic devices, and to participate in play activities with his brother. Through PRATP’s AT loan program, Fernando was able to try out several AT devices, including a switch adapted bubble machine, a head-mounted switch, a USB switch interface for computer access and a switch adapted call alarm. It was very exciting to see how Fernando could activate the switch to interact with his family by calling his mother, blowing bubbles for his little brother to catch them and to access electronic games on his computer. The experience with the loaned equipment was invaluable for the family to decide that the AT devices were indeed an appropriate solution to augment Fernando’s capabilities in meaningful ways, including basic communication. Before the end of the loan period, PRATP helped the family select and acquire the appropriate devices for Fernando.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 06 | 02 | 15 | 23 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 06 | 02 | 16 | 24 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Subtotal | 07 | 02 | 16 | 25 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 07 | 02 | 16 | 25 |
Performance on this measure | 85.71% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 00 | 09 | 14 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 01 | 13 | 19 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 01 | 13 | 19 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
8. Total | 06 | 01 | 14 | 21 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 41 | 89.13% |
Satisfied | 03 | 6.52% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 4.35% |
Total Surveyed | 46 | |
Response rate % | 95.65% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 03 |
Hearing | 02 |
Speech Communication | 30 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 09 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 05 |
Daily Living | 05 |
Environmental Adaptations | 03 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 03 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 60 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 45 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 44 |
Representatives of Education | 01 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 11 |
Representative of Community Living | 01 |
Representative of Technology | 00 |
Total | 102 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 01 |
Service Provider | 01 |
Vendor | 11 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 13 |
Jorge (not his real name) is a 29-year-old man with quadriplegia due to a vehicle accident. Before the accident he worked as a mechanic for a local car distributor; however, with no movement from the neck down, he now spends most of his time in bed watching TV. Jorge’s family contacted PRATP after learning about it through the internet and social media. They were interested in learning about AT devices that would help Jorge find options to independently control his laptop and smartphone. Two demonstration services were set-up, one focusing in computer access and the other one on alternate controls for smartphone. During the demonstrations, Jorge had the opportunity to see, try-out and finally decide about the usefulness of an AT device to meet his needs. Several device options were presented, including eye tracking, head tracking, mouth controlled joystick, voice recognition and switch control, among others. He immediately selected head tracking as a viable alternative for computer access and a combination of Siri voice recognition and iOS voice control to access his iPhone. Jorge and her family were happy to learn about readily available tools that directly addressed Jorge’s needs for access and independence regarding electronic devices. They were particularly happy to learn that the access tools he liked most were available for free, since they had assumed that AT devices were quite expensive and probably out of their reach.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 27 | 03 | 26 | 56 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 27 | 03 | 27 | 57 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Subtotal | 27 | 03 | 28 | 58 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 28 | 03 | 29 | 60 |
Performance on this measure | 96.43% | 100% | 93.1% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 84 | 82.35% |
Satisfied | 10 | 9.8% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 08 | 7.84% |
Total | 102 | |
Response rate % | 92.16% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 09 | 01 | 137 | 147 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 02 | 37 | 39 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 12 | 00 | 49 | 61 |
4. Subtotal | 21 | 03 | 223 | 247 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 22 | 03 | 225 | 250 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 04 | 05 |
8. Total | 23 | 03 | 229 | 255 |
9. Performance on this measure | 40.91% | 100% | 76.32% | 73.52% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 33 | 05 | 41 | 79 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
Subtotal | 33 | 05 | 43 | 81 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Subtotal | 34 | 05 | 44 | 83 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Total | 35 | 05 | 45 | 85 |
Performance on this measure | 94.29% | 100% | 95.56% | 95.29% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 100% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 93.98% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 95 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 99 |
Representatives of Education | 843 |
Representatives of Employment | 94 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 189 |
Representatives of Community Living | 560 |
Representatives of Technology | 41 |
Unable to Categorize | 04 |
TOTAL | 1,925 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,870 | 49 | 06 | 1,925 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,400 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 299 |
Transition | 226 |
Total | 1,925 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
During FY 2021, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) provided the training “Assistive Technology Solutions in Emergency Situations” to 30 representatives of the Puerto Rico’s Core Advisory Groups (CAGs). In the aftermath of Hurricane María (2018), FEMA, and the Puerto Rico Emergency Management Bureau (PREMB) started the CAGs as a critical link to bridge the gap between emergency management efforts, individuals with disabilities and persons with access and functional needs. Since then, the CAGs have expanded their efforts Island-wide, changing the way emergency management is delivered in Puerto Rico, providing disability integration and awareness within all levels of the emergency management system. PRATP’s training focused on exploring assistive technology preparedness and response tools to address the particular needs of individuals with diverse disabilities before, during and after an emergency.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
As part of the training activities, and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, PRATP presented a training remote session on the topic of Assistive Technology as a tool in the Transition Process to support the Puerto Rico Family-to-Family Center (PR-F2FC). The PR-F2FC is a project of the Institute of Deficiencies in Development (IDD) of the Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico which its main objective is to offer support, information, resources in the community and the necessary tools for the family of children and young people with special health needs and / or intellectual and developmental disabilities. With a peer-to-peer approach, their staff are parents of children and youth with special health needs and / or intellectual and developmental disabilities who offer parent-to-parent support to all who seek their services. The main purpose of the training was to enable individuals with disabilities, their representatives, and others professionals, to increase knowledge, skills, and competencies around assistive technology (AT) and to help them make informed decisions about accessing and acquiring AT as part of planning the Transition process. A total of 106 participants were represented in the groups of education (44%), family members and people with disabilities (26%), representatives of health (18%), community life (6%) and representatives of technology 4%. The following objectives were covered: • Know the basic aspects of transition and what the services consist of • Define what is Assistive Technology • Offer an overview of local and federal laws that mandate the provision of AT equipment and services in the transition process. • Identify the importance of AT as part of the transition process for students with disabilities • Examine support tools, including AT as resources to facilitate and plan the course of the transition process As part of the final training, a question and answer session were held, as well as a discussion with providers, families, and individual that focused on the use of AT to support the transition process for their students with disabilities.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, PRATP conducted a series of training sessions on PowerPoint best practices and tools to create accessible virtual and face-to-face presentations. Training was provided to professors and IT personnel from different campuses of the University of Puerto Rico and other universities throughout the Island as well. Accessible design and development aspects were discussed as well as guidelines for accessible presentation delivery, captioning, alt-text, and descriptive links, among other areas. Follow-up technical assistance was provided to participants who wanted to integrate accessibility into their courses, develop IT accessibility trainings or to modify university policies and practices regarding IT accessibility.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 177 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 38 |
No known outcome at this time | 24 |
Nonrespondent | 60 |
Total | 299 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 71.9% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 64% |
---|---|
Employment | 1% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 2% |
Community Living | 23% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 10% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) provided technical assistance to the Puerto Rico Tribunal Administration Office (TAO, the Accessibility Program of the Judicial Branch, and the Court Improvement Program (Justice for Children Project) to create a Communication Board that would facilitate service provision to persons with disabilities in the Judicial Branch of Puerto Rico. First line service providers at the Judicial Branch participated in focus groups to identify barriers and critical incidents that limited the appropriate access to justice for individuals who have difficulty communicating. The results were used by PRATP’s AT Specialists to create a Communication Board that would help determine the best strategy for communicating with a person with disability or a non-Spanish or English speaker. As a result of this Technical Assistance, a portable two-sided communication board with a dry-erase writing area was created to be distributed Island-wide throughout the Judi
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Transition training activity reported.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. On September 2021, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) carried out an awareness campaign to promote its various services, particularly the Reuse initiative, and to request donations of gently used AT devices that could be reconditioned and provided to individuals with disabilities that could not otherwise access them. The campaign was promoted through social networks, radio, and the printed press. As a result, over 200 AT devices were received, covering the areas of positioning and mobility, learning and cognition, and communication., among others. The devices were promptly registered, refurbished, tested, and made available to persons with disabilities.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 243 | 03 | 246 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 405 | 05 | 410 |
Representative of Education | 116 | 09 | 125 |
Representative of Employment | 07 | 01 | 08 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 68 | 00 | 68 |
Representative of Community Living | 91 | 04 | 95 |
Representative of Technology | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Unable to Categorize | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 937 | 22 | 959 |
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 0 |
---|
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
State Appropriations | $30,000 | Reuse | True |
State Appropriations | $45,000 | State Financing | True |
State Appropriations | $35,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Private | $3,019 | State Financing | True |
State Appropriations | $50,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $40,000 | Device Loan | True |
State Appropriations | $50,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
State Appropriations | $20,000 | Demonstration | True |
Amount: $273,019 |
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 07 2022 11:20:59 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)