National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Maryland 2021

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Maryland Technology Assistance Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.mdtap.org
Mailing Address:
2301 Argonne Drive, Rm T42
City:
Baltimore
State:
Maryland
Zip Code:
21218
Program Email:
mdtap.general@maryland.gov
Phone:
410-554-9477
TTY:
1-866-881-7488

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Maryland Department of Disabilities
Mailing Address:
217 E Redwood Street, Suite 1300
City:
Baltimore
State:
Maryland
Zip Code:
21202
Program URL:
http://mdod.maryland.gov

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
MD
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
4105549477
E-mail:
lori.markland@maryland.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Brennan, John
Title:
Deputy Assistant Secretary
Phone:
410-767-3640
E-mail:
john.brennan@maryland.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Markland, Lori
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
410-554-9477
E-mail:
lori.markland@maryland.gov

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Brennan, John
Title:
Deputy Assistant Secretary
Phone:
410-767-3640
E-mail:
john.brennan@maryland.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 17 08 25
Approved Not made 17 07 24
Rejected 12 07 19
Total 46 22 68

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $9,708 Highest Income: $206,969

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$1,880,625 25 $75,225

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 02 03 02 05 03 10 25
Percentage of Loans 8% 12% 8% 20% 12% 40% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 04 16%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 21 84%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 25 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 25 $644,719
Total 25 $644,719

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 3%
Highest 3%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
75 25 3%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 25
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 25

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 02 $10,780
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 07 $234,583
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 02 $15,000
Vehicle modification and transportation 14 $384,356
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 25 $644,719

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 03
Net loss for loans in default $10,311

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)50
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)5
C. Total Served55

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures55

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 196283.00
Hearing 267208.00
Speech communication910310.00
Learning, cognition, and developmental 86044.00
Mobility, seating and positioning75958.00
Daily living 00.00
Environmental adaptations00.00
Vehicle modification and transportation 00.00
Computers and related 00.00
Recreation, sports, and leisure00.00
Total6935803.00



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Cooperative Buying Program

2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)128
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)1
C. Total Served129

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure84
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures45

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

School systems are required to purchase AT regardless of discounted AT purchases through the cooperative buying program.

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber ProvidedTotal Estimated
Current Retail
Purchase Price
Total Price for
Which Devices
Were Sold
Savings
to Consumers
Vision 9724099536793.004202.00
Hearing 1119601803.00157.00
Speech communication 2148393073333660.0059413.00
Learning, cognition, and developmental 11705268045204.007476.00
Mobility, seating and positioning 000.000.00
Daily living 4514121236.00176.00
Environmental adaptations 5795338604.00929.00
Vehicle modification and transportation 000.000.00
Computers and related 10926176854303.007465.00
Recreation, sports, and leisure 9308219771023.0011174.00
Total 6425643618552626.0090992.00


D. Anecdote

Churchville Lions Club in Harford county contacted us to see if AT Discount Sales & Services LLC, the cooperative buying program of Maryland, could help provide a much needed seating system for a family in need. They had a budget limit of $5,000 and were hoping to fully fund the equipment so there was no cost to the family. With the help of the child's school physical therapist the appropriate piece of equipment was identified. By purchasing this through AT Discount Sales & Services LLC they saved $842.25 and were able to fully fund the equipment with all the accessories needed. This new seating system allows the child the opportunity of a safe alternate position which gives them increased opportunities to be involved in rec and leisure activities.

Impact Area

The Assistive Technology Financial Loan Program (low interest financial loan program) provided a loan for Mr. & Mrs. S to purchase a modified vehicle to transport their growing, non-ambulatory child with cerebral palsy. The S family was initially approved on their own merit by the partner lender; however, the loan was later declined by the lender when the lender discovered that the high cost of the vehicle modifications exceeded the value of the vehicle. During the loan closing process, and after the initial loan program board review and approval, it was found that the co-borrower's income changed due to COVID-19 hardship, ultimately increasing the family's debt-to-income ratio. With the help of ATLP staff, the family was subsequently able to secure a guaranteed loan for the full cost of the vehicle and adaptations giving their family a safe way to transport their child.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 21 95 121
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 04 04
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 05 21 99 125
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 05 21 99 125
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 05 21 99 125
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 188 89.95%
Satisfied 13 6.22%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 08 3.83%
Total Surveyed 209
Response rate % 96.17%

G. Notes:

During FY21, MDTAP continued its efforts to increase marketing and awareness of the Assistive Technology Financial Loan Program, working with potential applicants and organizations to increase the number of loans made during this period. Although the loan issued rates are still lower than pre-COVID levels, the program is hopeful that these continued efforts will result in larger numbers of loans made in FY22. Additionally, MDTAP experienced a lapse in state contracts from 7/1/21 thru 9/30/21, resulting in lower numbers of those served through the cooperative buying program. This issue has since been resolved.

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 02
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 236
C. Total 238

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 01
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 237

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 $6,265 $2,000 $4,265
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 02 $6,265 $2,000 $4,265

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 11 $23,480 $0 $23,480
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 07 $22,626 $0 $22,626
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 19 $24,940 $0 $24,940
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 280 $427,975 $0 $427,975
Daily Living 37 $47,455 $0 $47,455
Environmental Adaptations 01 $1,500 $0 $1,500
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 $4,200 $0 $4,200
Total 356 $552,176 $0 $552,176

D. Anecdote

The Maryland AT Program runs the Maryland High-tech AT Reuse Center (MATR), a place where constituents, programs, and agencies can donate gently used AT, and the program cleans, repairs, and/or refurbishes those items for distribution back into the community. The High-tech AT Reuse Center launched in January 2020, but has only started to actively gain momentum with donations and redistributions because of the pause that was created during the onset of COVID 19. In May 2021, an educator in Baltimore county contacted MATR to see if she could help one of her students, a 10-year-old with multiple disabilities, access an eye gaze system to use at home. She facilitated the contact with MATR and coordinated the technology consultation with MATR's AT Specialist. Through this coordination, the student was able to acquire a donated eye gaze system for home use, and is now able to access communication and the internet while at home. He's also able to communicate wants and needs with his family, and connect with family members living in the Philippines. One additional and unintended impact is that he enjoys researching things he's learning in school and can now use the system at home to explore things he would not have access to otherwise. With this equipment, he's thriving in school and his world has been expanded at home with the eye-gaze system acquired through MATR.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 06 01 225 232
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 00 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 07 01 229 237
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 07 01 229 237
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 07 01 229 237
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 237 99.58%
Satisfied 01 0.42%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 238
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

In FY21, device repair/refurbishment activities resumed at a higher level (as COVID 19 recovery efforts took place), and the Maryland High Tech AT Reuse Center returned to in-person coverage and more equipment distributions took place.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 104
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 12
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 13
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 03
Total 132

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 58 25 83
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 21 00 21
Representative of Education 10 00 10
Representative of Employment 01 00 01
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 08 00 08
Representatives of Community Living 05 02 07
Representatives of Technology 01 01 02
Total 104 28 132

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 55 05 60
Hearing 06 01 07
Speech Communication 32 01 33
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 04 00 04
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02 01 03
Daily Living 07 02 09
Environmental Adaptations 15 17 32
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 42 02 44
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 00 01
Total 164 29 193

E. Anecdote

One of our clients, Ms. W, borrowed a Pocket Talker Ultra from MDTAP in preparation for a regional staff meeting that was coming. It was vital for Ms. W to be able to hear her colleagues better. She has age-related hearing loss and wanted to borrow a device to help her compensate in a louder, noisy conference-room environment. Ms. W was able to borrow the Pocket Talker and utilize it during the regional staff meeting. After the loan was concluded, Ms. W. reached out to tell us, “This device worked so well and really improved my ability to hear everyone at the meeting. I even let a couple of my colleagues try it out and they want to purchase one of these as well!” MDTAP staff was then able to help her find a vendor online and make the purchase.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 18 07 47 72
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 05 16 24
Subtotal 21 12 63 96
Have not made a decision 02 00 06 08
Subtotal 23 12 69 104
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 23 12 69 104
Performance on this measure 91.3% 100% 91.3%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 20 20
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 01 00 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 00 01
4. Subtotal 01 01 22 24
5. None of the above 01 00 03 04
6. Subtotal 02 01 25 28
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 02 01 25 28
9. Performance on this measure 50% 100% 88%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 124 93.94%
Satisfied 05 3.79%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.76%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.76%
Nonrespondent 01 0.76%
Total Surveyed 132
Response rate % 99.24%

I. Notes:

As the state moved into COVID recovery efforts in FY21, MDTAP's device loans began to pick back up, moving closer to pre-Covid levels. We did, however, experience a gap in regional statewide services between 7/1/21 thru 9/30/21 (the last quarter of the federal reporting period), which resulted in fewer device loans in the three outlying regions of Maryland - Western Maryland, Southern Maryland, and Eastern Shore. Although our central office was able to accommodate requests for shipping devices for device loans and virtual demonstrations in these regions, our regional contractors were unable to participate in community driven device loans because of a lapse in contracts. This has since been resolved and we anticipate a steady increase in device loans in federal fiscal year 2022.

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 43
Hearing 09
Speech Communication 08
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 04
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 02
Daily Living 06
Environmental Adaptations 04
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 08
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 85

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 55
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 28
Representatives of Education 07
Representatives of Employment 01
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 06
Representative of Community Living 12
Representative of Technology 00
Total 109

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 05
Service Provider 01
Vendor 08
Repair Service 00
Others 03
Total 17

D. Anecdote

After the conclusion of our AT @ Work for Seniors Training (which the G family attended), Mr. G reached out to MDTAP for an AT consultation and equipment demonstrations. He, his wife, and their son, came into the library together at which point staff was able to demonstrate a number of devices for each of them including blind-low vision video magnifiers e.g.: the Ruby XL HD, The Topaz HD 24” CCTV, and the Humanware Connect 12 (with OCR capabilities) to show Mr. G a range of items that may benefit his ability to read various documents, mail, books, etc. Staff was able to work with Ms. G and show her items that may help with her Arthritis e.g.: built up handles for silverware, toothbrush, etc. so that she wouldn’t have to close her hand as tight to preserve her joints and decrease pain / inflammation. Staff was also able to demonstrate for her adaptive door knobs that can alter a round doorknob into one with a handle to ease the hand movements and strain on distal upper extremity joints when turning knobs, as well as adaptive jar openers that will ease with the function of turning and opening jars with arthritis. And for the son, staff was able to demonstrate various apps for tablets and smart phones to assist him with scheduling his daily activities i.e. Reminder, Reminders, with Voice and another app to help with literacy and reading through the use of OCR capabilities: Seeing AI. Our device demonstrations have resumed their in-person style as well as virtual (through Zoom, or Google Meets) in an effort to reach as many individuals throughout the state who may not feel comfortable with in-person contact, or have limited transportation.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 10 07 51 68
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 01 01 08 10
Subtotal 11 08 59 78
Have not made a decision 01 00 06 07
Subtotal 12 08 65 85
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 12 08 65 85
Performance on this measure 91.67% 100% 90.77%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 105 96.33%
Satisfied 04 3.67%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 109
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

As the state moved into COVID recovery efforts in FY21, MDTAP's device loans began to pick back up, moving closer to pre-Covid levels. We did, however, experience a gap in regional statewide services between 7/1/21 thru 9/30/21 (the last quarter of the federal reporting period), which resulted in fewer device loans in the three outlying regions of Maryland - Western Maryland, Southern Maryland, and Eastern Shore. Although our central office was able to accommodate requests for shipping devices for device loans and virtual demonstrations in these regions, our regional contractors were unable to participate in community driven device demonstrations because of a lapse in contracts. This has since been resolved and we anticipate a steady increase in device demonstrations in federal fiscal year 2022.

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 11 22 340 373
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 02 00 08 10
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 02 03
4. Subtotal 13 23 350 386
5. None of the above 01 00 03 04
6. Subtotal 14 23 353 390
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 14 23 353 390
9. Performance on this measure 92.86% 95.65% 98.58% 98.21%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 28 14 98 140
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 04 06 24 34
Subtotal 32 20 122 174
Have not made a decision 03 00 12 15
Subtotal 35 20 134 189
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 35 20 134 189
Performance on this measure 91.43% 100% 91.04% 92.06%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.71% 95% Met
Response Rate 98.69% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 101
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 38
Representatives of Education 151
Representatives of Employment 174
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 100
Representatives of Community Living 73
Representatives of Technology 91
Unable to Categorize 123
TOTAL 851

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
764 49 38 851

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 333
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 25
Combination of any/all of the above 84
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 284
Transition 125
Total 851

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

On February 17th, MDTAP conducted a training on "AT to Combat Social Isolation." This training addressed an important and pertinent dilemma that many Marylanders (Americans) faced which arose secondary to the pandemic in regard to the stay-at-home orders and the halting of many businesses, health care services, social gatherings, etc. As Marylanders took the time to heal and keep loved ones safe a new dilemma came to light: the feeling of isolation and loneliness. Marylanders who didn’t have the technology to keep them in touch with their support groups, churches, adult day services, may have increased feelings of depression, suicidal ideation, loneliness, helplessness. We at MDTAP felt this was something that needed to be addressed through a training of what technology was available that could help bridge these gaps in isolation and increase individuals ability to connect with their respective groups, tribes, families, friends, and the like. We had 66 individuals across 15 different counties in Maryland with different disciplines (health representatives, technology representatives, individuals with disabilities etc.) in attendance. This training covered key vocabulary (e.g. social isolation vs loneliness) and the impact of social isolation on mental and physical health, and offered numerous technology interventions (some free and others various pricing) to increase interactions with friends, family, and various organizations. This training lead to multiple individuals reaching out in regards to learning more about the technology explored in the slide deck, how to utilize it, and what type of internet connection is needed, etc. A number of health care, tech, and community representatives reached out just to convey how helpful this training was and that the information presented was very relevant and helpful to give individuals the knowledge and options to stay engaged with others.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

A certified ATP provided training on assistive technology and transitioning: middle school to high school; high school to post-graduation; hospital or assisted living to home. There were 81 attendees from all categories (Individuals with disabilities, Community Living, Reps of Education, Reps of Employment, Family, Reps of Health, and Technology) and 17 of the state's 23 counties. A representative of education thought the presentation would benefit their special educators with transitioning students, so our AT Specialist repeated the presentation to 44 staff members. Information on the types of transitions and how to acquire AT once a student is ready to transition from school to higher education or out of public education was shared. The positive impact was that attendees gained valuable information on how to assist their students to obtain the AT the need through and after transition.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

On April 20th, ICT staff hosted a training session on Video Conferencing Accessibility, as a direct result of ongoing inquiries at the state level about the accessibility functionality in various web conferencing platforms. This session had 63 participants representing state agencies, education institutions, technology representatives, and more. The session focused on alternatives for accessibility in video conferencing including: captioning, accessible materials, language use and narration, and sign language interpretation. Staff provided a demonstration of how to make accessible materials, such as slide decks and PDFs, and participants learned about specific capabilities within multiple platforms including Google Meets, Microsoft Teams, Cisco WebEx, and Zoom.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 74
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 104
No known outcome at this time 102
Nonrespondent 04
Total 284
Performance Measure Percentage 62.7%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

During FY21, MDTAP increased its virtual trainings on a variety of AT-specific and ICT topics. As a result of the pandemic, we have increased our trainings and identified a more successful method for capturing training data. In FY22, we will focus on increasing the performance measure targets for ICT to better capture the results from our ICT trainings.

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 15%
Employment 24%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation %
Community Living %
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 61%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The Maryland IT Accessibility team, part of the MDTAP staff, met with the Digital Accessibility Coordinator for the State of Michigan to discuss how Maryland has established a statewide, interagency approach to procuring accessible IT and evaluating current state websites. The team provided guidance on Maryland's practices and followed up with an additional meeting with Michigan state government employees in the office of civil rights and digital access. We anticipate an ongoing collaboration with Michigan as they implement ways to improve and expand their statewide accessibility approach.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

The Maryland AT program has been part of the Statewide Interagency Transition Council - a council comprised of state agency representatives, local transition council reps, vocational rehabilitation representatives, and more. In October 2020, MDTAP worked with IATC members to contribute to and finalize two transition documents - the Student Resource Map and the State Agencies’ Transition Collaborative of Maryland (SATC-MD) guide. Both documents are available to those involved in the transition process at a local district level, including educators, parents, and students, and provides guidance on programs and steps during the transition from school to higher education or the workforce. Both documents include technology as a key part of the successful transition process.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. MDTAP staff hosted a session on assistive technology services and AT demonstrations during the Arc of Maryland's Partners in Policymaking event. This multi-day virtual program brings together advocates, people with I/DD, people with physical disabilities, service providers, family members, and others to explore AT resources and services. The intent of the program is to empower, educate, and inform so that people with disabilities, family members, and providers can better advocate for change and inclusion on a legislative platform. We had 31 attendees during this session.

2. MDTAP staff presented on assistive technology and AT services during the annual conference for Maryland Service Coordinators. This brought together nearly 100 service coordinators from across the state to learn about AT, how to implement AT when working with constituents, when to make a referral to the MDTAP program, and included a demonstration of some AT devices that can support the varied needs of consumers. This session also included information on funding AT, various methods to include AT in waivers, and additional services across the state that can be combined to support the AT needs of Marylanders.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 148 19 167
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 76 12 88
Representative of Education 34 92 126
Representative of Employment 04 32 36
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 35 02 37
Representative of Community Living 90 23 113
Representative of Technology 02 01 03
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 389 181 570

Notes:

MDTAP is working on a strategy to increase outreach with a direct intent of increasing our Information & Assistance data in FY22. We believe that a part of the decline in numbers between FY20 and FY21 is directly related to fewer constituent requests during COVID and a lapse in our regional contract services for the final quarter of FY21. With contracts back in place, more targeted outreach strategies developed, and a more nuanced system for recording assistance calls and emails, we anticipate having I&A data return to pre-Covid levels in FY22.

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

During FY21, MDTAP has established an ongoing partnership with the Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA), to begin developing a plan for the state's Technology First Initiative. This initiative will be a multi-year, multi-agency/organization approach to ensuring that technology is considered as a first option for people with disabilities, particularly when receiving services through providers and funding through waivers. This effort is directed by the DDA with MDTAP serving in a key-partner role, with the intent that the AT libraries will be instrumental in allowing for people with disabilities, family members, and providers to explore appropriate technology solutions and seek expert advice before implementing a solution.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

This work is ongoing and more direct impacts will be measured in the coming fiscal year, but MDTAP has worked on a technology process map and outreach goals with DDA, we have contributed to the creation of the Statewide Technology Taskforce, we maintain a chair on the Taskforce and the workgroups, and we meet monthly in direct consultation with DDA to help guide this project. As a result, we have connected with a number of organizations and agencies that are learning more about our services and better understanding the AT acquisition processes in Maryland.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Housing / Home Automation; Community Participation and Integration; Health;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 01

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

The Maryland ICT team worked directly with the Office of State Procurement to develop and implement a training module on the laws & processes around procuring accessible information technology. This collaboration included work with Department of General Services (which oversees a portion of all state procurement AND all ongoing training of procurement officers) AND Department of Information Technology (DoIT).


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

The developed curriculum is now integrated into the standard Maryland OSP training program, which is a mandated training for all state procurement officers. The training highlights the necessity for including IT Accessibility in all state RFPs, evaluating vendor claims of accessibility, and implementing a checks & balances system before awarding IT procurements when accessibility is required. For more information on this module, email andrew.drummond@maryland.gov, Director of IT Accessibility Policy & Programs with the Maryland Department of Disabilities.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Technology (ICT accessibility and AT


Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Private$7,500TrainingTrue
Amount: $7,500

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


B. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 07 2022 11:06:52 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY21 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.