National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Connecticut 2021

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Connecticut Tech Act Project
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.CTtechact.com
Mailing Address:
55 Farmington Avenue, 12th Floor
City:
Hartford
State:
CT
Zip Code:
06105
Program Email:
arlene.lugo@ct.gov
Phone:
860-803-0588
TTY:
711

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Bureau of Rehabilitation Services
Mailing Address:
55 Farmington Avenue, 12th Floor
City:
Hartford
State:
CT
Zip Code:
06105
Program URL:
www.CT.gov/BRS

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Lugo, Arlene
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
860-803-0588
E-mail:
arlene.lugo@ct.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Doukas, David
Title:
Vocational Rehabilitation Director
Phone:
860-424-4862
E-mail:
David.Doukas@ct.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Doukas, David
Title:
Vocational Rehabilitation Director
Phone:
860-424-4862
E-mail:
David.Doukas@ct.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 03 00 03
Approved Not made 00 00 00
Rejected 00 00 00
Total 03 00 03

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $11,124 Highest Income: $91,000

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$148,660 03 $49,553

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 01 00 00 01 00 01 03
Percentage of Loans 33.33% 0% 0% 33.33% 0% 33.33% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 03 100%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 03 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 03 $62,470
Total 03 $62,470

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4%
Highest 5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
13 03 4.33333333333333%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 02
4.1% to 6.0% 01
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 03

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 00 $0
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 03 $62,470
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 03 $62,470

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 03
Net loss for loans in default $38,289

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)6
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)0
C. Total Served6

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures6

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 158392.00
Hearing 156.00
Speech communication00.00
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00.00
Mobility, seating and positioning00.00
Daily living 00.00
Environmental adaptations00.00
Vehicle modification and transportation 00.00
Computers and related 00.00
Recreation, sports, and leisure00.00
Total168448.00



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 0

D. Anecdote

One of our AT Loan Program applicants is also a para-Olympian in training for the 2022 Winter Olympics requiring him to drive many miles to across the country. His older vehicle had high mileage and he no longer felt safe relying on it for transportation to work as a teacher and tutor or to training and competitions. Although he was a former loan borrower in good standing and we recommended the loan to our bank partner, they declined to provide the loan through their usual methods. Not to be discouraged the applicant appealed the decision and the Advisory Board unanimously approved the loan with a 100% guarantee. The CT Tech Act Project was able to grant the loan and the Bureau of Rehabilitation Services assisted in covering the costs of the modifications he required in order to be able to transport himself to and from work. After receiving his new vehicle, the borrower contacted us to say “I love my new van!!!” He has been a reliable borrower making all of his payments and in fact, “came into money” and was able to turnaround and pay off the loan within a few months. We wish him the best as he competes in the upcoming Olympics as an American Curler!

Para Olympian and AT Loan borrower showing his curling on the ice. Image from UConn Magazine
Impact Area

A former AT Loan borrower returned for services from the CT AT Act Program. As her disability progressed, she became eligible for our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program. She received several devices from our program including an iMac and Microsoft Office which allowed her to participate in a virtual Social Media Marketing internship and in virtual classes through the Helen Keller National Center. Her devices “made it much easier” for her to stay organized, take notes during class, track her to-do lists, write letters, use social media and more. When asked about her experience, she stated, “I’m truly thankful for everything that the Access Through Technology program has provided me with and all the support their staff have given me. I can’t say enough good things about my experience with their program and their awesome staff.”

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 02 03 03 08
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 01 01
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 02 03 04 09
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 02 03 04 09
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 02 03 04 09
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 08 88.89%
Satisfied 01 11.11%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 09
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Grant / Additional funding: We were able to secure $30,000 in grant funding for an applicant who was likely going to be denied a loan. This grant allowed her to obtain the modified vehicle she needed. For another applicant, he received an additional $30,048 in external funding from the Vocational Rehabilitation program to pay for his vehicle modifications. Defaulted Loans: Two out of the three defaulted loans ($16,485) were sent to collections and we paid the percentage of loan guarantee per agreement. For the third defaulted loan, the borrower eventually paid the loan in full in the amount of $21,803. Due to ongoing COVID pandemic, loan applications were greatly reduced from pre-COVID numbers. We expect to be able to do additional outreach in the new year to begin increasing the number of applications and serving more individuals.

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 01
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 534
C. Total 535

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 535

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 01 $500 $100 $400
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 01 $500 $100 $400

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 15 $16,241 $2,410 $13,831
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 12 $3,570 $0 $3,570
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 06 $690 $250 $440
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 361 $215,460 $30,632 $184,828
Daily Living 167 $26,640 $6,086 $20,554
Environmental Adaptations 04 $764 $295 $469
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 30 $8,366 $15 $8,351
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 05 $5,500 $280 $5,220
Total 600 $277,231 $39,968 $237,263

D. Anecdote

The CT AT Act program received a call from an older gentleman who is blind and married to a woman who is also blind. He had been using an old HIMS notetaker from about 2009. The battery no longer worked, and he could only use it while it was plugged in which made it impossible for him to take it with him on the go. He called around to try to find a replacement battery but given the unit’s age, he could not find one. His timing was perfect because when he called, it just so happened, we received two braille notetakers back from our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program evaluator inventory as the units were outdated, and no longer being used or recommended. We were planning to put them into our reuse program. The individual was given the opportunity to borrow both devices to see if either one would meet his needs. One of them did work and he was very happy to have a working device that was in great condition and offered him a huge cost savings.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 09 14 435 458
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 02 01 74 77
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 11 15 509 535
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 11 15 509 535
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 11 15 509 535
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 524 97.94%
Satisfied 09 1.68%
Satisfied somewhat 02 0.37%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 535
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19, Reuse activities were opened primarily by appointment only. The number of individuals participating in reuse activities along with the number of devices and cost savings are lower compared to pre-pandemic numbers. We hope to be able to increase the number of individuals served in this new year as individuals return to community activities.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 221
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 21
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 66
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 23
Total 331

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 57 61 118
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 04 01 05
Representative of Education 100 46 146
Representative of Employment 00 00 00
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 15 01 16
Representatives of Community Living 45 00 45
Representatives of Technology 00 01 01
Total 221 110 331

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 03 00 03
Hearing 03 04 07
Speech Communication 237 58 295
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 67 03 70
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 00 00
Daily Living 07 00 07
Environmental Adaptations 37 60 97
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 195 76 271
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02 00 02
Total 551 201 752

E. Anecdote

Justice, a 9-year old student on the Autism Spectrum, needed a way to engage with school from the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Learning from home was the new reality for many students, and as schools found out through these new expectations: not all students had equal access to remote learning. Many students like Justice needed access in more than one way: requiring access to technologies that they did not have at home and access to the curriculum due to their unique learning differences based on an array of disabilities. Special education services that readily took place in school buildings now needed to be delivered remotely at home. Justice benefited from CT AT Act Program partner agency “The Assistive Technology Training Center of CT” (ATECH) Device Lending Library. ATECH provided Justice with a Samsung Tablet with ClassLink for remote classroom access, apps that were being used at his school, and a range of educationally appropriate apps selected to address Justice’s specific learning needs, including math, science, and literacy apps and supports. The tablet and apps worked out so well for Justice, that at the end of the device loan period his guardian was able to purchase a tablet and downloaded all of the apps that were used on the loaned device.

Justice using a borrowed iPad with apps to access school
Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 86 06 85 177
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 21 01 03 25
Subtotal 107 07 88 202
Have not made a decision 07 01 07 15
Subtotal 114 08 95 217
Nonrespondent 02 02 00 04
Total 116 10 95 221
Performance on this measure 93.86% 87.5% 92.63%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 21 01 01 23
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 16 01 42 59
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 06 00 01 07
4. Subtotal 43 02 44 89
5. None of the above 20 00 01 21
6. Subtotal 63 02 45 110
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 63 02 45 110
9. Performance on this measure 68.25% 100% 97.78%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 286 86.4%
Satisfied 38 11.48%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.3%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.3%
Nonrespondent 05 1.51%
Total Surveyed 331
Response rate % 98.49%

I. Notes:

Due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19, AT Loan activities were challenging to provide. Pre-pandemic, delivering devices to individuals was done face to face. There was no budget for mailing items to individuals. Because of COVID-19, we moved to mailing devices to consumers directly and provided virtual supports to help them utilize the device. This took place with mixed results and it was more challenging to get items back and to collect responses for Performance Measures. Later in the fiscal year both face to face and mailing of devices were used. We hope to be able to increase the number of individuals served in this new year and resume a greater amount of face to face services to improve the quality of services and the engagement with the AT Act Program and AT Partners in order to better obtain the performance measures required.

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 11
Hearing 00
Speech Communication 100
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 78
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 01
Daily Living 30
Environmental Adaptations 14
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 44
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 06
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 284

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 205
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 123
Representatives of Education 606
Representatives of Employment 02
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 40
Representative of Community Living 17
Representative of Technology 08
Total 1,001

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 16
Service Provider 22
Vendor 744
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 782

D. Anecdote

Joshua moved into a cluster apartment – his main goal was to be as independent and safe as possible at home. To help him achieve his goal, CT AT Act partner agency, ATECH, conducted AT demonstrations on a variety of daily living devices and a range of assistive technology tools. Joshua has trouble remembering to take his medications, the Med-Minder Jon was demonstrated because of specific features such as locking other med slots so only the meds he needs to take are available to him. Another device demonstrated was the Claris Companion to allow Joshua to video chat feature with staff when he needed assistance with something in his home. This device has a feature to only allow contacts programmed and approved in the device to be called adding additional safety. Other devices demonstrated that met his needs included the Ring Peephole Video doorbell, the CookStop, and the Microwave Safe-T Sensor. All of these items were put in place for Joshua as a result of the AT demonstration and it has allowed him to achieve his goal of living independently and safely.

Joshua, with a big smile, next to his med-minder device and Claris Companion
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 205 10 62 277
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 00 01 04
Subtotal 208 10 63 281
Have not made a decision 02 00 01 03
Subtotal 210 10 64 284
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 210 10 64 284
Performance on this measure 99.05% 100% 98.44%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 773 77.22%
Satisfied 210 20.98%
Satisfied somewhat 18 1.8%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 1,001
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Due to the ongoing impact of COVID-19, AT Demo activities were challenging to provide. The AT Act Program and Partner agencies utilized virtual platforms which were less effective and began conducting in person demonstrations later in the fiscal year but not to the degree we did pre-pandemic. As a result, the number of individuals participating in AT demo activities are lower than we would like. We hope to be able to increase the number of individuals served in this new year as individuals return to community activities.

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 32 18 439 489
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 18 02 117 137
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 06 00 01 07
4. Subtotal 56 20 557 633
5. None of the above 20 00 01 21
6. Subtotal 76 20 558 654
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 76 20 558 654
9. Performance on this measure 65.79% 100% 99.64% 95.72%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 291 16 147 454
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 24 01 04 29
Subtotal 315 17 151 483
Have not made a decision 09 01 08 18
Subtotal 324 18 159 501
Nonrespondent 02 02 00 04
Total 326 20 159 505
Performance on this measure 97.22% 94.44% 94.97% 96.41%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 98.82% 95% Met
Response Rate 99.73% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 165
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 68
Representatives of Education 1,824
Representatives of Employment 66
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 128
Representatives of Community Living 108
Representatives of Technology 69
Unable to Categorize 221
TOTAL 2,649

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
2,191 458 00 2,649

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 1,385
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 49
Combination of any/all of the above 1,078
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 119
Transition 18
Total 2,649

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

AT Act partner agency CREC provided a training titled, "Using Engaging Strategies for Online Learning" where 42 participants learned how to engage their AT and AAC users within online learning tasks. These teachers had not been very familiar with strategies before the pandemic started for distance learning. They had a few tools in their toolkit. However, after this training, they reported that they were able to use many of the tools in order to better engage their students - particularly students who rely on AT and AAC - in a distance learning setting.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

AT Act partner agency EASTCONN provided a training to 7 Transition students with disabilities receiving 18-22 Transition Services. Topics covered included: What is AT and How Can it Help Me Now in School; How do I get it what I need to succeed in Education, Work and Community Settings; and, How AT can assist in Post-secondary, Work and Community. Students learned about technology that they were not familiar with. A variety of AT devices were provided as well as discussion of how these devices could be helpful in future school, work and community settings.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

AT Act Partner, EASTCONN providing training on "Digital Accessibility: A How to Guide for Word and PDFs" to the statewide Transition Community of Practice, which is a quarterly statewide meeting for special education directors, transition specialists and providers. 61 participants attended the training and received an introduction to making Word Documents and PDF Files accessible. Participants learned about the Accessibility Checker, editing alt text, the use of document styles, etc. In PDFs, the use of the accessibility checker, reading order and tags was also explained. A demonstration of a screen reader accessing an inaccessible and accessible document was demonstrated to emphasize the importance of document accessibility.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 32
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 22
No known outcome at this time 20
Nonrespondent 45
Total 119
Performance Measure Percentage 45.4%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

Due to COVID a majority of our trainings, if not all, moved to a virtual platform. This was one service that translated easier from in person to virtual delivery. However, one area we found more challenging about providing virtual trainings was ensuring that performance measure data was completed. This data was collected via survey link which many participants willingly utilized and followed through on, but many did not, no matter how many follow up emails we sent. As a result for ICT training we had an high amount of non respondents without the capacity to place individual calls to each of them.

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education %
Employment 70%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 3%
Community Living 27%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) %
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic & the Stay Home, Stay Safe orders, the CT Vocational Rehabilitation remained open to serve consumers 100% virtually. However there were many consumers who did not have access to the proper technology to be able to engage with their VR Counselors or to access VR services, meet with Community Rehabilitation Providers, or participate in school as part of their VR services. AT Act Program Director suggested the pursuit of the Tablet Technology Initiative to provide VR consumers with the technology they would need to be able to participate in VR services. With approval from the VR Director and working in partnership with Bureau of Rehabilitation Services colleagues, Program Director was able to provide the necessary TA to help to quickly and successfully establish this program, including researching devices to provide choice and the best match for consumer; assisting with the creation of new VR services, writing policies and guidelines for VR counselors to follo

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Due to COVID-19 pandemic, CT AT Act Program Director did not have the opportunity to provide TA for transition.

C. Notes:

Due to COVID-19 pandemic, CT AT Act Program Director did not have the opportunity to provide TA for transition. NOTE: Some TA activities could have been listed under Technology but were listed under Employment or Community Living due to the dual nature of the TA.

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. The Consumer Electronics Show (CES) is an annual trade show organized by the Consumer Technology Association. The event typically hosts presentations of new products and technologies in the consumer electronics industry. AT Act Partner, the NEAT Center, participated in the CES 2021, which was completely virtual. NEAT staff was interviewed about their Smart Home on Wheels (the SHOW) and their partnership with the Consumer Technology Association Foundation. The SHOW was created specifically with support from the CT AT Act Program, to be able to show consumers smart home technology they may be able to use in their homes to increase independence and improve their quality of life. The SHOW has become quite a hit, making appearances at AT and technology events in New England and beyond. This interview was aired during CES 2021, over 175,000 typically attend this event. To watch the interview visit https://cta.tech/Who-We-Are/CTA-Foundation/CES-2021, scroll down the interviews on the right panel to find "Kristopher Thompson New England Assistive Technology Oak Hill."

2. CT AT Program, Partner Agency EASTCONN presented at ATIA in 2021 on the topic of "Digital Accessibility: A How to Guide for Word and PDF Documents". This ICT session provided an excellent opportunity for the 163 attendees to learn about the importance of digital accessibility and learn some of the steps to actually creating accessible word and PDF documents. They were also provided information about where they could learn more - through AT ACT ICT trainings. Feedback received from this presentation session demonstrated a desire among the attendees to learn more and to pursue additional training. Feedback included, "So much great information pack into a small amount of time," "I want to know MORE!"

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 297 37 334
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 204 20 224
Representative of Education 295 08 303
Representative of Employment 70 00 70
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 105 04 109
Representative of Community Living 327 12 339
Representative of Technology 81 01 82
Unable to Categorize 16 00 16
Total 1,395 82 1,477

Notes:

Most I&A data is captured by AT Partners via the individuals' participation in other services, such as Reuse, Demo, Device lending, and trainings.

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 1

A. Coordination/Collaboration

1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?

Using CARES Act funding, the CT State Unit on Aging approached the CT state AT Act program to collaborate and develop a program to help socially isolated adults, 60 and older, and individuals with disabilities, 18 and older, in Connecticut to have access to technology to remain connected with family, friends, telehealth, and their communities, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The "Stay Connected" program was created, bringing together a partnership of all 5 Area Agencies on Aging, all 5 Centers for Independent Living along with 3 AT Act partner agencies. Using a social isolation screening tool the AAAs and CILs screened individuals for social isolation and those who met the criteria were referred to the AT partners for AT consultation, recommendation of device(s) and training on the item(s) received. For the purchase of recommended devices, we were able to leverage CARES Act funding by tapping into multiple funding sources, including towns, private grants, Medicaid, National Family Caregiver Program funds and more. Individuals who did not meet the criteria were still provided with resources and other services by the AAAs and CILs.

2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.

Using a validated screening tool 748 individuals were screened and approximately 30% met the criteria for socially isolated. 293 individuals were referred for assistive technology services, which included a virtual consultation with an AT expert, recommendation of device(s), provision of device(s) by various funding sources, virtual set up and training on device(s). A range of technology was recommended from smart home devices like digital assistants, basic laptops and Chromebook, tablets or smart phones. Participants benefitted from the access to technology to participate in virtual community activities, virtual social activities with family and friends as well as access to telehealth. This often resulted in an improved quality of life and measurable reduction in social isolation. Lessons learned included the recognition that individuals benefit from the full range of AT services; funding for devices and AT services continues to be a challenging barrier; the tool used was too complex and unevenly implemented; we had difficulty reconnecting with individuals for post surveys; and there was not enough funding to serve everyone who was eligible. We had to turn away over 60 eligible individuals and screening halted once we knew there would not be sufficient funds to serve everyone. Things we would do differently include having one or two navigators or case managers to guide participants through the full process and ensure no one falls through the cracks but also help them apply for and follow up on funding; use a less complex screening tool; continue to search for additional funding to serve the unmet needs. We are currently trying to use lessons learned to streamline the process. The state AT Act program is working with CT's Department of Public Health on a new version of this program with one high burdened community to test the new process. Also using lessons learned to build a new, more sustainable process with same partners using ARPA funding. We continuing to look for ways to replicate the project if possible.

3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?

Community Participation and Integration; Recreation / Leisure; Health; Aging; Aging and Disability Network / No Wrong Door; Information and Communication Technology / Remote Connectivity;

4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?

Device Loan; Demonstration; Reuse; Information & Assistance; Public Awareness; Technical Assistance;

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 01

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.

Given the work described in the Section A. of Coordination / Collaboration Activities, the Stay Connected program resulted in a state improvement in that we have created a replicable program that is being used with the CT Department of Public Health and one high burdened community in CT. It is also being used to help establish a newer and better program to be used with ARPA funding and has also been used as a model to help establish similar technology programs related to employment within other parts of the state Department of Aging and Disability services including the state Vocational Rehabilitation agency and State Unit on Aging in partnership with the Workforce Alliance working on employment for seniors. Additionally, this program influenced written policy and practices for the National Family Caregiver Supplemental Program, allowing for the purchase of AT Services (consultation and training) along with the devices.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)

In the various iterations of the Stay Connected program, referral forms, flow charts and guidance have been created. For the National Family Caregiver Supplemental Program, policy and guidance have also been created and is being utilized.


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Community Living


Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
Federal$93,500Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$25,000TrainingTrue
Federal$20,000TrainingTrue
Federal$32,253DemonstrationTrue
Public/State Agency$45,764Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$59,444DemonstrationTrue
Federal$41,071Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Public/State Agency$10,800Technical AssistanceTrue
Federal$32,253Device LoanTrue
Private$30,000DemonstrationTrue
Private$20,000Device LoanTrue
Public/State Agency$49,700TrainingTrue
Public/State Agency$53,750Public Awareness, I&ATrue
Amount: $513,535

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


B. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 07 2022 11:01:54 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY21 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.