Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 45 | 05 | 50 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Rejected | 17 | 04 | 21 |
Total | 62 | 10 | 72 |
Lowest Income: | $13,644 | Highest Income: | $312,000 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$3,714,467 | 50 | $74,289 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 02 | 05 | 06 | 07 | 10 | 20 | 50 |
Percentage of Loans | 4% | 10% | 12% | 14% | 20% | 40% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 12 | 24% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 38 | 76% |
Total | 50 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 50 | $627,352 |
Total | 50 | $627,352 |
Lowest | 1% |
---|---|
Highest | 2% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
64 | 50 | 1.28% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 50 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 50 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $2,495 |
Hearing | 75 | $176,453 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 12 | $448,404 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 89 | $627,352 |
Number Loans in default | 00 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 0 |
---|
From Noah Zemke, who purchased a van through UATP’s financing “We actually found the van on KSL and the previous owner told us about UATP. “The van enables us to do a lot more coming and going as it’s less difficult on us and on Finn. He’s so much more comfortable being transported and his younger brother and sister both love helping open and close the lift. I think the van represents endless opportunities and potential for our family as Finn gets bigger. It helps us know we will be able to continue to live the active lifestyle we enjoy without having to exclude Finn in our activities.”
From Prakash Krishnamoorthy, who also purchased a van through UATP’s financing. He and his family were having a hard time getting out of the house. His son could not walk, and the boy was growing fast. “It’s not easy for me to lift him and put him in the van, and then dismantle the wheelchair and put it in the van,” he said. Over the past two years the Salt Lake area family found themselves staying home more and more. Caring for their boy took both parents’ attention. As they looked into purchasing a wheelchair-accessible van, they discovered what we hear from so many clients: the cost of the van’s modifications pushed the price well beyond its blue-book value. It made financing the purchase very difficult. Krishnamoorthy’s doctor told him about the Utah Assistive Technology Program’s financing options, and he gave UATP a call. UATP’s Lois Summers did more than help finance the purchase; she also helped the bank understand why the van cost so much more than the purchase price. UATP partners with Zions Bank on AT loans, and the company has been a great help in working with families who need assistive technology. Because UATP and Zions helped Krishnamoorthy get a reduced interest rate, it was possible for the family to afford more of the features they wanted. “The van is going to be with us for 10, 15 years,” Krishnamoorthy said. “We’ll need it always.” They found their van via an online site that connects buyers nationwide with available vans. It took some weeks for the van to be delivered, but once it arrived Krishnamoorthy took his son to their primary care doctor, and later on an outing to find a place where he could receive the COVID-19 vaccine. They also visited the IKEA store and went to a farmers' market that had animals and fun things to do. It was a chance for b
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 10 | 19 | 29 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 04 | 05 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 04 | 05 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 12 | 27 | 39 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 02 | 04 | 07 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 14 | 31 | 46 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 02 | 02 | 04 |
8. Total | 01 | 16 | 33 | 50 |
9. Performance on this measure | 0% | 75% | 81.82% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 50 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 50 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 21 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 474 |
C. Total | 495 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 495 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 13 | $2,600 | $40 | $2,560 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 11 | $27,225 | $780 | $26,445 |
Daily Living | 03 | $90 | $55 | $35 |
Environmental Adaptations | 04 | $2,300 | $280 | $2,020 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 02 | $7,000 | $400 | $6,600 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | $300 | $60 | $240 |
Total | 37 | $39,515 | $1,615 | $37,900 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 55 | $21,685 | $790 | $20,895 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 05 | $420 | $0 | $420 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 | $4,050 | $860 | $3,190 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 389 | $592,504 | $33,624 | $558,880 |
Daily Living | 42 | $8,170 | $285 | $7,885 |
Environmental Adaptations | 18 | $12,418 | $1,485 | $10,933 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 02 | $1,005 | $5 | $1,000 |
Computers and Related | 01 | $1,500 | $10 | $1,490 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 | $5,635 | $80 | $5,555 |
Total | 526 | $647,387 | $37,139 | $610,248 |
VERNAL--Alan Howell was a driving home to Vernal from Salt Lake City in January of 2020 when he was hit with a horrible headache. It was the first sign of a stroke of his spinal cord. After an ER visit, a hospitalization and a battery of tests, he returned home hearing he would never work again. He was 55 years old. “I found myself basically disabled overnight,” he said. Then he met Mindy Mair, a UATP client who told him that assistive technology could help. She put him in touch with the Utah Assistive Technology Program in Vernal. From there he met Cameron Cressall, the Uintah Basin coordinator. Cameron found a refurbished power chair for Alan. “If it wasn’t for that, my mobility would be zero,” Alan said. When Cameron learned that Alan lost his balance when he bent down to pick up things, Cameron found him a re-purposed grabber and a walker. “The equipment that he has suggested and provided has helped me greatly,” Alan said. ”If it wasn’t for Mindy and Cameron and their help and advice, I would still be struggling with all of this. "I’m still making the adjustment, my family’s still making the adjustment, but I don’t want to give up everything right now. Giving up independence is the worst.”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 04 | 118 | 125 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 03 | 59 | 67 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 06 | 134 | 145 |
4. Subtotal | 13 | 13 | 311 | 337 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 06 | 149 | 156 |
6. Subtotal | 14 | 19 | 460 | 493 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
8. Total | 14 | 19 | 462 | 495 |
9. Performance on this measure | 92.86% | 68.42% | 67.32% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 458 | 92.53% |
Satisfied | 18 | 3.64% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.61% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 16 | 3.23% |
Total Surveyed | 495 | |
Response rate % | 96.77% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 79 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 04 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 30 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 00 |
Total | 113 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Individuals with Disabilities | 55 | 23 | 78 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 14 | 10 | 24 |
Representative of Education | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 05 | 01 | 06 |
Representatives of Community Living | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 79 | 34 | 113 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 35 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices | ||
---|---|---|---|
Desicion-making | All other Purposes | Total | |
Vision | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Hearing | 02 | 00 | 02 |
Speech Communication | 01 | 02 | 03 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 51 | 36 | 87 |
Daily Living | 19 | 03 | 22 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Computers and Related | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 83 | 41 | 124 |
Aug 23-27: UATP loaned out equipment to assist with a Support Veterans Concert. The concert organizers requested wheelchairs to help concert-goers who might need them.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 11 | 02 | 59 | 72 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
Subtotal | 11 | 02 | 64 | 77 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 01 | 01 | 02 |
Subtotal | 11 | 03 | 65 | 79 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 11 | 03 | 65 | 79 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 66.67% | 98.46% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 06 | 05 | 17 | 28 |
4. Subtotal | 07 | 05 | 22 | 34 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 07 | 05 | 22 | 34 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 07 | 05 | 22 | 34 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 99 | 87.61% |
Satisfied | 13 | 11.5% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.88% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 113 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 62 |
Hearing | 06 |
Speech Communication | 47 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 106 |
Daily Living | 86 |
Environmental Adaptations | 34 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 08 |
Computers and Related | 18 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 389 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 389 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 152 |
Representatives of Education | 147 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 50 |
Representative of Community Living | 06 |
Representative of Technology | 35 |
Total | 779 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 21 |
Service Provider | 122 |
Vendor | 129 |
Repair Service | 04 |
Others | 11 |
Total | 287 |
Aug 2-6, 1. An OT working with a client referred them up to our demo library to try out the Level Liftware. The client loved it and is now applying for a UATF grant to purchase a set of her own.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 42 | 53 | 277 | 372 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 11 | 11 |
Subtotal | 42 | 53 | 288 | 383 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
Subtotal | 42 | 53 | 293 | 388 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 42 | 53 | 294 | 389 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 97.96% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 703 | 90.24% |
Satisfied | 64 | 8.22% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.26% |
Not at all satisfied | 05 | 0.64% |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 0.64% |
Total | 779 | |
Response rate % | 99.36% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 14 | 140 | 158 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 04 | 65 | 74 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 11 | 12 | 155 | 178 |
4. Subtotal | 20 | 30 | 360 | 410 |
5. None of the above | 02 | 08 | 153 | 163 |
6. Subtotal | 22 | 38 | 513 | 573 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 02 | 04 | 06 |
8. Total | 22 | 40 | 517 | 579 |
9. Performance on this measure | 40.91% | 45% | 39.65% | 40.07% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 53 | 55 | 336 | 444 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 16 | 16 |
Subtotal | 53 | 55 | 352 | 460 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 01 | 06 | 07 |
Subtotal | 53 | 56 | 358 | 467 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 53 | 56 | 359 | 468 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 98.21% | 98.05% | 98.29% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.22% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 98.54% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 515 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 33 |
Representatives of Education | 117 |
Representatives of Employment | 12 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 23 |
Representatives of Community Living | 67 |
Representatives of Technology | 04 |
Unable to Categorize | 08 |
TOTAL | 779 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
742 | 37 | 00 | 779 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 302 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 94 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 226 |
Transition | 157 |
Total | 779 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
SLC coordinator installed lights on a power wheelchair. The client is blind, so he needed training on the light switch and how it worked. He also provided training on different chair features and how they worked.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
As students prepare for interviews online, they need to be taught how to join zoom interviews and be comfortable using the app.(download, install, sign-in, features in zoom). Students had a school email address but not a personal email address. Creating a google account was the first step. Advanced topics included how to start a meeting, how to schedule a meeting, how to change the virtual background, how to change profile, how to add a photo, etc.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Training accessibility on iPad, smartphone (voiceover, zoom, text size, text to speech), and document accessibility were mostly requested (MS Word/PPT/PDF). Zoom training was a popular demand (creating a new email account, zoom account zoom features were covered during the training)
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 81 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 86 |
No known outcome at this time | 08 |
Nonrespondent | 51 |
Total | 226 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 73.9% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | % |
---|---|
Employment | 52% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 16% |
Community Living | 32% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | % |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The coordinator worked with an assisted living facility in the Ogden area to increase access to AT by training the professionals on available AT and setting up a standard method for placing trial devices with clients. He also trained the maintenance crew on how to perform relatively straightforward modifications to furniture PVC shower equipment so the maintenance crew could modify them by themselves instead of having for the next time he stops by.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Holiday Ad Campaign. UATP received an information grant to spread COVID awareness. We tied this messaging in with assistive technology to emphasize video conferencing apps that included captioning; games that could be played remotely; and other technologies that helped people connect and play with family. We shared this information though a series of radio ads, blog posts, newsletters and social media ads. This messaging reached an estimated 345,788 people, including Spanish speakers and people on the Navajo reservation.
2. UATP continued to produce eight podcasts, several of them during quarantine. These helped us not only spread awareness on AT but build relationships with our partners and the people with disabilities who shared their expertise with us. Our podcast received a total of 307 downloads during the 2020-21 fiscal year, and our hopes are to continue and expand this method of reaching listeners.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 450 | 00 | 450 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representative of Education | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representative of Employment | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Representative of Community Living | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 458 | 00 | 458 |
Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 1 |
---|
1. As concisely as possible, describe the partnership initiative. What activities/services were provided? Who are the major collaborating organizations and what is their role? Who is served/benefited? What funding was used to implement the initiative?
We partnered with Salt Lake County to educate underserved communities, such as individuals with disabilities, older adults, Asian, Native American, Pacific Islander, Latinx populations, about available resources in Utah during the pandemic. We have existing, established social media accounts, blog, podcast, newsletter, and long-term (30 years) partnerships with many multicultural, aging, and disability organizations statewide that can post and disseminate information through email, newsletters, bulletin boards, etc. Social media platforms include Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram. We have been effective in reaching underserved populations statewide for many years. The funding came from Salt Lake County to conduct outreach activities. Collaborating agencies in this project were Utah Development Disability Council, Disability Law Center, Utah Parent Center, Statewide Centers for Independent Living, Area Agencies on Aging, Senior Centers, Utah Pacific Islander Health Coalition.
2. As concisely as possible, describe the measurable results of the initiative and any lessons learned. How did access to AT change as a result of the coordination/collaboration/partnership? How did awareness of AT change as a result of the partnership? How did the reach of the state AT program change as a result of the partnership? What made the partnership successful? What would you change or wish you had done differently? Provided funding/resources are available, will the initiative continue or is this a one-time event? What advice would you give for replication of the initiative? Please include URL for initiative if available.
Most of the existing partnerships knew about the AT services. Minority communities often do not request our services, but we've spoken to many leaders in the minority organization and received more requests to obtain AT devices with our outreach effort. Our state is not hosting many in-person events at this time; we hope to spread the word to individuals rather than through leadership. This would help answer the individuals' questions and create personal relationships. This was a one-time (one year) project, but we hope to partner with the county to support more diverse residents in this area.
3. What focus areas(s) were addressed by the initiative?
Education; Housing / Home Automation; Health; Aging;
4. What AT Act authorized activity(s) were addressed?
Device Loan; Reuse; State Financing; Public Awareness;
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Data Reported |
---|---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $5,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $2,500 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $25,000 | Reuse | True |
Public/State Agency | $5,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
Public/State Agency | $5,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
State Appropriations | $2,500 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $30,000 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
Public/State Agency | $2,500 | Device Loan | True |
Public/State Agency | $15,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $25,000 | Training | True |
State Appropriations | $5,000 | Technical Assistance | True |
State Appropriations | $30,000 | Reuse | True |
State Appropriations | $7,500 | Public Awareness, I&A | True |
State Appropriations | $30,000 | Demonstration | True |
State Appropriations | $30,000 | State Financing | True |
Amount: $220,000 |
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 07 2022 11:17:00 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)