National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Puerto Rico 2021

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP)
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.pratp.upr.edu
Mailing Address:
Jardin Botanico Sur, 1187 Calle Flamboyan
City:
San Juan
State:
Puerto Rico
Zip Code:
00926
Program Email:
asistencia.tecnologica@upr.edu
Phone:
787-474-9999
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
University of Puerto Rico (UPR)
Mailing Address:
Jardin Botanico Sur, 1187 Calle Flamboyan
City:
San Juan
State:
Puerto Rico
Zip Code:
00926
Program URL:
www.pratp.upr.edu

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Hernandez, Maria M
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
787-474-7292
E-mail:
maria.hernandez17@upr.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Hernandez, Maria M
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
787-474-7292
E-mail:
maria.hernandez17@upr.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Hernandez, Maria M
Title:
Program Director
Phone:
787-474-7292
E-mail:
maria.hernandez17@upr.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?Telecommunications equipment distribution

2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)1
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)1
C. Total Served2

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures2

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 00.00
Hearing 00.00
Speech communication00.00
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00.00
Mobility, seating and positioning00.00
Daily living 2988.00
Environmental adaptations00.00
Vehicle modification and transportation 00.00
Computers and related 00.00
Recreation, sports, and leisure00.00
Total2988.00



C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 1
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity?AT Fabrication or AT Maker Program

2. Geographic Distribution and Number of Individuals Served

County of ResidenceIndividuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3)25
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9)4
C. Total Served29

Performance Measure
D. Excluded from Performance Measure0
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures29

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded

Type of AT Device / ServiceNumber ProvidedTotal Estimated
Current Retail
Purchase Price
Total Price for
Which Devices
Were Sold
Savings
to Consumers
Vision 000.000.00
Hearing 000.000.00
Speech communication 33900.00390.00
Learning, cognition, and developmental 000.000.00
Mobility, seating and positioning 31683.00165.00
Daily living 8127910.001269.00
Environmental adaptations 898833.00955.00
Vehicle modification and transportation 223738.002365.00
Computers and related 31859162.001697.00
Recreation, sports, and leisure 23489.00339.00
Total 297405225.007180.00


D. Anecdote

Gabriela (not her real name) is a very active and fiercely independent senior citizen with spinal chord injury (SCI). She uses a power chair and drives her van using adapted vehicle controls. However, her mobility was restricted by the fact that she could not operate the vehicle’s beeper remote independently due to the her limited hand control. She contacted the van’s dealer and the shop where the adaptive equipment is installed and she was amazed to find that, even for such an expensive adapted van, there was no remote control alternative other than the pocket sized regular beeper with the small inaccessible recessed buttons. She contacted PRATP looking for an alternative control system that she could use to access her van and, if possible, to also control her building’s automatic door opener which was also inaccessible to her. Through PRATP's AT fabrication initiative, an integrated radio-frequency (RF) control system was created. This adapted remote control had large buttons that where distributed and spaced according to Gabriela’s hand function and allowed her to control her buildings door opener and her van’s functions: lock/unlock, right/left door open/close, deploy/stow ramp and trunk open/close. The control was mounted on the armrest of Gabriela’s chair and she operates it with the side of her knuckle. Gabriela now feels completely independent as she can go in and out of her building and into her vehicle as she pleases.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 06 06
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 15 16
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 02 00 07 09
4. Subtotal 02 01 28 31
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 02 01 28 31
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 02 01 28 31
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 31 100%
Satisfied 00 0%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 31
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 07
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 196
C. Total 203

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 203

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 01 $750 $0 $750
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 09 $3,430 $0 $3,430
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 01 $450 $0 $450
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 11 $4,630 $0 $4,630

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 06 $9,477 $0 $9,477
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 16 $20,978 $0 $20,978
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 07 $3,460 $0 $3,460
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 195 $139,826 $0 $139,826
Daily Living 20 $6,478 $0 $6,478
Environmental Adaptations 05 $3,023 $0 $3,023
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 04 $896 $0 $896
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 02 $145 $0 $145
Total 255 $184,283 $0 $184,283

D. Anecdote

Jose (not his real name) is a 58-year-old man with limited mobility. His mother contacted PRATP to find alternatives for the acquisition of a power wheelchair that would allow Jose to move around independently. Due to the nature and severity of his condition, Jose needed a wheelchair that would address his particular characteristics and needs. However, the family could not afford such a device, so they requested PRATP’s help. An AT assessment on positioning and mobility was carried out to identify the necessary size and postural requirements for the needed wheelchair. Then, through PRATP’s Reuse Program, a suitable power wheelchair was identified, but it required some changes to match Jose’s needs. Size adjustments and postural modifications were made to the wheelchair to meet the characteristics identified during the assessment. Now, Jose has regained his mobility with a customized-reused power wheelchair that he and his family could not otherwise afford.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 01 122 127
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 20 20
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 10 00 40 50
4. Subtotal 14 01 182 197
5. None of the above 01 00 02 03
6. Subtotal 15 01 184 200
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 03 03
8. Total 15 01 187 203
9. Performance on this measure 93.33% 100% 97.33%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 183 90.15%
Satisfied 07 3.45%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 13 6.4%
Total Surveyed 203
Response rate % 93.6%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 25
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 00
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 13
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 08
Total 46

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS BY TYPE OF BORROWER
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Individuals with Disabilities 20 11 31
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 01 00 01
Representative of Education 01 06 07
Representative of Employment 00 00 00
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 02 02 04
Representatives of Community Living 01 02 03
Representatives of Technology 00 00 00
Total 25 21 46

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number of Devices
Desicion-making All other Purposes Total
Vision 01 02 03
Hearing 03 10 13
Speech Communication 13 05 18
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 02 01 03
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 06 10 16
Daily Living 06 10 16
Environmental Adaptations 01 00 01
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00 00 00
Computers and Related 00 00 00
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 02 02
Total 32 40 72

E. Anecdote

Fernando (not his real name) is an 8-year-old boy with a degenerative disorder that caused him to lose both speech and mobility. He can only perform slight movements of his head and, occasionally, one of his arms. Therefore, it is almost impossible for Fernando to call his mother when she is not in the same room, to control electronic devices, and to participate in play activities with his brother. Through PRATP’s AT loan program, Fernando was able to try out several AT devices, including a switch adapted bubble machine, a head-mounted switch, a USB switch interface for computer access and a switch adapted call alarm. It was very exciting to see how Fernando could activate the switch to interact with his family by calling his mother, blowing bubbles for his little brother to catch them and to access electronic games on his computer. The experience with the loaned equipment was invaluable for the family to decide that the AT devices were indeed an appropriate solution to augment Fernando’s capabilities in meaningful ways, including basic communication. Before the end of the loan period, PRATP helped the family select and acquire the appropriate devices for Fernando.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 06 02 15 23
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 06 02 16 24
Have not made a decision 01 00 00 01
Subtotal 07 02 16 25
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 07 02 16 25
Performance on this measure 85.71% 100% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 00 09 14
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 02 03
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 05 01 13 19
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 05 01 13 19
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
8. Total 06 01 14 21
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 41 89.13%
Satisfied 03 6.52%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 02 4.35%
Total Surveyed 46
Response rate % 95.65%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 03
Hearing 02
Speech Communication 30
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 09
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 05
Daily Living 05
Environmental Adaptations 03
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 03
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 60

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 45
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 44
Representatives of Education 01
Representatives of Employment 00
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 11
Representative of Community Living 01
Representative of Technology 00
Total 102

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 01
Service Provider 01
Vendor 11
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 13

D. Anecdote

Jorge (not his real name) is a 29-year-old man with quadriplegia due to a vehicle accident. Before the accident he worked as a mechanic for a local car distributor; however, with no movement from the neck down, he now spends most of his time in bed watching TV. Jorge’s family contacted PRATP after learning about it through the internet and social media. They were interested in learning about AT devices that would help Jorge find options to independently control his laptop and smartphone. Two demonstration services were set-up, one focusing in computer access and the other one on alternate controls for smartphone. During the demonstrations, Jorge had the opportunity to see, try-out and finally decide about the usefulness of an AT device to meet his needs. Several device options were presented, including eye tracking, head tracking, mouth controlled joystick, voice recognition and switch control, among others. He immediately selected head tracking as a viable alternative for computer access and a combination of Siri voice recognition and iOS voice control to access his iPhone. Jorge and her family were happy to learn about readily available tools that directly addressed Jorge’s needs for access and independence regarding electronic devices. They were particularly happy to learn that the access tools he liked most were available for free, since they had assumed that AT devices were quite expensive and probably out of their reach.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 27 03 26 56
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 27 03 27 57
Have not made a decision 00 00 01 01
Subtotal 27 03 28 58
Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
Total 28 03 29 60
Performance on this measure 96.43% 100% 93.1%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 84 82.35%
Satisfied 10 9.8%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 08 7.84%
Total 102
Response rate % 92.16%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 09 01 137 147
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 02 37 39
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 12 00 49 61
4. Subtotal 21 03 223 247
5. None of the above 01 00 02 03
6. Subtotal 22 03 225 250
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 04 05
8. Total 23 03 229 255
9. Performance on this measure 40.91% 100% 76.32% 73.52%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 33 05 41 79
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 02 02
Subtotal 33 05 43 81
Have not made a decision 01 00 01 02
Subtotal 34 05 44 83
Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
Total 35 05 45 85
Performance on this measure 94.29% 100% 95.56% 95.29%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 100% 95% Met
Response Rate 93.98% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 95
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 99
Representatives of Education 843
Representatives of Employment 94
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 189
Representatives of Community Living 560
Representatives of Technology 41
Unable to Categorize 04
TOTAL 1,925

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,870 49 06 1,925

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 1,400
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Combination of any/all of the above 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 299
Transition 226
Total 1,925

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

During FY 2021, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) provided the training “Assistive Technology Solutions in Emergency Situations” to 30 representatives of the Puerto Rico’s Core Advisory Groups (CAGs). In the aftermath of Hurricane María (2018), FEMA, and the Puerto Rico Emergency Management Bureau (PREMB) started the CAGs as a critical link to bridge the gap between emergency management efforts, individuals with disabilities and persons with access and functional needs. Since then, the CAGs have expanded their efforts Island-wide, changing the way emergency management is delivered in Puerto Rico, providing disability integration and awareness within all levels of the emergency management system. PRATP’s training focused on exploring assistive technology preparedness and response tools to address the particular needs of individuals with diverse disabilities before, during and after an emergency.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

As part of the training activities, and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, PRATP presented a training remote session on the topic of Assistive Technology as a tool in the Transition Process to support the Puerto Rico Family-to-Family Center (PR-F2FC). The PR-F2FC is a project of the Institute of Deficiencies in Development (IDD) of the Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico which its main objective is to offer support, information, resources in the community and the necessary tools for the family of children and young people with special health needs and / or intellectual and developmental disabilities. With a peer-to-peer approach, their staff are parents of children and youth with special health needs and / or intellectual and developmental disabilities who offer parent-to-parent support to all who seek their services. The main purpose of the training was to enable individuals with disabilities, their representatives, and others professionals, to increase knowledge, skills, and competencies around assistive technology (AT) and to help them make informed decisions about accessing and acquiring AT as part of planning the Transition process. A total of 106 participants were represented in the groups of education (44%), family members and people with disabilities (26%), representatives of health (18%), community life (6%) and representatives of technology 4%. The following objectives were covered: • Know the basic aspects of transition and what the services consist of • Define what is Assistive Technology • Offer an overview of local and federal laws that mandate the provision of AT equipment and services in the transition process. • Identify the importance of AT as part of the transition process for students with disabilities • Examine support tools, including AT as resources to facilitate and plan the course of the transition process As part of the final training, a question and answer session were held, as well as a discussion with providers, families, and individual that focused on the use of AT to support the transition process for their students with disabilities.

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, PRATP conducted a series of training sessions on PowerPoint best practices and tools to create accessible virtual and face-to-face presentations. Training was provided to professors and IT personnel from different campuses of the University of Puerto Rico and other universities throughout the Island as well. Accessible design and development aspects were discussed as well as guidelines for accessible presentation delivery, captioning, alt-text, and descriptive links, among other areas. Follow-up technical assistance was provided to participants who wanted to integrate accessibility into their courses, develop IT accessibility trainings or to modify university policies and practices regarding IT accessibility.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 177
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 38
No known outcome at this time 24
Nonrespondent 60
Total 299
Performance Measure Percentage 71.9%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 64%
Employment 1%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 2%
Community Living 23%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 10%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) provided technical assistance to the Puerto Rico Tribunal Administration Office (TAO, the Accessibility Program of the Judicial Branch, and the Court Improvement Program (Justice for Children Project) to create a Communication Board that would facilitate service provision to persons with disabilities in the Judicial Branch of Puerto Rico. First line service providers at the Judicial Branch participated in focus groups to identify barriers and critical incidents that limited the appropriate access to justice for individuals who have difficulty communicating. The results were used by PRATP’s AT Specialists to create a Communication Board that would help determine the best strategy for communicating with a person with disability or a non-Spanish or English speaker. As a result of this Technical Assistance, a portable two-sided communication board with a dry-erase writing area was created to be distributed Island-wide throughout the Judi

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Transition training activity reported.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. On September 2021, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) carried out an awareness campaign to promote its various services, particularly the Reuse initiative, and to request donations of gently used AT devices that could be reconditioned and provided to individuals with disabilities that could not otherwise access them. The campaign was promoted through social networks, radio, and the printed press. As a result, over 200 AT devices were received, covering the areas of positioning and mobility, learning and cognition, and communication., among others. The devices were promptly registered, refurbished, tested, and made available to persons with disabilities.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 243 03 246
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 405 05 410
Representative of Education 116 09 125
Representative of Employment 07 01 08
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 68 00 68
Representative of Community Living 91 04 95
Representative of Technology 03 00 03
Unable to Categorize 04 00 04
Total 937 22 959

Notes:

Coordination/Collaboration and State Improvement Outcomes

Overview of Coordination/Collaboration Activities

Coordination/Collaboration activities are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR coordination/collaboration activities for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 0

Overview of State Improvement Activities

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Data Reported
State Appropriations$30,000ReuseTrue
State Appropriations$45,000State FinancingTrue
State Appropriations$35,000Technical AssistanceTrue
Private$3,019State FinancingTrue
State Appropriations$50,000TrainingTrue
State Appropriations$40,000Device LoanTrue
State Appropriations$50,000Public Awareness, I&ATrue
State Appropriations$20,000DemonstrationTrue
Amount: $273,019

For any leveraged funding reported above for which data could not be reported, please describe the extenuating circumstances that precluded data from being reported and efforts to remediate the situation in future reporting periods.


B. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 07 2022 11:20:59 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY21 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.