Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 26 | 06 | 32 |
Approved Not made | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Rejected | 10 | 02 | 12 |
Total | 37 | 08 | 45 |
Lowest Income: | $8,892 | Highest Income: | $139,996 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$1,560,783 | 32 | $48,774 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 03 | 06 | 06 | 04 | 06 | 07 | 32 |
Percentage of Loans | 9.38% | 18.75% | 18.75% | 12.5% | 18.75% | 21.88% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 32 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 32 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 32 | $295,159 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 32 | $295,159 |
Lowest | 1% |
---|---|
Highest | 4% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
00 | 32 | 0% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 13 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 19 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 32 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $5,398 |
Hearing | 14 | $53,004 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 02 | $1,680 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 04 | $34,214 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 10 | $200,863 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 32 | $295,159 |
Number Loans in default | 03 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $7,145 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 02 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | last resort activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 10 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 05 |
C. Total Served | 15 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 15 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $0 |
Hearing | 03 | $2,475 |
Speech communication | 02 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 01 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 02 | $2,995 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 03 | $5,000 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 03 | $5,269 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $3,125 |
Total | 15 | $18,864 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: School Reimbursement Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 167 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 78 |
C. Total Served | 245 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 245 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 00 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Schools have obligation to provide AT under IDEA
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 57 | $186,367 |
Hearing | 35 | $50,086 |
Speech communication | 90 | $162,520 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 29 | $32,108 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 05 | $11,926 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 29 | $47,310 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 245 | $490,317 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
Fisher, a young man who attends school at the Shady Grove State School in Poplar Bluff, Missouri, is discovering the world of communication through his new NovaChat AAC device that was made possible through the ATR Program. Fisher was introduced to the device during an on-site consultation, and then was provided with a device through MoAT's device loan program. After the trial period was completed, Fisher received his own dedicated communication device through the ATR Program.
When an unfortunate accident left Tony without his adapted vehicle, he was able to turn to Missouri’s Show-Me Loans Program to get it replaced. Born without arms, Tony uses his feet for everything, including driving. A motivational speaker and foot-playing guitar player, being able to get back on the road has kept Tony traveling widely and continue to stay employed.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 47 | 47 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 47 | 47 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 47 | 47 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 47 | 47 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 286 | 97.95% |
Satisfied | 02 | 0.68% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 04 | 1.37% |
Total Surveyed | 292 | |
Response rate % | 98.63% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 1,666 |
C. Total | 1,666 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 1,666 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 35 | $14,514 | $100 | $14,414 |
Hearing | 17 | $2,349 | $175 | $2,174 |
Speech Communication | 08 | $23,735 | $0 | $23,735 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 05 | $1,496 | $0 | $1,496 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 1,181 | $309,471 | $15,292 | $294,179 |
Daily Living | 1,108 | $203,284 | $17,288 | $185,996 |
Environmental Adaptations | 30 | $4,101 | $0 | $4,101 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $35,000 | $8,000 | $27,000 |
Computers and Related | 07 | $1,546 | $0 | $1,546 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 2,392 | $595,496 | $40,855 | $554,641 |
Each year, Missourians save thousands of dollars by accessing one of MoAT’s device re-utilization centers across the state. Nico, who lives in Kansas City, was able to obtain a tilt in space power chair through his local re-utilization center. His wife noted that since he received the device, she has noticed a depression lift from Nico that he has struggled with since he first acquired his disability.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 09 | 830 | 841 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 05 | 01 | 667 | 673 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 01 | 55 | 57 |
4. Subtotal | 08 | 11 | 1,552 | 1,571 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 91 | 92 |
6. Subtotal | 08 | 12 | 1,643 | 1,663 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
8. Total | 08 | 12 | 1,646 | 1,666 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 91.67% | 94.29% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,394 | 83.67% |
Satisfied | 265 | 15.91% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.06% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.06% |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 0.3% |
Total Surveyed | 1,666 | |
Response rate % | 99.7% |
The sharp decrease in consumers served and items refurbished this year are directly tied to the pandemic. MoAT contracts with primarily IL Centers around the state to perform this service. Since mid-March, the majority of locations have either been closed for prolonged periods of time or have limited consumers entering their facilities. Furthermore, many consumers have greatly reduced their non-essential activities and have forgone seeking refurbished devices as a result.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 585 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 28 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 42 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 20 |
Total | 675 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 03 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 03 |
Representative of Education | 468 |
Representative of Employment | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 104 |
Representatives of Community Living | 68 |
Representatives of Technology | 29 |
Total | 675 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 35 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 164 |
Hearing | 72 |
Speech Communication | 716 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 274 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
Daily Living | 30 |
Environmental Adaptations | 148 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 16 |
Computers and Related | 421 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total | 1,841 |
Natalie's support team at the Orchard Farms School District in St. Charles, Missouri, was looking for ways to provide education support. She was struggling to keep up with her peers and participate in class. During an onsite consultation by MoAT, it was determined that Natalie's desire to be independent in the classroom and at lunch caused her difficulties in completing tasks in the time allotted. The time that it took her to independently feed herself kept her out of the classroom. The time it took Natalie to eat plus the time required for a clothes change after lunch would often take her away from her classwork. With the use of the OBI Robotic Feeding System, Natalie is independent at lunch, is able to socialize with her peers without an aid present, and is able to return to class on time.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 358 | 00 | 112 | 470 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 59 | 00 | 18 | 77 |
Subtotal | 417 | 00 | 130 | 547 |
Have not made a decision | 25 | 00 | 09 | 34 |
Subtotal | 442 | 00 | 139 | 581 |
Nonrespondent | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
Total | 445 | 00 | 140 | 585 |
Performance on this measure | 94.34% | NaN% | 93.53% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 38 | 00 | 34 | 72 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 12 | 00 | 05 | 17 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 50 | 00 | 39 | 89 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 50 | 00 | 39 | 89 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
8. Total | 51 | 00 | 39 | 90 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 641 | 94.96% |
Satisfied | 30 | 4.44% |
Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.59% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 675 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 266 |
Hearing | 384 |
Speech Communication | 60 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 18 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 299 |
Daily Living | 276 |
Environmental Adaptations | 15 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 55 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 12 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 1,385 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,258 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 421 |
Representatives of Education | 65 |
Representatives of Employment | 14 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 20 |
Representative of Community Living | 23 |
Representative of Technology | 04 |
Total | 1,805 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 164 |
Service Provider | 176 |
Vendor | 92 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 432 |
Carol was one of hundreds of Missourians statewide who visited a MoAT Demonstration Center to see, try and learn more about assistive technology. Like many visitors to the demonstration centers, Carol could not believe how many wonderful devices were out there that could help her live more independently. In her case, Carol was looking for a device that could help with the barriers she faced due to macular degeneration. During her visit at the Springfield demonstration location, she received guided exploration of an array of devices and eventually identified the one most appropriate for her.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 120 | 18 | 1,190 | 1,328 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 00 | 40 | 44 |
Subtotal | 124 | 18 | 1,230 | 1,372 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 12 | 13 |
Subtotal | 125 | 18 | 1,242 | 1,385 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 125 | 18 | 1,242 | 1,385 |
Performance on this measure | 99.2% | 100% | 99.03% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,182 | 65.48% |
Satisfied | 108 | 5.98% |
Satisfied somewhat | 15 | 0.83% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 500 | 27.7% |
Total | 1,805 | |
Response rate % | 72.3% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 40 | 09 | 911 | 960 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 17 | 01 | 672 | 690 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 01 | 55 | 57 |
4. Subtotal | 58 | 11 | 1,638 | 1,707 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 91 | 92 |
6. Subtotal | 58 | 12 | 1,729 | 1,799 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
8. Total | 59 | 12 | 1,732 | 1,803 |
9. Performance on this measure | 98.28% | 83.33% | 91.4% | 91.56% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 478 | 18 | 1,302 | 1,798 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 63 | 00 | 58 | 121 |
Subtotal | 541 | 18 | 1,360 | 1,919 |
Have not made a decision | 26 | 00 | 21 | 47 |
Subtotal | 567 | 18 | 1,381 | 1,966 |
Nonrespondent | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
Total | 570 | 18 | 1,382 | 1,970 |
Performance on this measure | 95.41% | 100% | 98.48% | 97.61% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.47% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 88.53% | 90% | Not Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 386 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 22 |
Representatives of Education | 495 |
Representatives of Employment | 85 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 167 |
Representatives of Community Living | 206 |
Representatives of Technology | 19 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,380 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
772 | 464 | 144 | 1,380 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 739 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 21 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 554 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 49 |
Transition | 17 |
Total | 1,380 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
A series of AT trainings conducted by Laura Hoffman, MoAT Program Coordinator were held virtually during the latter part of this federal year. This interactive training session had 144 attendees, primarily special educators, who were provided all necessary devices in advance of the training, thus encouraging their active participation during the event which covered an array of relevant topics including switch access/scanning, interfaces, alternative input, mounting, cause and effect apps, AAC apps and literacy apps. The intended impact was to prepare educators with new tools and solutions for students generally underserved by assistive technology in many Missouri schools.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
17 high school students with disabilities preparing to graduate were participants in a training covering the need to consider AT in their transition planning. Covered in the training was the initial version of a training guide that staff are preparing for students statewide.
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A strand each year at our Power Up Conference is devoted to Information and Communication Technology accessibility. Due to the conference's cancellation, we pivoted to doing on-line training events focused on specific aspects of ICT, such as Word Accessibility, etc.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 13 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 22 |
No known outcome at this time | 06 |
Nonrespondent | 08 |
Total | 49 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 71.4% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
The pandemic resulted in the cancellation of MoAT's largest training event each year, the Power Up Conference. This, combined with the cancellation/postponement of several other conferences staff were scheduled to participate in (i.e. DESE transition conference, 3 regional brain injury conferences, etc.) significantly impacted this year's overall training numbers.
Education | 40% |
---|---|
Employment | 20% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 40% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
The Missouri Department of Mental Health, Division of Developmental Disabilities sought out the guidance of Missouri Assistive Technology on the development of a pilot program to incorporate greater use of assistive technology by employment providers statewide. Related activities included working directly with employment providers on assessing the assistive technology needs of employees with developmental disabilities, investigating agency needs to increase assistive incorporation, training on various AT devices and apps and the initial work on an AT and Employment guide for employment providers.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
MoAT staff have been working with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to develop materials and training focused on the need to consider assistive technology as part of the post-high school transition process. In addition, MoAT continues to work with the state's Money Follows the Person Program on identifying and securing assistive devices and durable medical equipment for individuals transitioning from a nursing home to community living.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. A weekly e-news letter was launched this year which highlights AT devices (selection of which is based on frequently asked questions/device loan usage and/or themes), additions to AT loan library, educational videos and program updates. The newsletter is distributed widely to educators, agencies, consumers and other interested parties and averages around 655 opens per edition. New borrowers out of the loan program, new connections with current programs and greater awareness of AT options are among the noted outcomes of this activity.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,990 | 618 | 2,608 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 708 | 379 | 1,087 |
Representative of Education | 2,323 | 01 | 2,324 |
Representative of Employment | 82 | 07 | 89 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 669 | 22 | 691 |
Representative of Community Living | 2,454 | 31 | 2,485 |
Representative of Technology | 178 | 06 | 184 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 8,404 | 1,064 | 9,468 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $500,000 | State Financing |
Public/State Agency | $946,444 | Demonstration |
Public/State Agency | $20,000 | State Financing |
Amount: $1,466,444 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Thu Feb 04 2021 13:28:09 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)