Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 18 | 02 | 20 |
Approved Not made | 35 | 00 | 35 |
Rejected | 20 | 00 | 20 |
Total | 73 | 02 | 75 |
Lowest Income: | $15,252 | Highest Income: | $287,280 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$1,886,621 | 20 | $94,331 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 00 | 02 | 02 | 05 | 05 | 06 | 20 |
Percentage of Loans | 0% | 10% | 10% | 25% | 25% | 30% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 03 | 15% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 17 | 85% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 20 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 20 | $634,641 |
Total | 20 | $634,641 |
Lowest | 3% |
---|---|
Highest | 3% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
60 | 20 | 3% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 20 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 20 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 03 | $43,822 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 02 | $20,000 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 15 | $570,819 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 20 | $634,641 |
Number Loans in default | 02 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $3,614 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | telecommunications distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 71 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 00 |
C. Total Served | 71 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 71 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 28 | $11,443 |
Hearing | 38 | $14,755 |
Speech communication | 02 | $5,300 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 05 | $4,080 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $3,700 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 77 | $39,278 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | cooperative buying activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 127 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 09 |
C. Total Served | 136 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 68 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 68 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
School systems are required to purchase AT regardless of discounted AT purchases through the buying program
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price |
Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold |
Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 67 | $73,837 | $63,690 | $10,147 |
Hearing | 02 | $380 | $342 | $38 |
Speech communication | 1,732 | $292,796 | $256,409 | $36,387 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 312 | $39,248 | $34,179 | $5,069 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily living | 09 | $419 | $383 | $36 |
Environmental adaptations | 191 | $10,841 | $9,431 | $1,410 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 34 | $5,364 | $4,930 | $434 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 91 | $16,827 | $15,376 | $1,451 |
Total | 2,438 | $439,712 | $384,740 | $54,972 |
Staff from Assistive Technology Discount Sales and Services, Maryland's cooperative buying program, were attending a resource fair for a school in Baltimore City and met the aunt of one of the students. She was looking to purchase assistive technology for the student for the holidays and was exploring options for communication devices. After checking out a few items she found something she thought would work well. Staff suggested she confer with the student's teachers to make sure that the item would work well for the student and not conflict with other devices used in the classroom. After confirming it was a good match for the student she ordered the communication device and it was shipped in time for the holidays.
Mr. H, a team member of the University of Maryland Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Rugby team, applied to the Assistive Technology Financial Loan Program for a low interest loan to cover the balance of an adapted rugby wheelchair. Mr. H had already received a grant from the Challenged Athletes Foundation, and was seeking a loan for the difference. Working with ATLP staff, he was approved for a non-guaranteed loan at a preferred interest rate. Mr. H was ecstatic and has been able to use his rugby wheelchair to continue participating in team sports.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 13 | 25 | 113 | 151 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 06 | 07 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 14 | 25 | 120 | 159 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 14 | 25 | 120 | 159 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 14 | 25 | 120 | 159 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 203 | 89.43% |
Satisfied | 24 | 10.57% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 227 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Maryland's low interest financial loan program, the ATLP, experienced a sharp decline in approved applications between FY19 and FY20. In an effort to preserve the loan fund as it has not generated new funds since 2007, the program implemented lowered loan limits, reducing the number of applications received for adapted vehicles (typically the largest portion of the loan program portfolio). In addition, as COVID established itself as a national pandemic starting in March of 2020, the ATLP experienced a sharp decline in loans as many people faced economic insecurity, effectively reducing loan requests for the second half of the federal fiscal year.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 79 |
C. Total | 79 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 79 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $2,200 | $0 | $2,200 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $16,000 | $0 | $16,000 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 05 | $800 | $0 | $800 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 88 | $93,540 | $0 | $93,540 |
Daily Living | 19 | $4,835 | $0 | $4,835 |
Environmental Adaptations | 03 | $798 | $0 | $798 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 118 | $118,173 | $0 | $118,173 |
Ms. D contacted the MD Assistive Technology Program to identify a more suitable manual wheelchair as her multiple sclerosis had progressed and her current wheelchair required more physical strength than she had. Additionally, Ms. D is very petite and the chair she was provided through insurance was too large and unwieldy. MDTAP's reuse staff was able to locate a smaller manual wheelchair, which Ms. D received in August 2020. She generously donated her former chair to the program for another person in need.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 61 | 62 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 11 | 11 |
4. Subtotal | 02 | 00 | 74 | 76 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 02 | 00 | 77 | 79 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 02 | 00 | 77 | 79 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | NaN% | 96.1% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 78 | 98.73% |
Satisfied | 01 | 1.27% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 79 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
During FY20, the Maryland AT program's device exchange Facebook page experienced reduced identifiable exchanges, largely due to the COVID19 pandemic. However, the program was able to continue its other equipment reuse activities, and launched its High-tech AT Reuse Center in January 2020. Although the data numbers in this area reflect a decrease due to the pandemic and obvious concerns around transmittable viruses on reused equipment, the program anticipates a more level reuse numbers in FY21.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 67 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 08 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 04 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 04 |
Total | 83 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 45 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 16 |
Representative of Education | 06 |
Representative of Employment | 03 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 04 |
Representatives of Community Living | 07 |
Representatives of Technology | 02 |
Total | 83 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 32 |
Hearing | 13 |
Speech Communication | 44 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 05 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
Daily Living | 07 |
Environmental Adaptations | 09 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 06 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 |
Total | 120 |
We have expanded some of our services in regards to device loans assisting clients stay engaged in school, day programs, etc. staff set up a consultation with TE, the coordinator of community service at MMARS, in regards to his client ES. His request was to assist ES with staying engaged with his day program services during COVID-19 which were now virtual. After discussion, we found that one of our iPads with Zoom installed on it would work perfectly for ES to continue to participate in his day program. We loaned the iPad to ES for an extended loan of 2-months in order to adapt to the new virtual world and make other arrangements in the meantime to find a device that ES could use. This was meaningful to our client because he was able to continue to connect with his therapy sessions and day program meetings and activities virtually to improve his quality of life and reduce feelings of isolation during these trying times.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 14 | 07 | 26 | 47 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 00 | 12 | 16 |
Subtotal | 18 | 07 | 38 | 63 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
Subtotal | 18 | 07 | 42 | 67 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 18 | 07 | 42 | 67 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 90.48% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 08 | 09 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 00 | 03 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 11 | 13 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 13 | 15 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
8. Total | 01 | 01 | 14 | 16 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 84.62% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 76 | 91.57% |
Satisfied | 03 | 3.61% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 02 | 2.41% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 2.41% |
Total Surveyed | 83 | |
Response rate % | 97.59% |
The number of device loans was significantly reduced in FY20 because of COVID-19. With the outset of the virus in March, MDTAP and its regional contractors stopped all device loans until May, at which time we began loaning only items related to COVID needs. In July, we resumed regular device loans with extensive sanitation protocols in place, and adjusted the loan process by shipping out devices one day a week, and receiving devices back on a limited, scheduled system. Because of these limitations, the number of device loans were drastically reduced. However, we are hopeful that in FY21 we will resume more level activity around device loans.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 20 |
Hearing | 03 |
Speech Communication | 05 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 02 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
Daily Living | 03 |
Environmental Adaptations | 04 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 04 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 42 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 31 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 16 |
Representatives of Education | 05 |
Representatives of Employment | 02 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 08 |
Representative of Community Living | 04 |
Representative of Technology | 01 |
Total | 67 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 05 |
Service Provider | 02 |
Vendor | 05 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 12 |
During COVID virtual services, MDTAP worked with Mr. S, who had experienced a traumatic brain injury and had lost functional use of his dominant (right) upper extremity and was requesting a demo of different devices to assist with self-feeding to compensate for his reduced ability to move his right upper extremity and to potentially begin using his left upper extremity to begin self-feeding. Mr. S was accompanied by his independent living counselor, KH, and the social worker who had been working on his case, P, to see the demonstrations and assist Mr. S in making a decision. MDTAP staff demonstrated to Mr. S , and his support staff, a few different adaptive feeding devices including a universal cuff you could attach a utensil to, the Liftware Level, Dining with Dignity utensils, among a couple of other adaptive silverware devices. After showing each device and opening the floor to discussion we all agreed that the Liftware Level would be an appropriate device to trial for effectiveness. We were able to successfully send the loan form back and forth via email and move forward with the loan, which was shipped via USPS to the client. The client was able to try this feeding AT and determine what would work best.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 03 | 00 | 26 | 29 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
Subtotal | 03 | 00 | 30 | 33 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 03 | 05 | 09 |
Subtotal | 04 | 03 | 35 | 42 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 04 | 03 | 35 | 42 |
Performance on this measure | 75% | 0% | 85.71% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 63 | 94.03% |
Satisfied | 02 | 2.99% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 2.99% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 67 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
As a recurring data theme this year, MDTAP experienced a reduction in device demonstrations because of the COVID-19 pandemic. As MDTAP worked to convert its services to a virtual platform, and support our regional contractors in this process, we were unable to maintain a level of device demonstrations that had been consistent for our program previously. MDTAP and our regions have now converted to virtual demonstrations, with extremely limited in-person demonstrations (on a case-by-case basis). We anticipate that for FY21, our numbers of device demonstrations will start to return to more consistent level with previous years.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 14 | 26 | 182 | 222 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 11 | 14 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 12 | 12 |
4. Subtotal | 17 | 26 | 205 | 248 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
6. Subtotal | 17 | 26 | 210 | 253 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
8. Total | 17 | 26 | 211 | 254 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 91.9% | 93.28% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 17 | 07 | 52 | 76 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 04 | 00 | 16 | 20 |
Subtotal | 21 | 07 | 68 | 96 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 03 | 09 | 13 |
Subtotal | 22 | 10 | 77 | 109 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 22 | 10 | 77 | 109 |
Performance on this measure | 95.45% | 70% | 88.31% | 88.07% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Not Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.12% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 99.56% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 11 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 03 |
Representatives of Education | 123 |
Representatives of Employment | 103 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 60 |
Representatives of Community Living | 06 |
Representatives of Technology | 26 |
Unable to Categorize | 21 |
TOTAL | 353 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
323 | 11 | 19 | 353 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 10 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 221 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 122 |
Transition | 00 |
Total | 353 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
On 11/6/19 MDTAP staff trained ADA Coordinators for the Maryland Court system on using assistive technology in the courtroom. This included discussing what was already in the courts and the availability of device loans from MDTAP for other items. The intended impact is that lawyers and other court staff will be able to help meet the needs of jurors and witnesses with AT needs.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
ICT staff worked with the Governor's Office of Maryland to provide training to communications staff on how to create accessible Executive Orders (EOs). ICT staff was first approached in March 2020 to support accessibility needs when the Governor began releasing multiple Executive Orders in response to the COVID 19 pandemic. As ICT staff worked to remediate these orders, they also worked with the office to identify key communications staff that would be trained to handle the remediation's going forward. The initial training was provided April 7th, and focused on using Adobe Acrobat DC specifically to make executive orders accessible through manual and automated remediation procedures. A follow up training has been scheduled for new staff in the Governor's Office. As a long-term solution to this issue, the Governor's Office has identified the need to create screen reader friendly versions to exist in addition to, not to replace, the original executive orders, because the Executive Orders are nearly always are posted online at a moment's notice. Staff has also discussed and will confer with ICT staff on how to house the accessible EOs on the Governor's website in a way that is easy for users to find.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 58 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 36 |
No known outcome at this time | 25 |
Nonrespondent | 03 |
Total | 122 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 77% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 16.92% |
---|---|
Employment | 0% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 33.85% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 49.23% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
MDTAP supported the MD State Arts Council in their development of an accessibility policy to ensure physical and digital access to events they run, events they support through grants, and to the artists that are supported through their initiatives. This work will including serving as advisor on the development of their policies, their notification forms for inaccessible events, and providing direct resources to their team on funding, remediation, and modifications. Staff participated in multiple planning sessions, resulting in a comprehensive accessibility guide and development of ADA compliant policies around ensuring access to services both in-person and virtually. MDTAP also provided guidance on a wide range of assistive technology that can be incorporated into events to increase access and meet ADA compliance.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
MDTAP worked closely with the Maryland Department of Aging and the Centers for Independent Living (CILs) to facilitate cross collaboration as it related to CARES Act funding for technology. MDTAP staff, with additional support from the MD Department of Disabilities, pulled together planning meetings so that all the agencies could collaborate on how CARES Act funding would be allocated to Marylanders without duplication of services or efforts. Through bi-weekly and then monthly planning calls, the programs identified a system in which the Department of Aging would purchase technology for seniors in the community in need of equipment to reduce social isolation and attend doctor's appointments; the CILs would purchase the equipment for consumers in nursing facilities seeking to transition out and stay connected with family and providers; MDTAP would provide AT consultation to both agencies and device loans to all consumers waiting for equipment through either the CIL or MDoA.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. After Maryland shifted to remote work and learning, especially in the area of developmental disability services, MDTAP Was invited to present a session on AT supports during the Developmental Disability Administrations weekly provider resource webinar, hosted on June 12, 2020. MDTAP's ED hosted a 45 minute presentation and discussion with DDA leadership and DDA providers, families, and individual clients. The session was attended by 618 people across Maryland and the focus included using AT to support remote services, reduce social isolation, and continue engaging in needed medical and provider appointments.
2. On January 21, 2020, MDTAP's Executive Director provided an AT presentation and MDTAP overview to the Maryland Civil Rights Commission. This was in honor of the 30th anniversary of the ADA and included a discussion of the impact of AT in equalizing access for people with disabilities, a brief history of the movement of assistive technology, and an overview of AT services in Maryland currently. Approximately 15 people attended in person.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 264 | 20 | 284 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 48 | 13 | 61 |
Representative of Education | 88 | 133 | 221 |
Representative of Employment | 10 | 32 | 42 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 37 | 03 | 40 |
Representative of Community Living | 50 | 15 | 65 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 498 | 216 | 714 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 01 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
MDTAP IT Accessibility Initiative staff has been working with the Department of Information Technology (DoIT) and the Department of General Services (DGS) to redefine the process for including accessibility and compliance with Maryland's Non Visual Access Standards (NVA) in the procurement of information technology in state agencies. This is a two-pronged approach in Maryland, as DoIT handles all agency IT requests initially while DGS handles all requests for proposals (RFPs) for information technology.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
Because of this work related to building accessibility into the procurement process, DoIT has created an internal "plan-of-action" to ensure that all IT requests are measured against Maryland's Non Visual Access Standards to ensure compliance with accessibility. This will ensure that when DoIT fits an enterprise procurement to an agency's IT need, DoIT will confirm that the solution is compliant with NVA standards. Furthermore, MDTAP created the Maryland Procurement Academy training, which will be mandated for all DGS procurement officers, to ensure that when an IT request goes out to bid, the request for proposal (RFP) includes standard NVA language and the bidder includes multi-modes of verification to ensure their product complies with NVA accessibility standards. Although neither of these processes are public, we can share the DoIT Plan of Action and the MD Procurement Academy Training upon request.
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Technology (ICT accessibility and AT
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $36,711 | State Financing |
Amount: $36,711 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Thu Feb 04 2021 13:26:50 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)