Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 09 | 01 | 10 |
Approved Not made | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Rejected | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 14 | 01 | 15 |
Lowest Income: | $8,652 | Highest Income: | $96,677 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$398,440 | 10 | $39,844 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 04 | 02 | 01 | 00 | 00 | 03 | 10 |
Percentage of Loans | 40% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 30% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 10 | 100% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 10 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 10 | $36,604 |
Total | 10 | $36,604 |
Lowest | 4.5% |
---|---|
Highest | 4.5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
45 | 10 | 4.5% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 10 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 10 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 05 | $23,018 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 01 | $189 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 04 | $8,047 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 02 | $5,350 |
Total | 12 | $36,604 |
Number Loans in default | 04 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $6,776 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
Jeff was referred by a local mobility company. He is 43 and has a severe Spinal Stenosis that affects his ability to ambulate long distances. Jeff needed a vehicle lift in order to transport his power scooter with him into the community. Jeff is married, has a young son and his wife had recently lost her job due to COVID-19. The family was living solely on his disability income. At referral Jeff presented to our program coordinator with a depressed demeanor. He was skeptical about the program asking in a doubtful tone “how easy it is to get a loan?”. It took some encouraging for him to pursue the program. Our coordinator reminded him that it didn’t cost anything to apply and that he did not have anything to lose. Jeff applied for a loan in the amount $2702.09 for a lift for his vehicle. He had a low credit score; a tight monthly budget and he was making monthly payments on a high interest title loan on one of his vehicles. The rep from our lending partner, Marisol Federal Credit Union who sits on our loan review committee relayed they could help Jeff with the high interest Title Loan. If he would put the vehicle up as collateral they could refinance this loan at a shorter term and save him about $220.00 month. Jeff in turn would then be able to use this savings to make the monthly AzLAT loan payment on the scooter lift. The AzLAT loan review committee tentatively approved his loan in the amount of $2702.09 loan for a term of 18 months contingent on these terms. Jeff agreed to this plan and stated, "I'll be paying less a month with these two loans than I did with the one." Jeff thanked our program coordinator over and over and he sounded more cheerful and hopeful. Once the AzLAT loan was funded Jeff was able to obtain his vehicle lift.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 10 | 10 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 10 | 10 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 10 | 10 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 09 | 90% |
Satisfied | 01 | 10% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 10 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 12 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 12 |
C. Total | 24 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 24 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 01 | $1,948 | $0 | $1,948 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | $107 | $0 | $107 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 06 | $2,737 | $900 | $1,837 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $2,500 | $150 | $2,350 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $460 | $0 | $460 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 | $4,500 | $1,000 | $3,500 |
Total | 12 | $12,252 | $2,050 | $10,202 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 12 | $2,837 | $2,128 | $709 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 12 | $2,837 | $2,128 | $709 |
Betty was looking for a TheraCycle 200 Forced Exercise Bike for her brother with a disability. The TheraCycle 200 is a motorized bike that moves the arms and pedals the legs even if the person is unable to manually push/pull or pedal. When she “‘Googled” the name of the bike she found the link to one that we had advertised on our AT Exchange site. She contacted our Reuse Coordinator and was guided through the process of registering for account on the AT Exchange site so she could be logged as an inquirer and get the contact information for the seller. The original MSRP of the bike was $4,500. Betty ended up purchasing it from the seller on our site for $1,000. We followed with her after the purchase and Betty stated she couldn’t be more pleased. The sale went smooth, the bike is in excellent condition, her brother uses it every day and she saved $3,500.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 20 | 21 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 01 | 22 | 23 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 02 | 22 | 24 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 02 | 22 | 24 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 50% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 17 | 70.83% |
Satisfied | 07 | 29.17% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 24 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Our AT Exchange and Refurbishment activities were significantly reduced this year by three events: 1) The promotion of a part-time staff member who was doing the vast majority of our refurbishing activities to a full time position. 2) The cancelation of our in person conference due to COVID-19. We generally are able to market a wide variety of Reuse devices to participants at this conference. 3) The promotion of one of our ATS's to the AzTAP Program Director position. When we have hired a new ATS and and after COVID-19 when we are able to return to regular client services we are hoping to secure a volunteer to assist us with our device refurbishment activities and increase our numbers.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 494 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 54 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 26 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 49 |
Total | 623 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 517 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 04 |
Representative of Education | 26 |
Representative of Employment | 01 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 55 |
Representatives of Community Living | 06 |
Representatives of Technology | 14 |
Total | 623 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 14 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 112 |
Hearing | 134 |
Speech Communication | 324 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 301 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 67 |
Daily Living | 341 |
Environmental Adaptations | 274 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 01 |
Computers and Related | 329 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 84 |
Total | 1,967 |
A parent called asking AzTAP if we could help her out with a loaner iPad. She relayed that her 6 year daughter has a developmental disability and difficulty with speech. Her iPad was broken and it had been sent back to our state DDD organization for repair/replacement. On the iPad she had the TouchChat communication App with an extensive customized vocabulary. Mom did not know how to transfer her daughters customized vocabulary to a borrowed device. AzTAP was able to provide the family with a loaner iPad, the same voice the child had been using on her device as well as with in person technical support for Mom with transferring the backup of her daughter’s custom vocabulary to the borrowed device. The family was very pleased that their daughter could continue communicating with a familiar device.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 150 | 18 | 129 | 297 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 59 | 11 | 53 | 123 |
Subtotal | 209 | 29 | 182 | 420 |
Have not made a decision | 11 | 02 | 09 | 22 |
Subtotal | 220 | 31 | 191 | 442 |
Nonrespondent | 24 | 03 | 25 | 52 |
Total | 244 | 34 | 216 | 494 |
Performance on this measure | 95% | 93.55% | 95.29% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 01 | 00 | 05 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 28 | 15 | 31 | 74 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 32 | 16 | 33 | 81 |
5. None of the above | 04 | 00 | 01 | 05 |
6. Subtotal | 36 | 16 | 34 | 86 |
7. Nonrespondent | 35 | 00 | 08 | 43 |
8. Total | 71 | 16 | 42 | 129 |
9. Performance on this measure | 64% | 100% | 97.06% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 499 | 80.1% |
Satisfied | 67 | 10.75% |
Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 0.8% |
Not at all satisfied | 03 | 0.48% |
Nonrespondent | 49 | 7.87% |
Total Surveyed | 623 | |
Response rate % | 92.13% |
The AzTAP general equipment loan program continued uninterrupted through COVID-19. Our ADE equipment loan program however due to COVID-19 saw a sharp decline in the number of loans due the closure of schools and the transition to online learning. As a result our overall number of devices loaned has been substantially reduced over last years total.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 18 |
Hearing | 07 |
Speech Communication | 136 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 10 |
Daily Living | 10 |
Environmental Adaptations | 10 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 17 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 210 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 209 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 267 |
Representatives of Education | 03 |
Representatives of Employment | 04 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 34 |
Representative of Community Living | 07 |
Representative of Technology | 04 |
Total | 528 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
Service Provider | 00 |
Vendor | 12 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 12 |
A family with a 12 year old son contacted AzTAP. Their son, Jimmy had Dyslexia and be was being homeschooled because his parents felt he had fallen behind. The families presenting goals were to get him caught up academically, find some AT to assist him with reading and to get him back to school so he could be with his friends. They had heard about and Jimmy had tried the OrCam My Eye 2. They had held off on purchasing this device, because the OrCam Read was coming out in the Spring of 2020 and they wanted to try that device since it was designed for persons with Dyslexia and is about 1/3rd the price. Once the device came out and was available AzTAP added it to our inventory. Due to COVID-19 the family had a virtual demonstration of it with the AzTAP ATS and the product representative. They opted to borrow the device via our equipment loan program so that Jimmy could try it out at home. Ultimately, Jimmy chose to go with the OrCam My Eye 2 becuase he liked how it attached to his glasses so that he would not have to carry something around. The family purchased the OrCam My Eye 2 for Jimmy.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 04 | 10 | 174 | 188 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 01 | 15 | 16 |
Subtotal | 04 | 11 | 189 | 204 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 04 | 11 | 189 | 204 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 02 | 04 | 06 |
Total | 04 | 13 | 193 | 210 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 84.62% | 97.93% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 516 | 97.73% |
Satisfied | 12 | 2.27% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 528 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Due to COVID-19 AzTAP experienced a significant decline from last year device demonstration services. Since March 2020 our number of demonstration referrals has declined significantly. When possible and appropriate virtual demonstration services were offered and encouraged but they were not often not accepted. Internal issues with a contracted funding source also impacted our device demonstration numbers this year.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 01 | 08 | 13 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 28 | 16 | 55 | 99 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 32 | 17 | 65 | 114 |
5. None of the above | 04 | 01 | 01 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 36 | 18 | 66 | 120 |
7. Nonrespondent | 35 | 00 | 08 | 43 |
8. Total | 71 | 18 | 74 | 163 |
9. Performance on this measure | 69.57% | 94.44% | 95.45% | 86.15% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 154 | 28 | 303 | 485 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 59 | 12 | 68 | 139 |
Subtotal | 213 | 40 | 371 | 624 |
Have not made a decision | 11 | 02 | 09 | 22 |
Subtotal | 224 | 42 | 380 | 646 |
Nonrespondent | 24 | 05 | 29 | 58 |
Total | 248 | 47 | 409 | 704 |
Performance on this measure | 95.09% | 90.91% | 96.61% | 95.71% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.30% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 95.86% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 54 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 33 |
Representatives of Education | 485 |
Representatives of Employment | 292 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 395 |
Representatives of Community Living | 230 |
Representatives of Technology | 187 |
Unable to Categorize | 212 |
TOTAL | 1,888 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,637 | 204 | 47 | 1,888 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,166 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 02 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 383 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 08 |
Transition | 329 |
Total | 1,888 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
AzTAP was asked to provide a training for a local private school that incorporates learning about persons with disabilities and their needs into its curriculum starting in the 1st grade. They teach them about different disabilities and then have a guest speaker to discuss what it is like for them living with their disability. When they get to second grade, they learn what AT is and how it can assist a person with a disability. AzTAP & our Department of Education (ADE) program staff came together to run this training. We divided the group of fifty five second grade children into three groups. We first discussed with each group how someone with a disability may do an activity and they provided us with ideas and all sorts of possibilities. We then set up stations of AT devices from the following categories; hearing, vision, computers, speech, daily living and games/sports. We reviewed each one of the AT devices with each group and how a person with a disability could use each item. Everyone, including the teachers and the aids asked several questions about the devices. There were a few second graders that even came up with future AT possibilities to help individuals with disabilities.
Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Due to COVID-19 our full annual assistive technology conference was modified to a smaller virtual format this year. As part of that event AzTAP and our Department of Education partner hosted the following workshop “Pump the Brakes: Merging Assistive Technology & Transition Planning”. This workshop focused on strategies to support students with high incidence disabilities in understanding and prioritizing their post-secondary AT needs. Participants were able to discover or refine strategies that will prepare them with identifying appropriate AT and ways to support the instruction of the use of the tool (s) within the transition planning process. Hypothetical examples of AT will be presented, and connections will be made to the various post-secondary environments (employment, education/training, and independent living).
Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
Due to COVID-19 our full annual assistive technology conference was modified to a smaller virtual format this year. As part of that event AzTAP and an Accessibility Analyst with our parent organization hosted the following workshop “ Demystifying Web Accessibility”. The workshops main focus was on taking some of the mystery or unknowns out of website accessibility. Workshop participants learned how accessibility and usability relate and if you follow universal design practices and have a good foundation that better accessibility is an attainable result. Specific information was provided on the four foundational principles of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), the requirement for Public Education Agency (PEA’s) to provide accessible instructional materials on their website as well as the importance of “hands on testing” instead of automated accessibility testing. Workshop participants received a resource list to help them get started on the right track.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 03 |
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented | 05 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 08 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Under COVID-19 AzTAP has shifted our training services when possible to a virtual format. We will continue to do this until we can return to in person training services.
Education | 0% |
---|---|
Employment | 100% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 0% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
AzTAP was contacted by a staff member with a training services provider that provides training for Forestry Department and other government employees. They had a situation with an employee who was Deaf that worked in a rural environment. They were having a hard time finding/getting reliable ASL interpreter services for her. Unfortunately, they did not have reliable cellular or Wi-Fi coverage in the area for remote interpreting style services. Our customer was needing suggestions on AT options that their organization could explore to better accommodate her auditory communication needs in a variety of settings. Our ATS explored low and mid tech options/strategies with the organization that did not require a connection to operate such as the employee self ID’ing to with an “I’m Deaf” button; a Boogie Board and iPad/iPhone iOS AAC ASL/English interpretation, writing and typing to text iOS Apps.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
AzTAP did not have a Technical Assistance project request that was related to transition.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. AzTAP staff was asked to do an overview presentation on our programs and services for the city of Phoenix Mayor's Commission on Disability Issues. Normally, this presentation would be done in person at one of their monthly meetings; but, due to COVID-19 we provided it virtually via Zoom. A fully accessible PowerPoint was prepared and provided to the Commission and their participants. During the Zoom presentation we reviewed the salient features of each our services for device demonstration, equipment loan (both AzTAP and ADE programs), our Reuse services, alternative financing program, training program as well as technical assistance. We were also able to give an overview of how COVID-19 was impacting the delivery of each activity and relay that our current COVID-19 operational plan was available on the homepage of our website. At the conclusion of the presentation we took questions about our program services as well as AT needs in general. Participants were provided with AzTAP's contact information as well as how to make referrals.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 410 | 267 | 677 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 313 | 291 | 604 |
Representative of Education | 196 | 18 | 214 |
Representative of Employment | 27 | 00 | 27 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 325 | 36 | 361 |
Representative of Community Living | 93 | 17 | 110 |
Representative of Technology | 31 | 06 | 37 |
Unable to Categorize | 34 | 02 | 36 |
Total | 1,429 | 637 | 2,066 |
Due to COVID-19 AzTAP experienced a significant decline in the number of I & A contacts over last year.
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $178,284 | Device Loan |
Public/State Agency | $30,000 | Training |
Federal | $317,594 | Demonstration |
Amount: $525,878 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Revenues were down this year from the demonstration funding source due to internal issues and the effects of COVID-19 on the program.
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Thu Feb 04 2021 13:16:44 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)