National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Arizona 2020

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Arizona Technology Access Program (AzTAP)
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
http://aztap.org
Mailing Address:
300 West Clarendon Ave, Suite 475
City:
PHOENIX
State:
Arizona
Zip Code:
85013
Program Email:
askaztap@nau.edu
Phone:
602-728-9534
TTY:
602-728-9536

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Northern Arizona University-Institute for Human Development
Mailing Address:
Box 4130
City:
Flagstaff
State:
Arizona
Zip Code:
86011
Program URL:
www.nau.edu

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Clayton Guffey
Title:
AzTAP Program Director
Phone:
602-776-4699
E-mail:
Clayton.Guffey@nau.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Clayton Guffey
Title:
AzTAP Program Director
Phone:
602-776-4699
E-mail:
Clayton.Guffey@nau.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Lawrence, Kerwin
Title:
Assistant Director Office of Sponsored Projects
Phone:
928-523-8585
E-mail:
kerwin.lawrence@nau.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 09 01 10
Approved Not made 01 00 01
Rejected 04 00 04
Total 14 01 15

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $8,652 Highest Income: $96,677

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$398,440 10 $39,844

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 04 02 01 00 00 03 10
Percentage of Loans 40% 20% 10% 0% 0% 30% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 10 100%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 10 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 10 $36,604
Total 10 $36,604

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 4.5%
Highest 4.5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
45 10 4.5%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 10
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 10

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 00 $0
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 05 $23,018
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 01 $189
Vehicle modification and transportation 04 $8,047
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 02 $5,350
Total 12 $36,604

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 04
Net loss for loans in default $6,776

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 00


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

Jeff was referred by a local mobility company. He is 43 and has a severe Spinal Stenosis that affects his ability to ambulate long distances. Jeff needed a vehicle lift in order to transport his power scooter with him into the community. Jeff is married, has a young son and his wife had recently lost her job due to COVID-19. The family was living solely on his disability income. At referral Jeff presented to our program coordinator with a depressed demeanor. He was skeptical about the program asking in a doubtful tone “how easy it is to get a loan?”. It took some encouraging for him to pursue the program. Our coordinator reminded him that it didn’t cost anything to apply and that he did not have anything to lose. Jeff applied for a loan in the amount $2702.09 for a lift for his vehicle. He had a low credit score; a tight monthly budget and he was making monthly payments on a high interest title loan on one of his vehicles. The rep from our lending partner, Marisol Federal Credit Union who sits on our loan review committee relayed they could help Jeff with the high interest Title Loan. If he would put the vehicle up as collateral they could refinance this loan at a shorter term and save him about $220.00 month. Jeff in turn would then be able to use this savings to make the monthly AzLAT loan payment on the scooter lift. The AzLAT loan review committee tentatively approved his loan in the amount of $2702.09 loan for a term of 18 months contingent on these terms. Jeff agreed to this plan and stated, "I'll be paying less a month with these two loans than I did with the one." Jeff thanked our program coordinator over and over and he sounded more cheerful and hopeful. Once the AzLAT loan was funded Jeff was able to obtain his vehicle lift.

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 06 06
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 04 04
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 10 10
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 10 10
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 10 10
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 09 90%
Satisfied 01 10%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 10
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 12
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 12
C. Total 24

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 24

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 01 $1,948 $0 $1,948
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 01 $107 $0 $107
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 06 $2,737 $900 $1,837
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $2,500 $150 $2,350
Computers and Related 02 $460 $0 $460
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01 $4,500 $1,000 $3,500
Total 12 $12,252 $2,050 $10,202

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 12 $2,837 $2,128 $709
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 12 $2,837 $2,128 $709

D. Anecdote

Betty was looking for a TheraCycle 200 Forced Exercise Bike for her brother with a disability. The TheraCycle 200 is a motorized bike that moves the arms and pedals the legs even if the person is unable to manually push/pull or pedal. When she “‘Googled” the name of the bike she found the link to one that we had advertised on our AT Exchange site. She contacted our Reuse Coordinator and was guided through the process of registering for account on the AT Exchange site so she could be logged as an inquirer and get the contact information for the seller. The original MSRP of the bike was $4,500. Betty ended up purchasing it from the seller on our site for $1,000. We followed with her after the purchase and Betty stated she couldn’t be more pleased. The sale went smooth, the bike is in excellent condition, her brother uses it every day and she saved $3,500.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 02 02
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 01 20 21
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 01 22 23
5. None of the above 00 01 00 01
6. Subtotal 00 02 22 24
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 02 22 24
9. Performance on this measure NaN% 50% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 17 70.83%
Satisfied 07 29.17%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 24
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Our AT Exchange and Refurbishment activities were significantly reduced this year by three events: 1) The promotion of a part-time staff member who was doing the vast majority of our refurbishing activities to a full time position. 2) The cancelation of our in person conference due to COVID-19. We generally are able to market a wide variety of Reuse devices to participants at this conference. 3) The promotion of one of our ATS's to the AzTAP Program Director position. When we have hired a new ATS and and after COVID-19 when we are able to return to regular client services we are hoping to secure a volunteer to assist us with our device refurbishment activities and increase our numbers.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 494
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 54
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 26
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 49
Total 623

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 517
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 04
Representative of Education 26
Representative of Employment 01
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 55
Representatives of Community Living 06
Representatives of Technology 14
Total 623

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 14

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 112
Hearing 134
Speech Communication 324
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 301
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 67
Daily Living 341
Environmental Adaptations 274
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 01
Computers and Related 329
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 84
Total 1,967

E. Anecdote

A parent called asking AzTAP if we could help her out with a loaner iPad. She relayed that her 6 year daughter has a developmental disability and difficulty with speech. Her iPad was broken and it had been sent back to our state DDD organization for repair/replacement. On the iPad she had the TouchChat communication App with an extensive customized vocabulary. Mom did not know how to transfer her daughters customized vocabulary to a borrowed device. AzTAP was able to provide the family with a loaner iPad, the same voice the child had been using on her device as well as with in person technical support for Mom with transferring the backup of her daughter’s custom vocabulary to the borrowed device. The family was very pleased that their daughter could continue communicating with a familiar device.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 150 18 129 297
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 59 11 53 123
Subtotal 209 29 182 420
Have not made a decision 11 02 09 22
Subtotal 220 31 191 442
Nonrespondent 24 03 25 52
Total 244 34 216 494
Performance on this measure 95% 93.55% 95.29%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 01 00 05
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 28 15 31 74
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 32 16 33 81
5. None of the above 04 00 01 05
6. Subtotal 36 16 34 86
7. Nonrespondent 35 00 08 43
8. Total 71 16 42 129
9. Performance on this measure 64% 100% 97.06%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 499 80.1%
Satisfied 67 10.75%
Satisfied somewhat 05 0.8%
Not at all satisfied 03 0.48%
Nonrespondent 49 7.87%
Total Surveyed 623
Response rate % 92.13%

I. Notes:

The AzTAP general equipment loan program continued uninterrupted through COVID-19. Our ADE equipment loan program however due to COVID-19 saw a sharp decline in the number of loans due the closure of schools and the transition to online learning. As a result our overall number of devices loaned has been substantially reduced over last years total.

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 18
Hearing 07
Speech Communication 136
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 01
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 10
Daily Living 10
Environmental Adaptations 10
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 17
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 01
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 210

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 209
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 267
Representatives of Education 03
Representatives of Employment 04
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 34
Representative of Community Living 07
Representative of Technology 04
Total 528

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 00
Service Provider 00
Vendor 12
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 12

D. Anecdote

A family with a 12 year old son contacted AzTAP. Their son, Jimmy had Dyslexia and be was being homeschooled because his parents felt he had fallen behind. The families presenting goals were to get him caught up academically, find some AT to assist him with reading and to get him back to school so he could be with his friends. They had heard about and Jimmy had tried the OrCam My Eye 2. They had held off on purchasing this device, because the OrCam Read was coming out in the Spring of 2020 and they wanted to try that device since it was designed for persons with Dyslexia and is about 1/3rd the price. Once the device came out and was available AzTAP added it to our inventory. Due to COVID-19 the family had a virtual demonstration of it with the AzTAP ATS and the product representative. They opted to borrow the device via our equipment loan program so that Jimmy could try it out at home. Ultimately, Jimmy chose to go with the OrCam My Eye 2 becuase he liked how it attached to his glasses so that he would not have to carry something around. The family purchased the OrCam My Eye 2 for Jimmy.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 04 10 174 188
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 01 15 16
Subtotal 04 11 189 204
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 04 11 189 204
Nonrespondent 00 02 04 06
Total 04 13 193 210
Performance on this measure 100% 84.62% 97.93%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 516 97.73%
Satisfied 12 2.27%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 528
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Due to COVID-19 AzTAP experienced a significant decline from last year device demonstration services. Since March 2020 our number of demonstration referrals has declined significantly. When possible and appropriate virtual demonstration services were offered and encouraged but they were not often not accepted. Internal issues with a contracted funding source also impacted our device demonstration numbers this year.

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 01 08 13
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 28 16 55 99
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 02 02
4. Subtotal 32 17 65 114
5. None of the above 04 01 01 06
6. Subtotal 36 18 66 120
7. Nonrespondent 35 00 08 43
8. Total 71 18 74 163
9. Performance on this measure 69.57% 94.44% 95.45% 86.15%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 154 28 303 485
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 59 12 68 139
Subtotal 213 40 371 624
Have not made a decision 11 02 09 22
Subtotal 224 42 380 646
Nonrespondent 24 05 29 58
Total 248 47 409 704
Performance on this measure 95.09% 90.91% 96.61% 95.71%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.30% 95% Met
Response Rate 95.86% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 54
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 33
Representatives of Education 485
Representatives of Employment 292
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 395
Representatives of Community Living 230
Representatives of Technology 187
Unable to Categorize 212
TOTAL 1,888

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,637 204 47 1,888

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 1,166
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 02
Combination of any/all of the above 383
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 08
Transition 329
Total 1,888

C. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

AzTAP was asked to provide a training for a local private school that incorporates learning about persons with disabilities and their needs into its curriculum starting in the 1st grade. They teach them about different disabilities and then have a guest speaker to discuss what it is like for them living with their disability. When they get to second grade, they learn what AT is and how it can assist a person with a disability. AzTAP & our Department of Education (ADE) program staff came together to run this training. We divided the group of fifty five second grade children into three groups. We first discussed with each group how someone with a disability may do an activity and they provided us with ideas and all sorts of possibilities. We then set up stations of AT devices from the following categories; hearing, vision, computers, speech, daily living and games/sports. We reviewed each one of the AT devices with each group and how a person with a disability could use each item. Everyone, including the teachers and the aids asked several questions about the devices. There were a few second graders that even came up with future AT possibilities to help individuals with disabilities.

Briefly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Due to COVID-19 our full annual assistive technology conference was modified to a smaller virtual format this year. As part of that event AzTAP and our Department of Education partner hosted the following workshop “Pump the Brakes: Merging Assistive Technology & Transition Planning”. This workshop focused on strategies to support students with high incidence disabilities in understanding and prioritizing their post-secondary AT needs. Participants were able to discover or refine strategies that will prepare them with identifying appropriate AT and ways to support the instruction of the use of the tool (s) within the transition planning process. Hypothetical examples of AT will be presented, and connections will be made to the various post-secondary environments (employment, education/training, and independent living).

Briefly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

Due to COVID-19 our full annual assistive technology conference was modified to a smaller virtual format this year. As part of that event AzTAP and an Accessibility Analyst with our parent organization hosted the following workshop “ Demystifying Web Accessibility”. The workshops main focus was on taking some of the mystery or unknowns out of website accessibility. Workshop participants learned how accessibility and usability relate and if you follow universal design practices and have a good foundation that better accessibility is an attainable result. Specific information was provided on the four foundational principles of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), the requirement for Public Education Agency (PEA’s) to provide accessible instructional materials on their website as well as the importance of “hands on testing” instead of automated accessibility testing. Workshop participants received a resource list to help them get started on the right track.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 03
Training or Technical Assistance will be developed or implemented 05
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 08
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Under COVID-19 AzTAP has shifted our training services when possible to a virtual format. We will continue to do this until we can return to in person training services.

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 0%
Employment 100%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 0%
Community Living 0%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 0%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

AzTAP was contacted by a staff member with a training services provider that provides training for Forestry Department and other government employees. They had a situation with an employee who was Deaf that worked in a rural environment. They were having a hard time finding/getting reliable ASL interpreter services for her. Unfortunately, they did not have reliable cellular or Wi-Fi coverage in the area for remote interpreting style services. Our customer was needing suggestions on AT options that their organization could explore to better accommodate her auditory communication needs in a variety of settings. Our ATS explored low and mid tech options/strategies with the organization that did not require a connection to operate such as the employee self ID’ing to with an “I’m Deaf” button; a Boogie Board and iPad/iPhone iOS AAC ASL/English interpretation, writing and typing to text iOS Apps.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

AzTAP did not have a Technical Assistance project request that was related to transition.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. AzTAP staff was asked to do an overview presentation on our programs and services for the city of Phoenix Mayor's Commission on Disability Issues. Normally, this presentation would be done in person at one of their monthly meetings; but, due to COVID-19 we provided it virtually via Zoom. A fully accessible PowerPoint was prepared and provided to the Commission and their participants. During the Zoom presentation we reviewed the salient features of each our services for device demonstration, equipment loan (both AzTAP and ADE programs), our Reuse services, alternative financing program, training program as well as technical assistance. We were also able to give an overview of how COVID-19 was impacting the delivery of each activity and relay that our current COVID-19 operational plan was available on the homepage of our website. At the conclusion of the presentation we took questions about our program services as well as AT needs in general. Participants were provided with AzTAP's contact information as well as how to make referrals.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 410 267 677
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 313 291 604
Representative of Education 196 18 214
Representative of Employment 27 00 27
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 325 36 361
Representative of Community Living 93 17 110
Representative of Technology 31 06 37
Unable to Categorize 34 02 36
Total 1,429 637 2,066

Notes:

Due to COVID-19 AzTAP experienced a significant decline in the number of I & A contacts over last year.

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Public/State Agency$178,284Device Loan
Public/State Agency$30,000Training
Federal$317,594Demonstration
Amount: $525,878

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Revenues were down this year from the demonstration funding source due to internal issues and the effects of COVID-19 on the program.


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Thu Feb 04 2021 13:16:44 GMT-0600 (Central Standard Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY20 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.