Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 13 | 00 | 13 |
Approved Not made | 01 | 00 | 01 |
Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 14 | 00 | 14 |
Lowest Income: | $9,169 | Highest Income: | $100,000 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$601,082 | 13 | $46,237 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 02 | 04 | 01 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 13 |
Percentage of Loans | 15.38% | 30.77% | 7.69% | 7.69% | 15.38% | 23.08% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 13 | 100% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 13 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
Partnership Loans | 13 | $225,380 |
Total | 13 | $225,380 |
Lowest | 4% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
53 | 13 | 4.07692307692308% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 11 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 02 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 13 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $3,500 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $3,185 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 11 | $218,695 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 13 | $225,380 |
Number Loans in default | 01 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $4,551 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | telecommunications distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 05 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 02 |
C. Total Served | 07 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 07 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 04 | $5,318 |
Hearing | 02 | $1,155 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 02 | $163 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 08 | $6,636 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
The Connecticut Tech Act Project assisted a family who had been trying for many years to obtain a much needed Modified Vehicle for an individual with Anoxic Encephalopathy a degenerative disease of the brain. He uses a power wheelchair and had to rely on public transportation, friends and good weather to get to doctor and therapy appointments, while the sole provider for the family of five worked 2 jobs to keep them going. Unfortunately, they were previously denied a loan due to insufficient funds, however this time we worked with the family to pursue grant funds and they also raised $2550 through a GoFundMe campaign. Through our connections with various agencies who provide grants, the consumer was able to receive $7000 in grants from one agency and $3028 from another leaving a balance that was small enough to allow us to approve a loan. In the words of the family, “If it wasn’t for the generous donations and hard work of everyone this wouldn’t have been possible. We are forever grateful for this has changed our family’s lives for the better.”
An individual who previously received services from our National Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution Program (NDBEDP) returned for additional services. He has Cerebral Palsy and uses a wheelchair for mobility. He is hard of hearing and visually impaired in one eye with no sight in the other. His health has deteriorated causing additional hearing and visual loss. His combination of the visual loss and the CP makes his hand and finger dexterity limited, therefore the voice input (Siri or dictate option) is important for his independence. When using the iPhone, he turns zoom on and off as needed, but does not need to use it as much on the iPad due to the larger display. With his previous phone, he struggled to hear it, see it or utilize the home button which required finger dexterity. The new iPhone XS Max has been a much better fit for him as there is no home button and he is able to utilize the loud speaker phone on it as well as the large display. Rodney can now communicate with doctors, family & friends. Because of the positive impact this program has had on him, he has referred two of his family members who also have visual and hearing loss to our program.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 01 | 03 | 11 | 15 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 03 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 04 | 14 | 19 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 04 | 15 | 20 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 04 | 15 | 20 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 93.33% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 17 | 85% |
Satisfied | 03 | 15% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 20 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
During this fiscal year the Assistive Technology Loan Program manager was able to assist 10 individuals in obtaining a total of $187,146.77 in additional funding from grant and state funding programs. This allowed applicants to reduce the amount of their loan request and/or rescind their application.
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 659 |
C. Total | 659 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 659 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 05 | $4,735 | $1,065 | $3,670 |
Hearing | 01 | $120 | $0 | $120 |
Speech Communication | 02 | $220 | $200 | $20 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 35 | $32,249 | $150 | $32,099 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 563 | $251,483 | $37,974 | $213,509 |
Daily Living | 80 | $15,602 | $1,850 | $13,752 |
Environmental Adaptations | 01 | $30 | $0 | $30 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 03 | $1,615 | $0 | $1,615 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | $2,384 | $170 | $2,214 |
Total | 694 | $308,438 | $41,409 | $267,029 |
The AT Act Program, partner agency, NEAT Equipment Services is always happy to serve those in our community and beyond. Often customers come to us with various financial difficulties and we do our best to help. On July 10, 2019 Consuelo Garvirta, a longtime customer, arrived to NEAT for repair consultation of her power wheelchair. It was explained to the her that the technician found her wheelchair to be irreparable due to the number of broken parts. The chair was broken so badly that we wondered how she even made it to NEAT. The Customer Service Representative explained to her that she could get replacement refurbished wheelchair for $750.00. Consuelo sobbed as she could not afford another power wheelchair nor was it feasible for her to make any payments. It was decided that NEAT would replace her old chair with a refurbished J6 Power Wheelchair by Pride Mobility at $0.00.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 02 | 02 | 345 | 349 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 37 | 05 | 264 | 306 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 01 | 03 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 39 | 08 | 612 | 659 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 39 | 08 | 612 | 659 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 39 | 08 | 612 | 659 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 647 | 98.18% |
Satisfied | 05 | 0.76% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.3% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 05 | 0.76% |
Total Surveyed | 659 | |
Response rate % | 99.24% |
Data for Reuse is dramatically down this fiscal year, including number of individuals served and costs savings to consumers, due to the fact that the CT AT Act Program contracted partner, the New England Assistive Technology (NEAT) Center who operates the Equipment Recycling Center (ERC) in partnership with us, closed the ERC program in the Spring / Fall of 2018. NEAT overhauled their program, redefined policies and procedures. They also purged old equipment that could not be reused and established best practices as well as redefined the type of equipment they would accept for reuse. The ERC has a soft reopening in Fall of 2018 via appointment only and towards the end of 2018 they were fully opened and operational. However, as a result of being closed for several months as well as redefining the equipment they could accept, the data is lower than usual, however, we feel strongly that the quality of services and products received by consumers is improved.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 239 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 32 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 123 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 08 |
Total | 402 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 189 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 09 |
Representative of Education | 157 |
Representative of Employment | 03 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 23 |
Representatives of Community Living | 20 |
Representatives of Technology | 01 |
Total | 402 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 12 |
Hearing | 08 |
Speech Communication | 170 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 152 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 06 |
Daily Living | 26 |
Environmental Adaptations | 54 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 237 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 20 |
Total | 685 |
The Proloquo4Text app was trialed by middle school student with Chromosome 18 Deletion. This app was selected based on Serena’s abilities, needs and familiarity with features such as word prediction which she uses on her Chromebook. She needed a device that looks like a phone due to social needs. The size of the 4-inch iPod Touch appealed to her and Serena enjoyed customizing Proloquo4Text to change the voice and on-screen colors to the ones she liked best. She was oriented to the layout of the word prediction choices and text-to-speech play button. Serena quickly demonstrated an understanding for the app and was able to use it to communicate words when listeners did not understand her voice. Without the EASTCONN Lending Library, this Assistive Technology would not have been trialed because the district would not justify purchasing it prior to a successful trial.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 105 | 05 | 100 | 210 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 13 | 03 | 02 | 18 |
Subtotal | 118 | 08 | 102 | 228 |
Have not made a decision | 04 | 01 | 02 | 07 |
Subtotal | 122 | 09 | 104 | 235 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 122 | 13 | 104 | 239 |
Performance on this measure | 96.72% | 88.89% | 98.08% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 31 | 00 | 02 | 33 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 15 | 03 | 67 | 85 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 02 | 00 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 48 | 05 | 69 | 122 |
5. None of the above | 11 | 01 | 05 | 17 |
6. Subtotal | 59 | 06 | 74 | 139 |
7. Nonrespondent | 24 | 00 | 00 | 24 |
8. Total | 83 | 06 | 74 | 163 |
9. Performance on this measure | 76.98% | 83.33% | 93.24% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 254 | 63.18% |
Satisfied | 112 | 27.86% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.75% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 33 | 8.21% |
Total Surveyed | 402 | |
Response rate % | 91.79% |
The 24 non-respondents under education are from our computer loan program at Southern CT State University. Loans were provided at the beginning of the Fall semester (Sept) and didn't end until after the the fiscal year ended (Dec). The new University Assistant obtained the performance measures at the end of the loans but it was too late to enter them and therefore they are reported as non-respondents for this year.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 48 |
Hearing | 13 |
Speech Communication | 43 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 64 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 08 |
Daily Living | 62 |
Environmental Adaptations | 30 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 22 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 07 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 297 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 324 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 114 |
Representatives of Education | 319 |
Representatives of Employment | 36 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 134 |
Representative of Community Living | 256 |
Representative of Technology | 40 |
Total | 1,223 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 73 |
Service Provider | 05 |
Vendor | 834 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 912 |
Video games are so prevalent now and making them accessible for young people with disabilities allows them to engage with their peers in ways they might not otherwise have been able to. The NEAT Center’s assistive technology team worked with Ahmed, a 15-year-old avid gamer who was looking for better ways to game despite the challenges of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Ahmed uses a power wheelchair in his daily life and has limited mobility in his arms. He can hold a typical controller and access all of its buttons, but experiences hand fatigue when playing for long periods or physically demanding games. As part of the demo, we looked at Ahmed’s physical positioning when he plays and tried a few low-tech solutions that will make playing much more comfortable and ergonomic. We also explored in-system accessibility features that Ahmed was unaware of, which allowed us to remap his existing controller in ways that make it easier to use. Lastly, we did a demo of a specialized adapted controller and it completely changed his game play. He determined this exciting device would meet his needs and he was referred to our lending library to borrow the device until he can get one of his own.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 102 | 12 | 173 | 287 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 05 | 00 | 02 | 07 |
Subtotal | 107 | 12 | 175 | 294 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 02 | 03 |
Subtotal | 108 | 12 | 177 | 297 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 108 | 12 | 177 | 297 |
Performance on this measure | 99.07% | 100% | 98.87% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 889 | 72.69% |
Satisfied | 330 | 26.98% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 04 | 0.33% |
Total | 1,223 | |
Response rate % | 99.67% |
AT Demonstration numbers may be lower than past years as during the fiscal year 2 demonstration centers lost their key staff who oversees the AT demonstrations for the CT Assistive Technology Act Program. The Eastern CT Assistive Technology Center was able to hire someone fairly quickly. Although training has been provided it will take some time for her to get the AT demonstration numbers back up to par. The Western CT Assistive Technology Center lost their key staff person who oversees AT Demos for the AT Act program in January. They hired and we trained a new person who moved to a different program after a few months and they only restaffed the position after the fiscal year ended.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 34 | 05 | 358 | 397 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 52 | 09 | 334 | 395 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 03 | 03 | 08 |
4. Subtotal | 88 | 17 | 695 | 800 |
5. None of the above | 11 | 01 | 06 | 18 |
6. Subtotal | 99 | 18 | 701 | 818 |
7. Nonrespondent | 24 | 00 | 00 | 24 |
8. Total | 123 | 18 | 701 | 842 |
9. Performance on this measure | 86.87% | 77.78% | 98.72% | 96.82% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 207 | 17 | 273 | 497 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 18 | 03 | 04 | 25 |
Subtotal | 225 | 20 | 277 | 522 |
Have not made a decision | 05 | 01 | 04 | 10 |
Subtotal | 230 | 21 | 281 | 532 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 230 | 25 | 281 | 536 |
Performance on this measure | 97.83% | 95.24% | 98.58% | 98.12% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.78% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 98.18% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 359 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 102 |
Representatives of Education | 2,064 |
Representatives of Employment | 116 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 159 |
Representatives of Community Living | 59 |
Representatives of Technology | 20 |
Unable to Categorize | 131 |
TOTAL | 3,010 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
2,025 | 879 | 106 | 3,010 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,012 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 51 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 1,887 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 58 |
Transition | 02 |
Total | 3,010 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
As part of Disability Employment Awareness month, AT Act Program Director provided training to Human Resource personal of approximately 20 employers in CT on how to create an inclusive workplace via Assistive Technology, Universal Design and accommodations. Real world examples and scenarios were reviewed, there was opportunity for Q&A, and the session was well received. The HR personal planned to take back the resources and information learned to help improve their worksites and make them more inclusive. Several of the HR personal scheduled additional training with Program Director for their HR and management Teams.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
AT Act partner, CREC, provided a training that focused on the inclusion of Assistive Technology (AT) in Transition Planning including CT Core Transition Skills. Participants were provided with resources to assist them in incorporating AT into their Transition planning, including information on the CT Tech Act Project’s device recycling, device loans, device demonstrations and funding sources to assist students as they transition from school to post-secondary and employment settings.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
CT AT Act program partner NEAT provided over 10 hours of ICT training to their parent organization Oak Hill - one of the largest non-profit organizations in CT - to review and help Oak Hill staff understand and address accessibility to ensure access for individuals who may utilize adaptive software or AT such as screen reading software. Areas that were addressed included new website solutions adopted by Oak Hill; their social media applications; tablets/apps that are used in group homes for timekeeping; and Camp Brain - a website solution used to accept applications for their two camps Camp Harkness and Camp Hemlocks. Approximately 6 people were included in these services including Development and Marketing, IT, Legal, Project Manager and Senior Management. The training resulted in accessible websites and web-based solutions for Oak Hill programs and they plan to ensure accessibility moving forward.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 20 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 32 |
No known outcome at this time | 06 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 58 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 89.7% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 46% |
---|---|
Employment | 32% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 0% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 22% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
AT Act Program Director has been working with CT State University System and state Vocational Rehabilitation agency to assist in creating universal design and accessible materials to all students - as well as a career path for VR consumers to be able to provide this service as a part of a work experience that will lead to competitive employment for consumers while providing faculty the ability to ensure that all materials used are accessible to all students. The impact of this project, if it is successful, could be far reaching as all state community colleges and universities would be able to have a direct line of trained VR consumers who can provide this service and VR consumers come away with real world experience and a formal recommendation to apply to job placement opportunities, if not on the campuses elsewhere in the state.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The CT AT Act Program Director continues to provide technical assistance to the Bureau of Rehabilitation Services for their WIOA Pre-Employment Transition Program (known as Level Up), specifically, overseeing the “Level Up Camp.” This camp began in 2015 as an “AT Camp” and only had about five students in attendance the first year. The Level Up Camp, which is a one week sleep away camp at Camp Harkness coordinated in partnership with the NEAT Center, has expanded to 30 students with a wait list and now includes Career Exploration, interview preparedness, introduction to college, job readiness, and work experiences at a variety of employers. Students in attendance can to participate in 3 out of 10 work experiences and continue to learn about Assistive Technology and have access to AT during camp as needed. Next summer 2020, camp will expand to 2 separate sessions of 30 students each and we have no doubt we will be able to fill all the slots.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. Partner agency, the New England Assistive Technology (NEAT) Center partnered with AARP to film "Real Possibilities" which aired on WINTV to raise awareness of the Smart Home on Wheels (SHOW) and inform the viewers about smart technology as it relates to independent living for individuals with disabilities, aging adults and their caregivers.
2. 310 attendees participated in the day long CT Achievement Through Assistive Technology conference, which also included 30 exhibitors and 20 break out sessions. The primary focus of this bi-annual conference is to help professionals who work with individuals with disabilities who may benefit from Assistive Technology. Our goal is to raise their awareness of AT, their knowledge, skills and awareness of resources available in our state.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 95 | 36 | 131 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 71 | 33 | 104 |
Representative of Education | 102 | 05 | 107 |
Representative of Employment | 69 | 06 | 75 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 79 | 09 | 88 |
Representative of Community Living | 57 | 09 | 66 |
Representative of Technology | 20 | 00 | 20 |
Unable to Categorize | 04 | 00 | 04 |
Total | 497 | 98 | 595 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Federal | $12,778 | State Financing |
Federal | $29,307 | Device Loan |
Federal | $29,307 | Public Awareness, I&A |
Federal | $29,307 | Technical Assistance |
Federal | $29,307 | Training |
Amount: $130,006 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 09 2020 08:36:08 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)