National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Back to state program information page

Tennessee 2019

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Tennessee Technology Access Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
https://www.tn.gov/humanservices/ds/ttap.html
Mailing Address:
505 Deaderick St., James K. Polk Building, 15th Floor
City:
Nashville
State:
TN
Zip Code:
37243
Program Email:
TN.TTAP@tn.gov
Phone:
615-313-5183
TTY:

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Tennessee Department of Human Services
Mailing Address:
505 Deaderick St., James K. Polk Building
City:
Nashville
State:
TN
Zip Code:
37243
Program URL:
http://tn.gov/humanservices

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Kimberly Lilley
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
615-532-4103
E-mail:
kim.lilley@tn.gov
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Mandy Johnson
Title:
Assistant Commissioner, Div of Rehab Services
Phone:
615-770-5496
E-mail:
Mandy.1.Johnson@tn.gov
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Kimberly Lilley
Title:
Executive Director
Phone:
615-532-4103
E-mail:
kim.lilley@tn.gov

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? No
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? No

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 00


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

Impact Area

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 00 00
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 00 00
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% NaN%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied 00 NaN%
Satisfied somewhat 00 NaN%
Not at all satisfied 00 NaN%
Nonrespondent 00 NaN%
Total Surveyed 00
Response rate % NaN%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 1,839
C. Total 1,839

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 1,839

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 206 $67,493 $0 $67,493
Hearing 08 $1,684 $0 $1,684
Speech Communication 24 $20,338 $0 $20,338
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 195 $7,375 $0 $7,375
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 769 $221,476 $0 $221,476
Daily Living 592 $104,443 $0 $104,443
Environmental Adaptations 29 $725 $0 $725
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 98 $12,903 $0 $12,903
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 26 $3,747 $0 $3,747
Total 1,947 $440,184 $0 $440,184

D. Anecdote

Several of the Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partnering AT centers provide adapted toys throughout the year and host annual toy events each December. The 2018 adapted toy giveaway hosted in southeast TN had a great turnout! Many community members including employees of a local Komatsu factory, occupational & physical therapy students from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga and Lions Club members donated additional toys to the program and helped adapt them with instruction from AT center staff. All toys were adapted so recipients can use an external switch that suits their abilities to play independently. Purchasing pre-adapted toys and switches can be expensive, often prohibiting families from acquiring the items on their own. The AT center has created several of their own switch designs made at a fraction of the cost of commercially available switches. The AT center gave away over 140 adapted toys and capability switches as part of the event. For some children, a switch and adapted toy become the first opportunity to control something in their environment independently. These simple toys act as ambassadors for assistive technology, fostering the development of skills necessary for communication and educational opportunities.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 58 29 1,492 1,579
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 66 03 16 85
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 10 04 65 79
4. Subtotal 134 36 1,573 1,743
5. None of the above 06 06 84 96
6. Subtotal 140 42 1,657 1,839
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 140 42 1,657 1,839
9. Performance on this measure 95.71% 85.71% 94.93%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,803 98.04%
Satisfied 30 1.63%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 06 0.33%
Total Surveyed 1,839
Response rate % 99.67%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 249
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 09
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 32
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 21
Total 311

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 192
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 38
Representative of Education 33
Representative of Employment 02
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 20
Representatives of Community Living 14
Representatives of Technology 12
Total 311

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 92
Hearing 17
Speech Communication 41
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 47
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 31
Daily Living 66
Environmental Adaptations 26
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 65
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 25
Total 410

E. Anecdote

Tennessee received and inquiry from an individual needing assistance for her father after his recent heart attack. Complications made it difficult for him to leave the house to get in the car to go to the doctor’ s office and other necessary places. She desperately needed a transport chair as a short-term accommodation. Within 24 hours, the AT center provided her a loaner wheelchair to assist with her father’s mobility needs. The daughter was tremendously grateful and expressed the following quote: "Thanks for loaning a transport chair to help transport my dad to and from the doctor and other places. My dad recently had a heart attack and it was difficult for me to get him into a vehicle. I was skeptical about using your loaner program. Honestly, I thought that it was not beneficial to people who had temporary disabilities. I was wrong. Thank you."

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 37 13 126 176
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 02 04 19 25
Subtotal 39 17 145 201
Have not made a decision 19 01 19 39
Subtotal 58 18 164 240
Nonrespondent 03 04 02 09
Total 61 22 166 249
Performance on this measure 67.24% 94.44% 88.41%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 11 00 20 31
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 11 02 08 21
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 01 02 03
4. Subtotal 22 03 30 55
5. None of the above 00 01 05 06
6. Subtotal 22 04 35 61
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 00 01
8. Total 23 04 35 62
9. Performance on this measure 100% 75% 85.71%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 265 85.21%
Satisfied 25 8.04%
Satisfied somewhat 04 1.29%
Not at all satisfied 04 1.29%
Nonrespondent 13 4.18%
Total Surveyed 311
Response rate % 95.82%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 264
Hearing 13
Speech Communication 10
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 13
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 26
Daily Living 89
Environmental Adaptations 01
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 62
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 03
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 481

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 365
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 190
Representatives of Education 35
Representatives of Employment 05
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 67
Representative of Community Living 18
Representative of Technology 00
Total 680

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 100
Service Provider 130
Vendor 148
Repair Service 18
Others 00
Total 396

D. Anecdote

In March 2019, one of TTAP’s partnering AT centers in southeast TN received an inquiry from an 83 year old woman losing her vision as a result of macular degeneration. Her declining vision made maintaining her independence more difficult, and she visited the center for demonstrations of AT to her regain those freedoms. The AT center’s rehabilitation engineer showed her various assistive phones, but she preferred to continue using her iPhone. The AT center staff showed her how to enable the Voiceover screen reader on her iPhone. She responded well to using Voiceover, which reads aloud information on the phone so that it is accessible for an individual with low vision. The center staff gave her a crash course in using the application and expressed that she was welcome to call at any time if needing more assistance. While at the center, staff also installed the BARD reading program on her iPad (with Voiceover enables) to provide her with access to titles from the Tennessee Library for the Blind. Demonstrations of other magnifying and reading devices occurred during the visit. Through this process, she determined after trying several wearable magnifiers that they did not suit her needs. However, she decided that a wearable camera and speaker system (OrCam) was beneficial. The system detects the when an individual points to a passage if text, such as a paragraph in a book, a sign mounted on the wall, or a menu. The camera takes a picture, the system processes the image and then the text is read aloud through an earpiece. She found this technology very exciting. The AT center staff provided her family the vendor’s contact information so she could explore acquiring a device of her own. The technology will help her continue doing things that she loves independently.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 40 27 259 326
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 03 04 20 27
Subtotal 43 31 279 353
Have not made a decision 17 03 81 101
Subtotal 60 34 360 454
Nonrespondent 12 00 15 27
Total 72 34 375 481
Performance on this measure 59.72% 91.18% 74.4%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 525 77.21%
Satisfied 66 9.71%
Satisfied somewhat 07 1.03%
Not at all satisfied 05 0.74%
Nonrespondent 77 11.32%
Total 680
Response rate % 88.68%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 69 29 1,512 1,610
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 77 05 24 106
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 10 05 67 82
4. Subtotal 156 39 1,603 1,798
5. None of the above 06 07 89 102
6. Subtotal 162 46 1,692 1,900
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 00 01
8. Total 163 46 1,692 1,901
9. Performance on this measure 90.12% 73.91% 90.78% 90.32%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 77 40 385 502
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 05 08 39 52
Subtotal 82 48 424 554
Have not made a decision 36 04 100 140
Subtotal 118 52 524 694
Nonrespondent 15 04 17 36
Total 133 56 541 730
Performance on this measure 63.08% 92.31% 78.66% 76.84%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Not Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.27% 95% Met
Response Rate 96.61% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 441
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 148
Representatives of Education 237
Representatives of Employment 47
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 79
Representatives of Community Living 91
Representatives of Technology 24
Unable to Categorize 19
TOTAL 1,086

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
1,020 50 16 1,086

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 706
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 65
Combination of any/all of the above 71
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 240
Transition 04
Total 1,086

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

In January of 2019, the Tennessee Technology Access Program’s East Tennessee partnering assistive technology (AT) center conducted a training for the Center for Literacy, Education, and Employment at the University of Tennessee. This event brought service providers to AT center. Many of the participants had never been to the AT center and were unaware of the extensive technology available to enhance the opportunities of individuals with disabilities. Training consisted of demonstrations by staff and hands-on experience with durable medical equipment, devices for low vision, communication devices and innovation for greater mobility. The goal of the training was to equip participants with an improved understanding of how technology can be a very effective strategy and/or solution to assist individuals with disabilities complete tasks they could not do otherwise. The outcome of the training included providers having an increased knowledge of AT and being better equipped to make referrals for technology evaluations in the future to help customers reach their goals.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

In June the Tennessee Technology Access Program (TTAP) partnering assistive technology (AT) center in southeast TN hosted ChatterCamp for the fourth year. This is an intensive week-long program for nonverbal children using an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device to communicate. During ChatterCamp, every student uses an AAC device and large gains in individual performance are achieved between the synergistic combination of peer interaction and intensive modeling. As ChatterCamp is held in summer, all the students are transitioning between grades, with some of them transitioning between schools based on their ages. The steps the children take toward improved effective communication facilitate their ability to share needs, wants, independent thoughts, questions and goals. All the gains are important to increasing their independence as transitioning to the next steps of their education and more independent lives. During the camp, AT center staff worked with 16 children. The theme of the camp revolved around transportation. In addition to working on the verbal communication, each student wrote (using their devices) several sentences about the events of the day. In this way, not only are AT staff teaching them to use their AAC devices for "spoken" communication and conversation, but also teaching them how to use the devices for written communication (e.g. subject verb agreement, sentence structure, etc. Each individual story with pictures of the time that they spent at camp, narrated in their own words, was sent home with them at the end of the week. As the week progressed, participants were observed initiating conversations with their devices and parents reported some children requesting their devices to communicate which they had not done previously.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

The Tennessee Technology Access Program’s (TTAP) partnering assistive technology (AT) center that serving southeast Tennessee hosted their first Accessible Technology Summit event as part of Global Accessibility Awareness Day (GAAD) at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC) in collaboration with corporate sponsors. GAAD was celebrate on May 16th, 2019, as a global initiative to get everyone talking, thinking and learning about digital access and inclusion. The Accessible Technology Summit provided over 176 participants the opportunity to attend four breakout sessions and the keynote presentation by Haben Girma, the first Deaf-Blind graduate from Harvard Law school. The Accessible Technology Summit creates a forum for individuals with disabilities and professionals in human resource (HR), information technology (IT), marketing, web design, and education to network with experts in the AT industry. The breakout sessions provided training on accessible documents, accessible web design, and accessibility options in the workplace. Each session was taught by a local business or organization professional, with AT center staff present to support each breakout session. Each breakout sessions was held twice to allow attendees an opportunity to attend two different sessions. Feedback from participants was very positive. One attendee commented: “the breadth of attendees, particularly for a first-year summit, tells me not just our community, but the region, is -hungry- for events and opportunities like these. I am thrilled the AT center took this on, and I think Chattanooga through the TTAP program has an opportunity to put a flag in the ground, saying that accessibility, equity and inclusion are core tenets of what it means to be Gig City.”

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 44
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 20
No known outcome at this time 22
Nonrespondent 154
Total 240
Performance Measure Percentage 26.7%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

The ICT performance measure was not much, as a large portion of this ICT training for the year occurred at the Accessible Technology Summit referenced in the ICT anecdote. The AT center sent out the surveys necessary for data collection electronically after the conclusion of the event. The response rate of the surveys was very low, significantly contributing the unmet ICT performance measure. Guidance was provided to the centers to gather surveys at the time of the event to ensure more data is collected, particularly if hosting a large event again in the future.

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 24.9%
Employment 3.29%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 3.35%
Community Living 13.34%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 55.06%
Total 99.94%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The Tennessee Technology Access Program’s (TTAP) east Tennessee partnering assistive technology (AT) center provided technical assistance to an area American Job Center (AJC) requesting a review of the computer lab accessibility and guidance for improvements to maximize the usability for individuals of all ages, backgrounds and abilities applying for jobs. The inquiry for assistance was initially prompted as a result of an individual with vison loss asking the AJC about use of a screen reader. The AT center staff provided input on ways to help those applying for jobs do so more independently while using the Jobs4TN software. AT center staff provided feedback to ensure individuals could fully participate in other job-seeking workshops and activities. Among other suggestions, the AT center made a basic recommendation of adding a larger monitor to at least one computer with more ideas to incorporate in the future. Working collaboratively with the Disability Resource Coordinator, the AT c

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. On September 6, 2019, TTAP’s southeast assistive technology (AT) center participated in the “Living alone with Alzheimer’s” conference. The theme of this conference focused on reaching community leaders and support services to assist individuals living with Alzheimer’s who live alone without the support system of close family. The event was attended by over 65 individuals. Amongst the vendors as the conference, the AT center provided the only information related to assistive technology at the event. Many individuals visited the booth to ask questions and learn more about AT, providing center staff the opportunity to inform individuals and professionals about the TTAP program. The AT center staff demonstrated tools to help maintain independence, such as digital organizers and memory aids. The AT staff also showed several pieces of technology not specifically related to executive functioning and memory loss, such as magnification and hearing alert systems. Many people have coexisting disabilities in addition to Alzheimer’s that could limit their independence. The AT center gave an hour-long presentation on the use of digital assistance from items such as Amazon Alexa, Google Home, and Apple’s Siri to increase independence as well. These tools can help with memory functions (reminding someone to take medicine or letting a person know what events are have planned for the day), executive functioning (making a grocery list, planning an event, setting an alarm to go off every morning, structuring data), and controlling devices such as the lights and thermostats.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service		 AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 611 114 725
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 393 92 485
Representative of Education 142 04 146
Representative of Employment 27 01 28
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 461 15 476
Representative of Community Living 116 01 117
Representative of Technology 03 00 03
Unable to Categorize 09 00 09
Total 1,762 227 1,989

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? No

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).

Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 09 2020 08:49:27 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)

Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY19 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.