National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Missouri 2019

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Missouri Assistive Technology
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.at.mo.gov
Mailing Address:
1501 N.W. Jefferson
City:
Blue Springs
State:
Missouri
Zip Code:
64015
Program Email:
info@mo-at.org
Phone:
816-655-6700
TTY:
816-655-6710

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Missouri Assistive Technology
Mailing Address:
1501 N.W. Jefferson
City:
Blue Springs
State:
Missouri
Zip Code:
64015
Program URL:
www.at.mo.gov

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Baker, David
Title:
Director
Phone:
816-655-6707
E-mail:
dbaker@mo-at.org
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Baker, David
Title:
Director
Phone:
816-655-6707
E-mail:
dbaker@mo-at.org
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Baker, David
Title:
Director
Phone:
816-655-6707
E-mail:
dbaker@mo-at.org

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 28 09 37
Approved Not made 00 01 01
Rejected 00 01 01
Total 28 11 39

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $9,000 Highest Income: $152,190

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$2,060,759 37 $55,696

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 07 07 03 09 03 08 37
Percentage of Loans 18.92% 18.92% 8.11% 24.32% 8.11% 21.62% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 37 100%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 00 0%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 37 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 37 $287,974
Partnership Loans 00 $0
Total 37 $287,974

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 1%
Highest 4%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
124 37 3.35135135135135%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 08
2.1% to 4.0% 29
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 37

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 02 $4,698
Hearing 13 $52,841
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 01 $575
Environmental adaptations 09 $51,530
Vehicle modification and transportation 12 $178,330
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 37 $287,974

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 03
Net loss for loans in default $5,460

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 02
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity? last resort activity
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 08
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 10
C. Total Served 18

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 18

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 01 $5,875
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 02 $3,833
Mobility, seating and positioning 08 $16,076
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 04 $16,028
Vehicle modification and transportation 02 $11,673
Computers and related 00 $0
Recreation, sports, and leisure 01 $1,595
Total 18 $55,080

Activity 2
How would you describe this state financing activity? Other: School Reimbursement Program
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 190
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 75
C. Total Served 265

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 265
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 00

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

Schools have obligation to provide AT under IDEA.

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 72 $163,423
Hearing 26 $45,072
Speech communication 108 $187,124
Learning, cognition, and developmental 50 $59,198
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 01 $3,159
Vehicle modification and transportation 00 $0
Computers and related 08 $13,740
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 265 $471,716

C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

Assistive technology often unlocks unknown potential, which is exactly what happened when Cutler received his device through the ATR Program. Cutler quickly learned how to independently navigate his device installed with the Prologue2Go app and wasted no time adding phrases to more completely, effectively and robustly help him express his thoughts. Shortly after he obtained his device, it was realized he is a willing and capable writer who is no completing worksheets he previously didn't do and proudly displaying his work along with his classmates' in the hallway. Cutler's parents and his educators report that he made gains this year that would not have been possible without this assistive technology.

Cutler using his AAC device
Impact Area

Jared’s mom was determined to get her son an accessible vehicle after a motor vehicle accident in 2016 left him with a traumatic brain injury. Though she secured more than $38,000 in financing and funding for an accessible vehicle, she was still short of the total needed. Kids Assistive Technology (KAT) funds helped her secure the final funds necessary to purchase Jared’s accessible vehicle. For Jared’s mom, his accessible vehicle means she can safely and securely transport him; for Jared it expands his opportunities.

Jared and his mother in front of accessible vehicle
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 00 00 55 55
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 00 00 55 55
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 00 00 55 55
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 00 00 55 55
9. Performance on this measure NaN% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 53 16.56%
Satisfied 02 0.63%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 265 82.81%
Total Surveyed 320
Response rate % 17.19%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 00
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 2,113
C. Total 2,113

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 2,113

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 00 $0 $0 $0
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 00 $0 $0 $0

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 48 $45,886 $369 $45,517
Hearing 27 $9,146 $170 $8,976
Speech Communication 12 $36,864 $200 $36,664
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 20 $6,940 $250 $6,690
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,405 $513,148 $18,819 $494,329
Daily Living 1,338 $379,881 $14,223 $365,658
Environmental Adaptations 11 $5,084 $310 $4,774
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 07 $4,476 $165 $4,311
Computers and Related 10 $1,860 $75 $1,785
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 04 $215 $0 $215
Total 2,882 $1,003,500 $34,581 $968,919

D. Anecdote

Audrey’s family came to visit Accessibility Medical Equipment (A MoAT partner in the Kansas City region) because they were looking for an affordable powered mobility solution for her. They were unsure if she would be able to operate a power wheelchair, but she wanted to try since she thought it would enable her to safely and effectively be more mobile and independent in her home. Audrey and her family were able to try several different wheelchairs, eventually deciding that the best option was a Pronto power-chair with seat recline. To have purchased a comparable chair new would have cost Audrey several thousand dollars, which would have been unaffordable for her. By purchasing a recycled chair for considerably less, Audrey was able to meet her needs and was “highly satisfied” as a result.

Audrey in her reutilized power wheelchair
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 14 06 1,014 1,034
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 17 05 949 971
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 02 02 88 92
4. Subtotal 33 13 2,051 2,097
5. None of the above 01 00 13 14
6. Subtotal 34 13 2,064 2,111
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
8. Total 35 13 2,065 2,113
9. Performance on this measure 94.29% 100% 99.32%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 1,767 83.63%
Satisfied 341 16.14%
Satisfied somewhat 01 0.05%
Not at all satisfied 02 0.09%
Nonrespondent 02 0.09%
Total Surveyed 2,113
Response rate % 99.91%

G. Notes:

Staff changes at two re-use locations and a sharp reduction in the number of power wheelchairs recycled this year has been identified as the cause for the decline in dollars saved consumers.

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 649
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 18
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 00
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 24
Total 691

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 00
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 01
Representative of Education 485
Representative of Employment 02
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 117
Representatives of Community Living 86
Representatives of Technology 00
Total 691

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 42

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 175
Hearing 65
Speech Communication 859
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 290
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 01
Daily Living 42
Environmental Adaptations 152
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 02
Computers and Related 406
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total 1,992

E. Anecdote

On several occasions during the past year, The City of St. Louis Office on the Disabled sought guidance from MoAT and borrowed items from the device loan program to help identify solutions for employees who were struggling to effectively do their job due to disability. Devices borrowed included adapted keyboards, adapted mice, and in-line phone amplifiers. In each instance, the appropriate solution was identified, which led to the device being purchased by the city and the individuals being able of perform their assigned duties.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 369 14 72 455
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 160 09 16 185
Subtotal 529 23 88 640
Have not made a decision 07 00 02 09
Subtotal 536 23 90 649
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 536 23 90 649
Performance on this measure 98.69% 100% 97.78%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 03 00 00 03
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 20 01 18 39
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 23 01 18 42
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 23 01 18 42
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 23 01 18 42
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 640 92.62%
Satisfied 47 6.8%
Satisfied somewhat 03 0.43%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.14%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 691
Response rate % 100%

I. Notes:

MoAT's current loan policy is for six-week loans (42 days). The policy was changed effective October 1st, 2019 to five-week loans (35 days)

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 144
Hearing 934
Speech Communication 19
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 07
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 371
Daily Living 385
Environmental Adaptations 35
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 04
Computers and Related 61
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 14
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 1,974

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 1,722
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 538
Representatives of Education 44
Representatives of Employment 29
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 57
Representative of Community Living 58
Representative of Technology 02
Total 2,450

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 225
Service Provider 521
Vendor 189
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 935

D. Anecdote

Denise visited MoAT partner empower:abilities in Springfield to explore assistive devices that could help her overcome the issues she was experiencing due to Essential Tremors. Many individuals who have tremors report that eating independently is extremely difficult. Staff from empower:abilities showed Denise an array of adapted eating utensils, compared their features and let her try them out. The S’up spoon (pictured) worked PERFECTLY for Denise who left the demonstration a knowledgeable and informed consumer.

Denise using the S'up adapted eating utensil
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 64 42 1,810 1,916
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 02 52 54
Subtotal 64 44 1,862 1,970
Have not made a decision 00 00 04 04
Subtotal 64 44 1,866 1,974
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 64 44 1,866 1,974
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.79%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 2,306 94.12%
Satisfied 132 5.39%
Satisfied somewhat 08 0.33%
Not at all satisfied 01 0.04%
Nonrespondent 03 0.12%
Total 2,450
Response rate % 99.88%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 17 06 1,069 1,092
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 37 06 967 1,010
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 02 02 88 92
4. Subtotal 56 14 2,124 2,194
5. None of the above 01 00 13 14
6. Subtotal 57 14 2,137 2,208
7. Nonrespondent 01 00 01 02
8. Total 58 14 2,138 2,210
9. Performance on this measure 93.1% 85.71% 95.23% 95.11%
ACL Performance Measure 85%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 433 56 1,882 2,371
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 160 11 68 239
Subtotal 593 67 1,950 2,610
Have not made a decision 07 00 06 13
Subtotal 600 67 1,956 2,623
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 600 67 1,956 2,623
Performance on this measure 98.83% 100% 99.69% 99.5%
ACL Performance Measure 90%
Met/Not Met Met

Overall Satisfaction Rating

Customer Rating of Services Percent ACL Target Met/Not Met
Highly satisfied and satisfied 99.70% 95% Met
Response Rate 95.16% 90% Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 1,168
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 129
Representatives of Education 1,199
Representatives of Employment 120
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 725
Representatives of Community Living 906
Representatives of Technology 55
Unable to Categorize 42
TOTAL 4,344

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
3,115 1,191 38 4,344

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 2,209
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 501
Combination of any/all of the above 1,446
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 55
Transition 133
Total 4,344

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

In February of 2019, Missouri’s Division of Developmental Disabilities announced that it was becoming a Technology First state in which the emphasis was to look at technology first when assisting individuals with developmental disabilities in the community. This opened multiple opportunities for MoAT to work with and compliment that Division’s initiative in the form of training to regional center staff, SB-40 Boards and the like on a variety of assistive technology topics. Approximately 250 individuals have been reached related to this activity.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

MoAT has re-sharpened its focus on the issue of K-12 students who use AT and those who may need AT in the post K-12 receiving environment being adequately preparing to transition with AT and/or identifying the AT they will need in the receiving environment. Three trainings, 2 to educators and 1 to students, on this subject were held this past year with approximately 100 attendees.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

In addition to the annual strand devoted to ICT at our Power Up Conference, MoAT has developed a Word Accessibility Training and is working on a Power Point accessibility training that has been given to state employees developing content for state websites. Two sessions of the Word Accessibility Training were provided in July to state employees with roughly 35 in attendance.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 11
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 30
No known outcome at this time 14
Nonrespondent 00
Total 55
Performance Measure Percentage 74.5%
ACL Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 50%
Employment 0%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 0%
Community Living 50%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 0%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Missouri's state schools for the severely disabled struggle to identify appropriate devices and incorporate them into the learning environment. MoAT has been providing intensive assistance to one state school in which all students are being assessed for AT, provided help in obtaining devices, trained on usage, etc. In addition, educators and support staff are being provided training and guidance on the devices and ways to incorporate them into day-to-day activities. From this intensive endeavor an AT guide and curriculum that can be utilized by other state schools will be developed and disseminated.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

Missouri's Money Follows the Person Program continues to offer transitioning individuals the chance to obtain assistive devices deemed necessary for a successful transition. MoAT staff continue to provide an array of technical guidance activities to transition coordinators ranging from AT assessments,to vendor identification, to development of materials.

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. As part of it's work in ICT issues, MoAT developed a 10-part Information Communication Technology Video Series that highlighted AT users and why web accessibility matters to them. The series was posted to YouTube as a means of distribution and has received 373 views.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 2,448 593 3,041
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 611 357 968
Representative of Education 1,553 09 1,562
Representative of Employment 100 25 125
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 894 24 918
Representative of Community Living 3,112 51 3,163
Representative of Technology 80 08 88
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 8,798 1,067 9,865

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Public/State Agency$1,613,059Demonstration
Public/State Agency$100,000State Financing
Public/State Agency$500,000State Financing
Federal$224,534State Financing
Amount: $2,437,593

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 09 2020 08:43:53 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY19 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.