Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 28 | 09 | 37 |
Approved Not made | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Rejected | 00 | 01 | 01 |
Total | 28 | 11 | 39 |
Lowest Income: | $9,000 | Highest Income: | $152,190 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$2,060,759 | 37 | $55,696 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 07 | 07 | 03 | 09 | 03 | 08 | 37 |
Percentage of Loans | 18.92% | 18.92% | 8.11% | 24.32% | 8.11% | 21.62% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 37 | 100% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 37 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 37 | $287,974 |
Partnership Loans | 00 | $0 |
Total | 37 | $287,974 |
Lowest | 1% |
---|---|
Highest | 4% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
124 | 37 | 3.35135135135135% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 08 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 29 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 37 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 02 | $4,698 |
Hearing | 13 | $52,841 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 01 | $575 |
Environmental adaptations | 09 | $51,530 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 12 | $178,330 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 37 | $287,974 |
Number Loans in default | 03 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $5,460 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 02 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | last resort activity |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 08 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 10 |
C. Total Served | 18 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 18 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 01 | $5,875 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 02 | $3,833 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 08 | $16,076 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 04 | $16,028 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 02 | $11,673 |
Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 01 | $1,595 |
Total | 18 | $55,080 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: School Reimbursement Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 190 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 75 |
C. Total Served | 265 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 265 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 00 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Schools have obligation to provide AT under IDEA.
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 72 | $163,423 |
Hearing | 26 | $45,072 |
Speech communication | 108 | $187,124 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 50 | $59,198 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 01 | $3,159 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 08 | $13,740 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 265 | $471,716 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
Assistive technology often unlocks unknown potential, which is exactly what happened when Cutler received his device through the ATR Program. Cutler quickly learned how to independently navigate his device installed with the Prologue2Go app and wasted no time adding phrases to more completely, effectively and robustly help him express his thoughts. Shortly after he obtained his device, it was realized he is a willing and capable writer who is no completing worksheets he previously didn't do and proudly displaying his work along with his classmates' in the hallway. Cutler's parents and his educators report that he made gains this year that would not have been possible without this assistive technology.
Jared’s mom was determined to get her son an accessible vehicle after a motor vehicle accident in 2016 left him with a traumatic brain injury. Though she secured more than $38,000 in financing and funding for an accessible vehicle, she was still short of the total needed. Kids Assistive Technology (KAT) funds helped her secure the final funds necessary to purchase Jared’s accessible vehicle. For Jared’s mom, his accessible vehicle means she can safely and securely transport him; for Jared it expands his opportunities.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 55 | 55 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 55 | 55 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 55 | 55 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 55 | 55 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 53 | 16.56% |
Satisfied | 02 | 0.63% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 265 | 82.81% |
Total Surveyed | 320 | |
Response rate % | 17.19% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,113 |
C. Total | 2,113 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,113 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 48 | $45,886 | $369 | $45,517 |
Hearing | 27 | $9,146 | $170 | $8,976 |
Speech Communication | 12 | $36,864 | $200 | $36,664 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 20 | $6,940 | $250 | $6,690 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 1,405 | $513,148 | $18,819 | $494,329 |
Daily Living | 1,338 | $379,881 | $14,223 | $365,658 |
Environmental Adaptations | 11 | $5,084 | $310 | $4,774 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 07 | $4,476 | $165 | $4,311 |
Computers and Related | 10 | $1,860 | $75 | $1,785 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | $215 | $0 | $215 |
Total | 2,882 | $1,003,500 | $34,581 | $968,919 |
Audrey’s family came to visit Accessibility Medical Equipment (A MoAT partner in the Kansas City region) because they were looking for an affordable powered mobility solution for her. They were unsure if she would be able to operate a power wheelchair, but she wanted to try since she thought it would enable her to safely and effectively be more mobile and independent in her home. Audrey and her family were able to try several different wheelchairs, eventually deciding that the best option was a Pronto power-chair with seat recline. To have purchased a comparable chair new would have cost Audrey several thousand dollars, which would have been unaffordable for her. By purchasing a recycled chair for considerably less, Audrey was able to meet her needs and was “highly satisfied” as a result.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 14 | 06 | 1,014 | 1,034 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 17 | 05 | 949 | 971 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 02 | 88 | 92 |
4. Subtotal | 33 | 13 | 2,051 | 2,097 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
6. Subtotal | 34 | 13 | 2,064 | 2,111 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
8. Total | 35 | 13 | 2,065 | 2,113 |
9. Performance on this measure | 94.29% | 100% | 99.32% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 1,767 | 83.63% |
Satisfied | 341 | 16.14% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.05% |
Not at all satisfied | 02 | 0.09% |
Nonrespondent | 02 | 0.09% |
Total Surveyed | 2,113 | |
Response rate % | 99.91% |
Staff changes at two re-use locations and a sharp reduction in the number of power wheelchairs recycled this year has been identified as the cause for the decline in dollars saved consumers.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 649 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 18 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 00 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 24 |
Total | 691 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 00 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 01 |
Representative of Education | 485 |
Representative of Employment | 02 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 117 |
Representatives of Community Living | 86 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Total | 691 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 42 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 175 |
Hearing | 65 |
Speech Communication | 859 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 290 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 01 |
Daily Living | 42 |
Environmental Adaptations | 152 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 02 |
Computers and Related | 406 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total | 1,992 |
On several occasions during the past year, The City of St. Louis Office on the Disabled sought guidance from MoAT and borrowed items from the device loan program to help identify solutions for employees who were struggling to effectively do their job due to disability. Devices borrowed included adapted keyboards, adapted mice, and in-line phone amplifiers. In each instance, the appropriate solution was identified, which led to the device being purchased by the city and the individuals being able of perform their assigned duties.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 369 | 14 | 72 | 455 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 160 | 09 | 16 | 185 |
Subtotal | 529 | 23 | 88 | 640 |
Have not made a decision | 07 | 00 | 02 | 09 |
Subtotal | 536 | 23 | 90 | 649 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 536 | 23 | 90 | 649 |
Performance on this measure | 98.69% | 100% | 97.78% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 00 | 03 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 20 | 01 | 18 | 39 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 23 | 01 | 18 | 42 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 23 | 01 | 18 | 42 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 23 | 01 | 18 | 42 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 640 | 92.62% |
Satisfied | 47 | 6.8% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.43% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.14% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 691 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
MoAT's current loan policy is for six-week loans (42 days). The policy was changed effective October 1st, 2019 to five-week loans (35 days)
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 144 |
Hearing | 934 |
Speech Communication | 19 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 371 |
Daily Living | 385 |
Environmental Adaptations | 35 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 04 |
Computers and Related | 61 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 14 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 1,974 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,722 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 538 |
Representatives of Education | 44 |
Representatives of Employment | 29 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 57 |
Representative of Community Living | 58 |
Representative of Technology | 02 |
Total | 2,450 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 225 |
Service Provider | 521 |
Vendor | 189 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 935 |
Denise visited MoAT partner empower:abilities in Springfield to explore assistive devices that could help her overcome the issues she was experiencing due to Essential Tremors. Many individuals who have tremors report that eating independently is extremely difficult. Staff from empower:abilities showed Denise an array of adapted eating utensils, compared their features and let her try them out. The S’up spoon (pictured) worked PERFECTLY for Denise who left the demonstration a knowledgeable and informed consumer.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 64 | 42 | 1,810 | 1,916 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 02 | 52 | 54 |
Subtotal | 64 | 44 | 1,862 | 1,970 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
Subtotal | 64 | 44 | 1,866 | 1,974 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 64 | 44 | 1,866 | 1,974 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.79% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,306 | 94.12% |
Satisfied | 132 | 5.39% |
Satisfied somewhat | 08 | 0.33% |
Not at all satisfied | 01 | 0.04% |
Nonrespondent | 03 | 0.12% |
Total | 2,450 | |
Response rate % | 99.88% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 17 | 06 | 1,069 | 1,092 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 37 | 06 | 967 | 1,010 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 02 | 88 | 92 |
4. Subtotal | 56 | 14 | 2,124 | 2,194 |
5. None of the above | 01 | 00 | 13 | 14 |
6. Subtotal | 57 | 14 | 2,137 | 2,208 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
8. Total | 58 | 14 | 2,138 | 2,210 |
9. Performance on this measure | 93.1% | 85.71% | 95.23% | 95.11% |
ACL Performance Measure | 85% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 433 | 56 | 1,882 | 2,371 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 160 | 11 | 68 | 239 |
Subtotal | 593 | 67 | 1,950 | 2,610 |
Have not made a decision | 07 | 00 | 06 | 13 |
Subtotal | 600 | 67 | 1,956 | 2,623 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 600 | 67 | 1,956 | 2,623 |
Performance on this measure | 98.83% | 100% | 99.69% | 99.5% |
ACL Performance Measure | 90% | |||
Met/Not Met | Met |
Customer Rating of Services | Percent | ACL Target | Met/Not Met |
---|---|---|---|
Highly satisfied and satisfied | 99.70% | 95% | Met |
Response Rate | 95.16% | 90% | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 1,168 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 129 |
Representatives of Education | 1,199 |
Representatives of Employment | 120 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 725 |
Representatives of Community Living | 906 |
Representatives of Technology | 55 |
Unable to Categorize | 42 |
TOTAL | 4,344 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
3,115 | 1,191 | 38 | 4,344 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 2,209 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 501 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 1,446 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 55 |
Transition | 133 |
Total | 4,344 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
In February of 2019, Missouri’s Division of Developmental Disabilities announced that it was becoming a Technology First state in which the emphasis was to look at technology first when assisting individuals with developmental disabilities in the community. This opened multiple opportunities for MoAT to work with and compliment that Division’s initiative in the form of training to regional center staff, SB-40 Boards and the like on a variety of assistive technology topics. Approximately 250 individuals have been reached related to this activity.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
MoAT has re-sharpened its focus on the issue of K-12 students who use AT and those who may need AT in the post K-12 receiving environment being adequately preparing to transition with AT and/or identifying the AT they will need in the receiving environment. Three trainings, 2 to educators and 1 to students, on this subject were held this past year with approximately 100 attendees.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
In addition to the annual strand devoted to ICT at our Power Up Conference, MoAT has developed a Word Accessibility Training and is working on a Power Point accessibility training that has been given to state employees developing content for state websites. Two sessions of the Word Accessibility Training were provided in July to state employees with roughly 35 in attendance.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 11 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 30 |
No known outcome at this time | 14 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 55 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 74.5% |
ACL Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 50% |
---|---|
Employment | 0% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 50% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Missouri's state schools for the severely disabled struggle to identify appropriate devices and incorporate them into the learning environment. MoAT has been providing intensive assistance to one state school in which all students are being assessed for AT, provided help in obtaining devices, trained on usage, etc. In addition, educators and support staff are being provided training and guidance on the devices and ways to incorporate them into day-to-day activities. From this intensive endeavor an AT guide and curriculum that can be utilized by other state schools will be developed and disseminated.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Missouri's Money Follows the Person Program continues to offer transitioning individuals the chance to obtain assistive devices deemed necessary for a successful transition. MoAT staff continue to provide an array of technical guidance activities to transition coordinators ranging from AT assessments,to vendor identification, to development of materials.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. As part of it's work in ICT issues, MoAT developed a 10-part Information Communication Technology Video Series that highlighted AT users and why web accessibility matters to them. The series was posted to YouTube as a means of distribution and has received 373 views.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 2,448 | 593 | 3,041 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 611 | 357 | 968 |
Representative of Education | 1,553 | 09 | 1,562 |
Representative of Employment | 100 | 25 | 125 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 894 | 24 | 918 |
Representative of Community Living | 3,112 | 51 | 3,163 |
Representative of Technology | 80 | 08 | 88 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 8,798 | 1,067 | 9,865 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $1,613,059 | Demonstration |
Public/State Agency | $100,000 | State Financing |
Public/State Agency | $500,000 | State Financing |
Federal | $224,534 | State Financing |
Amount: $2,437,593 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance . Saved: Mon Mar 09 2020 08:43:53 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)