National Assistive Technology Act Data System
Annual Progress Report - Full Report
Nebraska 2018
General Information
Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)
Lead Agency
Implementing Entity
Program Director and Other Contacts
Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director
Certifying Representative
State Financing
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
|---|---|
| Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
| Area of Residence | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
| Approved Loan made | 03 | 01 | 04 |
| Approved Not made | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Rejected | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 03 | 01 | 04 |
2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made
| Lowest Income: | $13,140 | Highest Income: | $130,308 |
|---|
| Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
|---|---|---|
| $217,116 | 04 | $54,279 |
| Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
| Number of Loans | 01 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
| Percentage of Loans | 25% | 25% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 25% | 100% |
3. Loan Type
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | 0% |
| Partnership Loans | ||
| Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
| With interest buy-down only | 00 | 0% |
| With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
| With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 04 | 100% |
| Total | 04 | 100% |
| Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Revolving Loans | 00 | $0 |
| Partnership Loans | 04 | $49,183 |
| Total | 04 | $49,183 |
4. Interest Rates
| Lowest | 4% |
|---|---|
| Highest | 4% |
| Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | 04 | 4% |
| Interest Rate | Number of loans |
|---|---|
| 0.0% to 2.0% | 00 |
| 2.1% to 4.0% | 04 |
| 4.1% to 6.0% | 00 |
| 6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
| 8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
| 10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
| 12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
| 14.1% + | 00 |
| Total | 04 |
5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
| Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 01 | $1,683 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 01 | $17,500 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 02 | $30,000 |
| Computers and related | 00 | $0 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 04 | $49,183 |
6. Defaults
| Number Loans in default | 00 |
|---|---|
| Net loss for loans in default | $0 |
B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 02 |
|---|
Activity 1
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | telecommunications distribution |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 10 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 06 |
| C. Total Served | 16 |
| Performance Measure | Number |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 16 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 05 | $7,147 |
| Hearing | 12 | $945 |
| Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
| Daily living | 00 | $0 |
| Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
| Computers and related | 37 | $13,218 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 54 | $21,310 |
Activity 2
| How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Private Grant |
|---|
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
| County of Residence | Individuals Served |
|---|---|
| A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 41 |
| B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 00 |
| C. Total Served | 41 |
| Performance Measure | Number |
|---|---|
| D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
| E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 41 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 |
| Hearing | 01 | $344 |
| Speech communication | 01 | $139 |
| Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
| Mobility, seating and positioning | 04 | $13,609 |
| Daily living | 04 | $9,450 |
| Environmental adaptations | 22 | $97,312 |
| Vehicle modification and transportation | 13 | $87,670 |
| Computers and related | 01 | $658 |
| Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
| Total | 46 | $209,182 |
C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost
1. Overview of Activities Performed
| How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
|---|
D. Anecdote
P is an 83-year-old female who experiences arthritis, high blood pressure, and leg cramping. She was recently hit by a car and broke some ribs, her sternum, and an arm. P has difficulty walking due to the arthritis in her back and uses a walker or cane for short distances. She is only able to lift her leg 2” to 3” off the ground. A recent diagnosis of thyroid and lung cancer have caused her to need a wheelchair when out in the community and on days she is feeling weak. A request was sent to ATP by P and her husband to have their bathroom modified to make it more accessible. ATP recommended widening the doorway to 36”, changing the door swing, installing a roll under sink, new toilet with fold down grab bars, and a roll in shower. Funding for this project came from the Enrichment Foundation Grant ($5,661.25), a HISA grant since her husband suffers from service related injuries ($2,000), and Part B Independent Living funds ($5,537.75). Because of ATP’s recommendations, project oversight, and funding coordination P and her husband are able to safely access their bathroom and remain independent in their community.
i Can Connect (ICC) is Nebraska's Deaf Blind Equipment Distribution program. It helps people with a combined vision and hearing loss obtain telecommunication equipment. Our iCC technology specialists worked with a younger individual who is in school and is diagnosed with Bilirubin Encephalopathy. This diagnosis resulted in profound deafness and they also require glasses to help with vision. When outside in the sunlight they become totally blind and they are sensitive to fluorescent lights. They receive accommodations through their school, but the technology was only for school use and was not available for personal use. This individual was provided an iPad through the iCC Program for personal use to be able to send emails, text messages and FaceTime with family and friends. A case and AppleCare were also provided to ensure the technology would be safe for long term use. This individual was also able to benefit from bone conduction headphones to help with hearing on the iPad and other Bluetooth compatible devices. These devices have allowed the client to be able to independently telecommunicate with others.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 11 | 27 | 38 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 01 | 17 | 18 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
| 4. Subtotal | 00 | 12 | 45 | 57 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 6. Subtotal | 00 | 12 | 47 | 59 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 8. Total | 00 | 12 | 49 | 61 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | 100% | 91.84% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 51 | 83.61% |
| Satisfied | 05 | 8.2% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 1.64% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 04 | 6.56% |
| Total Surveyed | 61 | |
| Response rate % | 93.44% |
G. Notes:
Reutilization
A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices
| Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
|---|---|
| A. Device Exchange | 27 |
| B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 554 |
| C. Total | 581 |
| Performance Measure | |
|---|---|
| D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
| E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
| F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 581 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
B. Device Exchange Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 11 | $16,395 | $175 | $16,220 |
| Daily Living | 11 | $9,085 | $2,425 | $6,660 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 02 | $6,649 | $0 | $6,649 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 03 | $85,869 | $100 | $85,769 |
| Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Total | 27 | $117,998 | $2,700 | $115,298 |
C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities
| Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision | 13 | $8,243 | $0 | $8,243 |
| Hearing | 29 | $4,922 | $0 | $4,922 |
| Speech Communication | 07 | $17,292 | $0 | $17,292 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 06 | $425 | $0 | $425 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 204 | $137,294 | $0 | $137,294 |
| Daily Living | 243 | $29,964 | $0 | $29,964 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 18 | $6,924 | $0 | $6,924 |
| Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 04 | $5,955 | $0 | $5,955 |
| Computers and Related | 26 | $6,727 | $0 | $6,727 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 04 | $704 | $0 | $704 |
| Total | 554 | $218,450 | $0 | $218,450 |
D. Anecdote
In April 2018, the Reuse Network in Nebraska hosted the Lose it and Reuse it: Medical Equipment Exchange event in Omaha. The Reuse Network gave away 305.43 lbs of donated equipment to community members, and countless more has been added to the inventory at partner organizations – extending its use and preventing it from ending up in Nebraska landfills. This also resulted in a cost savings of approximately $5,766.53 for these individuals and their families – based on estimated current retail price of the used equipment. 14 volunteers including agency representatives, family members, coworkers, etc. assisted in making the equipment exchanges seamless. There were many individual success stories to share: the young lady whose insurance would not cover the cost of her manual wheelchair was able to find a chair that fit and was able to be adjusted and modified by a licensed OT partner; a parent who was able to find a reclining, belted shower chair for her adult child to bathe safely and comfortably and safely; a family found a manual wheelchair, wheelchair cushion, and toilet riser for their father preparing to exit a rehabilitation facility; a woman who donated her commode that didn’t quite fit, was able to swap hers out for one that was just right; there was the reuse partner who found a perfect condition stair lift for his neighbor’s family member to regain safe access to their homes; a representative of a parent organization donated several pediatric items and turned around to pick up a Kid Walk for another family in her group; the numerous CPAP machines donated for which a licensed RT partner is able to refurbish and donate back out to those in need.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 42 | 18 | 291 | 351 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 12 | 19 | 115 | 146 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 05 | 03 | 66 | 74 |
| 4. Subtotal | 59 | 40 | 472 | 571 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 07 | 01 | 10 |
| 6. Subtotal | 61 | 47 | 473 | 581 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 61 | 47 | 473 | 581 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 96.72% | 85.11% | 99.79% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 543 | 93.46% |
| Satisfied | 29 | 4.99% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 05 | 0.86% |
| Not at all satisfied | 04 | 0.69% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 581 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Device Loan
A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose
| Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
|---|---|
| Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 465 |
| Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 36 |
| Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 445 |
| Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 18 |
| Total | 964 |
B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower
| Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 165 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 376 |
| Representative of Education | 300 |
| Representative of Employment | 25 |
| Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 62 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 24 |
| Representatives of Technology | 12 |
| Total | 964 |
C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans
| Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 30 |
|---|
D. Types of Devices Loaned
| Type of AT Device | Number |
|---|---|
| Vision | 18 |
| Hearing | 57 |
| Speech Communication | 74 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 352 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 338 |
| Daily Living | 258 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 149 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 05 |
| Computers and Related | 124 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 08 |
| Total | 1,383 |
E. Anecdote
Over the summer months, while a young student was home from school in western Nebraska the family identified their need for an EasyPivot Patient Lift Transfer Aide for her care attendant to assist with transfers while home. Previously a parent had been home for the summer, and while she was smaller in stature the parent was able to assist. This summer the need for the Transfer Aide became apparent. While at school, the young lady had access to an EasyPivot Patient Lift Transfer Aide, but the family was without home resources. The family found the loan device on AT4ALL.com, requesting its use over the summer. Staff accommodated this request, approving the extension of the loan beyond established program policy guidelines. A family member was able to pick up the lift in Omaha using their previously modified vehicle, as this is a large piece of equipment. Throughout the course of these conversations to coordinate the loan, a patient lift transfer aide became available for sale in another community. Staff assisted with connecting both parties to assist in the exchange. The loan was ultimately returned within 30 days and the family has a patient lift transfer aide for their home use on a permanent basis.
F. Access Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 272 | 67 | 32 | 371 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 28 | 20 | 09 | 57 |
| Subtotal | 300 | 87 | 41 | 428 |
| Have not made a decision | 34 | 00 | 03 | 37 |
| Subtotal | 334 | 87 | 44 | 465 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 334 | 87 | 44 | 465 |
| Performance on this measure | 89.82% | 100% | 93.18% | |
G. Acquisition Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 42 | 07 | 323 | 372 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 17 | 16 | 72 | 105 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 08 | 13 | 22 |
| 4. Subtotal | 60 | 31 | 408 | 499 |
| 5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 6. Subtotal | 60 | 31 | 408 | 499 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| 8. Total | 60 | 31 | 408 | 499 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
H. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 882 | 91.49% |
| Satisfied | 78 | 8.09% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 04 | 0.41% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total Surveyed | 964 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
I. Notes:
Device Demonstration
A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type
| Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
|---|---|
| Vision | 01 |
| Hearing | 15 |
| Speech Communication | 00 |
| Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 26 |
| Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 |
| Daily Living | 12 |
| Environmental Adaptations | 03 |
| Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
| Computers and Related | 25 |
| Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
| Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 91 |
B. Types of Participants
| Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 126 |
| Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 37 |
| Representatives of Education | 91 |
| Representatives of Employment | 23 |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 140 |
| Representative of Community Living | 00 |
| Representative of Technology | 21 |
| Total | 438 |
C. Number of Referrals
| Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
|---|---|
| Funding Source (non-AT program) | 279 |
| Service Provider | 03 |
| Vendor | 02 |
| Repair Service | 00 |
| Others | 00 |
| Total | 284 |
D. Anecdote
J is a high school student and is diagnosed with profound deafness. He is pursuing an EMT course through the local Community College in Norfolk, NE and needed a specialized stethoscope in order to hear clearly. He worked with ATP and the AT4ALL website to compare different stethoscopes until he found a ThinkLabs One Digital Stethoscope that was compatible with his cochlear implant. Jared is a NE VR Pre-ETS student, so NE VR was unable to fund the AT equipment recommended, however Jared completed a Service & Device application and through ATP funding coordination was able to find funding assistance through Part B funds to purchase a stethoscope like the one demonstrated and loaned to him. Jared and his family were also able to contribute financially to the cost of the stethoscope. He plans to become a Certified Emergency Medical Technician and after graduation from high school, continue his training to become licensed as a paramedic. The stethoscope obtained will allow him to be successful in this career field as well as the training along the way.
E. Performance Measures
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 15 | 46 | 08 | 69 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 14 | 04 | 18 |
| Subtotal | 15 | 60 | 12 | 87 |
| Have not made a decision | 04 | 00 | 00 | 04 |
| Subtotal | 19 | 60 | 12 | 91 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 19 | 60 | 12 | 91 |
| Performance on this measure | 78.95% | 100% | 100% | |
F. Customer Satisfaction
| Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Highly satisfied | 438 | 100% |
| Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
| Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
| Total | 438 | |
| Response rate % | 100% |
G. Notes:
Overall Performance Measures
Overall Acquisition Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| 1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 84 | 36 | 641 | 761 |
| 2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 29 | 36 | 204 | 269 |
| 3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 06 | 11 | 80 | 97 |
| 4. Subtotal | 119 | 83 | 925 | 1,127 |
| 5. None of the above | 02 | 07 | 03 | 12 |
| 6. Subtotal | 121 | 90 | 928 | 1,139 |
| 7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
| 8. Total | 121 | 90 | 930 | 1,141 |
| 9. Performance on this measure | 98.35% | 92.22% | 99.46% | 98.77% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
| Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Overall Access Performance Measure
| Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
| Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 287 | 113 | 40 | 440 |
| Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 28 | 34 | 13 | 75 |
| Subtotal | 315 | 147 | 53 | 515 |
| Have not made a decision | 38 | 00 | 03 | 41 |
| Subtotal | 353 | 147 | 56 | 556 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
| Total | 353 | 147 | 56 | 556 |
| Performance on this measure | 89.24% | 100% | 94.64% | 92.63% |
| ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Training
A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution
| Type of Participant | Number |
|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 99 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 96 |
| Representatives of Education | 562 |
| Representatives of Employment | 44 |
| Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 49 |
| Representatives of Community Living | 13 |
| Representatives of Technology | 02 |
| Unable to Categorize | 34 |
| TOTAL | 899 |
| Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 581 | 318 | 00 | 899 |
B. Training Topics
| Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
|---|---|
| AT Products/Services | 579 |
| AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 42 |
| Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 00 |
| Combination of any/all of the above | 91 |
| Transition | 187 |
| Total | 899 |
B. Description of Training Activities
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
ATP was asked by the Nebraska Safety Council to provide a training to rural transit drivers on different types of manual and power wheelchairs as part of a wheelchair tie down training the drivers were going through. One of ATP's ReUse partners who is a licensed Physical Therapist was asked to attend along with a staff member from ATP. The two provided training on various types of manual and power wheelchairs to the 13 drivers that came in from their rural communities. The drivers were able to come up and look over the various types of wheelchairs that were brought as visual aids. Because of this training, these drivers are now more comfortable working with different types of manual and power wheelchairs.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
ATP was asked to provide a training to an introduction to Special Education class at the University of Nebraska. ATP staff presented to 40 students on different types of AT and their uses. They also covered regulations surrounding assistive technology in the school system and how to incorporate AT into an IEP. Various activities were done with the students to help increase their comfort level when using AT. How to obtain AT in Nebraska was also discussed and different resources on AT were shared. The students left the training with a better understanding of assistive technology and how to obtain it.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
| Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
|---|---|
| IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 00 |
| Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
| No known outcome at this time | 00 |
| Nonrespondent | 00 |
| Total | 00 |
| Performance Measure Percentage | NaN% |
| RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
| Met/Not Met | Not Met |
E. Notes:
During FY 18, ATP continued to promote webinars related to IT accessibility training on their website and calendar. The following were promoted: Section 508 Best Practices Webinar (Great Lakes ADA) Tools Tips and Tricks on Mobile Web Platforms (Accessibility On-line) Web Accessibility (Easter Seals) AT Trends (Center on Technology/Disability) Creative Technology for Inclusion/Engagement (CTD Institute) These were listed on our website and promoted through Constant Contact (email). ATP does not have a way to know if our marketing efforts were successful which is reflected in the lack of participant data in the IT/Telecommunications Training and Performance Measure.
Technical Assistance
A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance
| Education | 95% |
|---|---|
| Employment | 0% |
| Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
| Community Living | 5% |
| Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
| Total | 100% |
B. Description of Technical Assistance
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
ATP was contacted by an elementary school in Grand Island NE for technical assistance on a new playground they were installing. The school was provided with a layout for the equipment by the vendor, but the plans did not take into account factors such as drainage, other playground equipment, property infrastructure such as underground piping, utility access covers etc. Also, playground equipment vendors do not typically meet the students with special needs or get input from school specialists such as a physical and occupational therapists. The architect ended up rotating the playground 90 degrees due to the placement of the storm drainage metal grates. This change to the original layout resulted in the accessible route to the equipment overlapping with the basketball court hoops. After consulting with the U.S. Access Board the ATP staff and the school personnel developed a plan to address the access and safety issues by relocating the basketball hoop, marking the accessible route on th
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Central Valley High School contacted the ATP Program Coordinator to review green house kit plans and specifications before they placed the order. ADA considerations included accessible route from the main high school building to the proposed greenhouse site, width of entry door, floor size and arrangement of interior growing benches and work table to allow an accessible work space. During a site visit in March, 2018, the greenhouse was installed outside the career education wing of the high school on the side of the parking lot; door threshold modifications were suggested and growing bench product information was reviewed. The SPED teacher showed a switch adapted garden sprayer the district purchased from Enabling Devices which allowed all students to help with plant care.
C. Notes:
Public Awareness
Public Awareness Activities
Public Awareness Narratives
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. The Nebraska Educational Technology Association held its spring conference at the CenturyLink Center in Omaha on April 19-20, 2018. There were over 2,000 conference attendees from across Nebraska and the region. The Assistive Technology Partnership (ATP) provided an informational table in the exhibitor area on both Thursday and Friday where educators could find information about the ATP-Education program and also interact with a few AT devices. Approximately 150 visitors stopped by the table for more information. On Friday, ATP-Education also presented an all-day, hands-on session. Attendees were able to spend their time interacting with hundreds of devices and pieces of AT that filled the 1700 square foot room. A PowerPoint explaining the ATP-Education program was showing in the room as participants were able to browse and ask questions. ATP staff answered specific questions about AT devices and services from attendees. Approximately 200 educators visited the interactive Assistive Technology "Playground" throughout the day. This activity gave those teachers a chance to see and interact with various types of assistive technology increasing their level of comfort and knowledge of assistive devices available.
2.
Information And Assistance
| Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individuals with Disabilities | 418 | 225 | 643 |
| Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 205 | 260 | 465 |
| Representative of Education | 312 | 199 | 511 |
| Representative of Employment | 224 | 195 | 419 |
| Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 188 | 240 | 428 |
| Representative of Community Living | 157 | 38 | 195 |
| Representative of Technology | 204 | 236 | 440 |
| Unable to Categorize | 132 | 26 | 158 |
| Total | 1,840 | 1,419 | 3,259 |
Notes:
State Improvement Outcomes
| State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
|---|
A. State Improvements
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
B. State Improvements
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Additional And Leveraged Funds
Additional and Leveraged Funds
| Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
|---|
A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
|---|---|---|
| Public/State Agency | $83,736 | Training |
| Federal | $87,436 | Technical Assistance |
| Private | $225,000 | State Financing |
| Amount: $396,172 |
B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)
| Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
|---|
C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 13:53:19 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)