National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Massachusetts 2018

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Massachusetts Maximizing Assistive Technology in Consumers' Hands (MassMATCH)
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
www.massmatch.org
Mailing Address:
600 Washington Street
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02111
Program Email:
info@massmatch.org
Phone:
877-508-3974
TTY:
617-204-3815

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission
Mailing Address:
600 Washington Street
City:
Boston
State:
MA
Zip Code:
02111
Program URL:
www.mass.gov/orgs/massachusetts-rehabilitation-commission

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Shor, Ann
Title:
Director, Independent Living/Assistive Technology
Phone:
617-204-3602
E-mail:
ann.shor@massmail.state.ma.us
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
MassMATCH Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@massmail.state.ma.us
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Bonney, Kobena
Title:
MassMATCH Program Coordinator
Phone:
617-204-3826
E-mail:
kobena.bonney@massmail.state.ma.us

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Wolf, Toni
Title:
Commissioner
Phone:
617-204-3600
E-mail:
toni.wolf@massmail.state.ma.us

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 35 00 35
Approved Not made 00 00 00
Rejected 00 00 00
Total 35 00 35

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $8,568 Highest Income: $258,743

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$1,541,077 35 $44,031

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 10 10 03 02 02 08 35
Percentage of Loans 28.57% 28.57% 8.57% 5.71% 5.71% 22.86% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 00 0%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 13 37.14%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 22 62.86%
Total 35 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 00 $0
Partnership Loans 35 $527,591
Total 35 $527,591

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 3.75%
Highest 3.75%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
131 35 3.75428571428571%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 00
2.1% to 4.0% 35
4.1% to 6.0% 00
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 35

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 06 $18,901
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 04 $6,771
Daily living 01 $2,131
Environmental adaptations 01 $13,180
Vehicle modification and transportation 21 $484,858
Computers and related 02 $1,750
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 35 $527,591

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 00
Net loss for loans in default $0

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 00


C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

Jose and Sophia applied to the Financial Loan Program in hopes of being able to support their brother with his mobility needs. They were in a desperate search for a way to get a stair lift in their home, as they could no longer help their brother up and down a flight of stairs. In fear of having to move as a result of their daily struggles, they searched for a way to be able to afford the expensive adaptation to their home. The three siblings found a company to assess their home and provide them with a detailed estimate for the purchase and installation of the lift. They were able to use this for the loan application, which was approved. As a result, Jose and Sophia were able to provide their brother with a lift in their home, allowing them all to stay in their home and giving their brother the independence to move around at his own leisure.

Impact Area

Barbara is 55 years old and lives in an elderly housing community as a result of her multiple disabilities. A presentation was given by AT Loan staff at Barbara’s housing complex, which she was initially hesitant to attend, but was encouraged by the housing coordinator to be a part of. After the presentation, Barbara confided in the AT Loan staff about her long history of hospital stays and medical treatments that had left her with significant memory loss. She hoped that the staff could help her find technology that could give her daily reminders for important tasks, such as medication reminders. After the program staff demonstrated various items such as the Amazon Echo and the Google Home and their features, Barbara decided that the Amazon Echo could be a good fit for her, especially with its many other functions other than reminders. Barbara applied for and was approved for a loan, which she used to purchase an Amazon Echo. It was set-up in Barbara’s home and she has been doing very well with it. Barbara is grateful for the support the device has given her. Not only does it give her daily reminders for medications, but it has reduced her stress and anxiety as well. She has also started to explore the other functions that the Echo offers and states that it makes her feel less alone in her apartment.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 01 00 34 35
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 00 00
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 01 00 34 35
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 01 00 34 35
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 01 00 34 35
9. Performance on this measure 100% NaN% 100%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 25 71.43%
Satisfied 09 25.71%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 01 2.86%
Total Surveyed 35
Response rate % 97.14%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 22
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 2,245
C. Total 2,267

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 2,267

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 02 $3,110 $0 $3,110
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 11 $18,975 $1,825 $17,150
Daily Living 03 $2,320 $0 $2,320
Environmental Adaptations 03 $9,400 $600 $8,800
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $12,400 $3,400 $9,000
Computers and Related 02 $105 $0 $105
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 22 $46,310 $5,825 $40,485

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 02 $936 $0 $936
Hearing 54 $17,023 $0 $17,023
Speech Communication 03 $1,101 $0 $1,101
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 01 $479 $0 $479
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 1,629 $1,868,151 $0 $1,868,151
Daily Living 535 $282,555 $0 $282,555
Environmental Adaptations 03 $473 $0 $473
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $1,801 $0 $1,801
Computers and Related 18 $2,884 $0 $2,884
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 2,246 $2,175,403 $0 $2,175,403

D. Anecdote

Ms. F is a 48 year old woman with a physical disability living in Pittsfield. She reported that she was only able to run errands with the assistance of another person because of her gait and feeling unsteady. Her insurance would not cover a rollator and she was on a fixed income and couldn’t afford to buy one. After receiving a rollator walker donated through a donation drive held by REquipment and UCP she reported, “Now I can go out by myself and do errands. I can actually go out for walks now too, and get some much needed exercise.” “It has literally given me my independence back.”

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 73 24 1,357 1,454
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 05 01 35 41
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 52 03 413 468
4. Subtotal 130 28 1,805 1,963
5. None of the above 51 06 243 300
6. Subtotal 181 34 2,048 2,263
7. Nonrespondent 03 00 01 04
8. Total 184 34 2,049 2,267
9. Performance on this measure 70.65% 82.35% 88.09%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 751 33.13%
Satisfied 114 5.03%
Satisfied somewhat 23 1.01%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 1,379 60.83%
Total Surveyed 2,267
Response rate % 39.17%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 495
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 50
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 66
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 95
Total 706

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 149
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 245
Representative of Education 92
Representative of Employment 06
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 90
Representatives of Community Living 07
Representatives of Technology 117
Total 706

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 30

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 162
Hearing 52
Speech Communication 153
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 130
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 61
Daily Living 263
Environmental Adaptations 101
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 444
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 11
Total 1,377

E. Anecdote

Susan K. is a massage therapist and she often needs to read the latest articles in her field. Susan has light sensitivity and visual impairment due to Albinism, but most of these articles are not available in alternative format. Because of her visual impairment, reading visually is fatiguing and difficult for her. She usually takes many breaks to rest her eyes. When Susan heard about the ATRC and the hundreds of devices they have available to borrow for free, she decided to try it out. She went to the center to learn about devices that would not only help her see text larger but would also read text back to her when her eyes felt tired. After being shown a couple of devices, she settled on the Optelec ClearView+ due to the features that the device offers. This device allows the user to see the text in many different sizes, colors and has the added feature of reading the text out loud with a selection of various electronic voices. With this device Susan found that she can simply enlarge the text to a comfortable level and when her eyes tire she can switch to having the text read back to her at a comfortable speed and voice. She enjoys the option of both reading visually and sitting back and listening to the text. Also, she can adjust the volume and speed of the reader to a comfortable level. Since she borrowed the device, she has obtained one of her own which she uses frequently for all kinds of daily tasks as well as for her job.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 137 18 136 291
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 30 09 50 89
Subtotal 167 27 186 380
Have not made a decision 24 03 20 47
Subtotal 191 30 206 427
Nonrespondent 26 04 38 68
Total 217 34 244 495
Performance on this measure 87.43% 90% 90.29%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 39 07 46 92
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 18 03 27 48
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 15 01 20 36
4. Subtotal 72 11 93 176
5. None of the above 08 01 05 14
6. Subtotal 80 12 98 190
7. Nonrespondent 11 00 10 21
8. Total 91 12 108 211
9. Performance on this measure 90% 91.67% 94.9%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 553 78.33%
Satisfied 60 8.5%
Satisfied somewhat 14 1.98%
Not at all satisfied 05 0.71%
Nonrespondent 74 10.48%
Total Surveyed 706
Response rate % 89.52%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 41
Hearing 23
Speech Communication 81
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 28
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 22
Daily Living 35
Environmental Adaptations 22
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 54
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 10
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 316

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 155
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 94
Representatives of Education 52
Representatives of Employment 42
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 96
Representative of Community Living 34
Representative of Technology 05
Total 478

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 64
Service Provider 103
Vendor 18
Repair Service 07
Others 00
Total 192

D. Anecdote

Mrs. B has a physical disability which makes it difficult to re-position herself in bed at night. She called the ATRC in Pittsfield to find out if they had a device that can be of use. She had recently heard about the Weight and Seating Independence Project which provides accessible wheelchair scales and pressure mapping technology to the public. Mrs. B told ATRC staff she sleeps in the same position every night on her shoulder and that she often wondered if it would be a problem or cause any issues. The ATRC staff demonstrated two different pressure mapping systems available for borrowing to Mrs. B; both included pads for mapping seating and for mapping positioning in bed. Following the demonstration, Mrs. B decided one system looked easier for her to use, and borrowed it to use at home. When she returned it she reported that she was so happy and relieved to find out that she wasn’t having any pressure issues during sleep. Before the mapping session she had been questioning if she needed a new mattress. She liked that she could save and e mail the results to her doctor if she needed to. She really liked to be able to see on the screen what was going on and to get immediate feedback on her positioning. Overall the consumer reported that she was very happy to have access to the pressure mapping technology and that it has made a huge difference in her quality of life.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 64 48 126 238
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 14 19 14 47
Subtotal 78 67 140 285
Have not made a decision 09 03 12 24
Subtotal 87 70 152 309
Nonrespondent 04 01 02 07
Total 91 71 154 316
Performance on this measure 85.71% 94.37% 90.91%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 295 61.72%
Satisfied 51 10.67%
Satisfied somewhat 19 3.97%
Not at all satisfied 04 0.84%
Nonrespondent 109 22.8%
Total 478
Response rate % 77.2%

G. Notes:

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 113 31 1,437 1,581
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 23 04 62 89
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 67 04 433 504
4. Subtotal 203 39 1,932 2,174
5. None of the above 59 07 248 314
6. Subtotal 262 46 2,180 2,488
7. Nonrespondent 14 00 11 25
8. Total 276 46 2,191 2,513
9. Performance on this measure 73.55% 84.78% 88.18% 86.51%
ACL Performance Measure 75% 75% 75% 75%
Met/Not Met Not Met Met Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 201 66 262 529
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 44 28 64 136
Subtotal 245 94 326 665
Have not made a decision 33 06 32 71
Subtotal 278 100 358 736
Nonrespondent 30 05 40 75
Total 308 105 398 811
Performance on this measure 79.55% 89.52% 81.91% 82%
ACL Performance Measure 70% 70% 70% 70%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 354
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 61
Representatives of Education 122
Representatives of Employment 30
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 143
Representatives of Community Living 222
Representatives of Technology 09
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 941

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
941 00 00 941

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 32
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 24
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 00
Combination of any/all of the above 389
Transition 496
Total 941

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

In Fy18, MassMATCH hosted a high impact training on the use of Pressure Mapping Technology for the staff of the Tewksbury State Hospital. The training was conducted by Mary Jo Wagner, OTR/L, ATP who works for the state Dept. of Developmental Services. The content was developed following an initial set of trainings conducted under the Weight and Seating Independence Project, funded by the Reeves Foundation in 2017, which has since been extended statewide. A total of 15 medical and other professionals from within the hospital attended the training. The topics covered included issues to consider when working with individuals with all forms of paralyses, where to find potentially useful equipment, and where to find additional resources. This 1.5 hour training was very hands-on and allowed participants to try out pressure mapping technology systems. All the participants stated that it gave them a better appreciation of the issues people with paralysis have to deal with. The content of the training is being further refined so that it can be offered online via webinar to the general public sometime in the spring of 2019.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

During FY18, MassMATCH staff again collaborated with our partners at the MA Executive Office of Elder Affairs (EOEA) to develop and host a series of 9 assistive technology trainings across the state. These were all advanced trainings and followed another training series we hosted in FY17. The curriculum of the new trainings was revised based on feedback received from the year before. All 9 trainings were considered Advanced and provided a detailed exploration of the use of the Transition Assistance to Community Living Environment (TACLE) assessment tool. This simple tool, developed under MassMATCH, was designed for use with individuals who are planning to move from institutions into the community, and helps consumers and professionals identify areas of independent living in which the consumer may benefit from the use of assistive technology, as well as helping them identify resources to acquire the needed AT. To broaden the scope of the training and attract a wider audience MassMATCH engaged Dr. Kevin Berner of Easter Seals MA to conduct the trainings, and provided professional education credits for various professional who took the trainings. Participants included staff of local Aging and Disability Resource Consortia organizations, such as transition coordinators, waiver case managers, housing search entities, options counselors, Adult Family Care programs, Veterans Service Officers, Supported Living Providers, etc.. With the increased clinical focus and CEUs, this training series was able to attract other professionals such as nurses, social workers and Occupational therapists. A total of 208 individuals attended the 9 training sessions across the state.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 00
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 00
Performance Measure Percentage NaN%
RSA Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Not Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 37%
Employment 0%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 27%
Community Living 15%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 21%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

The Weight and Seating Independence Project was funded by the Christopher and Dana Reeves Foundation in FY17 and FY18, to provide access to wheelchair scales and pressure mapping technology to people with paralysis living in Western Mass. At the end of the grant period MassMATCH decided to expand the project statewide. During the project it had become clear that the sole PMT brand in the inventory was inadequate, and the ATRC staff decided to find another brand to add to the inventory. Kobena Bonney, the MassMATCH Program Coordinator, provided technical assistance to the two ATRC providers to help them determine what pressure mapping device to purchase. MassMATCH staff helped the ATRCs research available options and they were able to identify which brand to purchase. As a result, users of the device demo and loan program now have multiple PMT systems to choose from the inventory.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

During the 2018 Fiscal Year, MassMATCH staff provided additional technical assistance to the Independent Living Center in Springfield, MA in connection with the Weight and Seating Independence Project. The primary goal of the WSIP is to enable individuals with SCI successfully live in the community. MassMATCH staff helped the ILC determine the best way to address a major problem with the wheelchair accessible platform scale at their location. The scale stop working for a while. When MassMATCH staff became aware of the situation, they intervened. Kobena Bonney, the program Coordinator reach out to the local ILC staff to help them diagnose the cause of the problem. He then worked with all the relevant parties to ensure all the necessary steps were taken resulting in the successful repair and recalibration of the scale. Once again, as a result of the TA provided, the wheelchair accessible platform scale in Springfield is fully operational again and servicing the needs of folks with SCI

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. During FY18 MassMATCH conducted targeted public AT presentations/demonstrations in connection with a new grant award we received from the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation. The award is funding our Weight and Seating Independence Project (WSIP), which aims to improve the independence, autonomy and control of health and wellness by persons with paralysis in central and western Massachusetts by increasing awareness of and providing access to digital pressure mapping technology and wheelchair accessible scales in the least restrictive environment. As a result of the success of the Reeve Foundation funded one-year project, we decided to expand the Weight and Seating Independence Project statewide. We also incorporated the equipment into our existing device demo and loan programs in order to ensure its sustainability. We carried out additional public outreach to publicize the expansion of the project and wider availability of the equipment. We hosted four Open House events in different areas across the state. Those events were open to the public and we took the opportunity to celebrate the success of WSIP and demonstrated both the PMT and the wheelchair accessible scales. We also created a separate WSIP website where we posted information and resources about the project such as manuals, videos, etc. Other public awareness activities included electronic and printed flyers, Facebook/blog postings, newsletter and email articles, etc. In addition to the Open House events, MassMATCH staff brought examples of both the accessible scales and the pressure mapping technology to some of the larger conferences and events we attended, such as the 3-day Abilities Expo Boston, the annual Human Service Providers Conference, and the annual statewide ADA celebration hosted by the Statewide Independent Living Council. From the feedback we received, the presentations/demonstrations were very successful as they provided participants with valuable information about available AT resources in the state as well as concrete evidence of the impact of AT.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 2,236 57 2,293
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 1,543 58 1,601
Representative of Education 642 17 659
Representative of Employment 577 20 597
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 1,493 27 1,520
Representative of Community Living 472 31 503
Representative of Technology 38 06 44
Unable to Categorize 708 141 849
Total 7,709 357 8,066

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Public/State Agency$35,000Reuse
State Appropriations$329,604Reuse
Public/State Agency$41,080Training
State Appropriations$79,924Device Loan
Private$12,377Device Loan
Amount: $497,985

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 13:50:41 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY18 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.