Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | Yes |
Area of Residence | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Metro RUCC 1-3 |
Non-Metro RUCC 4-9 |
||
Approved Loan made | 105 | 09 | 114 |
Approved Not made | 21 | 02 | 23 |
Rejected | 13 | 01 | 14 |
Total | 139 | 12 | 151 |
Lowest Income: | $2,364 | Highest Income: | $207,624 |
---|
Sum of Incomes | Loans Made | Average Annual Income |
---|---|---|
$5,282,844 | 114 | $46,341 |
Income Ranges | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$15,000 or Less |
$15,001- $30,000 |
$30,001- $45,000 |
$45,001- $60,000 |
$60,001- $75,000 |
$75,001 or More |
||
Number of Loans | 43 | 19 | 20 | 06 | 08 | 18 | 114 |
Percentage of Loans | 37.72% | 16.67% | 17.54% | 5.26% | 7.02% | 15.79% | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Percentage of loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 112 | 98.25% |
Partnership Loans | ||
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
With interest buy-down only | 02 | 1.75% |
With loan guarantee only | 00 | 0% |
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee | 00 | 0% |
Total | 114 | 100% |
Type of Loan | Number of Loans | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Revolving Loans | 112 | $526,854 |
Partnership Loans | 02 | $3,422 |
Total | 114 | $530,276 |
Lowest | 0% |
---|---|
Highest | 5% |
Sum of Interest Rates | Number of Loans Made | Average Interest Rate |
---|---|---|
560 | 114 | 4.91228070175439% |
Interest Rate | Number of loans |
---|---|
0.0% to 2.0% | 02 |
2.1% to 4.0% | 00 |
4.1% to 6.0% | 112 |
6.1% to 8.0% | 00 |
8.1% - 10.0% | 00 |
10.1%-12.0% | 00 |
12.1%-14.0% | 00 |
14.1% + | 00 |
Total | 114 |
Type of AT | Number of Devices Financed | Dollar Value of Loans |
---|---|---|
Vision | 03 | $6,219 |
Hearing | 43 | $126,425 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 01 | $253 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 28 | $55,350 |
Daily living | 07 | $28,107 |
Environmental adaptations | 02 | $15,022 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 27 | $297,720 |
Computers and related | 02 | $938 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 01 | $242 |
Total | 114 | $530,276 |
Number Loans in default | 05 |
---|---|
Net loss for loans in default | $4,993 |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 02 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | Other: Matched Saving Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 13 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 01 |
C. Total Served | 14 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 14 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 |
Hearing | 02 | $352 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 01 | $3,526 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 03 | $3,601 |
Daily living | 15 | $15,316 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 04 | $3,414 |
Computers and related | 05 | $3,104 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 01 | $40 |
Total | 31 | $29,353 |
How would you describe this state financing activity? | telecommunications distribution |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 81 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 02 |
C. Total Served | 83 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 83 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Devices Funded |
Value of
AT Provided |
---|---|---|
Vision | 47 | $62,883 |
Hearing | 25 | $5,052 |
Speech communication | 00 | $0 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 00 | $0 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 00 | $0 |
Daily living | 00 | $0 |
Environmental adaptations | 00 | $0 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 |
Computers and related | 76 | $50,222 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 |
Total | 148 | $118,157 |
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
When Wesley Salway lost the use of his arms and legs in his early 30s, he was not sure where his life would take him, or even if he would be able to live at home as steps up to the front door meant that he could not enter or leave the house. As the date approached for Wes to leave the hospital, his parents struggled to find a way to make the home accessible so that Wes would not be forced to move into a nursing facility. They did not have enough savings and previous credit issues prevented qualifying for a traditional bank loan. Then they heard about WATAP’s partner, the Northwest Access Fund, and decided to apply. The Salways were approved for a affordable loan that did not put a strain on their finances. They were able to have the necessary home modifications completed for Wes to successfully transition from hospital to home. They are grateful that Wesley has a more ‘normal’ existence instead of living in an adult home or unable to leave the hospital. The home modifications have made this family’s life significantly easier and more enjoyable.
Lucille Racek is a 92 year old woman who has severe hearing and vision loss. When she first came to WATAP, she was no longer able to make phone calls, watch TV, and read printed material which made her feel very isolated. Through WATAP and the iCanConnect program, Lucille was provided demonstrations of several types of devices and after a full evaluation, it was determined that a Google Home smart speaker would best suit her needs. She was not only provided the device through the iCanConnect program, but also received training on how to use the device. Lucille uses Google Home to make phone calls to family and friends, listen to music, the radio, and the news, keep up with her favorite sports teams, and set alarms and reminders. She is delighted to be able to once again independently contact loved ones and keep up with current events.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 15 | 144 | 164 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 39 | 39 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 15 | 187 | 207 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 15 | 190 | 210 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
8. Total | 05 | 15 | 191 | 211 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 97.91% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 190 | 90.05% |
Satisfied | 21 | 9.95% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 211 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 01 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,942 |
C. Total | 2,943 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,943 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 01 | $3,000 | $0 | $3,000 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 01 | $3,000 | $0 | $3,000 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 07 | $10,447 | $0 | $10,447 |
Hearing | 93 | $70,320 | $7,698 | $62,622 |
Speech Communication | 02 | $6,300 | $0 | $6,300 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | $336 | $0 | $336 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 2,248 | $2,590,155 | $0 | $2,590,155 |
Daily Living | 1,776 | $497,434 | $0 | $497,434 |
Environmental Adaptations | 220 | $15,085 | $0 | $15,085 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 01 | $2,000 | $0 | $2,000 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $1,050 | $50 | $1,000 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 4,350 | $3,193,127 | $7,748 | $3,185,379 |
Over a period of seven years, Bridge Ministries Meyer Mobility Center, a device reuse partner of WATAP, has provided equipment to “Vera,” who was paralyzed in the lower half of her body as a result of a car accident at the age of 20. In the beginning Vera was provided an electric prone stander and an ultralite sport wheelchair. Later, as her needs changed, she was fitted to another ultralite chair better suited to her current living and employment situation. Next, she was provided a different stander that she could use to transfer herself out of her wheelchair and then shift herself up into a standing position. This new stander gave her greater independence and more opportunity to improve her circulation and strengthen her leg muscles. This year, 4 years after her last visit, Vera returned with a husband and a two-year old son. She was in need of a newer ultralite chair as the last chair she was provided was wearing out. She is grateful to everyone who had donated the equipment that Meyer Mobility Center refurbished and provided to her. Device reuse is the only way Vera could afford the mobility equipment she needed to live independently and fully over these past 7 years and she trusted the Center to provide her with the technology that best meet her on-going and changing needs.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 07 | 1,877 | 1,888 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 805 | 805 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 11 | 233 | 245 |
4. Subtotal | 05 | 18 | 2,915 | 2,938 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 05 | 05 |
6. Subtotal | 05 | 18 | 2,920 | 2,943 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 05 | 18 | 2,920 | 2,943 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.83% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,928 | 99.49% |
Satisfied | 13 | 0.44% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.07% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 2,943 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 257 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 03 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 05 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 04 |
Total | 269 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 161 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 18 |
Representative of Education | 17 |
Representative of Employment | 09 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 41 |
Representatives of Community Living | 01 |
Representatives of Technology | 22 |
Total | 269 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 21 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 70 |
Hearing | 21 |
Speech Communication | 40 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 29 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 07 |
Daily Living | 79 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 117 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 |
Total | 363 |
Elsa, who is now 6, has cerebral palsy and has limited mobility and is mostly non-verbal. She and her mother came to WATAP in October 2017, when Elsa was 5 years old, to look at communication options. It was during her first visit when it was casually mentioned that Elsa wanted to go trick or treating for the first time on Halloween. They were shown a Big Mac Red Switch and they quickly saw that this would be an easy and quick solution for this year. Elsa’s mother recorded a simple message, “Trick or treat” and held the switch at the side of Elsa’s head and Elsa quickly learned to hit the switch with her head. Elsa borrowed the switch from WATAP, dressed up as a donut for her first Halloween, and had a great time. Because the switch is light-weight and simple to use, Elsa borrowed the switch again for Halloween in 2018, along with a mounting arm so she could hit the switch with her hand. She was a beautiful mermaid this year and had lots of fun along with all the other children trick-or treating.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 28 | 46 | 127 | 201 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 04 | 04 |
Subtotal | 28 | 46 | 131 | 205 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 28 | 46 | 131 | 205 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 52 | 52 |
Total | 28 | 46 | 183 | 257 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 05 | 02 | 01 | 08 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 01 | 04 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 02 | 12 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 08 | 02 | 02 | 12 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 08 | 02 | 02 | 12 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 123 | 45.72% |
Satisfied | 10 | 3.72% |
Satisfied somewhat | 02 | 0.74% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 134 | 49.81% |
Total Surveyed | 269 | |
Response rate % | 50.19% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 46 |
Hearing | 20 |
Speech Communication | 17 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 44 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 04 |
Daily Living | 06 |
Environmental Adaptations | 33 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 95 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 268 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 244 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 97 |
Representatives of Education | 52 |
Representatives of Employment | 29 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 06 |
Representative of Community Living | 11 |
Representative of Technology | 00 |
Total | 439 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 01 |
Service Provider | 05 |
Vendor | 50 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 56 |
“T” is a 48-year-old man with a history of progressive multiple sclerosis. T contacted WATAP to help him to achieve his personal goals of improving voice volume output, using a telephone and any devices that might provide improved access to music, books, environmental controls and movies. Through a WATAP AT Specialist, T was provided a demonstration of a voice amplification system and a digital assistant (Amazon Echo) with WiFi switch controllers. Significant improvement was noted with initial trials of a voice amplification system and he was able to combine this to successfully operate Amazon Echo Show and the switch controllers and expressed high levels of excitement in being able to successfully complete even the simplest independent activities. After the demo, T was able to borrow the devices and after it was determined these were good matches, T was provided an Amazon Echo Show and two wireless interface switches to control a fan and a table lamp with funding from a private MS foundation fund. He uses Echo to correctly answer questions, movies of interest, see favorite music lyrics, make a phone call, read books and activate the switch interface for operating his room fan. T stated that the equipment had significantly improved his quality of life. To quote T, “she’s like my new best friend.”
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 20 | 111 | 101 | 232 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 22 | 03 | 25 |
Subtotal | 20 | 133 | 104 | 257 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 01 | 09 | 11 |
Subtotal | 21 | 134 | 113 | 268 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 21 | 134 | 113 | 268 |
Performance on this measure | 95.24% | 99.25% | 92.04% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 419 | 95.44% |
Satisfied | 17 | 3.87% |
Satisfied somewhat | 03 | 0.68% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total | 439 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Our demonstration numbers fell this year due to the loss of one of our partner Assistive Technology and Assessment Practitioners (ATAPs) in the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR). We are working with DVR to figure out how best to meet the AT needs of VR clients and we hope to have more personnel in place to provide AT demonstrations in FY 2019.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 14 | 24 | 2,022 | 2,060 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 845 | 848 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 01 | 11 | 237 | 249 |
4. Subtotal | 18 | 35 | 3,104 | 3,157 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 08 | 08 |
6. Subtotal | 18 | 35 | 3,112 | 3,165 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
8. Total | 18 | 35 | 3,113 | 3,166 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 99.71% | 99.72% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 48 | 157 | 228 | 433 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 22 | 07 | 29 |
Subtotal | 48 | 179 | 235 | 462 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 01 | 09 | 11 |
Subtotal | 49 | 180 | 244 | 473 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 52 | 52 |
Total | 49 | 180 | 296 | 525 |
Performance on this measure | 97.96% | 99.44% | 79.39% | 88% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 53 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 85 |
Representatives of Education | 126 |
Representatives of Employment | 185 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 96 |
Representatives of Community Living | 92 |
Representatives of Technology | 136 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 773 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
683 | 70 | 20 | 773 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 309 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 00 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 116 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 167 |
Transition | 181 |
Total | 773 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP continues to provide intensive training statewide in collaboration with the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR), reaching 171 case managers, employment specialists, and community rehabilitation providers. Each training is designed to build competencies, promote the consideration of and proper matching of AT, and explore case studies and best practices around topics that have been identified by past participants as needed to better serve DVR clients. The topics covered this past year were Computer Access and Ergonomic Solutions, AT for Cognitive Impairments and Mental Health Issues, AT for Learning Disability, AT for the Aging Worker, AT for SelfCare and Independent Living, and AT of Communication. WATAP surveys all participants so that we are responsive to training requests and needs from the field.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
WATAP provided a second year of halfday trainings through partnership with WA Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) / Home & Community Services (HCS), Aging & Longterm Support (ALTSA) Administration throughout the state for frontline staff from AAA, HCS, ALTSA and other DSHS and community partners serving older adults and persons with disabilities. Five trainings were provided to 126 attendees this past year. Over the 2 years of this partnership, 310 ombudsmans, case managers, family caregiver managers, or information and referral specialists, with some family caregiver and self advocates participated in these workshops. 209 of these participants provided feedback to a survey administered after each workshop. The participants overwhelmingly stated that the content presented in the workshops were relevant and useful (99% rating good to excellent). Additionally, 100% (rating good to excellent) felt the instructors were effective in teaching the subject material and the workshops were well organized. 94% felt the workshops were a good to excellent chance to practice what was learned. Most telling, the 53% participants reported that their knowledge of the topic was poor to fair with a further 35% reporting good knowledge before the workshop. After the workshop, 58% reported very good knowledge with an additional 24% reporting excellent knowledge, a dramatic shift in knowledge uptake. Overall, 88% related their satisfaction of the workshops as very good to excellent. Additionally, the participants were asked how they would use the information in the 6 months following the workshop. 74% stated specifically that they would use the knowledge gained to help their clients or residents achieve better independence and to help reduce caregiver hours. Many stated that they would share the information with colleagues and several were excited to learn of WATAP’s services and planned to utilize those services in the future. Participants were also asked whether any of the AT they learned about would benefit clients currently being served with mentioning medication management, mobility, eating, communication aids and devices, off-the shelf modifications, vision, computing and artificial intelligence, gardening, and hearing were the categories singled out, but overwhelmingly, the participants responded that AT in general would greatly benefit who they are serving. Additionally, WATAP partnered with the State’s Special Education Technology Center to provide a webinar for educators that explored assistive technology tools that can increase a student’s independence and performance in school and as they transition to post-secondary education, employment and community living. WATAP also conducted a workshop for transition students to consider and discuss their own AT needs as they move to work or college.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
A series of trainings was provided to 96 content creators and IT managers located at various departments at the City of Seattle. The trainings covered the core steps for creating accessible new documents, best practices for addressing and prioritizing accessibility for existing hard copy and electronic documents, the process of creating accessible documents using Microsoft (MS) Word, how best to convert MS Word documents to PDF, and how to use Adobe Acrobat to check for, correct for, and enhance the accessibility of PDFs. The trainings were well received and there is further interest from the city for WATAP to provide assistance in crafting accessible ICT policies city-wide and some additional trainings, including how to create accessible content in various social media platforms.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 116 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 116 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 0% |
---|---|
Employment | 10% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 5% |
Community Living | 80% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 5% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
Easterseals Washington was awarded a grant from Comcast to create a “Technology Achievement Center” at an Adult Day Center in Bellevue, WA. WATAP provided assistance in selecting, purchasing, and installing the technology to include in the accessible computer lab with the goal of supporting program participants in reaching their educational and vocational goals, and in turn achieve greater independence. Additionally, WATAP also provided training the center’s staff to ensure the lab is utilized to its fullest moving forward. The Easterseals’ Comcast Technology Achievement Center officially opened on Wednesday, February 28th. The lab has seen great buy-in and support from the Center staff, who were initially skeptical of its value. Already, staff have seen some positive outcomes with participants. Easterseals and WATAP plan to use this initial lab as a model for these new locations and for other future endeavors.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. WATAP continued making a concerted effort to attend rural and agricultural focused events especially in the eastern portion of the state, both through tabling and presentations. The goal was to increase awareness and provide opportunities for in-person demonstrations outside of the greater Puget Sound region Venues included the Food and Farm Expo in Spokane, the Spokane Ag Expo, and Wenatchee Community Summit. 326 individuals attended presentations and directly experienced a wide array of gardening and daily living AT, including smart home solutions and methods of customizing off-the shelf items with simple modifications. Additionally, over 700 individuals visited our tables at these events and over 40 of these individuals received demonstrations of AT. All attendees reported they were grateful for the information and exposure, as they had not thought of the various ways AT could be of benefit.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 781 | 162 | 943 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 430 | 95 | 525 |
Representative of Education | 128 | 02 | 130 |
Representative of Employment | 249 | 24 | 273 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 136 | 10 | 146 |
Representative of Community Living | 179 | 39 | 218 |
Representative of Technology | 61 | 00 | 61 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 1,964 | 332 | 2,296 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Public/State Agency | $4,297 | Device Loan |
Public/State Agency | $34,500 | Training |
Private | $199,388 | State Financing |
Private | $5,000 | Technical Assistance |
Private | $1,065 | Device Loan |
Amount: $244,250 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 14:02:19 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)