National Assistive Technology Act Data System

Annual Progress Report - Full Report

Washington 2018

General Information

Statewide AT Program (Information to be listed in national State AT Program Directory)

State AT Program Title:
Washington Assistive Technology Act Program
State AT Program Title:
State AT Program URL
http://watap.org
Mailing Address:
UW Box 357920
City:
Seattle
State:
Wa
Zip Code:
98195
Program Email:
watap@uw.edu
Phone:
800-214-8731
TTY:
866-866-0162

Lead Agency

Agency Name:
UW Center for Technology and Disability Studies
Mailing Address:
4333 Brooklyn Ave NE Box 359472
City:
Seattle
State:
Wa
Zip Code:
98195
Program URL:
http://www.washington.edu

Implementing Entity

Name of Implementing Agency:
Mailing Address:
City
State:
Zip Code:
Program URL:

Program Director and Other Contacts

Program Director for State AT Program (last, first):
Knue, Alan
Title:
Director
Phone:
2066856836
E-mail:
aknue@uw.edu
Program Director at Lead Agency (last, first):
Knue, Alan
Title:
Director
Phone:
2066856836
E-mail:
aknue@uw.edu
Primary Contact at Implementing Agency (last, first) - If applicable:
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Person Responsible for completing this form if other than Program Director

Name (last, first):
Title:
Phone:
E-mail:

Certifying Representative

Name (last, first):
Rhodes, Carol
Title:
Director, Office of Sponsored Programs
Phone:
2065434043
E-mail:
osp@uw.edu

State Financing

Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? Yes
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? Yes

Loan Applications
Area of Residence Total
Metro
RUCC 1-3
Non-Metro
RUCC 4-9
Approved Loan made 105 09 114
Approved Not made 21 02 23
Rejected 13 01 14
Total 139 12 151

2. Income of Applicants to Whom Loans Were Made

Lowest/Highest Incomes
Lowest Income: $2,364 Highest Income: $207,624

Average Income
Sum of Incomes Loans Made Average Annual Income
$5,282,844 114 $46,341

Number and Percentage of Loans Made to Applicants by Income Range
Income Ranges Total
$15,000
or Less
$15,001-
$30,000
$30,001-
$45,000
$45,001-
$60,000
$60,001-
$75,000
$75,001
or More
Number of Loans 43 19 20 06 08 18 114
Percentage of Loans 37.72% 16.67% 17.54% 5.26% 7.02% 15.79% 100%

3. Loan Type

Loan Type
Type of Loan Number of Loans Percentage of loans
Revolving Loans 112 98.25%
Partnership Loans
Without interest buy-down or loan guarantee 00 0%
With interest buy-down only 02 1.75%
With loan guarantee only 00 0%
With both interest buy-down and loan guarantee 00 0%
Total 114 100%

Loan Type Summary
Type of Loan Number of Loans Dollar Value of Loans
Revolving Loans 112 $526,854
Partnership Loans 02 $3,422
Total 114 $530,276

4. Interest Rates

Interest Rates
Lowest 0%
Highest 5%

Interest Rate Summary
Sum of Interest Rates Number of Loans Made Average Interest Rate
560 114 4.91228070175439%

Number of Loans Made by Interest Rate
Interest Rate Number of loans
0.0% to 2.0% 02
2.1% to 4.0% 00
4.1% to 6.0% 112
6.1% to 8.0% 00
8.1% - 10.0% 00
10.1%-12.0% 00
12.1%-14.0% 00
14.1% + 00
Total 114

5. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed

Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Financed
Type of AT Number of Devices Financed Dollar Value of Loans
Vision 03 $6,219
Hearing 43 $126,425
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 01 $253
Mobility, seating and positioning 28 $55,350
Daily living 07 $28,107
Environmental adaptations 02 $15,022
Vehicle modification and transportation 27 $297,720
Computers and related 02 $938
Recreation, sports, and leisure 01 $242
Total 114 $530,276

6. Defaults

Defaults
Number Loans in default 05
Net loss for loans in default $4,993

B. State Financing Activities that provide consumers with resources and services that result in the acquisition of AT devices and services

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? 02
Activity 1
How would you describe this state financing activity? Other: Matched Saving Program
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 13
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 01
C. Total Served 14

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 14

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 00 $0
Hearing 02 $352
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 01 $3,526
Mobility, seating and positioning 03 $3,601
Daily living 15 $15,316
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 04 $3,414
Computers and related 05 $3,104
Recreation, sports, and leisure 01 $40
Total 31 $29,353

Activity 2
How would you describe this state financing activity? telecommunications distribution
2. Geographic Distribution, Number of Individuals Who Acquired AT Devices and Services and Number for whom Performance Measure Data are Collected
Geographic Distribution
County of Residence Individuals Served
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) 81
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) 02
C. Total Served 83

Performance Measure Number
Performance Measure Number
D. Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 83

If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

3. Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Types and Dollar Amounts of AT Funded
Type of AT Device / Service Number of Devices
Funded
Value of
AT Provided
Vision 47 $62,883
Hearing 25 $5,052
Speech communication 00 $0
Learning, cognition, and developmental 00 $0
Mobility, seating and positioning 00 $0
Daily living 00 $0
Environmental adaptations 00 $0
Vehicle modification and transportation 00 $0
Computers and related 76 $50,222
Recreation, sports, and leisure 00 $0
Total 148 $118,157

C. State Financing Activities that Allow Consumers to Obtain AT at Reduced Cost

1. Overview of Activities Performed

How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? 00

D. Anecdote

When Wesley Salway lost the use of his arms and legs in his early 30s, he was not sure where his life would take him, or even if he would be able to live at home as steps up to the front door meant that he could not enter or leave the house. As the date approached for Wes to leave the hospital, his parents struggled to find a way to make the home accessible so that Wes would not be forced to move into a nursing facility. They did not have enough savings and previous credit issues prevented qualifying for a traditional bank loan. Then they heard about WATAP’s partner, the Northwest Access Fund, and decided to apply. The Salways were approved for a affordable loan that did not put a strain on their finances. They were able to have the necessary home modifications completed for Wes to successfully transition from hospital to home. They are grateful that Wesley has a more ‘normal’ existence instead of living in an adult home or unable to leave the hospital. The home modifications have made this family’s life significantly easier and more enjoyable.

Wes, and his mom and dad on the ramp that they built.
Impact Area

Lucille Racek is a 92 year old woman who has severe hearing and vision loss. When she first came to WATAP, she was no longer able to make phone calls, watch TV, and read printed material which made her feel very isolated. Through WATAP and the iCanConnect program, Lucille was provided demonstrations of several types of devices and after a full evaluation, it was determined that a Google Home smart speaker would best suit her needs. She was not only provided the device through the iCanConnect program, but also received training on how to use the device. Lucille uses Google Home to make phone calls to family and friends, listen to music, the radio, and the news, keep up with her favorite sports teams, and set alarms and reminders. She is delighted to be able to once again independently contact loved ones and keep up with current events.

Lucille with her Google Home
Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 15 144 164
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 39 39
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 04 04
4. Subtotal 05 15 187 207
5. None of the above 00 00 03 03
6. Subtotal 05 15 190 210
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
8. Total 05 15 191 211
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 97.91%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 190 90.05%
Satisfied 21 9.95%
Satisfied somewhat 00 0%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 211
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Reutilization

A. Number of Recipients of Reused Devices

Activity Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity
A. Device Exchange 01
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan 2,942
C. Total 2,943

Performance Measure
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure 00
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients 00
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures 2,943

If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:

B. Device Exchange Activities

Device Exchange
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Exchanged Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged Savings to Consumers
Vision 01 $3,000 $0 $3,000
Hearing 00 $0 $0 $0
Speech Communication 00 $0 $0 $0
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 00 $0 $0 $0
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 00 $0 $0 $0
Daily Living 00 $0 $0 $0
Environmental Adaptations 00 $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 00 $0 $0 $0
Computers and Related 00 $0 $0 $0
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 01 $3,000 $0 $3,000

C. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassignment and/or Open Ended Loan Activities

Device Reassign/Repair/Refurbish and/or OEL
Type of AT Device Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired Total Estimated Current Purchase Price Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold Savings to Consumers
Vision 07 $10,447 $0 $10,447
Hearing 93 $70,320 $7,698 $62,622
Speech Communication 02 $6,300 $0 $6,300
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 01 $336 $0 $336
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 2,248 $2,590,155 $0 $2,590,155
Daily Living 1,776 $497,434 $0 $497,434
Environmental Adaptations 220 $15,085 $0 $15,085
Vehicle Modification & Transportation 01 $2,000 $0 $2,000
Computers and Related 02 $1,050 $50 $1,000
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00 $0 $0 $0
Total 4,350 $3,193,127 $7,748 $3,185,379

D. Anecdote

Over a period of seven years, Bridge Ministries Meyer Mobility Center, a device reuse partner of WATAP, has provided equipment to “Vera,” who was paralyzed in the lower half of her body as a result of a car accident at the age of 20. In the beginning Vera was provided an electric prone stander and an ultralite sport wheelchair. Later, as her needs changed, she was fitted to another ultralite chair better suited to her current living and employment situation. Next, she was provided a different stander that she could use to transfer herself out of her wheelchair and then shift herself up into a standing position. This new stander gave her greater independence and more opportunity to improve her circulation and strengthen her leg muscles. This year, 4 years after her last visit, Vera returned with a husband and a two-year old son. She was in need of a newer ultralite chair as the last chair she was provided was wearing out. She is grateful to everyone who had donated the equipment that Meyer Mobility Center refurbished and provided to her. Device reuse is the only way Vera could afford the mobility equipment she needed to live independently and fully over these past 7 years and she trusted the Center to provide her with the technology that best meet her on-going and changing needs.

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 04 07 1,877 1,888
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 00 00 805 805
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 11 233 245
4. Subtotal 05 18 2,915 2,938
5. None of the above 00 00 05 05
6. Subtotal 05 18 2,920 2,943
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 05 18 2,920 2,943
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.83%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 2,928 99.49%
Satisfied 13 0.44%
Satisfied somewhat 02 0.07%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total Surveyed 2,943
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Device Loan

A. Short-Term Device Loans by Type of Purpose

Loans By Purpose
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan Number
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) 257
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding 03
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation 05
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity 04
Total 269

B. Short-Term Device Loan by Type of Borrower

LOANS By Borrower Type
Type of Individual or Entity Number of Device Borrowers
Individuals with Disabilities 161
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 18
Representative of Education 17
Representative of Employment 09
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 41
Representatives of Community Living 01
Representatives of Technology 22
Total 269

C. Length of Short-Term Device Loans

Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days 21

D. Types of Devices Loaned

Types of Devices Loaned
Type of AT Device Number
Vision 70
Hearing 21
Speech Communication 40
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 29
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 07
Daily Living 79
Environmental Adaptations 00
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 117
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 00
Total 363

E. Anecdote

Elsa, who is now 6, has cerebral palsy and has limited mobility and is mostly non-verbal. She and her mother came to WATAP in October 2017, when Elsa was 5 years old, to look at communication options. It was during her first visit when it was casually mentioned that Elsa wanted to go trick or treating for the first time on Halloween. They were shown a Big Mac Red Switch and they quickly saw that this would be an easy and quick solution for this year. Elsa’s mother recorded a simple message, “Trick or treat” and held the switch at the side of Elsa’s head and Elsa quickly learned to hit the switch with her head. Elsa borrowed the switch from WATAP, dressed up as a donut for her first Halloween, and had a great time. Because the switch is light-weight and simple to use, Elsa borrowed the switch again for Halloween in 2018, along with a mounting arm so she could hit the switch with her hand. She was a beautiful mermaid this year and had lots of fun along with all the other children trick-or treating.

Impact Area

F. Access Performance Measures

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 28 46 127 201
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 00 04 04
Subtotal 28 46 131 205
Have not made a decision 00 00 00 00
Subtotal 28 46 131 205
Nonrespondent 00 00 52 52
Total 28 46 183 257
Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

G. Acquisition Performance Measures

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 05 02 01 08
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 03 00 01 04
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 00 00 00 00
4. Subtotal 08 02 02 12
5. None of the above 00 00 00 00
6. Subtotal 08 02 02 12
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
8. Total 08 02 02 12
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 100%

H. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 123 45.72%
Satisfied 10 3.72%
Satisfied somewhat 02 0.74%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 134 49.81%
Total Surveyed 269
Response rate % 50.19%

I. Notes:

Device Demonstration

A. Number of Device Demonstrations by Device Type

Type of AT Device / Service Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services
Vision 46
Hearing 20
Speech Communication 17
Learning, Cognition and Developmental 44
Mobility, Seating and Positioning 04
Daily Living 06
Environmental Adaptations 33
Vehicle Modification and Transportation 00
Computers and Related 95
Recreation, Sports and Leisure 03
Total # of Devices Demonstrated 268

B. Types of Participants

Demonstrations by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations
Individuals with Disabilities 244
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives 97
Representatives of Education 52
Representatives of Employment 29
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 06
Representative of Community Living 11
Representative of Technology 00
Total 439

C. Number of Referrals

Referrals
Type of Entity Number of Referrals
Funding Source (non-AT program) 01
Service Provider 05
Vendor 50
Repair Service 00
Others 00
Total 56

D. Anecdote

“T” is a 48-year-old man with a history of progressive multiple sclerosis. T contacted WATAP to help him to achieve his personal goals of improving voice volume output, using a telephone and any devices that might provide improved access to music, books, environmental controls and movies. Through a WATAP AT Specialist, T was provided a demonstration of a voice amplification system and a digital assistant (Amazon Echo) with WiFi switch controllers. Significant improvement was noted with initial trials of a voice amplification system and he was able to combine this to successfully operate Amazon Echo Show and the switch controllers and expressed high levels of excitement in being able to successfully complete even the simplest independent activities. After the demo, T was able to borrow the devices and after it was determined these were good matches, T was provided an Amazon Echo Show and two wireless interface switches to control a fan and a table lamp with funding from a private MS foundation fund. He uses Echo to correctly answer questions, movies of interest, see favorite music lyrics, make a phone call, read books and activate the switch interface for operating his room fan. T stated that the equipment had significantly improved his quality of life. To quote T, “she’s like my new best friend.”

Impact Area

E. Performance Measures

Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 20 111 101 232
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 22 03 25
Subtotal 20 133 104 257
Have not made a decision 01 01 09 11
Subtotal 21 134 113 268
Nonrespondent 00 00 00 00
Total 21 134 113 268
Performance on this measure 95.24% 99.25% 92.04%

F. Customer Satisfaction

Satisfaction
Customer Rating of Services Number of Customers Percent
Highly satisfied 419 95.44%
Satisfied 17 3.87%
Satisfied somewhat 03 0.68%
Not at all satisfied 00 0%
Nonrespondent 00 0%
Total 439
Response rate % 100%

G. Notes:

Our demonstration numbers fell this year due to the loss of one of our partner Assistive Technology and Assessment Practitioners (ATAPs) in the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR). We are working with DVR to figure out how best to meet the AT needs of VR clients and we hope to have more personnel in place to provide AT demonstrations in FY 2019.

Overall Performance Measures

Overall Acquisition Performance Measure

Acquisition Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. 14 24 2,022 2,060
2. AT was only available through the AT program. 03 00 845 848
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. 01 11 237 249
4. Subtotal 18 35 3,104 3,157
5. None of the above 00 00 08 08
6. Subtotal 18 35 3,112 3,165
7. Nonrespondent 00 00 01 01
8. Total 18 35 3,113 3,166
9. Performance on this measure 100% 100% 99.71% 99.72%
ACL Performance Measure 75% 75% 75% 75%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Overall Access Performance Measure

Access Performance Measures
Response Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed Total
Education Employment Community Living
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs 48 157 228 433
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs 00 22 07 29
Subtotal 48 179 235 462
Have not made a decision 01 01 09 11
Subtotal 49 180 244 473
Nonrespondent 00 00 52 52
Total 49 180 296 525
Performance on this measure 97.96% 99.44% 79.39% 88%
ACL Performance Measure 70% 70% 70% 70%
Met/Not Met Met Met Met Met

Training

A. Training Participants: Number and Types of Participants; Geographical Distribution

Training by Participant Type
Type of Participant Number
Individuals with Disabilities 53
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 85
Representatives of Education 126
Representatives of Employment 185
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 96
Representatives of Community Living 92
Representatives of Technology 136
Unable to Categorize 00
TOTAL 773

Geographic Distribution of Participants
Metro Non Metro Unknown TOTAL
683 70 20 773

B. Training Topics

Trainings by Topic
Primary Topic of Training Participants
AT Products/Services 309
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice 00
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access 116
Combination of any/all of the above 167
Transition 181
Total 773

B. Description of Training Activities

Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:

WATAP continues to provide intensive training statewide in collaboration with the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR), reaching 171 case managers, employment specialists, and community rehabilitation providers. Each training is designed to build competencies, promote the consideration of and proper matching of AT, and explore case studies and best practices around topics that have been identified by past participants as needed to better serve DVR clients. The topics covered this past year were Computer Access and Ergonomic Solutions, AT for Cognitive Impairments and Mental Health Issues, AT for Learning Disability, AT for the Aging Worker, AT for SelfCare and Independent Living, and AT of Communication. WATAP surveys all participants so that we are responsive to training requests and needs from the field.

Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

WATAP provided a second year of halfday trainings through partnership with WA Area Agencies on Aging (AAA) / Home & Community Services (HCS), Aging & Longterm Support (ALTSA) Administration throughout the state for frontline staff from AAA, HCS, ALTSA and other DSHS and community partners serving older adults and persons with disabilities. Five trainings were provided to 126 attendees this past year. Over the 2 years of this partnership, 310 ombudsmans, case managers, family caregiver managers, or information and referral specialists, with some family caregiver and self advocates participated in these workshops. 209 of these participants provided feedback to a survey administered after each workshop. The participants overwhelmingly stated that the content presented in the workshops were relevant and useful (99% rating good to excellent). Additionally, 100% (rating good to excellent) felt the instructors were effective in teaching the subject material and the workshops were well organized. 94% felt the workshops were a good to excellent chance to practice what was learned. Most telling, the 53% participants reported that their knowledge of the topic was poor to fair with a further 35% reporting good knowledge before the workshop. After the workshop, 58% reported very good knowledge with an additional 24% reporting excellent knowledge, a dramatic shift in knowledge uptake. Overall, 88% related their satisfaction of the workshops as very good to excellent. Additionally, the participants were asked how they would use the information in the 6 months following the workshop. 74% stated specifically that they would use the knowledge gained to help their clients or residents achieve better independence and to help reduce caregiver hours. Many stated that they would share the information with colleagues and several were excited to learn of WATAP’s services and planned to utilize those services in the future. Participants were also asked whether any of the AT they learned about would benefit clients currently being served with mentioning medication management, mobility, eating, communication aids and devices, off-the shelf modifications, vision, computing and artificial intelligence, gardening, and hearing were the categories singled out, but overwhelmingly, the participants responded that AT in general would greatly benefit who they are serving. Additionally, WATAP partnered with the State’s Special Education Technology Center to provide a webinar for educators that explored assistive technology tools that can increase a student’s independence and performance in school and as they transition to post-secondary education, employment and community living. WATAP also conducted a workshop for transition students to consider and discuss their own AT needs as they move to work or college.

Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:

A series of trainings was provided to 96 content creators and IT managers located at various departments at the City of Seattle. The trainings covered the core steps for creating accessible new documents, best practices for addressing and prioritizing accessibility for existing hard copy and electronic documents, the process of creating accessible documents using Microsoft (MS) Word, how best to convert MS Word documents to PDF, and how to use Adobe Acrobat to check for, correct for, and enhance the accessibility of PDFs. The trainings were well received and there is further interest from the city for WATAP to provide assistance in crafting accessible ICT policies city-wide and some additional trainings, including how to create accessible content in various social media platforms.

D. IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure

IT/Telecommunications Training Performance Measure
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received Number
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies 116
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented 00
No known outcome at this time 00
Nonrespondent 00
Total 116
Performance Measure Percentage 100%
RSA Target Percentage 70%
Met/Not Met Met

E. Notes:

Technical Assistance

A. Frequency and Nature of Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance by Recipient Type
Education 0%
Employment 10%
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation 5%
Community Living 80%
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) 5%
Total 100%

B. Description of Technical Assistance

Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:

Easterseals Washington was awarded a grant from Comcast to create a “Technology Achievement Center” at an Adult Day Center in Bellevue, WA. WATAP provided assistance in selecting, purchasing, and installing the technology to include in the accessible computer lab with the goal of supporting program participants in reaching their educational and vocational goals, and in turn achieve greater independence. Additionally, WATAP also provided training the center’s staff to ensure the lab is utilized to its fullest moving forward. The Easterseals’ Comcast Technology Achievement Center officially opened on Wednesday, February 28th. The lab has seen great buy-in and support from the Center staff, who were initially skeptical of its value. Already, staff have seen some positive outcomes with participants. Easterseals and WATAP plan to use this initial lab as a model for these new locations and for other future endeavors.

Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:

C. Notes:

Public Awareness

Public Awareness Activities

Public Awareness Narratives

Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.

1. WATAP continued making a concerted effort to attend rural and agricultural focused events especially in the eastern portion of the state, both through tabling and presentations. The goal was to increase awareness and provide opportunities for in-person demonstrations outside of the greater Puget Sound region Venues included the Food and Farm Expo in Spokane, the Spokane Ag Expo, and Wenatchee Community Summit. 326 individuals attended presentations and directly experienced a wide array of gardening and daily living AT, including smart home solutions and methods of customizing off-the shelf items with simple modifications. Additionally, over 700 individuals visited our tables at these events and over 40 of these individuals received demonstrations of AT. All attendees reported they were grateful for the information and exposure, as they had not thought of the various ways AT could be of benefit.

2.

Information And Assistance

Information And Assistance Activities by Recipient
Types of Recipients AT Device/
Service
AT Funding Total
Individuals with Disabilities 781 162 943
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives 430 95 525
Representative of Education 128 02 130
Representative of Employment 249 24 273
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation 136 10 146
Representative of Community Living 179 39 218
Representative of Technology 61 00 61
Unable to Categorize 00 00 00
Total 1,964 332 2,296

Notes:

State Improvement Outcomes

State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? 00

A. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?


B. State Improvements

1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.


2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)


3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?

Additional And Leveraged Funds

Additional and Leveraged Funds

Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? Yes

A. Leveraged Funding for State Plan Activities

State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds
Public/State Agency$4,297Device Loan
Public/State Agency$34,500Training
Private$199,388State Financing
Private$5,000Technical Assistance
Private$1,065Device Loan
Amount: $244,250

B. Leveraged Funding for Activities Not in State Plan (data not previously reported in other activity sections)

Non-State Plan Activities
Fund Source Amount Use of Funds Individuals Served Other Outcome

C. Describe any unique issues with your data in this section (e.g., the reason why you were unable to report the number of individuals served with additional or leveraged funds).


Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 14:02:19 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)


Back to state program information page | Top of page

This FY18 State AT Program Annual Progress Report was exported from the National Assistive Technology Act Data System (NATADS). NATADS was developed with partial support from the Center for Assistive Technology Act Data Assistance.