Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | No |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
4. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
9. Performance on this measure | NaN% | NaN% | NaN% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | NaN% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | NaN% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | NaN% |
Total Surveyed | 00 | |
Response rate % | NaN% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 00 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 2,631 |
C. Total | 2,631 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 2,631 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Daily Living | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 2,026 | $1,286,237 | $0 | $1,286,237 |
Daily Living | 1,662 | $251,000 | $0 | $251,000 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 15 | $7,615 | $0 | $7,615 |
Total | 3,703 | $1,544,852 | $0 | $1,544,852 |
An individual contacted the state AT Act program’s durable medical equipment (DME) reuse partner for help with ambulation. This individual previously received a cane through Medicare, but now needed a three-wheeled walker. This individual received an appropriate walker for ambulation. Several months later, this individual contracted an infection which weakened her immune system. The individual became debilitated to the point she actually got stuck on the toilet one morning. The individual and her family began considering nursing home placement. Based on their positive experience with the reuse program previously, she and her daughter contacted the DME reuse program to ask for suggestions. Once again, the DME reuse program supported her by providing a bedside commode to use over the toilet so that she could use her arms and be elevated for easier standing. As a result, she regained her independence and avoided premature displacement into a nursing home. Now that she regained her strength, she is completely independent and living at home.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 14 | 03 | 1,803 | 1,820 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 391 | 394 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 06 | 00 | 132 | 138 |
4. Subtotal | 23 | 03 | 2,326 | 2,352 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 143 | 143 |
6. Subtotal | 23 | 03 | 2,469 | 2,495 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 136 | 136 |
8. Total | 23 | 03 | 2,605 | 2,631 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 89.29% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 2,402 | 91.3% |
Satisfied | 83 | 3.15% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 146 | 5.55% |
Total Surveyed | 2,631 | |
Response rate % | 94.45% |
State AT Act program contracted with a new vendor to support children's durable medical equipment (DME) needs. This is the first year that this vendor collected data. Vendor did not collect performance measures on all persons receiving equipment. This led to a high number of non-respondents, which lowered performance in the Community Living category. Additionally, the vendor had a high number of respondents that responded "None of the Above" in the performance measure. AT Act program is working with the vendor to educate them on the importance of performance data and how to help recipients better understand the performance measure questions so that they can respond adequately.
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 102 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 02 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 58 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 08 |
Total | 170 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 151 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 04 |
Representative of Education | 02 |
Representative of Employment | 02 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 10 |
Representatives of Community Living | 01 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Total | 170 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 14 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 10 |
Hearing | 11 |
Speech Communication | 07 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 85 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 70 |
Daily Living | 19 |
Environmental Adaptations | 11 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 03 |
Computers and Related | 50 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 01 |
Total | 267 |
In 2017, VATS was one of seven states awarded the 2017 High Impact Innovative Assistive Technology (HIIAT) Grant from the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation. Over the past year, VATS partnered with the vocational rehabilitation (VR) program and a non-profit organization in the Williamsburg area, to improve temporary home access. Temporary ramps and accessible pathways are staged and ready to deploy on a short-term equipment loan up to four months. The program’s name is, “PAKD!” (Portable Accessible Kits on Demand) because equipment is PAcKeD and ready to go! VATS received a call from a local Area Agency on Aging (AAA) regarding a community member who was being discharged from the hospital on hospice care. The individual’s wish was to remain at his house, spend time with his family, and stroll around the neighborhood in his wheelchair. VATS coordinated the installation of a temporary ramp with the family, VR program and AAA. The ramp allowed the gentleman to be discharged from the hospital to home and live the final days of his life the way that he wanted. A care coordinator from the local AAA reported: I am absolutely thrilled to report that gentleman received the PAKD!* Temporary Ramp from DARS-VATS. His niece says it was installed last Monday, 6/18/18. Thank you for everything that you did to make this happen. His niece says that on his good days she has been able to take him outside and roll him around the block in his wheelchair. His health continues to decline but this gentleman and his niece are very grateful. This gentleman passed away a few weeks later, but his final wish was to remain at home, spend time with his family and get out of the house. The ramp helped make this possible. The ramp was re-claimed, cleaned and ready for another!
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 52 | 35 | 11 | 98 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 02 | 02 | 04 |
Subtotal | 52 | 37 | 13 | 102 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 52 | 37 | 13 | 102 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 52 | 37 | 13 | 102 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 18 | 11 | 17 | 46 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 04 | 05 | 08 | 17 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 02 | 02 |
4. Subtotal | 22 | 16 | 27 | 65 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 03 | 03 |
6. Subtotal | 22 | 16 | 30 | 68 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 22 | 16 | 30 | 68 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 90% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 155 | 91.18% |
Satisfied | 06 | 3.53% |
Satisfied somewhat | 01 | 0.59% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 08 | 4.71% |
Total Surveyed | 170 | |
Response rate % | 95.29% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 09 |
Hearing | 04 |
Speech Communication | 12 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 88 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 13 |
Daily Living | 16 |
Environmental Adaptations | 08 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 17 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 08 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 175 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 292 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 24 |
Representatives of Education | 55 |
Representatives of Employment | 93 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 125 |
Representative of Community Living | 146 |
Representative of Technology | 02 |
Total | 737 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 07 |
Service Provider | 03 |
Vendor | 188 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 198 |
VATS Career Pathways for Individuals with Disabilities AT Specialist provided a demonstration of low-tech assistive technologies (AT) to help individuals with sensory impairments to staff at the Blue Ridge Community College Logistics Program / Adult Education. The CPID AT Specialist demonstrated a variety of equipment available in the “Sensory Backpack Kits”, a program developed by VATS in collaboration with the Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services (DARS). The demonstration helped staff make decisions regarding the types of technologies needed for individual students to be successful in the program. Following the demonstration, the CPID AT Specialist provided AT to the College to try with students in training programs. Staff reported that several items from the Sensory Backpack Kits were demonstrated and subsequently loaned for the students to use as the material became more difficult. One of the students is using the ‘foot fidgit’ as a means of helping with concentration. Another student is using stress balls or “squeezy eggs” to improve focus.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 31 | 83 | 51 | 165 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 02 | 03 | 07 |
Subtotal | 33 | 85 | 54 | 172 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Subtotal | 33 | 88 | 54 | 175 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 33 | 88 | 54 | 175 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 96.59% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 628 | 85.21% |
Satisfied | 49 | 6.65% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 05 | 0.68% |
Nonrespondent | 55 | 7.46% |
Total | 737 | |
Response rate % | 92.54% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 32 | 14 | 1,820 | 1,866 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 07 | 05 | 399 | 411 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 06 | 00 | 134 | 140 |
4. Subtotal | 45 | 19 | 2,353 | 2,417 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 146 | 146 |
6. Subtotal | 45 | 19 | 2,499 | 2,563 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 136 | 136 |
8. Total | 45 | 19 | 2,635 | 2,699 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 89.3% | 89.55% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 83 | 118 | 62 | 263 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 02 | 04 | 05 | 11 |
Subtotal | 85 | 122 | 67 | 274 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 03 | 00 | 03 |
Subtotal | 85 | 125 | 67 | 277 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 85 | 125 | 67 | 277 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 97.6% | 100% | 98.92% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 239 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 02 |
Representatives of Education | 179 |
Representatives of Employment | 74 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 172 |
Representatives of Community Living | 478 |
Representatives of Technology | 11 |
Unable to Categorize | 10 |
TOTAL | 1,165 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
933 | 210 | 22 | 1,165 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 676 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 05 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 24 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 440 |
Transition | 20 |
Total | 1,165 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
More than 40 conference participants interacted with assistive technology professionals in the Assistive Technoloy (AT) Training Room at the 2018 Collaborations Conference at the Norfolk Sheraton Waterside. Participants included VR and Employment Service Organization staff, as well as family members and individuals with disabilities. Conference participants were able to “drop-in” to the AT Room learn about AT for specific functional limitations and personally try out some of the latest and greatest assistive technology AT devices and gadgets available to accommodate individuals with disabilities at home, work or play. AT professionals from the states Alternative Financing, VR, Deaf & Hard of Hearing and AT Act program presented two 1 ½ hour training sessions. In addition to the training, staff provided resources and 1:1 demonstrations of new and emerging technologies in order to increase participants’ knowledge, skills, and competencies regarding AT as well has help individuals make informed decisions regarding appropriate and affordable AT solutions.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
VATS AT Acquisition & Aging coordinator partnered with seven (7) Virginia Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) to develop, train staff on the use of and distribute seven AT & Aging assistive technology (AT) kits to include new devices based on demand and research. The kits contain a variety of low cost AT to help “Vintage Virginians” be more independent at home and in the community. VATS staff provided a separate statewide training to seven AAAs on the benefits AT, resources and specific equipment. At the conclusion of the training, AAA staff were able to better understand the benefits of specific AT devices and better connect with the state AT Act program. VATS gave each AAA a kit with equipment to use in AAA local/state training and outreach efforts. VATS marketed the program in multiple public forums so that professionals and individuals would know that the AT kits were available in communities throughout Virginia. This program continues to expand! AAA’s provided positive feedback that the kits were helping to better engage with Vintage Virginians and helping to increase awareness of the state’s AT Act program.
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
In 2017-18, VATS collaborated with the US Customs and Boarder Protection / - Section 508 Compliance Team, to establish a mutually beneficial MOU. Accordingly, the US Customs & Boarder Protection – Section 508 Coordinator, provided 508 Compliance Training to twenty-four (24) AT Advisory Council members and guests. The training included an overview of how 508 standards compliance has evolved through legislation and explained what her team does to meet these standards. The training also included information of the Compliance Team’s role in helping agents with disabilities gain access to assistive technologies in order to overcome functional limitations. The training included detailed discussion on reasonable accommodations as well as 508 software and web application testing. The training helped participants better understand the evolution of Information and Communication Technology requirements as well as heightened awareness regarding workplace accommodations.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 24 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 00 |
No known outcome at this time | 00 |
Nonrespondent | 00 |
Total | 24 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 100% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 0% |
---|---|
Employment | 0% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 0% |
Community Living | 100% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
VATS AT Acquisition & Aging Coordinator convened multiple conference calls and face-to-face meetings to discuss ways that VATS and its partners could better coordinate reuse efforts among non-profits, and state agencies. Meetings included members from durable medical equipment reuse partners and emergency management programs. The meetings helped non-profits, state agencies, and emergency managers better understand each program’s role in disaster, planning, response and recovery as well as better coordinate statewide response efforts among providers. Follow-up meetings resulted in logistical planning of how to move ready to deploy staged DME from storage to state shelters. The result of the technical assistance included the following: • VATS and community reuse partner to participate in the writing of the VDEM’s State Plan including people with disabilities • 18 pallets of processed DME ready for deployment at all times • Development of “Shelter Kits” – specific to meet the need
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. State AT Act program staff provided an “AT @ Work” presentation at this Virginia Manufacturing Association’s (VMA) conference as a main event. The presentation included how assistive technology (AT) devices/services fit well with the “lean manufacturing” philosophy implemented by manufacturers. Participants were primarily business owners and managers. Staff educated manufacturing business owners and managers on the benefits of AT as well as the benefit of hiring a qualified Virginians with disabilities!
2. State AT Act program staff participated in an online class by the Virginia Adult Learning Resource Center, Virginia Commonwealth University. The course was titled, “Disabilities and the Adult Learner.” VATS staff provided examples of various assistive technologies (AT) that could be used in an adult learning situation as well as gave online feedback to course participants on AT that they identified as possible solutions. This public awareness initiative improved awareness of the State AT Act Program’s services and led to several pieces of AT being loaned to instructors for their classes and family members on a short-term basis. Participants included: educators; counselors; and therapists.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 71 | 20 | 91 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 37 | 11 | 48 |
Representative of Education | 17 | 00 | 17 |
Representative of Employment | 14 | 00 | 14 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 68 | 01 | 69 |
Representative of Community Living | 03 | 01 | 04 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 210 | 33 | 243 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
Federal | $15,000 | Demonstration |
Federal | $10,000 | Reuse |
Federal | $10,000 | Device Loan |
Federal | $8,000 | Device Loan |
Federal | $13,000 | Device Loan |
Private | $75,000 | Device Loan |
Amount: $131,000 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 14:01:42 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)