Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include any State Financing? | Yes |
---|---|
Did your approved state plan for this reporting period include conducting a Financial Loan Program? | No |
How many other state financing activities that provide consumers with access to funds for the purchase of AT devices and services were included in your approved state plan? | 00 |
---|
How many state financing activities that allow consumers to obtain AT at a reduced cost were included in your approved state plan? | 01 |
---|
How would you describe this state financing activity? | AT Fabrication Program |
---|
County of Residence | Individuals Served |
---|---|
A. Metro (RUCC 1-3) | 25 |
B. Non-Metro (RUCC 4-9) | 00 |
C. Total Served | 25 |
Performance Measure | Number |
---|---|
D. Excluded from Performance Measure | 00 |
E. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 25 |
If a number is reported in D you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device / Service | Number Provided | Total Estimated Current Retail Purchase Price |
Total Price for Which Devices Were Sold |
Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech communication | 02 | $260 | $0 | $260 |
Learning, cognition, and developmental | 01 | $42 | $0 | $42 |
Mobility, seating and positioning | 08 | $8,891 | $40 | $8,851 |
Daily living | 05 | $596 | $0 | $596 |
Environmental adaptations | 08 | $3,780 | $123 | $3,657 |
Vehicle modification and transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and related | 01 | $114 | $0 | $114 |
Recreation, sports, and leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 25 | $13,683 | $163 | $13,520 |
Diego (not his real name) is a 36-year-old professional photographer who lives in a small town in the east part of Puerto Rico, an area recently devastated by Hurricane Maria. He owns a digital art studio where he transforms his photos into masterful pieces for his clients. Diego told us that he had wanted for some time to use bigger cameras with large format lenses in his work, but due to his severe physical disabilities and small body size, the bulk and weight of the equipment was too much for him to handle. He wanted “something” that could hold the camera for him while at the same time allowing him to rotate, tilt and angle the camera effortlessly. Existing devices on the market could not handle the weight nor provide the flexibility of movement needed (the closest comparable device being the $850 Robo Arm Mount). Through PRATP's Low Cost Device Design and Development (LD3) initiative a prototype was created with the help of mechanical engineering students and Diego’s input. The prototype was tested and optimized to a final version that is fully adjustable, lightweight and can hold over 20lbs of equipment (the total cost of materials was $53). Diego can easily move the camera and access its controls while the device handles all the weight; once finished, the holder just slides-out or swings away. Immediately after installing the final version, Diego started taking pictures using the largest and heaviest lens he could find. He has now added several of these previously inaccessible tools to his professional inventory.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 00 | 00 | 09 | 09 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 01 | 01 | 13 | 15 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
4. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 23 | 25 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
6. Subtotal | 01 | 01 | 23 | 25 |
7. Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
8. Total | 01 | 01 | 23 | 25 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 25 | 100% |
Satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 0% |
Total Surveyed | 25 | |
Response rate % | 100% |
Activity | Number of Individuals Receiving a Device from Activity |
---|---|
A. Device Exchange | 03 |
B. Device Refurbish/Repair - Reassign and/or Open Ended Loan | 313 |
C. Total | 316 |
Performance Measure | |
---|---|
D. Device Exchange - Excluded from Performance Measure | 01 |
E. Reassignment/Refurbishment and Repair and Open Ended Loans - Excluded from Performance Measure because AT is provided to or on behalf of an entity that has an obligation to provide the AT such as schools under IDEA or VR agencies/clients | 00 |
F. Number of Individuals Included in Performance Measures | 315 |
If a number is reported in E you must provide a description of the reason the individuals are excluded from the performance measure:
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Exchanged | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Exchanged | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Hearing | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Speech Communication | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 09 | $8,191 | $0 | $8,191 |
Daily Living | 01 | $200 | $0 | $200 |
Environmental Adaptations | 03 | $629 | $0 | $629 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 02 | $653 | $0 | $653 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 15 | $9,673 | $0 | $9,673 |
Type of AT Device | Number of Devices Reassigned/Refurbished and Repaired | Total Estimated Current Purchase Price | Total Price for Which Device(s) Were Sold | Savings to Consumers |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vision | 11 | $16,121 | $0 | $16,121 |
Hearing | 06 | $4,558 | $0 | $4,558 |
Speech Communication | 07 | $32,626 | $0 | $32,626 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 01 | $99 | $0 | $99 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 326 | $146,628 | $0 | $146,628 |
Daily Living | 78 | $8,084 | $0 | $8,084 |
Environmental Adaptations | 06 | $2,241 | $0 | $2,241 |
Vehicle Modification & Transportation | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Computers and Related | 04 | $214 | $0 | $214 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 00 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Total | 439 | $210,571 | $0 | $210,571 |
Mateo (not his real name) is a three-year-old boy with positioning and mobility issues. Recently, he started to attend preschool in a regular baby carriage because he didn’t have any other mobility and positioning system. In this carriage, Mateo was in a very reclined position since the equipment did not allow him to maintain a proper sitting position. His parents were referred to the PRATP in order to seek out a device that could provide Mateo with a better positioning in the classroom since they could not afford the equipment and they did not have access to other funding sources. Through PRATP’s Reuse Program, a stroller for children with disabilities was reconditioned and provided to him. This equipment provides a complete positioning system while at the same time being lightweight and portable. The first time Mateo was seated in this adapted stroller, he immediately began to establish more eye contact and to smile more frequently. His parents were also very happy and aware of the positive impact of this equipment in Mateo’s life. The improved positioning will allow him to learn and to socialize better with the other preschoolers. It will also make it easier for his teachers and caretakers to transport him in a more effective and safe way.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 15 | 01 | 206 | 222 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 03 | 00 | 33 | 36 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 08 | 01 | 23 | 32 |
4. Subtotal | 26 | 02 | 262 | 290 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 06 | 06 |
6. Subtotal | 26 | 02 | 268 | 296 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 18 | 19 |
8. Total | 27 | 02 | 286 | 315 |
9. Performance on this measure | 96.3% | 100% | 91.61% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 297 | 93.99% |
Satisfied | 03 | 0.95% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 16 | 5.06% |
Total Surveyed | 316 | |
Response rate % | 94.94% |
Primary Purpose of Short-Term Device Loan | Number |
---|---|
Assist in decision-making (device trial or evaluation) | 26 |
Serve as loaner during service repair or while waiting for funding | 11 |
Provide an accommodation on a short-term basis for a time-limited event/situation | 31 |
Conduct training, self-education or other professional development activity | 09 |
Total | 77 |
Type of Individual or Entity | Number of Device Borrowers |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 61 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 03 |
Representative of Education | 05 |
Representative of Employment | 00 |
Representatives of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 04 |
Representatives of Community Living | 03 |
Representatives of Technology | 01 |
Total | 77 |
Length of Short-Term Device Loan in Days | 14 |
---|
Type of AT Device | Number |
---|---|
Vision | 11 |
Hearing | 10 |
Speech Communication | 10 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 08 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 41 |
Daily Living | 29 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 03 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 02 |
Total | 114 |
Amanda (not her real name) is a 35 years old young woman with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Due to the ALS, she lost the use of her upper and lower limbs, and her ability to speak, requiring assistive technology to achieve independence in communication and daily activities areas. For about two (2) years, Amanda has been using an eye tracking system to control her computer, to communicate with those around her, and to carry out activities that keep her in touch with the world beyond her home. However, her eye tracking system was damaged during hurricane Maria and she was no longer able to communicate nor perform any of her daily activities. Through PRATP’s AT Device Loan Program, an eye tracking system was provided and she used it to coordinate with a contact person the repair of her damaged device. Currently, Amanda’s eye tracker is up and running again and she continues to keep in contact with her world through her eyes.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 11 | 00 | 11 | 22 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Subtotal | 12 | 00 | 11 | 23 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Subtotal | 13 | 00 | 12 | 25 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 14 | 00 | 12 | 26 |
Performance on this measure | 92.31% | NaN% | 91.67% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 04 | 02 | 15 | 21 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 06 | 01 | 06 | 13 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 02 | 00 | 08 | 10 |
4. Subtotal | 12 | 03 | 29 | 44 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01 |
6. Subtotal | 12 | 03 | 30 | 45 |
7. Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 05 | 06 |
8. Total | 13 | 03 | 35 | 51 |
9. Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 96.67% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 68 | 88.31% |
Satisfied | 02 | 2.6% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 07 | 9.09% |
Total Surveyed | 77 | |
Response rate % | 90.91% |
Type of AT Device / Service | Number of Demonstrations of AT Devices / Services |
---|---|
Vision | 06 |
Hearing | 07 |
Speech Communication | 20 |
Learning, Cognition and Developmental | 07 |
Mobility, Seating and Positioning | 00 |
Daily Living | 00 |
Environmental Adaptations | 00 |
Vehicle Modification and Transportation | 00 |
Computers and Related | 01 |
Recreation, Sports and Leisure | 03 |
Total # of Devices Demonstrated | 44 |
Type of Participant | Number of Participants in Device Demonstrations |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 33 |
Family Members, Guardians, and Authorized Representatives | 43 |
Representatives of Education | 07 |
Representatives of Employment | 00 |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 01 |
Representative of Community Living | 05 |
Representative of Technology | 00 |
Total | 89 |
Type of Entity | Number of Referrals |
---|---|
Funding Source (non-AT program) | 00 |
Service Provider | 00 |
Vendor | 00 |
Repair Service | 00 |
Others | 00 |
Total | 00 |
Ricardo (not his real name) is a 28 years old graduate student at the University of Puerto Rico. Due to the progression of his retinitis pigmentosa condition, he is having difficulties with color contrast and a reduced field of vision. Both of these difficulties have had a negative impact on his academic performance, particularly in the reading and writing areas. Looking for assistive technology (AT) alternatives to overcome these barriers, Ricardo contacted PRATP to request an AT orientation and demonstration. During the demonstration, he was presented with several magnification devices in order to compare and contrast different alternatives available. Ricardo selected a desktop CCTV as the most viable option for him. The ability to change among several contrast settings, the adjustable arm, tiltable screen, and the distance viewing mode were features that addressed his various reading and writing needs. After the demonstration, Ricardo was referred to sources that could help him acquire the device.
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 18 | 02 | 24 | 44 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 18 | 02 | 24 | 44 |
Have not made a decision | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Subtotal | 18 | 02 | 24 | 44 |
Nonrespondent | 00 | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Total | 18 | 02 | 24 | 44 |
Performance on this measure | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Customer Rating of Services | Number of Customers | Percent |
---|---|---|
Highly satisfied | 72 | 80.9% |
Satisfied | 04 | 4.49% |
Satisfied somewhat | 00 | 0% |
Not at all satisfied | 00 | 0% |
Nonrespondent | 13 | 14.61% |
Total | 89 | |
Response rate % | 85.39% |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
1. Could only afford the AT through the AT program. | 19 | 03 | 230 | 252 |
2. AT was only available through the AT program. | 10 | 02 | 52 | 64 |
3. AT was available through other programs, but the system was too complex or the wait time too long. | 10 | 01 | 32 | 43 |
4. Subtotal | 39 | 06 | 314 | 359 |
5. None of the above | 00 | 00 | 07 | 07 |
6. Subtotal | 39 | 06 | 321 | 366 |
7. Nonrespondent | 02 | 00 | 23 | 25 |
8. Total | 41 | 06 | 344 | 391 |
9. Performance on this measure | 95.12% | 100% | 91.28% | 91.82% |
ACL Performance Measure | 75% | 75% | 75% | 75% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Response | Primary Purpose for Which AT is Needed | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Education | Employment | Community Living | ||
Decided that AT device/service will meet needs | 29 | 02 | 35 | 66 |
Decided that an AT device/ service will not meet needs | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Subtotal | 30 | 02 | 35 | 67 |
Have not made a decision | 01 | 00 | 01 | 02 |
Subtotal | 31 | 02 | 36 | 69 |
Nonrespondent | 01 | 00 | 00 | 01 |
Total | 32 | 02 | 36 | 70 |
Performance on this measure | 93.75% | 100% | 97.22% | 95.71% |
ACL Performance Measure | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met | Met | Met | Met |
Type of Participant | Number |
---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 07 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 11 |
Representatives of Education | 1,421 |
Representatives of Employment | 21 |
Rep Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 00 |
Representatives of Community Living | 325 |
Representatives of Technology | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 00 |
TOTAL | 1,785 |
Metro | Non Metro | Unknown | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|
1,780 | 05 | 00 | 1,785 |
Primary Topic of Training | Participants |
---|---|
AT Products/Services | 1,249 |
AT Funding/Policy/ Practice | 155 |
Information Technology/Telecommunication Access | 75 |
Combination of any/all of the above | 306 |
Transition | 00 |
Total | 1,785 |
Describe innovative one high-impact assistance training activity conducted during the reporting period:
During FY 2018, PRATP trained students and faculty of four engineering departments at the University of Puerto Rico on the design and development of accessible technologies for persons with disabilities. These technical trainings were provided as part of an effort to engage local talent in the creation of cost-effective solutions to address primary needs of individuals with disabilities, particularly those uncovered in the aftermath of hurricane Maria.
Breifly describe one training activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
Breifly describe one training activity related to Information and Communication Technology accessibility:
PRATP’s AT specialist on Information Technology and Computer Access conducted a series of training sessions for the Puerto Rico Tribunal Administration Office (TAO) on the creation of accessible documents and accessibility tools of mainstream platforms. Technical personnel from all the judicial centers of Puerto Rico participated in these sessions. During this period, PRATP also provided individual support to TAO personnel, webmasters, and librarians on improving accessibility in webpages, electronic forms, presentations and other documents.
Outcome/Result From IT/Telecommunications Training Received | Number |
---|---|
IT and Telecommunications Procurement or Dev Policies | 47 |
Training or Technique Assistance will be developed or implemented | 09 |
No known outcome at this time | 06 |
Nonrespondent | 13 |
Total | 75 |
Performance Measure Percentage | 74.7% |
RSA Target Percentage | 70% |
Met/Not Met | Met |
Education | 60% |
---|---|
Employment | 3% |
Health, Allied Health, Rehabilitation | 2% |
Community Living | 35% |
Technology (IT, Telecom, AT) | 0% |
Total | 100% |
Describe Innovative one high-impact assistance activity that is not related to transition:
PRATP provided technical assistance to the Puerto Rico Tribunal Administration Office (TAO) for the design, evaluation and implementation of their “Access to Justice” initiative. Assistive devices to be used at various stages of the judicial process were demonstrated, tested and recommended. Training videos were created for technical personnel to connect, configure and use AT devices in the courtroom.
Breifly describe one technical assistance activity related to transition conducted during the reporting period:
The Puerto Rico Assistive Technology (PRATP) provided technical assistance to state university personnel to continue the implementation process of Certification 111, 2014-2015. This document addresses the requirements established by the “Law of Extended Admission, Reasonable Accommodation and Retention of Students with Disabilities or Functional Diversity Transitioning from Secondary Schools to Post-Secondary Degrees”. All eleven campuses of the State University are being impacted by this Island wide initiative.
Describe in detail at least one and no more than two innovative or high-impact public awareness activities conducted during this reporting period. Highlight the content/focus of the awareness information shared, the mechanism used to disseminate or communicate the awareness information, the numbers and/or types of individuals reached, and positive outcomes resulting from the activity. If quantative numbers are available regarding the reach of the activity, please provide those: however, quantative data is not required.
1. During this reporting period, the Puerto Rico Assistive Technology Program (PRATP) participated in several radio and television interviews as part of an effort to reach areas of the Island that were severely damaged by hurricanes Irma and María. Information regarding the availability of reused AT devices, repair services and low-cost AT adaptation services, among several other initiatives, were disseminated through the airwaves to reach communities were persons with disabilities needed help with replacing AT equipment that was lost or damaged in the aftermath of the storms. It is estimated that about 15,000 people were reached by radio and over 10,000 by television.
2.
Types of Recipients | AT Device/ Service |
AT Funding | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Individuals with Disabilities | 197 | 20 | 217 |
Family Members, Guardians and Authorized Representatives | 206 | 24 | 230 |
Representative of Education | 34 | 17 | 51 |
Representative of Employment | 12 | 02 | 14 |
Representative of Health, Allied Health, and Rehabilitation | 40 | 09 | 49 |
Representative of Community Living | 51 | 06 | 57 |
Representative of Technology | 00 | 00 | 00 |
Unable to Categorize | 11 | 02 | 13 |
Total | 551 | 80 | 631 |
State improvement outcomes are not required. You may report up to two MAJOR state improvement outcomes for this reporting period. How many will you be reporting? | 00 |
---|
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
1. In one or two sentences, describe the outcome. Be as specific as possible about exactly what changed during this reporting period as a result of the AT program's initiative.
2. In one or two sentences, describe the written policies, practices, and procedures that have been developed and implemented as a result of the AT program's initiative. Include information about how to obtain the full documents, such as a Web site address or e-mail address of a contact person, but do not include the full documents here. (If there are no written polices, practices and procedures, explain why.)
3. What was the primary area of impact for this state improvement outcome?
Did you have Additional and Leveraged Funding to Report? | Yes |
---|
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds |
---|---|---|
State Appropriations | $35,000 | Technical Assistance |
State Appropriations | $20,000 | Demonstration |
State Appropriations | $50,000 | Public Awareness, I&A |
State Appropriations | $30,000 | Reuse |
State Appropriations | $40,000 | Device Loan |
State Appropriations | $50,000 | Training |
State Appropriations | $45,000 | State Financing |
Amount: $270,000 |
Fund Source | Amount | Use of Funds | Individuals Served | Other Outcome |
---|
Association of Assistive Technology Act Programs . Saved: Wed Mar 13 2019 14:07:38 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time)